District Test Results Spring 2018 Administra9ons

Transcription

1 District Test Results Spring 2018 Administra9ons Annual Presentation of Standardized Test Results Dumont Public Schools September 20,

2 DUMONT HIGH SCHOOL COLLEGE BOARD RESULTS 2

3 DUMONT HIGH SCHOOL COLLEGE BOARD RESULTS Dumont High School AP Scholar Roster 2018 Total AP Test Takers= 175 Total AP Students with Scores of 3+= 75.% Total Scholars= 2 (avg. score 3.75) AP Scholars 22 Score of 3 or Higher on 3 or more AP Exams AP Scholars with Honor 10 Score of 3 or Higher on or more AP exams and an overall average of at least

4 DUMONT HIGH SCHOOL COLLEGE BOARD RESULTS AP Five-Year School Score Summary (2018) Print / Download Options This report shows five years of data at the school, state and global levels. On the first page, a graph illustrates the year-over-year change in the percentage of AP students with scores of 3 or higher, next to a table that provides the overall total exams, total unique students and both the number and percentage of AP students with one or more scores of 3 or higher. On subsequent pages, the report provides subject-specific summary data by year: total exams, total exams by score and mean score. Data Updated Sep 15, 2018, Report Run Sep 19, 2018 Dumont High School (310275) % of Total AP Students % of Total AP Students with Scores Dumont High School (310275) New Jersey Global Dumont High School (310275) Total AP Students Number of Exams AP Students with Scores % of Total AP Students with Scores New Jersey Total AP Students 62,730 67,351 71,72 76,657 79,62 Number of Exams 119, , ,8 19,06 155,820 AP Students with Scores 3+ 6,528 9,010 51,56 5,286 56,920 % of Total AP Students with Scores Global Total AP Students 2,352,026 2,97,16 2,625,319 2,762,293 2,830,917 Number of Exams,199,5,516,0,71,566 5,006,273 5,11,37 AP Students with Scores 3+ 1,2,136 1,515,26 1,583,115 1,666,078 1,736,303 % of Total AP Students with Scores Success on an AP Exam is defined as an exam score of 3 or higher, which represents the score point that research finds predictive of college success and college graduation. These findings have held consistent across the decades. One example of such a study comes from the National Center for Educational Accountability, which found that an AP Exam score, and a score of 3 or higher in particular, is a strong predictor of a student s ability to persist in college and earn a bachelor s degree. The data in this report differs from other College Board reports, such as The AP Cohort Data Report, which tracks exams taken by seniors throughout their time in high school (cohort-based) and includes public school data only The College Board. College Board, AP, Advanced Placement, Advanced Placement Program, and the acorn logo are registered trademarks of the College Board. 1

5 NJ ACCESS FOR ELLS 2.0 RESULTS TOTAL TEST TAKERS in Grades K through 12 =8 KINDERGARTEN-PAPER BASED TEST GRADES 1-12-ONLINE TEST *6 LEVELS OF PROFICIENCY ON TEST 1=ENTERING 2=EMERGING 3=DEVELOPING =EXPANDING 5=BRIDGING 6=REACHING 63.6 % OF ELL TEST TAKERS DEMONSTRATED GROWTH IN THEIR PROGRESS TO LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY DISTRICT MET AND EXCEEDED THE STATE TARGET IN THIS AREA 5

6 DYNAMIC LEARNING MAPS (DLM) RESULTS TOTAL STUDENT SCORE REPORTS = 1 ( grades 3-8) *Four Performance Levels: EMERGING APPROACHING the TARGET AT TARGET ADVANCED For English Language Arts, 6% of students skills in grades 3 through 8 were emerging, 29% were approaching the target, and 7% were advanced. For Math, 79% of students skills in grades 3 through 8 were emerging, 1% were approaching the target, and 7% were at target. For Science, 100% of students skills in grades 5 and 8 were emerging. 6

7 NEW JERSEY STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT FOR SCIENCE NJSLA-S! 2018 Pilot Test Only -*Individual Student Results are not available! All students Grades 5, 8, & 11 were tested last Spring.! District Results from prior year NJASK (Grades, 8, & HS Biology) will be used for Accountability Purposes. 7

8 PARCC Results: Spring 2018 Administra9ons Measuring College and Career Readiness 8

9 PARCC PERFORMANCE LEVELS! Level 1: Not yet meeting grade-level expectations! Level 2: Partially meeting grade-level expectations! Level 3: Approaching grade-level expectations! Level : grade-level expectations! Level 5: Exceeding grade-level expectations

10 Comparison of Dumont s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy - Percentages Grade Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level 2016 Level 2017 Level 2018 Level Level Level Total% of Lvl & Total% of Lvl & Total % of Lvl & * (+13.6) 77.5 (+7.3) 79.5 (-.) 71.1 (+.3) 78.6 (+3) 79.5 (+1.1) 77.5 (+.1) 6. (+3.9) 32. (-23) *Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test. **Level and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready. Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

11 Comparison of Dumont s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics - Percentages Grade Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level Level 2016 Level 2017 Level 2018 Level Level Level Total% of Lvl & Total% of Lvl & Total % of Lvl & * ALG I GEO ALG II (+.9) 60.8 (+5) 61.6 (+3.6) 9.7 (n/c) 5.3 (+1.9) 9.3 (-3.) 68.3 (+.2) 8.5 (+3.2) 37.3 (-5.5) *Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students in grade 8 par9cipated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representa9ve of grade 8 performance as a whole. **Level and Level 5 is an indica9on a student is on pace to be college and career ready. Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. ALG 1 Is Algebra 1; GEO is Geometry; ALG II is Algebra 2.

12 DUMONT SCHOOL DISTRICT 2018 SPRING PARCC SCHOOL- & GRADE-LEVEL OUTCOMES ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY Grade 3 Level Grade Level Grade 5 Level Grade 6 Level Grade 7 Level Grade 8 Level Grade 9 Level Grade 10 % >= Level Grade 11 % >= Level District Grant * * * * * * Honiss * * * Lincoln * * * * * * Selzer * * * DHS * * * * * *

13 DUMONT SCHOOL DISTRICT 2018 SPRING PARCC SCHOOL- & GRADE-LEVEL OUTCOMES MATHEMATICS Grade 3 Level Grade Level Grade 5 Level Grade 6 Level Grade 7 Level Grade 8 Level Algebra I Level Algebra II Level Geometry Level District Grant * * * * * * Honiss * * Lincoln * * * * * * Selzer * * DHS * * * * * *

14 GRANT SCHOOL 2017/2018 SPRING PARCC SCHOOL- & GRADE-LEVEL COMPARISON DATA ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS & MATH Grade 3 Level Grade Level Grade 5 Level Grade 6 Level Grade 7 Level Grade 8 Level Grade 9 Level Grade 10 % >= Level Grade 11 % >= Level Grant ELA (+13.2) 83.1 (+23.1) 81.8 (+1.8) * * * * * * Grant ELA Grant Math (+6.5) 67.6 (+12.6) 69.7 (+.7) * * * * * * Grant Math * * * * * *

15 HONISS SCHOOL 2017/2018 SPRING PARCC SCHOOL- & GRADE-LEVEL COMPARISON DATA ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS & MATH Grade 3 Level Grade Level Grade 5 Level Grade 6 Level Grade 7 Level Grade 8 Level Grade 9 Level Grade 10 % >= Level Grade 11 % >= Level Honiss ELA 2018 Honiss ELA 2017 Honiss Math 2018 Honiss Math (+25.) 62.5 (-12.5) 79.1 (-7.9) 69.9 (+.9) 76.7 (-.3) 82.6 (+2.6) * * * * * * 62.8 (+9.8) 53.1 (-.9) 65.1 (-.9) 9.5 (-1.5) 57.8 (+.8) 5 (-3) 100 (n/c) * * * *

16 LINCOLN SCHOOL 2017/2018 SPRING PARCC SCHOOL- & GRADE-LEVEL COMPARISON DATA ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS & MATH Grade 3 Level Grade Level Grade 5 Level Grade 6 Level Grade 7 Level Grade 8 Level Grade 9 Level Grade 10 % >= Level Grade 11 % >= Level Lincoln ELA 2018 Lincoln ELA 2017 Lincoln Math 2018 Lincoln Math (+5.8) 9.1 (+23.1) 72.1 (-15.9) (+3.5) 73.5 (+28.5) 1.9 (-5.1) * * * * * * * * * * * *

17 SELZER SCHOOL 2017/2018 SPRING PARCC SCHOOL- & GRADE-LEVEL COMPARISON DATA ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS & MATH Grade 3 Level Grade Level Grade 5 Level Grade 6 Level Grade 7 Level Grade 8 Level Grade 9 Level Grade 10 % >= Level Grade 11 % >= Level Selzer ELA (+3.) 77.1 (-5.9) 8.2 (+17.2) 72.6 (+2.6) 81.3 (+7.3) 75 (-3) * * * Selzer ELA * * * Selzer Math (-3.2) 8.6 (-19.) 65.8 (+15.8) 50 (+2) 9. (-1.6) 5.7 (-3.3) 100 (+) * * Selzer Math * *

18 Comparison of Dumont s Number of Students Tested Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy Grade Students Tested 2018 Students Tested 2017 Difference between number of students tested in 2017 and No change * TOTAL 1,76 1,71 +5 *Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test. Note: Students Tested represents individual valid test scores for English Language Arts/Literacy. 18

19 Comparison of Dumont s Number of Students Tested Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC AdministraMons MathemaMcs Grade Students Tested 2018 Students Tested 2017 Difference between number of students tested in 2017 and No change * Algebra I Algebra II Geometry TOTAL 1,77 1, *Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8 th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. Notes: Students Tested represents individual valid test scores for Mathematics. 19

20 GRADES 3-8 DISTRICT SUBGROUP RESULTS

21 DUMONT PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES DISTRICT GRADE 3 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet (Level 1) Partially (Level 2) Approaching (Level 3) (Level ) Exceeding (Level 5) District Level State %>= Lvl All Students White Black or African American Asian Hispanic Students with Disabilities ELL Students * * * * * * Economically Disadvantaged

22 DUMONT PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES DISTRICT GRADE 3 MATHEMATICS Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet (Level 1) Partially (Level 2) Approaching (Level 3) (Level ) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District Level State %>=LVL All Students White Black or African American Asian Hispanic Students with Disabilities ELL * * * * * * Economically Disadvantaged

23 DUMONT PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES DISTRICT GRADE ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet (Level 1) Partially (Level 2) Approaching (Level 3) (Level ) Exceeding (Level 5) District % >= Level State %>=Lvl All Students White Black or African American Asian Hispanic Students with Disabilities ELL Students * * * * * * Economically Disadvantaged

24 DUMONT PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES DISTRICT GRADE MATHEMATICS Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet (Level 1) Partially (Level 2) Approaching (Level 3) (Level ) Exceeding (Level 5) District Level State %>=Level All Students White Black or African American Asian Hispanic Students with Disabilities ELL Students * * * * * * Economically Disadvantaged

25 Count of Valid Test Scores DUMONT PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES DISTRICT GRADE 5 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY Not Yet (Level 1) Partially (Level 2) Approaching (Level 3) (Level ) Exceeding (Level 5) District Level All Students State %>=Level White Black or African American * * * * * * Asian Hispanic Students with Disabilities ELL Students * * * * * * Economically Disadvantaged

26 DUMONT PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES DISTRICT GRADE 5 MATHEMATICS Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet (Level 1) Partially (Level 2) Approaching (Level 3) (Level ) Exceeding (Level 5) District Level State %>=Level All Students White Black or African American * * * * * *. 26 Asian Hispanic Students with Disabilities ELL Students * * * * * * Economically Disadvantaged

27 DUMONT PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES DISTRICT GRADE 6 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet (Level 1) Partially (Level 2) Approaching (Level 3) (Level ) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level State %>=Level All Students White Black or African American * * * * * * Asian Hispanic Students with Disabilities ELL Students * * * * * * Economically Disadvantaged

28 DUMONT PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES DISTRICT GRADE 6 MATHEMATICS Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet (Level 1) Partially (Level 2) Approaching (Level 3) (Level ) Exceeding (Level 5) District Level State %>=Lev el All Students White Black or African American * * * * * * Asian Hispanic Students with Disabilities ELL Students * * * * * * 0 21 Economically Disadvantaged

29 DUMONT PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES DISTRICT GRADE 7 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet (Level 1) Partially (Level 2) Approaching (Level 3) (Level ) Exceeding (Level 5) District Level State %>=Level All Students White Black or African American Asian Hispanic Students with Disabilities ELL Students * * * * * * Economically Disadvantaged

30 DUMONT PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES DISTRICT GRADE 7 MATHEMATICS Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet (Level 1) Partially (Level 2) Approaching (Level 3) (Level ) Exceeding (Level 5) District Level State %>=Level All Students White Black or African American Asian Hispanic Students with Disabilities ELL Students * * * * * * Economically Disadvantaged

31 DUMONT PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES DISTRICT GRADE 8 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS LITERACY Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet (Level 1) Partially (Level 2) Approaching (Level 3) (Level ) Exceeding (Level 5) District Level State %>=Level All Students White Black or African American * * * * * * Asian Hispanic Students with Disabilities ELL Students * * * * * * Economically Disadvantaged

32 DUMONT PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2018 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES DISTRICT GRADE 8 MATHEMATICS Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet (Level 1) Partially (Level 2) Approaching (Level 3) (Level ) Exceeding (Level 5) District Level State %>=Level All Students White Black or African American * * * * * * Asian Hispanic Students with Disabilities ELL Students * * * * * * Economically Disadvantaged

33 HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT RESULTS

34 DUMONT HIGH SCHOOL 2018 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES GRADE 9 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet (Level 1) Partially (Level 2) Approaching (Level 3) (Level ) Exceeding (Level 5) DHS% >= Level All Students State %>=Level White Black or African American * * * * * * Asian Hispanic Students with Disabilities ELL Students * * * * * * Economically Disadvantaged

35 DUMONT HIGH SCHOOL 2018 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES GRADE 10 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet (Level 1) Partially (Level 2) Approaching (Level 3) (Level ) Exceeding (Level 5) DHS% >= Level State %>=Level All Students White Black or African- American * * * * * * Asian Hispanic Students with Disabilities ELL Students * * * * * * 0 10 Economically Disadvantaged

36 DUMONT HIGH SCHOOL 2018 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES GRADE 11 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet (Level 1) Partially (Level 2) Approaching (Level 3) (Level ) Exceeding (Level 5) DHS Level State %>=Level All Students White Black or African- American * * * * * * Asian Hispanic Students with Disabilities ELL Students * * * * * * Economically Disadvantaged

37 DUMONT PUBLIC SCHOOLS(DHS, HONISS, SELZER) 2018 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ALGEBRA 1 Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet (Level 1) Partially (Level 2) Approaching (Level 3) (Level ) Exceeding (Level 5) Level State %>=Level All Students White Black or African- American * * * * * * Asian Hispanic Students with Disabilities ELL Students * * * * * * Economically Disadvantaged

38 DUMONT HIGH SCHOOL 2018 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES GEOMETRY Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet (Level 1) Partially (Level 2) Approaching (Level 3) (Level ) Exceeding (Level 5) DHS% >= Level State %>=Level All Students White Black or African American * * * * * * Asian Hispanic Students with Disabilities ELL Students * * * * * * Economically Disadvantaged

39 DUMONT HIGH SCHOOL 2018 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ALGEBRA II Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet (Level 1) Partially (Level 2) Approaching (Level 3) (Level ) Exceeding Expectatio ns (Level 5) DHS% >= Level State %>=Level All Students White Black or African American * * * * * * Asian Hispanic Students with Disabilities ELL Students * * * * * * Economically Disadvantaged

40 QUESTIONS TO GUIDE PARCC DATA REFLECTION & ACTION PLAN STEPS How will we use PARCC data to identify strengths and gaps that exist in our curriculum and instruction? 1. A District-Level analysis of the data has been shared with each school. An initial review of the district Level data shows that the following areas are a general focus area for improvement for all of the grade levels: * ELA- Reading-Informational Text (Science/Technical Subjects) Writing- Literary Analysis & Research Simulation * Math-Type II Reasoning Problems (Short Answer/Hand Scored Items) 2. Building Based Data Teams will now continue to analyze state standardized test data and various instructional reports by classroom and grade level to identify areas of strength and target areas of instructional focus for this year. 0

41 QUESTIONS TO GUIDE PARCC DATA REFLECTION & ACTION PLAN STEPS 3. Principals/School teams will then develop building specific goals/action plans targeting all students to demonstrate increased proficiency levels on state assessments. Building goals will specifically focus on areas in need of improvement and subgroup populations in need of improvement.. Curriculum committees and PLCs will utilize the data to continue to review and revise district curriculum in these areas and make recommendations to the district to continue to improve the overall instructional program. 5. Professional development in the areas of mathematics and language arts, will be offered to continue to improve teacher understanding of the NJSLS and state standardized testing(especially in the identified areas). 1

42 QUESTIONS TO GUIDE PARCC DATA REFLECTION & ACTION PLAN STEPS What intervention strategies will we use? 1. Provide targeted PARCC skills- based practice to all students who are identified as, or who are at risk of being not proficient on state testing through direct practice activities integrated into instructional units for all students, with a focus on instructional areas that have been identified for improvement. 2. There will be more instructional focus placed on the areas that have been identified at each grade level and/or schools. 3. The district will continue to utilize various assessment programs to continue to progress monitor students and to provide additional instructional practice on technology based assessments (Study Island, STAR Assessments, IXL). 2