GENERAL EVALUATION SUMMARY THE TOPEKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS USD 501 TOPEKA, KANSAS
|
|
- Moris Potter
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 GENERAL EVALUATION SUMMARY THE TOPEKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS USD 501 TOPEKA, KANSAS Name Soc. Sec. # School Assignment All of the following areas were considered in this evaluation: I. Planning and Preparation A. Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy B. Demonstrating Knowledge of Students C. Selecting Instructional Goals D. Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources E. Designing Coherent Instruction F. Assessing Student Learning Comments by : II. The Classroom Environment A. Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport B. Establishing a Culture for Learning C. Managing Classroom Procedures D. Managing Student Behavior E. Organizing Physical Space Comments by : III. Instruction A. Communicating Clearly and Accurately B. Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques C. Engaging Students in Learning D. Providing Feedback to Students E. Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness Comments by : 1
2 IV. Responsibilities A. Reflecting on Teaching B. Maintaining Accurate Records C. Communicating with Families D. Contributing to the School and District E. Growing and Developing ly F. Showing ism Comments by : Dates of Formal : Date: Date: Date: Beginning Time: Beginning Time: Beginning Time: Ending Time: Ending Time: Ending Time: Total Time Observed: Total Time Observed: Total Time Observed: Additional Comments by (if any): Comments by Teacher (if any): RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NEXT YEAR: (Not to be completed for the first a. Renew Contract [ ] semester evaluation of teachers b. Probationary Renewal [ ] being evaluated two times per year.) c. Non-renewal [ ] AN EVALUATION CONFERENCE HAS BEEN HELD. (The teacher s signature does not necessarily imply agreement with the content.) Teacher Date Date Principal Date FB-43A Rev Distribution: Original Human Resources; 1 copy Learning and Instruction; 1 copy Principal; 1 copy - Teacher 2
3 USD 501 Feedback Form Teacher Observer(s) Grade Level(s) Subject(s) Date DIRECTIONS: Using the rubric, the teacher and observer, independently or together, circle (or highlight) each relevant descriptor indicating the level of performance. Together, review the Summaries and Suggestions for Future Practice. Page 1 Feedback Form
4 Domain 1: Planning and Preparation LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED 1a: Demonstrating Teacher displays little understanding of the subject or structure of related Teacher s content and pedagogical knowledge represents basic Teacher demonstrates solid understanding of the content and its Teacher s knowledge of the content and pedagogy is extensive, showing evidence Knowledge of pedagogy. understanding but does not extend to prerequisite relationships and connections of a continuing search for improved connections with other disciplines or to with other disciplines. Teacher s practice. Teacher actively builds on Content and possible student misconceptions instructional practices reflect current knowledge of prerequisites and Pedagogy pedagogical knowledge. misconceptions when describing instruction or seeking causes for student 1b: Demonstrating Knowledge of Students 1c: Selecting Instructional Goals 1d: Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction 1f: Assessing Student Learning Teacher makes little or no attempt to acquire knowledge of students backgrounds, skills, or interests, and does not use such information in planning. Teacher s goals represent trivial learning, are unsuitable for students, or are stated only as instructional activities, and they do not permit viable methods of assessment. Teacher is unaware of school or district resources available either for teaching or for students who need them. The various elements of the instructional design do not support the stated instructional goals or engage students in meaningful learning, and the lesson or unit has no defined structure Teacher s approach to assessing student learning contains no clear criteria or standards, and lacks congruence with the instructional goals. Teacher has no plans to use assessment results in designing future instruction. Summary and Suggestions for Future Practice Teacher demonstrates partial knowledge of students backgrounds, skills, and interests, and attempts to use this knowledge in planning for the class as a whole. Teacher s goals are of moderate value or suitability for students in the class, consisting of a combination of goals and activities, some of which permit viable methods of assessment. Teacher displays limited knowledge of school or district resources available either for teaching or for students who need them. Some of the elements of the instructional design support the stated instructional goals and engage students in meaningful learning, while others do not. Teacher s lesson or unit has recognizable structure. Teacher s plan for student assessment is partially aligned with the instructional goals and includes criteria and standards that are not entirely clear or understood by students. Teacher uses the assessment to plan for future instruction for the class as a whole. Teacher demonstrates thorough knowledge of students backgrounds, skills, and interests, and uses this knowledge to plan for groups of students. Teacher s goals represent valuable learning and are suitable for most students in the class; they reflect opportunities for integration and permit viable methods of assessment. Teacher is fully aware of school and district resources available for teaching, and knows how to gain access to school and district resources for students who need them. Most of the elements of the instructional design support the stated instructional goals and engage students in meaningful learning and the lesson or unit has clearly defined structure. Teacher s plan for student assessment is aligned with the instructional goals at least nominally, with clear assessment criteria and standards that have been communicated to students. Teacher uses the assessment to plan for groups of students or individuals. misunderstanding. Teacher demonstrates thorough knowledge of students backgrounds, skills, and interests, and uses this knowledge to plan for individual student learning. Teacher s goals reflect high-level learning relating to curriculum frameworks and standards; they are adapted, where necessary, to the needs of individual students, and permit viable methods of assessment. Teacher seeks out resources for teaching in professional organizations in the community, and is aware of resources available for students who need them, in the school, the district, and the larger community. All of the elements of the instructional design support the stated instructional goals, engage students in meaningful learning, and show evidence of student input. Teacher s lesson or unit is highly coherent and has a clear structure. Teacher s plan for student assessment is fully aligned with the instructional goals, containing clear assessment criteria and standards that are not only understood by students but also show evidence of student participation in their development. Teacher s students monitor their own progress in achieving the goals. Page 2 Feedback Form
5 Domain 2: The Classroom Environment LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED 2a: Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport Classroom interactions, both between the teacher and students and among students, are negative or inappropriate and characterized by sarcasm, putdowns, or conflict. Classroom interactions are generally appropriate and free from conflict but may be characterized by occasional displays of insensitivity. Classroom interactions reflect general warmth and caring, and are respectful of the cultural and developmental differences among groups of students. 2b: Establishing a Culture for Learning 2c: Managing Classroom Procedures 2d: Managing Student Behavior 2e: Organizing Physical Space The classroom does not represent a culture for learning and is characterized by low teacher commitment to the subject, low expectations for student achievement and little student pride in work. Classroom routines and procedures are either nonexistent or inefficient, resulting in the loss of much instruction time. Student behavior is poor, with no clear expectations, no monitoring of student behavior, and inappropriate response to student misbehavior. Teacher makes poor use of the physical environment, resulting in unsafe or inaccessible conditions for some students or a serious mismatch between the furniture arrangement and the lesson activities. Summary and Suggestions for Future Practice The classroom environment reflects only a minimal culture for learning, with only modest or inconsistent expectations for student achievement, little teacher commitment to the subject, and little student pride in work. Both teacher and students are performing at the minimal level to get by. Classroom routines and procedures have been established but function unevenly or inconsistently, with some loss of instructional time. Teacher makes an effort to establish standards of conduct for students, monitor student behavior, and respond to student misbehavior, but these efforts are not always successful. Teacher s classroom is safe, and essential learning is accessible to all students, but the furniture arrangement only partially supports the learning activities. The classroom environment represents a genuine culture for learning, with commitment to the subject on the part of teacher and students, high expectations for student achievement, and student pride in work. Classroom routines and procedures have been established and function smoothly for the most part, with little loss of instruction time. Teacher is aware of student behavior, has established clear standards of conduct, and responds to student misbehavior in ways that are appropriate and respectful of the students. Teacher s classroom is safe, and learning is accessible to all students; teacher uses physical resources well and ensures that the arrangement of furniture supports the learning activities. Classroom interactions are highly respectful, reflecting genuine warmth and caring toward individuals. Students themselves ensure maintenance of high levels of civility among members of the class. Students assume much of the responsibility for establishing a culture for learning in the classroom by taking pride in their work, initiating improvements to their products, and holding the work to the highest standard. Teacher demonstrates a passionate commitment to the subject. Classroom routines and procedures are seamless in their operation, and students assume considerable responsibility for their smooth functioning. Student behavior is entirely appropriate, with evidence of student participation in setting expectations and monitoring behavior is subtle and preventive, and teacher s response to student misbehavior is sensitive to individual student needs. Teacher s classroom is safe, and students contribute to ensuring that the physical environment supports the learning of all students. Page 3 Feedback Form
6 Domain 3: Instruction LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED 3a: Communicating Clearly and Accurately Teacher s oral and written communication contains errors or is unclear or inappropriate to students. Teacher s oral and written communication contains no errors, but may not be completely appropriate or may require further explanations to avoid confusion. Teacher communicates clearly and accurately to students, both orally and in writing. 3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques 3c: Engaging Students in Learning 3d: Providing Feedback to Students 3e: Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness Teacher makes poor use of questioning and discussion techniques, with low-level questions, limited student participation, and little true discussion. Students are not all intellectually engaged in significant learning, as a result of inappropriate activities or materials, poor representations of content, or lack of lesson structure. Teacher s feedback to students is of poor quality and is not given in a timely manner. Teacher adheres to the instruction plan in spite of evidence of poor student understanding or of students lack of interest, and fails to respond to students questions; teacher assumes no responsibility for students failure to understand. Summary and Suggestions for Future Practice Teacher s use of questioning and discussion techniques is uneven, with some high-level questions, attempts at true discussion, and moderate student participation. Students are intellectually engaged only partially, resulting from activities or materials of uneven quality, inconsistent representations of content or uneven structure or pacing. Teacher s feedback to students is uneven, and its timeliness is inconsistent. Teacher demonstrates moderate flexibility and responsiveness to students needs and interests during a lesson, and seeks to ensure the success of all students. Teacher s use of questioning and discussion techniques reflects high-level questions, true discussion, and full participation by all students. Students are intellectually engaged throughout the lesson, with appropriate activities and materials, instructive representations of content and suitable structure and pacing of the lesson. Teacher s feedback to students is timely and of consistently high quality. Teacher seeks ways to ensure successful learning for all students, making adjustments as needed to instruction plans and responding to student interests and questions. Teacher s oral and written communication is clear and expressive, anticipating possible student misconceptions. Students formulate many of the high-level questions and assume responsibility for the participation of all students in the discussion. Students are highly engaged throughout the lesson and make material contributions to the representation of content, the activities, and the materials. The structure and pacing of the lesson allow for student reflection and closure. Teacher s feedback to students is timely and of consistently high quality, and students make use of the feedback in their learning. Teacher is highly responsive to students interests and questions, making major lesson adjustments if necessary, and persists in ensuring the success of all students. Page 4 Feedback Form
7 Domain 4: Responsibilities LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED 4a: Reflecting on Teacher does not reflect accurately on the lesson or propose ideas as to how it might Teacher s reflection on the lesson is generally accurate, and teacher makes Teacher reflects accurately on the lesson, citing general characteristics and makes Teacher s reflection on the lesson is highly accurate and perceptive, citing specific Teaching be important. global suggestions as to how it might be some specific suggestions about how it examples. Teacher draws on an improved. might be improved. extensive repertoire to suggest alternative 4b: Maintaining Accurate Records 4c: Communicating with Families 4d: Contributing to the School and District 4e: Growing and Developing ly 4f: Showing ism Teacher has no system for maintaining accurate records, resulting in errors and confusion. Teacher provides little or no information to families and makes no attempt to engage them in the instructional program. Teacher s relationships with colleagues are negative or self-serving, and teacher avoids being involved in school and district projects. Teacher does not participate in professional development activities, even when such activities are clearly needed for the development of teaching skills. Teacher s sense of professionalism is low, and teacher contributes to practices that are self-serving or harmful to students. Summary and Suggestions for Future Practice Teacher s system for maintaining accurate records is rudimentary and only partially effective. Teacher complies with school procedures for communicating with families and makes an effort to engage families in the instructional program. Teacher s relationships with colleagues are cordial, and teacher participates in school and district events and projects when specifically requested. Teacher s participation in professional development activities is limited to those that are convenient. Teacher s attempts to serve students based on the best information are genuine but inconsistent. Teacher s system for maintaining accurate records is efficient and effective. Teacher communicates frequently with families and successfully engages them in the instructional program. Teacher participates actively in school and district projects, and maintains positive relationships with colleagues. Teacher participates actively in professional development activities and contributes to the profession. Teacher makes genuine and successful efforts to ensure that all students are well served by the school. strategies. Teacher s system for maintaining accurate records is efficient and effective, and students contribute to its maintenance. Teacher communicates frequently and sensitively with families and successfully engages them in the instructional program; students participate in communicating with families. Teacher makes a substantial contribution to school and district events and projects, assuming leadership with colleagues. Teacher makes a substantial contribution to the profession through such activities as action research and mentoring new teachers, and actively pursues professional development. Teacher assumes a leadership position in ensuring that school practices and procedures ensure that all students, particularly those traditionally underserved, are honored in the school. Page 5 Feedback Form
8 EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES COVERED BY THE PROFESSIONAL AGREEMENT WHO ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE LICENSED BY KSDE Employee Category First and Second year employees receiving a satisfactory evaluation First year employees found to be at risk of receiving a probationary or non-renewal recommendation on her/his evaluation Second year employees found to be at risk of receiving a probationary or non-renewal recommendation on her/his evaluation Third year employees receiving a satisfactory evaluation Third year employees found to be at risk of receiving a probationary or non-renewal recommendation on her/his evaluation Tenured (four or more years) employees receiving a satisfactory evaluation. Tenured (four or more years) employees found to be at risk of receiving a probationary recommendation on her/his evaluation. Tenured (four or more years) employees found to be at risk of receiving a non-renewal recommendation on her/his evaluation. Reference Table EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR LICENSED FIRST AND SECOND YEAR EMPLOYEES RECEIVING A SATISFACTORY EVALUATION EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR LICENSED FIRST YEAR EMPLOYEES FOUND TO BE AT RISK OF RECEIVING A PROBATIONARY OR NON-RENEWAL RECOMMENDATION ON HER/HIS EVALUATION. EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR LICENSED SECOND YEAR EMPLOYEES FOUND TO BE AT RISK OF RECEIVING A PROBATIONARY OR NON-RENEWAL RECOMMENDATION ON HER/HIS EVALUATION. EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR LICENSED THIRD YEAR EMPLOYEES RECEIVING A SATISFACTORY EVALUATION EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR LICENSED THIRD YEAR EMPLOYEES FOUND TO BE AT RISK OF RECEIVING A PROBATIONARY OR NON-RENEWAL RECOMMENDATION ON HER/HIS EVALUATION. EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR LICENSED TENURED (FOUR OR MORE YEARS) EMPLOYEES RECEIVING A SATISFACTORY EVALUATION EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR LICENSED TENURED (FOUR OR MORE YEARS) EMPLOYEES FOUND TO BE AT RISK OF RECEIVING A PROBATIONARY RECOMMENDATION ON HER/HIS EVALUATION. EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR LICENSED TENURED (FOUR OR MORE YEARS) EMPLOYEES FOUND TO BE AT RISK OF RECEIVING A NON-RENEWAL RECOMMENDATION ON HER/HIS EVALUATION. bargaining unit may be different from those used by classroom professional employees. Page 1
9 EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR FIRST AND SECOND YEAR EMPLOYEES RECEIVING A SATISFACTORY EVALUATION Group Orientation Familiarize professional employee with the procedures. All forms are presented with an explanation of each form provided. This should be done both orally and in writing. Goal setting meeting Provide teacher with assistance in setting professional development goals and completing required form. Formal A minimum of 30 minutes per observation is required. Formal Post-observation Feedback and Reflection that will form later conversations and judgments about the professional employee s professional practice. A minimum of 20 minutes per observation is required. that will form later conversations and judgments about the professional employee s professional practice. The evaluator will provide feedback to the professional employee regarding the evidence captured during the classroom observation. The professional employee will provide the evaluator his/her reflections. Reflection Sheet No later than the 10 th duty day of 1 st semester No later than September 30 Principal At least 2 formal observations of no less than 30 minutes in duration and limited to 1 per school day during first 60 days of 1 st semester. At least 3 formal observations of no less than 20 minutes in duration and limited to 1 per school day during second evaluation period (61 st day of 1 st semester to 60 th day of 2 nd semester). Within 5 school days of the observation or at a mutually agreeable time. employee bargaining unit may be different from those used by classroom professional employees. Page 2
10 Evaluation and Conference EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR FIRST AND SECOND YEAR EMPLOYEES RECEIVING A SATISFACTORY EVALUATION This conference focuses on the overall performance of the professional employee. Dates and times documenting the formal observations made by an administrator shall be included on the evaluation form. All Forms No later than the 60 th duty day of 1 st and 2 nd semesters bargaining unit may be different from those used by classroom professional employees. Page 3
11 EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR FIRST YEAR EMPLOYEES FOUND TO BE AT RISK OF RECEIVING A PROBATIONARY OR NON-RENEWAL RECOMMENDATION ON HER/HIS EVALUATION Group Orientation Familiarize professional employee with the procedures. All forms are presented with an explanation of each form provided. This should be done both orally and in writing. Goal setting meeting Provide teacher with assistance in setting professional development goals and completing required form. Formal 1 st evaluation period Post-observation Feedback and Reflection A minimum of 30 minutes per observation is required. that will form later conversations and judgments about the professional employee s professional practice. The evaluator will provide feedback to the professional employee regarding the evidence captured during the classroom observation. The professional employee will provide the evaluator his/her reflections. by Department Chair or other professional employee for 1 class period. The consultation between the administrator and the Department chair or other professional employee will occur before, not after the observation. Reflection Sheet No later than the 10 th duty day of 1 st semester No later than September 30 Principal At least 2 formal observations of no less than 30 minutes in duration. Must be completed by 60 th duty day of 1 st semester. Within 5 school days of the observation or at a mutually agreeable time. 1 class period employee is responsible for facilitation bargaining unit may be different from those used by classroom professional employees. Page 4
12 EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR FIRST YEAR EMPLOYEES FOUND TO BE AT RISK OF RECEIVING A PROBATIONARY OR NON-RENEWAL RECOMMENDATION ON HER/HIS EVALUATION Employee is required without loss of pay to observe another professional employee approved by the evaluator with the same curricular expertise in the building, district, or nearby Development Formal 2 nd evaluation period Post-observation Feedback and Reflection during the 2 nd evaluation period Summative Evaluation and Conference district. Employee is required without loss of pay to attend an in-service at the option of the administrator. A minimum of 40 minutes per observation is required. that will form later conversations and judgments about the professional employee s professional practice. The evaluator will provide feedback to the professional employee regarding the evidence captured during the classroom observation. The professional employee will provide the evaluator his/her reflections. This conference focuses on the overall performance of the professional employee. Dates and times documenting the formal observations made by an administrator shall be included on the evaluation form. Reflection Sheet All Forms One-half day is responsible for facilitation 1 day is responsible At least 3 formal observations of no less than 40 minutes in duration and limited to 1 per school day during second evaluation period (61 st day of 1 st semester to 60 th day of 2 nd semester). Within 5 school days of the observation or at a mutually agreeable time. No later than the 60 th duty day of 1 st and 2 nd semesters for facilitation employee bargaining unit may be different from those used by classroom professional employees. Page 5
13 EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR SECOND YEAR EMPLOYEES FOUND TO BE AT RISK OF RECEIVING A PROBATIONARY OR NON-RENEWAL RECOMMENDATION ON HER/HIS EVALUATION Group Orientation Familiarize professional employee with the procedures. All forms are presented with an explanation of each form provided. This should Individual Goal setting meeting Formal 1 st evaluation period Post-observation Feedback and Reflection Meeting with and Written Improvement Plan Written Notice of Potential Job Jeopardy be done both orally and in writing. Provide teacher with assistance in setting professional development goals and completing required form. A minimum of 30 minutes per observation is required. that will form later conversations and judgments about the professional employee s professional practice. The evaluator will provide feedback to the professional employee regarding the evidence captured during the classroom observation. The professional employee will provide the evaluator his/her reflections. The employee will receive a written improvement plan that includes established goals and a timeline that will result in the employee s professional improvement. The plan will be signed by both parties. Employee will receive written notice of potential probationary or non-renewal status. Reflection Sheet No later than the 10 th duty day of 1 st semester No later than September 30 Principal At least 2 formal observations of no less than 30 minutes in duration. Must be completed by 60 th duty day of 1 st semester. Within 5 school days of the observation or at a mutually agreeable time. Within 5 school days of the evaluation meeting. By the end of 1 st semester with follow-up by April 1. employee bargaining unit may be different from those used by classroom professional employees. Page 6
14 EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR SECOND YEAR EMPLOYEES FOUND TO BE AT RISK OF RECEIVING A PROBATIONARY OR NON-RENEWAL RECOMMENDATION ON HER/HIS EVALUATION by Department Chair or other professional employee for 1 class period. The consultation between the administrator and the Department chair or other professional employee will occur before, not after the observation. Employee is required without loss of pay to observe another professional employee approved by the evaluator with the same curricular expertise in the building, district, or nearby district. by an appropriate District administrator. Development Formal 2 nd evaluation period that will form later judgments about the professional employee s professional practice. Employee is required to attend an in-service at the option of the administrator. A minimum of 40 minutes per observation is required. that will form later conversations and judgments about the professional employee s professional practice. 1 class period One day 2 hours is responsible for facilitation is responsible for facilitation is responsible for facilitation 1 day is responsible for facilitation At least 3 formal observations of no less than 40 minutes in duration and limited to 1 per school day during second evaluation period (61 st day of 1 st semester to 60 th day of 2 nd semester). bargaining unit may be different from those used by classroom professional employees. Page 7
15 EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR SECOND YEAR EMPLOYEES FOUND TO BE AT RISK OF RECEIVING A PROBATIONARY OR NON-RENEWAL RECOMMENDATION ON HER/HIS EVALUATION Post-observation Feedback and Reflection During the 2 nd evaluation period Summative Evaluation and Conference The evaluator will provide feedback to the professional employee regarding the evidence captured during the classroom observation. The professional employee will provide the evaluator his/her reflections. This conference focuses on the overall performance of the professional employee. Dates and times documenting the formal observations made by an administrator shall be included on the evaluation form. Reflection Sheet All Forms Within 5 school days of the observation or at a mutually agreeable time. No later than the 60 th duty day of 1 st and 2 nd semesters employee bargaining unit may be different from those used by classroom professional employees. Page 8
16 EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR THIRD YEAR EMPLOYEES RECEIVING A SATISFACTORY EVALUATION Group Orientation Familiarize professional employee with the procedures. All forms are presented with an explanation of each form provided. This should be done both orally and in writing. Goal setting meeting Provide teacher with assistance in setting professional development goals and completing required form. Formal A minimum of 40 minutes is required for this observation. The intent is to observe an entire lesson. It is understood that a lesson may last longer than 40 minutes at some levels. Post-observation Feedback and Reflection Summative Evaluation and Conference that will form later conversations and judgments about the professional employee s professional practice. The evaluator will provide feedback to the professional employee regarding the evidence captured during the classroom observation. The professional employee will provide the evaluator his/her reflections. This conference focuses on the overall performance of the professional employee. Dates and times documenting the formal observations made by an administrator shall be included on the evaluation form. Reflection Sheet No later than the 10 th duty day of 1 st semester No later than September 30 At least 1 formal observation of no less than 40 minutes in duration prior to February 15. Within 5 school days of the observation or at a mutually agreeable time. All Forms No later than February 15 Principal employee bargaining unit may be different from those used by classroom professional employees. Page 9
17 EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR THIRD YEAR EMPLOYEES FOUND TO BE AT RISK OF RECEIVING A PROBATIONARY OR NON-RENEWAL RECOMMENDATION ON HER/HIS EVALUATION Group Orientation Familiarize professional employee with the procedures. All forms are presented with an explanation of each form provided. This should Individual Goal setting meeting Formal Post-observation Feedback and Reflection Meeting with And Written Improvement Plan Written Notice of Potential Job Jeopardy be done both orally and in writing. Provide teacher with assistance in setting professional development goals and completing required form. A minimum of 30 minutes per observation is required. that will form later conversations and judgments about the professional employee s professional practice. The evaluator will provide feedback to the professional employee regarding the evidence captured during the classroom observation. The professional employee will provide the evaluator his/her reflections. The employee will receive a written improvement plan that includes established goals and a timeline that will result in the employee s professional improvement. The plan will be signed by both parties. Employee will receive written notice of potential probationary or non-renewal status. Reflection Sheet No later than the 10 th duty day of 1 st semester No later than September 30 Principal At least 4 formal observations of no less than 30 minutes in duration and limited to 1 per school day prior to February 15 Within 5 school days of the observation or at a mutually agreeable time. No later than December 1 with goals to be reached by February 15 By December 1 employee bargaining unit may be different from those used by classroom professional employees. Page 10
18 EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR THIRD YEAR EMPLOYEES FOUND TO BE AT RISK OF RECEIVING A PROBATIONARY OR NON-RENEWAL RECOMMENDATION ON HER/HIS EVALUATION Follow-up Conference A follow-up conference between the evaluator and employee must be scheduled to communicate the status of goal achievement OR Development Summative Evaluation and Conference after each formal observation. Employee is required to either: observe another professional employee approved by the evaluator with the same curricular expertise in the building, district, or nearby district OR attend an in-service. by an appropriate District administrator. that will form later judgments about the professional employee s professional practice. This conference focuses on the overall performance of the professional employee. Dates and times documenting the formal observations made by an administrator shall be included on the evaluation form. Prior to February 15 (within 5 days of the formal observation) One day 2 hours All Forms No later than February 15 is responsible for facilitation is responsible for facilitation bargaining unit may be different from those used by classroom professional employees. Page 11
19 EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR TENURED (FOUR OR MORE YEARS) EMPLOYEES RECEIVING A SATISFACTORY EVALUATION Group Orientation Familiarize professional employee with the procedures. All forms are presented with an explanation of each form provided. This should Individual Goal setting meeting Formal Post-observation Feedback and Reflection Summative Evaluation and Conference be done both orally and in writing. Provide teacher with assistance in setting professional development goals and completing required form. Review Employee Portfolio. A minimum of 40 minutes is required for this observation. The intent is to observe an entire lesson. It is understood that a lesson may last longer than 40 minutes at some levels. that will form later conversations and judgments about the professional employee s professional practice. The evaluator will provide feedback to the professional employee regarding the evidence captured during the classroom observation. The professional employee will provide the evaluator his/her reflections. This conference focuses on the overall performance of the professional employee. Dates and times documenting the formal observations made by an administrator shall be included on the evaluation form. Reflection Sheet No later than the 10 th duty day of 1 st semester No later than September 30 Principal At least 1 formal observation of no less than 40 minutes in duration prior to February 15. Within 5 school days of the observation or at a mutually agreeable time. All Forms No later than February 15 employee bargaining unit may be different from those used by classroom professional employees. Page 12
20 EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR TENURED (FOUR OR MORE YEARS) EMPLOYEES FOUND TO BE AT RISK OF RECEIVING A PROBATIONARY RECOMMENDATION ON HER/HIS EVALUATION Group Orientation Familiarize professional employee with the procedures. All forms are presented with an explanation of each form provided. This should Individual Goal setting meeting Formal Post-observation Feedback and Reflection Meeting with Written Notice of Potential Job Jeopardy be done both orally and in writing. Provide teacher with assistance in setting professional development goals and completing required form. Review Employee Portfolio. A minimum of 20 minutes per observation is required. that will form later conversations and judgments about the professional employee s professional practice. The evaluator will provide feedback to the professional employee regarding the evidence captured during the classroom observation. The professional employee will provide the evaluator his/her reflections. The employee will receive a written improvement plan that includes established goals and a timeline that will result in the employee s professional improvement. The plan will be signed by both parties. Employee will receive written notice of potential probationary or non-renewal status. Reflection Sheet No later than the 10 th duty day of 1 st semester No later than September 30 Principal At least 3 formal observations of no less than 20 minutes in duration and limited to 1 per school day prior to February 15. Within 5 school days of the observation or at a mutually agreeable time. No later than December 1 By the end of first semester employee bargaining unit may be different from those used by classroom professional employees. Page 13
21 EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR TENURED (FOUR OR MORE YEARS) EMPLOYEES FOUND TO BE AT RISK OF RECEIVING A PROBATIONARY RECOMMENDATION ON HER/HIS EVALUATION Summative Evaluation and Conference This conference focuses on the overall performance of the professional employee. Dates and times documenting the formal observations made by an administrator shall be included on the evaluation form. All Forms No later than February 15 Meeting Request with Superintendent A copy of the probationary evaluation will be sent to the General Director of Human Resources. The employee may make a written request for a meeting with the Superintendent. Request within 5 school days of receiving the probationary evaluation employee Review of Probationary Evaluation Notice of Salary Increase Forfeit The superintendent shall review any probationary renewal evaluation and improvement plan. He/she will make the final determination whether it is for cause. The superintendent will give written notice that the salary increase has been forfeited. Meeting will be held within 10 days after the request is made or at a mutually agreeable time. employee and superintendent Superintendent Superintendent bargaining unit may be different from those used by classroom professional employees. Page 14
22 EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR TENURED (FOUR OR MORE YEARS) EMPLOYEES FOUND TO BE AT RISK OF RECEIVING A NON-RENEWAL RECOMMENDATION ON HER/HIS EVALUATION Group Orientation Familiarize professional employee with the procedures. All forms are presented with an explanation of each form provided. This should Individual Goal setting meeting Formal Post-observation Feedback and Reflection Meeting with and Written Improvement Plan Written Notice of Potential Job Jeopardy be done both orally and in writing. Provide teacher with assistance in setting professional development goals and completing required form. Review Employee Portfolio. A minimum of 20 minutes per observation is required. that will form later conversations and judgments about the professional employee s professional practice. The evaluator will provide feedback to the professional employee regarding the evidence captured during the classroom observation. The professional employee will provide the evaluator his/her reflections. The employee will receive a written improvement plan that includes established goals and a timeline that will result in the employee s professional improvement. The plan will be signed by both parties. Employee will receive written notice of potential non-renewal status. Reflection Sheet No later than the 10 th duty day of 1 st semester No later than September 30 Principal At least 3 formal observations of no less than 20 minutes in duration and limited to 1 per school day prior to February 15. Within 5 school days of the observation or at a mutually agreeable time. No later than December 1 with goals to be reached by February 15. No Later than December 1 employee bargaining unit may be different from those used by classroom professional employees. Page 15
23 EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR TENURED (FOUR OR MORE YEARS) EMPLOYEES FOUND TO BE AT RISK OF RECEIVING A NON-RENEWAL RECOMMENDATION ON HER/HIS EVALUATION Employee is required to observe another professional employee approved by the evaluator with the same curricular expertise in the building, district, or nearby district. by an appropriate District administrator. Development Summative Evaluation and Conference that will form later judgments about the professional employee s professional practice. Employee may be required to attend an inservice at the option of the administrator. This conference focuses on the overall performance of the professional employee. Dates and times documenting the formal observations made by an administrator shall be included on the evaluation form. A copy of the non-renewal evaluation will be sent to the General Director of Secondary Learning or General Director of Elementary Learning. One day 2 hours is responsible for facilitation is responsible for facilitation 1 day is responsible for facilitation All Forms No later than February 15 After the conference bargaining unit may be different from those used by classroom professional employees. Page 16
24 EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR TENURED (FOUR OR MORE YEARS) EMPLOYEES FOUND TO BE AT RISK OF RECEIVING A NON-RENEWAL RECOMMENDATION ON HER/HIS EVALUATION Meeting Request with The employee may make a written request for a meeting with the evaluator. The evaluator will explain the reasons for the non-renewal recommendation. Note: See Article 20 (Discipline, Suspension, Termination and Non-Renewal for due process procedures.) Request within 10 school days of the evaluation meeting. Meeting within 10 school days after request is made or a mutually agreeable time. employee for requesting the meeting. bargaining unit may be different from those used by classroom professional employees. Page 17
25 PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES WITH MORE THAN FOUR (4) YEARS OF SERVICE 1. employees with more than four (4) years service shall be evaluated at least once every three (3) years with the evaluation completed by February 15 of that year. 2. During the two years between evaluations, the employee will develop a portfolio of evidence documenting domains one (1) and four (4) of the Framework for Teaching. Components and elements of the domains are listed below. Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Domain 4: Responsibilities a. Demonstrating knowledge of content and pedagogy a. Reflecting on teaching -Knowledge of content -Accuracy -Knowledge of prerequisite relationships -Use in future teaching -Knowledge of content-related pedagogy b. Demonstrating knowledge of students b. Maintaining accurate records -Knowledge of characteristics of age group -Student completion of assignments -Knowledge of students varied approaches to learning -Student progress in learning -Knowledge of students skills and knowledge -Noninstructional records -Knowledge of students interests and cultural heritage c. Setting Instructional Outcomes c. Communicating with families -Value, sequence, and alignment -Information about the instructional program -Clarity -Information about individual students - Balance -Engagement of families in the instructional program - Suitability for diverse students d. Demonstrating knowledge of resources d. Participating in a Community -Resources for teaching -Relationships with colleagues -Resources for students -Service to the school. Involvement in a culture of professional inquiry -Participation in school and district projects e. Designing coherent instruction e. Growing and developing professionally -Learning activities -Enhancement of content knowledge and pedagogical skill -Instructional materials and resources -Receptivity to feedback from colleagues -Instructional groups -Service to the profession -Lesson and unit structure f. Designing Student Assessments f. Showing professionalism -Congruence with instructional outcomes - Integrity and ethical conduct -Criteria and standards -Service to students -Design of formative assessments -Advocacy -Use for planning -Decision making -Compliance with school and district regulations 3. The portfolio shall be presented to the evaluator at the goal setting conference that is conducted at the beginning of the evaluation year. bargaining unit may be different from those used by classroom professional employees. Page 18
Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools
Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools Updated November 2013 DC Public Charter School Board 3333 14 th Street NW, Suite 210 Washington, DC 20010 Phone: 202-328-2600 Fax: 202-328-2661 Table
More informationParaprofessional Evaluation: School Year:
Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year: 2014-2015 Name Evaluator Contributing Evaluator Program Grade Site Observat ion Date: Observation Date Post-Conference Date Additional Observation Date-As Needed
More informationDelaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators
Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators DPAS-II Guide (Revised) for Teachers Updated August 2017 Table of Contents I. Introduction to DPAS II Purpose of
More informationPEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)
PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12) Standard I.* Standard II.* Standard III.* Standard IV. The teacher designs instruction appropriate for all students that reflects an understanding
More informationKENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING
KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING With Specialist Frameworks for Other Professionals To be used for the pilot of the Other Professional Growth and Effectiveness System ONLY! School Library Media Specialists
More informationSPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM
SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM (Revised 11/2014) 1 Fern Ridge Schools Specialist Performance Review and Evaluation System TABLE OF CONTENTS Timeline of Teacher Evaluation and Observations
More informationIndicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.
Domain 1- The Learner and Learning 1a: Learner Development The teacher understands how learners grow and develop, recognizing that patterns of learning and development vary individually within and across
More information4a: Reflecting on Teaching
Domain 4: 4a: Reflecting on Teaching Professional Responsibilities Reflecting on teaching encompasses the teacher s thinking that follows any instructional event, an analysis of the many decisions made
More informationKelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)
Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association 2015-2017 Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP) Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association 2015-2017 Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP) TABLE
More informationWest Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA
Georgia Teacher Academy for Preparation and Pedagogy Pathways to Certification West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA 20220 770-583-2528 www.westgaresa.org 1 Georgia s Teacher Academy Preparation
More informationContract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)
Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4) Evidence Used in Evaluation Rubric (5) Evaluation Cycle: Training (6) Evaluation Cycle: Annual Orientation (7) Evaluation Cycle:
More informationFinal Teach For America Interim Certification Program
Teach For America Interim Certification Program Program Rubric Overview The Teach For America (TFA) Interim Certification Program Rubric was designed to provide formative and summative feedback to TFA
More informationSchool Leadership Rubrics
School Leadership Rubrics The School Leadership Rubrics define a range of observable leadership and instructional practices that characterize more and less effective schools. These rubrics provide a metric
More information$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF
$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF ROCKWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTENT FACILITATOR, DATA ANALYST, AND INSTRUCTIONAL
More informationCONTRACT TENURED FACULTY
APPENDIX D FORM A2 ADMINISTRATOR AND PEER EVALUATION FORM FOR CONTRACT TENURED FACULTY (The purposes of evaluation are described in Article 12 of the VCCCD Agreement) DATE OF VISIT: ARRIVAL TIME: DEPARTURE
More informationPromotion and Tenure Guidelines. School of Social Work
Promotion and Tenure Guidelines School of Social Work Spring 2015 Approved 10.19.15 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction..3 1.1 Professional Model of the School of Social Work...3 2.0 Guiding Principles....3
More informationDepartment of Communication Criteria for Promotion and Tenure College of Business and Technology Eastern Kentucky University
Department of Communication Criteria for Promotion and Tenure College of Business and Technology Eastern Kentucky University Policies governing key personnel actions are contained in the Eastern Kentucky
More informationReference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.
PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT FACULTY DEVELOPMENT and EVALUATION MANUAL Approved by Philosophy Department April 14, 2011 Approved by the Office of the Provost June 30, 2011 The Department of Philosophy Faculty
More informationWhat does Quality Look Like?
What does Quality Look Like? Directions: Review the new teacher evaluation standards on the left side of the table and brainstorm ideas with your team about what quality would look like in the classroom.
More informationDelaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators
Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators DPAS-II Guide for Administrators (Assistant Principals) Guide for Evaluating Assistant Principals Revised August
More informationCÉGEP HERITAGE COLLEGE POLICY #15
www.cegep-heritage.qc.ca CÉGEP HERITAGE COLLEGE POLICY #15 CONCERNING FACULTY EVALUATION COMING INTO FORCE: September 27, 2011 REVISED: ADMINISTRATOR: Academic Dean and Director of Human Resources 325,
More informationEnglish 491: Methods of Teaching English in Secondary School. Identify when this occurs in the program: Senior Year (capstone course), week 11
English 491: Methods of Teaching English in Secondary School Literacy Story and Analysis through Critical Lens Identify when this occurs in the program: Senior Year (capstone course), week 11 Part 1: Story
More informationMidterm Evaluation of Student Teachers
Midterm Evaluation of Student Teachers Please complete and return form to the EKU student teaching supervisor on or before midterm week Student Teacher EKU ID # Subject/ Grade(s) Cooperating Teacher s
More informationSACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports
Agenda Greetings and Overview SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports Quality Enhancement h t Plan (QEP) Discussion 2 Purpose Inform campus community about SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation
More informationScoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.
Adolescence and Young Adulthood SOCIAL STUDIES HISTORY For retake candidates who began the Certification process in 2013-14 and earlier. Part 1 provides you with the tools to understand and interpret your
More informationField Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program
Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program Together we Shape the Future through Excellence in Teaching, Scholarship, and Leadership College of Education
More informationAPPENDIX A-13 PERIODIC MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF FACULTY & LIBRARIANS (PMYR) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL
APPENDIX A-13 PERIODIC MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF FACULTY & LIBRARIANS (PMYR) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL PREAMBLE The practice of regular review of faculty and librarians based upon the submission of
More informationCollege of Science Promotion & Tenure Guidelines For Use with MU-BOG AA-26 and AA-28 (April 2014) Revised 8 September 2017
College of Science Promotion & Tenure Guidelines For Use with MU-BOG AA-26 and AA-28 (April 2014) Revised 8 September 2017 Introduction Marshall University Board of Governors (BOG) policies define the
More informationAssessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)
Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011) Health professions education programs - Conceptual framework The University of Rochester interdisciplinary program in Health Professions
More informationTEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS. Directive Teaching Quality Standard Applicable to the Provision of Basic Education in Alberta
Standards of Teaching Practice TEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS BASED ON: Policy, Regulations and Forms Manual Section 4 Ministerial Orders and Directives Directive 4.2.1 - Teaching Quality Standard Applicable
More informationCERTIFIED TEACHER LICENSURE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
CERTIFIED TEACHER LICENSURE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2016-2017 DODGE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS USD 443 DODGE CITY, KANSAS LOCAL PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDE Table of Contents 1. General Information -
More informationProviding Feedback to Learners. A useful aide memoire for mentors
Providing Feedback to Learners A useful aide memoire for mentors January 2013 Acknowledgments Our thanks go to academic and clinical colleagues who have helped to critique and add to this document and
More informationSTANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION
Arizona Department of Education Tom Horne, Superintendent of Public Instruction STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 5 REVISED EDITION Arizona Department of Education School Effectiveness Division
More informationLincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal
ISS Administrative Searches is pleased to announce Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal Seeks Elementary Principal Application Deadline: October 30, 2017 Visit the ISS Administrative Searches webpage to view
More informationDear Internship Supervisor:
Dear Internship Supervisor: Thank you for agreeing to supervise the internship of a Hunter College Geography student. I hope that this arrangement will benefit both your organization and our student. Student
More informationOklahoma State University Policy and Procedures
Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE PROCESS FOR RANKED FACULTY 2-0902 ACADEMIC AFFAIRS September 2015 PURPOSE The purpose of this policy and procedures letter
More informationIntervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015
Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State May 2015 The Law - Education Law Section 211-f and Receivership In April 2015, Subpart E of Part EE of Chapter 56 of the Laws of 2015
More informationCONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education
CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION Connecticut State Department of Education October 2017 Preface Connecticut s educators are committed to ensuring that students develop the skills and acquire
More informationPolicy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy
Policy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy This document outlines the policy for appointment, evaluation, promotion, non-renewal, dismissal,
More informationArkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio
Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio Guidelines, Rubrics, and Requirements 2 THE EXIT PORTFOLIO A s-based Presentation of Evidence for the Licensure of Beginning Teachers Purpose:
More informationMASTER OF EDUCATION DEGREE: PHYSICAL EDUCATION GRADUATE MANUAL
MASTER OF EDUCATION DEGREE: PHYSICAL EDUCATION GRADUATE MANUAL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, HUMAN PERFORMANCE & RECREATION November 2017 M.Ed. in Physical Education University of Arkansas Introduction The Master
More informationDESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0
DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0 QUALITY RUBRIC FOR STEM PHILANTHROPY This rubric aims to help companies gauge the quality of their philanthropic efforts to boost learning in science, technology, engineering
More informationOffice: Bacon Hall 316B. Office Phone:
Buffalo State College State University College at Buffalo Department of Elementary Education & Reading School of Education Course Information: PRACTICUM IN STUDENT TEACHING Course Number #: Semester: Spring
More informationDEPARTMENT OF KINESIOLOGY AND SPORT MANAGEMENT
DEPARTMENT OF KINESIOLOGY AND SPORT MANAGEMENT Undergraduate Sport Management Internship Guide SPMT 4076 (Version 2017.1) Box 43011 Lubbock, TX 79409-3011 Phone: (806) 834-2905 Email: Diane.nichols@ttu.edu
More informationKAHNAWÀ: KE EDUCATION CENTER P.O BOX 1000 KAHNAW À:KE, QC J0L 1B0 Tel: Fax:
KAHNAWÀ: KE EDUCATION CENTER P.O BOX 1000 KAHNAW À:KE, QC J0L 1B0 Tel: 450 632-8770 Fax: 450 632-8042 JOB DESCRIPTION SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER ASSISTANT August 2013 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION: The teacher assistant,
More informationA Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners
A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners About Our Approach At Pivot Learning Partners (PLP), we help school districts build the systems, structures, and processes
More informationChapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program
Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program Background Initial, Standard Professional I (SP I) licenses are issued to teachers with fewer than three years of appropriate teaching experience (normally
More informationUnit 3. Design Activity. Overview. Purpose. Profile
Unit 3 Design Activity Overview Purpose The purpose of the Design Activity unit is to provide students with experience designing a communications product. Students will develop capability with the design
More informationTRAITS OF GOOD WRITING
TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING Each paper was scored on a scale of - on the following traits of good writing: Ideas and Content: Organization: Voice: Word Choice: Sentence Fluency: Conventions: The ideas are clear,
More informationACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES
ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES Section 8: General Education Title: General Education Assessment Guidelines Number (Current Format) Number (Prior Format) Date Last Revised 8.7 XIV 09/2017 Reference: BOR Policy
More informationThink A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -
C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria Think A F R I C A - 1 - 1. The extracts in the left hand column are taken from the official descriptors of the CEFR levels. How would you grade them on a scale of low,
More informationCARITAS PROJECT GRADING RUBRIC
CARITAS PROJECT GRADING RUBRIC Student Name: Date: Evaluator Chair: Additional Evaluators: This rubric is designed to evaluate the whole of the Caritas Project from start to finish. This should be used
More informationACADEMIC AFFAIRS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL
ACADEMIC AFFAIRS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL 000 INTRODUCTORY MATERIAL Revised: March 12, 2012 The School of Letters and Sciences (hereafter referred to as school ) Academic Affairs Policies and Procedures
More informationIndiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process
Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning ICPBL Certification mission is to PBL Certification Process ICPBL Processing Center c/o CELL 1400 East Hanna Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46227 (317) 791-5702
More informationREVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED ON OR AFTER JULY 14, 2014 SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT
REVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED ON OR AFTER JULY 14, 2014 YEAR OF FOR WHAT SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT FIRST DEPARTMENT SPRING 2 nd * DEAN SECOND DEPARTMENT FALL 3 rd & 4
More informationEMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES
KAHNAWAKE EDUCATION CENTER P.O. BOX 1000 KAHNAWAKE, QUEBEC J0L 1B0 TEL: (450) 632-8770 FAX: (450) 632-8042 EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES LOCATION: POSITION: SALARY RANGE: DURATION: REQUIREMENTS: KARONHIANONHNHA
More informationDeveloping an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning
Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning By Peggy L. Maki, Senior Scholar, Assessing for Learning American Association for Higher Education (pre-publication version of article that
More informationPractice Learning Handbook
Southwest Regional Partnership 2 Step Up to Social Work University of the West of England Holistic Assessment of Practice Learning in Social Work Practice Learning Handbook Post Graduate Diploma in Social
More informationQueen's Clinical Investigator Program: In- Training Evaluation Form
Queen's Clinical Investigator Program: In- Training Evaluation Form Name of trainee: Date of meeting: Thesis/Project title: Can the project be completed within the recommended timelines 2 years MSc - 4/5
More informationSTUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION
300-37 Administrative Procedure 360 STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION Background Maintaining a comprehensive system of student assessment and evaluation is an integral component of the teaching-learning
More informationProfessional Experience - Mentor Information
Professional Experience - Mentor Information EDU10001 Introduction to curriculum planning and assessment: Practicum 1 Required days: 20 days full time. Any missed days must be made up. Required setting:
More informationPEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE
PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE DR. BEV FREEDMAN B. Freedman OISE/Norway 2015 LEARNING LEADERS ARE Discuss and share.. THE PURPOSEFUL OF CLASSROOM/SCHOOL OBSERVATIONS IS TO OBSERVE
More informationKentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations
Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning Included in this section are the: Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations Kentucky New Teacher Standards (Note: For your reference, the KDE website
More informationPOLICIES AND PROCEDURES
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON - CLEAR LAKE School of Education POLICIES AND PROCEDURES December 10, 2004 Version 8.3 SCHOOL OF EDUCATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE PREAMBLE...
More informationHIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN
HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview 1 Eligible Credit Flexibility Plans 2 Earned Credit from Credit Flexibility Plans 2 Student Athletes 3 Application Process 3 Final
More informationDigital Media Literacy
Digital Media Literacy Draft specification for Junior Cycle Short Course For Consultation October 2013 2 Draft short course: Digital Media Literacy Contents Introduction To Junior Cycle 5 Rationale 6 Aim
More informationArticle 15 TENURE. A. Definition
Article 15 TENURE A. Definition Tenure shall mean the right of a FACULTY MEMBER to hold his/her position and not to be removed therefrom except for just cause as hereinafter set forth in this Article or
More informationSCHOOL OF ART & ART HISTORY
JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY College of Visual and Performing Arts SCHOOL OF ART & ART HISTORY GRADUATE STUDIES HANDBOOK 2010 / 2011 Introduction Welcome to the graduate program in art! This Graduate Studies
More informationLecturer Promotion Process (November 8, 2016)
Introduction Lecturer Promotion Process (November 8, 2016) Lecturer faculty are full-time faculty who hold the ranks of Lecturer, Senior Lecturer, or Master Lecturer at the Questrom School of Business.
More informationEmergency Safety Interventions: Requirements
Emergency Safety Interventions: Requirements April 28, 2017 Topeka Public Schools David Eichler Project STAY Questions are Encouraged! If you wish to ask a question, raise your hand and an aisle runner
More informationWildlife, Fisheries, & Conservation Biology
Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, & Conservation Biology The Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, & Conservation Biology in the College of Natural Sciences, Forestry and Agriculture offers graduate study
More information(2) "Half time basis" means teaching fifteen (15) hours per week in the intern s area of certification.
16 KAR 7:010. Kentucky Teacher Internship Program. RELATES TO: KRS 156.101, 161.028, 161.030, 161.048, 161.095 STATUTORY AUTHORITY: KRS 161.028(1)(a), 161.030 NECESSITY, FUNCTION, AND CONFORMITY: KRS 161.030(5)
More informationIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Chief Academic Officer s Guidelines For Preparing and Reviewing Promotion and Tenure Dossiers
Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Chief Academic Officer s Guidelines For Preparing and Reviewing Promotion and Tenure Dossiers 2018-2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 4 Distinctions between
More informationPosition Statements. Index of Association Position Statements
ts Association position statements address key issues for Pre-K-12 education and describe the shared beliefs that direct united action by boards of education/conseil scolaire fransaskois and their Association.
More informationPractice Learning Handbook
Southwest Regional Partnership 2 Step Up to Social Work University of the West of England Holistic Assessment of Practice Learning in Social Work Practice Learning Handbook Post Graduate Diploma in Social
More informationSpring Valley Academy Credit Flexibility Plan (CFP) Overview
Overview Ohio Senate Bill 311 allows alternate pathways for those students who are eligible to receive high school credit through the use of Credit Flexibility Plans (CFPs). Spring Valley Academy students
More informationINDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM
INSTRUCTION BOARD POLICY BP6158 INDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM The Governing Board authorizes independent study as a voluntary alternative instructional setting by which students may reach curricular objectives
More informationProfessional Experience - Mentor Information
Professional Experience - Mentor Information EDU40006 Ready to Teach Early Childhood: Practicum 5E Required days: 20 days full time. Any missed days must be made up. Required setting: Preschool Early Childhood
More informationEDUC-E328 Science in the Elementary Schools
1 INDIANA UNIVERSITY NORTHWEST School of Education EDUC-E328 Science in the Elementary Schools Time: Monday 9 a.m. to 3:45 Place: Instructor: Matthew Benus, Ph.D. Office: Hawthorn Hall 337 E-mail: mbenus@iun.edu
More informationAssessment and Evaluation for Student Performance Improvement. I. Evaluation of Instructional Programs for Performance Improvement
Assessment and Evaluation for Student Performance Improvement I. Evaluation of Instructional Programs for Performance Improvement The ongoing evaluation of educational programs is essential for improvement
More informationWorkload Policy Department of Art and Art History Revised 5/2/2007
Workload Policy Department of Art and Art History Revised 5/2/2007 Workload expectations for faculty in the Department of Art and Art History, in the areas of teaching, research, and service, must be consistent
More informationCollege of Arts and Science Procedures for the Third-Year Review of Faculty in Tenure-Track Positions
College of Arts and Science Procedures for the Third-Year Review of Faculty in Tenure-Track Positions Introduction (Last revised December 2012) When the College of Arts and Sciences hires a tenure-track
More informationRED 3313 Language and Literacy Development course syllabus Dr. Nancy Marshall Associate Professor Reading and Elementary Education
RED 3313 Language and Literacy Development course syllabus Dr. Nancy Marshall Associate Professor Reading and Elementary Education Table of Contents Curriculum Background...5 Catalog Description of Course...5
More informationUSC VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
USC VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING APPOINTMENTS, PROMOTIONS AND TENURE (APT) GUIDELINES Office of the Dean USC Viterbi School of Engineering OHE 200- MC 1450 Revised 2016 PREFACE This document serves as
More informationTITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL PART 25 CERTIFICATION
ISBE 23 ILLINOIS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 25 TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES : EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION : PERSONNEL Section 25.10 Accredited Institution PART 25 CERTIFICATION
More informationLoyola University Chicago Chicago, Illinois
Loyola University Chicago Chicago, Illinois 2010 GRADUATE SECONDARY Teacher Preparation Program Design D The design of this program does not ensure adequate subject area preparation for secondary teacher
More informationAchievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition
Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition Georgia Department of Education September 2015 All Rights Reserved Achievement Levels and Achievement Level Descriptors With the implementation
More informationCalifornia Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)
Standard 1 STANDARD 1: DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A SHARED VISION Education leaders facilitate the development and implementation of a shared vision of learning and growth of all students. Element
More informationCOLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING CLINICAL FACULTY POLICY AND PROCEDURES
1 COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING CLINICAL FACULTY POLICY AND PROCEDURES Definition of Clinical Faculty A Clinical Faculty member in the Department of Marketing (Marketing) is
More informationStandards for Professional Practice
Standards for Professional Practice 1.0. Teaching and Assessment 1.1. Systematically individualize instructional variables to maximize the learning outcomes of individuals with exceptionalities. 1.2. Identify
More informationTentative School Practicum/Internship Guide Subject to Change
04/2017 1 Tentative School Practicum/Internship Guide Subject to Change Practicum and Internship Packet For Students, Interns, and Site Supervisors COUN 6290 School Counseling Practicum And COUN 6291 School
More informationGain an understanding of the End of Year Documentation Process. Gain an understanding of Support
Objectives Gain an understanding of the End of Year Documentation Process Gain an understanding of the Summative Evaluation Process Revisit the Four Level Ratings Rubric Gain an understanding of Support
More informationINSTRUCTIONAL PERSONNEL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM PROCEDURES MANUAL
INSTRUCTIONAL PERSONNEL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM PROCEDURES MANUAL ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA 2010-2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS TOPIC PAGE INTRODUCTION... 2 PHILOSOPHY... 2 COLLABORATION...
More informationACCREDITATION STANDARDS
ACCREDITATION STANDARDS Description of the Profession Interpretation is the art and science of receiving a message from one language and rendering it into another. It involves the appropriate transfer
More informationBEFORE THE ARBITRATOR. In the matter of the arbitration of a dispute between ADMINISTRATORS' AND SUPERVISORS' COUNCIL. And
BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR In the matter of the arbitration of a dispute between ADMINISTRATORS' AND SUPERVISORS' COUNCIL And MILWAUKEE BOARD OF SCHOOL DIRECTORS Case 428 No. 64078 Rosana Mateo-Benishek Demotion
More informationState Parental Involvement Plan
A Toolkit for Title I Parental Involvement Section 3 Tools Page 41 Tool 3.1: State Parental Involvement Plan Description This tool serves as an example of one SEA s plan for supporting LEAs and schools
More informationKarla Brooks Baehr, Ed.D. Senior Advisor and Consultant The District Management Council
Karla Brooks Baehr, Ed.D. Senior Advisor and Consultant The District Management Council This paper aims to inform the debate about how best to incorporate student learning into teacher evaluation systems
More informationDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure and Cumulative Post-Tenure Review Policies and Procedures TABLE OF CONTENTS Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure 1. Role of Plant
More informationRecording Form. Part One: Oral Reading. Recording Form. Snake Myths Level O Nonfiction
Student Grade _ Date Teacher School Part One: Oral Reading Place the book in front of the student. Read the title and introduction. Introduction: People tell myths, or stories that might not be true, about
More informationHiring Procedures for Faculty. Table of Contents
Hiring Procedures for Faculty Table of Contents SECTION I: PROCEDURES FOR NEW FULL-TIME FACULTY APPOINTMENTS... 2 A. Search Committee... 2 B. Applicant Clearinghouse Form and Applicant Data Sheet... 2
More information