United Way of Lancaster County Collective Impact Initiative. Year Two Evaluation Report
|
|
- Regina Cole
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 United Way of Lancaster County Collective Impact Initiative August 2017
2 Table of Contents Executive Summary... 1 Overall Evaluation Processes from Year Two Collaboration with CI Directors... 3 Evaluation Tools... 3 Logic Model Refinement... 3 Data Collection Plan Design... 4 Presentation at Cohort Meeting... 5 Technical Assistance... 5 Collaborative Assessment Tool... 5 End-of-Year Evaluation Reporting... 6 Evaluation Outcomes Community Indicators Update... 7 Education... 8 Finance... 8 Health... 8 Collaborative Assessment Tool... 9 Breakdown of Results by Section: Changes from Fall to Spring... 9 Mutually Reinforcing Activities... 9 Continuous Communication Common Agenda Backbone Organization Network Analysis Appendices Appendix A: Community Indicators Update: Expanded Results... A1 Collaborative Assessment Tool: Expanded Results... A3
3 Executive Summary The at Franklin & Marshall College serves as external evaluator for the United Way of Lancaster County s Collective Impact (CI) initiative. During the second year of CI activities, the evaluation team continued to work closely with the CI Directors to refine and use the evaluation methodology to monitor impact. The evaluation team provided the following services during the second year of CI evaluation: Regular, ongoing collaboration with CI Directors for macro-level and partnership-level planning, monitoring, and evaluation Implementation and refinement of evaluation tools, including logic models, collaborative assessment surveys, evaluation dashboard, end-of-year evaluation reporting, and community indicators data Development of data collection plans for each partnership Logic model design and monitoring for each individual partnership Distribution and analysis of the fall and spring collaborative assessment survey Presentations at cohort meetings on evaluation topics Technical assistance, when requested and deemed appropriate, to individual partnerships on topics including survey design and self-sufficiency matrix training Ratings and recommendations delivered to CI Directors after review of each partnership s end-of-year reporting A few of the overall findings from the evaluation activities include: Based on results of the collaborative assessment tool at the end of year two, partnerships reported more positive ratings on all four main CI constructs measured: mutually reinforcing activities, continuous communication, common agenda, and support from backbone organization. Analysis of network connections, as reported in the collaborative assessment survey, reveals that the connectivity of community organizations within the CI framework has improved greatly during the first two years of CI work. Collective Impact outcomes and highlights: Bold Goal # 1 kindergarten readiness SAIL After receiving SAIL services, home-based child care providers increased their FCCERS scores an average of 2-3 points, making the average composite score a 5.05 (out of 7), which translates to a STAR 2 or STAR 3 childcare facility. FCCERS stands for Family Child Care Environmental Rating Scale and is used to assess components of quality such as health and safety, age-appropriate learning activities, program structure, and family engagement. Increased quality predicts better school readiness outcomes for children. Pinwheel Partners 87% of children (162 out of 186) scored on-target or above on the standardized Ages and Stages assessment, translating into school readiness. 100% of families (56 out of 56) reported an increased knowledge of positive parenting after participating in a series of family workshops. Plant the Seed of Learning 9 out of 16 school districts (Cocalico, Ephrata, Conestoga Valley, Elanco, Lampeter-Strasburg, SDoL, Manheim Township, Pequea Valley, and Warwick) are facilitating parenting sessions with LGH/Penn Medicine or WellSpan and early learning professionals. 71% of families surveyed report increased purposeful play/interactions and reading (at least five times per day) with their child after attending PTSL sessions. 1
4 Bold Goal #2 post-secondary credential attainment Integration Services for New Americans reduced the wait time for ESL classes for Lancaster County refugees and immigrants from 31 days to 7 days; improved basic English proficiency (using National Reporting Systems Standards) from 55% to 61%. Impacting Generations -100% (27/27)of the teen parents served by Impacting Generations graduated from high school - and are now working to support the young parents towards post-secondary goals Together Initiative Network (TIN) TIN found that many of their clients need remedial interventions before they are ready to take the GED for example, if a client is reading on a third-grade level. There are also preliminary steps / goals that are being tracked which create a pathway to a post-secondary credential. Their numbers are small due to this intensive work one adult learner being served earned her GED and four adult learners have increased their preparedness (which is measured after every 50 hours of class time) to take the GED test. Pathways Out of Poverty - Three leaders in the Pathways Out of Poverty partnership have enrolled in post-secondary programs. Moving Forward - Sixteen survivors of domestic violence are actively pursuing education and/or employment, and three participants have earned a post-secondary credential. Bold Goal #3 poverty reduction Lancaster County Coalition to End Homelessness Twenty-two clients being served by the Lancaster County Coalition to End Homelessness have increased their earned income from program entry to exit. 97% (310/325) of individuals placed in permanent housing do not return to homelessness within the next seven months. Elizabethtown Area HUB working to connect social service providers in the Elizabethtown area. 46 out of 50 agencies are now collaborating to provide streamlined services to residents. ECHOS (Elizabethtown Community Homelessness Outreach Services) is a direct result of the Etown HUB identifying and collaborating to meet a community need. Collective Impact the collective impact model that proved that framework under which United Way Partnerships must work has been identified as the best practice guiding the work of the Coalition to Combat Poverty. Bold Goal #4 connection to a medical home Let s Talk Lancaster improving access and treatment for behavioral health care needs, especially for low-income and minority residents As a result of this Partnership s efforts to increase early, consistent, and standardized screenings for depression, 113 medical professionals (LGH, Welsh Mountain, Water Street Ministries, and South East Lancaster Health Services) have been trained and are using the PHQ-9 (The PHQ-9 is a multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring, and measuring the severity of depression). The result is earlier detection and referral to treatment. 211 has been an instrumental part of Let s Talk, Lancaster s efforts around increasing access to mental health services by ensuring comprehensive and complete referral information for behavioral health providers. Lancaster Medical Legal Partnership advancing the financial stability and health of Lancaster County by integrating civil legal aid and financial case management with an intensive, high-utilization health care treatment model The Lancaster Medical Legal Partnership reports that, for reporting year 7/1/16 to 3/31/17, after individuals received services from LMLP, the number Emergency Room visits and inpatient utilization dropped from 602 to 350. This resulted in a cost-savings of over $46,000,000. The first section of this report describes the evaluation activities undertaken in year two of the CI initiative. The second section of this report describes the results and findings from these various evaluation activities. 2
5 1) Collaboration with CI Directors Overall Evaluation Processes from Year Two The evaluation team worked with the CI Directors to develop a process for monitoring partnership activities, and our meeting structures and evaluation activities reflected this development. The evaluation team and CI Directors met in person on a monthly basis. The meetings followed an agenda which allowed for partnership updates, planning for upcoming cohort meetings, discussing outcomes and data measurement, and any other items as needed. Monthly meetings were supplemented by individual phone calls between the applicable CI Director and the evaluation team, as needed, to debrief on recently held individual partnership meetings. In addition, the team and CI Directors used a secure Google drive to easily share files and collaborate between meetings. 2) Evaluation Tools Below is a list of the primary tools used for evaluation. Logic Model: See Section 3 Data Collection Plan: See Section 4 Collaborative Assessment Tool: See Section 7 Dashboard: In year one, the evaluation team collaborated with the CI Directors to develop a dashboard to rate the attributes that best define a successful, synergistic, and thriving partnership. This dashboard was further refined in year two to reflect the attributes expected to be achieved during the second year, including progress toward measuring and achieving short-term outcomes. Dashboard ratings were based on conversations among CI Directors, the evaluation team, and partnership self-evaluation. End-of-Year Reporting: See Section 8 Community Indicators: The evaluation team compiled County-level data on the major indicators related to the Bold Goals. Data are provided in the results section of this report. 3) Logic Model Refinement The evaluation team had individual, 90-minute meetings with each partnership and their CI Director in July and August The purpose of the meetings was to discuss the progress made and to adapt the logic model as needed based on their learnings from year one. The evaluation team led the discussion using the following set of questions: For year two and moving forward, will your Anticipated Impacts remain the same, or have they changed? Has your Target Population stayed the same, or has it changed? We are going to discuss the action steps from your original logic model, including whether they have been completed and how to build on the momentum and continue the work into year two. o Review each Activity Has the activity been successfully completed (or is it an ongoing activity)? If no, what barriers have prevented successful completion? Does the activity s completion (or revision) relate to any other parts of the logic model? If so, what are those changes? Do any new activities need to be added? o Review each Output Do any outputs need to be revised, added, and/or removed? o Review each Short-Term Outcome Do any outcomes need to be revised, added, and/or removed? Will each outcome be measurable? If so, will data be available THIS YEAR? 3
6 o What must happen next to move toward the desired outcomes? (Add to the model) Summarize the direction and focus for year two as realized by revised logic model At the end of the meeting, the partnership established their year two priorities and activities in the context of their logic model discussion. Following the meeting, the evaluation team delivered the refined logic model to each group, via the CI Director, with the understanding that the partnership would adapt it as needed during the second year. 4) Data Collection Plan Design Beginning in August 2016, the evaluation team consulted with each partnership via their CI Director to develop a data collection plan. This entailed the partnerships identifying the following items for each of their short-term outcomes: the measurement tool used (e.g., standardized Kindergarten screener), the collection method (e.g., institutional data from school districts), the collection schedule (e.g., annually in the fall), and the person(s) responsible for collecting the data. Once the data collection plan was reviewed and finalized by the evaluation team, partnerships were charged with using their plan to collect and report data for year two. Figure 1 below shows the instructional template given to partnerships to use in creating their data collection plans. Figure 1. Data Collection Plan Template and Instructions 4
7 5) Presentation at Cohort Meeting On September 14, 2016, the evaluation team presented to the cohorts an overview of the findings from the first year of CI evaluation activities, with a focus on the collaborative mapping and community indicators. 6) Technical Assistance The evaluation team was invited to provide technical assistance when deemed appropriate by the CI Directors. The following list highlights these activities. Within the CaseWorthy information system being piloted by many CI partnerships is the self-sufficiency matrix, a tool which allows the tracking of individual level needs, goals, and progress. The evaluation team provided technical assistance to the United Way and Community Action Partnership by collaborating on the development of a training manual. The training manual is intended for providers administering the selfsufficiency matrix to their clients, and includes a script questionnaire to guide the provider through the process of collecting and tracking client outcomes in a standardized manner. The evaluation team helped develop a questionnaire for Pathways out of Poverty to measure the relationship between Leaders and their mentors. The team helped design a questionnaire to measure SAIL participants trust of providers. The team programmed the survey in the online platform, Qualtrics, which allowed the team to house and output the data for the partnership to use. The team helped refine a questionnaire to measure behavior change among Plant the Seed of Learning workshop participants; this survey was programmed in Qualtrics, and data was then output for the partnership to use. 7) Collaborative Assessment Tool In October 2016 and April 2017, the evaluation team administered an online survey of members of all CI partnerships. The purpose of this survey was to gather information directly from individuals, in a confidential context, related to the four key elements of collective impact: common agenda, mutually reinforcing activities, continuous communication, and backbone organization support. After the spring survey, the evaluation team delivered and discussed changes at the partnership level from fall to spring. After each survey, the evaluation team summarized results overall and at the partnership level, and delivered these results to the CI Directors. In addition, the team delivered a network map that displayed the connections between organizations in the spring. The figures display the connections between the partnership organizations based on results from the survey question: Which other organization(s) in your partnership do you go to for help and advice as you work on this project? 5
8 8) End-of-Year Evaluation Reporting In collaboration with the CI Directors, the evaluation team developed a framework for each partnership to provide their end-of-year reporting. The framework was delivered from the CI Directors to each partnership. The framework was: Logic Model/Data Collection Plan Due March 31, 2017 Provide current data collection plan, adding columns to report annual performance data o Baseline data, at a minimum, should be reported. Use the column titled Reporting Period 1 Baseline and fill in the period you are reporting on (e.g., Jan 1 Dec 31, 2015) o Additional data beyond baseline should be reported, if available Use the column titled Reporting Period 2 and fill in the period you are reporting on (e.g., Jan 1 Dec 31, 2016) Accountability Report Due April 21, 2017 One to two page narrative that covers the following: o Did we implement our work as planned and authorized? Describe your progress toward achieving the specific Bold Goals you proposed. Speak to your partnerships inputs, activities, processes, outputs, and quality standards you have used. o To what extent are we continuing to build strong, positive relationships with key stakeholders and partners? Speak to the ways partners are working together as a result of using the Collective Impact Model. o What were our major successes and challenges in year two? o What have we learned, and in what ways are we applying what we have learned to improve effectiveness? o To what extent and in what ways are we attaining desired and intended program outcomes and impacts? Speak to the short-term outcomes your partnership identified and what the data tells you about attaining these outcomes. o What plans do we have for year three? How will what we learned from the data impact our management, programming, and/or service delivery in year three? Budgetary summary and up-to-date compliance documents Due April 21, 2017 o Year two, quarter three budgetary summary o Year two, end-of-year projected budgetary summary o Year three proposed budget including remaining prior year funds o Current compliance documents: 501(c)3 determination letter W-9 Bureau of Charitable Organizations Certificate (if applicable) Financial audit and review Each partnership delivered their reporting via e-cimpact. The evaluation team reviewed all materials, summarized results, and assigned ratings for each partnership. The team then met with the CI Directors to discuss the results and assign final ratings to each partnership for the dashboard. A final summary was developed and then delivered to the CI Committee. 6
9 Evaluation Outcomes Community Indicators Update Trends in Selected Indicator Data for Lancaster County and Pennsylvania United Way and the evaluation team selected 12 indicators to assess changes in Lancaster County related to the United Way s Bold Goals. Table 1 and Figure 2 (below) show changes in these indicators since the start of the United Way CI initiative in The selected indicators fit into three categories: education, finance (economy), and health. Lancaster s rank among the 67 counties in the state is shown below each indicator in italics. Since 2014, Lancaster has made positive changes in rank in 3rd grade PSSA scores, monthly homeowner costs greater than 30% of income in units with a mortgage, poverty rates, and the ratio of dentists and mental health care providers. Lancaster s rank has declined in rates of children enrolled in high quality, publicallyfunded Pre-K, educational attainment, gross rent greater than 30% of income, poverty among children, uninsured individuals, and the ratio of primary care physicians. Table A-1 in Appendix A shows comparison data from Pennsylvania and Lancaster as well as Lancaster s rank among the 67 counties in the state. Table 1. Trends in Selected Indicators for United Way s Bold Goals and Impacts 7
10 Figure 2. Trends in Selected Indicators for United Way s Bold Goals and Impacts Percent of PA Counties Performing Better Education Lancaster has made positive changes to its relative ranking on 3 rd grade PSSA reading and math scores, and has gone down in ranking in every other education category. Note that although the math PSSA scores have declined in Lancaster County, math PSSA scores have also decreased statewide due to changes made in 2015 to the scoring of the PSSA. Educational attainment of individuals aged 25+ with a bachelor s degree or higher and rates of children enrolled in highquality publically-funded Pre-K have remained virtually static, but have gone down in ranking compared to other counties in the state. Finance Monthly costs exceeding 30% of household income for homeowners (with a mortgage) have gotten slightly better in Lancaster County, and although the poverty rate in Lancaster has improved in ranking compared to the rest of the state, the rates have gotten slightly worse. Gross rent greater than 30% of income and poverty among children have gotten worse in both rates and ranking in Lancaster County compared to the rest of the state. Health In Lancaster County, rates of uninsured individuals have slightly decreased since 2014, but is far behind the rest of the counties in the state virtually the worst performing county (ranked 64 out of 67 counties in PA). Rates of dentists and mental health care providers have slightly improved, while rates of primary care physicians have decreased since
11 Collaborative Assessment Tool The figures below show the results of the collaborative assessment tool, which was first administered in the fall of 2015, with subsequent assessments given in spring of 2016, fall of 2016, and in the spring of Significant differences between scores are noted with an asterisk. Table A-2 in Appendix A shows the mean scores for each question as well as the change from fall to spring. Breakdown of Results by Section Changes from Fall 2015 to Spring 2017 Mutually Reinforcing Activities This section shows the largest positive change from fall 2015 to spring 2017, specifically in areas such as clarity of strategies to carry out the goals and objectives of the partnership, systems for conflict resolution, the assignment of partner roles and responsibilities according to strengths, the flexibility of changing policies and regulations when necessary to increase the effectiveness of the partnership, and shared decision-making (Figure 3). Figure 3. Mutually Reinforcing Activities 9
12 Continuous Communication This section also shows the next largest positive change from fall 2015 to spring 2017, specifically in areas such as frequency of formal communication among partners and communication promoting cooperation among partners (Figure 4). Figure 4. Continuous Communication 10
13 Common Agenda The Common Agenda section showed virtually identical positive change as the previous section, specifically in areas such as members understanding the role of other members within the partnership as well as trust between partnerships and feelings of ownership in the operation of the partnership. The only negative change was in the view that members bring unique skills to address the partnership s needs (Figure 5). Figure 5. Common Agenda 11
14 Backbone Organization This section showed the smallest increase from fall 2015 to spring The most positive changes were in areas such as addressing conflicts when they arise, adequacy of in-kind support, the view that United Way is working to mobilize funding for the partnership, and the view that United Way establishes shared measurement practices for the partnership. Scores have decreased or remained virtually static in areas such as the view that United Way is responsive to the needs of the organization and the timeliness of communication with United Way (Figure 6). Figure 6. Backbone Organization 12
15 Network Analysis The initiative has been purposely designed to connect the resources and expertise of diverse community organizations to more effectively address community problems as identified by the four bold goals. This requires the development of an efficient network structure that facilitates communication and cooperation between organizations, ultimately creating a more effective and efficient way to reach their shared goals. The United Way CI process has significantly improved the connectivity of the community organizations within the network during its first two years. One of the most basic characteristics of any network is its density, which is the proportion of observed ties in a network to the maximum number of possible ties. High scores show a network that is more interconnected. The network density scores rose from.087 in fall 2015 to.154 in spring 2016 to.176 in spring 2017, which is a clear indication that the network of community organizations has grown more connections during the course of the year. Network centrality measures also indicate positive change. Centrality can be thought of as the position of a node (in this case each organization) within a network. Degree centrality represents the number of ties an organization has to the other organizations in the network. The average degree or number of ties of those organizations in the network rose from 17.5 (fall 2015) to 26.8 (spring 2016) to 30.9 (spring 2017). Another indicator of the network s changing inter-relationships can be seen in the number of relatively independent subgroups that exist within the network, which might be thought of as network communities. A network subgroup or community is described as a set of organizations that have more internal ties and fewer ties to other parts of the network. In fall 2015, we detected approximately 22 different communities based on their inter-relationships, indicating a relatively fragmented network. By spring 2016 we identified only 8 different network communities and by spring 2017 there were 7 different network communities. Figures 5 and 6 on the following pages display the connections between organizations participating in the United Way s Community Impact Initiative. Each organization is represented by a circle and each line represents a connection between organizations. The size of the circle indicates the number of close connections an organization has the larger the size, the more close connections the organization has. Network communities are identified by color and signify groups of organizations that are more frequently and closely connected to one another than they are to organizations in other parts of the network. Organizations that are more interconnected appear closer to the center of the figure and those that are less interconnected appear closer to the periphery. Data comes from the self-administered collaborative assessment survey of all community impact partners responding to the following question: Which other organization(s) in your partnership do you go to for help and advice as you work on this project? 13
16 Figure 7. Network Analysis, Fall
17 Figure 8. Network Analysis, Spring
18 Appendix A Appendix A Community Indicators Update Trends in Selected Indicator Data for Lancaster County and Pennsylvania United Way and the evaluation team selected 12 indicators to assess changes in Lancaster County related to the United Way s Bold Goals. The table below shows comparison data from Pennsylvania and Lancaster as well as Lancaster s rank among the 67 counties in the state. The selected indicators fit into three categories: education, finance (economy), and health. Lancaster s rank among the 67 counties in the state is shown on the far right of the table. Since 2014, Lancaster has made positive changes in rank in 3rd grade PSSA scores, selected monthly homeowner costs greater than 30% of income in units with a mortgage, poverty rates, and the ratio of dentists and mental health care providers. Lancaster has gone down in rank in rates of children enrolled in high quality, publically-funded Pre-K, educational attainment, gross rent greater than 30% of income, poverty among children, uninsured individuals, and the ratio of primary care physicians. 1
19 Appendix A Table A-1. Trends in Selected Indicators for United Way s Bold Goals and Impacts 2
20 Appendix A Collaborative Assessment Tool The tables below show the results of the collaborative assessment tool, which was first administered in the fall of 2015, with subsequent assessments given in spring of 2016, fall of 2016, and in the spring of Significant differences between scores are noted with an asterisk. The mean scores for each question as well as the change from fall to spring are shown in Table A-2. All but one item (5. Partnership members bring unique skills to address the partnership s needs) in all three sections (Common Agenda, Mutually Reinforcing Activities, Continuous Communication, and Backbone Organization) show positive changes from fall 2015 to spring The biggest improvements were made in the Mutually Reinforcing Activities section (mean total change=0.33) and the Common Agenda section (mean total change=0.26). The biggest improvements in individual items were 13. There is a system in place for resolving conflicts between the demands of partnering organizations and demands of this partnership (+0.64); 4. Partnership members understand the roles of all members (+0.49); and 11. Strategies to carry out the goals and objectives of this partnership are clear (+0.45). Table A-3 shows the percentage of responses in the 1-3 category (not at all, rarely, sometimes) and in the 4-5 category (often, always). 3
21 Appendix A Table A-2. Collaborative Assessment Tool Results, Mean Aggregate Changes 4
22 Appendix A Table A-3. Collaborative Assessment Tool Results 5
CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education
CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION Connecticut State Department of Education October 2017 Preface Connecticut s educators are committed to ensuring that students develop the skills and acquire
More informationSASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION
SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION Report March 2017 Report compiled by Insightrix Research Inc. 1 3223 Millar Ave. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan T: 1-866-888-5640 F: 1-306-384-5655 Table of Contents
More informationState Parental Involvement Plan
A Toolkit for Title I Parental Involvement Section 3 Tools Page 41 Tool 3.1: State Parental Involvement Plan Description This tool serves as an example of one SEA s plan for supporting LEAs and schools
More informationTitle II of WIOA- Adult Education and Family Literacy Activities 463 Guidance
Title II of WIOA- Adult Education and Family Literacy Activities 463 Guidance This narrative is intended to provide guidance to all parties interested in the Oklahoma AEFLA competition to be held in FY18
More informationGetting Results Continuous Improvement Plan
Page of 9 9/9/0 Department of Education Market Street Harrisburg, PA 76-0 Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan 0-0 Principal Name: Ms. Sharon Williams School Name: AGORA CYBER CS District Name:
More informationExecutive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY
Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY 40741-1222 Document Generated On January 13, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Description of the School System 2 System's Purpose 4 Notable
More informationGreat Teachers, Great Leaders: Developing a New Teaching Framework for CCSD. Updated January 9, 2013
Great Teachers, Great Leaders: Developing a New Teaching Framework for CCSD Updated January 9, 2013 Agenda Why Great Teaching Matters What Nevada s Evaluation Law Means for CCSD Developing a Teaching Framework
More informationIowa School District Profiles. Le Mars
Iowa School District Profiles Overview This profile describes enrollment trends, student performance, income levels, population, and other characteristics of the public school district. The report utilizes
More informationOFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIST Technical Diploma
OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIST Technical Diploma Program Code: 31-106-8 our graduates INDEMAND 2017/2018 mstc.edu administrative professional career pathway OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIST CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP PROFESSIONAL
More informationTEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS. Directive Teaching Quality Standard Applicable to the Provision of Basic Education in Alberta
Standards of Teaching Practice TEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS BASED ON: Policy, Regulations and Forms Manual Section 4 Ministerial Orders and Directives Directive 4.2.1 - Teaching Quality Standard Applicable
More informationSEN SUPPORT ACTION PLAN Page 1 of 13 Read Schools to include all settings where appropriate.
SEN SUPPORT ACTION PLAN -18 Page 1 of 13 Read Schools to include all settings where appropriate. The AIM of this action plan is that SEN children achieve their best possible outcomes. Target: to narrow
More informationTRI-STATE CONSORTIUM Wappingers CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
TRI-STATE CONSORTIUM Wappingers CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Consultancy Special Education: January 11-12, 2016 Table of Contents District Visit Information 3 Narrative 4 Thoughts in Response to the Questions
More informationK-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)
K-12 Academic Intervention Plan Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI) September 2016 June 2018 2016 2018 K 12 Academic Intervention Plan Table of Contents AIS Overview...Page
More informationVolunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,
Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan, 2005-2010 Mission: Volunteer State Community College is a public, comprehensive community college offering associate degrees, certificates, continuing
More informationEDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT By 2030, at least 60 percent of Texans ages 25 to 34 will have a postsecondary credential or degree. Target: Increase the percent of Texans ages 25 to 34 with a postsecondary credential.
More informationGlenn County Special Education Local Plan Area. SELPA Agreement
Page 1 of 10 Educational Mental Health Related Services, A Tiered Approach Draft Final March 21, 2012 Introduction Until 6-30-10, special education students with severe socio-emotional problems who did
More informationDelaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators
Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators DPAS-II Guide (Revised) for Teachers Updated August 2017 Table of Contents I. Introduction to DPAS II Purpose of
More informationCalifornia s Bold Reimagining of Adult Education. Meeting of the Minds September 6, 2017
California s Bold Reimagining of Adult Education Meeting of the Minds September 6, 2017 Adult Education in California Historically CDE State Run Program $750M (est) Ten Program Areas K12 Districts / County
More informationOFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report
2014-2015 OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT Annual Report Table of Contents 2014 2015 MESSAGE FROM THE VICE PROVOST A YEAR OF RECORDS 3 Undergraduate Enrollment 6 First-Year Students MOVING FORWARD THROUGH
More informationILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD
-6-525-2- HAZEL CREST SD 52-5 HAZEL CREST SD 52-5 HAZEL CREST, ILLINOIS and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each year. 2 7 ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD
More informationOccupational Therapist (Temporary Position)
Edmonton Catholic Schools is now accepting applications for the position of Occupational Therapist (Temporary Position) Edmonton Catholic Schools is a large urban school district whose mission is to provide
More informationILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD
-6-525-2- Hazel Crest SD 52-5 Hazel Crest SD 52-5 Hazel Crest, ILLINOIS 2 8 ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each year.
More informationColorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report
Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for 2015-16 Online UIP Report Organization Code: 2690 District Name: PUEBLO CITY 60 Official 2014 SPF: 1-Year Executive Summary How are students performing?
More informationTrends & Issues Report
Trends & Issues Report prepared by David Piercy & Marilyn Clotz Key Enrollment & Demographic Trends Options Identified by the Eight Focus Groups General Themes 4J Eugene School District 4J Eugene, Oregon
More informationBasic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs
Basic Skills Plus Legislation and Guidelines Hope Opportunity Jobs Page 2 of 7 Basic Skills Plus Legislation When the North Carolina General Assembly passed the 2010 budget bill, one of their legislative
More informationPUPIL PREMIUM REVIEW
PUPIL PREMIUM REVIEW 2015-2016 Pupil Premium Review 2015/2016 Ambition The school aims to provide pupils with a consistently good quality of provision for all pupils. We aim to maximise the progress of
More informationConnecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP
Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP About the National Council for Community and Education Partnerships (NCCEP) Our mission is to build the capacity of communities to ensure that underserved
More informationEarly Warning System Implementation Guide
Linking Research and Resources for Better High Schools betterhighschools.org September 2010 Early Warning System Implementation Guide For use with the National High School Center s Early Warning System
More informationState Budget Update February 2016
State Budget Update February 2016 2016-17 BUDGET TRAILER BILL SUMMARY The Budget Trailer Bill Language is the implementing statute needed to effectuate the proposals in the annual Budget Bill. The Governor
More informationBellehaven Elementary
Overall istrict: Albuquerque Public Schools Grade Range: KN-05 Code: 1229 School Grade Report Card 2013 Current Standing How did students perform in the most recent school year? are tested on how well
More informationMiami-Dade County Public Schools
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS AND THEIR ACADEMIC PROGRESS: 2010-2011 Author: Aleksandr Shneyderman, Ed.D. January 2012 Research Services Office of Assessment, Research, and Data Analysis 1450 NE Second Avenue,
More informationEducational Attainment
A Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile of Allen County, Indiana based on the 2010 Census and the American Community Survey Educational Attainment A Review of Census Data Related to the Educational Attainment
More informationTHE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS ELIZABETH ANNE SOMERS Spring 2011 A thesis submitted in partial
More informationBureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION A Framework for Continuous School Improvement Planning (Summer 2009) GETTING RESULTS Continuous School Improvement Plan Gen 6-2 Year Plan Required for Schools in School
More informationSpecial Educational Needs Policy (including Disability)
Special Educational Needs Policy (including Disability) To be reviewed annually Chair of Governors, Lyn Schlich Signed January 2017 East Preston Infant School SPECIAL EDUCATION NEEDS [SEN] POLICY CONTENTS
More informationLike much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.
36 37 POPULATION TRENDS Economy ECONOMY Like much of the country, suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession. Since bottoming out in the first quarter of 2010, however, the city has seen
More informationImplementing an Early Warning Intervention and Monitoring System to Keep Students On Track in the Middle Grades and High School
Implementing an Early Warning Intervention and Monitoring System to Keep Students On Track in the Middle Grades and High School National High School Center Facilitator: Joseph Harris, Ph.D. Presenters:
More informationPIAA DISTRICT III POWER RANKINGS
CLASS 6A GIRLS BASKETBALL Top 12 teams qualify for the 2016-2017 PIAA District III M&T Bank Class 6A Girls Basketball Championships 6A School W L T Rating TWP OWP 1 Cumberland Valley 17-1- 0 0.838316 0.965596
More informationEnvision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals
Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals Institutional Priority: Improve the front door experience Identify metrics appropriate to
More informationFor the Ohio Board of Regents Second Report on the Condition of Higher Education in Ohio
Facilities and Technology Infrastructure Report For the Ohio Board of Regents Second Report on the Condition of Higher Education in Ohio Introduction. As Ohio s national research university, Ohio State
More informationTACOMA HOUSING AUTHORITY
TACOMA HOUSING AUTHORITY CHILDREN s SAVINGS ACCOUNT for the CHILDREN of NEW SALISHAN, Tacoma, WA last revised July 10, 2014 1. SUMMARY The Tacoma Housing Authority (THA) plans to offer individual development
More informationTHE FIELD LEARNING PLAN
THE FIELD LEARNING PLAN School of Social Work - University of Pittsburgh FOUNDATION FIELD PLACEMENT Term: Fall Year: 2009 Student's Name: THE STUDENT Field Liaison: Name of Agency/Organization: Agency/Organization
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices. April 2017
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices April 2017 Prepared for the Nellie Mae Education Foundation by the UMass Donahue Institute 1
More informationBanner Financial Aid Release Guide. Release and June 2017
Banner Financial Aid Release Guide Release 8.29.1 and 9.3.3 June 2017 Notices Notices 2017 Ellucian. Contains confidential and proprietary information of Ellucian and its subsidiaries. Use of these materials
More informationSuggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for
MAINE Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for Research on Higher Education, Graduate School of Education,
More informationTestimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education
Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education October 3, 2017 Chairman Alexander, Senator Murray, members of the
More informationPower of Ten Leadership Academy Class Curriculum
Power of Ten Leadership Academy 2017-2018 Class Curriculum Dates marked with an asterisk (*) are tentative and subject to change Skills Lab Personal Effectiveness, Leadership, and Communications Friday,
More informationThe number of involuntary part-time workers,
University of New Hampshire Carsey School of Public Policy CARSEY RESEARCH National Issue Brief #116 Spring 2017 Involuntary Part-Time Employment A Slow and Uneven Economic Recovery Rebecca Glauber The
More informationAssessment. the international training and education center on hiv. Continued on page 4
the international training and education center on hiv I-TECH Approach to Curriculum Development: The ADDIE Framework Assessment I-TECH utilizes the ADDIE model of instructional design as the guiding framework
More informationA Framework for Safe and Successful Schools
A Framework for Safe and Successful Schools Kelly M. Vaillancourt, Ph.D, NCSP Sally A. Baas, Ed.D Click to edit subtitle style Click to edit subtitle style Click to edit subtitle style Click to edit subtitle
More informationMASTER S COURSES FASHION START-UP
MASTER S COURSES FASHION START-UP Postgraduate Programmes Master s Course Fashion Start-Up 02 Brief Descriptive Summary Over the past 80 years Istituto Marangoni has grown and developed alongside the thriving
More informationKahului Elementary School
Kahului Elementary Code: 405 Status and Improvement Report Year 2014-15 Focus On Standards Grades K-5 Focus on Standards Description Contents Setting Student Profile Community Profile Improvement Summary
More informationCHAPTER 4: REIMBURSEMENT STRATEGIES 24
CHAPTER 4: REIMBURSEMENT STRATEGIES 24 INTRODUCTION Once state level policymakers have decided to implement and pay for CSR, one issue they face is simply how to calculate the reimbursements to districts
More informationNavitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education February 2014 Annex: Birmingham City University International College Introduction
More informationPROPOSED MERGER - RESPONSE TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION
PROPOSED MERGER - RESPONSE TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION Paston Sixth Form College and City College Norwich Vision for the future of outstanding Post-16 Education in North East Norfolk Date of Issue: 22 September
More informationLegal Technicians: A Limited License to Practice Law Ellen Reed, King County Bar Association, Seattle, WA
Legal Technicians: A Limited License to Practice Law Ellen Reed, King County Bar Association, Seattle, WA Washington State recently approved licensing "Legal Technicians" to practice family law and several
More information1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview Section 11.515, Florida Statutes, was created by the 1996 Florida Legislature for the purpose of conducting performance reviews of school districts in Florida. The statute
More informationK5 Math Practice. Free Pilot Proposal Jan -Jun Boost Confidence Increase Scores Get Ahead. Studypad, Inc.
K5 Math Practice Boost Confidence Increase Scores Get Ahead Free Pilot Proposal Jan -Jun 2017 Studypad, Inc. 100 W El Camino Real, Ste 72 Mountain View, CA 94040 Table of Contents I. Splash Math Pilot
More informationMontana's Distance Learning Policy for Adult Basic and Literacy Education
Montana's Distance Learning Policy for Adult Basic and Literacy Education 2013-2014 1 Table of Contents I. Introduction Page 3 A. The Need B. Going to Scale II. Definitions and Requirements... Page 4-5
More informationImplementing Response to Intervention (RTI) National Center on Response to Intervention
Implementing (RTI) Session Agenda Introduction: What is implementation? Why is it important? (NCRTI) Stages of Implementation Considerations for implementing RTI Ineffective strategies Effective strategies
More informationPort Jefferson Union Free School District. Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN
Port Jefferson Union Free School District Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN 2016-2017 Approved by the Board of Education on August 16, 2016 TABLE of CONTENTS
More informationSTUDENT EXPERIENCE a focus group guide
STUDENT EXPERIENCE a focus group guide September 16, 2016 Overview Participation Thank you for agreeing to participate in an Energizing Eyes High focus group session. We have received research ethics approval
More informationSegmentation Study of Tulsa Area Higher Education Needs Ages 36+ March Prepared for: Conducted by:
Segmentation Study of Tulsa Area Higher Education Needs Ages 36+ March 2004 * * * Prepared for: Tulsa Community College Tulsa, OK * * * Conducted by: Render, vanderslice & Associates Tulsa, Oklahoma Project
More informationPREPARING FOR THE SITE VISIT IN YOUR FUTURE
PREPARING FOR THE SITE VISIT IN YOUR FUTURE ARC-PA Suzanne York SuzanneYork@arc-pa.org 2016 PAEA Education Forum Minneapolis, MN Saturday, October 15, 2016 TODAY S SESSION WILL INCLUDE: Recommendations
More informationSchool Action Plan: Template Overview
School Action Plan: Template Overview Directions: The School Action Plan template has several tabs. They include: Achievement Targets (Red Tab) Needs Assessment (Red Tab) Key Action 1-5 (Blue Tabs) Summary
More informationUpward Bound Program
SACS Preparation Division of Student Affairs Upward Bound Program REQUIREMENTS: The institution provides student support programs, services, and activities consistent with its mission that promote student
More informationYour Guide to. Whole-School REFORM PIVOT PLAN. Strengthening Schools, Families & Communities
Your Guide to Whole-School REFORM PIVOT PLAN Strengthening Schools, Families & Communities Why a Pivot Plan? In order to tailor our model of Whole-School Reform to recent changes seen at the federal level
More informationShelters Elementary School
Shelters Elementary School August 2, 24 Dear Parents and Community Members: We are pleased to present you with the (AER) which provides key information on the 23-24 educational progress for the Shelters
More informationStudent Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools
Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools Introduction The Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (ESE) calculates and reports mobility rates as part of its overall
More informationDanielle Dodge and Paula Barnick first
Co-Teaching ELLs: Riding a Tandem Bike Content-area teachers and ESL teachers can address the needs of English language learners with a collaborative instructional cycle that starts with co-planning. Andrea
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT Saint Paul Public Schools Independent School District # 625 360 Colborne Street Saint Paul MN 55102-3299 RFP Superintendent Search Consultant, St.
More informationNewburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan
Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic Academic Intervention Services Plan Revised September 2016 October 2015 Newburgh Enlarged City School District Elementary Academic Intervention Services
More informationExams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners
PSSA Accommodations Guidelines for English Language Learners (ELLs) [Arlen: Please format this page like the cover page for the PSSA Accommodations Guidelines for Students PSSA with IEPs and Students with
More informationThe Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016
The Condition of College and Career Readiness This report looks at the progress of the 16 ACT -tested graduating class relative to college and career readiness. This year s report shows that 64% of students
More informationStudent Learning Objectives Overview for New Districts
Student Learning Objectives Overview for New Districts Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Division 2013 2014 Welcome to the SLO Overview for New Districts Introductions Restrooms Parking Lot Please silence
More informationPersonal Tutoring at Staffordshire University
Personal Tutoring at Staffordshire University Staff Guidelines 1 Contents Introduction 3 Staff Development for Personal Tutors 3 Roles and responsibilities of personal tutors 3 Frequency of meetings 4
More informationMassachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Title I Comparability 2009-2010 Title I provides federal financial assistance to school districts to provide supplemental educational services
More informationCharter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity
School Reporting and Monitoring Activity All information and documents listed below are to be provided to the Schools Office by the date shown, unless another date is specified in pre-opening conditions
More informationAfrican American Male Achievement Update
Report from the Department of Research, Evaluation, and Assessment Number 8 January 16, 2009 African American Male Achievement Update AUTHOR: Hope E. White, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist Department
More informationComprehensive Progress Report
Brawley Middle Comprehensive Progress Report 9/30/2017 Mission: Our Vision, Mission, and Core Values Vision Brawley will aspire to be a top 10 middle school in North Carolina by inspiring innovative thinking,
More informationRegional Bureau for Education in Africa (BREDA)
United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization Regional Bureau for Education in Africa (BREDA) Regional Conference on Higher Education in Africa (CRESA) 10-13 November 2008 Preparatory
More informationSchool Performance Plan Middle Schools
SY 2012-2013 School Performance Plan Middle Schools 734 Middle ALternative Program @ Lombard, Principal Roger Shaw (Interim), Executive Director, Network Facilitator PLEASE REFER TO THE SCHOOL PERFORMANCE
More informationFieldwork Practice Manual- AHSC 435
CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY Fieldwork Practice Manual- AHSC 435 Department of Applied Human Sciences Updated February 2011 Contents Introduction... 3 Course Description... 3 Purpose... 3 Objectives... 3 Course
More informationEvaluation Off Off On On
CALIPSO Clinical Performance Evaluation Criteria Updated 8/2017 Below are the minimum areas anticipated to be evaluated by supervisors and students for each type of registration/practicum activity. If
More informationAppendix IX. Resume of Financial Aid Director. Professional Development Training
Appendix IX Resume of Financial Aid Director Professional Development Training ALBERT TEZENO 6815 Chapelfield Houston Texas 77049 Tezeno_aj@yahoo.com 281-459-4114 cell 832-642-6937 Director of Financial
More informationFRESNO COUNTY INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS) PLAN UPDATE
FRESNO COUNTY INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS) PLAN UPDATE DELIVERABLE NO. 1 PROJECT PLAN FRESNO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for Fresno Council of Governments 2035 Tulare Street, Suite 201 Fresno,
More informationIMPACTFUL, QUANTIFIABLE AND TRANSFORMATIONAL?
IMPACTFUL, QUANTIFIABLE AND TRANSFORMATIONAL? EVALUATION OF THE IMPROVING QUALITY TOGETHER (IQT) NATIONAL LEARNING PROGRAMME Report for 1000 Lives Improvement Service, Public Health Wales Mark Llewellyn,
More informationStatus of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine
Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine The figures and tables below are based upon the latest publicly available data from AAMC, NSF, Department of Education and the US Census Bureau.
More informationStrategic Plan Update Year 3 November 1, 2013
Georgia Network for Educational and Therapeutic Support (GNETS) Strategic Plan Update Year 3 November 1, 2013 Introduction The Georgia Network for Educational and Therapeutic Support (GNETS) is comprised
More informationA Diagnostic Tool for Taking your Program s Pulse
A Diagnostic Tool for Taking your Program s Pulse The questionnaire that follows is a print-friendly version of the Diagnostic Tool for self-evaluating English language programs in states, districts and
More informationSchool Inspection in Hesse/Germany
Hessisches Kultusministerium School Inspection in Hesse/Germany Contents 1. Introduction...2 2. School inspection as a Procedure for Quality Assurance and Quality Enhancement...2 3. The Hessian framework
More informationGovernors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act
Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act Summary In today s competitive global economy, our education system must prepare every student to be successful
More informationEffective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students
Critical Issues in Dental Education Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students Naty Lopez, Ph.D.; Rose Wadenya, D.M.D., M.S.;
More informationTools to SUPPORT IMPLEMENTATION OF a monitoring system for regularly scheduled series
RSS RSS Tools to SUPPORT IMPLEMENTATION OF a monitoring system for regularly scheduled series DEVELOPED BY the Accreditation council for continuing medical education December 2005; Updated JANUARY 2008
More informationREADY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE
READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE Michal Kurlaender University of California, Davis Policy Analysis for California Education March 16, 2012 This research
More informationPeninsula School. District Strategic Plan Dashboard. Slide 1.
Peninsula School District 2015 Strategic Plan Dashboard Slide 1 Strategic Planning - Mission, Commitment, Goals - Objectives, Action Plans - Evidence of Implementation, Impact - GREET - Accountability
More informationRATIFIED BY: 1.00 POSITION TITLE: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HEAD SOPH
, EFFECTIVE: December 2015 SUPERSEDES: December 2014 AUTHORITY: Orientation Planning Committee (OPC) RATIFIED BY: Orientation Planning Committee (OPC) PAGE 1of 6 1.00 POSITION TITLE: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY
More informationCALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
2015-16 Federal Program Monitoring Agency Review Coordinators Presentation August 2015 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, Topics General FPM overview Role of participants in the FPM process
More informationEDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT By 2030, at least 60 percent of Texans ages 25 to 34 will have a postsecondary credential or degree. Target: Increase the percent of Texans ages 25 to 34 with a postsecondary credential.
More informationPSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016
PSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016 Instructor: Gary Alderman Office Location: Kinard 110B Office Hours: Mon: 11:45-3:30; Tues: 10:30-12:30 Email: aldermang@winthrop.edu Phone:
More information