HIGHER EDUCATION COMMISSION H-9, Islamabad (Pakistan), Phone: (051) Fax: (051)

Transcription

1 HIG HER EDUC ATION COMMISSION HIGHER EDUCATION COMMISSION H-9, Islamabad (Pakistan), Phone: (051) Fax: (051) PART-A: 1. GENERAL (Evaluation/Nomination Proforma) BEST UNIVERSITY TEACHER AWARD (BUTA) BACK GROUND INFORMATION AND QUALIFICATION 2 recent passport size pictures i. Name of Teacher... ii. Father s Name... iii. Date of Birth N.I.C. No.... iv. Name of University... v. Dept./Institute/College... vi. Present position... vii. Received BUTA previously (from HEC), please mention the year viii. Period of study leave availed during last 5 years: (From to..) ix. Official tour or any other gap during last 5 years: (From to...) x. Phone No.. Cell No... xi Note: Each sub section may be calculated as per following formula: Page number of documentary proofs must be mentioned in the relevant column. * (weightage) 2. QUALIFICATION (Weightage: 5%) S/No. Qualification Detail (write discipline/period) i. MS/M.Phil or Equivalent ii. Ph.D 3 iii. Post-Doctoral Fellowship Abroad Total Proof attached at

2 PART-B: TEACHING (Weightage: 50%) Note: Teacher must have completed his/her workload, credit hours as per defined criteria (may be certified by the QEC). Students Evaluation and peer review may be carried out confidentially by the Director QEC in consultation with the relevant HoD (Committee to be constituted by the HoD for this purpose). i. Student s evaluation (30%) (Annexure I) 70% of students attendance must be ensured for evaluation of the proforma (30) Proof attached at ii. Evaluation by Supervisor (Chairman/ HoD) (Annexure II) (10%) certified by QEC 10 Proof attached at iii. Peer Review(Annexure III) (10%) certified by QEC 10 Proof attached at PART-C: RESEARCH (Weightage: 30%) 1. Research Projects Won (3%) Detail i. Research Projects funded by national agencies of at least one year duration or above. ii. Research Projects funded by International Agencies (greater than 0.5 million). 2 for each completed project 3 for each completed project Total 15 9 Proof attached at -2-

3 2. Research Publications (17%) (maximum 3 publications in last 3 years will be considered) i. International publication with impact factor as a first author Detail 2 per paper Proof attached at ii. International publication with impact factor as a co-author * 1.5 per paper during last 3 years 4.5 iii. Res. publication in refereed local research journals of Int. repute recognized by HEC as a 1st author. 1 per paper 3 iv. Res. publication in refereed local research journals of Int. repute recognized by HEC as a co-author * 0.5 Mark per paper 1.5 v. No of Books Authored (not edited) and published by International Publisher 3 per book 9 vi. No of Books Authored (not edited) and published by national Publisher (HEC Recognized Publishers) * 2 per book vii. Oral Presentations in an International Conference in the year concerned 2 for presentation made per conference viii. Oral Presentations in a national Conference in the year concerned 1 Mark for presentation made per conference 3 Total Research supervision (Weightage: 10%) (Period under evaluation is last three years) i. As a supervisor Ph.D. (maximum 8 students) Detail 4 per student supervised 32 Proof attached at M.Phil./ MS (maximum 12 students) 2 per 24 student supervised Total 5 In case of International Publication with the Impact Factor and publication in local journals as first author, if the nominee exceeds from the maximum limit but do not have any publication as co-author, the nominee will get the score of co-author automatically against his/her additional publications as first author. The same case will be applicable for books published by international and local publishers. -3-

4 PART-D: CO CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES (Weightage: 15%) 1. Educational achievements Detail i. ii. iii. iv. Professional Recognition (5%) Fellowship of national professional bodies (maximum 2 fellowships will be considered Fellowship of International professional bodies (last 3 years) Initiating new teaching programme (including setting up new Laboratories) (maximum 2 programs) Linkages/ Collaborations((National and International ) (maximum 2 linkages) 2 Mark per Fellowship 3 per Fellowship 3 per program 3 per linkage Total 4 22 Proof attached at 2. Professional Developments (5%) (only those training, conferences, workshops attended/organized will be considered which formally notified by the faculty/university). i. Training attended (maximum 2 trainings * ii. Workshops attended (maximum 2 workshops) iii. Conference/Seminar attended(maximum 2 conference) iv. Training organized and conducted (maximum 2 trainings) v. Workshops /Conference/ Seminar organized (maximum 2 workshops) Detail 2 per attended 3 per attended 3 per attended 4 per training 3 per workshop etc. Total Proof attach. P/ No. * 2(a) Cascading in case of HEC Master Trainers-Faculty Professional Development Program (MT-FPDP) is must. If cascading has not been done, 2 marks shall be deducted. 3. Community Service (during last 5 years) (Weightage: 5%) Must be related to the discipline of the nominee including off and on campuses. One page description of the services provided and achievement is required. Must be certified by the Vice Chancellor. HEC Committee of Experts for BUTA will decide the scores for this area. Place Date Applicant's Signature -4-

5 CERTIFICATE It is certified that the nominees have 5 years consecutive service in this university as well as fulfilling all other criteria set by the HEC for the Best University Teacher Award. All relevant documents of the nominees have been checked and examined by the members of the Committee and recommendations have been made keeping in view the Terms & Conditions and criteria set by the HEC. The supporting documents are attached with this proforma and page No (s) of documentary evidences marked in the relevant column. Members of the Committee (1) Signature: Name: Designation: Stamp: 3) Signature: Name: Designation: Stamp: (2) Signature: Name: Designation: Stamp: 4) Signature: Name: Designation: Stamp: Dated: Countersigned & Stamp Vice-Chancellor/Head of Institute -5-

6 Annexure-I Teacher Evaluation Form * (To be filled by the students) Course Title / Number Name of Instructor Department Semester / Year Instructor: Use the following scale to answer the questions and make comments 1-Strongly Disagree 2-Disagree 3-Somewhat Agree 4-Agree 5-Strongly Agree A. The teacher is prepared for each class B. The teacher demonstrates knowledge of the subject C. The teacher has completed the whole course D. The teacher provides additional material apart from the textbook E. The teacher shows respect towards students and encourages class participation F. The teacher arrives on time in class G. The teacher is fair in examination H. The teacher returns assignments and quizzes in a reasonable amount of the time I. The teacher is available during the specified office hours and for after class consultations. J. The teacher uses (practical aspects ) good variety of teaching methods and successfully uses teaching aids (such as video, charts, demonstration) K. The teacher gives useful advice if the student is having difficulty with work. L. The teacher has developed my interest in the subject. Comments Teacher: *Note: This is a sample form, however the form developed by the QEC/Concerned University is also acceptable. --

7 Annexure-II Teacher Evaluation Proforma for Performance Evaluation by Superiors (Dean/ Chairman/HoD) for Best University Teacher Awards * Strongly Disagree Disagree Nether Agree nor Disagree Agree Strongly Agree Criterion # 1 Displays a thorough knowledge of curriculum and subject matter. Criterion # 2 Seek and uses the advice of Educational Specialist in content of subject area. Criterion # 3 Demonstrates effective lecture planning. Criterion # 4 Use appropriate and effective teaching techniques (For example audio/video techniques). Criterion # 5 Models activities congruent with topic being taught and provides guided practice to reinforce. Concepts Criterion # Communicates effectively with students. Criterion # 7 Carries out /adopts appropriate evaluation technique and give proper feedback. Criterion # 8 Reviews and evaluate student achievement data. Criterion # 9 Reliable with meeting deadlines Criterion # 10. Question papers are set based on the models of learning which assesses the knowledge gained from the course. Criterion # 11 Accepts additional responsibility readily. Criterion # 12 Follows University rules & regulation, and adheres to authorized policies, maintains discipline Criterion # 13 Satisfied with personal attributes and disposition (For example properly attired, well groomed). *Note: This is a sample form, however the form developed by the QEC/Concerned University is also acceptable. -7-

8 Teacher evaluation proforma for Performance Evaluation by Peers for Best University Teacher Awards * Annexure -III Strongly Disagree Disagree Nether Agree nor Disagree Agree Strongly Agree Criterion # 1 Displays a thorough knowledge of curriculum and subject matter. Criterion # 2 Seek and uses the advice of Educational Specialist in content of subject area. Criterion # 3 Demonstrates effective lecture planning. Criterion # 4 Uses Additional supporting learning resources. Criterion # 5 Search for attribute and skill developmental opportunities. Criterion # Share the subject knowledge and methodologies learnt and used. Criterion # 7 Communicates effectively with students. Criterion # 8 Models activities congruent with topic being taught and provides guided practice to reinforce concepts. Criterion # 9 Carries out/adopts appropriate evaluation technique and give proper feed back. Criterion # 10 Reviews and evaluate student achievement data. Criterion # 11 Uses different methods of assessment to judge and evaluate the learning and analytical ability of students. Criterion # 12 Accepts additional responsibility readily. Criterion # 13 Follows University rules & regulation, and adheres to authorized policies, maintains discipline. Criterion # 14 Satisfied with personal attributes, disposition (i.e. properly attired, well groom) and inter personal skills. * Note: This is a sample form, however the form developed by the QEC/Concerned University is also acceptable. -8-