NC State University Re Visioning Documents

Transcription

1 Program: NC TEACH Lateral Entry (French K 12) Program Coordinators: Dr. Grant Holley, Alison Winzeler A. A description of how the proposed program has been re visioned to reflect the North Carolina Standard for Teachers and the 21 st century knowledge, skills, and dispositions embedded in them and the rationale for the changes. Program Description: The NC TEACH French K 12 program (initial license, post baccalaureate) has undergone substantial review and revision based on the new NC Professional Teaching Standards, 21 st Century knowledge, skills, and dispositions, a new general education program for the university, and extensive collaborative review with practitioners and faculty from the College of Education and NC TEACH to create a re visioned teacher education program that prepares NC TEACH French teachers for K 12 classrooms. The re visioned program is 18 SCH and integrates a set of core pedagogy courses, field experiences, and required noncredit professional development seminars to provide lateral entry or pre service teachers with high capacity in the NCPTS as well as a set of knowledge, skills, and dispositions developed through a set of distinctive program parameters for the core pedagogy courses and experiences (Assessment, Collaboration, Diversity, Field Experiences, Technology, Globalization, see Section B). North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards: Standard Summary Evidence I. Leadership NC TEACH students will be exposed to collaboration throughout their NC TEACH course work through direct instruction and integrated activities in class as well as in their own classrooms as lateral entry teachers or student teachers. One particular assignment will require students to choose a School Improvement Plan goal of the school where they teach and design and present a plan that executes the goal. Collaborative activities will involve working with their peers and K 12 French teachers in the field to develop, deliver and assess lessons. ECI 474 and 476 are classes that require students to explore topics related to essential skills and concepts needed by beginning teachers. The class focuses on questioning, test preparation, discussion skills, familiarity with national standards, multiple teaching strategies, diversity, special education, technology, ESL, and assessment and evaluation of students. Evidence 6 II. Respectful Environment Candidates will demonstrate their ability to establish a respectful environment for a diverse population of students in the lessons/units they design in ECI 473 (Subject Specific Methods) They will implement the lessons their Lateral Entry positions or their student teaching placements. Evidence 3 Evidence 4 III. Content IV. Facilitate Learning Students admitted into the NC TEACH program must hold a baccalaureate degree, have a minimum of 24 SCH in content courses, and have a 2.5 cum undergraduate GPA. The NC TEACH program of studies includes an additional 18 SCH in content specific pedagogical courses including ECI 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, and 476. The Subject Specific Methods Course (ECI 473) will focus on the five core standards for Foreign Language learning that students will create lessons that must be used in Lateral Entry teaching or student teaching and will be given opportunities to reflect on their lessons. The Super Saturdays course (ECI 474 and ECI 475) will focus on the parameters (assessment, diversity, collaboration, technology, field experience, and globalization) we have established in regards to creating and dispersing digital information. V. Reflection Analyzing data, reflecting on lesson plans, participating in professional development seminars, and considering new ways of improving their teaching delivery are all key elements to shaping teachers who are reflective. Our Methods courses (ECI 472 and 473), Lateral Entry or student teaching, and Super Saturdays are designed to enable NC TEACHers to recognize the ways in which an early attentiveness to professional growth is critical to enabling them to achieve their professional goals. Evidence 1 Evidence 2 Evidence 2 Evidence 3 Evidence 5 Evidence 3 Evidence 5 Evidence 6 21 st Century Knowledge, Skills, and Dispositions

2 Standard Reading Comprehension Written Communication Oral Communication Mathematics Science Social Studies Fine and Performing Arts Global Awareness Financial, Economic, Business and Entrepreneurial Literacy Civic Literacy Health Literacy Learning and Innovation Skills Life and Career Skills Information, Media, and Technology Skills Summary/Evidence NC TEACH required application essays answer the following questions with attention to grammar, organization, elaboration, and conventions of standard written English: Describe any recent opportunities to observe/participate in a public school classroom. Describe your experiences working with high school and/or middle school students. Describe your teaching experience. What influenced your decision to enter the teaching profession? Describe today's teenager. What are your goals as a teacher? Describe what a successful day of teaching would look/sound like. What do you think will be your biggest challenge as a teacher? Grade of C or better on Demonstration Lesson in ECI 473. For this Demonstration lesson, students will teach a sample lesson to their NC TEACH French cohort. Grade of C or better in ECI 474 and ECI 476 (Super Saturdays) wherein students deliver a cohort Diversity presentation. Candidates develop units within the program which include lessons incorporating 21 st Century content and skills. Those lessons are implemented and evaluated on a regular basis. An example of the candidates capacity to design and deliver 21 st content is highlighted in Evidences 3 and 5 within the program. The common core courses of the NC TEACH program emphasize learning and innovation. NC TEACH course work requires them to apply their content knowledge to strategies for teaching and learning in the public schools. Students in the K 12 French Education NC TEACH program participate in 2 Technology workshops as part of the Super Saturday seminars (ECI 474 and 476). NC TEACH Students participate in 2 Technology Super Saturdays as a part of ECI 474 and ECI 476. Instructors model best practices for the integration of technology to make teaching and learning more powerful and authentic. Students are encouraged to create technology rich unit plans and teaching activities for their future classrooms and utilize the resources made available to them in the s Media Center. NC TEACH students are encouraged to attend and participate in technology sharing sessions, seminars, and workshops that are offered by the and the University. NC TEACH Application Essays Evidence 3 Evidence 6 Evidence 3 Evidence 5 Evidence 6 ECI 474 and ECI 476 Evidence 3 ECI 474 and ECI 476 Current & Proposed Program Professional Education Current NC TEACH French K 12 Curriculum ECI 471: Educational Implications of Learning and Developmental Theory ECI 472: Interaction of Classroom Management and Instruction ECI 473: Subject Specific Methods ECI 474: Curriculum and Instruction Practices I ECI 475: Peer Mentoring in Alternative Licensure ECI 476: Curriculum and Instruction Practices II Proposed NC TEACH French K 12 Curriculum ECI 471 Revised ECI 472 to prepare students to create Evidences 3 and 5 Revised ECI 473 to prepare students to create Evidences 3 and 5 Revised ECI 474 to prepare students to present Evidence 6 ECI 475 Revised ECI 476 to prepare students to present Evidence 6 2

3 Content French Curriculum Field Experiences Passing scores on Praxis II 2 observations in ECI 472 AND Lateral Entry position Or 2 observations in ECI 472 AND Student Teaching Option Passing scores on Praxis II 2 observations in ECI 472 AND Lateral Entry position Or 2 observations in ECI 472 AND Student Teaching Option B. How public school partners were involved in the re visioning of the program and how they will be involved in the delivery and evaluation of the program. (1 2 pages maximum) During the Spring and Fall of 2008, the convened several focus groups for discussion of the following two questions: What should teachers in North Carolina know and be able to do in 2012 and beyond? and How can a pre service teacher education program help them to develop that set of knowledge, skills, and dispositions? From these discussion with 1) the University Council on Teacher Education (includes faculty and administrators across campus, teachers and administrators from the public schools of Wake, Johnston, and other counties, as well as community representatives like Carolyn McKinney) 2) a UNC Tomorrow focus group of faculty and community stakeholders, 3) a focus group of Community Members and Practitioners (intentionally weighted toward representatives of African American, Hispanic, and Native American Community Agencies, the Governor s Office, and Social Service Agencies in Wake County), and 4) at the Spring Faculty Retreat of College of Education. Analysis of the content of each of the focus group discussions yielded six themes. These themes were developed into six parameters which have served as guides to the re visioning process for each of the teacher education programs at NC State. The six parameters include: Assessment, Collaboration, Diversity, Field Experiences, Globalization, and Technology. In February 2009, the NC TEACH Steering Committee specifically discussed the re visioning of the NC TEACH curriculum to accommodate and reflect the new evidences. The Committee outlined modifications to the NC TEACH curriculum to integrate the North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards and the 21 st Century skills. Subsequently, in the months that followed, NC TEACH administrators wrote rubrics and assignments that would encapsulate the evidences of the new teacher education evaluation instruments. 3

4 Program: NC TEACH French K 12 Program Coordinators: Dr. Grant Holley, Alison Winzeler C. The electronic evidences the institution will use to demonstrate candidates meet the standards. The template to be used for this section of the proposal is detailed in the following pages. It is to include: 1. A brief description of the evidence and the descriptors of the element of the standards it addresses. (Section I of the template) 2. A matrix showing where each descriptor of the elements of each standard is included in the key evidences. (Section II of the template) 3. A detailed description of the evidence, how it specifically addresses the descriptors of the element for which it is cited, and how it is evaluated by the institution. (Section III of the template)

5 SECTION I: Key Evidences Evidence Name Description Elements Addressed 1 Content Knowledge: Evidence that demonstrates breadth of content knowledge in the specialty area. Transcript or Praxis II scores Copy of transcript with at least 24 semester hours of coursework relevant to French with a grade of C (2.0) or better in each of the 24 hours OR satisfactory Praxis II scores. 3b.1 2 Content Knowledge: Evidence that demonstrates candidate depth of understanding and application of content knowledge in the specialty area. 3 Pedagogical and Professional Knowledge Skills and Dispositions: Evidence that demonstrates effective design of classroom instruction based on research verified practice. 4 Pedagogical and Professional Knowledge Skills and Dispositions: Evidence that demonstrates knowledge, skills, and dispositions in practice. 5 Positive Impact on Student Learning: Evidence that demonstrates impact on student learning. French Content Knowledge Unit Plan LEA/IHE Certification of Teaching Capacity Assessing Learning Candidate demonstration of depth of understanding and application of content knowledge on a topic area in French Candidates will create a teaching unit that will contain information about the instructional context, at least three lesson plans, and a reflection. Lesson plans will include performance objectives from the NC Standard Course of Study (NCSCOS) and should include the relative Core Standards for the discipline. The unit plan should demonstrate a variety of instructional strategies that reflect an understanding of current pedagogy for core subjects, relevance for 21 st century learners, inclusion of information, media, and technology, and which are developmentally appropriate for the age group taught. The LEA/IHE Certification of Teaching Capacity will be administered during the student teaching semester as part of a more extensive evaluation process at NC State University. Candidates must score at the Met level on all items in order to be recommended for licensure Candidates will demonstrate the ability to plan, implement, and assess instruction. 3b.1 1a.2, 2b.3, 2d.1, 3a.1, 3c.1, 3c.2, 3d.1, 4a.1, 4a.2, 4b.1, 4c.1, 4d.1, 4e.1, 4f.1, 5c.1 1a.1, 1a.3, 1a.4, 1d.1, 1e.1, 2a.1, 2b.1, 2b.2, 2c.1, 2d.1, 2d.2, 3a.2, 3b.2, 3d.1, 4c.1, 4d.1, 4e.1, 4f.1, 4g.1, 4g.2, 4h.1, 4h.2, 5a.1 1a.1, 4b.1, 4h.1, 4h.2, 5a.1 6 Leadership and Collaboration: Evidence that demonstrates leadership and collaboration. Leadership & Collaboration Candidates will complete a collaboration project working in interdisciplinary teams to address one of the goals found in a School Improvement Plan. 1b.1, 1b.2, 1b.3, 1c.1, 1c.2, 2e.1, 5b.1

6 SECTION II: Relationship of the Evidence to the Standards NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER STANDARD KEY EVIDENCE(S) FROM SECTION I DEMONSTRATING THE DESCRIPTORS OF THE ELEMENTS 1. TEACHERS DEMONSTRATE LEADERSHIP a. Teachers lead in their classrooms. 1. Evaluates the progress of students toward high school graduation using a variety of assessment data measuring goals of the North Carolina Standard Course of Study. 2. Draws on appropriate data to develop classroom and instructional plans. 3. Maintains a safe and orderly classroom that facilitates student learning. 4. Uses positive management of student behavior, effective communication for defusing and deescalating disruptive or dangerous behavior, and safe and appropriate seclusion and restraint. b. Teachers demonstrate leadership in the school. 1. Engages in collaborative and collegial professional learning activities. 2. Identifies the characteristics or critical elements of a school improvement plan. 3. Displays the ability to use appropriate data to identify areas of need that should be addressed in a school improvement plan. c. Teachers lead the teaching profession. 1. Participates in professional development and growth activities.

7 KEY EVIDENCE(S) FROM SECTION I NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER STANDARD DEMONSTRATING THE DESCRIPTORS OF THE ELEMENTS 2. Begins to develop professional relationships and networks. d. Teachers advocate for schools and students. 1. Implements and adheres to policies and practices positively affecting students learning. e. Teachers demonstrate high ethical standards 1. Upholds the Code of Ethics for North Carolina Educators and the Standards for Professional Conduct. 2. TEACHERS ESTABLISH A RESPECTFUL ENVIRONMENT FOR A DIVERSE POPULATION OF STUDENTS a. Teachers provide an environment in which each child has a positive, nurturing relationship with caring adults. 1. Maintains a positive and nurturing learning environment. b. Teachers embrace diversity in the school community and in the world. 1. Appropriately uses materials or lessons that counteract stereotypes and acknowledges the contributions of all cultures. 2. Incorporates different points of view in instruction. 3. Understands the influence of diversity and plans instruction accordingly. c. Teachers treat students as individuals. 1. Maintains a learning environment that conveys high expectations of every student. d. Teachers adapt their teaching for the benefit of students with special needs. 1. Cooperates with specialists and uses resources to support the special learning needs of all students.

8 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER STANDARD 2. Uses research verified strategies to provide effective learning activities for students with special needs. KEY EVIDENCE(S) FROM SECTION I DEMONSTRATING THE DESCRIPTORS OF THE ELEMENTS e. Teachers work collaboratively with the families and significant adults in the lives of their students. 1. Communicates and collaborates with the home and community for the benefit of students. 3. TEACHERS KNOW THE CONTENT THEY TEACH a. Teachers align their instruction with the North Carolina Standard Course of Study. 1. Develops and applies lessons based on the North Carolina Standard Course of Study. 2. Integrates effective literacy instruction throughout the curriculum and across content areas to enhance students learning. b. Teachers know the content appropriate to their teaching specialty. 1. Demonstrates and appropriate level of content knowledge in the teaching specialty. 2. Encourages students to investigate the content area to expand their knowledge and satisfy their natural curiosity. c. Teachers recognize the interconnectedness of content areas/discipline. 1. Demonstrates knowledge of links between grade/subject and the North Carolina Standard Course of Study by relating content to other disciplines. 2. Relates global awareness to the subject.

9 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER STANDARD KEY EVIDENCE(S) FROM SECTION I DEMONSTRATING THE DESCRIPTORS OF THE ELEMENTS d. Teachers make instruction relevant to students. 1. Integrates 21 st century skills and content in instruction. 4. TEACHERS FACILITATE LEARNING FOR THEIR STUDENTS a. Teachers know the ways in which learning takes place, and they know the appropriate levels of intellectual, physical, social, and emotional development of their students. 1. Identifies developmental levels of individual students and plans instruction accordingly. 2. Assess and uses resources needed to address strengths and weaknesses of students. b. Teachers plan instruction appropriate for their students. 1. Collaborates with colleagues to monitor student performance and make instruction responsive to cultural differences and individual learning needs. c. Teachers use a variety of instructional methods. 1. Uses a variety of appropriate methods and materials to meet the needs of all students. d. Teachers integrate and utilize technology in their instruction. 1. Integrates technology with instruction to maximize students learning. e. Teachers help students develop critical thinking and problem solving skills. 1. Integrates specific instruction that helps students develop the ability to apply processes and strategies for critical thinking and problem solving. f. Teachers help students to work in teams and develop leadership qualities. 1. Organizes student learning teams for the purpose of developing cooperation, collaboration, and

10 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER STANDARD student leadership. KEY EVIDENCE(S) FROM SECTION I DEMONSTRATING THE DESCRIPTORS OF THE ELEMENTS g. Teachers communicate effectively. 1. Uses a variety of methods to communicate effectively with all students. 2. Consistently encourages and supports students to articulate thoughts and ideas clearly and effectively. h. Teachers use a variety of methods to assess what each student has learned. 1. Uses multiple indicators, both formative and summative, to monitor and evaluate students progress and to inform instruction. 2. Provides evidence that students attain 21 st century knowledge, skills and dispositions. 5. TEACHERS REFLECT ON THEIR PRACTICE a. Teachers analyze student learning. 1. Uses data to provide ideas about what can be done to improve students learning. b. Teachers link professional growth to their professional goals. 1. Participates in recommended activities for professional learning and development. c. Teachers function effectively in a complex, dynamic environment. 1. Uses a variety of research verified approaches to improve teaching and learning.

11 SECTION III: Detailed Description of the Evidences Evidence #1 (State Prescribed) Content Knowledge: Evidence that demonstrates breadth of general content knowledge of French. Evidence(s): Transcript or Praxis II scores Descriptors: 3b.1 The transcripts for NC TEACH candidates are individually evaluated and each candidate is provided with a specific plan of study to ensure that have completed a minimum of 24 semester hours within their content area with a grade of C or better. In addition to their prescribed program of study all candidates are required to pass the appropriate Praxis II exam in their licensure area.

12 Evidence #2 Content Knowledge: Evidence that demonstrates candidate depth of understanding and application of content knowledge in French. Evidence(s): Article written and assessed in ECI 473. Descriptors: 3b.1 Name of Evidence: Think Deeply About French Students will undertake an original investigation in their major field during ECI 473. The evidences address the descriptors for 3b.1, 3b.2 as follows: o The course is intended to be the culminating intellectual experience in which students: Explore ethical issues, develop research methods, cultivate decision making, problem solving skills and critical thinking Synthesize concepts, ideas, skills, and subject matter that they have learned in previous courses Analyze their strengths and weaknesses Demonstrate computer literacy The presentation should demonstrate the student s ability to interpret critically and analytically. Evaluation: This evidence will be evaluated based on the content standards by the university. Students must score a minimum of Proficient/Acceptable.

13 Evidence #3 Pedagogical and Professional Knowledge Skills and Dispositions: Evidence that demonstrates effective design of classroom instruction based on research verified practice. Evidence(s): Unit Plan Descriptors: 1a.2, 2b.3, 2d.1, 3a.1, 3c.1, 3c.2, 3d.1, 4a.1, 4a.2, 4b.1, 4c.1, 4d.1, 4e.1, 4f.1, 5c.1 Name of Evidence: Unit Plan Students will create a teaching unit that could be implemented during Lateral Entry teaching or student teaching. The unit plan will contain information about the instructional context, at least three lesson plans, and a reflection. Lesson plans will include performance objectives from the NC Standard Course of Study (NCSCOS) and should include the relative Core Standards for the discipline. The unit plan should demonstrate a variety of instructional strategies that reflect an understanding of current pedagogy for core subjects, relevance for 21 st century learners, inclusion of information, media, and technology, and which are developmentally appropriate for the age group taught. The evidence addresses the descriptors through the criteria as follows: I. Introduction (3a.1, 3a.2, 3b.1, 3c.1, 4b.1, 4c.1) In this section you need to describe the context of the unit plan. This should be written in such a way that readers can see your class. Be sure to include the following: A. Instructional Context o o o o The course title and unit covered for this project The number, ages, and grades of students in the class The relevant characteristics of the class that influenced your planning for this instructional sequence The relevant characteristics of the students with exceptional needs and abilities that influenced your planning for this instructional sequence; who was consulted regarding these students B. Planning o o o An overview of the topic of study and its position in the NC Standard Course of Study and the manner in which it meets the Five Core Standards for Foreign Languages ( The Five Cs ). An overview of how the unit incorporates Learning and Innovation and 21 st Century skills. A description of all collaboration and resources used to plan the unit, broad learning outcomes and objectives for the unit, and any prerequisite knowledge students should have prior to the unit. II. Three Lesson Plans (2b.2, 3a.1, 3a.2, 3c.1, 3d.1, 4a.1, 4b.1, 4c.1, 4h.1, 4h.2) In this section you will include the appropriate lesson plan format and a brief description for each lesson. The collective lesson plans must demonstrate the following: Measureable learning objectives Provisions for learners with special needs and evidence of consideration of a diverse student population Learning activities that allow students to use higher order thinking skills and creativity. Activities that allow for cooperative learning/collaboration Learning activities that allow for exploration of/through Information, Media and Technology skills A variety of lesson types (open ended exploration, application and synthesis, direct instruction, guided discovery, etc,) Use of the target language by yourself and the students Development of literacy skills (reading and writing) Opportunities for Interpretive, Interpersonal, and Presentational Communication Examination of cultural products, practices and perspectives

14 III. Reflection (2a.1, 2b2b.2, 2b.3, 2c.1, 2d.1, 2d.2, 3a.1, 3a.2, 3b.1, 3b.2, 3c.1, 3c.2, 3d.1, 4a.1, 4b.1, 4c.1, 4d.1, 4e.1, 4f.1, 4g.1, 4g.2) In this section you will reflect on your experiences of this unit plan as a whole. If you teach this plan, you can reflect after it is taught. Include the following: How do your lesson plans measure performance objectives from the NC SCOS and relate to the Core Standards? How does the unit relate to your students? Consider age group, developmental characteristics and linguistic levels. What student characteristics did you consider during your planning? Refer to learning styles, multiple intelligences, needs of exceptional students, diversity, gender, and emotional/physical/social development of your students How did you address students with special needs without calling attention to their needs? Explain how the cooperative learning activity helps students build skills in teamwork, cooperation and leadership, and how it can foster a positive classroom atmosphere. How will you manage student behavior during the lesson? Comment on the use of the target language by you and your students How did students examine the products, practices and perspectives of individuals of another culture? Evaluation: The evidences will be evaluated using a program rubric. Students must score a minimum of Proficient/Acceptable on the rubric to be considered for licensure.

15 Evidence #4 (State Prescribed) Pedagogical and Professional Knowledge Skills and Dispositions: Evidence that demonstrates knowledge, skills, and dispositions in practice. Evidence(s): LEA/IHE Certification of Teaching Capacity Descriptors: 1a.1, 1a.3, 1a.4, 1d.1, 1e.1, 2a.1, 2b.1, 2b.2, 2c.1, 2d.1, 2d.2, 3a.2, 3b.2, 3d.1, 4c.1, 4d.1, 4e.1, 4f.1, 4g.1, 4g.2, 4h.1, 4h.2, 5a.1 The LEA/IHE Certification of Teaching Capacity will be administered during Lateral Entry teaching or student teaching as part of a more extensive evaluation process at NC State University. Candidates must score at the Met level on all items in order to be recommended for licensure.

16 Name of Evidence: Assessing learning Evidence #5 Positive Impact on Student Learning: Evidence that demonstrates impact on student learning. Evidence(s): Assessing Learning Descriptors: 1a.1, 4b.1, 4h.1, 4h.2, 5a.1 Demonstrates ability to plan, implement, and assess instruction. Student will select two student responses for two different instructional prompts/activities. These should provide insight to students conceptual understanding of a topic within the context of instruction. Students will also submit a written commentary that provides a context for instructional choices and describes, analyzes, and reflects upon your teaching of this sequence. The instructional activities should reflect the NC Standard Course of Study Objectives, the Core Standards for your discipline, and a variety of instructional strategies that demonstrate your understanding of current pedagogy, diversity, inclusion of information, media and technology, relevance for 21 st century learners, and which are developmentally appropriate for the age group taught. Students will show how to assess student progress in the target language, incorporate higher order thinking skills, differentiation, and use data. The evidence addresses the descriptors through the criteria as follows: I. Introduction (2a.1, 2b.1, 2b.3, 2c.1, 2d.1, 2d.2, 3a.1, 3a.2, 3b.2, 3c.1, 3c.2, 3d.1, 4a.1, 4b.1, 4c.1, 4d.1, 4e.1, 4f.1, 4g.1, 4g.2) In this section students will describe the context of your instructional sequence and activities. This will be written in a way that the readers can see the class. Be sure to include the following: A. Instructional Context The course title and unit covered for this evidence The number, ages, and grades of the students in the class The relevant characteristics of the class that influenced your planning The relevant characteristics of the students with exceptional needs and abilities that influenced your planning; who was consulted regarding these students B. Planning An overview of the topic of study and its position in the NC Standard Course of Study and the manner in which it meets the Core Standards for your discipline. An overview of how the instructional activities incorporate Learning and Innovation and 21 st Century skills. A description of collaboration and resources used to plan, broad learning outcomes and objectives, and any prerequisite knowledge the students should have prior to the learning sequence. II. Instructional Sequence Students will select an instructional sequence from which you will choose student work in response to two instructional activities. The instructional sequence must be one in which students are engaged in communicative practices, using the target language, and working individually and cooperatively. Assessments will reflect what students can do with the language. Students will answer the following: How long is the instructional sequence? How were the results of the first assessment used to determine subsequent experiences for these students? What goals were chosen for the featured instructional sequence? Why are these goals important and appropriate for these two students? Refer to the backgrounds, experiences, and goals of these two students. What other factors influenced teacher planning? III. Analysis of Student Work (1a.1, 1a.2, 2a.1, 2b.1, 2b.3, 4a.1, 4a.2, 4c.1, 4h.1, 4h.2, 5a.1) Select two students whose responses give an opportunity to discuss practice. Choosing two students who represent different kinds of challenges may

17 readily offer such an opportunity. The focus of this evidence is on teaching practice, not the level of student performance on the assessment. Include one formative and one summative assessment. Include the following information in the assessment analysis: A. Student selection include a separate section for each student. Refer explicitly to the two featured activities and the students responses to both activities to provide concrete examples to illustrate your points. Address the following questions: Why was this student chosen? What is important to know about this student to understand and interpret her/his responses? Describe the unique characteristics of this student as a learner and as a learner of languages? What is known about this student s prior language experiences, learning preferences, backgrounds, interests, and goals? B. Impact on Student Learning What does this student s work reflect about the achievement of your learning goals and his/her conceptual understanding of the material that you presented? Teacher should show evidence that student made progress and include examples of student work as support. Describe in detail the feedback (both written and verbal) that was provided for this student and how you this feedback will foster the student s growth in this subject. IV. Reflection reflect on your experiences with this project as a whole, and how subsequent instruction was guided based on the student work analysis. Be sure to address the following: What does the work of each of the two students suggest about next steps for instruction? (What evidence reflects this?) After reviewing student responses to the activities, what would be done differently in the future (before, during or after)? What would be repeated? How were the visual and physical aspects of the classroom modified to enhance student success? How was equity and access provided to learning for all students? Based on the results of the assessments, how did instructional practice meet the needs of these students and encourage student learning? Evaluation: This evidence will be evaluated with a program rubric. Students must score a minimum of Proficient/Acceptable on the rubric.

18 Name of Evidence: Leadership & Collaboration Evidence #6 Leadership and Collaboration: Evidence that demonstrates leadership and collaboration. Evidence(s): School Improvement Plan Collaboration Project Descriptors: 1b.1, 1b.2, 1b.3, 1c.1, 1c.2, 2e.1, 5b.1 The (CED), as a part of its re visioning collectively requires one specific activity for all candidates to demonstrate their professional development, knowledge and skills. Fulfillment of this evidence will be demonstrated through presentation of a product in a content (or level) specific cohort meeting. This project demonstrates the Learning and Innovation Skills outlined in the 21 st Century Skills Framework (Creativity and Innovation; Critical Thinking and Problem Solving; and Communication and Collaboration) and the candidates capacity to utilize professional development, identify the characteristics or critical elements of a school improvement plan, develop an initiative, use appropriate data, and collaborate with others in a collegial manner. Candidates who extend this project will have the ability to demonstrate how they seek additional professional development opportunities, extend professional networks, implement school improvement activities, and communicate with colleagues, families, and other stakeholders. Directions: Each candidate in NC TEACH program will complete the Collaboration Project as the signature assignment in their Super Saturday course (ECI 474 and ECI 476). Candidates will work in subject and/or grade level specific cohorts (no more than 4 5 students per group) to develop a project to address one of the goals found in a School Improvement Plan (SIP). Teams will be expected to develop an initiative to meet the goal (and if possible implement the project in a school), included in the initiative proposal should be specific outcomes of the initiative, types of evidence to be collected, and how the evidence will be evaluated and timelines. Teams will also develop a plan for informing colleagues, parents, and students describing the initiative and a sample report detailing the conclusions of the project with recommendations. They will share and present within their cohort in ECI 474 and ECI 476. Scoring: Successful completion of the project will result in the candidate meeting each of the ACCEPTABLE elements on the attached rubric. Candidates who wish to extend the project can attach additional documentation to support their desire to be rated in the TARGET category. This documentation should include an actual report with the results of the implemented project, and a one page paper describing their experiences working in PLC s, participating in other professional development opportunities, and their participation in their professional organizations and how each of these experiences contributed to their overall goals.

19 Program: NC TEACH French (K 12) Program Coordinators: Dr. Grant Holley, Alison Winzeler D. The timeline for implementation. Program Map to 2012 Semester/Year Spring 2012 Fall 2011 Fall 2010 Fall 2009 Fall Cohort Cohort Cohort Cohort Cohort Class Category New Program Old Program* Old Program* Old Program* New Program* Courses Full Program Full Program Full Program Full Program Full Program *Student must become fully licensed by Spring 2012 in order to be eligible for Old Program. Students who complete the NC TEACH coursework and do not obtain a Lateral Entry position or Student Teach must have no fewer than three evaluations submitted by an NC TEACH administrator once they procure a Lateral Entry position.