Coach Evaluation Rubric
|
|
- Hester Edwards
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Coach Evaluation Rubric Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Distinguished Evidence 1a. Demonstrating knowledge of content and pedagogy 1b. Demonstrating knowledge and skill level of district/school/ program and educators Coach has little or no familiarity with specialty areas (e.g., autism, behavior, instruction/ intervention practices, assessment, MTSS) and knowledge of coaching skills and strategies (e.g., coaching stances, interpersonal styles, feedback, systems change). Is unable to translate evidence and research into strategies. little to no knowledge of the needs of the district/program and/or the specific educators to guide the interaction and coaching supports. Coach lacks knowledge of the district philosophy and resources. basic knowledge of specialty areas (e.g., autism, behavior, instruction/intervention practices, assessment, MTSS) aligned to research based practices and knowledge of coaching skills and strategies (e.g., coaching stances, interpersonal styles, feedback, system change). Coach has some awareness of prerequisite learning, but knowledge may be inaccurate or incomplete and/or displays lack of awareness of how concepts relate to one another. basic knowledge of the needs of the district/program and/or the specific educators to guide the interaction and coaching supports. Coach has limited knowledge of the district philosophy and resources. thorough knowledge of specialty areas (e.g., autism, behavior, instruction/ intervention practices, assessment, MTSS) aligned to research based practices and knowledge of coaching skills and strategies (e.g., coaching stances, interpersonal styles, feedback, systems changes). thorough knowledge of the needs of the district/ program and/or specific educators to guide the interaction and coaching supports. Seeks out necessary unknown information, if appropriate. Coach displays understanding of district philosophy and resources. extensive knowledge of specialty areas (autism, behavior, instruction/ intervention practices, assessment, MTSS) aligned to research based practices and knowledge of coaching skills and strategies (e.g., coaching stances, interpersonal styles, feedback, systems change). Coach is able to anticipate ways to address possible misconceptions. Coach serves as a leader in this area and is sought out by colleagues. extensive knowledge of the needs of the district/program and/or specific educators to guide coaching interactions and supports that are aligned to the district s philosophy and resources. Coach seeks input from appropriate stakeholders and uses data to guide supports and help shape future district/school/
2 program improvement goals. 1c. Establishing goals for coachees (i.e., district/school /program and educators) 1d. Demonstrating knowledge of resources, both within and beyond school district 1e. Developing a comprehensive coaching plan little to no knowledge of district/school/program goals. Coaching goals are not linked to district/school/program goals, lack ambition and feasibility. Goals do not link to sustainable practices. Coach displays little understanding of resources and does not utilize the information. Coaching plan does not link to developed goals or goals are unrealistic. The plan for achieving district/school/program goals is not differentiated or takes into account knowledge and skill level of district/school/program. knowledge of district/school/program and educator goals and this knowledge is inconsistently used to formulate coaching goals. Coaching goals meet minimal standards and may be feasible. Coach may formulate goals in isolation. Coach displays basic knowledge of resources available for staff to advance their skills and can adequately utilize the information, but may not seek to expand this knowledge. Some aspects of the coaching plan directly links to goals developed in conjunction with district/school/program. Timelines for goals maybe unrealistic. The plan for achieving district/school/ program goals may not take into account knowledge and skill level of knowledge of district/school/program initiatives and educator needs and uses this knowledge to formulate coaching goals. Coaching goals are ambitious and feasible, reflecting important learning and big ideas of school improvement and student growth. Goals are aligned to building capacity and sustainable practices. Coach has thorough knowledge of resources available within district and in the larger professional community for staff to advance their skills, and seeks out such resources to support coaching goals. Majority of coaching plan directly links to goals developed in conjunction with district/school/program. Development of differentiated coaching plan includes activities that facilitate capacity building and sustainability. Plan Coach collaborates with district/school/program in using data to develop improvement goals to build capacity and sustainable practices. Coaching goals are ambitious and feasible, reflecting important learning and big ideas of school improvement and student growth. Co-developed goals are aligned to building capacity and sustainable practices within the district/school/program. Coach has an extensive knowledge of resources, actively seeks out new resources to enrich staff skills and provides supports to facilitate use of information by the district/school/program. Coach serves as a leader in this area and is sought out by colleagues. All aspects of coaching plan directly links to goals developed in collaboration with district/school/program. Development of differentiated coaching plan includes activities that facilitate capacity building and sustainability. Plan reflects knowledge and skill
3 1f. Designing an evaluation plan Evaluation plan does not match district/school/program goals. No formative assessments have been identified. Evaluation procedures lack criteria and no plan to adjust based on data. district/school/program. Only some of district/school/program goals are identified in the evaluation plan. Formative assessments somewhat match expectations. Decision making guidelines are not fully developed and possible plan adjustments are not clearly linked to data. reflects knowledge and skill level of district/school/ program and realistic time expectations. Clearly identified evaluation plan outlined for goals/outcomes developed for school/district/program. The plan includes formative assessments that appropriately match expectations. Evaluation plan includes decision making guidelines and possible adjustments based on formative assessment data. level of district/school/program, realistic time expectations and allows for district/school/ program choice in how to achieve the goals. Clearly identified evaluation plan outlined for goals/outcomes developed for school/district/program. The plan includes formative assessments that appropriately match expectations. Evaluation plan actively involves the district/school/program in developing and collecting information for use in decision making and possible adjustments based on formative assessment data.
4 Domain 2: The Environment Component Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished Evidence 2a Creating an environment of respect and rapport 2b. Establishing a culture for learning Coach s interactions toward coachee(s) are inappropriate and/or negative; Coachee(s) appear uncomfortable in the coaching environment. insensitivity to responding to challenging behaviors and needs of coachee(s). Coach communicates there is little to no purpose of the coaching activity and/or goal. Coach ignores or disregards coachees skills and knowledge and fails to provide supports when needed. Coachees are disengaged in the coaching task or activity. Coach-coachee interactions are a mix of positive and negative; attempts to make positive connects with coachee(s) are not entirely successful. Coach s response to challenging behavior from coachee(s) is partially successful. Coach communicates the coaching activity and/or goal focus is to complete specific tasks with little to no purpose of why tasks are important. Coach shows high regards for only some coachees skills and knowledge. Coachees exhibit limited commitment to the coaching task or activity. Coach-coachee interactions are friendly and demonstrate general caring and respect. Coachee responds successfully to disrespectful or challenging behavior from coachee(s). Coachee(s) engage in the coaching process, but may be hesitant to contribute their own ideas. Coachee(s) exhibit respect for the coach. Coach communicates the purpose of the coaching activity and/or goal. Coach demonstrates a high regard for coachees skills and knowledge. Coach conveys an expectation of high levels of coachee involvement and engagement in the coaching process. Interactions between coach and coachee(s) are highly respectful, reflecting genuine warmth, caring, and sensitivity to coachees as individuals. There is no disrespectful behavior among coachee(s). When there is disagreement, mutual respect is demonstrated. Coachee(s) feels comfortable to engage in the coaching process without hesitating to contribute their own ideas. Coach respects and encourages coachee efforts and skills. Coach communicates passion, including purpose and rationale, for the coaching activity and/or goal. Coach demonstrates high regard for coachees skills and knowledge and encourages ownership of practices for contextual fit. Through questions and comments, coachees indicate a desire to understand the skill/content and take initiative in improving upon the coaching plan, goals or work.
5 2c. Managing coaching procedures 2d. Managing coachee interactions 2e. Organizing physical space Coach has no or ineffective teaming strategies to manage coaching routines, resulting in a significant loss of coaching time. Coachees are unclear on coaching routines and procedures. Coachee participation is minimal or considerable amount of time is spent offtask. No coaching standards of conduct have been established. Coach s response to coachee s challenging, disrespectful or resistant interactions fails to promote a climate of mutual respect and is often disrespectful. Coach makes poor use of the physical environment, resulting in low engagement of participants, lost instructional time, and/or little alignment between the physical arrangement and the coaching activities. No use of technology or use There is some loss of coaching time due to coach having partially effective teaming strategies to manage coaching routines. Coachees may be unclear on coaching routines and require frequent guidance and prompting to follow established procedures. Coachee participation is uneven. Coach s efforts to establish and implement standards of conduct are partially successfully. Coach inconsistently responds to coachee s challenging, disrespectful or resistant interactions by referring back to established standards of conduct and using facilitating strategies that promote mutual respect. The arrangement of the physical environment does not impede on the coaching goals, resulting in inconsistent engagement of participants. Limited use of technology or other resources are utilized or used inappropriately. Coach has well established effective teaming strategies to manage coaching routines (i.e., agendas, roles and responsibilities, visual frameworks, working agreements, goals, professional development learning objectives) so there is little loss of coaching time. With minimal guidance and prompting, coachees follow established routines and procedures and participate accordingly. Coaching standards of conduct have been established and implemented successfully. Coach consistently and respectfully responds to coachee s challenging, disrespectful or resistant interactions by referring back to established standards of conduct and using facilitating strategies that promote mutual respect. Coach makes good use of the physical environment, arranging the room to foster engagement in the coaching activity by the majority of participants. Use of technology is appropriate and supports engagement and learning objectives. Coaching time is maximized due to efficient and seamless routines and procedures with minimal to no prompting by the coach. Coachees take initiative in establishing effective meeting and teaming practices. Routines are well understood and may be initiated by coachees. Coaching standards of conduct have been established and implemented successfully in collaboration with coachee(s). All interactions are highly respectful and professional to all involved. Coachees take an active role in monitoring their own interactions and that of other coachees against the established professional standards of conduct. Coach s arrangement of the physical environment is highly aligned to coaching activity/goals, whereas all participants are actively engaged. Extensive use of technology (high and low tec) is highly appropriate, aligned toward goals, engages all participants and serves as a
6 inappropriately. model for others. Participants initiate and engage in arranging physical environment.
7 Domain 3: Delivery of Service Component Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Distinguished Evidence 3a. Communicating effectively in the coaching relationship 3b. Using coaching stems, questioning and discussion techniques Coach fails to communicate the expectations and purpose of the coaching interaction effectively. Coach is not explicit in identifying goals and what coaching supports are needed. Coach s written and oral language is inappropriate and inaccurate. Coach does not use language, stems and questions during interaction with coachee(s) and fails to shift coaching stance (coach, collaborator, consultant). Limited to no participation of all coachee(s) within the coaching interaction. Coach partially communicates the expectations and purpose of the coaching interaction effectively. Coach is not explicit in identifying steps, timelines, resources needed to meet established goals and what coaching supports are needed. Coach s written and oral language is inconsistent related to appropriateness and accuracy. Coach uses inconsistent language, stems and questioning techniques that may or may not be aligned with the appropriate coaching stance (coach, collaborator, consultant). Inconsistent participation of coachee(s) within the coaching interaction occurs. Coach communicates the expectations and purpose of the coaching interaction effectively. Coach is explicit in identifying steps, timelines, resources needed to meet established goals and what coaching supports are needed. Coach s written and oral language is appropriate and accurate. Coach uses language, stems and questioning techniques that are aligned with the appropriate coaching stance (coach, collaborator, consultant) based on understanding and contributions of coachee(s). Coach is able to shift stance within a coaching interaction and elicits participation of all coachee(s) within the coaching interaction. Coach uses appropriate language in addition to examples to articulate the content and points out possible areas of misconceptions. Coach is explicit in identifying goals and what coaching supports are needed. Coachee(s) are able to communicate the expectations and purpose of the coaching process effectively. Coach s written and oral language is appropriate and accurate. Coachee(s) are able to articulate key concepts and implementation practices accurately. Coach uses language, stems and questioning techniques that are aligned with the appropriate coaching stance (coach, collaborator, consultant) based on understanding and contributions of coachee(s).coach seamlessly shifts coaching stance within a coaching interaction. Coachee(s) are active participants and able to extend and enrich the coaching interaction. Coach builds upon and uses
8 coachee(s) responses in order to deepen coachee(s) understanding. 3c. Engaging coachee(s) (e.g., teacher, grade level team, problem solving team, district leadership team, participants in training) in learning 3d. Using assessment to guide coaching plan and supports Coach fails to use a gradual release of responsibility to develop capacity of coachee(s). Coachee(s) are not actively engaged in the coaching interaction. Coach fails to outline criteria for success and/or data sources to measure progress towards goal. Coach does not analyze data to evaluate progress or align coaching supports. Coach inconsistently uses gradual release of responsibility and uses limited activities, tools and data to develop capacity of coachee(s) in coaching interactions. Coachee(s) engagement is limited and may or may not practice implementation process alongside coach ( We do ). Coach outlines criteria for success but data sources to measure progress towards goal are misaligned or not identified. Coach does not engage the coachee(s) in analysis. Coach inconsistently uses data to match coaching supports to goals. Coach uses gradual release of responsibility to develop capacity of coachee(s) by using a variety of activities, tools and data to model ( I do ) and lead ( We do ) coachee(s) in relevant coaching interactions. Coachee(s) is actively engaged and practices implementation process alongside coach ( We do ). Coach outlines criteria for success and data sources to measure progress towards goal. Coach engages the coachee(s) in analysis to assess progress and determine coaching supports to meet goals. Coach uses gradual release of responsibility to maintain capacity of coachee(s) by using a variety of activities, tools and data to promote independence ( You do ) of coachee(s) in relevant coaching interactions. Coachee(s) is actively engaged and applies implementation process independently ( You do ) with reflection and feedback with coach. Coachee(s) takes initiative to apply, adapt, or modify the tools and processes to make it more relevant to their needs. Coachee fully understands criteria for success. Coach and coachee(s) collaborate to outline criteria and data sources to measure progress towards goal. Coachee takes increasing ownership in process of data analysis to assess progress, and coach and coachee collaborate to guide supports.
9 3e. Demonstrating professional flexibility & responsiveness 3f. Positive student impact Coach adheres and persists to his/her coaching plan, in spite of evidence of its inadequacy or inappropriateness. Coach participates in the analysis of data and development of intervention plan. Data collection toward goal is inconsistent or nonexistent. Student impact is minimal or no growth evident. Coach understands coachee(s) priorities and is responsive in making adjustments at times. Coach struggles with identifying strategies when encountering resistance in coaching. Coach references use of the problem solving process when working with coachees in analyzing assessment information to develop and implement an intervention plan based on identified need. Plan is inconsistently monitored and evaluated, resulting in some of the goals being met. Coach shows consideration for coachee(s) identified priorities and/or approaches. Coach makes adjustments and accommodations to meet the needs that arise in the moment. Coach persists, even when encountering resistance, by drawing on a number of strategies to engage the coachee(s). Through use of the problem solving process, coach facilitates coachees in using assessment information to identify a need, develop and implement an intervention plan aligned to prioritized need. Coach assists in data collection and evaluation of progress toward goal, resulting in the majority of goals being met. Coach attempts to meet the needs of all coachee(s) by utilizing a broad range of approaches and making adjustments when needed. The coach seeks out assistance from a variety of resources, within and outside school/district. Through use of the problem solving process, coach facilitates coachees in using assessment information to identify a need, develop and implement an intervention plan aligned to prioritized need(s). Coach assists in data collection and evaluation of progress toward goal, resulting in a positive impact on student growth as evident by all goals being met or exceeded.
10 Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities Component Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished Evidence 4a. Reflecting on coaching Coach misjudges the effectiveness of the coaching plan and activities. The coach makes no suggestions to improve the coaching approach. Coach has general sense of whether or not the coaching plan and activities were effective. The coach can make general suggestions to improve the coaching approach, but lacks specific strategies. Coach accurately reflects and assesses the effectiveness of the coaching plan and activities. The coach identifies a few specific strategies that may improve the coaching approach. Coach s self assessment of the coaching plan is thoughtful and includes specific indicators of practices that were and were not effective. The coach s specific suggestions for improvement draw on an extensive repertoire and are likely to be effective to improve the coaching approach. 4b. Maintaining accurate records Fails to maintain coaching records. Records are routinely submitted late and are disorganized, providing incorrect or confusing information. Maintains some coaching records. Records are sometimes submitted on time and may be inaccurate and inefficient in recording necessary coaching information. Maintains coaching records (e.g., coaching logs, coaching goals and updates, referral forms, program evaluation tools) that are complete, accurate and well organized. Records are submitted on time and are efficient and effective in recording necessary coaching information. Maintains coaching records (e.g., coaching logs, coaching goals and updates, referral forms, program evaluation tools) that are complete, accurate and well organized. Records are submitted on time and without the need for reminders. Coach makes recommendations on ways to improve efficiency and effectiveness of records. 4c. Communicating with stakeholders (e.g., students, educators, administrators, families, community members) Communication little or no information to stakeholders regarding the coaching plan. Does not attempt to engage stakeholders or responds in a manner that is not culturally sensitive. Communicates infrequent or incomplete information about the coaching plan to stakeholders. Demonstrates some cultural sensitivity in communications. Communicates frequently and thoughtfully with stakeholders in a culturally sensitive manner. Provides information regarding progress toward goals, identification of needs and possible resources or coaching supports. Attempts to engage stakeholders in the coaching plan. Communicates with stakeholders frequently and very thoughtfully in a culturally sensitive manner regarding progress toward goals, identification of needs and possible resources or coaching supports. Engages stakeholders to contribute and take part in the coaching plan. Stakeholders serve as advocates for themselves and educational teams. 4d.Participating in Coach s relationships Coach s relationships Coach has supportive and Coach takes a leadership role in
11 a professional community 4e. Growing and developing professionally 4f. Showing professionalism, including integrity and confidentiality with colleagues are negative or self-serving. Avoids participation in activities related to professional growth or in other school committees or professional learning communities. Coach is not involved in any activity that might enhance knowledge or skill. Coach purposefully resists discussing performance with supervisors or colleagues. Coach ignored invitations to join professional organizations or attend conferences. The coach is dishonest. The coach fails to notice the needs of coachee(s). The coach engages in practices that are selfserving. The coach willfully rejects district regulations. with colleagues are cordial. Participates in activities related to professional growth or in committees, professional learning communities, when invited (does not initiate participation). Coach participates in professional activities when they are required or provided by the district. The coach reluctantly accepts feedback from supervisors and colleagues. The coach contributes in a limited fashion to professional organizations. The coach is honest. The coach notices the needs of coachee(s) but is inconsistent in addressing them. The coach unknowingly supports school practices that may result in poor outcomes. The coach makes decisions professionally but on a limited basis. The coach complies with district regulations. collaborative relationships with colleagues. Coach frequently participates in activities related to professional growth. Coach volunteers and actively participates in committees, professional learning communities, positively impacting school/district. Coach seeks regular opportunities for continued professional development. Coach welcomes colleagues and supervisors into meetings and trainings for the purposes of gaining insight from their feedback. The coach actively participates in organizations designed to contribute to the profession. Coach is honest and known for having high standards of integrity. Coach actively addresses needs of coachee(s). Coach actively works to provide opportunities for coachee(s) success. Coach willingly participates in district/school/team decision making. Coach complies completely with district regulations. promoting activities related to professional growth. Coach regularly contributes to and leads events that positively impact school improvement. Coach regularly contributes to and leads committees, professional learning communities and demonstrates leadership beyond his/her role. Coach seeks regular opportunities for continued professional development, including initiating action research/projects. Coach actively seeks feedback from colleagues and supervisors. The coach takes an active leadership role in professional organizations in order to contribute to the profession. Coach is considered a leader in terms of honesty, integrity, and confidentiality. Coach is highly proactive in serving coachee(s). Coach makes a concerted effort to ensure opportunities are available for all coachee(s) to be successful. Coach takes a leadership role in district/school/team decision making, including development/refinement of district regulations.
12
Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year:
Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year: 2014-2015 Name Evaluator Contributing Evaluator Program Grade Site Observat ion Date: Observation Date Post-Conference Date Additional Observation Date-As Needed
More informationSPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM
SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM (Revised 11/2014) 1 Fern Ridge Schools Specialist Performance Review and Evaluation System TABLE OF CONTENTS Timeline of Teacher Evaluation and Observations
More informationFinal Teach For America Interim Certification Program
Teach For America Interim Certification Program Program Rubric Overview The Teach For America (TFA) Interim Certification Program Rubric was designed to provide formative and summative feedback to TFA
More information4a: Reflecting on Teaching
Domain 4: 4a: Reflecting on Teaching Professional Responsibilities Reflecting on teaching encompasses the teacher s thinking that follows any instructional event, an analysis of the many decisions made
More informationKENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING
KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING With Specialist Frameworks for Other Professionals To be used for the pilot of the Other Professional Growth and Effectiveness System ONLY! School Library Media Specialists
More informationSchool Leadership Rubrics
School Leadership Rubrics The School Leadership Rubrics define a range of observable leadership and instructional practices that characterize more and less effective schools. These rubrics provide a metric
More information$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF
$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF ROCKWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTENT FACILITATOR, DATA ANALYST, AND INSTRUCTIONAL
More informationQualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools
Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools Updated November 2013 DC Public Charter School Board 3333 14 th Street NW, Suite 210 Washington, DC 20010 Phone: 202-328-2600 Fax: 202-328-2661 Table
More informationPEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)
PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12) Standard I.* Standard II.* Standard III.* Standard IV. The teacher designs instruction appropriate for all students that reflects an understanding
More informationWest Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA
Georgia Teacher Academy for Preparation and Pedagogy Pathways to Certification West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA 20220 770-583-2528 www.westgaresa.org 1 Georgia s Teacher Academy Preparation
More informationIndicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.
Domain 1- The Learner and Learning 1a: Learner Development The teacher understands how learners grow and develop, recognizing that patterns of learning and development vary individually within and across
More informationScoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.
Adolescence and Young Adulthood SOCIAL STUDIES HISTORY For retake candidates who began the Certification process in 2013-14 and earlier. Part 1 provides you with the tools to understand and interpret your
More informationSTANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION
Arizona Department of Education Tom Horne, Superintendent of Public Instruction STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 5 REVISED EDITION Arizona Department of Education School Effectiveness Division
More informationQueen's Clinical Investigator Program: In- Training Evaluation Form
Queen's Clinical Investigator Program: In- Training Evaluation Form Name of trainee: Date of meeting: Thesis/Project title: Can the project be completed within the recommended timelines 2 years MSc - 4/5
More informationExpanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation
I. ELT Design is Driven by Focused School-wide Priorities The school s ELT design (schedule, staff, instructional approaches, assessment systems, budget) is driven by no more than three school-wide priorities,
More informationDelaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators
Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators DPAS-II Guide (Revised) for Teachers Updated August 2017 Table of Contents I. Introduction to DPAS II Purpose of
More informationCalifornia Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)
Standard 1 STANDARD 1: DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A SHARED VISION Education leaders facilitate the development and implementation of a shared vision of learning and growth of all students. Element
More informationPersonal Tutoring at Staffordshire University
Personal Tutoring at Staffordshire University Staff Guidelines 1 Contents Introduction 3 Staff Development for Personal Tutors 3 Roles and responsibilities of personal tutors 3 Frequency of meetings 4
More informationA Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners
A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners About Our Approach At Pivot Learning Partners (PLP), we help school districts build the systems, structures, and processes
More informationDESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0
DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0 QUALITY RUBRIC FOR STEM PHILANTHROPY This rubric aims to help companies gauge the quality of their philanthropic efforts to boost learning in science, technology, engineering
More informationEarly Warning System Implementation Guide
Linking Research and Resources for Better High Schools betterhighschools.org September 2010 Early Warning System Implementation Guide For use with the National High School Center s Early Warning System
More informationPerson Centered Positive Behavior Support Plan (PC PBS) Report Scoring Criteria & Checklist (Rev ) P. 1 of 8
Scoring Criteria & Checklist (Rev. 3 5 07) P. 1 of 8 Name: Case Name: Case #: Rater: Date: Critical Features Note: The plan needs to meet all of the critical features listed below, and needs to obtain
More informationField Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program
Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program Together we Shape the Future through Excellence in Teaching, Scholarship, and Leadership College of Education
More informationShort Term Action Plan (STAP)
Short Term Action Plan (STAP) 10/14/2017 1 Managing Complex Change Vision Skills Incentives Resources Action Plan Assessment Meaningful Change Skills Incentives Resources Action Plan Assessment Confusion
More informationStrategic Practice: Career Practitioner Case Study
Strategic Practice: Career Practitioner Case Study heidi Lund 1 Interpersonal conflict has one of the most negative impacts on today s workplaces. It reduces productivity, increases gossip, and I believe
More informationSpecial Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster
Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster Drayton Infant School Drayton CE Junior School Ghost Hill Infant School & Nursery Nightingale First School Taverham VC CE
More informationDelaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators
Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators DPAS-II Guide for Administrators (Assistant Principals) Guide for Evaluating Assistant Principals Revised August
More informationOffice: Bacon Hall 316B. Office Phone:
Buffalo State College State University College at Buffalo Department of Elementary Education & Reading School of Education Course Information: PRACTICUM IN STUDENT TEACHING Course Number #: Semester: Spring
More informationLincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal
ISS Administrative Searches is pleased to announce Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal Seeks Elementary Principal Application Deadline: October 30, 2017 Visit the ISS Administrative Searches webpage to view
More informationEQuIP Review Feedback
EQuIP Review Feedback Lesson/Unit Name: On the Rainy River and The Red Convertible (Module 4, Unit 1) Content Area: English language arts Grade Level: 11 Dimension I Alignment to the Depth of the CCSS
More informationBSW Student Performance Review Process
BSW Student Performance Review Process Students are continuously evaluated in the classroom, the university setting, and field placements to determine their suitability for the social work profession.
More informationKentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations
Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning Included in this section are the: Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations Kentucky New Teacher Standards (Note: For your reference, the KDE website
More informationRUBRICS FOR M.TECH PROJECT EVALUATION Rubrics Review. Review # Agenda Assessment Review Assessment Weightage Over all Weightage Review 1
GURU NANAK DEV ENGINEERING COLLEGE, LUDHIANA An Autonomous College Under UGC Act [2(f) 12(B)] (Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering) RUBRICS FOR M.TECH PROJECT EVALUATION Rubrics Review
More informationTAI TEAM ASSESSMENT INVENTORY
TAI TEAM ASSESSMENT INVENTORY By Robin L. Elledge Steven L. Phillips, Ph.D. QUESTIONNAIRE & SCORING BOOKLET Name: Date: By Robin L. Elledge Steven L. Phillips, Ph.D. OVERVIEW The Team Assessment Inventory
More informationLEAD AGENCY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
LEAD AGENCY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) describes and confirms an Agreement between Lincoln Public Schools / Lincoln Community Learning Centers (CLC) and. The purpose
More informationIndiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process
Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning ICPBL Certification mission is to PBL Certification Process ICPBL Processing Center c/o CELL 1400 East Hanna Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46227 (317) 791-5702
More informationArkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio
Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio Guidelines, Rubrics, and Requirements 2 THE EXIT PORTFOLIO A s-based Presentation of Evidence for the Licensure of Beginning Teachers Purpose:
More informationSecondary English-Language Arts
Secondary English-Language Arts Assessment Handbook January 2013 edtpa_secela_01 edtpa stems from a twenty-five-year history of developing performance-based assessments of teaching quality and effectiveness.
More informationProfessional Experience - Mentor Information
Professional Experience - Mentor Information EDU40006 Ready to Teach Early Childhood: Practicum 5E Required days: 20 days full time. Any missed days must be made up. Required setting: Preschool Early Childhood
More informationThe Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3
The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3 The State Board adopted the Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework (December 2009) as guidance for the State, districts, and schools
More informationSSIS SEL Edition Overview Fall 2017
Image by Photographer s Name (Credit in black type) or Image by Photographer s Name (Credit in white type) Use of the new SSIS-SEL Edition for Screening, Assessing, Intervention Planning, and Progress
More informationStandards for Professional Practice
Standards for Professional Practice 1.0. Teaching and Assessment 1.1. Systematically individualize instructional variables to maximize the learning outcomes of individuals with exceptionalities. 1.2. Identify
More informationTHE FIELD LEARNING PLAN
THE FIELD LEARNING PLAN School of Social Work - University of Pittsburgh FOUNDATION FIELD PLACEMENT Term: Fall Year: 2009 Student's Name: THE STUDENT Field Liaison: Name of Agency/Organization: Agency/Organization
More informationEMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES
KAHNAWAKE EDUCATION CENTER P.O. BOX 1000 KAHNAWAKE, QUEBEC J0L 1B0 TEL: (450) 632-8770 FAX: (450) 632-8042 EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES LOCATION: POSITION: SALARY RANGE: DURATION: REQUIREMENTS: KARONHIANONHNHA
More informationPSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016
PSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016 Instructor: Gary Alderman Office Location: Kinard 110B Office Hours: Mon: 11:45-3:30; Tues: 10:30-12:30 Email: aldermang@winthrop.edu Phone:
More informationNORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual
NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual Policy Identification Priority: Twenty-first Century Professionals Category: Qualifications and Evaluations Policy ID Number: TCP-C-006 Policy Title:
More informationWith guidance, use images of a relevant/suggested. Research a
Learning Focus/Criteria Emerging Developing Evolving AO1 DEVELOP AND INVESTIGATE Develop ideas through investigations inforstudentd by contextual and other sources, demonstrating analytical and cultural
More informationTASK 2: INSTRUCTION COMMENTARY
TASK 2: INSTRUCTION COMMENTARY Respond to the prompts below (no more than 7 single-spaced pages, including prompts) by typing your responses within the brackets following each prompt. Do not delete or
More informationIntroduction to the Common European Framework (CEF)
Introduction to the Common European Framework (CEF) The Common European Framework is a common reference for describing language learning, teaching, and assessment. In order to facilitate both teaching
More informationMidterm Evaluation of Student Teachers
Midterm Evaluation of Student Teachers Please complete and return form to the EKU student teaching supervisor on or before midterm week Student Teacher EKU ID # Subject/ Grade(s) Cooperating Teacher s
More informationResearcher Development Assessment A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities
Researcher Development Assessment A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities Domain A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities This domain relates to the knowledge and intellectual abilities needed to be able
More informationA Guide to Student Portfolios
A Guide to Student Portfolios School Counseling Program Department of Counseling & School Psychology Southern Connecticut State University Revised 2/28/12 Contents Portfolios The Basics... 3 A Portfolio
More informationRubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis
FYE Program at Marquette University Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis Writing Conventions INTEGRATING SOURCE MATERIAL 3 Proficient Outcome Effectively expresses purpose in the introduction
More informationCommon Core Postsecondary Collaborative
Common Core Postsecondary Collaborative Year One Learning Lab April 25, 2013 Sheraton Wild Horse Pass Chandler, Arizona At this Learning Lab, we will share and discuss An Overview of Common Core Postsecondary
More informationPROFESSIONAL PATHWAYS. for TEACHERS. PPf T SUPPORT GUIDE
PROFESSIONAL PATHWAYS for TEACHERS PPf T SUPPORT GUIDE Background...2 Purpose Guiding Principles...3 Overview of the System...4 Instructional Practice...5 Professional Growth and Responsibilities...15
More informationAssessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)
Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011) Health professions education programs - Conceptual framework The University of Rochester interdisciplinary program in Health Professions
More informationCEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales
CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency s CEFR CEFR OVERALL ORAL PRODUCTION Has a good command of idiomatic expressions and colloquialisms with awareness of connotative levels of meaning. Can convey
More informationIMPORTANT STEPS WHEN BUILDING A NEW TEAM
IMPORTANT STEPS WHEN BUILDING A NEW TEAM This article outlines essential steps in forming a new team. These steps are also useful for existing teams that are interested in assessing their format and effectiveness.
More information1. Answer the questions below on the Lesson Planning Response Document.
Module for Lateral Entry Teachers Lesson Planning Introductory Information about Understanding by Design (UbD) (Sources: Wiggins, G. & McTighte, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.;
More informationEvery curriculum policy starts from this policy and expands the detail in relation to the specific requirements of each policy s field.
1. WE BELIEVE We believe a successful Teaching and Learning Policy enables all children to be effective learners; to have the confidence to take responsibility for their own learning; understand what it
More informationED : Methods for Teaching EC-6 Social Studies, Language Arts and Fine Arts
ED487.001 80166: Methods for Teaching EC-6 Social Studies, Language Arts and Fine Arts Spring 2012 Mondays 4:00-6:45 1/23/2012 through 5/07/2012 Location: Pleasant Grove Intermediate School Room 310 (Red
More informationInstructional Intervention/Progress Monitoring (IIPM) Model Pre/Referral Process. and. Special Education Comprehensive Evaluation.
Instructional Intervention/Progress Monitoring (IIPM) Model Pre/Referral Process and Special Education Comprehensive Evaluation for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CLD) Students Guidelines and Resources
More informationCORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16
SUBJECT: Career and Technical Education GRADE LEVEL: 9, 10, 11, 12 COURSE TITLE: COURSE CODE: 8909010 Introduction to the Teaching Profession CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS
More informationPractice Examination IREB
IREB Examination Requirements Engineering Advanced Level Elicitation and Consolidation Practice Examination Questionnaire: Set_EN_2013_Public_1.2 Syllabus: Version 1.0 Passed Failed Total number of points
More informationTentative School Practicum/Internship Guide Subject to Change
04/2017 1 Tentative School Practicum/Internship Guide Subject to Change Practicum and Internship Packet For Students, Interns, and Site Supervisors COUN 6290 School Counseling Practicum And COUN 6291 School
More informationSpecial Education Services Program/Service Descriptions
Special Education Services Program/Service Descriptions SES Program/Service Characteristics Specially Designed Instruction Level Class Size Autism (AU) A developmental disability significantly affecting
More informationTRAITS OF GOOD WRITING
TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING Each paper was scored on a scale of - on the following traits of good writing: Ideas and Content: Organization: Voice: Word Choice: Sentence Fluency: Conventions: The ideas are clear,
More informationPROFESSIONAL PATHWAYS. for TEACHERS. PPf T SUPPORT GUIDE
PROFESSIONAL PATHWAYS for TEACHERS PPf T SUPPORT GUIDE Background...2 Purpose Guiding Principles...3 Overview of the System...4 Instructional Practice...5 Professional Growth and Responsibilities...15
More informationStudent Course Evaluation Survey Form
Appendix I Student Course Evaluation Survey Form LaSalle College Vancouver aims to meet the highest teaching standards and to offer students a quality learning experience. Therefore, the College is committed
More informationDIOCESE OF PLYMOUTH VICARIATE FOR EVANGELISATION CATECHESIS AND SCHOOLS
DIOCESE OF PLYMOUTH VICARIATE FOR EVANGELISATION CATECHESIS AND SCHOOLS St. Boniface Catholic College Boniface Lane Plymouth Devon PL5 3AG URN 113558 Head Teacher: Mr Frank Ashcroft Chair of Governors:
More informationSelf Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT
Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT 84341-5600 Document Generated On June 13, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Standard 1: Purpose and Direction 2 Standard 2: Governance
More informationFOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)
FOR TEACHERS ONLY The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION CCE ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core) Wednesday, June 14, 2017 9:15 a.m. to 12:15 p.m., only SCORING KEY AND
More informationGENERAL COMPETITION INFORMATION
GENERAL COMPETITION INFORMATION All students wishing to compete at the Educators Rising National Conference must complete 3 required steps: 1 Be a member of Educators Rising with an active profile in the
More informationDr. Charles Barnum Elementary School Improvement Plan
Dr. Charles Barnum Elementary School Improvement Plan 2014-2015 The mission of Dr. Charles Barnum Elementary School, in partnership with our community is to provide a safe, nurturing and challenging learning
More informationChart 5: Overview of standard C
Chart 5: Overview of standard C Overview of levels of achievement of the standards in section C Indicate with X the levels of achievement for the standards as identified by each subject group in the table
More informationCREATE YOUR OWN INFOMERCIAL
CREATE YOUR OWN INFOMERCIAL LES TEACHER GUIDE Secondary Cycle 2 Document realised by: BAILLARGEON, Sophie CARON, Claudia CLOUTIER, Maude DANNEAU, Vicky KING, Adèle WINTER 2013 CREATE YOUR OWN INFOMERCIAL---
More informationProfessional Learning Suite Framework Edition Domain 3 Course Index
Domain 3: Instruction Professional Learning Suite Framework Edition Domain 3 Course Index Courses included in the Professional Learning Suite Framework Edition related to Domain 3 of the Framework for
More informationWORK OF LEADERS GROUP REPORT
WORK OF LEADERS GROUP REPORT ASSESSMENT TO ACTION. Sample Report (9 People) Thursday, February 0, 016 This report is provided by: Your Company 13 Main Street Smithtown, MN 531 www.yourcompany.com INTRODUCTION
More informationEDIT 576 DL1 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2014 August 25 October 12, 2014 Fully Online Course
GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM EDIT 576 DL1 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall
More informationHIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN
HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview 1 Eligible Credit Flexibility Plans 2 Earned Credit from Credit Flexibility Plans 2 Student Athletes 3 Application Process 3 Final
More informationGENERAL COMPETITION INFORMATION
GENERAL COMPETITION INFORMATION All students wishing to compete at the Educators Rising National Conference must complete 3 required steps: 1 Be a member of Educators Rising with an active profile in the
More informationSeven Keys to a Positive Learning Environment in Your Classroom. Study Guide
Seven Keys to a Positive Learning Environment in Your Classroom By Tom Hierck Study Guide This study guide is a companion to the book Seven Keys to a Positive Learning Environment in Your Classroom by
More informationTEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS. Directive Teaching Quality Standard Applicable to the Provision of Basic Education in Alberta
Standards of Teaching Practice TEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS BASED ON: Policy, Regulations and Forms Manual Section 4 Ministerial Orders and Directives Directive 4.2.1 - Teaching Quality Standard Applicable
More informationGuidelines for Project I Delivery and Assessment Department of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering Lebanese American University
Guidelines for Project I Delivery and Assessment Department of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering Lebanese American University Approved: July 6, 2009 Amended: July 28, 2009 Amended: October 30, 2009
More informationDEPARTMENT OF KINESIOLOGY AND SPORT MANAGEMENT
DEPARTMENT OF KINESIOLOGY AND SPORT MANAGEMENT Undergraduate Sport Management Internship Guide SPMT 4076 (Version 2017.1) Box 43011 Lubbock, TX 79409-3011 Phone: (806) 834-2905 Email: Diane.nichols@ttu.edu
More informationRUBRICS FOR MAJOR PROJECT EVALUATION
Rubrics Review RUBRICS FOR MAJOR PROJECT EVALUATION Review # Agenda Assessment Review Over all Assess Weightage ment Weight age Review 1 Review 2 Project Synopsis/ Rubric R1 Proposal (30) 25% Evaluation
More informationContract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)
Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4) Evidence Used in Evaluation Rubric (5) Evaluation Cycle: Training (6) Evaluation Cycle: Annual Orientation (7) Evaluation Cycle:
More informationApplying Florida s Planning and Problem-Solving Process (Using RtI Data) in Virtual Settings
Applying Florida s Planning and Problem-Solving Process (Using RtI Data) in Virtual Settings As Florida s educational system continues to engage in systemic reform resulting in integrated efforts toward
More informationStatistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics
5/22/2012 Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics College of Menominee Nation & University of Wisconsin
More informationSY 6200 Behavioral Assessment, Analysis, and Intervention Spring 2016, 3 Credits
SY 6200 Behavioral Assessment, Analysis, and Intervention Spring 2016, 3 Credits Instructor: Christina Flanders, Psy.D., NCSP Office: Samuel Read Hall, Rm 303 Email: caflanders1@plymouth.edu Office Hours:
More informationMath Pathways Task Force Recommendations February Background
Math Pathways Task Force Recommendations February 2017 Background In October 2011, Oklahoma joined Complete College America (CCA) to increase the number of degrees and certificates earned in Oklahoma.
More informationPEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE
PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE DR. BEV FREEDMAN B. Freedman OISE/Norway 2015 LEARNING LEADERS ARE Discuss and share.. THE PURPOSEFUL OF CLASSROOM/SCHOOL OBSERVATIONS IS TO OBSERVE
More informationCarolina Course Evaluation Item Bank Last Revised Fall 2009
Carolina Course Evaluation Item Bank Last Revised Fall 2009 Items Appearing on the Standard Carolina Course Evaluation Instrument Core Items Instructor and Course Characteristics Results are intended for
More informationYouth Mental Health First Aid Instructor Application
Youth Mental Health First Aid Instructor Application April 6 10, 2015 Somerset Church of the Brethren Overview: Becoming a Mental Health First Aid Instructor Becoming a Mental Health First Aid instructor
More informationGeorge Mason University Graduate School of Education
George Mason University Graduate School of Education Course Syllabus, Spring 2011 Syllabus for EDSE 702: Managing Resources for Special Education Programs (3 credits) Spring, 2010 Section 6E5 Professor:
More informationQueensborough Public Library (Queens, NY) CCSS Guidance for TASC Professional Development Curriculum
CCSS Guidance for TASC Professional Development Curriculum Queensborough Public Library (Queens, NY) DRAFT Version 1 5/19/2015 CCSS Guidance for NYSED TASC Curriculum Development Background Victory Productions,
More informationSECTION I: Strategic Planning Background and Approach
JOHNS CREEK HIGH SCHOOL STRATEGIC PLAN SY 2014/15 SY 2016/17 APPROVED AUGUST 2014 SECTION I: Strategic Planning Background and Approach In May 2012, the Georgia Board of Education voted to make Fulton
More informationPresentation 4 23 May 2017 Erasmus+ LOAF Project, Vilnius, Lithuania Dr Declan Kennedy, Department of Education, University College Cork, Ireland.
The role of rubrics in making the assessment visible and clear Presentation 4 23 May 2017 Erasmus+ LOAF Project, Vilnius, Lithuania Dr Declan Kennedy, Department of Education, University College Cork,
More informationKAHNAWÀ: KE EDUCATION CENTER P.O BOX 1000 KAHNAW À:KE, QC J0L 1B0 Tel: Fax:
KAHNAWÀ: KE EDUCATION CENTER P.O BOX 1000 KAHNAW À:KE, QC J0L 1B0 Tel: 450 632-8770 Fax: 450 632-8042 JOB DESCRIPTION SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER ASSISTANT August 2013 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION: The teacher assistant,
More informationVolunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,
Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan, 2005-2010 Mission: Volunteer State Community College is a public, comprehensive community college offering associate degrees, certificates, continuing
More information