Student Outcome Evaluation & Assessment Rubrics
|
|
- Neil Daniel
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 AUTONOMOUS UNIVERSITY OF NUEVO LEON FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE Student Outcome Evaluation & Assessment Rubrics Educational Program on Food Industry Engineer February 12, 2017
2 Outcome (a): Apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering. Mathematical principles Does not understand the Select a mathematical Chooses a Combines mathematical connection between model considering the mathematical model or and/or scientific principles mathematical, chemical and fundament chemical and scientific principle that to formulate models of physical or biology physical or biology applies to an engineering chemical or physical processes and systems in process problem, but has trouble processes and systems materials science and in model development relevant to materials science engineering and engineering Calculus in solving materials science a n d engineering Does not understand the connection between theory and the problem for application of calculus in solving materials science and engineering problems Demonstrates partial applications of theory to the problem and expects theory to predict reality using calculus in problemsolving Shows nearly complete applications of theory to the problem and expects theory to predict reality using calculus in problem- solving Recognizes the limitations of engineering models in real life but applies concepts of integral and differential calculus and solve materials science and engineering problems Mathematical Interpretation Mathematical terms are interpreted incorrectly Calculations performed Calculations not performed or performed incorrectly Mathematical terms are interpreted partially Perform calculations with major errors Most mathematical terms are interpreted correctly Development calculations with minor errors Shows appropriate engineering interpretation of mathematical and scientific terms Executes calculus correctly
3 Outcome (b): An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data. Design an experimental strategy Experimental plan, identification of variables and data collection procedure are missing Experimental plan, identification of variables and data collection procedure are formulated poorly Experimental plan, identification of variables and data collection procedure are formulated adequately, but does not cover completely the objectives Experimental plan, identification of variables and data collection procedure are formulated correctly and cover all the objectives Develop experimental work and data acquisition Analyze, interpret and compare experimental data appropriately i. Experimental work and data acquisition appears to have significant errors. ii. Collected data are disorganized, random, and incomplete and are not documented. Analysis, interpretation and comparisons of data are not made, and differences are not identified or are incorrectly explained. i. Experimental work and data acquisition does not include any detail on instrument precision or accuracy performance. ii. Collected data are organized and planned but is incomplete and poorly documented. Analysis, interpretation and comparisons of data are weak, and most differences are correctly identified, but many are poorly explained i. Experimental work and data acquisition includes instrument precision or accuracy performance. ii. Collection are organized, planned, complete, but are not all documented. Analysis, interpretation and comparisons o f data are adequate; all differences are correctly identified but are not completely explained i. Experimental work and data acquisition includes all relevant sensitivity and calibration information. ii. Collection are organized, planned and are completely documented Analysis, interpretation and comparisons of data are correctly done, all relevant differences have been identified, completely explained
4 Outcome (c): An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability. Formulate the problem (identify the "need") and analyze constraints Establish "fitness" criteria for evaluating potential and tradeoffs Generate alternative Build a prototype and analyze performance i. Unable to formulate the problem at all ii. Does not understand the concept of constraint i. Unable to establish fitness criteria ii. Does not understand the concept of tradeoffs Unable to derive any meaningful solution Unable to build a proper prototype i. Partial formulation, but missing some key constraints ii. Understand the concepts of constraints but is unable to formulate the problem i. Somewhat able to establish fitness criteria and tradeoffs whit major weaknesses. ii. Misses several criterial tradeoffs i. Derives a meaningful solution ii. Unable to drive alternative i. Builds a prototype with some help. ii. Shows major weaknesses in analyzing performance i. Formulate the problem and use constraints in formulation ii. Unable to use the most efficient formulation Establishes fitness criteria and tradeoffs whit minor weaknesses Derives multiple Has some weaknesses in evaluation of alternative i. Builds an adequate prototype ii. Somewhat able to analyze performance i. Formulate the problem and analyzes all relevant constraints ii. Find the best formulatio n i. Establishes complete fitness criteria. ii. Analyzes tradeoffs thoroughly Derives alternative Performs proper evaluation of alternative Builds a welldeveloped prototype Fully analyzes the performance
5 Outcome (d): An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams. Contributes to the Project or Team Work Assume Responsibility It does not collect useful information; Does not make important suggestions to the needs of the team He does not perform assigned tasks, he misses team meetings and when he does not say anything constructive, he follows the work done by the other team members. Collects information when pressed; Tries to expose some ideas but does not develop them clearly or correctly to the needs of the team. Performs assigned tasks but needs to be reminded frequently; Regularly attends meetings but generally says nothing constructive, sometimes expects others to do their work. Collects basic and useful information to the needs of the project. Occasionally it offers ideas that are useful to the needs of the team Perform assigned tasks, regularly attend meetings, and usually participate effectively, usually reliable. Collects and presents a lot of relevant information. It offers well-developed and clearly expressed ideas related to the team project. It does all the tasks effectively well and participates with enthusiasm, it is highly reliable. Recognizes the work of Team Members Frequently discusses with team members, does not allow others to speak; Occasionally launches personal attacks; Does things in style and does not listen to other approaches to solution. Usually does not talk much, does not pay much attention when others speak and often considers that the ideas of others will not work; Does not launch personal attacks but does not defend their ideas, is condescending; When you are made to understand you work acceptably well with the team. Usually listens to other points of view, always uses appropriate and respectful language, try understand other ideas. Always listen to others; Helps to develop the ideas of others by giving credit to their contribution; Always helps the team to make the right decision.
6 Creativity The information presented is a copy of the existing one there is no personal contribution; The information is already existing but presents it in an acceptably fluid and logical form; Sometimes makes personal contributions Usually the information presented is a result of his personal analysis based on the bibliography consulted and presents it in a fluid and logical form. The information provided is always useful for the purposes of the project and the result of the analysis of the bibliography consulted presented in a fluid and logical form Outcome (e): An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. Problem Statement (Identify) Procedure (Formulate) Final Solution (Solve) No problem statement or very little the problem. No procedure, tries things out unsystematically. Final solution is not correct, or not provided. Problem statement shows some the problem. Some of what information is known and what needs to be determined. Outlines principles and a general procedure, but with errors in the principles or procedure.. Final solution is not correct. Some additional calculation errors may occur in the solution phase. Problem statement shows almost full the problem. Most of what information is known and what needs to be determined. Clear presentation of correct principles and procedure, but with some minor errors in the equations Final solution would be correct, if the minor errors in the equations are corrected. Some additional minor calculation errors may occur in the solution phase. Problem statement clearly shows full the problem. Clearly and completely states what information is known and what needs to be determined. Clear presentation of correct principles, procedure, and equations. Final solution is correct. No errors or some very minor calculation errors in the solution phase.
7 Outcome (f): An professional and ethical Basic concepts Basic analysis of ethics and professionalism Application of ethics and professionalism Discussion of ethics and professionalism Student only names the major theory she/he uses about the professional and ethical aspects. Student can recognize basic and obvious the ethical and professional but fails to grasp complexity or interrelationships Student apply the ethical and professional perspectives to an ethical question with support but is unable to apply the ethical perspectives independently. Student state a position but cannot state the objections to and assumptions and limitations of the different perspectives/concepts. Student can present the gist of the professional and ethical aspects. Student can recognize basic and obvious the ethical and professional and grasp (incompletely) the complexities. Student can apply the ethical and professional perspectives/concepts to a problem. Student can state the objections, assumptions and implications of different the professional and ethical perspectives/concepts but does not respond to objections, assumptions, and implications. Student can apply the professional and ethical aspects. Student can recognize the ethical and professional when presented in a complex context. Student can independently apply the ethical and professional perspectives/concepts to a problem. Student states a position and can state the objections to assumptions and implications to the professional and ethical perspectives/concepts. Student accurately explains the details of the professional and ethical aspects Student can recognize cross relationships among the ethical and professional. Student can independently apply the ethical and professional concepts, accurately, and is able to consider full implications of the application. Student can reasonably defend against the objections, assumptions and implications of different the professional and ethical perspectives/concepts, and the student's defense is adequate and effective.
8 Outcome (g): an ability to communicate effectively. Activity evaluated: Organization of the presentation Presentation of content in your own words to demonstrate understanding Presentation of data to support the information of the Poor organization (sections in paragraphs). The justification of the problem is not observed The conclusion was lost Larger sections were lost The reference was lost The information is inaccurate or irrelevant There are some inconsistencies in the subject of exposure Speech control is not evident when speaking, clarity and voice volume The speaker does not make eye contact with the audience Ideas not clearly expressed without support or details Confusing organization Weak justification Weak conclusion Some sections of the presentation are presented weakly Weak presentation of references Some basic information, but some of it is irrelevant An important part of the text is read Presents a basic some parts of the subject Speech clarity is uneven Limited or sporadic eye contact with the audience Ideas not clearly expressed and with weak details The organization was largely logical and complete Adequate justification Adequate conclusion Appropriate references Adequate information with some minor errors or omissions Adequate research The text is mostly of the author in his own words, only some quotes are copies of texts Present general the topic Good voice, easily recovers from mistakes when speaking Good eye contact with the audience during the presentation Ideas are generally expressed clearly and details are adequate Excellent organization. Good justification approach Excellent conclusion Complete the list of references Exceptional information (relevant and appropriate) Careful and thorough research All the text belongs to the author Has a full the subject Strong, clear, easy-tounderstand voice by the audience Excellent eye contact throughout the presentation Ideas are well developed, clearly with appropriate details
9 subject in the presentation Demonstrates proper use of Spanish There is no interpretation of the data There are no illustrations to support the message Numerous errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling Many phrases have inadequate construction The presentation does not appear to have been revised Weak data analysis The illustrations are not related to the message or are confused Some errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling Some phrases are improperly constructed The review appears to have been hasty Data analysis is adequate Illustrations support ideas, but some do not present information in the best way Few errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling Few phrases have inadequate construction If the review was carried out but future revisions could have improved the text Data analysis is complete and clear Illustrations fully support the message, are appropriate and catch the eye Minor errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling A varied and creative sentence structure Demonstrates a thorough review Outcome (h): The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context Engineering Engineering decisions Incapable to detect relevant contexts of an engineering problem. Very scarce the pertinent contexts of an engineering problem. Deficient to appreciate the impacts of engineering decisions. Knows relevant context of the engineering Described the one relevant context of an engineering problem. Appropriate of engineering decision to explain impact on only one context. Few explanations of relevant impacts of engineering decisions. Recognizes relevant contexts of an engineering problem. Describes at least two or three contexts of an engineering problem. Explanation about two to three impact of engineering decisions. Elucidation of majority engineering decisions substantively. Identify relevant contexts among three or four of an engineering problem. Detect at least three of an engineering problem. Elucidation of relevant impacts of engineering decisions about three or four of the contexts. Clarification about all contexts of majority engineering decisions substantively.
10 Outcome (i): A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning. Activity evaluated: It explores a topic in depth, producing a great awareness and / or littleknown information that indicates an intense interest in the subject. Complete the required work, generate and look for opportunities to expand knowledge and skills. Educational interests and activities exist and thrive outside of the classroom requirements. Knowledge and / or experiences are carried out independently It refers explicitly to prior learning and is applied in an innovative (new and creative) way than the knowledge and skills to demonstrate understanding and Explore a topic with very little sense of discipline Very isolated ideas from the topic do not identify the purpose of the study. Incomplete work The justification of the variables studied is unclear. It does not substantiate the justification for discussion and conclusion of the topic. Deficient interpretation of tables and graphs, difficulty for scientific language. It explores a topic at the superficial level, providing little information and / or information beyond the very basic facts that indicate a low interest in the subject. Complete the required work. It begins to look beyond the requirements of the classroom, showing interest in pursuing knowledge independently. It makes vague references to prior learning, but does not apply knowledge and skills to demonstrate understanding and It explores a topic with some evidence of depth, providing information and / or occasional information that indicates a slight interest in the topic. Complete the required work and identify opportunities to expand knowledge, skills and abilities. Beyond the requirements of the class, it pursues additional knowledge and / or shows interest in pursuing independent educational experiences. It refers to prior learning and attempts to apply that knowledge and skills to demonstrate understanding and performance in novel situations. It explores a topic in depth, producing a great awareness and / or little-known information that indicates an intense interest in the subject. Complete the required work, generate and look for opportunities to expand knowledge, skills and abilities. Educational interests and activities exist and thrive outside of the classroom requirements. Knowledge and / or experiences are carried out independently. It makes explicit reference to prior learning and is applied in an innovative (new and creative) way than the knowledge and skills to demonstrate
11 performance in novel situations. Review previous learning (past and present in and outside the classroom) on the surface, without revealing clear meaning or indicating a broader perspective on educational or life events. Does not show experience in exhibitions or in the development of presentations, it is difficult to follow the exhibition performance in new situations. It reviews previous learning (past experiences inside and outside the classroom) at the surface level, without revealing clarified meaning or indicating a broader perspective on educational or life events. It reviews previous learning (past experiences inside and outside the classroom) at the surface level, without revealing clarified meaning or indicating a broader perspective on educational or life events. understanding and performance in novel situations. It reviews previous learning (past experiences inside and outside the classroom) at the surface level, without revealing clarified meaning or indicating a broader perspective on educational or life events. Outcome (j): A knowledge of. Identify related to engineering i. Little knowledge of ii. Cannot identify i. Identifies a issue but important facts are missing i. Identifies more than one relevant issue ii. Ignores some less significant, yet relevant i. Identifies several relevant, including subtle details ii. Does not include unrelated
12 Explain potential iii. iv. Shows little Provides little or incorrect explanation of potential ii. iii. Shows some Provides some explanation of potential but important facts are missing iii. iv. Shows adequate Provides adequate explanation of potential missing the explanation of minor facts iii. iv. Shows in-depth Provides indepth explanation of potential Outcome (k): An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern necessary for en gineering practice Activity evaluated: Identify for a given practical situation Explain to use in engineering practice Apply engineering tools to use in engineering practice Not identify engineering tools for a given practical situation Identify unrelated Offers lack engineering tools to use in engineering practice Provides incorrect to use in engineering practice Use null engineering tools Incorrectly applies the Identifies some for a given practical situation Includes some unrelated to practical application Describes some in the practice Provides some incorrect explanations of engineering tools in the application practice Properly applies some of the Mistakenly applies some Recognizes almost all of the relevant engineering tools for a given practical situation Present some minor Explains how almost all of the Displays adequate Appropriately applies almost all of the Establishes adequate use of Detects all relevant Does not include Unrelated engineering tools Explicates how all relevant engineering tools Explains in-depth Properly applies all relevant engineering tools Determines domain of Does not use unnecessary
Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis
FYE Program at Marquette University Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis Writing Conventions INTEGRATING SOURCE MATERIAL 3 Proficient Outcome Effectively expresses purpose in the introduction
More informationTRAITS OF GOOD WRITING
TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING Each paper was scored on a scale of - on the following traits of good writing: Ideas and Content: Organization: Voice: Word Choice: Sentence Fluency: Conventions: The ideas are clear,
More informationRUBRICS FOR M.TECH PROJECT EVALUATION Rubrics Review. Review # Agenda Assessment Review Assessment Weightage Over all Weightage Review 1
GURU NANAK DEV ENGINEERING COLLEGE, LUDHIANA An Autonomous College Under UGC Act [2(f) 12(B)] (Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering) RUBRICS FOR M.TECH PROJECT EVALUATION Rubrics Review
More informationMASTER S THESIS GUIDE MASTER S PROGRAMME IN COMMUNICATION SCIENCE
MASTER S THESIS GUIDE MASTER S PROGRAMME IN COMMUNICATION SCIENCE University of Amsterdam Graduate School of Communication Kloveniersburgwal 48 1012 CX Amsterdam The Netherlands E-mail address: scripties-cw-fmg@uva.nl
More informationGuidelines for Project I Delivery and Assessment Department of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering Lebanese American University
Guidelines for Project I Delivery and Assessment Department of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering Lebanese American University Approved: July 6, 2009 Amended: July 28, 2009 Amended: October 30, 2009
More informationFacing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text
Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text by Barbara Goggans Students in 6th grade have been reading and analyzing characters in short stories such as "The Ravine," by Graham
More informationStatistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics
5/22/2012 Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics College of Menominee Nation & University of Wisconsin
More informationMathematics Scoring Guide for Sample Test 2005
Mathematics Scoring Guide for Sample Test 2005 Grade 4 Contents Strand and Performance Indicator Map with Answer Key...................... 2 Holistic Rubrics.......................................................
More informationNovember 2012 MUET (800)
November 2012 MUET (800) OVERALL PERFORMANCE A total of 75 589 candidates took the November 2012 MUET. The performance of candidates for each paper, 800/1 Listening, 800/2 Speaking, 800/3 Reading and 800/4
More informationCHEM 591 Seminar in Inorganic Chemistry
Washington State University MAJOR CURRICULAR CHANGE FORM - - NEW/RESTORE COURSE Please attach rationale for your request, a complete syllabus, and explain how this impacts other units in Pullman and other
More informationSmarter Balanced Assessment Consortium: Brief Write Rubrics. October 2015
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium: Brief Write Rubrics October 2015 Target 1 Narrative (Organization Opening) provides an adequate opening or introduction to the narrative that may establish setting
More informationPhysics 270: Experimental Physics
2017 edition Lab Manual Physics 270 3 Physics 270: Experimental Physics Lecture: Lab: Instructor: Office: Email: Tuesdays, 2 3:50 PM Thursdays, 2 4:50 PM Dr. Uttam Manna 313C Moulton Hall umanna@ilstu.edu
More informationThe College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12
A Correlation of, 2017 To the Redesigned SAT Introduction This document demonstrates how myperspectives English Language Arts meets the Reading, Writing and Language and Essay Domains of Redesigned SAT.
More informationScoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.
Adolescence and Young Adulthood SOCIAL STUDIES HISTORY For retake candidates who began the Certification process in 2013-14 and earlier. Part 1 provides you with the tools to understand and interpret your
More informationWelcome to the Purdue OWL. Where do I begin? General Strategies. Personalizing Proofreading
Welcome to the Purdue OWL This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue (http://owl.english.purdue.edu/). When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice at bottom. Where do I begin?
More informationDESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0
DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0 QUALITY RUBRIC FOR STEM PHILANTHROPY This rubric aims to help companies gauge the quality of their philanthropic efforts to boost learning in science, technology, engineering
More informationSouth Carolina English Language Arts
South Carolina English Language Arts A S O F J U N E 2 0, 2 0 1 0, T H I S S TAT E H A D A D O P T E D T H E CO M M O N CO R E S TAT E S TA N DA R D S. DOCUMENTS REVIEWED South Carolina Academic Content
More informationGraduate Program in Education
SPECIAL EDUCATION THESIS/PROJECT AND SEMINAR (EDME 531-01) SPRING / 2015 Professor: Janet DeRosa, D.Ed. Course Dates: January 11 to May 9, 2015 Phone: 717-258-5389 (home) Office hours: Tuesday evenings
More informationKENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING
KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING With Specialist Frameworks for Other Professionals To be used for the pilot of the Other Professional Growth and Effectiveness System ONLY! School Library Media Specialists
More informationIntroduction and Motivation
1 Introduction and Motivation Mathematical discoveries, small or great are never born of spontaneous generation. They always presuppose a soil seeded with preliminary knowledge and well prepared by labour,
More informationEnglish 491: Methods of Teaching English in Secondary School. Identify when this occurs in the program: Senior Year (capstone course), week 11
English 491: Methods of Teaching English in Secondary School Literacy Story and Analysis through Critical Lens Identify when this occurs in the program: Senior Year (capstone course), week 11 Part 1: Story
More informationExamining the Structure of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Program
Paper ID #9172 Examining the Structure of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Program Mr. Bob Rhoads, The Ohio State University Bob Rhoads received his BS in Mechanical Engineering from The
More informationTeachers Guide Chair Study
Certificate of Initial Mastery Task Booklet 2006-2007 School Year Teachers Guide Chair Study Dance Modified On-Demand Task Revised 4-19-07 Central Falls Johnston Middletown West Warwick Coventry Lincoln
More informationFOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)
FOR TEACHERS ONLY The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION CCE ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core) Wednesday, June 14, 2017 9:15 a.m. to 12:15 p.m., only SCORING KEY AND
More informationHISTORY COURSE WORK GUIDE 1. LECTURES, TUTORIALS AND ASSESSMENT 2. GRADES/MARKS SCHEDULE
HISTORY COURSE WORK GUIDE 1. LECTURES, TUTORIALS AND ASSESSMENT Lectures and Tutorials Students studying History learn by reading, listening, thinking, discussing and writing. Undergraduate courses normally
More informationAchievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition
Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition Georgia Department of Education September 2015 All Rights Reserved Achievement Levels and Achievement Level Descriptors With the implementation
More informationCAAP. Content Analysis Report. Sample College. Institution Code: 9011 Institution Type: 4-Year Subgroup: none Test Date: Spring 2011
CAAP Content Analysis Report Institution Code: 911 Institution Type: 4-Year Normative Group: 4-year Colleges Introduction This report provides information intended to help postsecondary institutions better
More informationSectionalism Prior to the Civil War
Sectionalism Prior to the Civil War GRADE 7 This sample task contains a set of primary and authentic sources about how the differences between the North and South deepened the feelings of sectionalism
More informationThe Writing Process. The Academic Support Centre // September 2015
The Writing Process The Academic Support Centre // September 2015 + so that someone else can understand it! Why write? Why do academics (scientists) write? The Academic Writing Process Describe your writing
More informationArizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS
Arizona s English Language Arts Standards 11-12th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS 11 th -12 th Grade Overview Arizona s English Language Arts Standards work together
More informationKIS MYP Humanities Research Journal
KIS MYP Humanities Research Journal Based on the Middle School Research Planner by Andrew McCarthy, Digital Literacy Coach, UWCSEA Dover http://www.uwcsea.edu.sg See UWCSEA Research Skills for more tips
More informationWebQuest - Student Web Page
WebQuest - Student Web Page On the Home Front WW2 A WebQuest for Grade 9 American History Allyson Ayres - May 15, 2014 Children pointing at movie poster for Uncle Sam at Work at the Auditorium Theater
More informationProject Based Learning Debriefing Form Elementary School
Project Name: Student Name: Project Based Learning Debriefing Form Elementary School Use this form to debrief after completing the project (or staff may modify the questions to suit your project). Youth
More informationUNIT 3: Research & Methodology
One Stop Shop For Educators The following instructional plan is part of a GaDOE collection of Unit Frameworks, Performance Tasks, examples of Student Work, and Teacher Commentary. UNIT 3: Research & Methodology
More informationWriting for the AP U.S. History Exam
Writing for the AP U.S. History Exam Answering Short-Answer Questions, Writing Long Essays and Document-Based Essays James L. Smith This page is intentionally blank. Two Types of Argumentative Writing
More informationASSESSMENT GUIDELINES (PRACTICAL /PERFORMANCE WORK) Grade: 85%+ Description: 'Outstanding work in all respects', ' Work of high professional standard'
'Outstanding' FIRST Grade: 85%+ Description: 'Outstanding work in all respects', ' Work of high professional standard' Performance/Presentation : The work is structured, designed, performed and presented
More informationWith guidance, use images of a relevant/suggested. Research a
Learning Focus/Criteria Emerging Developing Evolving AO1 DEVELOP AND INVESTIGATE Develop ideas through investigations inforstudentd by contextual and other sources, demonstrating analytical and cultural
More informationMulti-genre Writing Assignment
Multi-genre Writing Assignment for Peter and the Starcatchers Context: The following is an outline for the culminating project for the unit on Peter and the Starcatchers. This is a multi-genre project.
More information1. Answer the questions below on the Lesson Planning Response Document.
Module for Lateral Entry Teachers Lesson Planning Introductory Information about Understanding by Design (UbD) (Sources: Wiggins, G. & McTighte, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.;
More informationCritical Thinking in Everyday Life: 9 Strategies
Critical Thinking in Everyday Life: 9 Strategies Most of us are not what we could be. We are less. We have great capacity. But most of it is dormant; most is undeveloped. Improvement in thinking is like
More informationTopic 3: Roman Religion
Topic 3: Roman Religion Stards: 1. s will be able to identify most of the defining attributes of several aspects of Roman culture. 2. s will be able to explain how the characteristics of one culture are
More informationSPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM
SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM (Revised 11/2014) 1 Fern Ridge Schools Specialist Performance Review and Evaluation System TABLE OF CONTENTS Timeline of Teacher Evaluation and Observations
More informationBe aware there will be a makeup date for missed class time on the Thanksgiving holiday. This will be discussed in class. Course Description
HDCN 6303-METHODS: GROUP COUNSELING Department of Counseling and Dispute Resolution Southern Methodist University Thursday 6pm 10:15pm Jan Term 2013-14 Be aware there will be a makeup date for missed class
More informationGrade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)
Grade 4 Common Core Adoption Process (Unpacked Standards) Grade 4 Reading: Literature RL.4.1 Refer to details and examples in a text when explaining what the text says explicitly and when drawing inferences
More informationSt. Martin s Marking and Feedback Policy
St. Martin s Marking and Feedback Policy The School s Approach to Marking and Feedback At St. Martin s School we believe that feedback, in both written and verbal form, is an integral part of the learning
More informationEnglish Language Arts Missouri Learning Standards Grade-Level Expectations
A Correlation of, 2017 To the Missouri Learning Standards Introduction This document demonstrates how myperspectives meets the objectives of 6-12. Correlation page references are to the Student Edition
More informationThe Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3
The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3 The State Board adopted the Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework (December 2009) as guidance for the State, districts, and schools
More informationECON 365 fall papers GEOS 330Z fall papers HUMN 300Z fall papers PHIL 370 fall papers
Assessing Critical Thinking in GE In Spring 2016 semester, the GE Curriculum Advisory Board (CAB) engaged in assessment of Critical Thinking (CT) across the General Education program. The assessment was
More informationNational Literacy and Numeracy Framework for years 3/4
1. Oracy National Literacy and Numeracy Framework for years 3/4 Speaking Listening Collaboration and discussion Year 3 - Explain information and ideas using relevant vocabulary - Organise what they say
More informationThe Effect of Close Reading on Reading Comprehension. Scores of Fifth Grade Students with Specific Learning Disabilities.
The Effect of Close Reading on Reading Comprehension Scores of Fifth Grade Students with Specific Learning Disabilities By Erica Blouin Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree
More informationStudent Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:
Grade 6 ELA CCLS: Reading Standards for Literature Column : In preparation for the IEP meeting, check the standards the student has already met. Column : In preparation for the IEP meeting, check the standards
More informationBENGKEL 21ST CENTURY LEARNING DESIGN PERINGKAT DAERAH KUNAK, 2016
BENGKEL 21ST CENTURY LEARNING DESIGN PERINGKAT DAERAH KUNAK, 2016 NAMA : CIK DIANA ALUI DANIEL CIK NORAFIFAH BINTI TAMRIN SEKOLAH : SMK KUNAK, KUNAK Page 1 21 st CLD Learning Activity Cover Sheet 1. Title
More informationHow to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test
How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test Technical Bulletin #6 Evaluation and Examination Service The University of Iowa (319) 335-0356 HOW TO JUDGE THE QUALITY OF AN OBJECTIVE CLASSROOM
More information5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE
Triolearn General Programmes adapt the standards and the Qualifications of Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) and Cambridge ESOL. It is designed to be compatible to the local and the regional
More informationTimeline. Recommendations
Introduction Advanced Placement Course Credit Alignment Recommendations In 2007, the State of Ohio Legislature passed legislation mandating the Board of Regents to recommend and the Chancellor to adopt
More informationOregon Institute of Technology Computer Systems Engineering Technology Department Embedded Systems Engineering Technology Program Assessment
Oregon Institute of Technology Computer Systems Engineering Technology Department Embedded Systems Engineering Technology Program Assessment 2014-15 I. Introduction The Embedded Systems Engineering Technology
More informationTechnical Manual Supplement
VERSION 1.0 Technical Manual Supplement The ACT Contents Preface....................................................................... iii Introduction....................................................................
More informationEarl of March SS Physical and Health Education Grade 11 Summative Project (15%)
Earl of March SS Physical and Health Education Grade 11 Summative Project (15%) Student Name: PPL 3OQ/P - Summative Project (8%) Task 1 - Time and Stress Management Assignment Objective: To understand,
More informationCEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales
CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency s CEFR CEFR OVERALL ORAL PRODUCTION Has a good command of idiomatic expressions and colloquialisms with awareness of connotative levels of meaning. Can convey
More informationTU-E2090 Research Assignment in Operations Management and Services
Aalto University School of Science Operations and Service Management TU-E2090 Research Assignment in Operations Management and Services Version 2016-08-29 COURSE INSTRUCTOR: OFFICE HOURS: CONTACT: Saara
More informationSupervised Agriculture Experience Suffield Regional 2013
Name Chapter Mailing address Home phone Email address: Cell phone Date of Birth Present Age Years of Ag. Ed. completed as of Year in school or year of graduation Year Greenhand Degree awarded Total active
More informationREPORT ON CANDIDATES WORK IN THE CARIBBEAN ADVANCED PROFICIENCY EXAMINATION MAY/JUNE 2012 HISTORY
CARIBBEAN EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL REPORT ON CANDIDATES WORK IN THE CARIBBEAN ADVANCED PROFICIENCY EXAMINATION MAY/JUNE 2012 HISTORY Copyright 2012 Caribbean Examinations Council St Michael, Barbados All rights
More informationLITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY
"Pupils should be taught in all subjects to express themselves correctly and appropriately and to read accurately and with understanding." QCA Use of Language across the Curriculum "Thomas Estley Community
More informationInterpreting ACER Test Results
Interpreting ACER Test Results This document briefly explains the different reports provided by the online ACER Progressive Achievement Tests (PAT). More detailed information can be found in the relevant
More informationANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE
ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE ANG-5055-6 DEFINITION OF THE DOMAIN SEPTEMBRE 1995 ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE ANG-5055-6 DEFINITION OF THE DOMAIN SEPTEMBER 1995 Direction de la formation générale des adultes Service
More informationMyths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)
Assessment Focus This task focuses on Communication through the mode of Writing at Levels 3, 4 and 5. Two linked tasks (Hot Seating and Character Study) that use the same context are available to assess
More informationPrentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)
Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10) 12.1 Reading The standards for grade 1 presume that basic skills in reading have
More informationSenior Project Information
BIOLOGY MAJOR PROGRAM Senior Project Information Contents: 1. Checklist for Senior Project.... p.2 2. Timeline for Senior Project. p.2 3. Description of Biology Senior Project p.3 4. Biology Senior Project
More informationScience Fair Project Handbook
Science Fair Project Handbook IDENTIFY THE TESTABLE QUESTION OR PROBLEM: a) Begin by observing your surroundings, making inferences and asking testable questions. b) Look for problems in your life or surroundings
More informationAssessment Method 1: RDEV 7636 Capstone Project Assessment Method Description
2012-2013 Assessment Report Program: Real Estate Development, MRED College of Architecture, Design & Construction Raymond J. Harbert College of Business Real Estate Development, MRED Expected Outcome 1:
More informationASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE
ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE March 28, 2002 Prepared by the Writing Intensive General Education Category Course Instructor Group Table of Contents Section Page
More informationEDIT 576 DL1 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2014 August 25 October 12, 2014 Fully Online Course
GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM EDIT 576 DL1 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall
More informationThe Paradox of Structure: What is the Appropriate Amount of Structure for Course Assignments with Regard to Students Problem-Solving Styles?
The Paradox of Structure: What is the Appropriate Amount of Structure for Course Assignments with Regard to Students 59 th Annual NACTA Conference Virginia Tech June, 2013 Curt Friedel Megan Seibel Introduction
More informationPAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))
Ohio Academic Content Standards Grade Level Indicators (Grade 11) A. ACQUISITION OF VOCABULARY Students acquire vocabulary through exposure to language-rich situations, such as reading books and other
More informationDesigning a Rubric to Assess the Modelling Phase of Student Design Projects in Upper Year Engineering Courses
Designing a Rubric to Assess the Modelling Phase of Student Design Projects in Upper Year Engineering Courses Thomas F.C. Woodhall Masters Candidate in Civil Engineering Queen s University at Kingston,
More informationNumber of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)
Program: Journalism Minor Department: Communication Studies Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20 Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012) Period of reference
More informationPHILOSOPHY & CULTURE Syllabus
PHILOSOPHY & CULTURE Syllabus PHIL 1050 FALL 2013 MWF 10:00-10:50 ADM 218 Dr. Seth Holtzman office: 308 Administration Bldg phones: 637-4229 office; 636-8626 home hours: MWF 3-5; T 11-12 if no meeting;
More informationLearning Disability Functional Capacity Evaluation. Dear Doctor,
Dear Doctor, I have been asked to formulate a vocational opinion regarding NAME s employability in light of his/her learning disability. To assist me with this evaluation I would appreciate if you can
More informationUIMN Preparing for Intercultural Ministry (3 hours) Fall 2015 MW 11:00 WM 122
Dan Burton dan.burton@ccuniversity.edu (513) 244-8167 Office: Lower Level of Presidents Hall UIMN 330 - Preparing for Intercultural Ministry (3 hours) Fall 2015 MW 11:00 12:15 @ WM 122 Description A study
More informationKhairul Hisyam Kamarudin, PhD 22 Feb 2017 / UTM Kuala Lumpur
Khairul Hisyam Kamarudin, PhD 22 Feb 2017 / UTM Kuala Lumpur DISCLAIMER: What is literature review? Why literature review? Common misconception on literature review Producing a good literature review Scholarly
More informationTo provide students with a formative and summative assessment about their learning behaviours. To reinforce key learning behaviours and skills that
To provide students with a formative and summative assessment about their learning behaviours. To reinforce key learning behaviours and skills that are important for lifelong learning and academic success.
More informationeportfolio Assessment of General Education
eportfolio Assessment of General Education Pages from the eportfolios of Matthew Potts and Adam Eli Spikell. Used with Permission. Table of Contents Section Page Methods 2 Results--Quantitative Literacy
More informationPrentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes Gold 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards, (Grade 9)
Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards, (Grade 9) 12.1 Reading The standards for grade 1 presume that basic skills in reading have been taught before grade 4 and that students are independent readers. For
More informationRUBRICS FOR MAJOR PROJECT EVALUATION
Rubrics Review RUBRICS FOR MAJOR PROJECT EVALUATION Review # Agenda Assessment Review Over all Assess Weightage ment Weight age Review 1 Review 2 Project Synopsis/ Rubric R1 Proposal (30) 25% Evaluation
More informationMYP Language A Course Outline Year 3
Course Description: The fundamental piece to learning, thinking, communicating, and reflecting is language. Language A seeks to further develop six key skill areas: listening, speaking, reading, writing,
More informationSummer Assignment AP Literature and Composition Mrs. Schwartz
2015-2016 Summer Assignment AP Literature and Composition Mrs. Schwartz Contact Information: Email: meschwar@vbschools.com or bschwar12@gmail.com Edmodo Group Code: 534ta8 OVERVIEW This summer, you will
More informationBSc (Hons) in International Business
School of Business, Management and Economics Department of Business and Management BSc (Hons) in International Business Course Handbook 2016/17 2016 Entry Table of Contents School of Business, Management
More informationA Correlation of. Grade 6, Arizona s College and Career Ready Standards English Language Arts and Literacy
A Correlation of, To A Correlation of myperspectives, to Introduction This document demonstrates how myperspectives English Language Arts meets the objectives of. Correlation page references are to the
More informationIt s News to Me! Teaching with Colorado s Historic Newspaper Collection Model Lesson Format
It s News to Me! Teaching with Colorado s Historic Newspaper Collection Model Lesson Format Lesson Title: Colorado Irrigation Methods and Water Rights Disputes in the Late 1800s and Early 1900s Subject(s)
More informationMATH 1A: Calculus I Sec 01 Winter 2017 Room E31 MTWThF 8:30-9:20AM
Instructor: Amanda Lien Office: S75b Office Hours: MTWTh 11:30AM-12:20PM Contact: lienamanda@fhda.edu COURSE DESCRIPTION MATH 1A: Calculus I Sec 01 Winter 2017 Room E31 MTWThF 8:30-9:20AM Fundamentals
More informationFlorida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1
Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1 Reading Endorsement Guiding Principle: Teachers will understand and teach reading as an ongoing strategic process resulting in students comprehending
More informationENGLISH. Progression Chart YEAR 8
YEAR 8 Progression Chart ENGLISH Autumn Term 1 Reading Modern Novel Explore how the writer creates characterisation. Some specific, information recalled e.g. names of character. Limited engagement with
More informationIntroducing the New Iowa Assessments Language Arts Levels 15 17/18
Introducing the New Iowa Assessments Language Arts Levels 15 17/18 ITP Assessment Tools Math Interim Assessments: Grades 3 8 Administered online Constructed Response Supplements Reading, Language Arts,
More informationGrade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None
Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None Through the integrated study of literature, composition,
More informationEDIT 576 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2015 August 31 October 18, 2015 Fully Online Course
GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM EDIT 576 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2015 August 31 October
More informationMGMT 3362 Human Resource Management Course Syllabus Spring 2016 (Interactive Video) Business Administration 222D (Edinburg Campus)
MGMT 3362 Human Resource Management Course Syllabus Spring 2016 (Interactive Video) INSTRUCTOR INFORMATION Instructor: Marco E. Garza, PhD Office: Business Administration 222D (Edinburg Campus) Office
More information: USING RUBRICS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF SENIOR DESIGN PROJECTS
2006-853: USING RUBRICS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF SENIOR DESIGN PROJECTS John K. Estell, Ohio Northern University JOHN K. ESTELL is Chair of the Electrical & Computer Engineering and Computer Science Department
More informationChemistry Senior Seminar - Spring 2016
Chemistry 4990- Senior Seminar - Spring 2016 Instructor: Prof. Bob Brown E-mail: bob.brown@usu.edu Phone: 797-0545 Office: W026 Office Hours Monday and Wednesday from 2:00-2:50 PM and by appointment Class
More informationReading Project. Happy reading and have an excellent summer!
Reading Project In order to prepare for seventh grade, you are required to read at least one book from the District 54 Summer Reading List. The list contains both fiction and non-fiction books at different
More information