PROVYP PROJECT TRANSNATIONAL MEETING SURVEY REPORT
|
|
- Mervin Cole
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 VILNIUS BUSINESS COLLEGE PROVYP PROJECT TRANSNATIONAL MEETING SURVEY REPORT NOVEMBER 16-18, 2015 BAZZANO, ITALY Vilnius, January 2016
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...3 SURVEY ANALYSIS...4 Question 1. How satisfied are you with the information given before the meeting?...4 Question 2. How do you assess the components of the meeting?...6 Question 3. How do you assess the organisational aspects?...9 Question 4. How satisfied are you with personal participation / involvement IN the activity?...11 Question 5. What were the main hopes and expectations for the partner meeting in Bazzano?...11 Question 6. To what extent were these expectations met?...11 Question 7. What did you like the most?...12 Question 8. Was there any part of the meeting that you didn t like?...12 Question 9. Do you have any recommendations / comments suggestions for improvement?...12 CONCLUSION
3 INTRODUCTION The aim of the survey for the transnational meeting of the Professional Orientation of Vulnerable Young People (PROVYP) project in Bazzano (Italy) on November 16-18, 2015, is to measure the project partners satisfaction with the meeting components: preparation for the meeting, the structure of the meeting, its organizational aspects, and personal involvement. The results of the survey will be used for further planning. The survey involved all 20 meeting participants. Responses to questions from 1 to 4 were measured using a 10-point scale (from 0 to 10), where 0 is the lowest score and 10 is the highest score. Questions 5 9 were open ones. 3
4 SURVEY ANALYSIS QUESTION 1. HOW SATISFIED ARE YOU WITH THE INFORMATION GIVEN BEFORE THE MEETING (10-point (from 0 to 10) scale): Concerning the organisation? On the agenda of the meeting? On the accommodation? On aims and objectives of the activity? The first question aimed to find out about the meeting participants satisfaction with the information given before the meeting (Table 1, Figure 1). Table 1. Participants' answers to the question How satisfied are you with the information given before the meeting? components Question 10-point scale component Concerning the organisation? Answers, % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 10% 0% 10% 15% 60% Answers in number On the agenda of the meeting? Answers, % 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 10% 15% 70% Answers in number On the accommodation? Answers, % 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 5% 5% 25% 60% Answers in number On aims and objectives of the activity? Answers, % 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 35% 55% Answers in number % 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 0 Concerning the organisation? 10% 1 15% 60% 2 3 On the agenda of the meeting? 10% 4 15% 70% 5 On the accommodation? 6 5% 25% 60% 7 8 On aims and objectives of the activity? 5% 9 35% 55% 10 Figure 1. Participants' answers to the question How satisfied are you with the information given before the meeting? components, % 4
5 Respondents answers to the question components: Concerning the organisation: the majority of the respondents (60%; N=12) assigned the highest point 10; 15 % (N=3) assigned 9 points; 8 and 6 points were assigned by 10 % each (N=2). Only 1 participant (5%) assigned the lowest point 5. On the agenda of the meeting: the majority of the respondents (70%; N=14) assigned the highest point -10, 15 % (N=3) assigned 9 points, 10 % (N=2)- assigned 8 points. Only 1 participant (5%) assigned the lowest point 3. On the accommodation: the majority of the respondents (60%; N=12) assigned the highest point 10, 25 % (N=3) assigned 9 points. 8, 7 and 4 points were assigned by 1 participant each (5%). On aims and objectives of the activity: the majority of the respondents (55%; N=11) assigned the highest point 10, 35 % (N=7) assigned 9 points. 8 and 3 points were assigned by 1 participant each (5%). Summing up the results of the first question, it can be pointed out that the majority of the participants were satisfied with Information given before the meeting: 91.25% (N=73) were very satisfied (from 8 to 10 points), 5% (N=4) were moderately satisfied (from 5 to 7 points), and only 3.75% (N=3) were less satisfied (from 0 to 4 points) (Figure 2). How satisfied are you with the information given before the meeting? 3; 3,75% 4; 5,00% From 0 to 4 From 5 to 7 73; 91,25% From 8 to 10 Figure 2. Summary on the question How satisfied are you with the information given before the meeting? The average of the question components is also very high points out of 11. Points for each criterion distributed almost equally (min. 10. max. 10.3) (Table 2). Table 2. The average score of participants' answers to the question How satisfied are you with the information given before the meeting? components Question component The average score Max. Concerning the organisation? On the agenda of the meeting? On the accommodation? On aims and objectives of the activity? Average, total
6 QUESTION 2. HOW DO YOU ASSESS THE COMPONENTS OF THE MEETING: (10- point (from 0 to 10) scale): Meeting agenda in General? The information flow on the activity? The communication with the coordinator? The communication with the other partners involved in the activity? Selection of working methods? Contribution of participants (participation in the discussions etc.)? The time and space allocated for the discussion of every issue? The fulfilment of objectives envisaged? The decisions taken on the next steps to take? The second question aimed to find out meeting participants assessment of the meeting components (Table 3, Figure 3). Table 3. Participants' answers to the question How do you assess the components of the meeting? components Question 10-point scale component Meeting agenda in general? Answers, % 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 15% 30% 50% Answers in number The information flow on the activity? Answers, % 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 35% 40% Answers in number The communication with the coordinator? Answers, % 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 5% 20% 70% Answers in number The communication with the other partners involved in the activity? Answers, % 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 15% 20% 25% 35% Answers in number Selection of working methods? Answers, % 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 10% 20% 15% 50% Answers in number Contribution of participants (participation in the discussions etc.)? Answers, % 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 10% 0% 15% 30% 40% Answers in number The time and space allocated for the discussion of every issue? Answers, % 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 15% 10% 40% 30% Answers in number The fulfilment of objectives envisaged? Answers, % 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 15% 5% 35% 40% Answers in number The decisions taken on the next steps to take? Answers, % 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 5% 5% 5% 60% 20% Answers in number
7 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Meeting agenda in general 30% 50% The information flow on the activity The communication with the coordinator The communication with the other partners involved in the activity Selection of working methods Contribution of participants (participation in the discussions etc.) The time and space allocated for the discussion of every issue 35% 40% 20% 25% 35% 15% 50% 30% 40% 30% 40% 70% The fulfilment of objectives envisaged 35% 40% The decisions taken on the next steps to take Figure 3. Participants' answers to the question How do you assess the components of the meeting? components, % Respondents answers to the question components: Meeting agenda in General: a half of the respondents (50%; N=10) assigned the highest point 10, 30 % (N=6) assigned 9 points, 15 % (N=3) - assigned 9 points. Only 1 participant (5%) assigned the lowest point 4. The information flow on the activity: the biggest part of the respondents (40%; N=8) assigned the highest point 10, 35 % (N=7) assigned 9 points, 20 % (N=4)- assigned 8 points. Only 1 participant (5%) assigned the lowest point 3. The communication with the coordinator: the majority of the respondents (70%; N=14) assigned the highest point 10, 20 % (N=4) assigned 9 points. 8 and 4 points were assigned by 1 participant each (5%). The communication with the other partners involved in the activity: the biggest part of the respondents (35%; N=7) assigned the highest point 10, 25 % (N=5) assigned 9 points, 20% (N=4) assigned 8 points, 15% (N=3) assigned 7 points. Only 1 participant (5%) assigned the lowest point 4. Selection of working methods: a half of the respondents (50%; N=10) assigned the highest point 10, 20 % (N=4) assigned 8 points, 15% (N=3) assigned 9 points, 10% (N=2) assigned 7 points. Only 1 participant (5%) assigned the lowest point 3. Contribution of participants (participation in the discussions etc.): the biggest part of the respondents (40%; N=8) assigned the highest point 10, 30 % (N=6) assigned 9 points, 15% (N=3) assigned 8 points, 10% (N=2) assigned 6 points. Only 1 participant (5%) assigned the lowest point 2. 20% 60% 7
8 The time and space allocated for the discussion of every issue: the biggest part of the respondents (40%; N=8) assigned 9 points, 30 % (N=6) assigned the highest point 10, 15% (N=3) assigned 7 points, 10% (N=2) assigned 8 points. Only 1 participant (5%) assigned the lowest point 2. The fulfilment of objectives envisaged: the biggest part of the respondents (40%; N=8) assigned the highest point 10, 35 % (N=7) assigned 9 points, 15 % (N=3) - assigned 7 points. 8 and 2 points were assigned by 1 participant each (5%). The decisions taken on the next steps to take: the majority of the respondents (60%; N=12) assigned 9 points, 20 % (N=4) assigned the highest point 10. 8, 7, 6 and 2 points were assigned by 1 participant each (5%). Summing up the results of the second question, it can be pointed out that the majority of the participants were satisfied with the components of the meeting: 86,67% (N=156) were very satisfied (from 8 to 10 points), 8,33% (N=15) were moderately satisfied (from 5 to 7 points), and only 5,00% (N=9) were less satisfied (from 0 to 4 points). The average of the question components is also very high points out of 11 (Figure 4). How do you assess the components of the meeting? 9; 5,00% 15; 8,33% 156; 86,67% From 0 to 4 From 5 to 7 From 8 to 10 Figure 4. Summary on the question How do you assess the components of the meeting? The highest point (average score ) was assigned to the meeting component The communication with the coordinator, the lowest (average score ) - to the meeting component The time and space allocated for the discussion of every issue (Table 4). Table 4. The average score of participants' answers to the question How do you assess the components of the meeting? components Question component The average score Max. Meeting agenda in general 10,10 11 The information flow on the activity 9,90 11 The communication with the coordinator 10,40 11 The communication with the other partners involved in the activity 9,60 11 Selection of working methods 9,80 11 Contribution of participants (participation in the discussions etc.) 9,60 11 The time and space allocated for the discussion of every issue 9,55 11 The fulfilment of objectives envisaged 9,70 11 The decisions taken on the next steps to take 9,60 11 Average, total 10,
9 QUESTION 3. HOW DO YOU ASSESS THE ORGANISATIONAL ASPECTS? (10-point (from 0 to 10) scale) Coffee break Lunch Dinner Logistics (the accessibility to the venue) The venue/facility itself The third question aimed to find out meeting participants assessment of the organisational aspects (Table 5, Figure 5). Table 5. Participants' answers to the question How do you assess the organisational aspects? components Question 10-point scale component Coffee break Answers, % 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 5% 45% 45% Answers in number Lunch Answers, % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 10% 15% 25% 50% Answers in number Dinner Answers, % 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 25% 30% 40% Answers in number Logistics (the accessibility to the venue) Answers, % 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 5% 10% 30% 50% Answers in number The venue/facility itself Answers, % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 15% 45% 35% Answers in number Coffee break Lunch Dinner Logistics (the accessibility to the venue) The venue/facility itself 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 45% 45% Figure 5. Participants' answers to the question How do you assess the organisational aspects? components, % 25% 30% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 50%
10 Respondents answers to the question components: Coffee break: 45% (N=9) assigned the highest point 10, 45% (N=9) assigned 9 points. 8 and 4 points were assigned by 1 participant each (5%). Lunch: a half of the respondents (50%; N=10) assigned the highest point 10, 25 % (N=5) assigned 9 points. 8, 7, 6 and 3 points were assigned by 1 participant each (5%). Dinner: the biggest part of the respondents (40%; N=8) assigned the highest point 10, 30% (N=6) assigned 9 points, 25% (N=5) assigned 8 points. 4 points was assigned by 1 participant (5%). Logistics (the accessibility to the venue): a half of the respondents (50%; N=10) assigned the highest point 10, 30 % (N=6) assigned 9 points, 10% (N=2) assigned 8 points. 7 and 4 points were assigned by 1 participant each (5%). The venue/facility itself: the biggest part of the respondents (45%; N=9) assigned 9 points, 35 % (N=7) assigned the highest point 10, 15% (N=3) assigned 8 points. 6 points was assigned by 1 participant (5%). Summing up the results of the third question, it can be pointed out that the majority of the participants were satisfied with organisational aspects: 89.66% (N=159) were very satisfied (from 8 to 10 points), 8.62% (N=15) were moderately satisfied (from 5 to 7 points), and only 1.72% (N=3) were less satisfied (from 0 to 4 points) (Figure 6). How do you assess the organisational aspects? 3; 1,72% 15; 8,62% From 0 to 4 From 5 to 7 156; 89,66% From 8 to 10 Figure 6. Summary on the question How do you assess the organisational aspects? The average of the question components is also very high points out of 11. Points for each criterion distributed almost equally (min max ) (Table 6). Table 6. The average score of participants' answers to the question How do you assess the organisational aspects? components Question component The average score Max. Coffee break 10,15 11 Lunch 10,15 11 Dinner 9,9 11 Logistics (the accessibility to the venue) 10,05 11 The venue/facility itself 10,05 11 Average, total 10,
11 QUESTION 4. HOW SATISFIED ARE YOU WITH PERSONAL PARTICIPATION / INVOLVEMENT IN THE ACTIVITY? (10-point (from 0 to 10) scale) The fourth question aimed to find out meeting participants satisfaction with personal participation/involvement in the activity (Table 7, Figure 7). Table 7. How satisfied are you with personal participation / involvement in the activity? 10-point scale Answers, % 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 30% 35% 30% Answers in number How satisfied are you with personal participation / involvement of the activity? 6; 30% 7; 35% 1; 5% 6; 30% Figure 7. Participants' answers to the question How satisfied are you with personal participation / involvement in the activity? Results indicated that participants were quite satisfied with their involvement: 7 participants (35%) assigned 9 points; 6 participants (30%) assigned 10 points; 6 participants (30%) assigned 8 points; Only 1 participant (5%) assigned 3 points. QUESTION 5. WHAT WERE THE MAIN HOPES AND EXPECTATIONS FOR THE PARTNER MEETING IN BAZZANO? (an open question) The fifth question aimed to find out what were the main participants hopes and expectations for the partner meeting in Bazzano. Participants answers can be classified into two groups: 1. Clarification of main activities, outputs and timetable, according to budget modifications; clarification of roles of the partners (17 responses); 2. To meet other partners, establish good partnership (16 responses). QUESTION 6. TO WHAT EXTENT WERE THESE EXPECTATIONS MET? (an open question) The sixth question aimed to find out to what extent the main participants hopes and expectations were met. 14 participants answered that their hopes and expectations were fully met. 6 participants
12 were partly satisfied. The main reason was lack of concentration on the topic, therefore some project results remained not very clear for some partners. QUESTION 7. WHAT DID YOU LIKE THE MOST? (an open question) The seventh question aimed to find out what project partners liked the most. Participants answers were: 1. Friendly atmosphere, meeting new partners and getting to know their experience (14 responses). 2. Wellcoming hosts (3 responses). 3. Great management activities of the coordinator (2 responses). 4. The motivation to get involved in the work of all participants and their desire to cooperate with partners (2 responses). QUESTION 8. WAS THERE ANY PART OF THE MEETING THAT YOU DIDN T LIKE? (an open question) The eighth question aimed to find out if there was any part of the meeting that partners didn t like. Was there any part of the meeting that you didn t like? 13; 65% 7; 35% Yes No Figure 8. Participants' answers to the question Was there any part of the meeting that you didn t like? Participants answers: 1. No (13 responses). 2. Yes (7 responses). Reasons: a. Low dynamic of the meeting: low flexibility of some partners, too long discussion on the next transnational meeting dates (4 responses). b. Quite expensive lunch and dinner (2 responses). c. Technical problems (1 response). QUESTION 9. DO YOU HAVE ANY RECOMMENDATIONS / COMMENTS SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT? (an open question) The ninth question aimed to find out partner recommendation / comments/ suggestions for the improvement. 10 participants had no recommendations. Other 10 participants gave the following recommendations: 1. Try to structure next meeting in a more efficient way, giving more attention to specific project activities (3 participants). 12
13 2. Check IT devices to save time during the meeting (3 participants). 3. I would recommend inviting the partners with experience in the area of group dynamics and animation to be responsible and to do short team building activities and/or ice breaking games in every future meeting. Also, there will be many decisions to be taken in the future and it will be a delicate question to synchronize the opinions, interests and timetable of all the partners. Maybe we need a kind of agreement about this (1 participant). 4. Although the CE have cut the project budget, the planned activities in the project have to be developed fully. It is necessary to motivate all partners in the next meetings in order to achieve the project objectives (1 participant). 5. More days, to see more centers etc (1 participant). 6. To organize other meetings in bigger cities, like Bologna, Sofia etc. so as to make it easier to get there (1 participant). 13
14 CONCLUSION Summing up the results of the Survey, it can be pointed out that the majority of the participants were satisfied with the meeting components and the meeting itself met their expectations. The following aspects of the meeting were evaluated as most satisfying: Friendly atmosphere, a possibility of meeting new partners and getting to know their experience. Communication with the coordinator. Alongside, the participants of the project offered valuable recommendations on questions 6, 8 and 9 for the improvement of some activities while organizing future meetings. 14
A GENERIC SPLIT PROCESS MODEL FOR ASSET MANAGEMENT DECISION-MAKING
A GENERIC SPLIT PROCESS MODEL FOR ASSET MANAGEMENT DECISION-MAKING Yong Sun, a * Colin Fidge b and Lin Ma a a CRC for Integrated Engineering Asset Management, School of Engineering Systems, Queensland
More informationSession 2B From understanding perspectives to informing public policy the potential and challenges for Q findings to inform survey design
Session 2B From understanding perspectives to informing public policy the potential and challenges for Q findings to inform survey design Paper #3 Five Q-to-survey approaches: did they work? Job van Exel
More informationBLASKI, POLAND Introduction. Italian partner presentation
Introduction Turkish partner Bulgarian partner Italian partner Slovenian partner Report of the activity that took place at Liceum Ogolnoksztalcace, Blaski, Poland concerning the second transnational meeting
More informationBackstage preparation Igniting passion Awareness of learning Directing & planning Reflection on learning
Part II - Youthpass tools and methods Backstage preparation Igniting passion Awareness of learning Directing & planning Reflection on learning Learning interview An interview to help people talk about
More informationSan Marino Unified School District Homework Policy
San Marino Unified School District Homework Policy Philosophy The San Marino Unified School District through established policy recognizes that purposeful homework is an important part of the instructional
More informationInternational Partnerships in Teacher Education: Experiences from a Comenius 2.1 Project
International Partnerships in : Experiences from a Comenius 2.1 Project Per Sivertsen, Bodoe University College, Norway per.sivertsen@hibo.no Abstract Student mobility has had a central place in the Comenius
More informationOFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES SAMPLE WEB CONFERENCE OR ON-CAMPUS INTERVIEW QUESTIONS
OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES SAMPLE WEB CONFERENCE OR ON-CAMPUS INTERVIEW QUESTIONS General: 1. We have your resume here in front of us. Please tell us briefly about your career background and why you re
More informationA Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education
A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education Note: Additional information regarding AYP Results from 2003 through 2007 including a listing of each individual
More informationSpecial Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster
Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster Drayton Infant School Drayton CE Junior School Ghost Hill Infant School & Nursery Nightingale First School Taverham VC CE
More informationECML Project B.1: Intercultural Communication in Teacher Education Workshop Report National Training Event Germany Stuttgart, Oct.
ECML Project B.1: Intercultural Communication in Teacher Education Workshop Report National Training Event Germany Stuttgart, Oct.19th 20th, 2005 CONTEXT The National Training Event in Germany was organised
More informationCommon Core Path to Achievement. A Three Year Blueprint to Success
Common Core Path to Achievement A Three Year Blueprint to Success The Winds of Change Continue to Blow!!! By the beginning of the 2014-2015 School Year, there will be a new accountability system in place
More informationMODULE FRAMEWORK AND ASSESSMENT SHEET
MODULE FRAMEWORK AND ASSESSMENT SHEET LEARNING OUTCOMES (LOS) ASSESSMENT STANDARDS (ASS) FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT ASs Pages and (mark out of ) LOs (ave. out of ) SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT Tasks or tests Ave for
More informationMSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION
MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION Overview of the Policy, Planning, and Administration Concentration Policy, Planning, and Administration Concentration Goals and Objectives Policy,
More informationSubject Inspection of Mathematics REPORT. Marian College Ballsbridge, Dublin 4 Roll number: 60500J
An Roinn Oideachais agus Scileanna Department of Education and Skills Subject Inspection of Mathematics REPORT Marian College Ballsbridge, Dublin 4 Roll number: 60500J Date of inspection: 10 December 2009
More informationDRAFT - Meeting Agenda Schwerin 13 th of Novembre till 14 th of Novembre 2014
DRAFT - Meeting Agenda Schwerin 13 th of Novembre till 14 th of Novembre 2014 PROJECT STAY IN PROJECT NUMBER LLP-LDV-TOI-13-AT-0010 Location of accommodation: All partners are hosted at the InterCity Hotel
More informationPROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program
PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM Institution Submitting Proposal Degree Designation as on Diploma Title of Proposed Degree Program EEO Status CIP Code Academic Unit (e.g. Department, Division, School)
More informationNR-509: ADVANCED PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT Lab/Immersion Weekend Fact Sheet
NR-509: ADVANCED PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT Lab/Immersion Weekend Fact Sheet The Immersion weekend is the lab component of NR-509: Advanced Physical Assessment. It typically takes place during week 7 of NR-509
More informationProcedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review
Procedures for Academic Program Review Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review Last Revision: August 2013 1 Table of Contents Background and BOG Requirements... 2 Rationale
More informationWELCOME PATIENT CHAMPIONS!
WELCOME PATIENT CHAMPIONS! 1. MUTE YOUR COMPUTER 2. DIAL INTO THE CONFERENCE LINE: 1-866-814-9555 a. Conference code: 5695726185 3. If you have questions, use the chat box. We will get started soon. Facilitating
More informationSoftware Maintenance
1 What is Software Maintenance? Software Maintenance is a very broad activity that includes error corrections, enhancements of capabilities, deletion of obsolete capabilities, and optimization. 2 Categories
More informationHow to organise Quality Events
How to organise Quality Events Dear locals, The Quality Assurance Committee s role is to help and support the locals in organising quality events. Quality is the term frequently used in education but often
More informationASHMOLE ACADEMY. Admissions Appeals Booklet
ASHMOLE ACADEMY Admissions Appeals Booklet 2017 Ashmole Academy is its own Admissions Authority. Appeals are, therefore, made directly to the school. This booklet explains how you can make an appeal if
More informationMotivation to e-learn within organizational settings: What is it and how could it be measured?
Motivation to e-learn within organizational settings: What is it and how could it be measured? Maria Alexandra Rentroia-Bonito and Joaquim Armando Pires Jorge Departamento de Engenharia Informática Instituto
More informationACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL. How to Select, Administer, and Evaluate Use of Accommodations for Instruction and Assessment of Students with Disabilities
ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL How to Select, Administer, and Evaluate Use of Accommodations for Instruction and Assessment of Students with Disabilities 5 IMPORTANT STEPS 1. Expect students with disabilities to
More informationD.10.7 Dissemination Conference - Conference Minutes
Project No. 540346-LLP-1-2013-1-GR-LEONARDO-LNW D.10.7 Dissemination Conference - Conference Minutes Effective Writers & Communicators Project September 2015 This project has been funded with support from
More informationMODERNISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF BOLOGNA: ECTS AND THE TUNING APPROACH
EUROPEAN CREDIT TRANSFER AND ACCUMULATION SYSTEM (ECTS): Priorities and challenges for Lithuanian Higher Education Vilnius 27 April 2011 MODERNISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF
More informationCooper Upper Elementary School
LIVONIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS www.livoniapublicschools.org/cooper 213-214 BOARD OF EDUCATION 213-14 Mark Johnson, President Colleen Burton, Vice President Dianne Laura, Secretary Tammy Bonifield, Trustee Dan
More informationYouth Mental Health First Aid Instructor Application
Youth Mental Health First Aid Instructor Application April 6 10, 2015 Somerset Church of the Brethren Overview: Becoming a Mental Health First Aid Instructor Becoming a Mental Health First Aid instructor
More informationEducational system gaps in Romania. Roberta Mihaela Stanef *, Alina Magdalena Manole
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia - Social and Behavioral Scien ce s 93 ( 2013 ) 794 798 3rd World Conference on Learning, Teaching and Educational Leadership (WCLTA-2012)
More informationGuidelines for Mobilitas Pluss postdoctoral grant applications
Annex 1 APPROVED by the Management Board of the Estonian Research Council on 23 March 2016, Directive No. 1-1.4/16/63 Guidelines for Mobilitas Pluss postdoctoral grant applications 1. Scope The guidelines
More informationP A S A D E N A C I T Y C O L L E G E SHARED GOVERNANCE
P A S A D E N A C I T Y C O L L E G E SHARED GOVERNANCE rief History In 1988, the California Legislature and the Governor approved AB 1725 (Vasconcellos), renamed the Walter Stiern Act in 1990, which directed
More informationCouncil of the European Union Brussels, 4 November 2015 (OR. en)
Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 November 2015 (OR. en) 13631/15 NOTE From: To: General Secretariat of the Council JEUN 96 EDUC 285 SOC 633 EMPL 416 CULT 73 SAN 356 Permanent Representatives Committee/Council
More informationReforms for selection procedures fundamental programmes and SB grant. June 2017
Reforms for selection procedures fundamental programmes and SB grant June 2017 Contents Objectives Principles Focal points current procedure Decisions Introduction of reforms Reforms for fellowships Evaluation
More informationPractices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois
Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois Summary of the Practice. Step Up to High School is a four-week transitional summer program for incoming ninth-graders in Chicago Public Schools.
More informationSTUDY ABROAD INFORMATION MEETING
STUDY ABROAD INFORMATION MEETING WHY ARE WE HERE TODAY? Are you ready to go? How can you go? When can you go? Qualifying for an exchange position Where to find information Where can you go? Practical considerations
More informationStatewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System
Statewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System Decision Point Outline December 14, 2009 Vision CalSWEC, the schools of social work, the regional training academies,
More informationImplementing a tool to Support KAOS-Beta Process Model Using EPF
Implementing a tool to Support KAOS-Beta Process Model Using EPF Malihe Tabatabaie Malihe.Tabatabaie@cs.york.ac.uk Department of Computer Science The University of York United Kingdom Eclipse Process Framework
More information2013 Annual HEITS Survey (2011/2012 data)
2013 Annual HEITS Survey (2011/2012 data) I would like to invite you to take part in this year s Higher Education Information Technology Statistics (HEITS) Survey. Institutions who participate in the HEITS
More informationJob Description Head of Religious, Moral and Philosophical Studies (RMPS)
Job Description Head of Religious, Moral and Philosophical Studies (RMPS) George Watson s College wishes to appoint a Head of Religious, Moral and Philosophical Studies (RMPS) from January 2018. The post
More informationStimulating Techniques in Micro Teaching. Puan Ng Swee Teng Ketua Program Kursus Lanjutan U48 Kolej Sains Kesihatan Bersekutu, SAS, Ulu Kinta
Stimulating Techniques in Micro Teaching Puan Ng Swee Teng Ketua Program Kursus Lanjutan U48 Kolej Sains Kesihatan Bersekutu, SAS, Ulu Kinta Learning Objectives General Objectives: At the end of the 2
More informationWhat to Do When Conflict Happens
PREVIEW GUIDE What to Do When Conflict Happens Table of Contents: Sample Pages from Leader s Guide and Workbook..pgs. 2-15 Program Information and Pricing.. pgs. 16-17 BACKGROUND INTRODUCTION Workplace
More informationCOMMUNICATION PLAN. We believe that all individuals are valuable and worthy of respect.
COMMUNICATION PLAN MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Tipp City Exempted Village Schools is to provide an exemplary education so that all students become responsible participants in society. VISION The
More informationHOW DO YOU IMPROVE YOUR CORPORATE LEARNING?
HOW DO YOU IMPROVE YOUR CORPORATE LEARNING? GAMIFIED CORPORATE LEARNING THROUGH BUSINESS SIMULATIONS MAX MONAUNI MARIE GUILLET ANGELA FEIGL DOMINIK MAIER 1 Using gamification elements in corporate learning
More informationVII Medici Summer School, May 31 st - June 5 th, 2015
VII Medici Summer School, May 31 st - June 5 th, 2015 Social Valuation in Organizational, Interpersonal, and Market Contexts We are pleased to announce the organization of the 7 th edition of the Medici
More informationWhole School Evaluation REPORT. Tigh Nan Dooley Special School Carraroe, County Galway Roll Number: 20329B
An Roinn Oideachais agus Scileanna Department of Education and Skills Whole School Evaluation REPORT Tigh Nan Dooley Special School Carraroe, County Galway Roll Number: 20329B Date of inspection: 19 September
More informationEAL Train the Trainer Course New dates: 31 st January 1 st February 2018
EAL Train the Trainer Course New dates: 31 st January 1 st February 2018 1. Does your school have many new and improving English language learners? 2. Do you need these learners to make accelerated progress?
More informationPERFORMING ARTS. Unit 2 Proposal for a commissioning brief Suite. Cambridge TECHNICALS LEVEL 3. L/507/6467 Guided learning hours: 60
2016 Suite Cambridge TECHNICALS LEVEL 3 PERFORMING ARTS Unit 2 Proposal for a commissioning brief L/507/6467 Guided learning hours: 60 Version 1 September 2015 ocr.org.uk/performingarts LEVEL 3 UNIT 2:
More information(Includes a Detailed Analysis of Responses to Overall Satisfaction and Quality of Academic Advising Items) By Steve Chatman
Report #202-1/01 Using Item Correlation With Global Satisfaction Within Academic Division to Reduce Questionnaire Length and to Raise the Value of Results An Analysis of Results from the 1996 UC Survey
More informationFocus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION
Focus on Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL ACCREDITING COMMISSION FOR SCHOOLS, WESTERN ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES www.acswasc.org 10/10/12 2013 WASC EDITION Focus on Learning THE ACCREDITATION
More informationleading people through change
leading people through change Facilitator Guide Patricia Zigarmi Judd Hoekstra Ken Blanchard Authors Patricia Zigarmi Judd Hoekstra Ken Blanchard Product Developer Kim King Art Director Beverly Haney Proofreaders
More informationNC Community College System: Overview
NC Community College System: Overview Presentation to Joint Appropriations Subcommittee on Education Brett Altman Mark Bondo Fiscal Research Division March 18, 2015 Presentation Agenda 1. NCCCS Background
More informationHampton Falls School Board Meeting September 1, W. Skoglund and S. Smylie.
School Board Members present: Administration present: R. Moyer Ratigan; Chair, E. Christo; Vice chair, T. Baker, W. Skoglund and S. Smylie. Dr. R. Sullivan; Superintendent, B. Hopkins; Assistant Superintendent,
More informationIntroduction. Background. Social Work in Europe. Volume 5 Number 3
12 The Development of the MACESS Post-graduate Programme for the Social Professions in Europe: The Hogeschool Maastricht/ University of North London Experience Sue Lawrence and Nol Reverda The authors
More informationWork Placement Programme. Learn English in the heart of Ireland. Shannon Academy of English.
Placement Programme Learn English in the heart of Ireland www.shannonacademy.com Shannon Academy of English Welcome Located in Athlone in Co. Westmeath in the heart of Ireland, the Shannon Academy of English
More informationStaff Management in Adult Education Institutions
Staff Management in Adult Education Institutions Grundtvig in-service training course Reference Number: PL-2011-094-004 This training course is for you: If you work in the sector of adult education (adult
More informationTheory of Probability
Theory of Probability Class code MATH-UA 9233-001 Instructor Details Prof. David Larman Room 806,25 Gordon Street (UCL Mathematics Department). Class Details Fall 2013 Thursdays 1:30-4-30 Location to be
More informationManipulative Mathematics Using Manipulatives to Promote Understanding of Math Concepts
Using Manipulatives to Promote Understanding of Math Concepts Multiples and Primes Multiples Prime Numbers Manipulatives used: Hundreds Charts Manipulative Mathematics 1 www.foundationsofalgebra.com Multiples
More informationSection 7, Unit 4: Sample Student Book Activities for Teaching Listening
Section 7, Unit 4: Sample Student Book Activities for Teaching Listening I. ACTIVITIES TO PRACTICE THE SOUND SYSTEM 1. Listen and Repeat for elementary school students. It could be done as a pre-listening
More informationGetting a Sound Bite Across. Heather Long, MD ACMT Annual Scientific Meeting Clearwater, FL March 28, 2015
Getting a Sound Bite Across Heather Long, MD ACMT Annual Scientific Meeting Clearwater, FL March 28, 2015 How to be an effective science communicator Distill your message Make your message effective Be
More informationLinking the Common European Framework of Reference and the Michigan English Language Assessment Battery Technical Report
Linking the Common European Framework of Reference and the Michigan English Language Assessment Battery Technical Report Contact Information All correspondence and mailings should be addressed to: CaMLA
More informationStudent Morningness-Eveningness Type and Performance: Does Class Timing Matter?
Student Morningness-Eveningness Type and Performance: Does Class Timing Matter? Abstract Circadian rhythms have often been linked to people s performance outcomes, although this link has not been examined
More informationENGLAND ALPINE SKI TEAM
The following pages outline the selection criteria and considerations that Snowsport England intends to apply for England Alpine Team, England Alpine Development Team and British Alpine Development Team
More informationCall for Volunteers. Short-term EVS. Volunteering for Acceptance and Diversity. About CID
Call for Volunteers Short-term EVS Volunteering for Acceptance and Diversity About CID Center for Intercultural Dialogue (CID) is a civil society organization working to promote intercultural acceptance
More informationEvery curriculum policy starts from this policy and expands the detail in relation to the specific requirements of each policy s field.
1. WE BELIEVE We believe a successful Teaching and Learning Policy enables all children to be effective learners; to have the confidence to take responsibility for their own learning; understand what it
More informationBriefing for Parents on SBB, DSA & PSLE
Briefing for Parents on SBB, DSA & PSLE 18 May 2017 6.30pm to 8.00pm Vision: Hearts of Service * Minds of Inquiry * Joy in Learning * Confidence in Life Mission: Together we bring out the best in every
More informationStudent-led IEPs 1. Student-led IEPs. Student-led IEPs. Greg Schaitel. Instructor Troy Ellis. April 16, 2009
Student-led IEPs 1 Student-led IEPs Student-led IEPs Greg Schaitel Instructor Troy Ellis April 16, 2009 Student-led IEPs 2 Students with disabilities are often left with little understanding about their
More informationStakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)
Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP) Summary box REVIEW TITLE 3ie GRANT CODE AUTHORS (specify review team members who have completed this form) FOCAL POINT (specify primary contact for
More informationSimilar Triangles. Developed by: M. Fahy, J. O Keeffe, J. Cooper
Similar Triangles Developed by: M. Fahy, J. O Keeffe, J. Cooper For the lesson on 1/3/2016 At Chanel College, Coolock Teacher: M. Fahy Lesson plan developed by: M. Fahy, J. O Keeffe, J. Cooper. 1. Title
More informationCarolina Course Evaluation Item Bank Last Revised Fall 2009
Carolina Course Evaluation Item Bank Last Revised Fall 2009 Items Appearing on the Standard Carolina Course Evaluation Instrument Core Items Instructor and Course Characteristics Results are intended for
More informationSuccess Factors for Creativity Workshops in RE
Success Factors for Creativity s in RE Sebastian Adam, Marcus Trapp Fraunhofer IESE Fraunhofer-Platz 1, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany {sebastian.adam, marcus.trapp}@iese.fraunhofer.de Abstract. In today
More informationAssessment. the international training and education center on hiv. Continued on page 4
the international training and education center on hiv I-TECH Approach to Curriculum Development: The ADDIE Framework Assessment I-TECH utilizes the ADDIE model of instructional design as the guiding framework
More informationOn Human Computer Interaction, HCI. Dr. Saif al Zahir Electrical and Computer Engineering Department UBC
On Human Computer Interaction, HCI Dr. Saif al Zahir Electrical and Computer Engineering Department UBC Human Computer Interaction HCI HCI is the study of people, computer technology, and the ways these
More informationPOST-16 LEVEL 1 DIPLOMA (Pilot) Specification for teaching from September 2013
POST-16 LEVEL 1 DIPLOMA (Pilot) Specification for teaching from September 2013 Contents Page 1. Introduction and Rationale 3 1.1 Qualification Title and Codes 3 1.2 Rationale 3 1.3 Structure of the Qualification
More informationEnhancing Learning with a Poster Session in Engineering Economy
1339 Enhancing Learning with a Poster Session in Engineering Economy Karen E. Schmahl, Christine D. Noble Miami University Abstract This paper outlines the process and benefits of using a case analysis
More informationRECRUITMENT AND EXAMINATIONS
CHAPTER V: RECRUITMENT AND EXAMINATIONS RULE 5.1 RECRUITMENT Section 5.1.1 Announcement of Examinations RULE 5.2 EXAMINATION Section 5.2.1 Determination of Examinations 5.2.2 Open Competitive Examinations
More informationLinking the Ohio State Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *
Linking the Ohio State Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests * *As of June 2017 Measures of Academic Progress (MAP ) is known as MAP Growth. August 2016 Introduction Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA
More informationA. What is research? B. Types of research
A. What is research? Research = the process of finding solutions to a problem after a thorough study and analysis (Sekaran, 2006). Research = systematic inquiry that provides information to guide decision
More informationHigher education is becoming a major driver of economic competitiveness
Executive Summary Higher education is becoming a major driver of economic competitiveness in an increasingly knowledge-driven global economy. The imperative for countries to improve employment skills calls
More informationThe Extend of Adaptation Bloom's Taxonomy of Cognitive Domain In English Questions Included in General Secondary Exams
Advances in Language and Literary Studies ISSN: 2203-4714 Vol. 5 No. 2; April 2014 Copyright Australian International Academic Centre, Australia The Extend of Adaptation Bloom's Taxonomy of Cognitive Domain
More informationMaterials Under Extreme Conditions: Effects of Temperature, High Strain Rate and Irradiation
ANNOUNCEMENT (Rev 2.9) UK-Japan Symposium on Materials Under Extreme Conditions: Effects of Temperature, High Strain Rate and Irradiation 20 23 September 2015 Pembroke College, Oxford, United Kingdom Organised
More informationHusky Voice enews. NJHS Awards Presentation. Northwood Students Fight Hunger - Twice
Dave Stenersen - Principal MAY 2015 Husky Voice enews Dear Parents, As we move into May, there are several important things happening or about to happen that impact our students, and in the process, you.
More informationPurpose of internal assessment. Guidance and authenticity. Internal assessment. Assessment
Assessment Internal assessment Purpose of internal assessment Internal assessment is an integral part of the course and is compulsory for both SL and HL students. It enables students to demonstrate the
More informationMajor Milestones, Team Activities, and Individual Deliverables
Major Milestones, Team Activities, and Individual Deliverables Milestone #1: Team Semester Proposal Your team should write a proposal that describes project objectives, existing relevant technology, engineering
More informationNovember 23 until November 25, Novedrate (Co)/ITALY
November 23 until November 25, 2017 - Novedrate (Co)/ITALY Dear Friends and Colleagues, The e-campus University, together with its network of partners, has the pleasure of inviting you to the International
More informationFort Lewis College Institutional Review Board Application to Use Human Subjects in Research
Fort Lewis College Institutional Review Board Application to Use Human Subjects in Research Submit this application by email attachment to IRB@fortlewis.edu I believe this research qualifies for a Full
More informationALL-IN-ONE MEETING GUIDE THE ECONOMICS OF WELL-BEING
ALL-IN-ONE MEETING GUIDE THE ECONOMICS OF WELL-BEING LeanIn.0rg, 2016 1 Overview Do we limit our thinking and focus only on short-term goals when we make trade-offs between career and family? This final
More informationBuild on students informal understanding of sharing and proportionality to develop initial fraction concepts.
Recommendation 1 Build on students informal understanding of sharing and proportionality to develop initial fraction concepts. Students come to kindergarten with a rudimentary understanding of basic fraction
More informationProcess improvement, The Agile Way! By Ben Linders Published in Methods and Tools, winter
Process improvement, The Agile Way! By Ben Linders Published in Methods and Tools, winter 2010. http://www.methodsandtools.com/ Summary Business needs for process improvement projects are changing. Organizations
More informationPresentation Advice for your Professional Review
Presentation Advice for your Professional Review This document contains useful tips for both aspiring engineers and technicians on: managing your professional development from the start planning your Review
More informationPossibilities in engaging partnerships: What happens when we work together?
Rhode Island College Digital Commons @ RIC Innovation Lab 11-2-2013 Possibilities in engaging partnerships: What happens when we work together? Julie Horwitz Rhode Island College, jhorwitz@ric.edu Gerri
More informationKnowledge for the Future Developments in Higher Education and Research in the Netherlands
Knowledge for the Future Developments in Higher Education and Research in the Netherlands Don F. Westerheijden Contribution to Vision Seminar Higher education and Research 2030 Helsinki, 2017-06-14 How
More informationTU15: Insider Secrets to Finding High-Impact Sales Training
TU15: Insider Secrets to Finding High-Impact Sales Training January 19, 2016 Brian E. Gracon The Challenge High-Impact Sales Training Learning Objectives At the end of the this course, participants should
More informationObjective: Total Time. (60 minutes) (6 minutes) (6 minutes) starting at 0. , 8, 10 many fourths? S: 4 fourths. T: (Beneat , 2, 4, , 14 , 16 , 12
Lesson 9 5 Lesson 9 Objective: Estimate sums and differences using benchmark numbers. Suggested Lesson Structure F Fluency Practice ( minutes) A Application Problem (3 minutes) C Concept Development (35
More informationDeveloping a Performance Measurement System for University Central Administrative Services
Higher Education Quarterly, 0951 5224 DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2008.00415.x Volume 63, No. 3, July 2009, pp 237 263 Developing a Performance Measurement System for University Central Administrative Services
More informationProject title: Ecological, what else? Sustainable schools on the fast lane in Europe! Final evaluation report. 2nd Dicember 2014.
title: Ecological, what else? Sustainable Pages 1 di 10 First meeting QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE PROCESS AND EVALUATION OF THE PROJECT Student follow-up questionnaire title: Ecological, what else? Sustainable
More informationThinking Maps for Organizing Thinking
Ann Delores Sean Thinking Maps for Organizing Thinking Roosevelt High School Students and Teachers share their reflections on the use of Thinking Maps in Social Studies and other Disciplines Students Sean:
More informationInformation Pack: Exams Officer. Abbey College Cambridge
Information Pack: Exams Officer 1 To be a community energized by a love of learning and the pursuit of outstanding achievement for all Each individual student achieves excellence by achieving significant
More informationBBC Spark : Lean at the BBC
BBC Spark : Lean at the BBC Adrian Ruth Director, BBC Spark Adrian.ruth@bbc.co.uk @adrianruth Gemma Tomkinson Manager, BBC Spark Gemma.Tomkinson@bbc.co.uk @gtomkins Kirsty Robinson Analyst, BBC Spark Kirsty.robinson@bbc.co.uk
More informationGuidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU)
Guidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU) The UNC Policy Manual The essential educational mission of the University is augmented through a broad range of activities generally categorized
More informationCHAPTER 4: REIMBURSEMENT STRATEGIES 24
CHAPTER 4: REIMBURSEMENT STRATEGIES 24 INTRODUCTION Once state level policymakers have decided to implement and pay for CSR, one issue they face is simply how to calculate the reimbursements to districts
More information