FINAL OAC Approved

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "FINAL OAC Approved"

Transcription

1 FINAL OAC Approved Research & Decision Making Outcome Assessment Report Outcomes Assessment Committee Report Prepared by: Dr. Sarah Harris, Outcomes Assessment Coordinator College of the Sequoias, Fall 2017 Summary This report presents the results of the Outcomes and Assessment Committee s assessment of the Institutional Learning Outcomes Research & Decision Making. The committee assessed this outcome using a district-wide survey and rubric-based scoring of student-submitted research work. Survey results show students are confident in their ability to locate resources, but direct assessment indicates students would benefit from additional instruction in citation and source use. Introduction Each academic year, following an established five-year cycle, the Outcomes and Assessment Committee (OAC) conducts an assessment of one of the District s five Institutional Learning Outcomes (ILO). In , the OAC designed and completed an assessment of the Research and Decision Making ILO: Students will locate and evaluate information, including diverse perspectives, to make informed and ethical decisions. This report summarizes the assessment design, results, and committee recommendations. Institutional Planning and Accreditation Assessment of ILOs is a key component of District planning for improvement. Assessment results are presented annually to faculty and students for dialogue and discussion, including the presentation of results to governance groups. Data from this report was presented to faculty and students during Fall convocation, to the Academic Senate in November, and to Instructional Council in December. Assessment is also a key component of accreditation. Assessment of student learning outcomes is a component of ACCJC Accreditation Standards for Assuring Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness (IB), Institutional Integrity (IC), and Instructional Programs (IIA). Standards related to this report include, but are not limited to: I.B.1: The institution demonstrates a sustained, substantive and collegial dialog about student outcomes, student equity, academic quality, institutional effectiveness, and continuous improvement of student learning and achievement. I.B.6: The institution disaggregates and analyzes learning outcomes and achievement for subpopulations of students. When the institution identifies performance gaps, it implements strategies, which may include allocation or reallocation of human, fiscal and other resources, to mitigate those gaps and evaluates the efficacy of those strategies. II.A.1: All instructional programs, regardless of location or means of delivery, including distance education and correspondence education, are offered in fields of study consistent with the institution s mission, are appropriate to higher education, and culminate in

2 FINAL OAC Approved student attainment of identified student learning outcomes, and achievement of degrees, certificates, employment, or transfer to other higher education programs. Methods Feedback from the assessment of the Communication ILO included the recommendation that future ILO assessment include both direct and indirect measures, and that these measures be targeted at student learning rather than particular courses. The OAC committee therefore designed a two-part assessment process to assess the Research and Decision Making outcome, consisting of qualitative survey items and a rubric-based assessment of student-submitted research work. Indirect Assessment: Survey Items OAC Members composed two survey items for each of the five ILO s, to be added to the District-wide Student Support Services Survey distributed to students every two years. Survey items were designed as Agree/Disagree statements on a 4-point Likert scale from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree, in alignment with other items on the survey. Questions were composed and revised by committee members with input and feedback from the Office of Research, Planning, and Institutional Effectiveness (RPIE). Questions items are listed in the table below with their corresponding ILO (See Table I). Table I: Student Support Services Survey ILO Question Items Q25: Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements regarding your learning experience at COS: I listen to the positions of other people and incorporate them into my Communication own arguments when it is appropriate to do so. I am able to adjust my communication to a variety of audiences and Communication purposes. I can use information from the research resources available at COS to Research & complete my assignments. Decision Making I consider multiple perspectives when evaluating information. Research & My experiences at COS encouraged me to participate as a responsible citizen in my community (volunteering, political advocacy, and/or community-based activities). I am aware of issues that affect my community. I have successfully used mathematical methods to solve problems or interpret information. I am able to analyze complex problems and recommend possible solutions. I interact respectfully with people whose beliefs, values, and opinions are different from my own. I regularly practice good time-management and study habits. Decision Making Civic Engagement Civic Engagement Critical Thinking/ Problem Solving/ Analysis Critical Thinking/ Problem Solving Analysis Life/ Interpersonal Skills Life/ Interpersonal Skills

3 FINAL OAC Approved Direct Assessment: Rubric Scoring To directly assess students ability to locate and evaluate information, including diverse perspectives, to make informed and ethical decisions, the OAC invited a selected sample of students to submit research work completed at COS, and scored that work using trained and normed faculty raters and a committee-designed rubric. Sample Selection The OAC, with the assistance of the Office of RPIE, identified students at the District who had completed a minimum of 30 units. The list was analyzed by division to determine a target percentage for sampling. Division of student enrollment was determined based on students declared majors. Using stratified sampling, the Outcomes Assessment Coordinator identified an initial, representative sample of 500 students to contact with an invitation to participate in the study. Following an initially low response rate, an additional 500 students were added to this list using the same sampling techniques. The initial list of students with 30+ units attempted was sorted by Division and by Student ID number, a representative percentage was identified for each division, and students were randomly selected for the sample using a random number generator to choose a start and end point from the larger list. This sample was then cross-checked against Districtwide demographic data available from the District Factbook to ensure equity. This sample group of 1,000 students was contacted via campus and Canvas message with an invitation to participate in the assessment. Participation was incentivized through the opportunity to win a Starbucks gift card via random drawing. Students were asked to Please submit a sample of your work completed here at COS that shows your ability to do research. Ideally, the sample you submit should show your ability to complete research and make decisions based on that research. Samples were collected via a Canvas Course site created for the assessment. Rubric Design and Scoring An initial draft of the scoring rubric was developed by the Outcomes Coordinator using the language of the ILO and the nationally validated AAC&U VALUE Rubrics for Information Literacy, Inquiry and Analysis. This rubric was reviewed and further refined by OAC committee members, then tested using initially submitted student samples by OAC members and revised for clarity (See Appendix A: Research and Decision Making Rubric). The rubric was designed with four items on a three-point scale; a score of 10 or higher was determined to be meeting the overall ILO. Faculty raters were solicited using the District s hiring process for hourly work. Submitted work was scored by two full-time faculty members (in the Language Arts and Science Divisions), who were trained and normed in the use of the rubric by the Outcomes Assessment Coordinator. Student samples were double-blind scored in Canvas by both raters, with the Coordinator monitoring the scores for variance and requesting additional review and discussion on any items with more than one point of disagreement in the ratings. All final scores were within one point of

4 FINAL OAC Approved agreement; scores were combined and averaged on each rubric item for determination of final results. Results Indirect Assessment: Survey Items The Student Support Services Survey was distributed to District students in the Spring semester of 2017; ~1900 students responded to the ILO items specific to research (see Table II). Overall agreement on these items was very high, at over 95% for each item. Of the five ILO s, Research & Decision Making had the highest overall agreement across the two items. Survey results were disaggregated using equity measures identified in the District s equity plan, including race/ethnicity, age, gender. Results were also disaggregated by student status, firstgeneration status, and units attempted, with the goal of identifying any possible equity and/or system barriers to student learning and success. Where the number of respondents was less than ten, results were not reported to protect participants privacy. Results indicated high levels of agreement across all disaggregated survey results, with no apparent differences across demographic and other disaggregated groups. Table II: Research and Decision Making ILO Survey Results Demographic Group Characteristics % Agreement** By Enrollment Status Full-Time 97.2 Non-Credit * Part-Time 96.9 By Student Status Continuing 97.1 First-Time 99.2 First-Time Transfer 96.2 Returning 95.6 By Gender Female 97.2 Male 96.8 Other/Unknown 96 By Age 19 or less By Race/Ethnicity African-American 97.3 American Indian/Alaska Native * Asian 96.6 Filipino 97.8 Hispanic 96.8 Multi-Ethnicity 96.5 Pacific Islander * Unknown 100 White 97.7

5 FINAL OAC Approved By First-Generation Status First-Generation 97.2 Not First-Generation 97.4 Unknown 95.1 By Units Completed 29 or less All Respondents 97.5 *N < 10 respondents ** Percentage reflects an average of two survey items related to the indicated ILO. N ~ 1899 Direct Assessment: Rubric Scoring Of the students contacted, a total of 48 research samples were received from 44 students, for a response rate of 4.4%. For purposes of results reporting, individual student participants were used for demographic reporting, while all unique samples were used to report success on specific rubric items. In instances where a single student submitted more than one sample, the highest scoring sample was used for reporting. DIRECT ASSESSMENT PARTICIPANTS BY DIVISION STSV 21% AG 3% BUS 9% CFS 2% FINA 9% SOCS 18% I&T 2% LANG 2% MATH 9% SCI 7% NURS 18% Direct assessment results were disaggregated where possible using equity measures identified in the District s equity plan, including race/ethnicity, age and gender. Results were also disaggregated by units attempted, with the goal of identifying any possible equity and/or system barriers to student learning and success. Where the number of participants was less than ten, results were not reported to protect participants privacy (see Table III).

6 FINAL OAC Approved Table III: Research & Decision Making Rubric Scoring Demographic Group Characteristics % Meeting Outcome** By Gender Female 65.7% Male * Other/Unknown * By Age 19 or less * % * % 50 + By Race/Ethnicity African-American * American Indian/Alaska Native * Asian * Filipino * Hispanic 60.9% Multi-Ethnicity * Pacific Islander * Unknown * White 92.3% By Units Completed % % 90 + * All Respondents 68.2% *N < 10 respondents ** The Outcome is met by an overall rubric score of 10 or higher. N = 44 Responses were also reviewed for overall representation of Divisions, both in student enrollment and in selection of samples. Though divisions were evenly represented according to the sample selection procedures (see Direct Assessment Participants by Division), students submitted work primarily from courses in the Language Arts (45%) and Social Sciences (26%) divisions (see Direct Assessment Work Submitted by Division).

7 FINAL OAC Approved DIRECT ASSESSMENT WORK SUBMITTED BY DIVISION (EXCLUDING N/A) SOCS 26% BUS 2% CFS 5% FINA 3% SCI 8% PE 3% MATH 8% LANG 45% Scores were also disaggregated by rubric items (see Table IV). Results indicated that overall scores were higher on decision making items than on items more directly related to locating and evaluating information. Table IV: Research and Decision Making Rubric Scoring by Item Rubric Item % Meeting Outcome* Locate Information 68.8 Evaluate Information 62.5 Make Informed Decisions 72.9 Make Ethical Decisions 70.8 *N = 48 Discussion Students self-report high agreement that they can use information from the research resources available at COS to complete their assignments and that they consider multiple perspectives when evaluating information. This level of agreement shows little variance across demographic groups, and students have confidence in their ability to complete research tasks regardless of number of units completed, suggesting that accessing resources and considering multiple perspectives are skills that students may feel confident about early in their studies or prior to enrollment. Direct assessment of student-selected research work indicated close to 70% of submitted samples meet the outcome. The small number of participants in the sample means it is not possible to draw generalizable conclusions based on the sample. However, possible equity gaps in student success appear for Hispanic students, and these gaps would benefit from additional investigation.

8 FINAL OAC Approved DIRECT ASSESSMENT RESULTS BY UNITS ATTEMPTED DIRECT ASSESSMENT RESULTS BY RACE/ETHNICITY 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Meets Does Not Meet 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1 12 White Non- Hispanic Meets 9 14 Hispanic Does Not Meet Participants had slightly higher success on outcome measures related to decision making than locating and evaluating information. During scoring, raters reported that where samples were approaching success, they were most likely to have a clear purpose but less success in clearly identifying the source/s of their information, suggesting student may benefit from additional instruction in genre and audience-appropriate citation methods. The results of this assessment were shared with faulty and discussed during Fall Convocation and presented to the Academic Senate and the Board of Trustees. These discussions are reflected in the following section, which presents findings and recommendations. Findings and Recommendations 1. Equity gaps in research opportunities and/or instruction may exist for Hispanic students, but more data is necessary. Though the direct assessment sample was small, gaps in success for Hispanic students and for students with less than 60 units line up with existing District equity data on student success, basic skills placement, basic skills completion and units attempted. The high number of submitted samples from language arts/ English composition courses and Social Science courses such as Psychology and History (which carry an English 251/261 prerequisite requirement) suggest that student access to and completion of these courses is a key component of success for this outcome. However, a larger data set would be necessary to draw definitive conclusions.

9 FINAL OAC Approved Research skills and instructions should be emphasized across the curriculum, specifically in courses outside of GE English Composition and Social Science courses. Though students are doing research work in courses across multiple divisions according to outcomes mapping, students may not be connecting this work directly with the ILO. Instructors doing research work with students should make sure to emphasize the ILO and make the connection clear on related assignments. The District should also make sure research opportunities are available to students in courses that are accessible to students who place into the basic skills sequence, including instruction in resource location, usage, and citation. 3. Students are confident in their ability to do research, but would benefit from additional instruction in source use and discipline-appropriate citation methods. Survey results show students are confident in their ability to locate resources, but direct assessment indicates students would benefit from additional instruction in citation and source use. The O&A Committee will work with FEC to recommend faculty professional development on effective instructional methods to narrow this gap. The committee will also work with the library to create modules on discipline-specific citation methods that faculty can add to Canvas course shells, and will also compile and share additional available resources. Additionally, the O&A committee recommends, as a general practice, that O&A committee work closely with FEC to use assessment results to identify key professional development topics of benefit to faculty and students, and working with the Program Review committee to develop ways faculty can address assessment results, including relevant gaps identified through ILO assessment, in Program Review. 4. Future ILO assessments should continue to include a multiple methods approach, and also allow multiple methods for student participation where possible. Assessment results indicate that there can be gaps between students self-reported abilities and the direct assessment of student work, such that a multiple-measures approach provides stronger results. Soliciting work directly from students provided additional, actionable assessment results, but the number of participants in the direct assessment was very low. Suggestions for improving participation include using multiple or additional methods to collect work, including the collection of work in hard copy or through offline methods (as Canvas participation may have been a barrier for some students). Focus groups including an activity or other direct collection of work may also be effective ways to increase student participation.

10 APPENDIX A: Research and Decision Making: ILO Assessment Rubric OAC Committee Spring 2017 Students will locate and evaluate information, including diverse perspectives, to make informed and ethical decisions. Criteria Meets: 3 Developing: 2 Evidence Not Present: 1 Not Addressed: 0 Locate Information Score: The artifact includes information from a variety of sources appropriate to the relevant genre, discipline, and/or audience. The artifact includes information from limited or similar research sources; sources are not always appropriate to the relevant genre, discipline, and/or The artifact includes information from few or no identifiable sources. Sources selected are inappropriate. This artifact does not include any identifiable sources. Evaluate Information Score: Use Information to Make Informed Decisions Score: Information from sources is accompanied by enough interpretation/ evaluation to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Viewpoints of experts are contextualized or questioned. Communicates, organizes, and synthesizes information to successfully achieve a clear purpose. audience. Information from sources is accompanied by some interpretation/ evaluation. Viewpoints of experts may be contextualized but are taken mostly as fact. Communicates and organizes information in support of a purpose. Information may not be fully synthesized. Information is presented with little to no evaluation or interpretation. Viewpoints of experts are accepted without question or context. Communicates information, but information is fragmented and/or may be misquoted or misapplied. Purpose is unclear. This artifact does not include any identifiable sources. The artifact does not include any identifiable purpose.

11 Use Information to Make Ethical Decisions Score: Defines a clear purpose relevant to ethical decision making and appropriate to audience, genre, or discipline. Information is clearly and ethically referenced through citations or other disciplineappropriate methods. Defines a purpose that is relevant to audience, genre or discipline. Information may lack some clear references or citations. Defines a purpose that is unclear, unethical, inappropriate or not supported by evidence. Information presented lacks appropriate references or citations. The artifact does not include any identifiable purpose. Average Score:

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION A Publication of the Accrediting Commission For Community and Junior Colleges Western Association of Schools and Colleges For use in

More information

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups Appendix F Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups Demographic Survey--Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Discussion Group Demographic Survey Faculty with Disabilities Discussion Group Demographic Survey

More information

Shelters Elementary School

Shelters Elementary School Shelters Elementary School August 2, 24 Dear Parents and Community Members: We are pleased to present you with the (AER) which provides key information on the 23-24 educational progress for the Shelters

More information

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012) Program: Journalism Minor Department: Communication Studies Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20 Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012) Period of reference

More information

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist and Bethany L. McCaffrey, Ph.D., Interim Director of Research and Evaluation Evaluation

More information

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Data Diskette & CD ROM Data File Format Data Diskette & CD ROM Texas Assessment of Academic Skills Fall 2002 through Summer 2003 Exit Level Test Administrations Attention Macintosh Users To accommodate Macintosh systems a delimiter

More information

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing) Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal 2016-2017 Date Submitted: March 14, 2016 Check One: New Proposal: Continuing Project: X Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing) Control # 87-413 - EOPS

More information

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs) Standard 1 STANDARD 1: DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A SHARED VISION Education leaders facilitate the development and implementation of a shared vision of learning and growth of all students. Element

More information

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY CALIFORNIA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY, POMONA Landscape Architecture College of Environmental Design PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY Landscape Architecture Accreditation Board (LAAB) accredited programs are

More information

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT PROGRAM: Sociology SUBMITTED BY: Janine DeWitt DATE: August 2016 BRIEFLY DESCRIBE WHERE AND HOW ARE DATA AND DOCUMENTS USED TO GENERATE THIS REPORT BEING STORED: The

More information

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report The College Student Report This is a facsimile of the NSSE survey (available at nsse.iub.edu/links/surveys). The survey itself is administered online. 1. During the current school year, about how often

More information

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES Section 8: General Education Title: General Education Assessment Guidelines Number (Current Format) Number (Prior Format) Date Last Revised 8.7 XIV 09/2017 Reference: BOR Policy

More information

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine The figures and tables below are based upon the latest publicly available data from AAMC, NSF, Department of Education and the US Census Bureau.

More information

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION Focus on Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL ACCREDITING COMMISSION FOR SCHOOLS, WESTERN ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES www.acswasc.org 10/10/12 2013 WASC EDITION Focus on Learning THE ACCREDITATION

More information

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011) Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011) Health professions education programs - Conceptual framework The University of Rochester interdisciplinary program in Health Professions

More information

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity 5 Programmatic Equity It is one thing to take as a given that approximately 70 percent of an entering high school freshman class will not attend college, but to assign a particular child to a curriculum

More information

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors) Institutional Research and Assessment Data Glossary This document is a collection of terms and variable definitions commonly used in the universities reports. The definitions were compiled from various

More information

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH RESEARCH BRIEF #882 August 2015 STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation By Daniel Berumen, MPA Introduction The current report summarizes the results of the research activities

More information

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey Data from all participating institutions are aggregated for the comparative studies by various types of institutional characteristics. For that purpose,

More information

Assessment of Student Academic Achievement

Assessment of Student Academic Achievement Assessment of Student Academic Achievement 13 Chapter Parkland s commitment to the assessment of student academic achievement and its documentation is reflected in the college s mission statement; it also

More information

eportfolio Assessment of General Education

eportfolio Assessment of General Education eportfolio Assessment of General Education Pages from the eportfolios of Matthew Potts and Adam Eli Spikell. Used with Permission. Table of Contents Section Page Methods 2 Results--Quantitative Literacy

More information

Transportation Equity Analysis

Transportation Equity Analysis 2015-16 Transportation Equity Analysis Each year the Seattle Public Schools updates the Transportation Service Standards and bus walk zone boundaries for use in the upcoming school year. For the 2014-15

More information

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT Aimee A. Kirsch Akron Public Schools Akron, Ohio akirsch@akron.k12.oh.us Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative November 3, 2006 1 Introductions Akron Public

More information

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10 Success - Key Measures Graduation Rate: 4-, 5-, and 6-Year 9. First-time, full-time entering, degree-seeking, students enrolled in a minimum of 12 SCH their first fall semester who have graduated from

More information

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL Overview of the Doctor of Philosophy Board The Doctor of Philosophy Board (DPB) is a standing committee of the Johns Hopkins University that reports

More information

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators DPAS-II Guide for Administrators (Assistant Principals) Guide for Evaluating Assistant Principals Revised August

More information

Learning Objectives by Course Matrix Objectives Course # Course Name Psyc Know ledge

Learning Objectives by Course Matrix Objectives Course # Course Name Psyc Know ledge APPENDICES Learning Objectives by Course Matrix Objectives Course # Course Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Psyc Know ledge Integration across domains Psyc as Science Critical Thinking Diversity Ethics Applying

More information

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

Early Warning System Implementation Guide Linking Research and Resources for Better High Schools betterhighschools.org September 2010 Early Warning System Implementation Guide For use with the National High School Center s Early Warning System

More information

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results Introduction The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) is administered by hundreds of colleges and universities every year (560 in 2016), and is designed to measure the amount of time and effort

More information

Short Term Action Plan (STAP)

Short Term Action Plan (STAP) Short Term Action Plan (STAP) 10/14/2017 1 Managing Complex Change Vision Skills Incentives Resources Action Plan Assessment Meaningful Change Skills Incentives Resources Action Plan Assessment Confusion

More information

https://secure.aacte.org/apps/peds/print_all_forms.php?view=report&prin...

https://secure.aacte.org/apps/peds/print_all_forms.php?view=report&prin... 1 of 35 4/25/2012 9:56 AM A» 2011 PEDS» Institutional Data inst id: 3510 Institutional Data A_1 Institutional Information This information will be used in all official references to your institution. Institution

More information

Revision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience

Revision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience Revision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience Revision of Core Program In 2009 a Core Curriculum Task Force with representatives from every academic division was appointed by

More information

ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE

ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE March 28, 2002 Prepared by the Writing Intensive General Education Category Course Instructor Group Table of Contents Section Page

More information

Improvement of Writing Across the Curriculum: Full Report. Administered Spring 2014

Improvement of Writing Across the Curriculum: Full Report. Administered Spring 2014 Improvement of Writing Across the Curriculum: Full Report Administered Spring 2014 Rick O Bryan, Ronald E. Severtis, Jr., and Tanlee Wasson July 2014 Office of Institutional Effectiveness (OIE) Page 1

More information

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION Arizona Department of Education Tom Horne, Superintendent of Public Instruction STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 5 REVISED EDITION Arizona Department of Education School Effectiveness Division

More information

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars Iowa School District Profiles Overview This profile describes enrollment trends, student performance, income levels, population, and other characteristics of the public school district. The report utilizes

More information

University of Arizona

University of Arizona Annual Report Submission View Questionnaire (Edit) University of Arizona Annual Report Submission for the year 2009. Report has been submitted 1 times. Report was last submitted on 11/30/2009 7:12:09 PM.

More information

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report Frank Phillips College Accountability Report January 2016 Accountability System, January 2016 1 of 22 Participation - Key Measures Enrollment 1. Fall Headcount (Unduplicated) Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Fall 2015

More information

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) 2008 H. Craig Petersen Director, Analysis, Assessment, and Accreditation Utah State University Logan, Utah AUGUST, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary...1

More information

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution. UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution. Began admitting upperclassmen in 1975 and began admitting underclassmen in 1990. 1 A

More information

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for School: District: Kenai Peninsula Grades: K - 12 School Enrollment: 20 Title I School? No Title 1 Program: Accreditation: Report Card for 2008-2009 A Title 1 school receives federal money in support low-achieving

More information

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary National Survey of Student Engagement Spring 2010 University of Kansas Executive Summary Overview One thousand six hundred and twenty-one (1,621) students from the University of Kansas completed the web-based

More information

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS Arizona s English Language Arts Standards 11-12th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS 11 th -12 th Grade Overview Arizona s English Language Arts Standards work together

More information

Raw Data Files Instructions

Raw Data Files Instructions Raw Data Files Instructions Colleges will report the above information for students in the Main Cohort for each of the reporting timeframes and the system will calculate the sub cohorts and metrics based

More information

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School LIVONIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS http://cooper.livoniapublicschools.org 215-216 Annual Education Report BOARD OF EDUCATION 215-16 Colleen Burton, President Dianne Laura, Vice President Tammy Bonifield, Secretary

More information

BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:

BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT: National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT: CARNEGIE PEER INSTITUTIONS, 2003-2011 PREPARED BY: ANGEL A. SANCHEZ, DIRECTOR KELLI PAYNE, ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST/ SPECIALIST

More information

An Introduction to LEAP

An Introduction to LEAP An Introduction to LEAP Liberal Education America s Promise Excellence for Everyone as a Nation Goes to College An Introduction to LEAP About LEAP Liberal Education and America s Promise (LEAP) is a national

More information

Evaluation of Teach For America:

Evaluation of Teach For America: EA15-536-2 Evaluation of Teach For America: 2014-2015 Department of Evaluation and Assessment Mike Miles Superintendent of Schools This page is intentionally left blank. ii Evaluation of Teach For America:

More information

12-month Enrollment

12-month Enrollment 12-month Enrollment 2016-17 Institution: Potomac State College of West Virginia University (237701) Overview 12-month Enrollment Overview The 12-Month Enrollment component collects unduplicated student

More information

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel Presentation to the 82 nd Annual Virginia Middle and High School Principals Conference and Exposition Mrs. Patty S. Pitts Assistant Superintendent of

More information

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability August 2012 Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability Linking Measures of Academic Progress in Mathematics and Maryland School Assessment in Mathematics Huafang Zhao, Ph.D. This brief

More information

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016 KPI SUMMARY REPORT Assessment for Student Learning: -level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016 BACKGROUND Assessment for Student Learning is a key performance indicator aligned to the

More information

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment 29-21 Strategic Plan Dashboard Results Office of Institutional Research and Assessment Binghamton University Office of Institutional Research and Assessment Definitions Fall Undergraduate and Graduate

More information

What Is The National Survey Of Student Engagement (NSSE)?

What Is The National Survey Of Student Engagement (NSSE)? National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2000 Results for Montclair State University What Is The National Survey Of Student Engagement (NSSE)? US News and World Reports Best College Survey is due next

More information

VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status

VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status University of Baltimore VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status Approved by University Faculty Senate 2/11/09 Approved by Attorney General s Office 2/12/09 Approved by Provost 2/24/09

More information

Graduate Program in Education

Graduate Program in Education SPECIAL EDUCATION THESIS/PROJECT AND SEMINAR (EDME 531-01) SPRING / 2015 Professor: Janet DeRosa, D.Ed. Course Dates: January 11 to May 9, 2015 Phone: 717-258-5389 (home) Office hours: Tuesday evenings

More information

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis FYE Program at Marquette University Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis Writing Conventions INTEGRATING SOURCE MATERIAL 3 Proficient Outcome Effectively expresses purpose in the introduction

More information

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12) PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12) Standard I.* Standard II.* Standard III.* Standard IV. The teacher designs instruction appropriate for all students that reflects an understanding

More information

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance Kansas State Department of Education Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance Based on Elementary & Secondary Education Act, No Child Left Behind (P.L. 107-110) Revised May 2010 Revised May

More information

Comprehensive Program Review Report (Narrative) College of the Sequoias

Comprehensive Program Review Report (Narrative) College of the Sequoias Program Review - Child Development Comprehensive Program Review Report (Narrative) College of the Sequoias Program Review - Child Development Prepared by: San Dee Hodges, Rebecca Griffith, Gwenette Aytman

More information

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs Mapped to 2008 NSSE Survey Questions First Edition, June 2008 Introduction and Rationale for Using NSSE in ABET Accreditation One of the most common

More information

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Program: Special Education

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Program: Special Education George Mason University Graduate School of Education Program: Special Education 1 EDSE 590: Research Methods in Special Education Instructor: Margo A. Mastropieri, Ph.D. Assistant: Judy Ericksen Section

More information

State Parental Involvement Plan

State Parental Involvement Plan A Toolkit for Title I Parental Involvement Section 3 Tools Page 41 Tool 3.1: State Parental Involvement Plan Description This tool serves as an example of one SEA s plan for supporting LEAs and schools

More information

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program Sarah Garner University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 Michael J. Tremmel University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 Sarah

More information

Fostering Equity and Student Success in Higher Education

Fostering Equity and Student Success in Higher Education Fostering Equity and Student Success in Higher Education Laura I Rendón Professor Emerita University of Texas-San Antonio Presentation at NTCC 22 nd Annual Fall Leadership Conference Gainsesville, TX September

More information

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent Annual Report to the Public Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent 1 Conway Board of Education Ms. Susan McNabb Mr. Bill Clements Mr. Chuck Shipp Mr. Carl Barger Dr. Adam Lamey Dr. Quentin Washispack Mr. Andre

More information

ACBSP Related Standards: #3 Student and Stakeholder Focus #4 Measurement and Analysis of Student Learning and Performance

ACBSP Related Standards: #3 Student and Stakeholder Focus #4 Measurement and Analysis of Student Learning and Performance Graduate Business Student Course Evaluations Baselines July 12, 2011 W. Kleintop Process: Student Course Evaluations ACBSP Related Standards: #3 Student and Stakeholder Focus #4 Measurement and Analysis

More information

Educational Attainment

Educational Attainment A Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile of Allen County, Indiana based on the 2010 Census and the American Community Survey Educational Attainment A Review of Census Data Related to the Educational Attainment

More information

(Includes a Detailed Analysis of Responses to Overall Satisfaction and Quality of Academic Advising Items) By Steve Chatman

(Includes a Detailed Analysis of Responses to Overall Satisfaction and Quality of Academic Advising Items) By Steve Chatman Report #202-1/01 Using Item Correlation With Global Satisfaction Within Academic Division to Reduce Questionnaire Length and to Raise the Value of Results An Analysis of Results from the 1996 UC Survey

More information

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION The Coalition for Asian American Children and Families (CACF) is

More information

eportfolio Guide Missouri State University

eportfolio Guide Missouri State University Social Studies eportfolio Guide Missouri State University Updated February 2014 Missouri State Portfolio Guide MoSPE & Conceptual Framework Standards QUALITY INDICATORS MoSPE 1: Content Knowledge Aligned

More information

The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-

The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16- 1. Adoption of Wright State 2016 Campus Completion Plan The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16- WHEREAS, Section 3345.81 of the Ohio Revised Code requires

More information

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE Michal Kurlaender University of California, Davis Policy Analysis for California Education March 16, 2012 This research

More information

Guidelines for Project I Delivery and Assessment Department of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering Lebanese American University

Guidelines for Project I Delivery and Assessment Department of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering Lebanese American University Guidelines for Project I Delivery and Assessment Department of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering Lebanese American University Approved: July 6, 2009 Amended: July 28, 2009 Amended: October 30, 2009

More information

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior : Sophomore Junior Senior 2714 W Augusta Phone: 773.534.9718 Fax: 773.534.4022 Email: admissions@chiarts.org Web: www.chiarts.org CPS Mail Run: G.S.R. #35 FRESHMAN APPLICATION STEPS Thank you for your

More information

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition Georgia Department of Education September 2015 All Rights Reserved Achievement Levels and Achievement Level Descriptors With the implementation

More information

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan Signature Page Los Angeles Community College Los Angeles City College President, Board of Trustees Date District Chancellor: College President: Academic Senate

More information

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT 84341-5600 Document Generated On June 13, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Standard 1: Purpose and Direction 2 Standard 2: Governance

More information

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier. Adolescence and Young Adulthood SOCIAL STUDIES HISTORY For retake candidates who began the Certification process in 2013-14 and earlier. Part 1 provides you with the tools to understand and interpret your

More information

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7 Table of Contents Section Page Internship Requirements 3 4 Internship Checklist 5 Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6 Student Agreement Form 7 Consent to Release Records Form 8 Internship

More information

Saint Louis University Program Assessment Plan. Program Learning Outcomes Curriculum Mapping Assessment Methods Use of Assessment Data

Saint Louis University Program Assessment Plan. Program Learning Outcomes Curriculum Mapping Assessment Methods Use of Assessment Data Saint Louis University Program Assessment Plan Program (Major, Minor, Core): Sociology Department: Anthropology & Sociology College/School: College of Arts & Sciences Person(s) Responsible for Implementing

More information

MIDTERM REPORT. Solano Community College 4000 Suisun Valley Road Fairfield, California

MIDTERM REPORT. Solano Community College 4000 Suisun Valley Road Fairfield, California MIDTERM REPORT Solano Community College 4000 Suisun Valley Road Fairfield, California 94534-3197 Submitted to the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges Western Association of Schools

More information

GERMAN STUDIES (GRMN)

GERMAN STUDIES (GRMN) Bucknell University 1 GERMAN STUDIES (GRMN) Faculty Professors: Katherine M. Faull, Peter Keitel (Director) Associate Professors: Bastian Heinsohn, Helen G. Morris-Keitel (Chair) German Studies provides

More information

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) To be submitted to the U.S. Department of Education in September 2017 IMPORTANT NOTE: This is an early draft prepared for

More information

Purpose of internal assessment. Guidance and authenticity. Internal assessment. Assessment

Purpose of internal assessment. Guidance and authenticity. Internal assessment. Assessment Assessment Internal assessment Purpose of internal assessment Internal assessment is an integral part of the course and is compulsory for both SL and HL students. It enables students to demonstrate the

More information

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING With Specialist Frameworks for Other Professionals To be used for the pilot of the Other Professional Growth and Effectiveness System ONLY! School Library Media Specialists

More information

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3 Course Description: The fundamental piece to learning, thinking, communicating, and reflecting is language. Language A seeks to further develop six key skill areas: listening, speaking, reading, writing,

More information

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan, Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan, 2005-2010 Mission: Volunteer State Community College is a public, comprehensive community college offering associate degrees, certificates, continuing

More information

School Size and the Quality of Teaching and Learning

School Size and the Quality of Teaching and Learning School Size and the Quality of Teaching and Learning An Analysis of Relationships between School Size and Assessments of Factors Related to the Quality of Teaching and Learning in Primary Schools Undertaken

More information

Getting Started in Developing the Portfolio

Getting Started in Developing the Portfolio Doctoral Port Doctor of Philosophy in Health Education Program School of Population Health College of Health and Human Services University of Toledo December 06 Doc toral Port The use of a port to docume

More information

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001 Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps Cambridge, MA Lexington, MA Hadley, MA Bethesda, MD Washington, DC Chicago, IL Cairo, Egypt Johannesburg, South Africa A Profile of AmeriCorps

More information

University of Toronto

University of Toronto University of Toronto OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT AND PROVOST Governance and Administration of Extra-Departmental Units Interdisciplinarity Committee Working Group Report Following approval by Governing

More information

Segmentation Study of Tulsa Area Higher Education Needs Ages 36+ March Prepared for: Conducted by:

Segmentation Study of Tulsa Area Higher Education Needs Ages 36+ March Prepared for: Conducted by: Segmentation Study of Tulsa Area Higher Education Needs Ages 36+ March 2004 * * * Prepared for: Tulsa Community College Tulsa, OK * * * Conducted by: Render, vanderslice & Associates Tulsa, Oklahoma Project

More information

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School LIVONIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS www.livoniapublicschools.org/cooper 213-214 BOARD OF EDUCATION 213-14 Mark Johnson, President Colleen Burton, Vice President Dianne Laura, Secretary Tammy Bonifield, Trustee Dan

More information

FIGURE IT OUT! MIDDLE SCHOOL TASKS. Texas Performance Standards Project

FIGURE IT OUT! MIDDLE SCHOOL TASKS. Texas Performance Standards Project FIGURE IT OUT! MIDDLE SCHOOL TASKS π 3 cot(πx) a + b = c sinθ MATHEMATICS 8 GRADE 8 This guide links the Figure It Out! unit to the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) for eighth graders. Figure

More information

Colorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans

Colorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans Colorado State University Department of Construction Management Assessment Results and Action Plans Updated: Spring 2015 Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 List of Tables... 3 Table of Figures...

More information

Field Experience Management 2011 Training Guides

Field Experience Management 2011 Training Guides Field Experience Management 2011 Training Guides Page 1 of 40 Contents Introduction... 3 Helpful Resources Available on the LiveText Conference Visitors Pass... 3 Overview... 5 Development Model for FEM...

More information

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY KENT STATE UNIVERSITY Regents STARTALK Teacher Leadership Academy: Chinese, Russian Director: Brian J. Baer / Co-director: Theresa A. Minick Program Dates: Thursday, July 7 - Saturday, July 16 Summer 2016

More information

EQuIP Review Feedback

EQuIP Review Feedback EQuIP Review Feedback Lesson/Unit Name: On the Rainy River and The Red Convertible (Module 4, Unit 1) Content Area: English language arts Grade Level: 11 Dimension I Alignment to the Depth of the CCSS

More information

Khairul Hisyam Kamarudin, PhD 22 Feb 2017 / UTM Kuala Lumpur

Khairul Hisyam Kamarudin, PhD 22 Feb 2017 / UTM Kuala Lumpur Khairul Hisyam Kamarudin, PhD 22 Feb 2017 / UTM Kuala Lumpur DISCLAIMER: What is literature review? Why literature review? Common misconception on literature review Producing a good literature review Scholarly

More information