California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results Citizens of the World Los Angeles

Transcription

1 California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results Citizens of the World Los Angeles CONTENTS: 1. Background and context 2. School-wide LA CAASPP results compared to Los Angeles (LAUSD) and California 3. School-wide LA CAASPP results compared to CAASPP results 4. Grade level LA CAASPP results compared to Los Angeles (LAUSD) and California 5. Subgroup performance compared to Los Angeles (LAUSD) and California 6. School-wide LA CAASPP results compared to , and CAASPP results 7. Subgroup LA CAASPP results compared to , and CAASPP results 1. BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT In early October, the California Department of Education published results of the 20 California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP), the fourth year that California state assessment results have been publicly available. These assessments have been designed to determine students progress toward college as delineated by Common Core State Standards a set of national standards that have been adopted across the country. CAASPP assesses skills based on adaptive multiple choice questions as well as performance tasks (such as writing). CAASPP results are published in multiple formats, including: Tiered achievement levels. CAASPP provides data in four (4) achievement levels: Level 1 (standard not met), Level 2 (standard nearly met), Level 3 (standard met) and Level 4 (standard exceeded). Generally, levels 3 and 4 are considered to be at or above grade level performance. Sub-group achievement level data. CAASPP provides data on the performance of groups of students with shared demographic characteristics, including race/ethnicity, free and reduced price lunch eligibility, and special education and English language learner designations. Additional data. There is data for content areas that provide additional information such as reading, writing, speaking and listening, and research and inquiry in ELA; and concepts and procedures, problem solving, modeling and data analysis, and communicating reasoning in math. This document displays the results of the three Los Angeles ( LA) schools: Hollywood (assessed in grades ), Silver Lake (assessed in grades 3-8), and Mar Vista (assessed in grades ), along with regional network-wide results. We compare our results to district and statewide scores to add further context and focus on analyzing the percentage of students achieving levels 3 and 4 of performance, since this is generally 1

2 considered to be at or above grade level. Throughout this document, we share results for grades (elementary school only), grades 6-8 (middle school only), as well as network-wide (grades 3-8) so that both comparisons can be made. It is also important to note that for many school-wide analyses in this report, LA staff has analyzed data using commonly understood methodologies. This data cannot be found on public data sources but the analysis was conducted as accurately as possible (data is rounded to the nearest tenth). Below is a summary of the number of test takers at each site, by subgroup. Throughout the report, you will see reference to student race/ethnicity and other subgroups. The terms used in this report align with state terms for the same groups. Table 1: Number of Test Takers Per Site, by Grade Level Hollywood Silver Lake Mar Vista Grade % Grade % % % Grade % % Grade 6 n/a n/a 66 13% 37 13% Grade 7 n/a n/a 72 15% n/a n/a Grade 8 n/a n/a 53 11% n/a n/a Total Table 2: Number of Test Takers Per Site, by Subgroup Hollywood Silver Lake Mar Vista African American 7* 3% 31 6% 31 11% Asian 41 18% 60 12% 15 5% Caucasian % % Hispanic or Latino 60 26% % 76 28% Two or More Races 1* 34 7% 16 6% Other 4* 2% 13 3% 9* 3% Total, race/ethnicity Econ Disadvantaged % 80 29% English Learner 30 13% 59 12% 29 11% Student with Disability 28 12% 68 14% 34 12% *Consistent with state protocols, no score is published because 10 or fewer students had test scores 2

3 2. SCHOOL-WIDE LA CAASPP RESULTS COMPARED TO LOS ANGELES (LAUSD) AND CALIFORNIA Below we present the overall percentage of students achieving levels 3 and 4 on English Language Arts (ELA) and Mathematics for each school and the region overall compared to performance in LAUSD and California. We also include the percentile ranking of schools and the region overall when compared to all LAUSD schools (including charter schools and magnet schools). English Language Arts 10 Schools and Region Compared to LAUSD and California Percentage of Students Achieving Level 3 and 4 75% 71% 66% 49% Mathematics 10 Hollywood 77% Silver Lake Overall Mar Vista Overall LA District Gr. 3-8 Schools and Region Compared to LAUSD and California Percentage of Students Achieving Level 3 and 4 State Gr % 33% Hollywood Silver Lake Overall Mar Vista Overall LA District Gr. 3-8 State Gr

4 Below we provide the percentile rankings for each school and the region overall compared to LAUSD elementary and middle schools (including charter schools and magnet schools). Table 3: Percentile Ranking of LA Compared to LAUSD Elementary and Middle Schools (including charter schools and magnet schools) Percentile (Actual Rank) Hollywood Silver Lake* Mar Vista* LA* ELA Math ELA Math ELA Math ELA Math Elementary Schools (# out of 606) Top 7% (#43) Top 3% (#18) Top 16% (#95) Top 12% (#71) Top 11% (#66) Top 1 (#56) Top 12% (#73) Top 8% (#47) Middle Schools (# out of 248) Top (#50) Top 24% (#60) Top 3% (#8) Top 16% (#40) Top 16% (#39) Top 22% (#55) Elementary & Middle (# out of 773) Top 17% (#125) Top 17% (#126) Top 9% (#67) Top 9% (#63) Top 12% (#91) Top 1 (#74) *For Silver Lake, Mar Vista and Los Angeles, the data that is included in the analysis includes grade levels for Elementary Schools, grade levels 6-8 for Middle Schools, and grade levels 3-8 for Elementary & Middle. Note: Elementary Schools include all elementary schools plus span schools that also serve grades TK-5. As a result, other grade levels (grades 6-12) are also included in this comparison group. Middle Schools include all middle schools plus span schools that also serve grades 6-8. As a result, other grade levels (grades TK-5 or 9-12) are also included in this comparison group. Elementary & Middle Schools include all elementary and middle schools that serve grades TK-8 plus span schools that also serve grades TK-8. As a result, other grade levels (grades 9-12) are also included in this comparison group. 4

5 3. SCHOOL-WIDE LA CAASPP RESULTS COMPARED TO CAASPP RESULTS Below we present the overall percentage of students achieving levels 3 and 4 on English Language Arts (ELA) and Mathematics for each LA school and the region overall compared to performance in LAUSD and California from last year, English Language Arts Schools and Region Compared to LAUSD and California Percentage of Students Achieving Level 3 and 4 from to % 75% 56% 61% 76% 71% 76% 76% 71% 72% 56% 57% 66% 49% HW SL MV LA District 3 8 State 3-8 Mathematics 10 Schools and Region Compared to LAUSD and California Percentage of Students Achieving Level 3 and 4 from to 20 75% 77% 61% 56% 55% 68% 68% 62% 67% 66% 39% 33% 39%

6 4. GRADE LEVEL LA CAASPP RESULTS COMPARED TO LOS ANGELES (LAUSD) AND CALIFORNIA Below we present the overall percentage of students achieving levels 3 and 4 on English Language Arts (ELA) and Mathematics for each grade level in each school and the region overall, compared to performance in LAUSD and California. English Language Arts 10 Compared to LAUSD and California Percentage By Grade Level Achieving Levels 3 and 4 79% 75% 74% 63% 55% 55% 54% 51% 78% 76% 66% 73% 73% 62% 62% 54% 51% 48% 49% 5 49% 42% 42% 49% 48% 42% 39% HW Silver SL Mar Vista MV Los LA District District State State Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Mathematics 10 88% Compared to LAUSD and California Percentage By Grade Level Achieving Levels 3 and % 62% 71% 66% 68% 71% 55% 43% 5 36% 43% 42% 36% 29% 3 28% 29% 49% 43% 37% 36% 37% 37% HW Silver SL Mar Vista MV Los LA District District State State 6

7 5. SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE COMPARED TO LOS ANGELES (LAUSD) AND CALIFORNIA Below we present the overall percentage of students achieving levels 3 and 4 on English Language Arts (ELA) and Mathematics for each sub-group published by the state. We start with comparing each sub-group s performance in each LA school to LAUSD and California. Secondly we present the gaps between the sub-groups, again comparing each LA school to LAUSD and California. We first show the gap between English language learners, special education and economically disadvantaged to the average for all students. Second, we show the gap between the racial/ethnic subgroups and the highest performing racial/ethnic subgroup. Please note that if there were 10 or fewer students in the particular subgroup, the state has not published the score and therefore we do not include this subgroup in the analysis below. 7

8 5a. Subgroup Performance District and Statewide Comparison, Grades 3-8 Table 4: English Language Arts LA Compared to Los Angeles (LAUSD) and California Percentage by Race/Ethnicity and Other Subgroups Achieving Levels 3 and 4 HW SL Overall MV Overall LA District Gr. 3 8 State Gr. 3 8 All Students 75% 71% 66% 49% African American *** 26% 48% 39% 32% Asian 93% 67% 93% 79% 76% 76% Caucasian 85% 81% 82% 83% 68% Hispanic or Latino 43% 44% 35% Two or More Races *** 79% 81% 68% Econ Disadvantaged 44% 54% 5 35% 36% English Learner 27% 14% 24% 19% 4% 13% Reclassified FEP* 97% 86% 74% 43% 58% Student with Disability 29% 22% % Table 5: Mathematics LA Compared to Los Angeles (LAUSD) and California Percentage by Race/Ethnicity and Other Subgroups Achieving Levels 3 and 4 HW SL Overall MV Overall LA District Gr. 3 8 State Gr. 3 8 All Students 77% 62% 33% African American *** 13% 35% 28% 21% 21% Asian 98% 73% 73% 82% 72% 74% Caucasian 84% 7 74% 75% 59% 55% Hispanic or Latino 35% 42% 26% 28% Two or More Races *** 62% 81% 56% Econ Disadvantaged 48% 48% 26% 27% English Learner 43% 24% 27% 6% 13% Reclassified FEP* 97% 55% 77% 67% 33% 45% Student with Disability 36% 25% 34% 3 9% 13% *** Consistent with state protocols, no score is published because 10 or fewer students had test scores *RFEP: Reclassified Fluent English Proficient 8

9 5b. Subgroup Performance Versus Average Performance of All Students, Grades 3-8 English Language Arts 10 Subgroup Variance vs. All Students Percentage represents variance 48% 47% 36% 34% 15% 16% 18% 6% 12% 21% Hollywood Silver Lake Economically Mar Overall Vista District State Disadvantaged English Learner Student with Disability HW SL MV District 3 8 State 3-8 Mathematics 10 Subgroup Variance vs. All Students Percentage represents variance 34% 32% 27% 27% 26% 28% 24% 27% 8% 14% 14% 6% 13% Hollywood Silver Lake Economically Mar Overall Vista District State Disadvantaged English Learner Student with Disability 9

10 5c. Race/Ethnicity Subgroup Versus Highest Performing Subgroup (Caucasian), Grades 3-8 English Language Arts 10 Subgroup Variance vs. Caucasian Percentage Represents Difference 55% 34% 37% 33% 42% 29% 33% 26% 14% *** Hollywood Silver Lake Mar Overall Vista District State - African American -7% -11% -8% -12% Asian Hispanic or Latino HW SL MV District 3 8 State 3-8 Mathematics 10 Subgroup Variance vs. Caucasian Percentage Represents Difference 57% 39% 39% 35% 32% 35% 32% 35% 28% *** Hollywood Silver Lake Mar Overall Vista District State - -14% -11% -18% African Hispanic American Asian or Latino *** Consistent with state protocols, no score is published because 10 or fewer students had test scores -3% 1% 10

11 6. SCHOOL-WIDE LA CAASPP RESULTS COMPARED TO PRIOR-YEAR CAASPP RESULTS Below we present the overall percentage of students achieving levels 3 and 4 on English Language Arts (ELA) and Mathematics for each LA school and the region overall compared to performance in LAUSD and California from through 20. English Language Arts 10 Schools and Region Compared to LAUSD and California Percentage of Students Achieving Level 3 and 4 from to 20 77% 74% 75% 51% 63% 47% 56% 76% 71% 68% 61% 62% 59% 76% 71% 61% 72% 68% 57% 56% 47% 65% 66% 37% 49% '18 ' HW SL MV LA District 3 8 State 3-8 Mathematics 10 Schools and Region Compared to LAUSD and California Percentage of Students Achieving Level 3 and 4 from to 20 58% 7 77% 75% 61% 56% 55% 48% 68% 58% 68% 62% 66% 67% 61% 58% 39% 58% 3 26% 33% 39% 35% '18 '

12 7. SUBGROUP LA CAASPP RESULTS COMPARED TO PRIOR YEAR CAASPP RESULTS Below we present the change in the percentage of students by subgroup achieving levels 3 and 4 on English Language Arts (ELA) and Mathematics for each LA school and the region overall compared to the change in performance in LAUSD and California from through 20. Middle school grade levels are not included in this section. English Language Arts Economically Disadvantaged 10 Percentage Achieving Level 3 and 4: Economically Disadvantaged 49% 59% 56% 49% 47% 47% 43% 44% 63% 54% 5 45% 57% 49% 5 35% 25% 32% 28% 36% 33% HW SL MV LA District 3 8 State 3-8 Mathematics Economically Disadvantaged 10 Percentage Achieving Level 3 and 4: Economically Disadvantaged 39% 55% 65% 44% 44% 47% 63% 48% 44% 39% 55% 48% 42% 25% 26% 24% 21% 27% 26% 25% 21%

13 English Language Arts English Learner 10 Percentage Achieving Level 3 and 4: English Learners 12% 21% 27% 24% 16% 24% 14% 42% 24% 3 25% 37% 23% 19% 15% 13% 13% 13% *** *** % 5% 4% 4% HW SL MV LA District 3 8 State 3-8 Mathematics English Learner 10 Percentage Achieving Level 3 and 4: English Learners 21% 16% 44% 43% 28% 29% 26% % 22% *** *** 24% 32% 27% 32% % 27% 23% 14% 13% 13% 14% 5% 6% 6% 6% *** Consistent with state protocols, no score is published because 10 or fewer students had test scores 13

14 English Language Arts Reclassified Fluent English Proficient 10 66% 77% 97% 91% Percentage Achieving Level 3 and 4: Reclassified Fluent English Proficient 82% 74% 72% 83% 75% 86% 7 86% 82% 78% 79% 74% 74% 58% 61% 58% 58% 45% 42% 43% *** *** *** HW SL MV LA District 3 8 State 3-8 Mathematics Reclassified Fluent English Proficient 10 97% 89% 62% Math Grades 3-8 Percentage Achieving Level 3 and 4: Reclassified Fluent English Proficient 47% 67% 58% 55% 83% 77% 63% 81% 78% 66% 74% 67% 34% 34% 33% 33% 47% 45% *** *** *** *** Consistent with state protocols, no score is published because 10 or fewer students had test scores 14

15 English Language Arts Student with Disability 10 Percentage Achieving Level 3 and 4: Student with Disability 67% 36% 45% 54% 29% 15% 45% % 22% 35% 35% 22% *** *** 5 29% % 32% 47% 39% 3 14% 15% 7% 8% 8% 1 13% 14% HW SL MV LA District 3 8 State 3-8 Mathematics Student with Disability 10 Math Grades 3-8 Percentage Achieving Level 3 and 4: Student with Disability 45% 36% 36% % 33% 34% 29% 25% 23% *** *** 48% 34% % 37% 37% 33% 36% 3 13% 13% 7% 8% 7% 9% 12% 13% 3-7 '17 *** Consistent with state protocols, no score is published because 10 or fewer students had test scores 15

16 English Language Arts African American 10 Percentage Achieving Level 3 and 4: African American 65% 8% 43% 26% 48% 47% 45% 37% 54% 43% 39% 28% 27% 22% 32% 28% 29% 25% *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** HW SL MV LA District 3 8 State 3-8 Mathematics African American 10 Percentage Achieving Level 3 and 4: African American 47% 8% 26% 14% 13% 5 35% 36% 42% 28% 18% 21% 19% 16% 21% 18% *** *** *** *** *** *** **** *** '17 *** Consistent with state protocols, no score is published because 10 or fewer students had test scores 16

17 English Language Arts Asian 10 78% 93% 89% 87% 79% 73% 7 Percentage Achieving Level 3 and 4: Asian 93% 83% 81% 81% 78% 65% 67% 79% 76% 75% 72% 72% 76% 66% 73% 76% 73% *** *** *** HW SL MV LA District 3 8 State 3-8 Mathematics Asian 10 79% 75% 98% 97% 79% 67% Percentage Achieving Level 3 and 4: Asian 76% 76% 61% 78% 73% 73% 76% 75% 87% 86% 71% 85% 82% 71% 72% 71% 66% 72% 73% 74% '17 *** Consistent with state protocols, no score is published because 10 or fewer students had test scores 17

18 English Language Arts Caucasian 10 73% 83% 85% 85% 77% 73% Percentage Achieving Level 3 and 4: Caucasian 85% 74% 71% 81% 82% 71% 83% 82% 84% 81% 77% 73% 83% 76% 68% 67% 66% 62% 62% 63% 58% '17 HW SL MV LA District 3 8 State 3-8 Mathematics Caucasian 10 Percentage Achieving Level 3 and 4: Caucasian 85% 84% 83% 77% 7 67% 79% 7 67% 63% 82% 79% 73% 74% 76% 72% 75% 71% 74% 75% 73% 59% 55% 55% 55% 51% 55% '17 *** Consistent with state protocols, no score is published because 10 or fewer students had test scores 18

19 English Language Arts Hispanic or Latino 10 Percentage Achieving Level 3 and 4: Hispanic or Latino 43% 48% 45% 59% 49% 47% 44% 47% 44% 35% 3 24% 34% 29% 35% *** HW SL MV LA District 3 8 State 3-8 Mathematics Hispanic or Latino 10 Percentage Achieving Level 3 and 4: Hispanic or Latino 56% 43% 39% 34% 37% 33% 29% 32% 36% 33% 35% 42% 44% 36% 34% 36% 23% 26% 25% 26% 28% 22% 27% *** *** Consistent with state protocols, no score is published because 10 or fewer students had test scores 19

20 English Language Arts Two or More Races 10 88% 76% 77% Percentage Achieving Level 3 and 4: Two or More Races 88% 67% 79% 74% 83% 81% 85% 85% 79% 77% 68% 65% 58% 63% 62% 57% *** *** *** *** *** *** *** '17 HW SL MV LA District 3 8 State 3-8 Mathematics Two or More Races 10 Percentage Achieving Level 3 and 4: Two or More Races 7 65% 62% 75% 55% 62% 81% 78% 78% 63% 63% 58% 57% 56% 54% 55% *** *** *** *** *** *** *** '17 *** Consistent with state protocols, no score is published because 10 or fewer students had test scores 20