School Administrator Evaluation System. Rule 6A Form AEST-2015 Effective Date: 2015

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "School Administrator Evaluation System. Rule 6A Form AEST-2015 Effective Date: 2015"

Transcription

1 School Administrator Evaluation System Rule 6A Form AEST-2015 Effective Date: 2015 Citrus Sandra Himmel, Superintendent Suzanne Swain, Coordinator of Certification and Professional Standards

2 Table of Contents 1. Performance of Students 2. Instructional Leadership 3. Other Indicators of Performance 4. Summative Evaluation Score 5. Additional Requirements 6. District Evaluation Procedures 7. District Self-Monitoring 8. Appendix A Checklist for Approval 9. Appendix B Self-Reflection Tool 10. Appendix C Observation Instrument 11. Appendix D Administrator Summative Evaluation 12. Appendix E Developing Rubric for Deliberate Practice Plan 13. Appendix F Rating Rubric for Deliberate Practice Plan 14. Appendix G Deliberate Practice Plan Template Directions: This document has been provided in Microsoft Word format for the convenience of the district. The order of the template shall not be rearranged. Each section offers specific directions, but does not limit the amount of space or information that can be added to fit the needs of the district. All submitted documents shall be titled and paginated. Where documentation or evidence is required, copies of the source document(s) (for example, rubrics, policies and procedures, observation instruments) shall be provided. Upon completion, the district shall the template and required supporting documentation for submission to the address DistrictEvalSysEQ@fldoe.org. **Modifications to an approved evaluation system may be made by the district at any time. A revised evaluation system shall be submitted for approval, in accordance with Rule 6A-5.030(3), F.A.C. The entire template shall be sent for the approval process. Citrus Page 1

3 1. Performance of Students Directions: The district shall provide: For all school administrators, the percentage of the evaluation that is based on the performance of students criterion as outlined in s (3)(a)1., F.S., along with an explanation of the scoring method, including how it is calculated and combined [Rule 6A-5.030(2)(a)1., F.A.C.]. For all school administrators, confirmation of including student performance data for at least three years, including the current year and the two years immediately preceding the current year, when available. If less than the three most recent years of data are available, those years for which data are available must be used. If more than three years of student performance data are used, specify the years that will be used [Rule 6A-5.030(2)(a)3., F.A.C.]. For school administrators, the district-determined student performance measure(s) used for personnel evaluations [Rule 6A-5.030(2)(a)7., F.A.C.]. Citrus Page 2

4 Student Performance Measures The district portion (leadership practice) will be 67% and the data portion (student performance) will be 33% of the school administrator s overall summative evaluation. All administrative personnel will include student performance data for at least three years, including the current year and the two years immediately preceding the current year, when available. If less than the three most recent years of data are available, those years for which data are available must be used. School administrators will receive a rating based on their school wide VAM results and the data collected from district designed assessments. Citrus County will accept the schoolwide VAM (1-4) that the DOE issues. The weighting of the VAM will be proportional to the teaching assignment at the school. The state provides ratings based on the cut scores. The ratings issued by the state in combination with the district data ratings will be averaged to give the administrator (s) a rating for the data portion of the evaluation system. Instructional personnel receive a rating for the district designed assessments. Again, all data ratings will be combined and averaged to provide the administrator(s) with an overall data rating. For example, an administrator has 10 teachers assigned to him. 5 teachers receive highly effective, 3 receive effective, and 2 receive needs improvement as the data rating. The ratings are given a value (1-4). The overall total score is 33 points. When divided by the number of teachers, 10, the average score is 3.3 which is an overall rating of effective. The rating matrix on page 18 clearly explains how the two ratings will be combined for the overall evaluation rating. Below is a chart of the data sources administrators will use to determine the data rating for instructional staff. STATEWIDE ASSESSMENTS USING VAM DATA CONTENT AREA/TEACHER GRADE Performance Measure(s) for Evaluation Purposes Percentage Associated with Final Summative Evaluation English Language Arts & Math 4-8 FSA ELA & Math VAM English Language Arts & Reading 4-10 FSA ELA VAM Math 4-8 FSA Math VAM Algebra FSA EOC VAM District: TOSA Math PK-12 District FSA, EOC Math VAM District: TOSA ELA, Program Specialist PK-12 District FSA ELA VAM ELA, Literacy Coach Non-Classroom Instructional Personnel PK-12 School-Wide VAM=FSA (Guidance, Media, ESE Specialist, Speech ELA and MATH, or FSA ELA, Pathologist, School TOSA, Technology Specialist, or FSA Math Testing Specialist, Athletic Director, Title I) District: TOSA (ESE, Grant Writer), ESE Specialist, Social Worker, School Psychologist, Teacher Hearing Impaired, Technology PK-12 District FSA, EOC - ELA & Math VAM 33% HE, E, D/NI, U Citrus Page 3

5 Specialists, Speech Pathologist, Lead Speech & Language Teacher CDE School-Wide VAM (all 3 high schools) STATEWIDE ASSESSMENTS USING DISTRICT ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE MODEL (NOT VAM DATA) Geometry, Algebra FSA EOC: Geometry, Algebra 2 Biology, US History, Civics 6-12 NGSSS EOC: Biology, US History, Civics Science- 8 th grade 8 Science- 5 th grade (if only teaches 5 Science) NGSSS FCAT 2.0 Science- 8 th grade NGSSS FCAT 2.0 Science- 5 th grade District: TOSA Science K-12 District NGSSS FCAT 2.0 Science and Biology EOC District: TOSA Social Studies K-12 District US History and Civics EOC Pre-Kindergarten PK VPK Assessment Advanced Placement Classes 9-12 AP Tests AP Human Geography 9 AP Tests International Baccalaureate 9-12 IB Tests Career and Technical Courses (High School) with Industry Certification 9-12 Industry Certification Exams If 50% of students are not IC tested, then End-of-Term Test will serve as the data source GED, Adult Education TOSA 9-Adult Industry Certification WTC Career & Technical Courses of Study 9-Adult Content Specific Certification Exams For instructional staff serving all students; Guidance, Media, Adult ESOL-Career Pathways, etc. School-wide Industry Certification Exams Transition Academy 9-Adult Employability Rating Scale Math, Applied Academics Resource Instructor 9-Adult Industry Certification Access Points K-12 Florida Standards Alternate Assessment (FSAA) DISTRICT DESIGNED ASSESSMENTS 33% HE, E, D/NI, U Citrus Page 4

6 Elementary Art, Music, PE Teachers 2 District Art, Music, PE Assessment Middle School- Non-State Tested subject 6-8 District End-of-Term areas and elective courses Test High School- Non-State Tested core 9-12 District End-of-Term subject areas (not linked to EOC, AP or IB Test courses): Informal Geometry Liberal Arts Mathematics 2 Pre-Calculus Honors Calculus Honors Environmental Science Earth Space Science Physical Science and Honors Marine Science and Honors Chemistry 1 and Honors Anatomy and Physiology and Honors US Government and Honors World History and Honors Economics with Financial Lit and Honors World Cultural Geography Spanish 1 English III and IV and Honors DISTRICT SELECTED ASSESSMENTS High School- Non-State Tested course and electives not listed above Kindergarten, First Grade, Second Grade, Third Grade Career and Technical Courses (not linked to Industry Certification Assessments) 9-12 Teacher Created- Principal Approved Final Exam/End-of-Term Test K-3 FastBridge areading 9-12 Teacher Created Final Exam/End-of-Term Test 33% HE, E, D/NI, U 33% HE, E, D/NI, U Citrus Page 5

7 Below are the Growth Models we use to determine the overall data ratings for instructional personnel. Citrus Page 6

8 Citrus Page 7

9 Citrus Page 8

10 2. Instructional Leadership Directions The district shall provide: For all school administrators, the percentage of the evaluation system that is based on the instructional leadership criterion as outlined in s (3)(a)3., F.S., along with an explanation of the scoring method, including how it is calculated and combined [Rule 6A-5.030(2)(c)1., F.A.C.]. Description of the district evaluation framework for school administrators and the contemporary research basis in effective educational practices [Rule 6A-5.030(2)(c)2., F.A.C.]. For all school administrators, a crosswalk from the district s evaluation framework to the Principal Leadership Standards [Rule 6A-5.030(2)(c)3., F.A.C.]. Observation or other data collection instrument(s) that include indicators, organized by domains, based on each of the Principal Leadership Standards, and additional elements provided in s (3)(a)3., F.S. [Rule 6A-5.030(2)(c)4., F.A.C.]. Procedures for observing and collecting data and other evidence of instructional leadership [Rule 6A-5.030(2)(c)5., F.A.C.]. The following optional chart is provided for your convenience to display the crosswalk of the district s evaluation framework to the Principal Leadership Standards. Other methods to display information are acceptable, as long as each standard and descriptor is addressed. Citrus Page 9

11 Instructional Leadership Scoring Method The district portion (leadership practice) will be 67% and the data portion (student performance) will be 33% of the school administrator s overall summative evaluation. The district leadership portion will include the five standards listed on pages 9-13 and the Deliberate Practice Plan. Each standard and Deliberate Practice Plan will be 17% of the 67% of the district portion (leadership practice) rating for the district portion (leadership practice). The administrator will receive a rating for each standard and a rating for the Deliberate Practice Plan. Those ratings will be added together and averaged to determine the overall score for the district portion of the summative evaluation. Once a rating is determined for the district portion (leadership practice), that rating will be combined with data portion. The chart on page 18 explains how the overall rating is determined. Observing and Collecting Data for Instructional Leadership The administrator s supervisor will collect artifacts and observe at the school site throughout the year. The supervisor of the administrator will complete school-wide walkthroughs which will allow the supervisor to collect data. Examples of data collected include, but are limited to, charts documenting student performance, walkthrough notes documenting effective classroom instruction, accomplishing strategies listed in the school improvement plan, and evidence demonstrating highly effective/effective leadership practices. Contemporary Research in Effective Educational Practices The underlying research base of this evaluation system combines many of the concepts of "reflective practices, "collaborative action, "learning communities" and "quality management into the Working on the Work" concepts of Dr. Phillip C. Schlechty and his organization, The Center for Leadership in School Reform. Our new process includes the research and principles that support the Florida Principal Leadership Standards which is the framework for the entire assessment system. The foundation of the evaluative processes is based on the research from the practices of Douglas Reeves and The Leadership and Learning Center. Other research utilized in the revision of our appraisal system includes the six (6) design standards from The New Teacher Project as well as the extensive research information provided through Robert J. Marzano and his organization Learning Sciences International. Also integrated into this evaluation system are high impact teaching strategies developed by Max Thompson and the high effect size strategies by John Hattie. School Administrator Professional Standards and Florida Principal Leadership Indicators Citrus Page 10

12 To support this end, CCS has clearly defined a set of standards-based expectations for school administrators and has established a set of processes and procedures to assist school administrators in meeting these standards. To clarify these expectations, five (5) Citrus County Standards have been developed to guide the work of school administrators. The five (5) Standards encompass Florida Principal Leadership Indicators (FPLI), which are based on essential foundational principles. The appraisal committee matched the FPLIs descriptors to the five (5) Standards. As the FPLIs provide a common language and statewide understanding of the expectations of quality instruction, the descriptors serve as indicators of effectiveness within each Citrus County Standard in our revised evaluation system Standard: 1 The school administrator supports the beliefs, shared vision, and mission adopted by the district. 1.2.A Enables faculty and staff to work as a system focused on student learning. 1.2.B Maintains a school climate that supports student engagement in learning. 1.2.C Generates high expectations for learning growth by all students. 2.5.A Maintains a safe, respectful and inclusive student-centered learning environment that is focused on equitable opportunities for learning and building a foundation for a fulfilling life in a democratic society and global economy. 2.5.B Recognizes and uses diversity as an asset in the development and implementation of procedures and practices that motivate all students and improve student learning. 2.5.C Promotes school and classroom practices that validate and value similarities and differences among students. 3.7.E Develops sustainable and supportive relationships between school leaders, parents, community, higher education and business leaders. 3.9.A Actively listens to and learns from students, staff, parents, and community stakeholders. 3.9.C Communicates student expectations and performance information to students, parents, and community A Adheres to the Code of Ethics and the Principles of Professional Conduct for the Education Profession in Florida, pursuant to Rules 6B and 6B-1.006, F.A.C B Demonstrates resiliency by staying focused on the school vision and reacting constructively to the barriers to success that include disagreement and dissent with leadership C Demonstrates a commitment to the success of all students, identifying barriers and their impact on the well-being of the school, families, and local community. Citrus Page 11

13 Standard: 2 The school administrator designs and delivers knowledge work that meets the needs of staff, students, parents, school system, and community. 1.1.A Develops the school's learning goals based on the states adopted student academic standards and the districts adopted curricula. 2.3.A Implements the Florida Educator Accomplished Practices as described in Rule 6A-5.065, F.A.C. through a common language of instruction. 2.3.D Implements the district's adopted curricula and state's adopted academic standards in a manner that is rigorous and culturally relevant to the students and school. 2.4.A Generates a focus on student and professional learning in the school that is clearly linked to the system-wide strategic objectives and the school improvement plan. 2.4.E Implements professional learning that enables faculty to deliver culturally relevant and differentiated instruction. 2.5.F Engages faculty in recognizing and understanding cultural and developmental issues related to student learning by identifying and addressing strategies to minimize and/or eliminate achievement gaps. Standard: 3 The school administrator manages the resources of time, people, space, information and technology in order to enhance the qualities of the work provided to the staff and students. 2.4.C Employs a faculty with the instructional proficiencies needed for the school population served. 2.4.D Identifies faculty instructional proficiency needs, including standards-based content, research-based pedagogy, data analysis for instructional planning and improvement, and the use of instructional technology. 2.4.F Provides resources and time and engages faculty in effective individual and collaborative professional learning throughout the school year. 3.6.E Uses effective technology integration to enhance decision making and efficiency throughout the school. 3.8.A Organizes time, tasks and projects effectively with clear objectives and coherent plans. Citrus Page 12

14 3.8.B Establishes appropriate deadlines for him/herself and the entire organization. 3.8.C Manages schedules, delegates, and allocates resources to promote collegial efforts in school improvement and faculty development. 3.8.D Is fiscally responsible and maximizes the impact of fiscal resources on instructional priorities. 3.9.E Creates opportunities within the school to engage students, faculty, parents, and community stakeholders in constructive conversations about important school issues. 3.9.F Utilizes appropriate technologies for communication and collaboration. 3.9.G Ensures faculty receives timely information about student learning requirements, academic standards, and all other local state and federal administrative requirements and decisions. Standard: 4 The school administrator continuously monitors and communicates the extent to which staff and students are engaging the work, persisting with the work, experiencing satisfaction in the products of the work, and modifies the work accordingly. 1.1.B Analyzes student learning results which are evidenced by the student performance and growth on statewide assessments; district-determined assessments that are implemented by the district under Section , F.S.; international assessments; and other indicators of student success adopted by the district and state. 1.2.D Engages faculty and staff in efforts to close learning performance gaps among student subgroups within the school. 2.3.B Engages in data analysis for instructional planning and improvement. 2.3.C Communicates the relationships among academic standards, effective instruction, and student performance. 2.3.E Ensures the appropriate use of high quality formative and interim assessments aligned with the adopted standards and curricula. 2.4.B Evaluates, monitors, and provides timely feedback to faculty on the effectiveness of instruction. 2.5.D Provides recurring monitoring and feedback on the quality of the learning environment. 2.5.E Initiates and supports continuous improvement processes focused on the students' opportunities for success and well-being. Citrus Page 13

15 4.10.F Demonstrates explicit improvement in specific performance areas based on previous evaluations and formative feedback. Standard: 5 The school administrator is a leader. 3.6.A Gives priority attention to decisions that impact the quality of student learning and teacher proficiency. 3.6.B Uses critical thinking and problem solving techniques to define problems and identify solutions. 3.6.C Evaluates decisions for effectiveness, equity, intended and actual outcome; implements follow-up actions; and revises as needed. 3.6.D Empowers others and distributes leadership when appropriate. 3.7.A Identifies and cultivates potential and emerging leaders. 3.7.B Provides evidence of delegation and trust in subordinate leaders. 3.7.C Plans for succession management in key positions. 3.7.D Promotes teacher leadership functions focused on instructional proficiency and student learning. 3.9.B Recognizes individuals for effective performance. 3.9.D Maintains high visibility at school and in the community and regularly engages stakeholders in the work of the school D Engages in professional learning that improves professional practice in alignment with the needs of the school system E Demonstrates willingness to admit error and learn from it. Observation Form The observation form (Appendix C) will be used by the supervisor to show proficiency levels for all administrators. The observation instrument was developed by integrating the FPLS indicators into the five Citrus County standards. Proficiency levels on the observation instrument will follow the guidelines established by Florida Statute with feedback provided by the Citrus Page 14

16 supervisor conducting the formal or informal observation. This evaluation process, including feedback, begins with an initial conference with the administrator, on-going informal observations, formal and informal feedback, and concludes with a summative evaluation infusing data outcomes with principal competencies. Directions: The district shall provide: 3. Other Indicators of Performance The additional performance indicators, if the district chooses to include such additional indicators pursuant to s (3)(a)4., F.S.; The percentage of the final evaluation that is based upon the additional indicators; and The scoring method, including how it is calculated and combined [Rule 6A-5.030(2)(d), F.A.C.]. Examples include the following: Deliberate Practice - the selection of indicators or practices, improvement on which is measured during an evaluation period Peer Reviews Objectively reliable survey information from students and parents based on teaching practices that are consistently associated with higher student achievement Individual Professional Leadership Plan Other indicators, as selected by the district Citrus Page 15

17 Deliberate Practice Plan School administrators are required to complete a Deliberate Practice Plan (Appendix G) every year. School administrators will use the Developing Rubric (Appendix E) when writing the Deliberate Practice Plan. School administrators will implement the Deliberate Practice Plan throughout the school year. A rating of HE, E, D, NI, U will be given based on successful implementation of the plan. The Rating Rubric (Appendix F) will be used by the administrator to determine the rating. The rating will be under the Professional Standards and Florida Principal Leadership Indicators. The Deliberate Practice Plan will be 17% of the rating for the district portion of the evaluation system. The district portion will be combined with the data portion which will determine the overall evaluation rating. Citrus Page 16

18 4. Summative Evaluation Score Directions: The district shall provide: The summative evaluation form(s); and The scoring method, including how it is calculated and combined; and The performance standards used to determine the summative evaluation rating. Districts shall use the four performance levels provided in s (2)(e), F.S., [Rule 6A-5.030(2)(e), F.A.C.]. Citrus Page 17

19 Summative Evaluation Each administrator will receive a rating of Highly Effective, Effective, Needs Improvement, or Unsatisfactory based on his/her performance on the district portion of the administrator summative evaluation (Appendix D). School administrators will receive a rating for the data portion based on school-wide VAM. The district portion of the summative evaluation will be 67% of the overall evaluation. The data portion of the evaluation will be 33% of the overall evaluation. The rating matrix in this section will be used to determine the overall rating. The assistant superintendent and principals will schedule an end of the year meeting with each administrator to complete a summative evaluation. During this meeting, administrators will share data related to his/her student performance data/achievement documented in his/her professional development plan/deliberate practice, discuss the strategies implemented throughout the year, and participate in conversation about performance related to the five (5) Citrus County Standards based on the Self-Reflection Tool. After reviewing the evidences of effectiveness gathered throughout the year via informal/formal walkthroughs and classroom observations, the administrator s supervisor will assign a rating of Highly Effective, Effective, Needs Improvement, or Unsatisfactory for the six components of the district portion of the evaluation system. Each component is weighted as 17% of the 67% of the district portion. Once the rating for the district portion is determined by combining the six components, that rating is weighted at 67% of the final evaluation rating. The rating for the student performance portion of the evaluation will be based on the growth model rating provided by the state or the district model for teachers of subjects and grades not assessed by statewide assessments. School administrators will receive a rating based on their school wide VAM results and the data collected from district designed assessments. Citrus County will accept the schoolwide VAM (1-4) that the DOE issues. The weighting of the VAM will be proportional to the teaching assignment at the school. The state provides ratings based on the cut scores. The ratings issued by the state in combination with the district data ratings will be averaged to give the administrator (s) a rating for the data portion of the evaluation system. Instructional personnel receive a rating for the district designed assessments. Again, all data ratings will be combined and averaged to provide the administrator(s) with an overall data rating. For example, an administrator has 10 teachers assigned to him. 5 teachers receive highly effective, 3 receive effective, and 2 receive needs improvement as the data rating. The ratings are given a value (1-4). The overall total score is 33 points. When divided by the number of teachers, 10, the average score is 3.3 which is an overall rating of effective. The rating matrix on page 18 clearly explains how the two ratings will be combined for the overall evaluation rating. Summative Evaluation Ratings Highly Effective Performance and results relative to CCS and the Accomplished Practices are consistently at the highly effective level. Citrus Page 18

20 CCS and the Accomplished Practices should exceed effective levels and constitute models of proficiency for other teachers. This level of CCS and the Accomplished Practices reflect extraordinary effort and superior capabilities. Effective Performance and results relative to CCS and the Accomplished Practices are consistently effective. The level of CCS and the Accomplished Practices reflect efforts and capabilities that consistently meet expectations. Developing (instructional personnel in the first 3 years of employment) Needs Improvement (4+ years) Performance and results relative to CCS and the Accomplished Practices are developing or need improvement Efforts and capabilities show growth towards meeting CCS and the Accomplished Practices. Continued support will be provided. Unsatisfactory * Performance and results relative to CCS and the Accomplished Practices do not meet expected level of performance expectations. Efforts and capabilities do not meet the level of performance required by the CCS and the Accomplished Practices. Substantial assistance, monitoring, and training is required. *An assistance plan is required if rated as Unsatisfactory. Rating Matrix Rating Areas Florida Principal Leadership Standards 67% Student Data 33% Range Average Overall Rating Options H H Highly Effective H E Highly Effective, Effective H D/NI Highly Effective, Effective H U Effective, Developing/Needs Improvement E H Highly Effective, Effective E E Effective Citrus Page 19

21 E D/NI Effective, Developing/Needs Improvement E U Effective, Developing/Needs Improvement D/NI H Effective, Developing/Needs Improvement D/NI E Effective, Developing/Needs Improvement D/NI D/NI Developing/Needs Improvement D/NI U Developing/Needs Improvement, Unsatisfactory U H Developing/Needs Improvement U E Developing/Needs Improvement U D/NI Developing/Needs Improvement, Unsatisfactory U U Unsatisfactory Citrus Page 20

22 5. Additional Requirements Directions: The district shall provide: Documentation that the evaluator is the individual who is responsible for supervising the employee. An evaluator may consider input from other personnel trained in evaluation practices. If input is provided by other personnel, identify the additional positions or persons. Examples include assistant principals, peers, district staff, department heads, grade level chairpersons, or team leaders [Rule 6A-5.030(2)(f)2., F.A.C.]. Description of training programs and processes to ensure that all employees subject to an evaluation system are informed on evaluation criteria, data sources, methodologies, and procedures associated with the evaluation before the evaluation takes place, and that all individuals with evaluation responsibilities and those who provide input toward evaluation understand the proper use of the evaluation criteria and procedures [Rule 6A-5.030(2)(f)3., F.A.C.]. Description of the processes for providing timely feedback to the individual being evaluated [Rule 6A-5.030(2)(f)4., F.A.C.]. Description of how results from the evaluation system will be used for professional development [Rule 6A-5.030(2)(f)5., F.A.C.]. Confirmation that the district will require participation in specific professional development programs by those who have been evaluated as less than effective as required by s (10), F.S. [Rule 6A-5.030(2)(f)6., F.A.C.]. Documentation that all school administrators must be evaluated at least once a year [Rule 6A-5.030(2)(f)7., F.A.C.]. Documentation that the evaluation system for school administrators includes opportunities for parents to provide input into performance evaluations when the district determines such input is appropriate, and a description of the criteria for inclusion, and the manner of inclusion of parental input [Rule 6A-5.030(2)(f)9., F.A.C.]. Description of the district s peer assistance process, if any, for school administrators. Peer assistance may be part of the regular evaluation system, or used to assist personnel who are placed on performance probation, or who request assistance [Rule 6A-5.030(2)(f)11., F.A.C.]. If included by a district, a description of the opportunity for instructional personnel to provide input into a school administrator s performance evaluation [Rule 6A (2)(f)12., F.A.C.]. Citrus Page 21

23 Personnel Completing Evaluations The Assistant Superintendent for School Operations will complete the evaluations for all Principals and the Principals for each school site will complete the evaluations of his/her Assistant Principals. These evaluations will be completed utilizing the Citrus County Administrator Summative Assessment. Training Programs and Processes All Principals and the Assistant Superintendent for School Operations who supervise administrative personnel participate in an administrator evaluation overview meeting in July each year. A PowerPoint presentation with voiceover was created to explain the essential components of the system and is shared with the above mentioned staff, assuring that all participants heard and saw the same information. An additional training takes place in the summer of each of the following years with all administrators to clarify the processes and procedures for conducting evaluations. School based administrators who are responsible for conducting evaluations will collaborate with each other during district administrator meetings to ensure inter-rated reliability of the system. After the initial training period, subsequent training sessions will be provided for new personnel who move into evaluator roles. Annual Evaluation (Timely Feedback) All school administrators will be evaluated at least once per year. School principals will be evaluated by the Assistant Superintendent. Assistant Principals will be evaluated by the school s Principal. Annual evaluations will take place at the end of the school year for all school administrators. School administrators and the Assistant Superintendent will schedule an end of the year meeting with the administrators that they oversee to complete a summative evaluation. During this meeting, school administrators will share data related to student performance /achievement documented in his/her deliberate practice plan, discuss the strategies implemented throughout the year, reflect on the impact of professional development, and participate in conversation about performance related to the five (5) Citrus County Standards and the Florida Principal Leadership Standards based on the Self-Reflection Tool. After reviewing evidence of effectiveness gathered throughout the year via midyear review and data, the administrator will assign a rating of highly effective, effective, developing/needs improvement, or unsatisfactory for the district portion of the evaluation system. The rating for the student performance portion of the evaluation will be based on the VAM scores provided by the state. If statewide assessment data is not available prior to the end of the year, the administrator will receive a rating on the district portion. Subsequently, the summative evaluation rating will be assigned the following school year during the beginning of the year conference with the administrator. In discussing the Citrus Page 22

24 previous year s data at the beginning of the year meeting, a true cyclical improvement process will evolve. Administrators will submit the Summative Evaluation Form to the Human Resources Department Professional Development Evaluation results and data are currently used in the reflective cycle of establishing Deliberate Practice Plans. The Deliberate Practice Plan is 17% of the district portion of the evaluation system. Each educator will use their individual results to identify professional development needs which must be implemented to increase student achievement. The school administration through the school improvement process will identify professional development needs via school based data relative to teacher performance and student growth measures. The district will provide professional development activities based upon the culmination of the global results received in regards to student growth measures and teacher evaluation results. Data collected by Research and Accountability and individual schools will assist each level in determining the types of professional development options that are needed throughout the district. This process will continue in the coming years with a more systematic and defined examination of the researchedbased strategies being utilized in our schools. If an administrator receives a less than effective rating, he/she will be placed on an assistance plan and assigned a mentor administrator to provide assistance with his/her professional growth. The administrator s supervisor will provide and monitor professional development opportunities through the assistance plan. Specific professional development is required for administrators that received a rating of less than effective on their evaluations. Parent Input Parental input will be provided via yearly school improvement surveys and through School Advisory Enhancement Council meetings. Parental input into an administrator s performance evaluation will be sought if/when a school receives a grade of D or F by the Department of Education and is deemed to be in an Intervene Status according to the No Child Left Behind legislation. Citrus Page 23

25 6. District Evaluation Procedures Directions: The district shall provide evidence that its evaluation policies and procedures comply with the following statutory requirements: In accordance with s (3)(c), F.S., the evaluator must: submit a written report of the evaluation to the district school superintendent for the purpose of reviewing the employee s contract [Rule 6A-5.030(2)(g)1., F.A.C.]. submit the written report to the employee no later than 10 days after the evaluation takes place [Rule 6A-5.030(2)(g)2., F.A.C.]. discuss the written evaluation report with the employee [Rule 6A (2)(g)3.,F.A.C.]. The employee shall have the right to initiate a written response to the evaluation and the response shall become a permanent attachment to his or her personnel file [Rule 6A-5.030(2)(g)4., F.A.C.]. Documentation the district has complied with the requirement that the district school superintendent shall annually notify the Department of any school administrators who receive two consecutive unsatisfactory evaluations and shall notify the Department of any school administrators who are given written notice by the district of intent to terminate or not renew their employment, as outlined in s (5), F.S. [Rule 6A (2)(i), F.A.C.]. Citrus Page 24

26 Citrus Page 25

27 Summative Evaluation Meeting The supervisor of the administrator will schedule a time to meet with the administrator to review all of the data collected that was used to determine the final rating. The ratings for each of the five standards as well as the Deliberate Practice Plan will be shared. The supervisor will explain how each rating was determined based on data that the supervisor collected as well as artifacts that the administrator provided. Unsatisfactory Summative Evaluations Schools and cost centers will submit all administrative evaluations to the Human Resources Department once the overall rating is assigned. The superintendent will review all of the data collected regarding administrative evaluations. The superintendent will receive copies of evaluations for administrative personnel that receive an overall rating of unsatisfactory for the purpose of reviewing the employee s contract. A written report will be provided to the employee no later than 10 days after the superintendent reviews the evaluation. The employee may provide a written response to the evaluation and it shall become a permanent attachment to the personnel file. If an employee receives two consecutive unsatisfactory evaluations the superintendent will notify, in writing, the Department of Education stating district s intent to terminate or non-renew the employment. Citrus Page 26

28 7. District Self-Monitoring Directions: The district shall provide a description of its process for annually monitoring its evaluation system. The district monitoring shall determine, at a minimum, the following: Evaluators understanding of the proper use of evaluation criteria and procedures, including evaluator accuracy and inter-rater reliability; [Rule 6A-5.030(2)(j)1., F.A.C.] Evaluators provide necessary and timely feedback to employees being evaluated; [Rule 6A-5.030(2)(j)2., F.A.C.] Evaluators follow district policies and procedures in the implementation of evaluation system(s); [Rule 6A-5.030(2)(j)3., F.A.C.] Use of evaluation data to identify individual professional development; and [Rule 6A (2)(j)4., F.A.C.] Use of evaluation data to inform school and district improvement plans [Rule 6A (2)(j)5., F.A.C.]. Citrus Page 27

29 Monitoring Citrus County Schools will follow Deming s Plan-Do-Check-Act Model as the process for evaluating the effectiveness of the revised administrative evaluation system. Summative student performance data and comparative teacher/administrator evaluation ratings will be reviewed and analyzed for consistency. Revisions to the components and/or processes related to the evaluation system will be made to ensure continued improvements in instruction and student learning. In addition, we will continue to study the results of the researched-based instructional practices being utilized in our schools and provide professional development resources to support full implementation of those practices strongly linked to increased student achievement. Supervisors will complete a midyear review for all administrators in January of each school year. The rating for the district portion of the evaluation system will be completed by June of each year and the rating for the data portion of the evaluation system will be completed by October of each year. The overall evaluation for the previous year will be completed by October. School and District Improvement Plans After examining the results of school-based evaluations based on specific student growth and achievement data and reviewing the use of instructional strategies that have a high probability of increasing student achievement, school improvement plans will be developed based on identified areas. The results of evaluations will assist in defining plausible causal information relating to deficit areas. Professional development will be linked to address these needs. Similarly, district improvement plans will be able to follow the same process as the schools. The district will Citrus Page 28

30 identify global areas of need and the district improvement plan will be designed to provide resources and support to address deficit areas. Appendix A Checklist for Approval Performance of Students The district has provided and meets the following criteria: For all school administrators: The percentage of the evaluation that is based on the performance of students criterion. An explanation of the scoring method, including how it is calculated and combined. At least one-third of the evaluation is based on performance of students. For all school administrators confirmed the inclusion of student performance: Data for at least three years, including the current year and the two years immediately preceding the current year, when available. If less than the three most recent years of data are available, those years for which data are available must be used. If more than three years of student performance data are used, specified the years that will be used. For all school administrators: The district-determined student performance measure(s) used for personnel evaluations. Instructional Leadership The district has provided and meets the following criteria: For all school administrators: The percentage of the evaluation system that is based on the instructional leadership criterion. At least one-third of the evaluation is based on instructional leadership. An explanation of the scoring method, including how it is calculated and combined. The district evaluation framework for school administrators is based on contemporary research in effective educational practices. For all school administrators: A crosswalk from the district's evaluation framework to the Principal Citrus Page 29

31 Leadership Standards demonstrating that the district s evaluation contains indicators based upon each of the Principal Leadership Standards. For all school administrators: Procedures for conducting observations and collecting data and other evidence of instructional leadership. Other Indicators of Performance The district has provided and meets the following criteria: Described the additional performance indicators, if any. The percentage of the final evaluation that is based upon the additional indicators. The scoring method, including how it is calculated and combined. Summative Evaluation Score The district has provided and meets the following criteria: Summative evaluation form(s). Scoring method, including how it is calculated and combined. The performance standards used to determine the summative evaluation rating (the four performance levels: highly effective, effective, needs improvement/developing, unsatisfactory). Additional Requirements The district has provided and meets the following criteria: Documented that the evaluator is the individual who is responsible for supervising the employee. Identified additional positions or persons who provide input toward the evaluation, if any. Description of training programs: Processes to ensure that all employees subject to an evaluation system are informed on evaluation criteria, data sources, methodologies, and procedures associated with the evaluation before the evaluation takes place. Processes to ensure that all individuals with evaluation responsibilities and those who provide input toward evaluation understand the proper use of the evaluation criteria and procedures. Documented: Processes for providing timely feedback to the individual being evaluated. Description of how results from the evaluation system will be used for professional development. Requirement for participation in specific professional development programs Citrus Page 30

32 by those who have been evaluated as less than effective. All school administrators must be evaluated at least once a year. For school administrators: Inclusion of opportunities for parents to provide input into performance evaluations when the district determines such input is appropriate. Description of the district s criteria for inclusion of parental input. Description of manner of inclusion of parental input. Description of the district s peer assistance process, if any. Description of an opportunity for instructional personnel to provide input into a school administrator s evaluation, if any. District Evaluation Procedures The district has provided and meets the following criteria: That it s evaluation procedures comply with s (3)(c), F.S., including: That the evaluator must submit a written report of the evaluation to the district school superintendent for the purpose of reviewing the employee s contract. That the evaluator must submit the written report to the employee no later than 10 days after the evaluation takes place. That the evaluator must discuss the written evaluation report with the employee. That the employee shall have the right to initiate a written response to the evaluation and the response shall become a permanent attachment to his or her personnel file. That district evaluation procedures require the district school superintendent to annually notify the Department of any school administrators who receive two consecutive unsatisfactory evaluations and to notify the Department of any school administrators who are given written notice by the district of intent to terminate or not renew their employment, as outlined in s , F.S. District Self-Monitoring The district self-monitoring includes processes to determine the following: Evaluators understanding of the proper use of evaluation criteria and procedures, including evaluator accuracy and inter-rater reliability. Evaluators provide necessary and timely feedback to employees being evaluated. Evaluators follow district policies and procedures in evaluation system(s). The use of evaluation data to identify individual professional development. The use of evaluation data to inform school and district improvement plans. Citrus Page 31

33 Appendix B Self-Reflection Tool Citrus Page 32

34 Citrus Page 33

35 Citrus Page 34

36 Citrus Page 35

37 Citrus Page 36

38 Citrus Page 37

39 Citrus Page 38

40 Citrus Page 39

41 Citrus Page 40

42 Citrus Page 41

43 Citrus Page 42

44 Citrus Page 43

45 Citrus Page 44

46 Citrus Page 45

47 Citrus Page 46

48 Citrus Page 47

49 Citrus Page 48

50 Citrus Page 49

51 Citrus Page 50

52 Citrus Page 51

53 Citrus Page 52

54 Citrus Page 53

55 Citrus Page 54

56 Citrus Page 55

57 Citrus Page 56

58 Citrus Page 57

59 Citrus Page 58

60 Appendix C Observation Instrument Citrus Page 59

61 Appendix D Administrator Summative Evaluation Citrus Page 60

62 Appendix E Developing Rubric for Deliberate Practice Plan Citrus Page 61

63 Appendix F Rating Rubric for Deliberate Practice Plan Citrus Page 62

64 Appendix G Deliberate Practice Plan Template Citrus Page 63

65 State Board of Education Marva Johnson, Chair John R. Padget, Vice Chair Members Gary Chartrand Tom Grady Rebecca Fishman Lipsey <Start Michael Olenick Text Here> Andy Tuck Pam Stewart Commissioner of Education August 11, 2016 Sandra C. Himmel, Superintendent Citrus County Schools 1007 West Main Street Inverness, Florida Dear Superintendent Himmel: Thank you for submitting amendments to your district s School Administrator Evaluation System. Your amendments to the Citrus County Schools evaluation system for school administrators have been approved for The department appreciates your continued leadership in your district and throughout the state for the benefit of all of our students. At your earliest convenience, please ensure that district staff update your district s website with the revised School Administrator Evaluation System that was approved by the department and send the URL link to DistrictEvalSysEQ@fldoe.org. For questions or concerns, please contact Eileen McDaniel Eileen.McDaniel@fldoe.org ( ) or Jason Graham Jason.Graham@fldoe.org ( ). Sincerely, Eileen L. McDaniel ELM/jgd cc: Suzanne Swain, Director of Human Resources Eileen L. McDaniel Bureau Chief, Educator Recruitment, Development & Retention W. Gaines Street Tallahassee, FL , Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved.

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators DPAS-II Guide (Revised) for Teachers Updated August 2017 Table of Contents I. Introduction to DPAS II Purpose of

More information

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators DPAS-II Guide for Administrators (Assistant Principals) Guide for Evaluating Assistant Principals Revised August

More information

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP) Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association 2015-2017 Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP) Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association 2015-2017 Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP) TABLE

More information

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs) Standard 1 STANDARD 1: DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A SHARED VISION Education leaders facilitate the development and implementation of a shared vision of learning and growth of all students. Element

More information

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties 158.842 Definitions for KRS 158.840 to 158.844 -- Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties of committee -- Report to Interim Joint Committee on

More information

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION Connecticut State Department of Education October 2017 Preface Connecticut s educators are committed to ensuring that students develop the skills and acquire

More information

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4) Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4) Evidence Used in Evaluation Rubric (5) Evaluation Cycle: Training (6) Evaluation Cycle: Annual Orientation (7) Evaluation Cycle:

More information

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal ISS Administrative Searches is pleased to announce Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal Seeks Elementary Principal Application Deadline: October 30, 2017 Visit the ISS Administrative Searches webpage to view

More information

District English Language Learners (ELL) Plan

District English Language Learners (ELL) Plan 2016-2019 District English Language Learners (ELL) Plan Contact Person: Ms. Sheila Labissiere LEA: _FAMU Developmental Research School_ Email: Sheila.Labissiere@famu.edu Phone: 850-412-5821 or 850-412-5930

More information

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools The district requests an additional year to implement the previously approved turnaround option. Evidence

More information

State Parental Involvement Plan

State Parental Involvement Plan A Toolkit for Title I Parental Involvement Section 3 Tools Page 41 Tool 3.1: State Parental Involvement Plan Description This tool serves as an example of one SEA s plan for supporting LEAs and schools

More information

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION Arizona Department of Education Tom Horne, Superintendent of Public Instruction STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 5 REVISED EDITION Arizona Department of Education School Effectiveness Division

More information

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual Policy Identification Priority: Twenty-first Century Professionals Category: Qualifications and Evaluations Policy ID Number: TCP-C-006 Policy Title:

More information

Educational Quality Assurance Standards. Residential Juvenile Justice Commitment Programs DRAFT

Educational Quality Assurance Standards. Residential Juvenile Justice Commitment Programs DRAFT Educational Quality Assurance Standards Residential Juvenile Justice Commitment Programs 2009 2010 Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services Division of K-12 Public Schools Florida Department

More information

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers Definition and Responsibilities 1. What is home education? Frequently Asked Questions and Answers Section 1002.01, F.S., defines home education as the sequentially progressive instruction of a student

More information

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview 1 Eligible Credit Flexibility Plans 2 Earned Credit from Credit Flexibility Plans 2 Student Athletes 3 Application Process 3 Final

More information

Institutional Program Evaluation Plan Training

Institutional Program Evaluation Plan Training Institutional Program Evaluation Plan Training Office of Educator Preparation March 2015 Section 1004.04, Florida Statutes, Each state-approved teacher preparation program must annually report A list of

More information

Port Jefferson Union Free School District. Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN

Port Jefferson Union Free School District. Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN Port Jefferson Union Free School District Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN 2016-2017 Approved by the Board of Education on August 16, 2016 TABLE of CONTENTS

More information

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning ICPBL Certification mission is to PBL Certification Process ICPBL Processing Center c/o CELL 1400 East Hanna Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46227 (317) 791-5702

More information

Exceptional Student Education Monitoring and Assistance On-Site Visit Report. Sarasota County School District April 25-27, 2016

Exceptional Student Education Monitoring and Assistance On-Site Visit Report. Sarasota County School District April 25-27, 2016 2015-16 Exceptional Student Education Monitoring and Assistance On-Site Visit Report Sarasota County School District April 25-27, 2016 This publication is produced through the Bureau of Exceptional Education

More information

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION A Publication of the Accrediting Commission For Community and Junior Colleges Western Association of Schools and Colleges For use in

More information

Practice Learning Handbook

Practice Learning Handbook Southwest Regional Partnership 2 Step Up to Social Work University of the West of England Holistic Assessment of Practice Learning in Social Work Practice Learning Handbook Post Graduate Diploma in Social

More information

CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS

CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS No. 18 (replaces IB 2008-21) April 2012 In 2008, the State Education Department (SED) issued a guidance document to the field regarding the

More information

Program Elements Definitions and Structure

Program Elements Definitions and Structure Program Elements Definitions and Structure Types of Programs MATC offers numerous courses, programs, and training opportunities designed to meet the needs of the Milwaukee area community. There are currently

More information

Florida s Common Language of Instruction

Florida s Common Language of Instruction Florida s Common Language of Instruction DOE Form No. EQEVAL-2012-4 Florida is in the midst of a historically significant paradigm shift in how public education works. A statewide systemic change process

More information

MIDDLE SCHOOL. Academic Success through Prevention, Intervention, Remediation, and Enrichment Plan (ASPIRE)

MIDDLE SCHOOL. Academic Success through Prevention, Intervention, Remediation, and Enrichment Plan (ASPIRE) MIDDLE SCHOOL Academic Success through Prevention, Intervention, Remediation, and Enrichment Plan (ASPIRE) Board Approved July 28, 2010 Manual and Guidelines ASPIRE MISSION The mission of the ASPIRE program

More information

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE PROCESS FOR RANKED FACULTY 2-0902 ACADEMIC AFFAIRS September 2015 PURPOSE The purpose of this policy and procedures letter

More information

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM (Revised 11/2014) 1 Fern Ridge Schools Specialist Performance Review and Evaluation System TABLE OF CONTENTS Timeline of Teacher Evaluation and Observations

More information

Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts. Reference Guide April 2016

Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts. Reference Guide April 2016 Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts Reference Guide April 2016 Massachusetts Department of Higher Education One Ashburton

More information

Practice Learning Handbook

Practice Learning Handbook Southwest Regional Partnership 2 Step Up to Social Work University of the West of England Holistic Assessment of Practice Learning in Social Work Practice Learning Handbook Post Graduate Diploma in Social

More information

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL PART 25 CERTIFICATION

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL PART 25 CERTIFICATION ISBE 23 ILLINOIS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 25 TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES : EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION : PERSONNEL Section 25.10 Accredited Institution PART 25 CERTIFICATION

More information

FTE General Instructions

FTE General Instructions Florida Department of Education Bureau of PK-20 Education Data Warehouse and Office of Funding and Financial Reporting FTE General Instructions 2017-18 Questions and comments regarding this publication

More information

School Leadership Rubrics

School Leadership Rubrics School Leadership Rubrics The School Leadership Rubrics define a range of observable leadership and instructional practices that characterize more and less effective schools. These rubrics provide a metric

More information

CÉGEP HERITAGE COLLEGE POLICY #15

CÉGEP HERITAGE COLLEGE POLICY #15 www.cegep-heritage.qc.ca CÉGEP HERITAGE COLLEGE POLICY #15 CONCERNING FACULTY EVALUATION COMING INTO FORCE: September 27, 2011 REVISED: ADMINISTRATOR: Academic Dean and Director of Human Resources 325,

More information

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic Academic Intervention Services Plan Revised September 2016 October 2015 Newburgh Enlarged City School District Elementary Academic Intervention Services

More information

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document New Jersey Department of Education 2018-2020 World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document Please use this guidance document to help you prepare for your district s application submission

More information

The Sarasota County Pre International Baccalaureate International Baccalaureate Programs at Riverview High School

The Sarasota County Pre International Baccalaureate International Baccalaureate Programs at Riverview High School 2016/2017 The Sarasota County Pre International Baccalaureate International Baccalaureate Programs at Riverview High School See Page 8 for explanation APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION 2016/2017 1 Ram Way Sarasota,

More information

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL) UPDATE FOR SUNSHINE STATE TESOL 2013

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL) UPDATE FOR SUNSHINE STATE TESOL 2013 ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL) UPDATE FOR SUNSHINE STATE TESOL 2013 Presented by: Chane Eplin, Bureau Chief Student Achievement through Language Acquisition Florida Department of Education May 16, 2013

More information

DISTRICT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION & REPORTING GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES

DISTRICT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION & REPORTING GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 20 (KOOTENAY-COLUMBIA) DISTRICT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION & REPORTING GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES The purpose of the District Assessment, Evaluation & Reporting Guidelines and Procedures

More information

Brandon Alternative School

Brandon Alternative School Hillborough County Public Schools 2016-17 School Improvement Plan Hillsborough - 4332 - - 2016-17 SIP 1019 N PARSONS RD, Seffner, FL 33584 [ no web address on file ] School Demographics School Type and

More information

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for 2015-16 Online UIP Report Organization Code: 2690 District Name: PUEBLO CITY 60 Official 2014 SPF: 1-Year Executive Summary How are students performing?

More information

FLORIDA. -Mindingall. Portilla Dr. Wilbert. endent of School. Superinte. Associate Curriculum. Assistant

FLORIDA. -Mindingall. Portilla Dr. Wilbert. endent of School. Superinte. Associate Curriculum. Assistant Miami-Dade County Public Schools Curriculum Bulletin 2012-2013 THE SCHOOL BOARD OF MIAMI-D DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA Ms. Perla Tabares Hantman, Chair Dr. Lawrence S. Feldman, Vice Chair Dr. Dorothy Bendross-

More information

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015 Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State May 2015 The Law - Education Law Section 211-f and Receivership In April 2015, Subpart E of Part EE of Chapter 56 of the Laws of 2015

More information

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS A $10.00 fee will be assessed for all computer education classes.

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS A $10.00 fee will be assessed for all computer education classes. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE A $10.00 fee will be assessed for all computer education classes. CODE CO-REQUISITE NOTES H02 820902001 Computing for College and Careers 09-12 Student Interest H40 881211001

More information

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted. PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT FACULTY DEVELOPMENT and EVALUATION MANUAL Approved by Philosophy Department April 14, 2011 Approved by the Office of the Provost June 30, 2011 The Department of Philosophy Faculty

More information

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION Focus on Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL ACCREDITING COMMISSION FOR SCHOOLS, WESTERN ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES www.acswasc.org 10/10/12 2013 WASC EDITION Focus on Learning THE ACCREDITATION

More information

Brockton Public Schools. Professional Development Plan Teacher s Guide

Brockton Public Schools. Professional Development Plan Teacher s Guide Brockton Public Schools Professional Development Plan Teacher s Guide Matthew H. Malone, PH.D. Superintendent of Schools Brockton, Massachusetts City of Brockton BROCKTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS Matthew H. Malone,

More information

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA Georgia Teacher Academy for Preparation and Pedagogy Pathways to Certification West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA 20220 770-583-2528 www.westgaresa.org 1 Georgia s Teacher Academy Preparation

More information

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program Together we Shape the Future through Excellence in Teaching, Scholarship, and Leadership College of Education

More information

What does Quality Look Like?

What does Quality Look Like? What does Quality Look Like? Directions: Review the new teacher evaluation standards on the left side of the table and brainstorm ideas with your team about what quality would look like in the classroom.

More information

Department of Anatomy Bylaws

Department of Anatomy Bylaws Department of Anatomy Bylaws Approved: June 9, 2003 Section I. Introduction These Bylaws: 1. provide for faculty participation in the Department, in accordance with the collective bargaining agreement

More information

Gain an understanding of the End of Year Documentation Process. Gain an understanding of Support

Gain an understanding of the End of Year Documentation Process. Gain an understanding of Support Objectives Gain an understanding of the End of Year Documentation Process Gain an understanding of the Summative Evaluation Process Revisit the Four Level Ratings Rubric Gain an understanding of Support

More information

Exceptional Student Education Monitoring and Assistance On-Site Visit Report Sarasota County School District February 12-14, 2014

Exceptional Student Education Monitoring and Assistance On-Site Visit Report Sarasota County School District February 12-14, 2014 2013-14 Exceptional Student Education Monitoring and Assistance On-Site Visit Report Sarasota County School District February 12-14, 2014 Florida Department of Education Bureau of Exceptional Education

More information

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

$0/5&/5 '$*-*5503 %5 /-:45 */4536$5*0/- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF $0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF ROCKWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTENT FACILITATOR, DATA ANALYST, AND INSTRUCTIONAL

More information

Greta Bornemann (360) Patty Stephens (360)

Greta Bornemann (360) Patty Stephens (360) Patty Stephens (360) 725-6440 Patty.Stephens@k12.wa.us Greta Bornemann (360) 725-6352 Greta.Bornemann@k12.wa.us Agenda Goal: Provide information to help educators and students adjust to changes in mathematics

More information

VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status

VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status University of Baltimore VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status Approved by University Faculty Senate 2/11/09 Approved by Attorney General s Office 2/12/09 Approved by Provost 2/24/09

More information

BEST PRACTICES FOR PRINCIPAL SELECTION

BEST PRACTICES FOR PRINCIPAL SELECTION BEST PRACTICES FOR PRINCIPAL SELECTION This document guides councils through legal requirements and suggested best practices of the principal selection process. These suggested steps are written with the

More information

Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program

Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program Background Initial, Standard Professional I (SP I) licenses are issued to teachers with fewer than three years of appropriate teaching experience (normally

More information

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act Summary In today s competitive global economy, our education system must prepare every student to be successful

More information

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS REVISED BY THE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS ANALYSIS

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS REVISED BY THE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS ANALYSIS BILL #: HB 269 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS REVISED BY THE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS ANALYSIS RELATING TO: SPONSOR(S): School District Best Financial Management Practices Reviews Representatives

More information

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION 300-37 Administrative Procedure 360 STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION Background Maintaining a comprehensive system of student assessment and evaluation is an integral component of the teaching-learning

More information

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Title I Comparability 2009-2010 Title I provides federal financial assistance to school districts to provide supplemental educational services

More information

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011) Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011) Health professions education programs - Conceptual framework The University of Rochester interdisciplinary program in Health Professions

More information

INDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM

INDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM INSTRUCTION BOARD POLICY BP6158 INDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM The Governing Board authorizes independent study as a voluntary alternative instructional setting by which students may reach curricular objectives

More information

World s Best Workforce Plan

World s Best Workforce Plan 2017-18 World s Best Workforce Plan District or Charter Name: PiM Arts High School, 4110-07 Contact Person Name and Position Matt McFarlane, Executive Director In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section

More information

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation I. ELT Design is Driven by Focused School-wide Priorities The school s ELT design (schedule, staff, instructional approaches, assessment systems, budget) is driven by no more than three school-wide priorities,

More information

Programme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate

Programme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate Programme Specification MSc in International Real Estate IRE GUIDE OCTOBER 2014 ROYAL AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, CIRENCESTER PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MSc International Real Estate NB The information contained

More information

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs Basic Skills Plus Legislation and Guidelines Hope Opportunity Jobs Page 2 of 7 Basic Skills Plus Legislation When the North Carolina General Assembly passed the 2010 budget bill, one of their legislative

More information

Emerald Coast Career Institute N

Emerald Coast Career Institute N Okaloosa County School District Emerald Coast Career Institute N 2017-18 School Improvement Plan Okaloosa - 0791 - - 2017-18 SIP 500 ALABAMA ST, Crestview, FL 32536 [ no web address on file ] School Demographics

More information

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math- I. Current School Status: A. School Information: 1. School-Level Information: a. School: Trenton High School b. Principal's name: Cheri Langford c. School Advisory Council chair's name: Heather Rucker

More information

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY Contents: 1.0 GENERAL PRINCIPLES 2.0 FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION 3.0 IMPACT ON PARTNERS IN EDUCATION 4.0 FAIR ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION PRACTICES 5.0

More information

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

School Performance Plan Middle Schools SY 2012-2013 School Performance Plan Middle Schools 734 Middle ALternative Program @ Lombard, Principal Roger Shaw (Interim), Executive Director, Network Facilitator PLEASE REFER TO THE SCHOOL PERFORMANCE

More information

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES Section 8: General Education Title: General Education Assessment Guidelines Number (Current Format) Number (Prior Format) Date Last Revised 8.7 XIV 09/2017 Reference: BOR Policy

More information

Greetings, Ed Morris Executive Director Division of Adult and Career Education Los Angeles Unified School District

Greetings, Ed Morris Executive Director Division of Adult and Career Education Los Angeles Unified School District Greetings, The thesis of my presentation at this year s California Adult Education Administrators (CAEAA) Conference was that the imprecise and inconsistent nature of the statute authorizing adult education

More information

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY 40741-1222 Document Generated On January 13, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Description of the School System 2 System's Purpose 4 Notable

More information

Atlas Reports for NYC Quality Review & PPO 1.1 Ensure engaging, rigorous, and coherent curricula in all subjects a. Common Core Standards Analysis report for ELA & Math alignments in Grades 6-8 Atlas Reports

More information

eportfolio Guide Missouri State University

eportfolio Guide Missouri State University Social Studies eportfolio Guide Missouri State University Updated February 2014 Missouri State Portfolio Guide MoSPE & Conceptual Framework Standards QUALITY INDICATORS MoSPE 1: Content Knowledge Aligned

More information

BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1226 ADOPTED 9-24-71 AMENDED 2-3-72 5-31-77 4-26-83 2-10-88 6-7-90 5-5-94 4-27-95

More information

Short Term Action Plan (STAP)

Short Term Action Plan (STAP) Short Term Action Plan (STAP) 10/14/2017 1 Managing Complex Change Vision Skills Incentives Resources Action Plan Assessment Meaningful Change Skills Incentives Resources Action Plan Assessment Confusion

More information

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

Chart 5: Overview of standard C Chart 5: Overview of standard C Overview of levels of achievement of the standards in section C Indicate with X the levels of achievement for the standards as identified by each subject group in the table

More information

Glenn County Special Education Local Plan Area. SELPA Agreement

Glenn County Special Education Local Plan Area. SELPA Agreement Page 1 of 10 Educational Mental Health Related Services, A Tiered Approach Draft Final March 21, 2012 Introduction Until 6-30-10, special education students with severe socio-emotional problems who did

More information

Timeline. Recommendations

Timeline. Recommendations Introduction Advanced Placement Course Credit Alignment Recommendations In 2007, the State of Ohio Legislature passed legislation mandating the Board of Regents to recommend and the Chancellor to adopt

More information

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Site-based Participant Syllabus

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Site-based Participant Syllabus Course Description This course is designed to help K-12 teachers navigate the ever-growing complexities of the education profession while simultaneously helping them to balance their lives and careers.

More information

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008 E&R Report No. 08.29 February 2009 NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008 Authors: Dina Bulgakov-Cooke, Ph.D., and Nancy Baenen ABSTRACT North

More information

ADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY

ADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY ADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY William Carter, Director of Admission College Hall 140. MSC 128. Extension 2315. Texas A&M University-Kingsville adheres to high standards of academic excellence and admits

More information

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year: AB104 Adult Education Block Grant Performance Year: 2015-2016 Funding source: AB104, Section 39, Article 9 Version 1 Release: October 9, 2015 Reporting & Submission Process Required Funding Recipient Content

More information

Race to the Top (RttT) Monthly Report for US Department of Education (USED) NC RttT February 2014

Race to the Top (RttT) Monthly Report for US Department of Education (USED) NC RttT February 2014 Race to the Top (RttT) Monthly Report for US Department of Education (USED) NC RttT February 2014 Please provide information in the following areas: Activities completed this month Activities projected

More information

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION A Framework for Continuous School Improvement Planning (Summer 2009) GETTING RESULTS Continuous School Improvement Plan Gen 6-2 Year Plan Required for Schools in School

More information

DAS-REMI District Accountability System Reporting, Evaluating, and Monitoring Instrument for the P2E2020SBP

DAS-REMI District Accountability System Reporting, Evaluating, and Monitoring Instrument for the P2E2020SBP DAS-REMI District Accountability System Reporting, Evaluating, and Monitoring Instrument for the P2E2020SBP Prepared by the Board Accountability Committee DAS REMI 2015-16 1 Board Approved: September 2,

More information

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL Overview of the Doctor of Philosophy Board The Doctor of Philosophy Board (DPB) is a standing committee of the Johns Hopkins University that reports

More information

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12) PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12) Standard I.* Standard II.* Standard III.* Standard IV. The teacher designs instruction appropriate for all students that reflects an understanding

More information

School Improvement Fieldbook A Guide to Support College and Career Ready Graduates School Improvement Plan

School Improvement Fieldbook A Guide to Support College and Career Ready Graduates School Improvement Plan School Improvement Plan July 2012 Page 1 of 16 SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN School Name: Pickens High School District Name: Pickens County Principal Name: Chris LeMieux School Year: 2015-16 Title I Schoolwide

More information

African American Male Achievement Update

African American Male Achievement Update Report from the Department of Research, Evaluation, and Assessment Number 8 January 16, 2009 African American Male Achievement Update AUTHOR: Hope E. White, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist Department

More information

Applying Florida s Planning and Problem-Solving Process (Using RtI Data) in Virtual Settings

Applying Florida s Planning and Problem-Solving Process (Using RtI Data) in Virtual Settings Applying Florida s Planning and Problem-Solving Process (Using RtI Data) in Virtual Settings As Florida s educational system continues to engage in systemic reform resulting in integrated efforts toward

More information

College of Business University of South Florida St. Petersburg Governance Document As Amended by the College Faculty on February 10, 2014

College of Business University of South Florida St. Petersburg Governance Document As Amended by the College Faculty on February 10, 2014 College of Business University of South Florida St. Petersburg Governance Document As Amended by the College Faculty on February 10, 2014 Administrative Structure for Academic Policy Purpose: The administrative

More information

BSW Student Performance Review Process

BSW Student Performance Review Process BSW Student Performance Review Process Students are continuously evaluated in the classroom, the university setting, and field placements to determine their suitability for the social work profession.

More information

Northwest-Shoals Community College - Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual 1-1. Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual I. INTRODUCTION

Northwest-Shoals Community College - Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual 1-1. Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual I. INTRODUCTION Northwest-Shoals Community College - Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual 1-1 Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual I. INTRODUCTION Northwest-Shoals Community College - Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual 1-2 I. INTRODUCTION

More information

5 Early years providers

5 Early years providers 5 Early years providers What this chapter covers This chapter explains the action early years providers should take to meet their duties in relation to identifying and supporting all children with special

More information

K-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)

K-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI) K-12 Academic Intervention Plan Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI) September 2016 June 2018 2016 2018 K 12 Academic Intervention Plan Table of Contents AIS Overview...Page

More information

Historical Overview of Georgia s Standards. Dr. John Barge, State School Superintendent

Historical Overview of Georgia s Standards. Dr. John Barge, State School Superintendent Historical Overview of Georgia s Standards Dr. John Barge, State School Superintendent Georgia s Comprehensive Plan for Education Improvement College and Career Georgia Performance Standards (CCGPS) ELA

More information