The Smarter Balanced Assessment System: An Overview

Transcription

1 The Smarter Balanced Assessment System: An Overview Joe Willhoft, Ph.D. Executive Director NAESP Webinar September 18, 2012

2 Issues Addressed in Today s Webinar How will these assessments be different from our current state assessments? Will all states use the same cut scores? Who makes decisions for Smarter Balanced? How will being in Smarter Balanced help my school? How will teachers and school leaders be involved? What is the timetable/roll-out for these new assessments?

3 Common Core State Standards Define the knowledge and skills students need for college and career Developed voluntarily and cooperatively by states; more than 40 states have adopted Provide clear, consistent standards in English language arts/literacy and mathematics Source:

4 A Next Generation of Assessments US Dept. of Ed has funded two consortia of states with development grants for new assessments aligned to Common Core State Standards Rigorous assessment of progress toward college and career readiness Common cut scores across all Consortium states Provide both achievement and growth information Valid, reliable, and fair for all students, except those with significant cognitive disabilities Administered online Use multiple measures Operational in school year (Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 68 / Friday, April 9, 2010 pp )

5 Smarter Balanced: A State-led Consortium

6 25 states representing 40% of K-12 students 21 governing, 4 advisory states Washington state is fiscal agent WestEd provides project management services A National Consortium of States

7 Smarter Balanced Theory of Action: Seven Key Principles 1. An integrated system 2. Evidence-based approach 3. Teacher involvement 4. State-led with transparent governance 5. Focus: improving teaching and learning 6. Actionable information multiple measures 7. Established professional standards

8 The Smarter Balanced Assessment System

9 A Balanced Assessment System Common Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career readiness Summative: College and career readiness assessments for accountability Teachers and schools have information and tools they need to improve teaching and learning All students leave high school college and career ready Formative resources: Supporting classroom-based assessments to improve instruction Interim: Flexible and open assessments, used for actionable feedback

10 Summative Assessments for Accountability Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) Portion Built on solid technology Coverage of full breadth/depth of Common Core Precise assessment of all students Performance Task (PT) Portion Setting Performance Standards (Cut Scores) Deeper learning with thematic and scenario-based tasks Real-world problems aligned to Common Core PT scores combined with CAT for overall score K-12, higher ed, business, and policymakers part of decision-making Broad review of Achievement Level Descriptors Field testing includes PISA, TIMSS, NAEP items Longitudinal data systems used for triangulation Page 10

11 Interim Assessments to Signal Improvement Flexible Non-Secure Timing and frequency are locally determined Interim test-builder creates aligned assessments Supports Proficiency Based Instruction Teachers can match assessments with scope and sequence Teachers can review student responses Teachers can score student responses Authentic Measures Includes full range of item types Uses the same scale as the Summative Assessment Includes performance assessments Page 11

12 Summative and Interim Use of Computer Adaptive Technology Faster results, fewer items Deeper Analysis Increased precision Tailored to student ability Greater security Mature technology Turnaround time is significantly reduced Can assess broad range with fewer items Reports for classrooms and schools draw from the full range of items seen by many students Accurate measurement across range of students Improved measures of student growth over time Item difficulty based on student responses Large item pool means not all students receive the same questions GMAT, GRE, COMPASS (ACT), Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) Page 12

13 Formative Tools for Classroom- Based Assessment Practices Improving Instruction Tools/materials for Classroom-based Assessments Fully aligned to Common Core State Standards Available for in-service and pre-service development Pooling Resources Access to the best resources available Collaborate with other states on special projects Professional social networking across the Consortium Tools to evaluate publishers tests Page 13

14 A Balanced Assessment System English Language Arts/Literacy and Mathematics, Grades 3-8 and High School School Year Last 12 weeks of the year* DIGITAL CLEARINGHOUSE OF FORMATIVE TOOLS, PROCESSES AND EXEMPLARS Released items and tasks; Model curriculum units; Educator training; Professional development tools and resources; Scorer training modules; Teacher collaboration tools; Evaluation of publishers assessments. Optional Interim Assessment Computer Adaptive Assessment and Performance Tasks Optional Interim Assessment Computer Adaptive Assessment and Performance Tasks PERFORMANCE TASKS ELA/Literacy Mathematics COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TESTS ELA/Literacy Mathematics Scope, sequence, number and timing of interim assessments locally determined Re-take option *Time windows may be adjusted based on results from the research agenda and final implementation decisions.

15 Engaging Educators

16 K-12 Educator Involvement Support for implementation of the Common Core State Standards ( ) Write and review items/tasks for the for the pilot test ( ) and field test ( ) Development of educator leadership teams in each state ( ) Evaluate formative assessment practices and curriculum tools for inclusion in digital library ( ) Score portions of the interim and summative assessments ( and beyond)

17 Higher Education Collaboration Involved 175 public and 13 private systems/institutions of higher education in application Two higher education reps on the Executive Committee Higher education lead in each state and higher education faculty participating in work groups Goal: The high school assessment qualifies students for entry-level, credit-bearing coursework in college or university

18 Progress and Timeline

19 Assessment Claims for ELA / Literacy Overall Claim (Gr. 3-8) Students can demonstrate progress toward college and career readiness in English Language arts and literacy. Overall Claim (High School) Students can demonstrate college and career readiness in English language arts and literacy. Reading Students can read closely and analytically to comprehend a range of increasingly complex literary and informational texts. Writing Students can produce effective and well-grounded writing for a range of purposes and audiences. Speaking and Listening Students can employ effective speaking and listening skills for a range of purposes and audiences. Research/Inquiry Students can engage in research and inquiry to investigate topics, and to analyze, integrate, and present information.

20 Assessment Claims for Mathematics Overall Claim (Gr. 3-8) Students can demonstrate progress toward college and career readiness in mathematics. Overall Claim (High School) Students can demonstrate college and career readiness in mathematics. Concepts and Procedures Problem Solving Communicating Reasoning Modeling and Data Analysis Students can explain and apply mathematical concepts and interpret and carry out mathematical procedures with precision and fluency. Students can solve a range of complex well-posed problems in pure and applied mathematics, making productive use of knowledge and problem solving strategies. Students can clearly and precisely construct viable arguments to support their own reasoning and to critique the reasoning of others. Students can analyze complex, real-world scenarios and can construct and use mathematical models to interpret and solve problems.

21 Technology Guidelines for New Purchases (v1.0 Apr. 2012) Minimum for New Hardware Processor Speed RAM Available Memory/Storage Resolution Display Size 1.0 GHz 1 GB 1 GB 1024x Class Operating Systems Windows 7 Mac 10.7 Linux (Ubuntu 11.10; Fedora 16) Chrome Apple ios Android 4.0 Desktops, laptops, netbooks (Windows, Mac, Chrome, Linux), thin client, and tablets (ipad, Windows, and Android) will be compatible devices provided they are configured to meet the established hardware, operating system, and networking specifications -- and are able to be locked down. 21

22 Major Milestones All-Call for Pilot Testing All-Call for Field Testing Interim & Formative Available for Use Item/Task Writing Begins State Educator Teams Begin Set Performance Standards (Cut Scores) Operational Summative Assessment IT Readiness (Round 1) IT Readiness (Round 2) IT Readiness (Round 3) Verify Performance Standards Cognitive Labs & Field Trials Pilot of 10,000 Items/Tasks Field Test 37,000 Items/Tasks

23 Released Items & Tasks

24 Item Development Process Early 2012: Assessment claims for ELA/literacy and mathematics approved April 2012: Item/task specifications and review guidelines complete June 2012: Training modules available for item writers/reviewers Summer 2012: Educators from Governing States begin writing items and tasks; cognitive labs / small scale trials begin October 8, 2012: Sample items available February / March 2013: Pilot Test of first 10,000 items and performance tasks

25 Purpose of the Sample Items Illustrate rigor and complexity of ELA/literacy and mathematics items on Smarter Balanced assessments Signal to educators the shifts in instruction that will be required to help students meet the demands of the Common Core and new assessments Showcase variety of item types: Selected response Constructed response Technology enhanced Performance tasks

26 Exploring the Sample Items Accessed online through a simulated test platform Viewable by: Grade band (3-5, 6-8, and high school) Content claim Select types (technology enhanced and performance tasks) Themes to illustrate learning across grades and difficulty progressions Metadata for each item/task includes: Grade level Smarter Balanced content claim & assessment target Alignment to Common Core State Standards Brief descriptions Selected scoring rubrics Selected response and technology enhanced items are machine scorable Online feedback and phone support available

27 Accessibility and Accommodations Sample items do not include accessibility and accommodations features Full range of accessibility tools and accommodations options under development guided by: Magda Chia, Ph.D., Director of Support for Under- Represented Students Accessibility and Accommodations Work Group Students with Disabilities Advisory Committee Chair: Martha Thurlow (NCEO) English Language Learners Advisory Committee Co-Chairs: Jamal Abedi (UC Davis) & Kenji Hakuta (Stanford)

28 Visit us at: SmarterBalanced.org