Classification of Learning Profile Based on Categories of Student Preferences
|
|
- Hope Jefferson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Classification of Learning Profile Based on Categories of Student s Luciana A M Zaina, Graça Bressan University of São Paulo, lzaina@larc.usp.br,gbressan@larc.usp.br Abstract - In an environment applied in engineering teaching, as in many knowledge areas, is very important to know and understand learner differences in a way to be able to adapt system s actions to student s best learning conditions and aptitudes. Working thus makes it possible to identify learning profiles within a group of students, allowing the system to supply learners with contents and tools more suited for them. The goal of this work is to present the architecture of a system that realizes an evaluation of learning profiles based on categories of student preferences. The categories are defined from Felder-Silverman Learning Style Model. The architecture enables the teacher to specify the observable characteristics he considers most suitable within the teaching scope in question, whose characteristics are related with categories of student preferences. Through the categories create a relationship between what is observed and the learning objects used to build automatically the learning scenarios according to the student learning profile. Index Terms learning profile, learning styles, observable characteristics. INTRODUCTION The need to adapt teaching strategies to the student s preferences is a reality in classrooms, be they physical or virtual. However, this does not mean that a method should be created for each student in a classroom, but that the best form of interaction for each of them be identified, building groups of learners with common characteristics [2]. The personalization of a learning process occurs through the investigation of the student s characteristics. Based on information obtained from his explicit and implicit knowledge, it is possible to model his needs within the context in which he interacts [3]-[4]. The student model supports the adaptation learning process in a specific environment; because of this the decision about the student model content is primarily related with the learning process goal. A student model might be an approximate, possibly partial, representation of student preferences about a particular domain that fully or partially accounts for specific aspects of student behavior. The common explored data about the student is his characteristic, preferences and skills. Besides of this, it is very import to know the context of student interaction to make the relationship between the learning and the scenario where it occurs [8]-[10]. Observing the student interaction is one the most important phase of adaptation process. Because of this, it is necessary to adopt techniques and mechanisms to provide learners with different teach strategies to attend him in an individual way. One of these mechanisms may be to observe the learning style of the students [8]. The objective of this work is to present the architecture of a system which makes the classification of a student within a given learning profile based on profile models predefined by the teacher. The learning profile is identified from information about the student s interaction in a given e- learning environment, which is obtained from a given monitoring mechanism. The profile models are built according to categories of student preferences based on the proposal of learning styles put forward by Felder and Silverman [4], [5]. A relationship between the categories of preferences and the learning objects is used to build automatically the learning scenarios according to the student learning profile. This architecture was defined with the main purpose of being applied to the teaching of engineering. LEARNING PROFILE AND LEARNING STYLES The learning style involves the strategies that a student tends to apply frequently to a given teaching situation. Each individual can fit into different styles that cause him to adopt attitudes and behavior that are repeated in different moments and situations. The learning style of a student evidences his/her learning profile. The learning profile defines a set of characteristics that classifies a student in a specific model during his learning process [6], [14]-[15]. Learning styles are cognitive, affective and psychological traits that determine how a student interacts and reacts in a learning environment [6]. The idea is to identify the marked characteristics of a given learner so that these traits influence his learning process. However, to this end, it is necessary to pinpoint what one considers relevant to observe in the student s interaction with the learning environment [4]. To satisfy a given learning style, the teacher must use teaching strategies that can meet the needs of diverse learning perspectives. The idea is to identify the marked characteristics of a given learner so that these traits influence his learning process. However, to this end, it is necessary to F4E-1
2 pinpoint what one considers relevant to observe in the student s interaction with the learning environment [7]. There are numerous models for the implementation of learning styles, each of which is suitable for a different learning scope. According to Felder and Brent [6], although there are many models to be adopted as learning styles, five can be highlighted that are applicable in the area of engineering teaching: the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator MBTI, Kolb s Experiential Learning Model, the Hermann Brain Dominance Instrument (HBDI), the Dunn and Dunn Model, and the Felder-Silverman Model. Among these models, this work will adopt the one proposed by Felder and Silverman [5] to support the definition of profile models. The Felder-Silverman Learning Style Model is describe by dimensions of Learning and Teaching Styles, creating a relationship to learning styles and teaching strategies that could be adopted to support the student learning style [6]. Table I presents the dimensions of Felder-Silverman Learning Style Model (learning styles and their corresponding teaching strategies). The underlined words represent categories where the dimensions may be fit in. For example, the category delineates the best way to student understand contents based on his/her learning style. TABLE I DIMENSIONS OF FELDER-SILVERMAN LEARNING STYLE MODEL Learning Style sensory intuitive Teaching Strategies concrete abstract Features It is related with the perception of content. visual visual It is related with the format of auditory verbal content presentation. active reflective sequential global active passive sequential global It is related with the student participation in the activities. It is related with the best order to present the content: step-by-step progression or a overview first of content. According to categories and the dimensions of the model presented in Table I it will be possible to create models of learning profile. The Felder-Silverman model was selected, because it s close relationship to learning styles and teaching strategies, resulting in an adherence between these aspects. In [5], Felder and Silverman pinpoint the application of this model in Engineering Education. This is an important point, because there is the intention to apply the architecture proposed in this area. ARCHITECTURE PROPOSED The need to adapt educational environments to teaching strategies that fit a student s learning profile has become a widely discussed issue. Based on this need, this paper proposes architecture of a system that observes the student in a learning process, identifying the learning profile to which a given student is best fitted. The learning profile is obtained through the analysis of data from the student s interaction, based on profile models previously define by the teacher. Figure 1 shows an overview of the architecture which is composed to modules. The architecture enables the teacher to specify the observation features he considers most suitable within the teaching scope in question. The possibility of modeling observation features affords the environment greater flexibility for evaluating learning profiles. This can be done in Module of Observation Planning. FIGURE 1 ARCHITECTURE PROPOSED MODELING OBSERVABLE FEATURES Before starting the definition of observable features is necessary to specify what model of learning style should be used. Various combinations can be derived from the topics defined in [5] to identify and classify the student according to a given learning style. The architecture allows the teacher to define learning profile models which he/she wishes to observe in student behavior and to suggest contents based on profile evaluation. A question to be answered is which data of the student s interaction should be taken into account. In fact, the data are dependent on the teaching objective. For this reason, the classification of the student s learning profile cannot be the same in different teaching scopes. It is necessary to define the features that will be observed during the student interaction in the electronic environment. The teacher will determine the relevant observable features in the Module of Observation Planning. This work adopts two classifications for the observable information about the learning profile: Check Points (insertions of tests and exercises that enable the teacher to make point checks to track the knowledge construction by the student, or even about his familiarity with and/or preference for the adoption of a given type of material or tool); and Learner Interactions (which represent the learner s interactions with the environment, his preferences for types of materials, number of accesses to a given content, interactions with a tool, ). The observation planning should be composed by the follow information: Description of observable feature: describe what will be observed. Function: each observable feature can have a function associated to it, whose purpose is to consolidate the information related to the observable feature. The F4E-2 Student Electronic Environment Locator of learning objects Monitoring Module Learning profile suggested Module of Observation Planning Profile Evaluator Module
3 functions used are functions that already exist in the (Learning Profile Evaluation System) functions library. Location of observation: where the observation will be occurred in the learning environment. Moment of observation: when the observation must be done. Table II presents two observable features of learner interaction type. feature Media Material TABLE II EXAMPLE OF OBSERVABLE FEATURES Function Location Moment MediaMore MaterialType Moreo environment environment interaction interaction The Media observable feature has the goal to verify the format of media that the student more accessed. One student may access different media during his/her interaction in the environment. The MediaMore function has the purpose of consolidate all of these events caught during the student interaction, confronting not only the type of media, but the time that the student spends using it. The consolidation resulting is the format of the media which the student more accessed. One observable feature will reflect a student preference about the feature. Because of this the teacher must classify, during the observation planning, each observable feature in one of categories of preferences:, Presentation Format, Presentation Order or Participation. These categories are adherent to dimensions of Felder-Silverman Learning Style Model presented in Table I. This means that an observable feature classified as will reflect a sensory or intuitive learning profile. Considering the example of Table II is possible to classify as follow (Table III): TABLE III EXAMPLE OF OBSERVABLE FEATURES CLASSIFICATION feature Presentation Format Media Material The group of observable features will compose an Observation Model. The Observation Model will send to Monitoring Module to be used by tracking the student interaction in the e-learning environment. MODELING LEARNING PROFILES The next step is the values specification for each observed feature determining the learning profile types that will be adopted during classification process. The values permit the system to distinguish the different types of learning profile considering the variety of observable features. For example, when the observable item Media has the video value the system consider that the learner should be fitted in a determined learning profile. The teacher should specify values to each observable feature for defining each type of learning profile he will adopt. Table IV and Table V defines two type of learning profiles: TABLE IV EXAMPLE OF TYPE OF LEARNING PROFILE : VISUAL-CONCRETE Type of Learning Profile: Visual-Concrete Presentation Format: Visual Characteristics of Learning Profile: feature : Concrete feature value Presentation Format Media Figure or Video Material Examples or simulations or problem resolution TABLE V EXAMPLE OF TYPE OF LEARNING PROFILE : VERBAL-REFLEXIVE Type of Learning Profile: Verbal-Abstract Presentation Format: Verbal Characteristics of Learning Profile: feature : Abstract feature value Presentation Format Media Text or Sound Material Expositive texts or articles The first example (Table IV) defines observable feature values that describe a Visual-Concrete type of profile. When the student fits in observable features of this type he/she may be classified as Visual-Concrete. The teacher may specify the characteristics of each type of learning profile for the categories of preference used in the observed feature definition. Table IV describes Visual value to the category Presentation format and Concrete value to the category, for instance. One type of learning profile may have many observable features which will be evaluated together during student profile classification process. PUBLISHING OF OBSERVATION MODEL After the definition of observable features and the learning profile types, creates the repository to store information from the monitoring module. Besides this, it sends the Observation Model to monitoring module to track the student interaction catching information planned (Figure 2). MONITORING MODULE The monitoring module catches the results from student interaction of observable features and it sends to that stores the results in the repository. There is no analysis regarding learner interaction during the monitoring process, F4E-3
4 because it is important to get a variety of data to analyze different actions of the student [8]-[9]. The analysis of data from the tracking of student interaction will occur when a student completes a teaching module. Electronic Environment Monitoring Module Repository sends FIGURE 2 ARCHITECTURE PROPOSED PROFILE EVALUATOR MODULE Observed features creates When a student completes a teaching module, the monitoring module triggers an event to, notifying it of the conclusion of the process and informing it who is involved in the interaction. Based on this information, the Profile Evaluator Module consolidates the information about the student s interactions (using the functions associated to each observable feature) that is contained in the repository. The result of this consolidation will determine the values of each item described in the observable feature for a specific student, thus providing information to determine the student profile. Upon concluding the consolidation, the Profile Evaluator Module executes a profile classification algorithm. then classifies the given student according to the learning profile (defined by the teacher previously) he best fits into. Because the profile is evaluated based on several observable features, it is very likely that a learning profile cannot be found that has exactly the same values as those observed for a given learner. To solve this problem, the profile evaluator adopts an instance-based learning algorithm called 1-Nearest Neighbor. Briefly, the 1-Nearest Neighbor algorithm finds the objects that make up a set of systemically known examples closest to another object that is being observed at a given moment [1], [13]. In this work, the set of examples is given by the types of learning profiles defined during the modeling. First is checked the distance between one observable feature (observed value obtained during the monitoring process) and its correspondent feature in a type of learning profile. This distance is called featuresdistance. If the features have correspondence the featuresdistance has the value 0. Otherwise the featuresdistance has the value 1. Figure 3 shows an example of featuresdistance analyses. According to monitoring results and the types of learning profile, it is possible to note that featuresdistance is 0 between the observed value and the observable feature value of Visual-Concrete learning profile. The total distance will be calculated after the featuresdistance calculation for each observable feature. The distance between the analyzed profile and a specific type of learning profile, called total distance is obtained from the sum of all the featuresdistance. For example, the total distance between the analyzed profile and the Visual- Concrete profile is acquired from the sum of all the featuresdistance of the respective type of profile. The equation (1) represents the calculation of total distance : totaldis tan ce( PT, AP) = n feturesdis i PT = profile type AP = analyzed profile i = observable feature n = number of observable features analyzed tan ce After the calculation of the totaldistance between the analyzed profile and each profile type, the algorithm chooses the type of profile that has the minor totaldistance. Thus determines the suggested profile of the student. Presentation Format Set of Types of Learning Profile feature Media Observed feature Value Video Media Monitoring results feature Visual-Concrete featuresdistance FIGURE 3 EXAMPLE OF FEARTURESDISTANCE CALCULATION Figure 4 illustrates the dynamic of to recommend the learning profile. CATOR OF LEARNING OBJECTS Visual- Concrete feature value Figure or Video Verbal- Abstract feature value Text or Sound Verbal-Abstract featuresdistance Media 0 1 Calculate of featuresdistance (1) A learning object can be defined as an entity that can be applied in a teaching-learning process. It may be a text, a video, a figure, a simulator, Within the scope of electronic learning, the aim is to create contents in digital form that can be reused for different learning objectives or even employed in the construction of other learning objects [12]. F4E-4
5 Monitoring Module Who Profile Evaluator Module Consolidation of information of the fields: Title, Description, and Keywords. The result of the search will be the first selection of the possible objects that may be presented to the student. Steps to localize learning objects M fields M Category Repository Classification of Learner Profile Location of concepts Title, Description, and Keywords General Suggested Learning Profile FIGURE 4 DYNAMIC OF LEARNPES One of the ways to organize learning objects so that they can be reused and utilized systematically is through the description of metadata. A metadata can be defined as a set of attributes that describes an entity, facilitating the understanding, use and management of this entity. One of the specifications of the most commonly used metadata is done through the M (Learning Object Metadata) standard of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers IEEE. The M standard [11] has a structure that describes learning objects through descriptor categories that detail data on a given learning object. Each category has a specific purpose, such as describing general attributes of objects, educational objectives, Profile type planning involves the specification of the categories of preferences related with these types of profiles. For example, Table IV specifies that the categories used are Presentation Format and. The fact that the type of profile was defined as Visual and Concrete means that it is characterized by these definitions within the categories of Presentation Format and, respectively. These categories are utilized to locate the learning objects that will match the profile suggested by the environment, relating the categories of preferences to the fields that specify the learning objects according to the M (Learning Object Metadata) standard. This work proposes that the learning objects can be localized so that they adhere to the learning profile and the concepts one wishes to broach in a specific learning scenario. The location is done through the Learning Object Locator, which carries out searches in repositories containing objects catalogued according to the M standard. Figure 5 presents the learning objects selection process. The maintenance of learning objects repositories must be supported by the learning infrastructure that adopts the proposed architecture. When a leaning object is catalogued it will be store in the repository that adopts M specification. The Learning Object Locator will use the description of the concepts of the topics relating to the learning content in order to conduct the first location step. To this end, it uses the General category of the M specification by means Finding the objects that match the student s learning profile Learning Objects selected Interactivity and Learning Resource FIGURE 5 LEARNING OBJECTS SELECTION PROCESS The second location step consists of finding the objects that match the student s learning profile in the set of objects selected in the first step. This is done by verifying the student s learning profile. Using the Educational category of the M standard (Interactivity and Learning Resource fields), the Locator will locate the objects that match the preferences related to the student s learning profile from the set of objects obtained in the first locating step. The Locator will use the Table VI in order to find the objects related to the student s learning profile. When the characteristics of a student s profile indicate he is active or reflective, the teaching strategies that can be adopted are forums, chats, group discussions, For example, if a student has a profile Visual- Concrete as his/her learning profile, the Locator of Learning Objects will search in Interactivity and Learning Resource fields the objects to attend this profile. The locator will associated the characteristic Visual with figures, videos, movies, After carrying out the second location step, the electronic learning environment will receive all the selected learning objects to present them to the student. LEARNING SCENARIO Educational A learning scenario may be considered an entity composed by a set of elements which supports the student during the learning process. The scenario must concern information about the teaching core as the modules of a course, tools, links of material and so one. Concisely, a learning scenario includes the essential items to achieve the learning goal. The items are necessary units to construct the learning process in a gradual cadence. The learning scenarios will be built based on learning objects selected by the Locator of Learning Objects. The electronic learning environment may present more than one learning object to the student allowing him to select the learning object he wishes to work. F4E-5
6 TABLE VI RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MM FIELDS AND PROFILE CHARACTERISTICS M field Type of Interactivity Type of Learning Resource Description of the field s function Describes objects with concrete characteristics (simulation, exercises, case studies, ). Describes objects with abstract characteristics (expository contents) Indicates if the object is a figure, diagram, sound, Indicates if the object is a practical exercise, a case study, Indicates if the object is a complementary reading, theoretical questionnaire, Value of the field active expositor y Figure Video Movie, Text, Sound, Practical exercise, Experime nt, Question naire, Reading CONCLUSIONS Characteristi c of the Profile Concrete Abstract Visual Auditory Active Reflective the Profile Presentation Format Student Participation The development of flexible educational environments (which can be used in different areas of education) that are adaptable has become an important requisite within the teaching-learning process. The creation of different learning scenarios considering different learning profiles is an essential aspect to meet the individual needs of students in an e-learning environment. Within this scope, the identification of learning profiles is indispensable to allow for adequate adaptations to be done. The architecture proposes a model for the definition of learning profiles so that these profiles consider the student s interaction during the period of observation. In addition, the proposed architecture classifies the student within a given learning profile, analyzing the observable features jointly, thereby allowing for profiles more suitable to a given situation to be suggested. The association between learning profiles and learning objects metadata grants dynamism in the process of learning scenarios construction. One future work is to apply the proposed architecture in a group of Computer Engineering students to realize the analyses over the selected learners profiles. From this experience will be possible to verify the convergence of observed features analyzed and the real student profile. After that, the architecture will be expanded to adopt feature distance not only 0 or 1, considering the other possible values that a feature can accept during the interaction. ACKNOWLEDGMENT Our thanks to FAPESP for sponsoring this work. REFERENCES [1] Aha, W, D D. Kibler, and M. K. Albert, Instance-Based Learning Algorithms, Machine Learning, 6, 1, 1991, pp [2] Akhras, N, F, and Self, A, J, Modeling the Process, not the Product of Learning, Computer as Cognitive Tools No More Walls, pp [3] Brusilovsky, P., and Peylo, C, Adaptive and intelligent Web-based educational systems, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13, 2-4, 2003, pp [4] Coffield, F. et al, Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning. A systematic and critical review, Learning and Skills Research Centre, London, [5] Felder, M, R, and Silverman, K, L, Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education, Journal of Engineering Education, 78, 7, 1988, pp [6] Felder, M, R, and Brent, R, Understanding Student Differences, Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 1, 2005, pp [7] Fenrich, P, Practical Suggestions for Addressing Learning Styles in Computer-Based Simulations, Proceedings of The Ninth IASTED International Conference on Computers and Advanced Technology in Education, Lima, Peru, October, 2006, pp [8] Fisher, G, User Modeling in Human-Computer Interaction, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11 (1/2), 2001, pp [9] Kobsa, A, Generic User Modeling Systems, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11, 1/2, 2001, pp [10] Kobsa, A, Koenemann, J, and Pohl, W, Personalised hypermedia presentation techniques for improving online customer relationships., The Knowledge Engineering Review, 16 (2), 2001, pp [11] M, Draft standard for learning object metadata, [12] McGreal, R, Learning Objects: A Practical definition, International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 1, 9, [13] Silva, T, G, and Rosatelli, C, M, Adaptation in Educational Hypermedia based on the Classification of the User Profile, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2006), 2006, pp [14] Stash, N, Cristea, A, and De Bra, P, Authoring of Learning Styles in Adaptive Hypermedia: Problems and Solutions, Proceedings of the WWW 2004 Conference, 2004, pp [15] Tarpin-Bernard, F, Habieb-Mammar, H, Modeling Elementary Cognitive Abilities for Adaptive Hypermedia Presentation, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 15 (5), 2004, pp AUTHOR INFORMATION Luciana A M Zaina Researcher, University of São Paulo, Brazil, lzaina@larc.usp.br. Graça Bressan, Professor, University of São Paulo, Brazil, gbressan@larc.usp.br. F4E-6
Automating the E-learning Personalization
Automating the E-learning Personalization Fathi Essalmi 1, Leila Jemni Ben Ayed 1, Mohamed Jemni 1, Kinshuk 2, and Sabine Graf 2 1 The Research Laboratory of Technologies of Information and Communication
More informationUSER ADAPTATION IN E-LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS
USER ADAPTATION IN E-LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS Paraskevi Tzouveli Image, Video and Multimedia Systems Laboratory School of Electrical and Computer Engineering National Technical University of Athens tpar@image.
More informationGALICIAN TEACHERS PERCEPTIONS ON THE USABILITY AND USEFULNESS OF THE ODS PORTAL
The Fifth International Conference on e-learning (elearning-2014), 22-23 September 2014, Belgrade, Serbia GALICIAN TEACHERS PERCEPTIONS ON THE USABILITY AND USEFULNESS OF THE ODS PORTAL SONIA VALLADARES-RODRIGUEZ
More informationCWIS 23,3. Nikolaos Avouris Human Computer Interaction Group, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at wwwemeraldinsightcom/1065-0741htm CWIS 138 Synchronous support and monitoring in web-based educational systems Christos Fidas, Vasilios
More informationDifferent Requirements Gathering Techniques and Issues. Javaria Mushtaq
835 Different Requirements Gathering Techniques and Issues Javaria Mushtaq Abstract- Project management is now becoming a very important part of our software industries. To handle projects with success
More informationDYNAMIC ADAPTIVE HYPERMEDIA SYSTEMS FOR E-LEARNING
University of Craiova, Romania Université de Technologie de Compiègne, France Ph.D. Thesis - Abstract - DYNAMIC ADAPTIVE HYPERMEDIA SYSTEMS FOR E-LEARNING Elvira POPESCU Advisors: Prof. Vladimir RĂSVAN
More informationInnovative Methods for Teaching Engineering Courses
Innovative Methods for Teaching Engineering Courses KR Chowdhary Former Professor & Head Department of Computer Science and Engineering MBM Engineering College, Jodhpur Present: Director, JIETSETG Email:
More informationAdaptive and Personalized Learning based on Students Characteristics
Adaptive and Personalized Learning based on Students Characteristics Sabine Graf sabineg@athabascau.ca Research Team: Muhammad Anwar (PhD student) Charles Jason Bernard (MSc student) Moushir El-Bishouty
More informationAQUA: An Ontology-Driven Question Answering System
AQUA: An Ontology-Driven Question Answering System Maria Vargas-Vera, Enrico Motta and John Domingue Knowledge Media Institute (KMI) The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, United Kingdom.
More informationModule 12. Machine Learning. Version 2 CSE IIT, Kharagpur
Module 12 Machine Learning 12.1 Instructional Objective The students should understand the concept of learning systems Students should learn about different aspects of a learning system Students should
More informationAuthoring of Learning Styles in Adaptive Hypermedia: Problems and Solutions
Authoring of Learning Styles in Adaptive Hypermedia: Problems and Solutions Natalia Stash Faculty of Computer Science and Mathematics Eindhoven University of Technology Postbus 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven,
More informationImproving the educational process by joining SCORM with adaptivity: the case of ProPer
Int. J. Technology Enhanced Learning, Vol. 4, Nos. 3/4, 2012 231 Improving the educational process by joining SCORM with adaptivity: the case of ProPer Ioannis Kazanidis* Kavala Institute of Technology,
More informationExperience and Innovation Factory: Adaptation of an Experience Factory Model for a Research and Development Laboratory
Experience and Innovation Factory: Adaptation of an Experience Factory Model for a Research and Development Laboratory Full Paper Attany Nathaly L. Araújo, Keli C.V.S. Borges, Sérgio Antônio Andrade de
More informationAdaptation Criteria for Preparing Learning Material for Adaptive Usage: Structured Content Analysis of Existing Systems. 1
Adaptation Criteria for Preparing Learning Material for Adaptive Usage: Structured Content Analysis of Existing Systems. 1 Stefan Thalmann Innsbruck University - School of Management, Information Systems,
More informationLearning and Teaching
Learning and Teaching Set Induction and Closure: Key Teaching Skills John Dallat March 2013 The best kind of teacher is one who helps you do what you couldn t do yourself, but doesn t do it for you (Child,
More informationPractice Examination IREB
IREB Examination Requirements Engineering Advanced Level Elicitation and Consolidation Practice Examination Questionnaire: Set_EN_2013_Public_1.2 Syllabus: Version 1.0 Passed Failed Total number of points
More informationAn Interactive Intelligent Language Tutor Over The Internet
An Interactive Intelligent Language Tutor Over The Internet Trude Heift Linguistics Department and Language Learning Centre Simon Fraser University, B.C. Canada V5A1S6 E-mail: heift@sfu.ca Abstract: This
More informationCREATING SHARABLE LEARNING OBJECTS FROM EXISTING DIGITAL COURSE CONTENT
CREATING SHARABLE LEARNING OBJECTS FROM EXISTING DIGITAL COURSE CONTENT Rajendra G. Singh Margaret Bernard Ross Gardler rajsingh@tstt.net.tt mbernard@fsa.uwi.tt rgardler@saafe.org Department of Mathematics
More informationA student diagnosing and evaluation system for laboratory-based academic exercises
A student diagnosing and evaluation system for laboratory-based academic exercises Maria Samarakou, Emmanouil Fylladitakis and Pantelis Prentakis Technological Educational Institute (T.E.I.) of Athens
More informationAGENDA LEARNING THEORIES LEARNING THEORIES. Advanced Learning Theories 2/22/2016
AGENDA Advanced Learning Theories Alejandra J. Magana, Ph.D. admagana@purdue.edu Introduction to Learning Theories Role of Learning Theories and Frameworks Learning Design Research Design Dual Coding Theory
More informationEvaluation of Learning Management System software. Part II of LMS Evaluation
Version DRAFT 1.0 Evaluation of Learning Management System software Author: Richard Wyles Date: 1 August 2003 Part II of LMS Evaluation Open Source e-learning Environment and Community Platform Project
More informationAn adaptive and personalized open source e-learning platform
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 9 (2010) 38 43 WCLTA 2010 An adaptive and personalized open source e-learning platform Dimitrios Tsolis a *, Sofia Stamou
More informationIBM Software Group. Mastering Requirements Management with Use Cases Module 6: Define the System
IBM Software Group Mastering Requirements Management with Use Cases Module 6: Define the System 1 Objectives Define a product feature. Refine the Vision document. Write product position statement. Identify
More informationThe Impact of the Multi-sensory Program Alfabeto on the Development of Literacy Skills of Third Stage Pre-school Children
The Impact of the Multi-sensory Program Alfabeto on the Development of Literacy Skills of Third Stage Pre-school Children Betina von Staa 1, Loureni Reis 1, and Matilde Conceição Lescano Scandola 2 1 Positivo
More informationEvaluation of Usage Patterns for Web-based Educational Systems using Web Mining
Evaluation of Usage Patterns for Web-based Educational Systems using Web Mining Dave Donnellan, School of Computer Applications Dublin City University Dublin 9 Ireland daviddonnellan@eircom.net Claus Pahl
More informationEvaluation of Usage Patterns for Web-based Educational Systems using Web Mining
Evaluation of Usage Patterns for Web-based Educational Systems using Web Mining Dave Donnellan, School of Computer Applications Dublin City University Dublin 9 Ireland daviddonnellan@eircom.net Claus Pahl
More informationReinforcement Learning by Comparing Immediate Reward
Reinforcement Learning by Comparing Immediate Reward Punit Pandey DeepshikhaPandey Dr. Shishir Kumar Abstract This paper introduces an approach to Reinforcement Learning Algorithm by comparing their immediate
More informationUCEAS: User-centred Evaluations of Adaptive Systems
UCEAS: User-centred Evaluations of Adaptive Systems Catherine Mulwa, Séamus Lawless, Mary Sharp, Vincent Wade Knowledge and Data Engineering Group School of Computer Science and Statistics Trinity College,
More informationComputers in Human Behavior
Computers in Human Behavior 26 (2010) 581 591 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Computers in Human Behavior journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/comphumbeh A fully personalization strategy
More informationEXPO MILANO CALL Best Sustainable Development Practices for Food Security
EXPO MILANO 2015 CALL Best Sustainable Development Practices for Food Security Prospectus Online Application Form Storytelling has played a fundamental role in the transmission of knowledge since ancient
More informationA Case Study: News Classification Based on Term Frequency
A Case Study: News Classification Based on Term Frequency Petr Kroha Faculty of Computer Science University of Technology 09107 Chemnitz Germany kroha@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de Ricardo Baeza-Yates Center
More informationWELLCOME 2
Guide to Services WELLCOME 2 INDEX Who we are? Consultancy Training, classroom and blended learning Platforms Content Creation And other complementary services Customers who have believed in us Agreements
More informationModeling user preferences and norms in context-aware systems
Modeling user preferences and norms in context-aware systems Jonas Nilsson, Cecilia Lindmark Jonas Nilsson, Cecilia Lindmark VT 2016 Bachelor's thesis for Computer Science, 15 hp Supervisor: Juan Carlos
More informationRecommending Collaboratively Generated Knowledge
DOI: 10.2298/CSIS111129017C Recommending Collaboratively Generated Knowledge Weiqin Chen 1,2 and Richard Persen 1 1 Department of Information Science and Media Studies, University of Bergen, POB 7802,
More informationAccelerated Learning Course Outline
Accelerated Learning Course Outline Course Description The purpose of this course is to make the advances in the field of brain research more accessible to educators. The techniques and strategies of Accelerated
More informationP. Belsis, C. Sgouropoulou, K. Sfikas, G. Pantziou, C. Skourlas, J. Varnas
Exploiting Distance Learning Methods and Multimediaenhanced instructional content to support IT Curricula in Greek Technological Educational Institutes P. Belsis, C. Sgouropoulou, K. Sfikas, G. Pantziou,
More informationLearning Methods for Fuzzy Systems
Learning Methods for Fuzzy Systems Rudolf Kruse and Andreas Nürnberger Department of Computer Science, University of Magdeburg Universitätsplatz, D-396 Magdeburg, Germany Phone : +49.39.67.876, Fax : +49.39.67.8
More informationE-Teaching Materials as the Means to Improve Humanities Teaching Proficiency in the Context of Education Informatization
International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2016, 11(4), 433-442 E-Teaching Materials as the Means to Improve Humanities Teaching Proficiency in the Context of Education Informatization
More informationE-Learning project in GIS education
E-Learning project in GIS education MARIA KOULI (1), DIMITRIS ALEXAKIS (1), FILIPPOS VALLIANATOS (1) (1) Department of Natural Resources & Environment Technological Educational Institute of Grete Romanou
More informationProposal of Pattern Recognition as a necessary and sufficient principle to Cognitive Science
Proposal of Pattern Recognition as a necessary and sufficient principle to Cognitive Science Gilberto de Paiva Sao Paulo Brazil (May 2011) gilbertodpaiva@gmail.com Abstract. Despite the prevalence of the
More informationThe 9 th International Scientific Conference elearning and software for Education Bucharest, April 25-26, / X
The 9 th International Scientific Conference elearning and software for Education Bucharest, April 25-26, 2013 10.12753/2066-026X-13-154 DATA MINING SOLUTIONS FOR DETERMINING STUDENT'S PROFILE Adela BÂRA,
More informationImplementing a tool to Support KAOS-Beta Process Model Using EPF
Implementing a tool to Support KAOS-Beta Process Model Using EPF Malihe Tabatabaie Malihe.Tabatabaie@cs.york.ac.uk Department of Computer Science The University of York United Kingdom Eclipse Process Framework
More informationBlended E-learning in the Architectural Design Studio
Blended E-learning in the Architectural Design Studio An Experimental Model Mohammed F. M. Mohammed Associate Professor, Architecture Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt (Associate Professor, Architecture
More informationSIMULATION CENTER AND NURSING RESOURCE LABORATORY
SIMULATION CENTER AND NURSING RESOURCE LABORATORY AWARDED ACCREDITATION 2014-2019 SIMULATION DESIGN BEST PRACTICES LEARNER CENTERED OBJECTIVES COLLABORATION QUALITY AND SAFETY CONFIDENCE AND COMPETENCY
More informationOn the Combined Behavior of Autonomous Resource Management Agents
On the Combined Behavior of Autonomous Resource Management Agents Siri Fagernes 1 and Alva L. Couch 2 1 Faculty of Engineering Oslo University College Oslo, Norway siri.fagernes@iu.hio.no 2 Computer Science
More informationPhD project description. <Working title of the dissertation>
PhD project description PhD student: University of Agder (UiA) Faculty of Engineering and Science Department
More informationDeveloping a Language for Assessing Creativity: a taxonomy to support student learning and assessment
Investigations in university teaching and learning vol. 5 (1) autumn 2008 ISSN 1740-5106 Developing a Language for Assessing Creativity: a taxonomy to support student learning and assessment Janette Harris
More informationINPE São José dos Campos
INPE-5479 PRE/1778 MONLINEAR ASPECTS OF DATA INTEGRATION FOR LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION IN A NEDRAL NETWORK ENVIRONNENT Maria Suelena S. Barros Valter Rodrigues INPE São José dos Campos 1993 SECRETARIA
More informationE-Learning Based Teaching Material for Calculus in Engineer Training
E-Learning Based Teaching Material for Calculus in Engineer Training Gizella Csikós Pajor*, Albert Boros** Viša Tehnička Škola Polytechnical Engeneering College Subotica Marka Oreskovica 16., 24000 Subotica
More informationChapter 1 Analyzing Learner Characteristics and Courses Based on Cognitive Abilities, Learning Styles, and Context
Chapter 1 Analyzing Learner Characteristics and Courses Based on Cognitive Abilities, Learning Styles, and Context Moushir M. El-Bishouty, Ting-Wen Chang, Renan Lima, Mohamed B. Thaha, Kinshuk and Sabine
More informationOCR for Arabic using SIFT Descriptors With Online Failure Prediction
OCR for Arabic using SIFT Descriptors With Online Failure Prediction Andrey Stolyarenko, Nachum Dershowitz The Blavatnik School of Computer Science Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, Israel Email: stloyare@tau.ac.il,
More informationCOMPUTER-ASSISTED INDEPENDENT STUDY IN MULTIVARIATE CALCULUS
COMPUTER-ASSISTED INDEPENDENT STUDY IN MULTIVARIATE CALCULUS L. Descalço 1, Paula Carvalho 1, J.P. Cruz 1, Paula Oliveira 1, Dina Seabra 2 1 Departamento de Matemática, Universidade de Aveiro (PORTUGAL)
More informationMath-U-See Correlation with the Common Core State Standards for Mathematical Content for Third Grade
Math-U-See Correlation with the Common Core State Standards for Mathematical Content for Third Grade The third grade standards primarily address multiplication and division, which are covered in Math-U-See
More informationChamilo 2.0: A Second Generation Open Source E-learning and Collaboration Platform
Chamilo 2.0: A Second Generation Open Source E-learning and Collaboration Platform doi:10.3991/ijac.v3i3.1364 Jean-Marie Maes University College Ghent, Ghent, Belgium Abstract Dokeos used to be one of
More informationCognitive Thinking Style Sample Report
Cognitive Thinking Style Sample Report Goldisc Limited Authorised Agent for IML, PeopleKeys & StudentKeys DISC Profiles Online Reports Training Courses Consultations sales@goldisc.co.uk Telephone: +44
More informationPROGRAMME SPECIFICATION
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION 1 Awarding Institution Newcastle University 2 Teaching Institution Newcastle University 3 Final Award MSc 4 Programme Title Digital Architecture 5 UCAS/Programme Code 5112 6 Programme
More informationGuidelines on how to use the Learning Agreement for Studies
Guidelines on how to use the Learning The purpose of the Learning Agreement is to provide a transparent and efficient preparation of the study period abroad and to ensure that the student will receive
More informationEvaluating Collaboration and Core Competence in a Virtual Enterprise
PsychNology Journal, 2003 Volume 1, Number 4, 391-399 Evaluating Collaboration and Core Competence in a Virtual Enterprise Rainer Breite and Hannu Vanharanta Tampere University of Technology, Pori, Finland
More informationDesigning e-learning materials with learning objects
Maja Stracenski, M.S. (e-mail: maja.stracenski@zg.htnet.hr) Goran Hudec, Ph. D. (e-mail: ghudec@ttf.hr) Ivana Salopek, B.S. (e-mail: ivana.salopek@ttf.hr) Tekstilno tehnološki fakultet Prilaz baruna Filipovica
More informationWord Segmentation of Off-line Handwritten Documents
Word Segmentation of Off-line Handwritten Documents Chen Huang and Sargur N. Srihari {chuang5, srihari}@cedar.buffalo.edu Center of Excellence for Document Analysis and Recognition (CEDAR), Department
More informationPUBLIC CASE REPORT Use of the GeoGebra software at upper secondary school
PUBLIC CASE REPORT Use of the GeoGebra software at upper secondary school Linked to the pedagogical activity: Use of the GeoGebra software at upper secondary school Written by: Philippe Leclère, Cyrille
More informationAn Automated Data Fusion Process for an Air Defense Scenario
16 th ICCRTS 2011, June An Automated Data Fusion Process for an Air Defense Scenario André Luís Maia Baruffaldi [andre_baruffaldi@yahoo.com.br] José Maria P. de Oliveira [parente@ita.br] Alexandre de Barros
More informationA cognitive perspective on pair programming
Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) AMCIS 2006 Proceedings Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) December 2006 A cognitive perspective on pair programming Radhika
More informationAnalyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs
Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs 2016 Dual Language Conference: Making Connections Between Policy and Practice March 19, 2016 Framingham, MA Session Description
More informationRobot manipulations and development of spatial imagery
Robot manipulations and development of spatial imagery Author: Igor M. Verner, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 32000, ISRAEL ttrigor@tx.technion.ac.il Abstract This paper considers spatial
More informationSpecification and Evaluation of Machine Translation Toy Systems - Criteria for laboratory assignments
Specification and Evaluation of Machine Translation Toy Systems - Criteria for laboratory assignments Cristina Vertan, Walther v. Hahn University of Hamburg, Natural Language Systems Division Hamburg,
More informationThe Learning Model S2P: a formal and a personal dimension
The Learning Model S2P: a formal and a personal dimension Salah Eddine BAHJI, Youssef LEFDAOUI, and Jamila EL ALAMI Abstract The S2P Learning Model was originally designed to try to understand the Game-based
More informationAccelerated Learning Online. Course Outline
Accelerated Learning Online Course Outline Course Description The purpose of this course is to make the advances in the field of brain research more accessible to educators. The techniques and strategies
More informationCOURSE GUIDE: PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT
1 COURSE GUIDE: UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE VALENCIA SAN VICENTE MÁRTIR PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT Teaching Guide FOUNDATIONS OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT 2 COURSE GUIDE TO PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT ECTS MODULE: Business
More informationAUTHORING E-LEARNING CONTENT TRENDS AND SOLUTIONS
AUTHORING E-LEARNING CONTENT TRENDS AND SOLUTIONS Danail Dochev 1, Radoslav Pavlov 2 1 Institute of Information Technologies Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Bulgaria, Sofia 1113, Acad. Bonchev str., Bl.
More informationApplications of memory-based natural language processing
Applications of memory-based natural language processing Antal van den Bosch and Roser Morante ILK Research Group Tilburg University Prague, June 24, 2007 Current ILK members Principal investigator: Antal
More informationEvolutive Neural Net Fuzzy Filtering: Basic Description
Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications, 2010, 2: 12-18 doi:10.4236/jilsa.2010.21002 Published Online February 2010 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/jilsa) Evolutive Neural Net Fuzzy Filtering:
More informationEQuIP Review Feedback
EQuIP Review Feedback Lesson/Unit Name: On the Rainy River and The Red Convertible (Module 4, Unit 1) Content Area: English language arts Grade Level: 11 Dimension I Alignment to the Depth of the CCSS
More informationCOMMUNICATING EFFECTIVELY WITH YOUR INSTRUCTOR
COMMUNICATING EFFECTIVELY WITH YOUR INSTRUCTOR Presented by: Dr. Lana Myers & Dr. Lori Hughes 1/30/2014 The Write Place, Building G, Room 103 1 PRESENTATION OUTLINE Introduction Email activity Ways to
More informationMSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION
MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION Overview of the Policy, Planning, and Administration Concentration Policy, Planning, and Administration Concentration Goals and Objectives Policy,
More informationExecution Plan for Software Engineering Education in Taiwan
2012 19th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference Execution Plan for Software Engineering Education in Taiwan Jonathan Lee 1, Alan Liu 2, Yu Chin Cheng 3, Shang-Pin Ma 4, and Shin-Jie Lee 1 1 Department
More informationSuccess Factors for Creativity Workshops in RE
Success Factors for Creativity s in RE Sebastian Adam, Marcus Trapp Fraunhofer IESE Fraunhofer-Platz 1, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany {sebastian.adam, marcus.trapp}@iese.fraunhofer.de Abstract. In today
More informationGACE Computer Science Assessment Test at a Glance
GACE Computer Science Assessment Test at a Glance Updated May 2017 See the GACE Computer Science Assessment Study Companion for practice questions and preparation resources. Assessment Name Computer Science
More informationUSING LEARNING THEORY IN A HYPERMEDIA-BASED PETRI NET MODELING TUTORIAL
USING LEARNING THEORY IN A HYPERMEDIA-BASED PETRI NET MODELING TUTORIAL A Paper Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science By Vaibhav Kumar
More informationActivities, Exercises, Assignments Copyright 2009 Cem Kaner 1
Patterns of activities, iti exercises and assignments Workshop on Teaching Software Testing January 31, 2009 Cem Kaner, J.D., Ph.D. kaner@kaner.com Professor of Software Engineering Florida Institute of
More informationMatch or Mismatch Between Learning Styles of Prep-Class EFL Students and EFL Teachers
http://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/ Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching 2015, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 276 288 Centre for Language Studies National University of Singapore Match or Mismatch Between Learning
More informationNotes on The Sciences of the Artificial Adapted from a shorter document written for course (Deciding What to Design) 1
Notes on The Sciences of the Artificial Adapted from a shorter document written for course 17-652 (Deciding What to Design) 1 Ali Almossawi December 29, 2005 1 Introduction The Sciences of the Artificial
More informationEOSC Governance Development Forum 4 May 2017 Per Öster
EOSC Governance Development Forum 4 May 2017 Per Öster per.oster@csc.fi Governance Development Forum Enable stakeholders to contribute to the governance development A platform for information, dialogue,
More informationCONCEPT MAPS AS A DEVICE FOR LEARNING DATABASE CONCEPTS
CONCEPT MAPS AS A DEVICE FOR LEARNING DATABASE CONCEPTS Pirjo Moen Department of Computer Science P.O. Box 68 FI-00014 University of Helsinki pirjo.moen@cs.helsinki.fi http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/pirjo.moen
More informationInformation Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education
Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education Approved by the Board of Directors of the Association of College and Research Libraries on January 18, 2000 Endorsed by the American Association
More informationAn Open Framework for Integrated Qualification Management Portals
An Open Framework for Integrated Qualification Management Portals Michael Fuchs, Claudio Muscogiuri, Claudia Niederée, Matthias Hemmje FhG IPSI D-64293 Darmstadt, Germany {fuchs,musco,niederee,hemmje}@ipsi.fhg.de
More informationDocument number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering
Document number: 2013/0006139 Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering Program Learning Outcomes Threshold Learning Outcomes for Engineering
More informationDOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL Overview of the Doctor of Philosophy Board The Doctor of Philosophy Board (DPB) is a standing committee of the Johns Hopkins University that reports
More informationPRODUCT COMPLEXITY: A NEW MODELLING COURSE IN THE INDUSTRIAL DESIGN PROGRAM AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND PRODUCT DESIGN EDUCATION 6 & 7 SEPTEMBER 2012, ARTESIS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, ANTWERP, BELGIUM PRODUCT COMPLEXITY: A NEW MODELLING COURSE IN THE INDUSTRIAL DESIGN
More informationE-learning Strategies to Support Databases Courses: a Case Study
E-learning Strategies to Support Databases Courses: a Case Study Luisa M. Regueras 1, Elena Verdú 1, María J. Verdú 1, María Á. Pérez 1, and Juan P. de Castro 1 1 University of Valladolid, School of Telecommunications
More informationOPTIMIZATINON OF TRAINING SETS FOR HEBBIAN-LEARNING- BASED CLASSIFIERS
OPTIMIZATINON OF TRAINING SETS FOR HEBBIAN-LEARNING- BASED CLASSIFIERS Václav Kocian, Eva Volná, Michal Janošek, Martin Kotyrba University of Ostrava Department of Informatics and Computers Dvořákova 7,
More informationWHAT DOES IT REALLY MEAN TO PAY ATTENTION?
WHAT DOES IT REALLY MEAN TO PAY ATTENTION? WHAT REALLY WORKS CONFERENCE CSUN CENTER FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING MARCH 22, 2013 Kathy Spielman and Dorothee Chadda Special Education Specialists Agenda Students
More informationMSc Education and Training for Development
MSc Education and Training for Development Awarding Institution: The University of Reading Teaching Institution: The University of Reading Faculty of Life Sciences Programme length: 6 month Postgraduate
More informationPatterns for Adaptive Web-based Educational Systems
Patterns for Adaptive Web-based Educational Systems Aimilia Tzanavari, Paris Avgeriou and Dimitrios Vogiatzis University of Cyprus Department of Computer Science 75 Kallipoleos St, P.O. Box 20537, CY-1678
More informationKnowledge Elicitation Tool Classification. Janet E. Burge. Artificial Intelligence Research Group. Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Page 1 of 28 Knowledge Elicitation Tool Classification Janet E. Burge Artificial Intelligence Research Group Worcester Polytechnic Institute Knowledge Elicitation Methods * KE Methods by Interaction Type
More informationEmpowering Students Learning Achievement Through Project-Based Learning As Perceived By Electrical Instructors And Students
Edith Cowan University Research Online EDU-COM International Conference Conferences, Symposia and Campus Events 2006 Empowering Students Learning Achievement Through Project-Based Learning As Perceived
More informationKelli Allen. Vicki Nieter. Jeanna Scheve. Foreword by Gregory J. Kaiser
Kelli Allen Jeanna Scheve Vicki Nieter Foreword by Gregory J. Kaiser Table of Contents Foreword........................................... 7 Introduction........................................ 9 Learning
More informationMultimedia Courseware of Road Safety Education for Secondary School Students
Multimedia Courseware of Road Safety Education for Secondary School Students Hanis Salwani, O 1 and Sobihatun ur, A.S 2 1 Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia, hanisalwani89@hotmail.com 2 Universiti Utara
More informationEDUC-E328 Science in the Elementary Schools
1 INDIANA UNIVERSITY NORTHWEST School of Education EDUC-E328 Science in the Elementary Schools Time: Monday 9 a.m. to 3:45 Place: Instructor: Matthew Benus, Ph.D. Office: Hawthorn Hall 337 E-mail: mbenus@iun.edu
More informationStrategy for teaching communication skills in dentistry
Strategy for teaching communication in dentistry SADJ July 2010, Vol 65 No 6 p260 - p265 Prof. JG White: Head: Department of Dental Management Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Pretoria, E-mail:
More information