Midterm (25%) Paper test: 15% Interview: 10% Did it: 5% Did not do it: 0% Did it: 5% Did not do it: 0% CV (5%) Did it: 5% Did not do it: 0%

Transcription

1 The Royal Commission at Yanbu Sector of Colleges and Institutes Yanbu University College - Male Campus Applied Linguistics Department Presentation Evaluation For the individual and group presentations, you can present again the same topic you had, but also you can change it; you have to notify me if you did so. For the individual presentation, it should not take more than 8 minutes. For the group presentation it should not take more than 15 minutes. A reminder of the grade distribution: Midterm (25%) Paper test: 15% Interview: 10% Individual presentation (practice) (2.5%) Group presentation (practice) (2.5%) Did it: 5% Did not do it: 0% Did it: 5% Did not do it: 0% CV (5%) Did it: 5% Did not do it: 0% Individual presentation (assessed) (10%) Group presentation (assessed) (10%) Final Exam (45%) Paper test: 30% Meeting (5%): all members of the meeting take the same Group presentation (10%): I will give you the topic. You have to notify me with the names of the group and I will send your topic. Total: 100%

2 A: Presenter s Performance (60%) (for group presentation 60%) T h e p r e s e n t e r o p e n e d h i s presentation strongly in which he engaged the audience through humor, questions, facts, stories, or persuading arguments. The presenter explained his learning outcomes clearly to the audience. The presenter introduced himself to the audience with confident, and introduced the topic with enthusiasm. The presenter kept effective eyecontact during the presentation, and used hand gestures to grab the attention of the audience. The presenter did not read a lot from his slides and the audience s attention were toward him not the slides. He was controlling the audience attention to either him or his slides. The presenter clearly shifts from one topic to another in which the audience did not lose interest nor felt disoriented. The presenter was confident all the time; he had a smile on his face, with gestures full of confidence. The presenter s voice was clear, and his notation changed as necessary. He pauses and speaks s l o w l y w h e n h e w a n t t o emphasize an important point. The presenter tried to open his presentation with an engaging joke, story, fact, or humor; he was able to engage some of the audience but was not very successful. The presenter read his learning outcomes to the audience. The presenter introduced himself and his topic but it was not persuasive nor that engaging. The presenter tried to keep eyecontact and early used his hand gestures to engage the audience. The presenter did not read although in some points he read where he could have avoided that. He tried to control the audience s attention to either him or the slides at times he was successful, and in others wasn t. The presenter tried to shift successfully from one topic to a n o t h e r ; a t t i m e s h e w a s successful and at times he wasn t. His audience had problems cooping up with the presentation s progress. The presenter was, to an extent, confident. Although, it seems that he was feeling nervous or stressful. The presenter s voice was fairly clear, although he had problems with his voice intonation. He did not, at times, pause nor speak slowly when it was required to do so. The presenter did not open his presentation with anything and did not engage the audience. The presenter did not refer at all to the learning outcomes. The presenter did not introduce himself nor his topic. The presenter did not have any eye-contact with the audience nor any interactive hand gestures. The presenter only read his presentation and the audience s attention was towards the slides not the presenter. The presenter did not indicate when he was shifting from one topic to another. His audience lost interest and felt disoriented. The presenter was not confident at all. His face showed clearly that he is afraid of presenting. The presenter s voice was not clear, and audible. He had s i g n i fi c a n t p r o b l e m s w i t h intonation and did not pause or speak slowly when it was necessary.

3 The presenter's language was advanced. He used a variety of words that were related to his topic. His grammar was perfect a n d d i d n o t c o m m i t a n y grammatical mistakes. The presenter used arguments, examples, facts, and analogies to explain his content. T h e p r e s e n t e r c l o s e d h i s presentation perfectly and strongly. His closing was catchy, witty and intelligent. In his closing he concluded, summarized, and contemplated on his topic. The presenter time-managed his presentation successfully. The presenter s language was fair. He used a reasonable variation of relevant words. His grammar was fairly good. T h e p r e s e n t e r u s e d s o m e arguments. examples, facts and analogies to explain his content. T h e p r e s e n t e r c l o s e d h i s presentation fairly. He concluded and summarized his The presenter, to an extent, was successful in time-managing his The presenter's language was poor. He did not use a variety of words; his grammar was poor and full of mistakes. The presenter did not use examples, facts, arguments or analogies to explain his content. The presenter did not close his presentation properly nor he summarized or concluded his The preserver did not manage his time properly.

4 B: Content and design of the presentation (40%) (for group presentation 30%) The presentation has a welldesigned, engaging, eye-catching title slide. The presentation has listed the learning outcomes clearly. T h e p r e s e n t a t i o n i s comprehensive, cohesive, and well-structured, and has a logical flow. The presentation s content is free from grammar and spelling mistakes. The slides are well-designed, using suitable colors for the topic. The font is clear and the bullet points are well created. The presentation slides had no more than words in a slide. There was no cramming up of content in a single slide. The presentation has navigation slides. And they were necessary to be included. The presentation included tables, figures, images, and charts. There were relevant and of high quality. They were not complicated nor full of details. The presentation has a summary/ conclusion slide that perfectly served its purpose. The Presentation is authentic and original. The presentation used references. The presentation has a a fairly well-designed title page. The presentation has listed the learning outcomes, although some of them were ambiguous. The presentation is detailed and well-structured although it lacks some of its logical flow. The presentation s content had occasionally some grammar and spelling mistakes. The slides are well-designed although it could be improved by changing some of the colors or increasing the font. Some of the bullet points were badly created. The presentation slides had more than 50 words although it was still reasonable and did not cram up content in one slide. The presentation had navigation slides although they were missed at points. The presentation included tables, figures, images, and charts. Some of them were irrelevant and of low-quality. Some of them were detailed and complicated. T h e p r e s e n t a t i o n h a s a c o n c l u s i o n / s u m m a r y s l i d e although it did not, to an extent, fully summarized the The presentation is authentic and original although no referencing was available. The presentation has a title page. The presentation did not have learning outcomes. T h e p r e s e n t a t i o n i s n o t comprehensive and did not cover all of the learning outcomes. It has no logic in its flow. The presentation s content is full of grammar and spelling mistakes. The slides are badly designed, the choice of colors is bad, and the font and its size was not clear at all. The presentation slides had a large number of words and they were annoyingly full of content engaging the habit of reading slides without paying attention to the presenter. The presentation does not have navigation slides. The presentation did not include any visuals. The presentation did not have a conclusion nor a summary slide. The presentation is not authentic nor original. No referencing was made.

5 C: For the Group Presentation: (10%) Presenters shifted from one topic to another clearly in which they introduced each other. Presenters answered questions clearly and each member was able to answer the questions that are related to his section of the The Presentation is authentic and original. The presentation used references. Presenters shifted from one topic to another clearly, although some members did not introduce others nor the new topics. Presenters answered questions clearly alight answers were more from one to two members of the group and some did not answer the questions of their section of the The presentation is authentic and original although no referencing was available. Presenters did not shift from one topic to another clearly and easily. Members did not introduce each other. Presenters did not answer questions about the The presentation is not authentic nor original. No referencing was made. D: Meeting Evaluation: PASS (100-60%) FAIL (below 60%) The agenda was sent before the meeting to me at The agenda was NOT sent before the meeting to me at The chair of the meeting assigned a person with writing the minutes. The chair of the meeting DID NOT assign a person with writing the minutes. The leader opened the meeting properly The leader did not open the meeting properly The members of the meeting sticked in their discussions to the agenda. The members of the meeting DID NOT stick in their discussions to the agenda. All members of the meeting shared equally of by specialization in the meeting s discussions. All members of the meeting did not equally participate in the discussions. The meeting was time-managed The meeting was poorly time-managed There was respect between participants and turntaking was respected. There was NO (bad comments, shouting, etc.)respect between participants and turn-taking was NOT respected. The leader closed the meeting properly. The leader DID NOT close the meeting properly. The minutes of the meeting were edited and sent to me by the leader at aljohanime@rcyci.edu.sa The minutes of the meeting were NOT edited and/or WAS NOT sent to me by the leader at aljohanime@rcyci.edu.sa The meeting was conducted in English The meeting was NOT conducted in English