ICES ITEM CATALOG GENERAL OPERATION OF ICES

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "ICES ITEM CATALOG GENERAL OPERATION OF ICES"

Transcription

1 Instructor and Course Evaluation System Center for Innovation in Teaching and Learning Measurement and Evaluation University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ICES ITEM CATALOG The Instructor and Course Evaluation System (ICES) is a computer-based system for obtaining student ratings of instructors and courses. With this system you select items or complete rating forms which you consider to be the most appropriate for evaluating your course. This catalog contains over 600 items and 4 complete forms for your use. GENERAL OPERATION OF ICES Each ICES questionnaire contains space for 25 items. The first two items are preprinted on each questionnaire. They are: 1. Rate the Instructor s Overall Exceptionally High Exceptionally Low Teaching Effectiveness 2. Rate the Overall Quality of Exceptionally High Exceptionally Low this Course These global items were selected to permit comparisons of ratings from nearly all teaching situations. The other 23 item spaces may be filled according to one of the three options described below. The two Global items above and all other items contain 5 response positions. Option 1: Departmental Core Plus Instructor Selected Items Each department has the option to designate a set of items (not necessarily contained in the catalog) to use as its departmental core. Once a core has been established, all instructors in that department will automatically have the department core items included as part of the 23 items printed by the computer on the ICES questionnaire. The number of items contained in a given core thus limits the number of instructor selected items that may be chosen. The total number of core plus instructor selected may not exceed 23. Option 2: Instructor Selected Items Only (No Departmental Core) If your department does not have a core set of items, you have the option of choosing up to 23 items from the catalog. Since you must request ICES questionnaires for each class section, you can select a different set of items for each section to be evaluated. Option 3: Complete Form If your department does not have a set of core items and you do not wish to use the catalog of Instructor Selected Items, you may select one of the available complete forms. Complete forms are ready-made questionnaires that either have been used at UIUC or were designed for a special purpose. Short descriptions of each form are given on page 27 of this catalog. If you choose this option, you cannot also use Instructor Selected Items. 2001, University of Illinois

2 HOW TO USE ICES You will need a copy of this ICES Catalog and, for every class section to be evaluated, a machine-scannable Faculty Request Form. Additional Faculty Request Forms are available in your departmental office. Remember: a separate Faculty Request Form should be completed for each class section. Steps to follow in Completing a Faculty Request Form 1. Complete Boxes 1-11 on Side 1 as indicated. In the machine-scannable areas, fill in the requested letters or numbers and darken the appropriate circle beneath each letter or number. In other areas, supply the information requested. Please use pencil only. 2. Since norms are partially based on instructor rank, make sure Box 6 is completed. 3. Box 7, Release Information, includes three separate designations a. Incomplete List of Teachers allows your name and course to be published if results qualify Mark Yes for release, no signature required. b. University Student Publication allows an additional set of items to be printed on your questionnaire forms and for results to be printed in their publication Mark Yes for release, no signature required. Check your general mailing for the exact number of items added. c. Department Head allows one copy of your results to be sent to a departmental representative Mark Yes for release and designate the person and his/her address and sign your name. 4. On Side 2, determine the appropriate option from the previous page that applies to each request form. a. Option 1 (Department Core Plus Instructor-Selected Items) Use the catalog to select the items you wish to use (see next section for some suggestions) and record the item numbers on a separate sheet of paper. This separate sheet will allow you to keep a record of the items you requested for each class. Note that the number of items selected, including those in your departmental core, may not exceed 23. Mark the item numbers on Side 2 of the Faculty Request Form by darkening the circle under each catalog item number. b. Option 2 (Instructor-Selected Items Only) Use the catalog to select the items you wish to use (see next section for some suggestions) and record the item numbers on a separate sheet of paper. This separate sheet will allow you to keep a record of the items you requested for each class. Mark the item numbers on Side 2 of the Faculty Request Form by darkening the circle under each catalog item number c. Option 3 (Complete Form) Select the form you wish to use from the summaries contained on page 27. Then darken the circle next to form number in the Complete Forms section on Side 2 of the Faculty Request Form. 5. Return your completed Faculty Request Forms to ICES, 247 Armory Bldg., MC-528 and keep this catalog for future reference. SOME SUGGESTIONS FOR CHOOSING INSTRUCTOR SELECTED ITEMS The items in the catalog are initially classified by item content. Roman numeral sections I-IV in the table of contents contain items appropriate for most typical classes. Section V is to be used at the beginning of the semester. Section VI items can be used in Specific Instructional settings. Sections I-V are further divided into General or Specific items. General items indicate a given area of instruction as a strength or weakness and Specific items provide diagnostic information. The distinction between General and Specific items is primarily a judgmental decision. In using Instructor Selected Items for the first time, you may want to select one or two General items from each of several content areas of special interest to you. As space permits, one or two Specific items from the selected content areas might be added. As you gain experience with ICES, you may wish to explore a given instructional area in more depth by including more Specific items. More information on choosing items and using ICES may be found in ICES Newsletter No. 3. Please call the ICES staff at for any assistance.

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS INSTRUCTOR SELECTED ITEMS PAGE I. Course Management 4 A. Course Organization/Structure 4 B. Instructional Assignments and Materials 5 1. Readings 5 2. Writing 6 3. Homework 6 4. Audio Visual 7 C. Grading and Exams 7 D. Workload 8 1. Work Requirements 8 2. Difficulty 8 II. Student Outcomes of Instruction 9 A. Cognitive 9 B. Affective 10 C. Participation and Effort 11 III. Instructor Characteristics and Style 12 A. Communication Skills Enthusiastic/Dynamic Knowledgeable Clarity of Presentation Personality 14 B. Stimulation of Thinking 15 C. Warmth and Concern for Students 16 IV. Instructional Environment 17 A. Social Climate Instructor-Student Interaction Student-Student Interaction Active Learning 18 B. Physical Setting 19 V. Student Preferences for Instruction/Learning Style 20 VI. Specific Instructional Settings 21 A. Laboratory 21 B. Studio Art Organizational Structure Course Demands Examples/Demonstrations Explanations/Presentations Criticisms Student-Instructor Relations Instructor Characteristics Outcomes Facilities 24 C. Technology Utilization 24 D. Team Teaching 24 E. Clinical 25 F. Field Trips 25 VII. Cheating 26 COMPLETE FORM DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARIES 27 ESSAY ITEM IDEAS 27 3

4 A. Course Organization/Structure General I. Course Management 1 THE COURSE OBJECTIVES WERE: VERY CLEAR VERY UNCLEAR 2 THE INSTRUCTOR STATED CLEARLY WHAT WAS ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER EXPECTED OF STUDENTS. 3 THE COURSE WAS: ORGANIZED DISORGANIZED 4 WAS THERE MENT BETWEEN ANNOUNCED STRONG NO MENT COURSE OBJECTIVES AND WHAT WAS TAUGHT? MENT 5 WAS THE PROGRESSION OF THE COURSE LOGICAL AND YES, ALWAYS NO, SELDOM COHERENT FROM BEGINNING TO END? 6 DID THIS COURSE DUPLICATE OTHER COURSES IN THIS CONSIDERABLY NOT AT ALL AREA? Specific 7 DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT TOPICS IN A LOGICAL YES, ALM OST NO, ALMOST SEQUENCE? ALWAYS NEVER 8 DID THE INSTRUCTOR FOLLOW A COURSE OUTLINE? YES, VERY MUCH NO, NOT AT ALL 9 HOW WELL DID THE INSTRUCTOR COORDINATE VERY WELL RATHER POORLY DIFFERENT ACTIVITIES OF THIS COURSE? 10 THIS COURSE WAS CREATIVELY PLANNED. STRON GLY STRONGLY DIS 11 WHAT WAS YOUR OPINION ABOUT THE OBJECTIVES WELL CHOSEN POORLY CHOSEN FOR THIS COURSE? 12 I WAS DISAPPOINTED WITH THE TOPICS EMPHASIZED STRON GLY STRONGLY IN THIS COURSE. DIS 13 WAS CLASS TIME SPENT ON UNIMPORTANT AND YES, OFTEN NO, NEVER IRRELEVANT MATERIAL? 14 THE INSTRUCTOR NEEDS TO SCHEDULE CLASS TIME STRON GLY STRONGLY BETTER. DIS 15 HOW WELL DID THE READING, LECTURES, AND BALANCED UNBALANCED DISCUSSIONS COVER ANNOUNCED OBJECTIVES? COVERAGE COVERAGE 16 THE COURSE STRUCK A GOOD BALANCE AMONG TO A GREAT NOT AT ALL READING, DISCUSSION AND WRITING. 17 DID THE INSTRUCTOR EXPLAIN SEQUENCE OF TOPICS KEPT ON WANDERED AND THEN KEEP THE COURSE ON TRACK? THE TRACK AIMLESSLY 18 THE SCOPE OF THIS COURSE WAS: TOO BROAD TOO NARROW 19 THE COURSE CONTENT WAS: TOO ADVANCED TOO ELEMENTARY 20 THE COURSE CONTENT WAS: TOO TOO APPLIED THEORETICAL 21 DID THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENT MATERIAL THAT WAS YES, OFTEN NO, SELDOM NOT COVERED IN OUTSIDE READINGS? D LECTUR S REPEAT MATERIAL COVERED BY THE YES, B 22 DI E UT TOO NO, TOO READINGS? OFTEN SELDOM 4

5 23 RELATIVE TO DISCUSSION TIME, THE AMOUNT OF TOO MUCH TOO LITTLE LECTURING WAS: 24 SHOULD MORE/LESS TIME BE PROVIDED TO REVIEW MUCH MORE MUCH LESS AND SYNTHESIZE COURSE MATERIAL? TIME TIME 25 THE INSTRUCTOR CHANGED APPROACHES WHEN THE STRON GLY STRONGLY OCCASION DEMANDED IT. DIS 26 I NEEDED MORE DIRECTION. STRON GLY STRONGLY DIS 27 THE INSTRUCTOR DESCRIBED AT THE BEGINNING OF ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER CLASS WHAT WAS PLANNED. 28 THE DISCUSSION TOPICS WERE: WELL CHOSEN POORLY CHOSEN 29 DID INSTRUCTOR OUTLINE THE PURPOSES AND YES, ALWAYS NO, NEVER CONTENT OF CLASSROOM DISCUSSIONS? 30 THE INSTRUCTOR DEFINED THE OBJECTIVES OF ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER DISCUSSION. 31 THE INSTRUCTOR DEFINED THE CONTENT OF ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER DISCUSSION. 32 CLASS DISCUSSION SEEMED TO LACK DIRECTION AND ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER PURPOSE. 33 HOW MUCH TIME WAS ALLOTTED TO CLASSROOM TOO MUCH TOO LITTLE QUESTIONING AND DISCUSSION? 34 ONE REAL STRENGTH OF THIS COURSE WAS CLASS STRON GLY STRONGLY DISCUSSION. DIS 36 IT TOOK TOO LONG FOR THIS COURSE TO GET GOING. STRON GLY STRONGLY DIS 37 THE INSTRUCTOR USED STUDENT CONTRIBUTIONS IN ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER DEVELOPING SUBSEQUENT CLASS SESSIONS. B. Instructional Assignments and Materials General 45 RATE THE TEXT(S) USED IN THIS COURSE. EXCELLENT POOR 46 HOW WOULD YOU RATE INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS EXCELLENT POOR USED IN THIS COURSE? 47 THE INSTRUCTOR GAVE ASSIGNMENTS THAT WERE ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER USEFUL FOR LEARNING SUBJECT MATTER. 48 THE INSTRUCTOR PROVIDED PRACTICE FOR ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER STUDENTS TO MASTER COURSE MATERIAL. Specific 1. Readings 50 WERE READINGS WELL SELECTED? YES, A LL VERY NO, ALL VERY GOOD POOR 51 DES CRIBE THE READING ASSIGNMENTS. INTERESTING, BORING, STIMULATING UNEXCITING 52 DID READINGS REQUIRE A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF NO, TOO NO, TOO SIMPLE TIME AND EFFORT? DEMANDING 53 THE AMOUNT OF READING HOMEWORK ASSIGNED BY EXCESSIVE NOT ENOUGH THE INSTRUCTOR WAS: 5

6 54 THE READINGS WERE: EXTREMEL Y EXTREMELY DIFFICULT EASY 55 WERE READING ASSIGNMENTS RELEVANT TO CLASS YES, ALWAYS NO, ALMOST PRESENTATIONS? NEVER 56 APPROPRIATE READING ASSIGNMENTS WERE GIVEN ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER FOR EACH SECTION OF THE COURSE. 57 DID SUPPLEMENTARY TEXT(S) HELP YO U EXPAND TO A GREAT NOT AT ALL YOUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE MATERIAL? 58 HOW DIFFICULT WAS IT TO GET ACCESS TO THE VERY EASY VERY DIFFICULT REFERENCE MATERIALS FOR THIS COURSE? 2. Writing 60 ADEQUATE TIME WAS PROVIDED FOR COMPLETING ALWAYS SELDOM ASSIGNMENTS. 61 DID YOUR INSTRUCTOR RELATE EXERCISES TO ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER INFORMATION GAINED ELSEWHERE? 62 W ERE THE WRITTEN ASSIGNMENTS (PAPERS, YES, QUITE NO, POORLY PROBLEM SETS, ETC.) CAREFULLY CHOSEN? CAREFULLY CHOSEN 63 DES CRIBE YOUR WRITTEN ASSIGNMENTS. INTERESTING, DULL, STIMULATING UNINSPIRING 64 WERE DIRECTIONS FOR WRITTEN ASSIGNMENTS YES, ALWAYS NO, NEVER CLEAR AND SPECIFIC? 65 COMPLETING WRITTEN ASSIGNMENTS WAS A GOOD STRON GLY STRONGLY USE OF MY TIME AND EFFORT. DIS 66 WHAT WAS THE TIME AND EFFORT REQUIRED FOR TOO LONG TOO SHORT WRITTEN ASSIGNMENTS? 67 I WAS GIVEN SUFFICIENT CREATIVE FREEDOM IN QUITE NOT ENOUGH WRITING PAPERS AND REPORTS. SUFFICIENT 68 THE INSTRUCTOR PERMITTED ENOUGH FREEDOM IN SUFFICIENT TOO STRICT CHOOSING TOPICS FOR PAPERS. FREEDOM 69 W ERE WRITTEN ASSIGNMENTS RELEVANT TO CLASS YES, QUITE NO, VERY PRESENTATIONS? RELEVANT IRRELEVANT 70 WERE WRITTEN ASSIGNMENTS GRADED FAIRLY? YES, QUITE NO, VERY FAIR UNFAIR 71 WERE WRITTEN ASSIGNMENTS RETURNED PROMPTLY? YES, ALWAYS NO, ALMOST NEVER 72 HAS YOUR ABILITY TO EXPRESS IDEAS IN WRITING YES, NO, NOT AT ALL BEEN STRENGTHENED? DEFINITELY 73 WERE THE TERM PAPERS VALUABLE IN RELATION TO HIGH VALUE NO VALUE THE COURSE OBJECTIVES? 74 TOO MUCH EMPHASIS WAS PLACED ON THE STRON GLY STRONGLY PROJECT(S). DIS 3. Homework 80 HOW BENEFICIA L WERE THE HOMEWORK VERY JUST BUSY ASSIGNMENTS? BENEFICIAL WORK 81 SHOULD MORE OR LESS HOMEWORK BE ASSIGNED FOR MUCH MORE MUCH LESS THIS COURSE? 82 HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENTS WERE: EXCE SSIVELY EXTREMELY LONG SHORT 6

7 83 THE HOMEWORK WAS: EXCESSIV ELY EXTREMELY DIFFICULT EASY 4. Audio/Visual 90 DID INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS APPEAR TO BE YES, ALWAYS NO, SELDOM CONSCIENTIOUSLY PREPARED OR CHOSEN? 91 INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS FOR THIS COURSE WERE: TOO TOO ADVANCED ELEMENTARY 92 WERE VIDEOTAPES/FILMS INTERESTING AND YES, ALWAYS NO, SELDOM STIMULATING? 93 WERE SLIDE PRESENTATIONS INTERESTING AND YES, ALWAYS NO, NEVER STIMULATING? 94 WERE INSTRUCTORS' SUPPLEMENTARY HANDOUTS, YES, EXTREMELY NO, NEARLY PROBLEM SETS, VALUABLE AS LEARNING AIDS? VALUABLE USELESS 95 AU DIO-VISUAL PROCEDURES WERE LOGICALLY STRON GLY STRONGLY INTEGRATED WITH THE REST OF THE COURSE. DIS 96 HOW MUCH EXPLANATION DID THE INSTRUCTOR TOO MUCH TOO LITTLE PROVIDE IN DISCUSSING SLIDES, FILMS, ETC.? 97 HOW RELEVANT WERE FILMS AND AUDIO-VISUAL VERY VERY MATERIALS TO COURSE OBJECTIVES? RELEVANT IRRELEVANT 98 HOW OFTEN DID YOU FALL ASLEEP OR DOZE WHEN ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER AUDIO-VISUAL MATERIAL WAS PRESENTED? C. Grading and Exams General 100 HOW EFFECTIVE WAS THE INSTRUCTOR IN PREPARING VERY VERY STUDENTS FOR EXAMS? EFFECTIVE INEFFECTIVE 101 THE GRADING PROCEDURES FOR THE COURSE WERE: VERY FAIR VERY UNFAIR 102 HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTOR'S EXCELLENT POOR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS? 103 HOW WELL DID EXAMINATION QUESTIONS R EFLECT WELL RELATED POORLY CONTENT AND EMPHASIS OF THE COURSE? RELATED 104 WAS THE GRADING SYSTEM FOR THE COURSE YES, VERY NO, NOT AT ALL EXPLAINED? WELL Specific 105 D ID THE INSTRUCTOR HAVE A REALISTIC DEFINITION YES, VERY NO, VERY OF EXCELLENT PERFORMANCE? REALISTIC UNREALISTIC 106 DID THE INSTRUCTOR SET TOO HIGH/LOW GRADING TOO HIGH TOO LOW STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS? 107 HOW WOULD YOU CHARACTERIZE THE INSTRUCTOR'S VERY VERY GRADING SYSTEM? OBJECTIVE SUBJECTIVE 108 THE AMOUNT OF GRADED FEEDBACK GIVEN TO ME QUITE NOT ENOUGH DURING THE COURSE WAS: ADEQUATE 109 WERE EXAMS, PAPERS, REPORTS RETURNED WITH ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER ERRORS EXPLAINED OR PERSONAL COMMENTS? 110 WERE REQUESTS FOR RE-GRADING OR REVIEW YES, ALM OST NO, ALMOST HANDLED FAIRLY? ALWAYS NEVER E INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED MY WORK IN A STRON 111 TH GLY STRONGLY MEANINGFUL AND CONSCIENTIOUS MANNER. DIS 7

8 112 DID YOU UNDERSTAND WHY YOU RECEIVED THE ALWAYS NEVER GRADES YOU DID ON PROJECTS? 113 EXAMS WERE PROMPTLY GRADED. YES, ALWAYS NO, NEVER 114 THE EXAMS REFLECTED IMPORTANT POINTS IN THE STRON GLY STRONGLY READING ASSIGNMENTS. DIS 115 WERE THE INSTRUCTOR'S TEST QUESTIONS THOUGHT DEFINITELY DEFINITELY NO PROVOKING? YES 116 DID THE EXAMS CHALLENGE YOU TO DO ORIGINAL YES, VERY NO, NOT THINKING? CHALLENGING CHALLENGING 118 WERE THERE "TRICK" OR TRITE QUESTIONS ON LOTS OF THEM FEW IF ANY TESTS? 119 WERE EXAM QUESTIONS WORDED CLEARLY? YES, V ERY NO, VERY CLEAR UNCLEAR 120 HOW MANY EXAMINATIONS WERE GIVEN? TOO MANY TOO FEW 121 HOW WAS THE LENGTH OF EXAMS FOR THE TIME TOO LONG TOO SHORT ALLOTTED? 122 HOW DIFFICULT WERE THE EXAMINATIONS? TOO DIFFICULT TOO EASY 123 I FOUND I COULD SCORE REASONABLY WELL ON EXAMS STRON GLY STRONGLY BY JUST CRAMMING. DIS 125 WERE EXAMS ADEQUATELY DISCUSSED UPON YES, NO, NOT ENOUGH RETURN? ADEQUATELY D. Workload 1. Work Requirements General 130 HOW MUCH WORK DID THIS COURSE REQUIRE? EXCESSIVE NOT ENOUGH AMOUNT 131 HOW APPROPRIATE WAS THE AMOUNT OF WORK VERY INAPPROPRIATE REQUIRED FOR THE CREDIT EARNED? APPROPRIATE Specific 132 THE INSTRUCTOR ATTEMPTED TO COVER TOO MUCH STRON GLY STRONGLY MATERIAL. DIS 133 HOW MUCH PERFECTION DID THE INSTRUCTOR TOO MUCH TOO LITTLE REQUIRE IN YOUR WORK? 134 HOW DEMANDING WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR WRITTEN VERY OVERLY ASSIGNMENT LENGTH, DUE DATES, ETC.? REASONABLE DEMANDING 135 THE AMOUNT OF OUTSIDE PREPARATION REQUIRED QUITE GREAT QUITE SMALL FOR THIS COURSE WAS: 136 QUALITY OF WORK WAS EMPHASIZED MORE THAN STRON GLY STRONGLY QUANTITY. DIS 137 THE INSTRUCTOR'S ASSUMPTION THAT STUDENTS STRON GLY STRONGLY COULD MASTER TECHNIQUES WAS CORRECT. DIS 2. Difficulty General 140 HOW DIFFICULT WAS THE COURSE MATERIAL? TOO DIFFICULT RATHER EASY 8

9 141 THE COURSE WAS: OVERLY TOO EASY DEMANDING 142 THE LEVEL OF DIFFICULTY OF THE COURSE MATERIAL STRON GLY STRONGLY WAS APPROPRIATE FOR ME. DIS Specific 143 WAS THE COURSE APPROPRIATE FOR YOUR VERY NOT AT ALL BACKGROUND (EXPERIENCE)? APPROPRIATE APPROPRIATE 144 DESCRIBE THE PACE OF THE COURSE. TOO FAST TOO SLOW 145 WHAT PACE DID THE INSTRUCTOR SET IN PRESENTING TOO FAST TOO SLOW THE MATERIAL? 146 HOW SUITABLE WAS THE PACE OF THE COURSE TOO SL OW, TOO TOO FAST, TOO (NUMBER OF TOPICS, DEPTH OF COVERAGE)? LITTLE MUCH 147 HOW SUITABLE WAS THE LEVEL OF THE COURSE TOO S LOW, TOO TOO FAST, TOO (SOPHISTICATION OF TOPICS AND/OR METHODS)? EASY MUCH 148 OTHER STUDENTS WERE MORE ADVANCED, SO I HAD STRON GLY STRONGLY TROUBLE KEEPING UP. DIS A. Cognitive General II. Student Outcomes of Instruction 157 COURSE SERVED TO BROADEN MY UNDERSTANDING OF YES, DEFINITELY NO, NOT AT ALL HUMAN THOUGHT AND ACHIEVEMENT. 159 COURSE APPROPRIATELY RECOGNIZES SCHOLARSHIP YES, DEFINITELY NO, NOT AT ALL ON THE SIGNIFICANCE OF WOMEN AND GENDER. 160 HOW MUCH DO YOU FEEL YOU HAVE ACCOMPLISHED IN A GREAT DEAL VERY LITTLE THIS COURSE? 161 COMPARED TO OTHER COURSES, HOW MUCH DID YOU MUCH MORE MUCH LESS LEARN IN THIS COURSE? 162 HOW MUCH HAVE YOU LEARNED IN THIS COURSE? A GREAT DEAL VERY LITTLE 163 I HAVE BECOME MORE COMPETENT IN THIS AREA DUE TO A GREAT NOT AT ALL TO THIS COURSE. 164 DO YOU FEEL COURSE OBJECTIVES WERE YES, TO A NO, NOT AT ALL ACCOMPLISHED? GREAT 165 W OULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS COURSE TO OTHER HIGHLY NOT STUDENTS? RECOMMEND RECOMMEND Specific 166 WAS THE COURSE WORTHWHILE IN TERMS OF VERY NOT AT ALL OBTAINING GENERAL KNOWLEDGE IN THE FIELD? WORTHWHILE WORTHWHILE 167 CAN ALL STUDENTS BENEFIT FROM THIS COURSE OR STUDENTS SPECIALIZED ONLY THOSE WITH SPECIALIZED GOALS? IN GENERAL ONLY 168 HOW MUCH FACTUAL MATERIAL DID YOU LEARN IN THIS A GREAT DEAL VERY LITTLE COURSE? 169 DID THIS COURSE IMPROVE YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF YES, NO, NOT MUCH CONCEPTS AND PRINCIPLES IN THIS FIELD? SIGNIFICANTLY 9

10 170 CAN YOU NOW IDENTIFY MAIN POINTS AND CENTRAL YES, CLEARLY NOT VERY WELL ISSUES IN THIS FIELD? 171 I OBTAINED KNOWLEDGE ON HOW TO LOCATE TO A GREAT NOT AT ALL APPROPRIATE INFORMATION. 172 I DEVELOPED THE ABILITY TO RECOGNIZE GOOD TO A GREAT NOT AT ALL ARGUMENTS IN THIS FIELD. 173 THE COURSE MATERIAL WAS TOO SUPERFICIAL TO BE TO A GREAT NOT AT ALL OF MUCH USE TO ME. 174 DID YOU IMPROVE YOUR ABILITY TO APPLY PRINCIPLES YES, NO, NOT MUCH IN NEW SITUATIONS? SIGNIFICANTLY 175 DI D YOU IMPROVE YOUR ABILITY TO COMMUNICATE YES, NO, NOT REALLY CLEARLY ABOUT THIS SUBJECT? SIGNIFICANTLY 176 DID YOU IMPROVE YOUR ABILITY TO SOLVE REAL YES, NO, NOT REALLY PROBLEMS IN THIS FIELD? SIGNIFICANTLY 177 THE INSTRUCTOR HELPED IMPROVE MY PROBLEM STRONGLY STRONGLY SOLVING ABILITIES. DIS 178 DID YOU IMPROVE YOUR ABILITY TO EVALUATE NEW YES, GREATLY NO, NOT REALLY WORKS IN THIS FIELD? 179 THIS COURSE GAVE ME THE OPPORTUNITY TO TO A GREAT NOT AT ALL DEVELOP SOME ORIGINAL IDEAS. 180 DID YOU IMPROVE YOUR ABILITY TO CARRY OUT YES, NO, NOT REALLY ORIGINAL RESEARCH IN THIS FIELD? SIGNIFICANTLY 181 HOW MUCH HAS THIS COURSE IMPROVED YOUR A GREAT NOT AT ALL AESTHETIC JUDGMENT? 182 HOW VALUABLE WAS THIS COURSE IN TERMS OF YOUR EXTREMELY NOT VALUABLE TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENT? VALUABLE 183 THE COURSE GAVE ME SKILLS AND TECHNIQUES STRONGLY STRONGLY DIRECTLY APPLICABLE TO MY CAREER. DIS 184 WAS THE COURSE, AS IT WAS GIVEN, WORTHWHILE IN VERY NOT AT ALL TERMS OF YOUR CAREER OBJECTIVES? WORTHWHILE WORTHWHILE 185 DID YOU LEARN MUCH ABOUT CAREER YES, QUITE A NO, NOT MUCH OPPORTUNITIES? LOT 186 HOW MUCH HAVE THE PROJECTS INCREASED YOUR A GREAT DEAL VERY LITTLE UNDERSTANDING OF CONCEPTS AND PRINCIPLES? 187 THIS COURSE INCREASED MY ABILITY TO SPEAK IN STRONGLY STRONGLY PUBLIC EFFECTIVELY. DIS 188. I GAINED SKILL DURING THIS COURSE TO HELP ME STRONGLY STRONGLY LEARN INDEPENDENTLY. DIS 189. THIS COURSE BROADENED MY PERSEPCTIVE OF STRONGLY STRONGLY WORKING IN A GLOBAL/SOCIETAL CONTEXT DIS B. Affective General 190 AS A RESULT OF THIS COURSE, I WANT TO TAKE MORE YES, NO, DEFINITELY COURSES IN THIS AREA. DEFINITELY NOT 191 DID THIS COURSE INCREASE YOUR INTEREST IN THE YES, GREATLY NO, NOT MUCH SUBJECT MATTER? 192 I ENJOYED LEARNING ABOUT THIS SUBJECT MATTER. TO A GREAT NOT AT ALL 193 I LOOKED FORWARD TO ATTENDING CLASS. ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER 10

11 194 DID THIS COURSE MAINTAIN YOUR ATTENTION ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER THROUGHOUT THE SEMESTER? Specific 195 DID YOUR INTEREST IN THIS COURSE INCREASE OR GREATLY GREATLY DECREASE AS THE SEMESTER PROGRESSED? INCREASED DECREASED 196 DO YOU FEEL YOUR EFFORTS IN THIS COURSE HAVE YES, VERY NO, NOT BEEN WORTHWHILE? WORTHWHILE WORTHWHILE 197 THIS SUBJECT MATTER WAS INTRINSICALLY BORING. STRON GLY STRONGLY DIS 198 DID YOU LEARN TO VALUE NEW VIEWPOINTS BECAUSE YES, NO, NOT REALLY OF THIS COURSE? DEFINITELY 199 WERE YOU STIMULATED TO DO EXTRA READING ABOUT YES, VERY NO, NOT REALLY THE COURSE MATERIAL? MUCH 200 WERE YOU STIMULATED TO DISCUSS RELATED TOPICS YES, OFTEN NO, NEVER WITH FRIENDS OUTSIDE OF CLASS? 201 THIS COURSE HELPED ME TO FULFILL SOME OF MY TO A GREAT NOT AT ALL PERSONAL GOALS. 202 DID YOU DEVELOP A CLEARER SENSE OF YES, MUCH NO, NOT REALLY PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FROM THIS COURSE? CLEARER 203 I FELT THIS COURSE HAD VALUE FOR ME AS A PERSON. STRON GLY STRONGLY DIS 204 I DEVELOPED A MORE POSITIVE SELF-CONCEPT TO A GREAT NOT AT ALL BECAUSE OF THIS COURSE. 205 DID THIS COURSE HELP YOU UNDERSTAND YOURSELF YES, HEL PED NO, NOT BETTER? GREATLY PARTICULARLY 206 THIS COURSE MADE ME MORE AWARE OF MY YES, MUCH NO, NOT REALLY INTERESTS AND TALENTS. MORE AWARE 207 DID YO U DEVELOP A SET OF OVERALL VALUES IN THIS DEFINITELY NO, NOT REALLY FIELD? YES 208 DID YOU BECOME INTERESTED IN COURSE-RELATED YES, VERY NO, NOT REALLY COMMUNITY PROJECTS? MUCH 209 I DEVELOPED SOME LEADERSHIP SKILLS BECAUSE OF TO A GREAT NOT AT ALL THIS COURSE DID YOU LEARN TO VALUE NEW VIEWPOINTS BECAUSE YES, NO, NOT AT ALL OF THIS COURSE? DEFINITELY 212. THIS COURSE INCREASED MY APPRECIATION OF STRONGLY STRONGLY CULTURAL AND ETHNIC DIFFERENCES. DIS 213. THIS COURSE INCREASED MY ABILITY TO UNDERSTAND STRONGLY STRONGLY VALUES AND ETHICAL STANDARDS. DIS C. Participation and Effort General 220 COMPARED TO OTHER COURSES, HOW MUCH EFFORT MUCH MORE MUCH LESS DID YOU PUT INTO THIS COURSE? 221 I PREPARED BEFORE COMING TO CLASS. ALWAYS NEVER 222 HOW VALUABLE DO YOU CONSIDER THIS COURSE? EXTREMELY NOT VALUABLE VALUABLE 223 RATE THE RELEVANCE OF COURSE CONTENT TO YOUR HIGHLY NOT RELEVANT MAJOR FIELD. RELEVANT 11

12 Specific 224 HOW OFTEN DID YOU DELAY STUDYING FOR THIS VERY OFTEN NEVER COURSE? 225 HOW OFTEN HAD YOU COMPLETED ASSIGNED READING ALWAYS NEVER BEFORE DISCUSSION IN CLASS? 226 I SKIPPED CLASS: VERY OFTEN NEVER 227 I COULDN'T GET INTO THIS COURSE BECAUSE OTHER STRON GLY STRONGLY THINGS KEPT ME BUSY. DIS 228 I WENT TO SLEEP IN CLASS: VERY OFTEN NEVER 229 I KEPT UP WITH THE WORK IN THIS COURSE. STRON GLY STRONGLY DIS 230 I SOUGHT HELP WHEN I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND THE ALWAYS NEVER MATERIAL. 231 I ACTIVELY PARTICIPATED IN COURSE-RELATED OFTEN SELDOM GROUP ACTIVITIES. 232 DID YOU ACTIVELY PARTICIPATE IN CLASS YES, OFTEN NO, NEVER DISCUSSIONS? 233 DID YOU READ NON-REQUIRED BOOKS OR OTHER YES, ALL NO, NONE MATERIALS SUGGESTED IN THE COURSE? 235 I HAD THE APPROPRIATE PREREQUISITE AND STRON GLY STRONGLY TECHNICAL SKILLS FOR THIS COURSE. DIS 236 I LEARNED MORE FROM THE READINGS THAN I DID FROM STRON GLY STRONGLY LECTURES AND CLASS DISCUSSIONS. DIS 237 THE LECTURE-DISCUSSION METHOD USED IN THIS ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER CLASS LEFT ME BORED. 238 THERE WAS NOT ENOUGH STUDENT PARTICIPATION STRON GLY STRONGLY FOR THIS TYPE OF COURSE. DIS A. Communication Skills General III. Instructor Characteristics and Style 240 THE INSTRUCTOR WAS A DYNAMIC TEACHER. YES, VERY NO, VERY DULL DYNAMIC 241 WAS THE INSTRUCTOR A GOOD SPEAKER? YES, V ERY NO, RATHER GOOD POOR 242 THE INSTRUCTOR'S KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT WAS: EXCELLENT POOR 243 WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ENTHUSIASTIC ABOUT VERY VERY TEACHING? ENTHUSIASTIC UNENTHUSIASTIC 244 HOW WOULD YOU CHARACTERIZE THE INSTRUCTOR'S EXCELLENT VERY POOR ABILITY TO EXPLAIN? 245 THE INSTRUCTOR WAS A GOOD CLASSROOM LEADER. STRON GLY STRONGLY DIS 246 DID THE INSTRUCTOR SEEM TO ENJOY TEACHING? YES, V ERY NO, ENJOYED IT MUCH LITTLE 247 HOW WOULD YOU CHARACTER IZE THE INSTRUCTOR'S BROAD AND PLAINLY COMMAND OF THE SUBJECT? ACCURATE DEFICIENT 12

13 248 THE INSTRUCTOR SEEMED WELL PREPARED FOR YES, ALWAYS NO, SELDOM CLASSES. 249 THE INSTRUCTOR WAS A MODEL TEACHER. STRON GLY STRONGLY DIS 250 THE INSTRUCTOR WAS A CREATIVE TEACHER. STRON GLY STRONGLY DIS Specific 1. Enthusiastic/Dynamic 255 HOW INTERESTING WERE THE INSTRUCTOR'S VERY RATHER BORING PRESENTATIONS? INTERESTING 256 DI D THE INSTRUCTOR MAKE GOOD USE OF EXAMPLES YES, VERY NO, SELDOM AND ILLUSTRATIONS? OFTEN 257 THE INSTRUCTOR EMPHASIZED IMPORTANT POINTS BY ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER RAISING VOICE, REPEATING, ETC. 258 THE INSTRUCTOR MADE EFFORTS TO SHOW THE ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER INTERESTING NATURE OF THE TOPICS. 259 IT WAS EASY TO HEAR AND UNDERSTAND THE ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER INSTRUCTOR. 260 THE INSTRUCTOR'S LECTURES SEEMED TO RAMBLE. ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER 261 THE INSTRUCTOR USED GESTURES WHILE TEACHING. ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER 262 HOW EFFECTIVE WAS THE INSTRUCTOR IN VERY NOT AT ALL PRESENTING MATERIAL IN LECTURES/DISCUSSIONS? EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE 263 THE INSTRUCTOR'S CLASSROOM LEADERSHIP ABILITY VERY RATHER WAS: EFFECTIVE INEFFECTIVE 264 THE INSTRUCTOR SPENT A GREAT DEAL OF TIME ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER MAKING A SMALL NUMBER OF POINTS. 265 TH E INSTRUCTOR MADE USE OF ALTERNATIVE ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER EXPLANATIONS WHEN NEEDED. 266 I WOULD LIKE TO ADOPT THIS INSTRUCTOR'S STRON GLY STRONGLY TEACHING STYLE. DIS 267 THE INSTRUCTOR USED HUMOR EFFECTIVELY. YES, OFTEN NO, SELDOM 268 WAS THE INSTRUCTOR EASILY FRUSTRATED? YES, V ERY NO, HARDLY OFTEN EVER 2. Knowledgeable 275 THE INSTRUCTOR WAS KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT STRON GLY STRONGLY ORIGINS OF CONCEPTS AND IDEAS. DIS 276 WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABLE TO GIVE REFERENCES YES, VERY NO, NOT ABLE FOR ADDITIONAL READING OR RESEARCH? ABLE 277 DID THE INSTRUCTOR INDICATE RELATIONSHIPS OF YES, Q UITE NO, HARDLY COURSE CONTENT TO RECENT DEVELOPMENTS? OFTEN EVER 278 THE INSTRUCTOR WAS CONSCIENTIOUS ABOUT STRONGLY STRONGLY HIS/HER INSTRUCTIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES. DIS 670 HOW HELPFUL DID YOU FIND THE T.A.? VERY NOT VERY HELPFUL HELPFUL 13

14 3. Clarity of Presentation 280 THE INSTRUCTOR'S PRESENTATIONS ALLOWED FOR ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER EASY NOTE TAKING. 281 THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENTED MATERIAL AT A LEVEL ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER APPROPRIATE FOR ME. 282 HOW OFTEN DID THE INSTRUCTOR DIGRESS DURING QUITE OFTEN ALMOST NEVER THE LECTURES? 283 WAS THE INSTRUCTOR'S USE OF BLACKBOARD AN D VERY HELPFUL CONFUSING, OTHER MATERIALS (HANDOUTS, ETC.) EFFECTIVE? INADEQUATE 284 THE INSTRUCTOR FOLLOWED AN OUTLINE DURING ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER CLASSROOM PRESENTATIONS. 285 THE INSTRUCTOR SUMMARIZED MATERIAL PRESENTED ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER IN EACH CLASS. 286 THE INSTRUCTOR'S PRESENTATION OF ABSTRACT VERY CLEAR VERY UNCLEAR IDEAS, CONCEPTS, AND THEORIES WAS: 287 THE CLASSROOM PROBLEMS WERE CLEARLY STRON GLY STRONGLY PRESENTED. DIS 288 HOW DIFFICULT WAS IT TO COPY WHAT THE VERY DIFFICULT VERY EASY INSTRUCTOR PUT ON THE BOARD? 289 THE INSTRUCTOR GENERALLY TALKED: TOO FAST TOO SLOW 290 WAS THE INSTRUCTOR ABLE TO EXPLAIN DIFFICULT ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER MATERIAL TO YOUR SATISFACTION? 291 THE INSTRUCTOR GAVE EXPLANATIONS/EXAMPLES STRON GLY STRONGLY THAT WERE CLEARLY TO THE POINT. DIS 292 THE MAIN POINTS OF LECTURES WERE CLEARLY ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER UNDERSTOOD. 293 THE INSTRUCTOR EXPLAINED NEW IDEAS BY OFTEN SELDOM RELATING THEM TO FAMILIAR CONCEPTS. 294 THE INSTRUCTOR BROKE DOWN COMPLEX TOPICS FOR OFTEN SELDOM EASIER EXPLANATION. 295 THE INSTRUCTOR WAS ABLE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER CLEARLY AND CONCISELY. 296 THE INSTRUCTOR EXPLAINED THE UNDERLYING ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER RATIONALE FOR PARTICULAR TECHNIQUES. 297 HOW MUCH DETAIL DID THE INSTRUCTOR PROVIDE IN TOO MUCH TOO LITTLE HIS/HER EXPLANATIONS? 298 HOW OFTEN DID THE INSTRUCTOR REVIEW MATERIAL? TOO MUCH NOT ENOUGH 299 THE INSTRUCTOR DID NOT SYNTHESIZE, INTEGRATE, STRON GLY STRONGLY OR SUMMARIZE EFFECTIVELY. DIS 300 THE INSTRUCTOR SPOKE IN A MONOTONE, RARELY ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER SHOWING EXPRESSION IN VOICE. 4. Personality 305 THE INSTRUCTOR LOOKED AT THE CLASS WHILE ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER SPEAKING. 306 DID THE INSTRUCTOR ARRIVE ON TIME? YES, ALWAYS NO, SELDOM 307 HOW OFTEN DID THE INSTRUCTOR'S PERSONALITY ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER INTERFERE WITH INSTRUCTION? 14

15 308 HOW MUCH SELF-CONFIDENCE DID THE INSTRUCTOR A GREAT DEAL VERY LITTLE DISPLAY? 309 THE INSTRUCTOR WAS DEMANDING OF STUDENTS. STRON GLY STRONGLY DIS 310 THE INSTRUCTOR TALKS TOO MUCH ABOUT STRON GLY STRONGLY HIMSELF/HERSELF. DIS 311 THE INSTRUCTOR HAD HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS. STRON GLY STRONGLY DIS 312 WAS THE INSTRUCTOR'S VOICE PLEASANT OR VERY VERY IRRITATING TO LISTEN TO? PLEASANT IRRITATING 313 THE INSTRUCTOR'S LACK OF FACILITY WITH ENGLISH STRON GLY STRONGLY HINDERED COMMUNICATION OF IDEAS. DIS 315 THE INSTRUCTOR WAS OPEN-MINDED. STRON GLY STRONGLY DIS 317 THE INSTRUCTOR EXHIBITED PROFESSIONAL DIGNITY ALMOST ALMOST NEVER AND BEARING IN THE CLASSROOM. ALWAYS 318 THE INSTRUCTOR MISSED CLASS OFTEN DUE TO YES, QUITE NO, NEVER NON-TEACHING RESPONSIBILITIES. OFTEN B. Stimulation of Thinking General 325 THE INSTRUCTOR MOTIVATED ME TO DO MY BEST ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER WORK. 326 THE INSTRUCTOR STIMULATED MY INTELLECTUAL ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER CURIOSITY. 327 THE INSTRUCTOR GAVE ADVICE ON HOW TO STUDY YES, OFTEN NO, NEVER FOR THE COURSE. Specific 328 DID THE INSTRUCTOR RAISE CHALLENGING QUESTIONS YES, OFTEN NO, SELDOM IN CLASS? 329 QUESTIONS PRESENTED TO THE CLASS TO GENERATE TOO SPECIFIC TOO VAGUE DISCUSSION WERE GENERALLY: 330 THE INSTRUCTOR INITIATED FRUITFUL AND RELEVANT ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER DISCUSSIONS. 331 THE INSTRUCTOR ASKED OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONS. ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER 332 THE INSTRUCTOR ENCOURAGED DEVELOPMENT OF STRON GLY STRONGLY NEW VIEWPOINTS AND APPRECIATIONS. DIS 333 THE INSTRUCTOR WAS RECEPTIVE TO DIFFERING YES, Q UITE NO, DIDN'T WANT VIEWPOINTS OR OPINIONS. OPEN THEM 334 THE INSTRUCTOR ENCOURAGED ME TO EXPRESS MY ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER OPINION OR EXPERIENCE. 335 DID THE INSTRUCTOR ENCOURAGE YOU TO DEVELOP DEFINITELY DEFINITELY NO YOUR IDEAS AND APPROACHES TO PROBLEMS? YES 337 THE INSTRUCTOR ENCOURAGED ME TO THINK FOR STRON GLY STRONGLY MYSELF. DIS 338 THIS COURSE ENHANCED MY CREATIVE ABILITIES. TO A GREAT NOT AT ALL 15

16 339 THE INSTRUCTOR POINTED OUT WHAT WAS ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER IMPORTANT TO LEARN IN EACH CLASS SESSION. 340 DID THE INSTRUCTOR SUGGEST SPECIFIC WAYS YES, NO, ALMOST STUDENTS COULD IMPROVE? FREQUENTLY NEVER 341 DURING PRESENTATIONS, DID THE INSTRUCTOR ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER CHECK ON STUDENTS' UNDERSTANDING? 342 HOW MUCH UNGRADED FEEDBACK (QUESTION PERIODS, MUCH MORE MUCH LESS SHORT QUIZZES) SHOULD HAVE BEEN GIVEN? 343 THE INSTRUCTOR EMPHASIZED LEARNING RATHER ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER THAN TESTS OR GRADES. C. Warmth and Concern for Students General 350 THE INSTRUCTOR WAS SENSITIVE TO STUDENT ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER NEEDS. 351 HOW PATIENT WAS THE INSTRUCTOR IN WORKING VERY PATIENT RATHER WITH YOU? IMPATIENT 352 DID THE INSTRUCTOR TREAT YOU WITH RESPECT? YES, ALWAYS NO, SELDOM 353 WHAT WAS THE INSTRUCTOR'S ATTITUDE; HOW DID FAIR AND UNFAIR, THE INSTRUCTOR DEAL WITH YOU? IMPARTIAL DISDAINFUL 354 THE INSTRUCTOR LISTENED ATTENTIVELY TO WHAT ALWAYS SELDOM CLASS MEMBERS HAD TO SAY. 355 THE INSTRUCTOR WAS SKILLFUL IN OBSERVING ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER STUDENT REACTIONS. 356 THE INSTRUCTOR WAS FAIR TO STUDENTS. OFTEN SELDOM 357 THE INSTRUCTOR SEEMED: LENIENT STRICT Specific 358 THE INSTRUCTOR COULD SENSE WHEN AN IDEA HAD STRON GLY STRONGLY NOT BEEN CLEAR TO ME. DIS 359 HOW OFTEN DID THE INSTRUCTOR UNDERSTAND YOUR ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? 360 WAS THE INSTRUCTOR WILLING TO SPEND EXTRA TIME VERY WILLING VERY UNWILLING WITH YOU? 361 HOW ACCESSIBLE WAS THE INSTRUCTOR FOR AVAILABLE NEVER STUDENT CONFERENCES ABOUT THE COURSE? REGULARLY AVAILABLE 362 THE INSTRUCTOR SEEMED TO SENSE WHEN STRON GLY STRONGLY STUDENTS DID NOT UNDERSTAND. DIS 363 THE INSTRUCTOR CORRECTED STUDENT ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER STATEMENTS WITHOUT FURTHER DISCUSSION. 364 DISCUSSION OF STUDENT ERRONEOUS STATEMENTS ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER WAS ENCOURAGED TO CORRECT THEM. 365 THE INSTRUCTOR RECOGNIZED STUDENTS' ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER DIFFICULTIES IN UNDERSTANDING NEW MATERIAL. 366 THE INSTRUCTOR THOR OUGHLY ANSWERED ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER STUDENTS' QUESTIONS. 367 HOW OFTEN DID THE INSTRUCTOR GIVE UP ON VERY OFTEN SELDOM STUDENTS WHEN THEY DIDN'T UNDERSTAND? 16

17 368 HOW OFTEN DID THE INSTRUCTOR SUBTLY DECLINE TO VERY OFTEN SELDOM HELP YOU ON YOUR PROBLEMS? 369 THE INSTRUCTOR PRAISED STUDENT BEHAVIOR. ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER 370 THE INSTRUCTOR PRA ISED ME WHEN I HAD DONE YES, ALWAYS NO, ALMOST PARTICULARLY WELL. NEVER 371 EVALUATIONS OF MY WOR K WERE MADE IN A ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER CONSTRUCTIVE MANNER. 372 WERE THE INSTRUCTOR'S CRIT ICISMS AND COMMENTS VERY HELPFUL NOT HELPFUL AT ABOUT YOUR WORK HELPFUL? ALL 373 THE INSTRUCTOR ACCEPTED CRITICISM AND VERY WELL RATHER POORLY SUGGESTIONS: 374 THE INSTRUCTOR MADE ME AFRAID TO MAKE STRON GLY STRONGLY MISTAKES. DIS 375 HOW MUCH CONFIDENCE DID THE INSTRUCTOR HAVE A GREAT DEAL VERY LITTLE IN YOU AS A STUDENT? 376 THE INSTRUCTOR RECOGNIZED STUDENTS' PROBLEMS ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER IN PERFORMING DIFFICULT MATERIAL. 377 DID THE INSTRUCTOR INTIMIDATE THE STUDENTS? YES, NO, NEVER FREQUENTLY 378 WAS THE INSTRUCTOR CYNICAL AND SARCASTIC? VERY CYNICAL NOT AT ALL CYNICAL 379 THE INSTRUCTOR WAS CONDESCENDING TOWARD STRON GLY STRONGLY STUDENTS. DIS 380 THE INSTRUCTOR VARIED THE TEMPO OF THE CLASS ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER TO SUIT CONTENT AND STUDENTS' NEEDS. 381 IN TERMS OF DIRECTION AND STRUCTURE OF THE FLEXIBLE RIGID COURSE, THE INSTRUCTOR WAS: 382 WAS A GOOD BALANCE OF STUDENT PARTICIPATION ALWAYS NEVER AND INSTRUCTOR CONTRIBUTION ACHIEVED? 383 THE INSTRUCTOR ASKED STUDENTS TO HELP IN ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER EVALUATING THEIR ACHIEVEMENT. A. Social Climate IV. Instructional Environment 1. Instructor-Student Interaction General 390 THERE WAS A POSITIVE INTERACTION BETWEEN ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER STUDENTS AND INSTRUCTOR. 391 THE ATMOSPHERE IN THE CLASSROOM SEEMED: RELAXED AND TENSE AND FRIENDLY UNFRIENDLY 392 THE INSTRUCTOR PROMOTED AN ATMOSPHERE STRON GLY STRONGLY CONDUCIVE TO WORK AND LEARNING. DIS 393 DESCRIBE YOUR INSTRUCTOR'S ATTITUDE TOWARD FRIENDLY UNFRIENDLY STUDENTS. Specific 394 HOW OFTEN DID THE INSTRUCTOR ALLOW TOO OFTEN NOT ENOUGH INTERACTION AMONG STUDENTS? 17

18 395 INSTRUCTOR MAINTAINED PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS STRON GLY STRONGLY IN CREATING RAPPORT WITH STUDENTS. DIS 396 HOW OFTEN DID THE INSTRUCTOR DISPLAY OFTEN SELDOM FAVORITISM TOWARD CERTAIN STUDENTS? 397 HOW OFTEN DID THE INSTRUCTOR ENCOURAGE CLASS VERY OFTEN SELDOM MEMBERS TO WORK AS A TEAM? 398 THE INSTRUCTOR ATTEMPTED TO INVOLVE ALL STRON GLY STRONGLY STUDENTS IN CLASSROOM ACTIVITIES. DIS 399 STUDENTS TALKED MORE THAN INSTRUCTOR. ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER 401 STUDENTS WERE FREE TO INTERRUPT STRON GLY STRONGLY PRESENTATIONS IF POINTS NEEDED CLARIFICATION. DIS 402 THE INSTRUCTOR ASKED STUDENTS TO HELP ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER DETERMINE CONTENT OF DISCUSSION. 403 THE INSTRUCTOR ASKED STUDENTS TO HELP ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER DETERMINE OBJECTIVES OF DISCUSSION. 404 DIRECTION OF DISCUSSION WAS CONTROLLED BY THE ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER INSTRUCTOR. 406 STUDENTS FAILED TO LAUGH, JOKE, SMILE, OR SHOW ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER OTHER SIGNS OF HUMOR. 419 THE T.A. EFFECTIVELY ANSWERED IN-CLASS ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER QUESTIONS ON THE COURSE MATERIAL. 555 HOW ACCESSIBLE WAS THE TEACHING ASSISTANT AVAILABLE NEVER FOR STUDENT CONFERENCES ABOUT THE COURSE? REGULARLY AVAILABLE 2. Student-Student Interaction General 410 HOW FRIENDLY WERE THE STUDENTS IN THIS CLASS? VERY FRIENDLY RATHER UNFRIENDLY 411 TH E TYPE OF INTERACTION AMONG MEMBERS IN THE COMMUNITY ISOLATION DISCUSSION GROUPS WAS ONE OF: SPIRIT Specific 412 HOW MUCH DID OTHER STUDENTS INFLUENCE YOUR A GREAT DEAL NOT AT ALL INTEREST IN THE COURSE? 413 STUDENTS VOLUNTEERED KNOWLEDGE, OPINIONS, OR ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER PERSONAL EXPERIENCE IN CLASS. 414 STUDENTS DEBATED WITH ONE ANOTHER OR VERY OFTEN SELDOM INSTRUCTOR IN A NON-THREATENING ATMOSPHERE. 415 DID YOU DEVELOP NEW FRIENDSHIPS IN THIS CLASS? YES, MANY NO, NONE 416 HOW OFTEN WAS CLASS OR GROUP DISCUSSION ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER MONOPOLIZED BY ONLY ONE OR A FEW STUDENTS? 417 I BECAME IRRITATED WITH THE SAME STUDENTS VERY OFTEN ALMOST NEVER MONOPOLIZING CLASS DISCUSSION. 3. Active Learning 59 SMALL GROUP ACTIVITIES HELPED ME LEARN MORE STRONGLY STRONGLY THAN I WOULD HAVE BY MYSELF. DIS 85 IN-CLASS LEARNING ACTIVITIES STIMULATED CRITICAL STRONGLY STRONGLY THINKING ABOUT COURSE MATERIAL. DIS 18

19 153 HOW EFFECTIVE WERE SMALL GROUP EXERCISES FOR VERY NOT AT ALL IMPROVING UNDERSTANDING OF MATERIAL? EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE 154 THE ONE MINUTE PAPERS IMPROVED MY UNDER- ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER STANDING OF DIFFICULT MATERIAL. 155 THE IN-CLASS ACTIVITIES KEPT ME INTERESTED IN THE STRONGLY STRONGLY COURSE CONTENT. DIS 158 THE GROUP PROJECTS TAUGHT ME VALUABLE SKILLS STRONGLY STRONGLY BEYOND JUST LEARNING COURSE CONTENT. DIS 210 MY SMALL GROUP NEEDED MORE INSTRUCTOR STRONGLY STRONGLY GUIDANCE TO WORK EFFECTIVELY. DIS 319 IT WAS WORTHWHILE TO SPEND CLASS TIME WORKING STRONGLY STRONGLY IN SMALL GROUPS. DIS 214 I HAVE LEARNED HOW TO WORK BETTER IN GROUPS AS STRONGLY STRONGLY A RESULT OF THIS COURSE. DIS 234 THE ROLE-PLAY SITUATIONS HELPED ME UNDERSTAND STRONGLY STRONGLY COURSE CONCEPTS. DIS 254 THE SIMULATIONS WERE USEFUL AIDS TO UNDER- STRONGLY STRONGLY STANDING THE MATERIAL. DIS 269 THE DEMONSTRATIONS USED IN CLASS WERE VALUABLE STRONGLY STRONGLY LEARNING TOOLS. DIS 270 CASE STUDIES INCREASED MY UNDERSTANDING OF STRONGLY STRONGLY COURSE MATERIAL. DIS 272 THE SHORT IN-CLASS WRITING ASSIGNMENTS HELPED STRONGLY STRONGLY ME UNDERSTAND COURSE CONCEPTS. DIS 274 THE PURPOSE OF THE IN-CLASS ACTIVITIES WAS VERY WELL NOT WELL EXPLAINED: 314 WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE MORE OR LESS SMALL GROUP MUCH MORE MUCH LESS WORK IN CLASS? 316 WAS THE GRADING OF THE GROUP ASSIGNMENTS FAIR? VERY FAIR VERY UNFAIR B. Physical Setting General 425 CLASSROOM FACILITIES WERE: VERY VERY POOR ADEQUATE Specific 426 THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS IN CLASS WAS: TOO LARGE TOO SMALL 427 THE CLASSROOM WAS: TOO SMALL TOO LARGE 428 COST OF INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES WAS: TOO HIGH QUITE REASONABLE 429 THE CLASSROOM SPACE PROVIDED A SUITABLE STRON GLY STRONGLY ENVIRONMENT. DIS 430 HOW ADEQUATE WAS THE LIGHTING OF THE VERY VERY CLASSROOM? ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 431 TO WHAT DID THE EQUIPMENT DETRACT FROM A GREAT NOT AT ALL THE QUALITY OF YOUR WORK? 19

20 General V. Student Preferences for Instruction/Learning Style 440 HOW VALUABLE DO YOU CONSIDER THIS COURSE? EXTREMELY NOT VALUABLE VALUABLE 441 I LIKE A TRADITIONAL COURSE FORMAT WITH LECTURE. STRON GLY STRONGLY DIS 442 I LIKE STUDENT-CENTERED CLASSES WITH LOTS OF STRON GLY STRONGLY DISCUSSION. DIS 443 I LIKE SELF-PACED COURSES WITH FLEXIBLE STRON GLY STRONGLY SCHEDULING. DIS Specific 444 I PREPARE ASSIGNED LESSONS BEFORE COMING TO ALWAYS NEVER CLASS. 446 I LEARN MORE FROM READINGS THAN FROM LECTURES STRON GLY STRONGLY AND CLASS DISCUSSIONS. DIS 447 I PREFER WELL-ORGANIZED LECTURES TO CLASS STRON GLY STRONGLY DISCUSSIONS. DIS 448 CLASS DISCUSSIONS TEND TO BE MORE STIMULATING STRON GLY STRONGLY THAN LECTURES. DIS 451 I ACTIVELY PARTICIPATE IN CLASS ACTIVITIES. YES, OFTEN NO, SELDOM 452 HOW MUCH NON-REQUIRED READING DO YOU DO FOR A ALL GENERALLY COURSE LIKE THIS? SUGGESTED NONE 453 I PREFER TO HAVE STUDENTS TALK MORE THAN THE STRON GLY STRONGLY INSTRUCTOR IN THIS TYPE OF CLASS. DIS 454 STUDENT PARTICIPATION IS A NECESSARY STRON GLY STRONGLY COMPONENT FOR THIS COURSE. DIS 455 HOW MUCH FREEDOM DO YOU PREFER IN ASSIGNED A GREAT DEAL VERY LITTLE TOPICS FOR PAPERS/REPORTS. 456 WHAT TYPE OF INSTRUCTION SUITS YOU BEST? STRUCTURED UNSTRUCTURED 457 I PREFER THE INSTRUCTOR TO USE A VARIETY OF STRON GLY STRONGLY TEACHING METHODS VS. A SINGLE METHOD. DIS 458 A MAJOR FACET OF THIS COURSE SHOULD BE THE STRON GLY STRONGLY DEVELOPMENT OF ORIGINAL IDEAS. DIS 459 I EXPECT TO BE ABLE TO WORK O N REAL PROBLEMS IN TO A GREAT NOT AT ALL THE FIELD DURING THIS COURSE. 460 I CHOSE THIS COURSE FOR EDUCATIONAL REASONS STRON GLY STRONGLY (INTERESTS, GOALS, CURIOSITY). DIS 461 I CHOSE THIS COURSE FOR NON-EDUCATIONAL STRON GLY STRONGLY REASONS (CONVENIENT TIME, PLACE, ETC.). DIS 462 FOR THIS COURSE RATE THE IMPORTANCE OF VERY NOT IMPORTANT INSTRUCTOR KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT. IMPORTANT 463 FOR THIS COURSE RATE THE IMPORTANCE OF VERY NOT IMPORTANT ORGANIZED PRESENTATIONS. IMPORTANT 464 FOR THIS COURSE RATE TH E IMPORTANCE OF VERY NOT IMPORTANT STIMULATION OF THINKING. IMPORTANT 465 FOR THIS COURSE RATE THE IMPORTANCE OF VERY NOT IMPORTANT INSTRUCTOR ACCESSIBILITY OUTSIDE OF CLASS. IMPORTANT 20

21 466 FO R THIS COURSE RATE THE IMPORTANCE OF VERY NOT IMPORTANT EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION BY INSTRUCTOR. IMPORTANT 467 FOR THIS COURSE RATE THE IMPORTANCE OF VERY NOT IMPORTANT STUDENT CLASS PARTICIPATION. IMPORTANT 468 FOR THIS COURSE RATE THE IMPORTANCE OF EARLY VERY NOT IMPORTANT FEEDBACK ON COURSE PROGRESS. IMPORTANT 469 FOR THIS COURSE RATE THE IMPORTANCE OF THE VERY NOT IMPORTANT NECESSITY FOR AN A. IMPORTANT 470 FOR THIS COURSE RATE THE IMPORTANCE OF GAINING VERY NOT IMPORTANT GENERAL KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT. IMPORTANT 471 FOR THIS COURSE RATE TH E IMPORTANCE OF GAINING VERY NOT IMPORTANT FIRST HAND APPLICATIONS. IMPORTANT 472 FOR THIS COURSE RATE THE IMPORTANCE OF VERY NOT IMPORTANT ENJOYABLE CLASS SESSIONS. IMPORTANT 473 FOR THIS COURSE RATE THE IMPORTANCE OF DOING VERY NOT IMPORTANT INDEPENDENT RESEARCH. IMPORTANT A. Laboratory VI. Specific Instructional Settings 480 WERE LAB ASSIGNMENTS INTERESTING AND YES, VERY NO, QUITE STIMULATING? INTERESTING BORING 481 WERE LAB S IMPORTANT TO LEARNING IN THIS YES, VERY NO, VERY COURSE? IMPORTANT UNIMPORTANT 482 DID LAB ASSIGNMENTS SEEM CAREFULLY CHOSEN? YES, VERY NO, CHOSEN CAREFULLY CARELESSLY 483 DID LAB ASSIGNMENTS REQUIRE A REASONABLE NO, TOO NO, TOO SIMPLE AMOUNT OF TIME AND EFFORT? DEMANDING 484 THE LENGTH OF THE LAB SESSIONS WERE: TOO LONG TOO SHORT 485 I HAD ADEQUATE TIME TO COMPLETE THE LAB YES, ALWAYS NO, SELDOM EXERCISES. 486 LAB EXPERIMENTS WERE: TOO DIFFICULT TOO EASY 487 THE LAB WAS TOO ADVANCED AND SPECIALIZED FOR STRON GLY STRONGLY MY PURPOSES. DIS 488 WERE LABS COORDINATED WITH CLASS WORK? YES, ALWAYS NO. ALMOST NEVER 489 DID THE INSTRUCTOR RELATE LAB EXERCISES TO YES, OFTEN NO, SELDOM INFORMATION FROM READINGS AND LECTURES? 490 WAS THE INSTRUCTOR PREPARED FOR LABORATORY WELL POORLY LECTURES AND PRE-LAB DISCUSSIONS? PREPARED ORGANIZED 491 WAS THE TA WELL PREPAR ED TO ANSWER YES, ALWAYS NO, ALMOST QUESTIONS ABOUT LABS? NEVER 492 DID TA ARRIVE IN TIME TO GET LAB STARTED ON YES, ALWAYS NO, ALMOST SCHEDULE? NEVER 493 WERE YOU PROVIDED ADEQUATE INSTRUCTIONS FOR YES, ALWAYS NO, SELDOM PROCEEDING WITH LAB EXERCISES? 494 DESCRIBE LABORATORY TEXTBOOK OR MANUAL EXCELLENT VERY POOR ASSIGNED FOR THIS COURSE. OW SUITABLE WAS THE PACE OF THE LAB (NUMBER TOO SLOW, O 495 H TOO FAST, TO OF EXPERIMENTS, TIME FOR EACH)? TOO LITTLE MUCH 21

22 497 LAB EQUIPMENT WAS OFTEN INOPERABLE. STRON GLY STRONGLY DIS 498 DID THE LABORATORY REPORTS ASSIST YOU TO FREQUENTLY RARELY LEARN ABOUT THEORY & EXPERIMENTAL METHODS? 499 I WOULD HAVE PREFERRED TO WORK INDIVIDUALLY IN STRON GLY STRONGLY THE LAB THAN WITH A PARTNER. DIS B. Studio Art 1. Organizational Structure 510 TOO MUCH EMPHASIS WAS PLACED ON DEVELOPING STRON GLY STRONGLY ONLY TECHNICAL SKILLS. DIS 511 WERE YOU EXPOSED TO A VARIETY OF TECHNIQUES YES, A GREAT NO, VERY LITTLE AND/OR PROCESSES? DEAL 512 THE INSTRUCTOR PLACED TOO MUCH EMPHASIS ON A STRON GLY STRONGLY PARTICULAR STYLE OR METHOD. DIS 513 THE INSTRUCTOR PRESENTED TOO MUCH TECHNICAL STRON GLY STRONGLY INFORMATION. DIS 514 THE INSTRUCTOR PROVIDED A DIVERSIT Y OF STRON GLY STRONGLY MATERIAL, TECHNIQUES, AND CONTENT. DIS 515 THE PROJECTS WERE EXTREMELY VALUABLE IN STRON GLY STRONGLY UNDERSTANDING THE COURSE. DIS 516 SHOULD THERE BE MORE/FEWER PROJECTS IN THIS MUCH MORE FEWER COURSE? 517 WAS THE COURSE ORGANIZED? YES, VERY MUCH NO, VERY LITTLE 2. Course Demands 518 HOW MUCH PRESSURE WAS THERE TO GET THINGS A GREAT DEAL VERY LITTLE DONE ON TIME? 519 THE PROJECTS WERE APPROPRIATE TO THE LEVEL OF STRON GLY STRONGLY THE COURSE. DIS 520 THE INSTRUCTO R REQUIRED TOO MUCH WORK TO BE STRON GLY STRONGLY DONE IN CLASS. DIS 521 HOW DEMANDING WAS TH E INSTRUCTOR IN TERMS OF VERY VERY LENIENT COURSE REQUIREMENTS? DEMANDING 3. Examples/Demonstrations 522 THE INSTRUCTOR'S EXAMPLES/DEMONSTRATIONS STRON GLY STRONGLY WERE CLEAR AND CONCISE. DIS 4. Explanations/Presentations 523 EACH CONCEP T WAS EXPLAINED AND DISCUSSED STRON GLY STRONGLY THOROUGHLY. DIS 524 INSTRUCTOR EXPLAINED EACH STEP CAREFULLY ALMOST ALWAYS ALMOST NEVER WHEN DISCUSSING PROCESSES/TECHNIQUES. 525 THE INSTRUCTOR SPENT TOO MUCH TIME EXPLAINING STRON GLY STRONGLY EACH PROJECT. DIS STRUCTOR DID NOT PLACE ENOUGH EMPHASIS ON STRON 526 IN GLY STRONGLY THE IMPORTANCE OF DEVELOPING SKILLS. DIS 22

Carolina Course Evaluation Item Bank Last Revised Fall 2009

Carolina Course Evaluation Item Bank Last Revised Fall 2009 Carolina Course Evaluation Item Bank Last Revised Fall 2009 Items Appearing on the Standard Carolina Course Evaluation Instrument Core Items Instructor and Course Characteristics Results are intended for

More information

TAI TEAM ASSESSMENT INVENTORY

TAI TEAM ASSESSMENT INVENTORY TAI TEAM ASSESSMENT INVENTORY By Robin L. Elledge Steven L. Phillips, Ph.D. QUESTIONNAIRE & SCORING BOOKLET Name: Date: By Robin L. Elledge Steven L. Phillips, Ph.D. OVERVIEW The Team Assessment Inventory

More information

How to make an A in Physics 101/102. Submitted by students who earned an A in PHYS 101 and PHYS 102.

How to make an A in Physics 101/102. Submitted by students who earned an A in PHYS 101 and PHYS 102. How to make an A in Physics 101/102. Submitted by students who earned an A in PHYS 101 and PHYS 102. PHYS 102 (Spring 2015) Don t just study the material the day before the test know the material well

More information

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core) FOR TEACHERS ONLY The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION CCE ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core) Wednesday, June 14, 2017 9:15 a.m. to 12:15 p.m., only SCORING KEY AND

More information

Lecturing Module

Lecturing Module Lecturing: What, why and when www.facultydevelopment.ca Lecturing Module What is lecturing? Lecturing is the most common and established method of teaching at universities around the world. The traditional

More information

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING With Specialist Frameworks for Other Professionals To be used for the pilot of the Other Professional Growth and Effectiveness System ONLY! School Library Media Specialists

More information

Stimulating Techniques in Micro Teaching. Puan Ng Swee Teng Ketua Program Kursus Lanjutan U48 Kolej Sains Kesihatan Bersekutu, SAS, Ulu Kinta

Stimulating Techniques in Micro Teaching. Puan Ng Swee Teng Ketua Program Kursus Lanjutan U48 Kolej Sains Kesihatan Bersekutu, SAS, Ulu Kinta Stimulating Techniques in Micro Teaching Puan Ng Swee Teng Ketua Program Kursus Lanjutan U48 Kolej Sains Kesihatan Bersekutu, SAS, Ulu Kinta Learning Objectives General Objectives: At the end of the 2

More information

The Stress Pages contain written summaries of areas of stress and appropriate actions to prevent stress.

The Stress Pages contain written summaries of areas of stress and appropriate actions to prevent stress. Page 1 of 8 STRESS OF INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS *** Interpersonal stress involves the areas of Esteem and Acceptance. When you are feeling stress in this area, we expect that you will begin to: Become blunt

More information

Frank Phillips College Student Course Evaluation Results. Exemplary Educational Objectives Social & Behavioral Science THECB

Frank Phillips College Student Course Evaluation Results. Exemplary Educational Objectives Social & Behavioral Science THECB Question Category: 4 Exemplary Educational Objectives Social & Behavioral Science THECB Social & Behavioral Sciences Objective 1.) To employ the appropriate methods, technologies, and data that social

More information

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) 2008 H. Craig Petersen Director, Analysis, Assessment, and Accreditation Utah State University Logan, Utah AUGUST, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary...1

More information

Kelli Allen. Vicki Nieter. Jeanna Scheve. Foreword by Gregory J. Kaiser

Kelli Allen. Vicki Nieter. Jeanna Scheve. Foreword by Gregory J. Kaiser Kelli Allen Jeanna Scheve Vicki Nieter Foreword by Gregory J. Kaiser Table of Contents Foreword........................................... 7 Introduction........................................ 9 Learning

More information

Earl of March SS Physical and Health Education Grade 11 Summative Project (15%)

Earl of March SS Physical and Health Education Grade 11 Summative Project (15%) Earl of March SS Physical and Health Education Grade 11 Summative Project (15%) Student Name: PPL 3OQ/P - Summative Project (8%) Task 1 - Time and Stress Management Assignment Objective: To understand,

More information

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program Teach For America Interim Certification Program Program Rubric Overview The Teach For America (TFA) Interim Certification Program Rubric was designed to provide formative and summative feedback to TFA

More information

Study Group Handbook

Study Group Handbook Study Group Handbook Table of Contents Starting out... 2 Publicizing the benefits of collaborative work.... 2 Planning ahead... 4 Creating a comfortable, cohesive, and trusting environment.... 4 Setting

More information

Unit 3. Design Activity. Overview. Purpose. Profile

Unit 3. Design Activity. Overview. Purpose. Profile Unit 3 Design Activity Overview Purpose The purpose of the Design Activity unit is to provide students with experience designing a communications product. Students will develop capability with the design

More information

How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test

How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test Technical Bulletin #6 Evaluation and Examination Service The University of Iowa (319) 335-0356 HOW TO JUDGE THE QUALITY OF AN OBJECTIVE CLASSROOM

More information

PSYCHOLOGY 353: SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY DEVELOPMENT IN CHILDREN SPRING 2006

PSYCHOLOGY 353: SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY DEVELOPMENT IN CHILDREN SPRING 2006 PSYCHOLOGY 353: SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY DEVELOPMENT IN CHILDREN SPRING 2006 INSTRUCTOR: OFFICE: Dr. Elaine Blakemore Neff 388A TELEPHONE: 481-6400 E-MAIL: OFFICE HOURS: TEXTBOOK: READINGS: WEB PAGE: blakemor@ipfw.edu

More information

CS 100: Principles of Computing

CS 100: Principles of Computing CS 100: Principles of Computing Kevin Molloy August 29, 2017 1 Basic Course Information 1.1 Prerequisites: None 1.2 General Education Fulfills Mason Core requirement in Information Technology (ALL). 1.3

More information

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier. Adolescence and Young Adulthood SOCIAL STUDIES HISTORY For retake candidates who began the Certification process in 2013-14 and earlier. Part 1 provides you with the tools to understand and interpret your

More information

Cognitive Thinking Style Sample Report

Cognitive Thinking Style Sample Report Cognitive Thinking Style Sample Report Goldisc Limited Authorised Agent for IML, PeopleKeys & StudentKeys DISC Profiles Online Reports Training Courses Consultations sales@goldisc.co.uk Telephone: +44

More information

Teachers Guide Chair Study

Teachers Guide Chair Study Certificate of Initial Mastery Task Booklet 2006-2007 School Year Teachers Guide Chair Study Dance Modified On-Demand Task Revised 4-19-07 Central Falls Johnston Middletown West Warwick Coventry Lincoln

More information

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency s CEFR CEFR OVERALL ORAL PRODUCTION Has a good command of idiomatic expressions and colloquialisms with awareness of connotative levels of meaning. Can convey

More information

San Marino Unified School District Homework Policy

San Marino Unified School District Homework Policy San Marino Unified School District Homework Policy Philosophy The San Marino Unified School District through established policy recognizes that purposeful homework is an important part of the instructional

More information

November 2012 MUET (800)

November 2012 MUET (800) November 2012 MUET (800) OVERALL PERFORMANCE A total of 75 589 candidates took the November 2012 MUET. The performance of candidates for each paper, 800/1 Listening, 800/2 Speaking, 800/3 Reading and 800/4

More information

E C C. American Heart Association. Basic Life Support Instructor Course. Updated Written Exams. February 2016

E C C. American Heart Association. Basic Life Support Instructor Course. Updated Written Exams. February 2016 E C C American Heart Association Basic Life Support Instructor Course Updated Written Exams Contents: Exam Memo Student Answer Sheet Version A Exam Version A Answer Key Version B Exam Version B Answer

More information

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators DPAS-II Guide (Revised) for Teachers Updated August 2017 Table of Contents I. Introduction to DPAS II Purpose of

More information

Graduate Program in Education

Graduate Program in Education SPECIAL EDUCATION THESIS/PROJECT AND SEMINAR (EDME 531-01) SPRING / 2015 Professor: Janet DeRosa, D.Ed. Course Dates: January 11 to May 9, 2015 Phone: 717-258-5389 (home) Office hours: Tuesday evenings

More information

CHEM 591 Seminar in Inorganic Chemistry

CHEM 591 Seminar in Inorganic Chemistry Washington State University MAJOR CURRICULAR CHANGE FORM - - NEW/RESTORE COURSE Please attach rationale for your request, a complete syllabus, and explain how this impacts other units in Pullman and other

More information

1. Answer the questions below on the Lesson Planning Response Document.

1. Answer the questions below on the Lesson Planning Response Document. Module for Lateral Entry Teachers Lesson Planning Introductory Information about Understanding by Design (UbD) (Sources: Wiggins, G. & McTighte, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.;

More information

Critical Thinking in Everyday Life: 9 Strategies

Critical Thinking in Everyday Life: 9 Strategies Critical Thinking in Everyday Life: 9 Strategies Most of us are not what we could be. We are less. We have great capacity. But most of it is dormant; most is undeveloped. Improvement in thinking is like

More information

Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations

Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning Included in this section are the: Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations Kentucky New Teacher Standards (Note: For your reference, the KDE website

More information

EDIT 576 DL1 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2014 August 25 October 12, 2014 Fully Online Course

EDIT 576 DL1 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2014 August 25 October 12, 2014 Fully Online Course GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM EDIT 576 DL1 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall

More information

MANAGERIAL LEADERSHIP

MANAGERIAL LEADERSHIP MANAGERIAL LEADERSHIP MGMT 3287-002 FRI-132 (TR 11:00 AM-12:15 PM) Spring 2016 Instructor: Dr. Gary F. Kohut Office: FRI-308/CCB-703 Email: gfkohut@uncc.edu Telephone: 704.687.7651 (office) Office hours:

More information

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary National Survey of Student Engagement Spring 2010 University of Kansas Executive Summary Overview One thousand six hundred and twenty-one (1,621) students from the University of Kansas completed the web-based

More information

EDIT 576 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2015 August 31 October 18, 2015 Fully Online Course

EDIT 576 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2015 August 31 October 18, 2015 Fully Online Course GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM EDIT 576 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2015 August 31 October

More information

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING Each paper was scored on a scale of - on the following traits of good writing: Ideas and Content: Organization: Voice: Word Choice: Sentence Fluency: Conventions: The ideas are clear,

More information

CHEM 6487: Problem Seminar in Inorganic Chemistry Spring 2010

CHEM 6487: Problem Seminar in Inorganic Chemistry Spring 2010 CHEM 6487: Problem Seminar in Inorganic Chemistry Spring 2010 Instructor: Dr. Stephen M. Holmes Course Time: 10 AM Friday Office Location: 418 Benton Hall Course Location: 451 Benton Hall Email: holmesst@umsl.edu

More information

English Policy Statement and Syllabus Fall 2017 MW 10:00 12:00 TT 12:15 1:00 F 9:00 11:00

English Policy Statement and Syllabus Fall 2017 MW 10:00 12:00 TT 12:15 1:00 F 9:00 11:00 English 0302.203 Policy Statement and Syllabus Fall 2017 Instructor: Patti Thompson Phone: (806) 716-2438 Email addresses: pthompson@southplainscollege.edu or pattit22@att.net (home) Office Hours: RC307B

More information

Strategic Practice: Career Practitioner Case Study

Strategic Practice: Career Practitioner Case Study Strategic Practice: Career Practitioner Case Study heidi Lund 1 Interpersonal conflict has one of the most negative impacts on today s workplaces. It reduces productivity, increases gossip, and I believe

More information

MATH 1A: Calculus I Sec 01 Winter 2017 Room E31 MTWThF 8:30-9:20AM

MATH 1A: Calculus I Sec 01 Winter 2017 Room E31 MTWThF 8:30-9:20AM Instructor: Amanda Lien Office: S75b Office Hours: MTWTh 11:30AM-12:20PM Contact: lienamanda@fhda.edu COURSE DESCRIPTION MATH 1A: Calculus I Sec 01 Winter 2017 Room E31 MTWThF 8:30-9:20AM Fundamentals

More information

MENTORING. Tips, Techniques, and Best Practices

MENTORING. Tips, Techniques, and Best Practices MENTORING Tips, Techniques, and Best Practices This paper reflects the experiences shared by many mentor mediators and those who have been mentees. The points are displayed for before, during, and after

More information

Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATs; Angelo & Cross, 1993)

Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATs; Angelo & Cross, 1993) Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATs; Angelo & Cross, 1993) From: http://warrington.ufl.edu/itsp/docs/instructor/assessmenttechniques.pdf Assessing Prior Knowledge, Recall, and Understanding 1. Background

More information

English 491: Methods of Teaching English in Secondary School. Identify when this occurs in the program: Senior Year (capstone course), week 11

English 491: Methods of Teaching English in Secondary School. Identify when this occurs in the program: Senior Year (capstone course), week 11 English 491: Methods of Teaching English in Secondary School Literacy Story and Analysis through Critical Lens Identify when this occurs in the program: Senior Year (capstone course), week 11 Part 1: Story

More information

Behaviors: team learns more about its assigned task and each other; individual roles are not known; guidelines and ground rules are established

Behaviors: team learns more about its assigned task and each other; individual roles are not known; guidelines and ground rules are established Stages of Team Development Each team will experience all four stages of development. Not all teams will choose a leader. In that situation, the team must establish a collaborative process for getting through

More information

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs Mapped to 2008 NSSE Survey Questions First Edition, June 2008 Introduction and Rationale for Using NSSE in ABET Accreditation One of the most common

More information

Promoting the Social Emotional Competence of Young Children. Facilitator s Guide. Administration for Children & Families

Promoting the Social Emotional Competence of Young Children. Facilitator s Guide. Administration for Children & Families Promoting the Social Emotional Competence of Young Children Facilitator s Guide The Center on the Social and Emotional Foundations for Early Learning Administration for Children & Families Child Care Bureau

More information

Ruggiero, V. R. (2015). The art of thinking: A guide to critical and creative thought (11th ed.). New York, NY: Longman.

Ruggiero, V. R. (2015). The art of thinking: A guide to critical and creative thought (11th ed.). New York, NY: Longman. BSL 4080, Creative Thinking and Problem Solving Course Syllabus Course Description An in-depth study of creative thinking and problem solving techniques that are essential for organizational leaders. Causal,

More information

SYLLABUS- ACCOUNTING 5250: Advanced Auditing (SPRING 2017)

SYLLABUS- ACCOUNTING 5250: Advanced Auditing (SPRING 2017) (1) Course Information ACCT 5250: Advanced Auditing 3 semester hours of graduate credit (2) Instructor Information Richard T. Evans, MBA, CPA, CISA, ACDA (571) 338-3855 re7n@virginia.edu (3) Course Dates

More information

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Education Leadership Program. Course Syllabus Spring 2006

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Education Leadership Program. Course Syllabus Spring 2006 George Mason University Graduate School of Education Education Leadership Program Course Syllabus Spring 2006 COURSE NUMBER AND TITLE: EDLE 610: Leading Schools and Communities (3 credits) INSTRUCTOR:

More information

HCI 440: Introduction to User-Centered Design Winter Instructor Ugochi Acholonu, Ph.D. College of Computing & Digital Media, DePaul University

HCI 440: Introduction to User-Centered Design Winter Instructor Ugochi Acholonu, Ph.D. College of Computing & Digital Media, DePaul University Instructor Ugochi Acholonu, Ph.D. College of Computing & Digital Media, DePaul University Office: CDM 515 Email: uacholon@cdm.depaul.edu Skype Username: uacholonu Office Phone: 312-362-5775 Office Hours:

More information

LEADERSHIP AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS

LEADERSHIP AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS LEADERSHIP AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS DEGREE: BACHELOR IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION DEGREE COURSE YEAR: 1 ST 1º SEMESTER 2º SEMESTER CATEGORY: BASIC COMPULSORY OPTIONAL NO. OF CREDITS (ECTS): 3 LANGUAGE: ENGLISH

More information

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Program: Special Education

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Program: Special Education George Mason University Graduate School of Education Program: Special Education 1 EDSE 590: Research Methods in Special Education Instructor: Margo A. Mastropieri, Ph.D. Assistant: Judy Ericksen Section

More information

University of Pittsburgh Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures. Russian 0015: Russian for Heritage Learners 2 MoWe 3:00PM - 4:15PM G13 CL

University of Pittsburgh Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures. Russian 0015: Russian for Heritage Learners 2 MoWe 3:00PM - 4:15PM G13 CL 1 University of Pittsburgh Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures Russian 0015: Russian for Heritage Learners 2 MoWe 3:00PM - 4:15PM G13 CL Spring 2011 Instructor: Yuliya Basina e-mail basina@pitt.edu

More information

Loyola University Chicago Chicago, Illinois

Loyola University Chicago Chicago, Illinois Loyola University Chicago Chicago, Illinois 2010 GRADUATE SECONDARY Teacher Preparation Program Design D The design of this program does not ensure adequate subject area preparation for secondary teacher

More information

Experience Corps. Mentor Toolkit

Experience Corps. Mentor Toolkit Experience Corps Mentor Toolkit 2 AARP Foundation Experience Corps Mentor Toolkit June 2015 Christian Rummell Ed. D., Senior Researcher, AIR 3 4 Contents Introduction and Overview...6 Tool 1: Definitions...8

More information

Learning Resource Center COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT POLICY

Learning Resource Center COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT POLICY Los Angeles Mission College Learning Resource Center COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT POLICY I. PURPOSE AND GOALS II. III. IV. SELECTION OF BOOKS Responsibility Criteria for Selection Subject Boundaries Language

More information

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics 5/22/2012 Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics College of Menominee Nation & University of Wisconsin

More information

CONCEPT MAPS AS A DEVICE FOR LEARNING DATABASE CONCEPTS

CONCEPT MAPS AS A DEVICE FOR LEARNING DATABASE CONCEPTS CONCEPT MAPS AS A DEVICE FOR LEARNING DATABASE CONCEPTS Pirjo Moen Department of Computer Science P.O. Box 68 FI-00014 University of Helsinki pirjo.moen@cs.helsinki.fi http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/pirjo.moen

More information

Alpha provides an overall measure of the internal reliability of the test. The Coefficient Alphas for the STEP are:

Alpha provides an overall measure of the internal reliability of the test. The Coefficient Alphas for the STEP are: Every individual is unique. From the way we look to how we behave, speak, and act, we all do it differently. We also have our own unique methods of learning. Once those methods are identified, it can make

More information

INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNIQUES. Teaching by Lecture

INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNIQUES. Teaching by Lecture Teaching by Lecture You must excuse the occasional unstifled yawn among students. You see, by the time they complete four years of college they will have endured almost 2000 hours of classroom instruction.

More information

HIGH SCHOOL SPECIAL NEEDS STUDENTS ATTITUDES ABOUT INCLUSION. By LaRue A. Pierce. A Research Paper

HIGH SCHOOL SPECIAL NEEDS STUDENTS ATTITUDES ABOUT INCLUSION. By LaRue A. Pierce. A Research Paper HIGH SCHOOL SPECIAL NEEDS STUDENTS ATTITUDES ABOUT INCLUSION By LaRue A. Pierce A Research Paper Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Education Degree Approved: 2 Semester

More information

4a: Reflecting on Teaching

4a: Reflecting on Teaching Domain 4: 4a: Reflecting on Teaching Professional Responsibilities Reflecting on teaching encompasses the teacher s thinking that follows any instructional event, an analysis of the many decisions made

More information

School Leadership Rubrics

School Leadership Rubrics School Leadership Rubrics The School Leadership Rubrics define a range of observable leadership and instructional practices that characterize more and less effective schools. These rubrics provide a metric

More information

THE HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK

THE HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK THE HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK Released in 2000, the Head Start Child Outcomes Framework is intended to guide Head Start programs in their curriculum planning and ongoing assessment of the progress

More information

A. True B. False INVENTORY OF PROCESSES IN COLLEGE COMPOSITION

A. True B. False INVENTORY OF PROCESSES IN COLLEGE COMPOSITION INVENTORY OF PROCESSES IN COLLEGE COMPOSITION This questionnaire describes the different ways that college students go about writing essays and papers. There are no right or wrong answers because there

More information

PROCEDURES FOR SELECTION OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LODI

PROCEDURES FOR SELECTION OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LODI PROCEDURES FOR SELECTION OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LODI Reference: Policy Number 322 and No. 322.1 (A) 3-7-94 (R) 10-10-94 The School District of Lodi shall comply with Standard

More information

Guidelines for Project I Delivery and Assessment Department of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering Lebanese American University

Guidelines for Project I Delivery and Assessment Department of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering Lebanese American University Guidelines for Project I Delivery and Assessment Department of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering Lebanese American University Approved: July 6, 2009 Amended: July 28, 2009 Amended: October 30, 2009

More information

Enhancing Learning with a Poster Session in Engineering Economy

Enhancing Learning with a Poster Session in Engineering Economy 1339 Enhancing Learning with a Poster Session in Engineering Economy Karen E. Schmahl, Christine D. Noble Miami University Abstract This paper outlines the process and benefits of using a case analysis

More information

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12) PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12) Standard I.* Standard II.* Standard III.* Standard IV. The teacher designs instruction appropriate for all students that reflects an understanding

More information

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE 2004 Results) Perspectives from USM First-Year and Senior Students Office of Academic Assessment University of Southern Maine Portland Campus 780-4383 Fall 2004

More information

MAT 122 Intermediate Algebra Syllabus Summer 2016

MAT 122 Intermediate Algebra Syllabus Summer 2016 Instructor: Gary Adams Office: None (I am adjunct faculty) Phone: None Email: gary.adams@scottsdalecc.edu Office Hours: None CLASS TIME and LOCATION: Title Section Days Time Location Campus MAT122 12562

More information

Conducting an interview

Conducting an interview Basic Public Affairs Specialist Course Conducting an interview In the newswriting portion of this course, you learned basic interviewing skills. From that lesson, you learned an interview is an exchange

More information

Learning and Teaching

Learning and Teaching Learning and Teaching Set Induction and Closure: Key Teaching Skills John Dallat March 2013 The best kind of teacher is one who helps you do what you couldn t do yourself, but doesn t do it for you (Child,

More information

Demography and Population Geography with GISc GEH 320/GEP 620 (H81) / PHE 718 / EES80500 Syllabus

Demography and Population Geography with GISc GEH 320/GEP 620 (H81) / PHE 718 / EES80500 Syllabus Demography and Population Geography with GISc GEH 320/GEP 620 (H81) / PHE 718 / EES80500 Syllabus Catalogue description Course meets (optional) Instructor Email The world's population in the context of

More information

Attention Getting Strategies : If You Can Hear My Voice Clap Once. By: Ann McCormick Boalsburg Elementary Intern Fourth Grade

Attention Getting Strategies : If You Can Hear My Voice Clap Once. By: Ann McCormick Boalsburg Elementary Intern Fourth Grade McCormick 1 Attention Getting Strategies : If You Can Hear My Voice Clap Once By: Ann McCormick 2008 2009 Boalsburg Elementary Intern Fourth Grade adm5053@psu.edu April 25, 2009 McCormick 2 Table of Contents

More information

DEPARTMENT OF KINESIOLOGY AND SPORT MANAGEMENT

DEPARTMENT OF KINESIOLOGY AND SPORT MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT OF KINESIOLOGY AND SPORT MANAGEMENT Undergraduate Sport Management Internship Guide SPMT 4076 (Version 2017.1) Box 43011 Lubbock, TX 79409-3011 Phone: (806) 834-2905 Email: Diane.nichols@ttu.edu

More information

Success Factors for Creativity Workshops in RE

Success Factors for Creativity Workshops in RE Success Factors for Creativity s in RE Sebastian Adam, Marcus Trapp Fraunhofer IESE Fraunhofer-Platz 1, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany {sebastian.adam, marcus.trapp}@iese.fraunhofer.de Abstract. In today

More information

Syllabus: Introduction to Philosophy

Syllabus: Introduction to Philosophy Syllabus: Introduction to Philosophy Course number: PHI 2010 Meeting Times: Tuesdays and Thursdays days from 11:30-2:50 p.m. Location: Building 1, Room 115 Instructor: William Butchard, Ph.D. Email: Please

More information

Chemistry 495: Internship in Chemistry Department of Chemistry 08/18/17. Syllabus

Chemistry 495: Internship in Chemistry Department of Chemistry 08/18/17. Syllabus Chemistry 495: Internship in Chemistry Department of Chemistry 08/18/17 Syllabus An internship position during academic study can be a great benefit to the student in terms of enhancing practical chemical

More information

International Business BADM 455, Section 2 Spring 2008

International Business BADM 455, Section 2 Spring 2008 International Business BADM 455, Section 2 Spring 2008 Call #: 11947 Class Meetings: 12:00 12:50 pm, Monday, Wednesday & Friday Credits Hrs.: 3 Room: May Hall, room 309 Instruct or: Rolf Butz Office Hours:

More information

Writing for the AP U.S. History Exam

Writing for the AP U.S. History Exam Writing for the AP U.S. History Exam Answering Short-Answer Questions, Writing Long Essays and Document-Based Essays James L. Smith This page is intentionally blank. Two Types of Argumentative Writing

More information

Textbook Evalyation:

Textbook Evalyation: STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Vol. 1, No. 8, 2010, pp. 54-60 www.cscanada.net ISSN 1923-1555 [Print] ISSN 1923-1563 [Online] www.cscanada.org Textbook Evalyation: EFL Teachers Perspectives on New

More information

Practical Integrated Learning for Machine Element Design

Practical Integrated Learning for Machine Element Design Practical Integrated Learning for Machine Element Design Manop Tantrabandit * Abstract----There are many possible methods to implement the practical-approach-based integrated learning, in which all participants,

More information

Reducing Spoon-Feeding to Promote Independent Thinking

Reducing Spoon-Feeding to Promote Independent Thinking Reducing Spoon-Feeding to Promote Independent Thinking Janice T. Blane This paper was completed and submitted in partial fulfillment of the Master Teacher Program, a 2-year faculty professional development

More information

2 nd grade Task 5 Half and Half

2 nd grade Task 5 Half and Half 2 nd grade Task 5 Half and Half Student Task Core Idea Number Properties Core Idea 4 Geometry and Measurement Draw and represent halves of geometric shapes. Describe how to know when a shape will show

More information

Illinois WIC Program Nutrition Practice Standards (NPS) Effective Secondary Education May 2013

Illinois WIC Program Nutrition Practice Standards (NPS) Effective Secondary Education May 2013 Illinois WIC Program Nutrition Practice Standards (NPS) Effective Secondary Education May 2013 Nutrition Practice Standards are provided to assist staff in translating policy into practice. This guidance

More information

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE PROCESS FOR RANKED FACULTY 2-0902 ACADEMIC AFFAIRS September 2015 PURPOSE The purpose of this policy and procedures letter

More information

Dear Internship Supervisor:

Dear Internship Supervisor: Dear Internship Supervisor: Thank you for agreeing to supervise the internship of a Hunter College Geography student. I hope that this arrangement will benefit both your organization and our student. Student

More information

Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio

Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio Guidelines, Rubrics, and Requirements 2 THE EXIT PORTFOLIO A s-based Presentation of Evidence for the Licensure of Beginning Teachers Purpose:

More information

What effect does science club have on pupil attitudes, engagement and attainment? Dr S.J. Nolan, The Perse School, June 2014

What effect does science club have on pupil attitudes, engagement and attainment? Dr S.J. Nolan, The Perse School, June 2014 What effect does science club have on pupil attitudes, engagement and attainment? Introduction Dr S.J. Nolan, The Perse School, June 2014 One of the responsibilities of working in an academically selective

More information

Student Course Evaluation Survey Form

Student Course Evaluation Survey Form Appendix I Student Course Evaluation Survey Form LaSalle College Vancouver aims to meet the highest teaching standards and to offer students a quality learning experience. Therefore, the College is committed

More information

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None Through the integrated study of literature, composition,

More information

How to make successful presentations in English Part 2

How to make successful presentations in English Part 2 Young Researchers Seminar 2013 Young Researchers Seminar 2011 Lyon, France, June 5-7, 2013 DTU, Denmark, June 8-10, 2011 How to make successful presentations in English Part 2 Witold Olpiński PRESENTATION

More information

Doctoral GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE STUDY

Doctoral GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE STUDY Doctoral GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE STUDY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATION STUDIES Southern Illinois University, Carbondale Carbondale, Illinois 62901 (618) 453-2291 GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE STUDY DEPARTMENT OF

More information

TU-E2090 Research Assignment in Operations Management and Services

TU-E2090 Research Assignment in Operations Management and Services Aalto University School of Science Operations and Service Management TU-E2090 Research Assignment in Operations Management and Services Version 2016-08-29 COURSE INSTRUCTOR: OFFICE HOURS: CONTACT: Saara

More information

March. July. July. September

March. July. July. September Preparing students for internationalisation at home: evaluating a twoweek induction programme in a one-year masters programme Dr Prue Holmes, Durham University Aims of the project This project evaluated

More information

What Am I Getting Into?

What Am I Getting Into? 01-Eller.qxd 2/18/2004 7:02 PM Page 1 1 What Am I Getting Into? What lies behind us is nothing compared to what lies within us and ahead of us. Anonymous You don t invent your mission, you detect it. Victor

More information

PREP S SPEAKER LISTENER TECHNIQUE COACHING MANUAL

PREP S SPEAKER LISTENER TECHNIQUE COACHING MANUAL 1 PREP S SPEAKER LISTENER TECHNIQUE COACHING MANUAL IMPORTANCE OF THE SPEAKER LISTENER TECHNIQUE The Speaker Listener Technique (SLT) is a structured communication strategy that promotes clarity, understanding,

More information

EDUC 2020: FOUNDATIONS OF MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION Spring 2011

EDUC 2020: FOUNDATIONS OF MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION Spring 2011 EDUC 2020: FOUNDATIONS OF MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION Spring 2011 1. Identification of Course 1.1 EDUC 2020: Foundations of Multicultural Education (3-3-0) Prerequisites: None Meets 3 hours per week Grade

More information

Accounting 312: Fundamentals of Managerial Accounting Syllabus Spring Brown

Accounting 312: Fundamentals of Managerial Accounting Syllabus Spring Brown Class Hours: MW 3:30-5:00 (Unique #: 02247) UTC 3.102 Professor: Patti Brown, CPA E-mail: patti.brown@mccombs.utexas.edu Office: GSB 5.124B Office Hours: Mon 2:00 3:00pm Phone: (512) 232-6782 TA: TBD TA

More information