2017 College and Career Ready Performance Index (CCRPI)

Transcription

1 2017 College and Career Ready Performance Index (CCRPI)

2 Elementary Scoring

3 Middle Scoring

4 High School Scoring

5 Achievement Scoring How does Georgia Milestones affect the CCRPI? Content Mastery: 40% x 50 =.40 x 50 = 20 4 indicators (8 indicators HS at 2.5 points each) ELA = 3/8* of 20 = 7.5 points Math = 3/8* of 20 = 7.5 points Science = 1/8* of 20 = 2.5 points Social Studies = 1/8* of 20 = 2.5 points Students Scoring at Level 1 receive 0 points (Beginning) Level 2 receive 0.5 points (Developing) Level 3 receive 1 point (Proficient) Level 4 receive 1.5 points (Distinguished)

6 Progress Scoring A student growth percentile (SGP) describes a student s growth relative to academically-similar students. Academically-similar students are other students across Georgia with a similar score history. This ensures a student s starting point is considered when measuring his or her growth. Growth percentiles range from 1 to 99. Lower percentiles indicate lower academic growth and higher percentiles indicate higher academic growth. Uses two years of prior scores, when available. Retest data is not included. All students, regardless of their prior achievement level, have the opportunity to demonstrate all levels of growth.

7 Prior Achievement Student s 2016 Scale Score-4 th Grade Math EOG All students can demonstrate all levels of growth regardless of their achievement level Growth and Prior Achievement Georgia 5 th Grade Students 2017 Mathematics Performance 2017 SGP = Grade 4 Math EOG Score = 715 (Distinguished) 2017 Grade 5 Math EOG Score = 569 (Proficient) 2017 SGP = Grade 4 Math EOG Score = 715 (Distinguished) 2017 Grade 5 Math EOG Score = 725 (Distinguished) 2017 SGP = Grade 4 Math EOG Score = 423 (Beginning) 2017 Grade 5 Math EOG Score = 391 (Beginning) 2017 SGP = Grade 4 Math EOG Score = 423 (Beginning) 2017 Grade 5 Math EOG Score = 564 (Proficient) Growth Student s 2017 Growth Percentiles-5 th Grade Math EOG

8 Student Growth Levels Low (1-34), Typical (35-65), and High (66-99) Levels were set using information about the relationship between student growth and statusbased achievement A student who demonstrates low growth generally will regress academically (i.e., not maintain his/her current level of achievement) A student who demonstrates typical growth generally will maintain or improve academically A student who demonstrates high growth generally will make greater improvement academically 8

9 District 2015 State CCRPI District 2016 State 2016 District 2017 State 2017 District Difference State Difference Elementary Middle High School Total * Difference A.L. Burruss Dunleith Hickory Hills Lockheed MCAA Park Street Sawyer Road West Side MSGA MMS MHS

10 2017 CCRPI District 2015 State 2015 District 2016 State 2016 District 2017 State 2017 District Difference Difference Achievement Progress Achievement Gap ED/EL/SWD ETB Climate Star CCRPI Score State Difference Elementary Middle High School Total This table is for you to put your school s CCRPI data in.

11 From SLDS Why is this relevant today? Students Georgia Milestone scores contribute to the Progress Points for FY18. Growth from will be calculated from the Georgia Milestone scores for grades 4 - HS. Your Georgia Milestones predictor scores from MAP can help guide what your Achievement Points could be as NWEA MAP has a 84% to 88% consistency rate. This information can be found in SLDS as Georgia Milestones and NWEA MAP scores are populated in SLDS.

12 NWEA MAP Student Profile Report Student Growth Goal Setting Create an action plan based on real time data see next slide

13 NWEA MAP Student Profile Report Georgia Milestones Linking Study Prediction for student Create an action plan

14 Principal Share Matt Freeman Susan Graves Kristen Beaudin

15 2018 College and Career Ready Performance Index (CCRPI)

16 Proposed Overall Key Changes Emphasis on student growth and improvement: Progress and Content Mastery Each indicator and component reported on 100-point scale ELA & Math will make up 75% of Content Mastery points Progress & Closing the Gaps components will account for 50% of elementary and middle school and 40% of the high school CCRPI score. Exceeding the Bar is indicators have been eliminated.

17 Indicators The number of indicators have been reduced at each level. School Level Previously Now Elementary Middle School High School 30 15

18 Components for 2018

19 Overall Scoring CCRPI Component Elementary Points Middle School Points High School Points Content Mastery Progress Closing Gaps Readiness Graduation Rate * * 15

20 Content Mastery Scoring (30, 30, 30) Are students achieving at the level necessary to be prepared for the next grade, college, or career? Content Areas: ELA, Math, Science, Social Studies 95% participation rate FAY = Enrolled in 65% of the course Points are earned in this way: Beginner = 0 points Developing =.5 points Proficient = 1.0 point Distinguished = 1.5 points

21 Progress Scoring (35, 35, 30) How much growth are students demonstrating relative to academically-similar students? Student Growth Percentiles in ELA and Math only = 90% SGP 1-29 = 0 points SGP =.5 points SGP = 1.0 point SGP = 1.5 points ELLs: Band Progress on ACCESS for ELLs = 10% Progress towards English language proficiency No progress = 0 points Less than one band =.5 points Growth of one band = 1.0 point Growth of more than one band = 1.5 points

22 Student Growth Percentiles (SGP) SGPs are used to measure the progress in ELA and mathematics SGP Growth Levels Low growth students (1-34) struggle to maintain their academic status Typical growth students (35-65) maintain or improve their academic status High growth students (66-99) make greater improvements in their academic status

23 Prior Achievement Student s 2016 Scale Score-4 th Grade Math EOG All students can demonstrate all levels of growth regardless of their achievement level Growth and Prior Achievement Georgia 5 th Grade Students 2017 Mathematics Performance 2017 SGP = Grade 4 Math EOG Score = 715 (Distinguished) 2017 Grade 5 Math EOG Score = 569 (Proficient) 2017 SGP = Grade 4 Math EOG Score = 715 (Distinguished) 2017 Grade 5 Math EOG Score = 725 (Distinguished) 2017 SGP = Grade 4 Math EOG Score = 423 (Beginning) 2017 Grade 5 Math EOG Score = 391 (Beginning) 2017 SGP = Grade 4 Math EOG Score = 423 (Beginning) 2017 Grade 5 Math EOG Score = 564 (Proficient) Growth Student s 2017 Growth Percentiles-5 th Grade Math EOG

24 Closing the Gaps (15, 15, 10) Are all students and all student subgroups making improvements in achievement rates? Improvement targets will be set for each school and all subgroups, (ED, EL, SWD, ethnic groups). The improvement targets will be based on the prior year s performance. The annual target is a gain not an absolute number; thus, it allows schools to start fresh each year and encourages a continued focus on improvement. School- and district-targets based on 3% of the gap between baseline achievement rates (2017) and 100% (e.g. 100% - 60% achievement = 40% gap x 0.03 = 1.2 points) ED/EL/SWD subgroups can earn 1.5 points for a 6% or higher improvement

25 Flags Flags will be awarded for each subgroup and subject with the following point values: Subgroup Performance Flag Point-Value Did not improve RED 0.0 Improved but missed target YELLOW 0.5 Met target GREEN 1.0

26 Readiness Scoring (20, 20, 15) Are students participating in activities preparing them for and demonstrating readiness for the next level, college, or career? Elementary and MS = Foundational skills (Literacy skills) Beyond the Core: % of students earning credit in fine arts and world language % of students demonstrating reading comprehension at or above lower bound of stretch Lexile band Attendance: % of students absent less than 10% of enrolled days Accelerated: % of graduates earning credit for IB, AP, Dual Enrollment Pathway Completion: % of graduates completing an advanced academic CTAE, fine arts, or world language pathway

27 Readiness Areas

28 Readiness Literacy Indicator New Lexile Targets Grade/Course Previous Lexile Target New Lexile Target: Mid-Points of the College & Career Ready Stretch Lexile Bands Spring 2017 EOG Lexile vs. Spring 2017 MAP Lexile Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade th Literature (340 students) American Literature Too few students NWEA MAP Lexile would be considered more rigorous than the Georgia Milestones.

29 Graduation Rate Scoring (0, 0, 15) Are students graduating from high school with a regular diploma in four or five years? Still includes four and five-year adjusted cohort graduation rates, but elementary and middle school component no longer included Calculation: # of students who graduate with regular diploma # of students in the adjusted cohort

30 Overall Scoring CCRPI Component Elementary Points Middle School Points High School Points Content Mastery Progress Closing Gaps Readiness Graduation Rate * * 15

31 School Climate Schools will still received a 1-5-star rating based on the following four components: 1) student, teacher, and parent perceptions of a school s climate 2) student discipline 3) a safe and substance-free learning environment 4) student attendance

32 Additional Scoring Information Challenge Points ED/EL/SWD Performance will not be included. Exceeding the Bar indicators will not be included. Extra Points Extra points will be earned in Content Mastery and Progress. Student Attendance Attendance will be calculated using a nationally-utilized metricabsent less than 10% of enrolled days. Closing Gaps Closing Gaps will utilize progress towards meeting achievement improvement targets.

33 How can we use this information? Use Achievement Level Descriptors to determine what students must know and be able to do

34 Milestones Resources Use the state assessment guides and study guides to determine how to teach the standards.

35 Collaborative Activity How to use the SLDS to identify students connected to MAP to help predict ACT/EOG/CCRPI scores for Spring Login to SLDS through Aspen (see next slides). Questions to consider Where do my students fall? College predictor (ACT)? End of Grade (EOG)? What intentional action do you see for these students? Is there a teacher concern? What are my next steps?

36 Finding MAP in the SLDS through Aspen Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 ACT Predictor EOG Predictor NPR Results

37 Impersonating a Teacher in SLDS Step 1 Scroll down to bottom of page Step 3 Pick a teacher Step 2 Click on Step 4 Scroll down and click on

38 Collaborative Activity How to use the SLDS to identify students connected to MAP to help predict ACT/EOG/CCRPI scores? Login to SLDS through Aspen (see next slides). Questions to consider Where do my students fall? College predictor (ACT)? End of Grade (EOG)? What intentional action do you see for these students? Is there a teacher concern? What are my next steps?