2017 Achievement Results for Dayton City

Transcription

1 IRN: Address: 217 Achievement Results for Dayton City S Ludlow St Dayton, OH County: ITC: District Type: State Test Indicators Met Students Took Test At Least Proficient % Proficient Montgomery NWOCA City State Standard State Indicator Met? 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade High School Reading Mathematics Reading Mathematics Social Studies Reading Mathematics Science Reading Mathematics Social Studies Reading Mathematics Reading Mathematics Science Government History Physical Science English I English II Algebra I Geometry Math I Math II Biology % 8.% NOT MET % 8.% NOT MET % 8.% NOT MET % 8.% NOT MET % 8.% NOT MET % 8.% NOT MET % 8.% NOT MET % 8.% NOT MET % 8.% NOT MET % 8.% NOT MET % 8.% NOT MET % 8.% NOT MET % 8.% NOT MET % 8.% NOT MET % 8.% NOT MET % 8.% NOT MET % 8.% NOT MET 1, % 8.% NOT MET 12.% 8.% NOT MET 1, % 8.% NOT MET 1, % 8.% NOT MET 1, % 8.% NOT MET 1, % 8.% NOT MET 2 NC 8.% N/A 1 1 NC 8.% N/A 1, % 8.% NOT MET Analyze... GITED INDICATOR Analyze... Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4 AM page 1 of 5

2 indicators met of a possible 25.% A = % GRADE B = % C = % D = % = % Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4 AM page 2 of 5

3 Performance Index Test Count by Level Count of All Tests Pct Weight Points Untested 27 / 17,33 x 1 = 1.2 x. =. Limited Basic Proficient Accelerated Advanced 8,242 3,944 2,779 1, / / / / / 17,33 17,33 17,33 17,33 17,33 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = x.3 = x.6 = x 1. = x 1.1 = x 1.2 = Advanced Plus 27 / 17,33 x 1 =.2 x 1.3 =.2 Analyze points of a possible % A = % GRADE B = % C = % D = % = % Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4 AM page 3 of 5

4 Indicators Met contributes 25% to the Achievement Component Grade, while Performance Index Score contributes 75% of the Achievement Component Grade. If a district has only one measure, then that one graded measure is used for the component. If neither measure is graded, then the component also is not graded. Indicators Percent to Points Grade Percentage Points A B C D 97.5% - 1.% 5 95.% % % % % % % % 4 85.% % % % % % % % 3 75.% % % % % % % % 2 6.% % % % % % % % 1 25.% % % %.% % Component Grade.5 Performance Index Percent to Points Grade Percentage Points A B C D 95.% - 1.% % % % % % - 9.9% % % 4 85.% % % % % % % % 3 75.% % % % % % % % 2 6.% % % % % % % % 1 3.% % % %.% %.5 Indicator Weighted Points: Performance Index. x 25% =. Weighted Points: 1. x 75% =.75 District Achievement Grade Points: GRADE A = B = C = D = = Click here to see the Secure Data Center - Status of Reports report Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4 AM page 4 of 5

5 Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4 AM page 5 of 5

6 217 District Details for Dayton City Educators in your District Your District's Principals Staff Per 1 Students Percentage of principals with at least a Bachelor's Degree 1.% School Counselors School Nurses School Psychologists Interpreters Library or Media Specialists Audiologist Physical/Occupational Therapist Social Worker General Education Teachers Career-Technical Teachers Special Education Teachers Teacher Aides Gifted Intervention Specialists ine Arts Teachers Music Teachers Physical Education Teachers ELL Specialists Adaptive Physical Education Teachers Speech Language Pathologists Percentage of principals with at least a Master's Degree 96.% Lead or Senior Teachers 14. Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4:37 AM page 1 of 3

7 Teacher & Principal Evaluations Count Accomplished Skilled Developing Ineffective Not Completed Teachers % % 38.6% 14.3%.8% 1.% Not Complete Accomplished Skilled Developing Ineffective Count Accomplished Skilled Developing Ineffective Not Completed Principals % % 7.4% 7.4%.% 3.7% Not Complete Accomplished Skilled Developing Ineffective Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4:37 AM page 2 of 3

8 School Choice Options: Place of Enrollment for Students Residing in the District The School Choice Options data is a set of nine counts describing the place of enrollment for students residing in the school district, captured as a snapshot of a single day in the school year. Web links provide further information about certain options. Districts and STEM Schools 12,161 students enrolled in the district where they lived 939 students enrolled in another public district through Open Enrollment 84 students enrolled in another public district by means other than Open Enrollment 2,59 Non-Public Schools* students participated in the EdChoice Scholarship or Cleveland Scholarship Program 49 students participated in the EdChoice Expansion Program 97 Students participated in the Ohio Autism Scholarship or Jon Peterson Special Needs Scholarship Program Community Schools 1,11 students enrolled in an online community school *ODE does not collect and cannot report information on district residents who are nonvoucher students attending a non-public school. 5,662 students enrolled in a sitebased community school 455 students enrolled in a Dropout Prevention and Recovery Program (online or site-based) Click here to see the Secure Data Center - Status of Reports report Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4:37 AM page 3 of 3

9 IRN: Address: S Ludlow St Dayton, OH inancial Data for Dayton City County: ITC: District Type: Montgomery NWOCA City Classroom Instruction Non-Classroom Classroom Spending $123,442, % $75,14, % 37.8 Total $198,582, Analyze Rank in Comparison Group for Pct Spending on Classroom Instruction: 15 out of 15 Equivalent Expenditures per Pupil, based on a weighted ADM, will be displayed on your district's inancial Data page of the Report Card as "Spending per Pupil". Equivalent Enrollment Classroom Instruction Expend per Pupil Non-Classroom Expend per Pupil Operating Spending per Pupil Spending per Pupil 19,342. Enrollment $6,382.1 $3,884.8 $1,266.9 Source of unds The "historical" method of calculating Expenditure per Pupil, based on year end ADM, will be available only in the Advanced Reports section of the Report Card. Classroom Instruction Expend per Pupil Non-Classroom Expend per Pupil "Historical" Expend per Pupil 13,325.1 $9,263.9 $5,639. $14,92.9 Local State $59,711, % $192,774, % ederal $36,596, % 2.1 Other Non-Tax $7,857, % Total Revenue $296,94, Click here to see the Secure Data Center - Status of Reports report Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4 AM page 1 of 1

10 217 Gap Closing Report for Dayton City Annual Measurable Objectives The Annual Measurable Objectives score is determined using multiple data points. or each student subgroup, the district's results are compared to the statewide Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). "Points" are earned based on how the district compared to the AMO, to their results last year (improvement), and to how far they were from meeting the AMO (the "gap"). These points are averaged to determine a preliminary letter grade, which may be demoted by one letter grade if certain minimum performance requirements are not met. AMO - English Language Arts Proficiency Subgroup Metrics Took Test All Students Economically Disadvantaged Asian or Pacific Islander African American American Indian or Alaskan Native Hispanic Multiracial White IEP LEP STR Prof ALT Prof ALT Cap Demote Net Prof Prof % Goal Gap Took Test LY STR Prof LY ALT Prof LY Net Prof LY Prof LY % Improve Points 5,987 1, , ,71 1, , ,914 1, , ,556 1, , , , NR 77.1 NR NR NR NR , , , , Total of Subgroup Points: 59.9 Possible Subgroup Points: 9. English Language Arts Points Earned (Total / Possible): If [Prof %] is greater than the Goal, then 1. points are earned and the Gap is not applicable (N/A). If not, the Gap is the difference between [Prof %] and the Goal. Subgroups of less than 3 students are Not Rated (NR). 2. Improvement from last year's result is [Prof %] minus [Prof LY %]. If Improvement is greater than the Gap, then 1. points are earned. 3. Otherwise, partial points are awarded using the formula (Improvement / Gap) * 1. It is impossible to earn more than 1 or less than zero points. 4. After all subgroup points have been calculated, they are added together. The total is divided by the maximum points possible (1 x number of subgroups that were not NR) to determine the final points for English Language Arts. Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4:37 AM page 1 of 6

11 AMO - Math Proficiency Subgroup Metrics All Students Economically Disadvantaged Asian or Pacific Islander African American American Indian or Alaskan Native Hispanic Multiracial White IEP LEP Took Test STR Prof ALT Prof ALT Cap Demote Net Prof Prof % Goal Gap Took Test LY STR Prof LY ALT Prof LY Net Prof LY Prof LY % Improve Points NR 72. NR NR NR NR Total of Subgroup Points: 69.2 Possible Subgroup Points: 9. Math Points Earned (Total / Possible): If [Prof %] is greater than the Goal, then 1. points are earned and the Gap is not applicable (N/A). If not, the Gap is the difference between [Prof %] and the Goal. Subgroups of less than 3 students are Not Rated (NR). 2. Improvement from last year's result is [Prof %] minus [Prof LY %]. If Improvement is greater than the Gap, then 1. points are earned. 3. Otherwise, partial points are awarded using the formula (Improvement / Gap) * 1. It is impossible to earn more than 1 or less than zero points. 4. After all subgroup points have been calculated, they are added together. The total is divided by the maximum points possible (1 x number of subgroups that were not NR) to determine the final points for Math. Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4:37 AM page 2 of 6

12 AMO - Graduation Rate Subgroup Metrics Grads All Students Economically Disadvantaged Asian or Pacific Islander African American American Indian or Alaskan Native Hispanic Multiracial White IEP LEP Non-Grads Cohort Students Grad Rate % Goal Gap Grads LY Non-Grads LY Cohort Students LY Grad Rate LY % Improve Points NR 85.1 NR NR NR NR NR 85.1 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 85.1 NR NR NR NR Total of Subgroup Points: 47.3 Possible Subgroup Points: 6. Graduation Rate Points Earned (Total / Possible): If [Grad Rate %] is greater than the Goal, then 1. points are earned and the Gap is not applicable (N/A). If not, the Gap is the difference between [Grad Rate %] and the Goal. Subgroups of less than 3 students are Not Rated (NR). 2. Improvement from last year's result is [Grad Rate %] minus [Grad Rate LY %]. If Improvement is greater than the Gap, then 1. points are earned. 3. Otherwise, partial points are awarded using the formula (Improvement / Gap) * 1. It is impossible to earn more than 1 or less than zero points. 4. After all subgroup points have been calculated, they are added together. The total is divided by the maximum points possible (1 x number of subgroups that were not NR) to determine the final points for Graduation Rate. Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4:37 AM page 3 of 6

13 AMO - Preliminary Score The preliminary score is the average of the English Language Arts, Math, and Graduation Rate from the preceding pages. The result is applied to the grading scale to determine a prelininary letter grade. English Language Arts Points: Math Points: Graduation Rate Points: 7.9 Preliminary Score: 7.4 Grade Scale: Preliminary Grade: A = % B = % C = % D = % = % AMO - Letter Grade Demotions Proficiency & Graduation Rate The minimum score for English Language Arts Proficiency, Math Proficiency, and Graduation Rate is 7.%. If the preliminary grade is "A" and any subgroup does not meet this requirement, a letter grade demotion occurs. Subgroup Metrics Reading Prof % All Students American Indian or Alaskan Native Hispanic Multiracial White IEP LEP Math Prof % Grad Rate % Economically Disadvantaged Asian or Pacific Islander NR This data is not shown because the African American preliminary grade is not an "A", so this NR NR NR demotion type is not 31. applicable NR NR Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4:37 AM page 4 of 6

14 AMO - Letter Grade Demotions (continued) Subgroup Metrics All Students Economically Disadvantaged Asian or Pacific Islander African American American Indian or Alaskan Native Hispanic Multiracial White IEP LEP Required to Participate Participated Participation Rates The minimum Participation Rate is 95.%. If any subgroup does not meet this requirement in either English Language Arts or Math, a letter grade demotion occurs. Participation Rate is not calculated if a subgroup does not have at least 4 students required to take the test. English Language Arts Participation Rate % 6,597 6, ,524 6, NR 4,183 4, NR ,729 1, ,326 1, Subgroup Metrics All Students Economically Disadvantaged Asian or Pacific Islander African American American Indian or Alaskan Native Hispanic Multiracial White IEP LEP Math Required to Participate Participated Participation Rate % 6,389 6, ,331 6, NR 4,8 4, NR ,655 1, ,33 1, AMO - inal Score and Letter Grade If a letter grade demotion is required, then the preliminary score is reduced by 1. points to determine the final score. The final score is applied to the rating scale to determine the final grade. (Note: If the preliminary score is 1. then the final score is set to 89.9, the maximum score for earning a "B".) Preliminary Grade: Demotion Required? No inal Score: 4 6 Grade Scale: A B = = % C = % D = % 69.9% = % GRADE Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4:37 AM page 5 of 6

15 Gap Closing Component Grade The AMO Measure contributes 1% to the Gap Closing Component Grade. If a district has no AMO measure grade, then there is no Gap Closing component grade. AMO Percent to Points Grade Percentage Points A B 97.5% - 1.% 5 95.% % % % % % % % 4 85.% % % % % % 3.25 Although not needed to calculate the Gap Closing grade, points will be assigned to the AMO measure in 218 as part of determining an Overall Report Card grade. The points table is included here for reference, but is part of no calculation this school year A = B = C = D = Grade Scale: GRADE = % % 3 C 75.% % % % % % 2.25 Because the Gap Closing component consists only of AMOs, the Gap Closing Grade is the same as the AMO grade. 67.5% % 2 65.% % 1.75 D 62.5% % % % % % 1 3.% % % %.5.% % Click here to see the Secure Data Center - Status of Reports report Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4:37 AM page 6 of 6

16 217 Gifted Students Data for Dayton City Gifted Indicator The Gifted Indicator is derived from three components: Gifted Value Added grade, the Performance Index for gifted students, and a Gifted Inputs score. Gifted Value Added Grade: District Enrollment (ADM): 13,325 Value Added Met?: Gifted Value Added A Met Districts must earn a Gifted Value Added grade of C or better to meet the Gifted Value Added component. A grade of "NR" results in Not Met if the district has an ADM of 6 or more. Gifted Performance I ndex The Performance Index calculation for gifted students. Only tests taken by students identified as gifted in that subject (e.g. gifted in Math and taking the Math test), or taken by students identified with Super Cognitive abilities regardless of test subject are included. Test Count by Level Count of All Tests Pct Weight Points Untested 4 / 478 x 1 =.8 x. =. Limited Basic Proficient Accelerated Advanced / / / / / x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = x.3 = x.6 = x 1. = x 1.1 = x 1.2 = Advanced Plus 27 / 478 x 1 = 5.6 x 1.3 = Performance Index Met?: Not Met Districts with at least 1 unique students in the Gifted Performance Index calculation must score 117. or better to meet the Gifted Performance Index component Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4 AM page 1 of 4

17 Gifted I nputs The Gifted Inputs calculation assigns points based on the percentage of students identified and served in eight categories (factors). The points earned for each category are totaled to determine the final Met/Not Met determination for the Gifted Input component. actor 1: Percent of students identified with the reading, math, science, social studies, and superior cognitive gifted labels K IDed Total 4,199 4,386 3,781 Pct Points < 1% 1-1.9% 2-4.9% 5-9.9% % 15% actor 2: Percent of students with the reading, math, science, social studies, and superior cognitive gifted labels receiving gifted services K Served IDed Pct Points < 1% % % % % 8% actor 3: Percent of students identified with the visual and performing arts or creative thinking gifted labels K IDed Total 4,199 4,386 3,781 Pct Points < 2% 2-4.9% 5-5.9% 6-6.9% 7% actor 4: Percent of students with the visual and performing arts or creative thinking gifted labels receiving gifted services K Served IDed Pct Points < 1% % % 4%+ 1 2 Less than 2% Identified 1 1 Less than 1 2% Identified Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4 AM page 2 of 4

18 actor 5: Identification of disadvantaged students IDed 866 Total 12,367 Pct 7. Points < 2% 2-4.9% 5-9.9% % 15% actor 6: Services to disadvantaged students identified as gifted Served IDed Pct 73.5 Points < 5% 5-9.9% % % % % %+ 6 actor 7: Identification of minority students IDed 523 Total 9,327 Pct 5.6 Points < 2% 2-4.9% 5-9.9% % 15% actor 8: Services to minority students identified as gifted Served IDed Pct 73.8 Points < 5% 5-9.9% % % % % %+ 6 Total Points: Gifted Inputs Met?: 57 Not Met Districts must earn 8 or 2 more points to meet the Gifted I nputs component Gifted Indicator inal Result The Gifted Indicator is Met if none of the three components are Not Met. Gifted Inputs alone cannot determine the Gifted Indicator, however; if both the Value Added and Performance Index components are NC, then the Gifted Indicator is also NC. INDICATOR Not Met Value Added Met?: Performance Index Met?: Gifted Inputs Met?: Met Not Met Not Met Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4 AM page 3 of 4

19 Additional Gifted Student Information Overview Total Enrollment (ADM): 12,366.6 Identified as Gifted: Receiving Gifted Services: Identified, Not Receiving Gifted Services: % 1.9% 5.1% Not Identified as Gifted Identified, Not Receiving Services Receiving Gifted Services Proficiency Level Advanced Plus Advanced Accelerated Proficient Basic Limited Metrics Reading Math Science Social Studies Achievement This data illustrates the test achievement levels by students identified as gifted in that test's subject. or example, how well do students identified as gifted in Reading do on the Reading achievement tests? 1% 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % 16.7%.% 13.6% 3.7% 2.7% 4.4% 4.4% 1.3% 18.6% 4.5% 37.5% 4.5% 39.7% 36.4% 35.5% 33.3% 4.9% 36.% 32.8% 12.5% 5.9% 6.% Social.% Studies Science.% Math Reading Advanced Plus Advanced Accelerated Proficient Basic Limited Click here to see the Secure Data Center - Status of Reports report Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4 AM page 4 of 4

20 IRN: Address: S Ludlow St Dayton, OH Graduation Rates for Dayton City County: ITC: District Type: Montgomery NWOCA City 4-Year Graduation Rate The 4-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 216 who graduated within four years, i.e. students who entered the 9th grade in 213 and graduated by 216. Class of 216 Graduates: 715 Students Countable in Class of Graduation Rate: GRADE A = % B = % C = % D = % = % 5-Year Graduation Rate The 5-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 215 who graduated within five years, i.e. students who entered the 9th grade in 212 and graduated by 216. Class of 215 Graduates: 778 Students Countable in Class of Graduation Rate: GRADE A = % B = % C = % D = % = % Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4:37 AM page 1 of 3

21 Component Grade 4-year Graduation Rate contributes 6% to the Graduation Component Grade, while 5-Year Graduation Rate contributes 4%. If a district has only one of those measures, then that measure contributes 1%. If neither measure is graded, then the Component Grade is Not Rated 4-Year Points Earned Grade Percentage Points 98.25% - 1.% % % 4.75 A 94.75% % % % % % 4 91.% % 3.75 B 9.% % % % % % % % 2.75 C 85.25% % % % % % % % 1.75 D 8.25% % % % % % % % % %.5.% % 5-Year Points Earned Grade Percentage Points 98.75% - 1.% % % 4.75 A 96.25% % % % % % % % 3.75 B 91.25% % % % % % % % 2.75 C 86.25% % % % % % % % 1.75 D 81.25% % % % % % 1 4.% %.75 2.% %.5.% % 4-Year Weighted Graduation Points: 5-Year Weighted 1. x 6% =.6 Graduation Points: 1. x 4% =.4 District Graduation Grade Points: 1. Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4:37 AM Click here to see the Secure Data Center - Status of Reports report 5 4 A = B = C = D = = GRADE page 2 of 3

22 Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4:37 AM page 3 of 3

23 4 8 1, , , ,2 217 K-3 Literacy Data for Dayton City IRN: Not On-Track at Point A Improving to On-Track at Point B GRADE Kindergarten Reading Diagnostic, School Year to 1st Grade Reading Diagnostic, School Year D 1st Grade Reading Diagnostic, School Year to 2nd Grade Reading Diagnostic, School Year K-3 Literacy 2nd Grade Reading Diagnostic, School Year rd Grade Reading Diagnostic, School Year to 65 to 3rd Grade Reading Diagnostic, School Year rd Grade Reading OST, School Year Deduction for 3rd graders who did not pass OST and were not on a Reading Improvement and Monitoring Plan % 45 out of 1,888 Totals 1, Analyze... Students On-Track in Reading Diagnostic % % % % <= -1.6% This chart shows the overall percentage of students that were on-track/not-on-track for each grade level reading diagnostic in A = B = C = D = = KG st Grade 2nd Grade 3rd Grade On-Track Not On-Track Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4:37 AM K3 Literacy Component Grade The K-3 Literacy measure contributes 1% to the K-3 Literacy Component Grade. If a district has no K-3 Literacy measure grade, then there is no K-3 Literacy component grade. page 1 of 2

24 K-3 Literacy Percent to Points (215 Average) Grade Percentage Points 93.7% - 1.% % % 4.75 A 81.% % % % % % 4 62.% % 3.75 B 55.6% % % % % % % % 2.75 C 3.2% % % % % % % % 1.75 D 4.8% % % % % % 1-5.% % % %.5 < -7.5% Although not needed to calculate the K-3 Literacy grade, points will be assigned to the K-3 Literacy measure in 218 as part of determining an Overall Report Card grade. The points table is included here for reference, but is part of no calculation this school year A = B = C = D = = GRADE D Grade Scale: Because the K-3 Literacy component consists only of one grade, the K-3 Literacy component grade is the same as the measure grade. Click here to see the Secure Data Center - Status of Reports report Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4:37 AM page 2 of 2

25 217 Prepared for Success Data for Dayton City IRN: How Prepared was Your 216 Graduating Class? These data represent students in the 4-year and 5-year graduation cohorts, i.e. students who entered 9th grade in 212 and 213. Denominator (4- and 5-Year Graduation Cohorts): ACT: Participation ACT: Remediation ree SAT: Participation SAT: Remediation ree Honors Diploma Industry-Recognized Credential Advanced Placement: Participation AP: Exam Score of 3 or Better Dual Enrollment Credit International Baccalaureate IB: Exam Score of 4 or Better 1,962 Student Pct 1, Students from the Class of 214 Who Enrolled in College within Two Years of Graduation Students from the Class of 21 Who Graduated from College within Six Years of Leaving High School Student Enroll Pct Student Grads Pct Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4:37 AM page 1 of 3

26 ACT: Participation ACT: Remediation ree SAT: Participation SAT: Remediation ree Honors Diploma Industry-Recognized Credential Advanced Placement: Participation AP: Exam Score of 3 or Better Dual Enrollment Credit International Baccalaureate IB: Exam Score of 4 or Better Enrolled in College within 2 Years Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4:37 AM page 2 of 3

27 Number of students that earned a remediation free score on all parts of the ACT or SAT, earned an honors diploma, and/or earned an industryrecognized credential Number of Students Point Value Points Earned The number of "bonus" students that count an additional.3 bonus points each, because they did the above and also earned a 3 or higher on at least one AP exam; earned a 4 or higher on at least one IB exam; and/or earned at least three college credits before leaving high school Grade Percentage Points A B C D 97.5% - 1.% 5 95.% % % % % % % % 4 8.% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 2 35.% % % % % % % % % % % %.% % Click here to see the Secure Data Center - Status of Reports report Total Points: Graduation Cohort: A = B = C = D = = ,962 Percentage: 12.3% GRADE Grade Scale: Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4:37 AM page 3 of 3

28 IRN: Address: S Ludlow St Dayton, OH Progress Data for Dayton City County: ITC: District Type: Montgomery NWOCA City Overall This measures the progress for all students in math and reading, grades 4-8. GRADE Subgroup Metrics Grade Gifted Students A Overall All Grades 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade High School Progress Score (Gain Index) Reading Mathematics Social Science All Tests English I English II Algebra I Geometry Studies This measures the progress for students identified as gifted in reading, math, and/or superior cognitive ability. GRADE Subgroup Metrics Progress Score (Gain Index) Grade Reading Gifted All Grades 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade High School Students in the Lowest 2% of Achievement Mathematic s Social Studies This measures the progress for students identified as the lowest 2% statewide in reading and math achievement. GRADE Subgroup Metrics Grade Lowest 2% All Grades 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade High School Science All Tests English I English II Algebra I Geometry Reading Mathematic s Social Studies Progress Score (Gain Index) Science All Tests English I English II Algebra I Geometry Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4:37 AM page 1 of 3

29 Students with Disabilities This measures the progress for students with disabilities. GRADE Subgroup Metrics Grade High School Students w/ Disabilities All Grades 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade High School This measures the progress for students in high school. Reading Mathematic s Social Studies Progress Score (Gain Index) Science All Tests English I English II Algebra I Geometry GRADE Coming in 218 No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data. No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data. Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4:37 AM page 2 of 3

30 Progress Component Grade Points are assigned to assigned to the Overall, Gifted, Lowest 2%, and Students with Disabilities Value Added grades. A = 5 points B = 4 points C = 3 points D = 2 points = 1 point The weighting for each subgroup's points varies depending on how many subgroups were graded. If you have this many subgroups Then the "Overall" subgroup is weighted 55% 63.25% 71.5% 1% And the other subgroups are weighted 15% % 28.5% N/A Subgroup Grade Points Weight inal Points Overall Gifted Lowest 2% Students w/ Disab A % 15.% 15.% 15.% Total Points A = B = C = D = = Grade Scale: GRADE D Click here to see the Secure Data Center - Status of Reports report Note: If any subgroup grade is C, D, or, then the final grade can be no higher than B. Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4:37 AM page 3 of 3

31 217 Third Grade Reading Guarantee Report for Dayton City IRN: Students Subject to Meeting the Third Grade Reading Guarantee Threshold Metrics Student Student % Met the TGRG Promotion Threshold Did Not Meet the TGRG Promotion Threshold Total Met Minimum Threshold on all/spring Test Met Comparable Bar on Alternative Test Retained by district, still enrolled in district in the fall Retained by district, no longer enrolled in district Inconsistent Retention/Assessment Data Reported % % 4 5.5% % % %.% % Analyze... Percentages are based on the students subject to meeting the Third Grade Reading Guarantee threshold. The Total % for "Met the TGRG Promotion Threshold" is what will be reported on the Report Card. Students Excluded from the Third Grade Reading Guarantee Calculation Metrics Student Student % Exempt from TGRG Promotion Threshold % Not Retained, ELL Exemption 4.5% Not Retained, IEP Exemption % Not Retained, Prior Retention Exemption % Not Retained, Significant Cognitive Disabilities Exemption 8.9% Student accelerated beyond grade 3 reading 2.2% Analyze... Percentages are based on all students for whom Third Grade Reading Guarantee data is available. Both of these tables count students based on the Third Grade Reading Guarantee's modified ull Academic Year rules. Click here to see the Secure Data Center - Status of Reports report Data Refreshed: 9/8/217 6:4:37 AM page 1 of 1