Section 1. Health Related Institutions Summary of Recommendations - House Base. Biennial Change Recommended

Transcription

1 Section 1 Summary of Recommendations - House Page III-159 Method of Financing Base Recommended Emily Hoffman, LBB Analyst Biennial Change % Change General Revenue Funds $2,532,710,980 $2,593,040,777 $60,329, % GR Dedicated Funds $188,384,224 $183,485,941 ($4,898,283) (2.6%) Total GR-Related Funds $2,721,095,204 $2,776,526,718 $55,431, % RECOMMENDED FUNDING BY METHOD OF FINANCING GR Dedicated Other Funds 0.2% 35.3% Federal Funds $0 $0 $0 % Other $136,837,455 $109,444,735 ($27,392,720) 720) (2%) 0%) All Funds $2,857,932,659 $2,885,971,453 $28,038, % FY 2015 Budgeted FY 2017 Recommended Biennial Change % Change FTEs 12, ,561.8 (307.1) (2.4%) General Revenue Funds 64.5% 1

2 Section 2 Summary of Recommendations - House, By Method of Finance -- GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS Base Recommended Difference % Change General Revenue Funds $2,532,710,980 $2,593,040,777 $60,329, % Strategy/Goal Recommended Comments Formula General Revenue $1,740,521,436 The recommended formula General Revenue total is an increase of $60.6 million from the base. Formula fiscal and policy issues are detailed in Section 3. Instruction and Operations $1,059,406,584 Recommendations include an increase of $39.9 million in General Revenue to maintain the Instruction and Operations rate from the biennium. Infrastructure Support $237,527,715 Research $72,390,578 Recommendations include an overall increase of $1.5 million to maintain the Infrastructure Support rate from the biennium for all institutions except The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center and The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler. Recommendations increase the General Revenue rate for The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center and The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler to the average General Revenue rate of the other institutions. Recommendations also fund updated predicted square feet including research performed under contract with a clinical partner at all institutions. Recommendations include an increase of $3.7 million to maintain the Research Enhancement rate from the biennium with updated research expenditures including research performed under contract with a clinical partner at all institutions. 2

3 Section 2 Summary of Recommendations - House, By Method of Finance -- GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS Strategy/Goal Graduate Medical Education Recommended $57,447,000 Comments Recommendations include an increase of $3.7 million to maintain the Graduate Medical Education rate from the biennium. Cancer Center Operations Chest Disease Center Operations $257,089,043 $56,660,516 Recommendations include an increase of $9.6 million to fund the Cancer Center Operations formula at the average growth in General Revenue funding for the Instruction and Operations formula in the biennium. Recommendations include an increase of $2.1 million to fund the Chest Disease Center Operations formula at the average growth in General Revenue funding for the Instruction and Operations formula in the biennium. Non-Formula General Revenue $852,519,341 The recommended non-formula General Revenue total is a decrease of $0.2 million from the base amounts. Non-formula fiscal and policy issues are detailed in Section 3. Special Items $372,934,893 Recommendations provide funding at the appropriated amounts. Tuition Revenue Bond Debt Service Hospital/Dental Clinic Operations $168,432,346 Recommendations fund tuition revenue bond debt service at requested amounts for existing projects. Tuition revenue bond debt service is a decrease of $0.2 million from the base amount. See Section 3H for expended/budgeted amounts and requested amounts by each institution. $299,609,990 Recommendations provide funding at the appropriated amounts. 3

4 Section 2 Summary of Recommendations - House, By Method of Finance -- GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS Strategy/Goal Unemployment Insurance and Workers' Compensation Insurance Recommended $3,597,736 Comments Recommendations provide funding at the appropriated amounts. Facilities Operations $7,944,376 Recommendations include funding for debt service at the Texas A&M University Health Science Center Round Rock facility and a facility lease for the University of North Texas Health Science Center at requested amounts. 4

5 Section 2 Summary of Recommendations - House, By Method of Finance -- GR DEDICATED Base Recommended Difference % Change General Revenue-Dedicated Funds $188,384,224 $183,485,941 ($4,898,283) (2.6%) General Comments on General Revenue-Dedicated Funding. During the biennium, General Revenue-Dedicated appropriations, composed primarily of statutory tuition, totaled $157.3 million. Appropriated tuition amounts are estimated. The base General Revenue-Dedicated amounts reflect actual tuition collections by the institutions. Institutions collected $188.4 million in statutory tuition for the biennium, an increase of $31.1 million over the appropriated levels. Recommended General Revenue-Dedicated Funds for the biennium total $183.5 million, an increase of $26.2 million over appropriated levels. Listed below are the General Revenue-Dedicated funding changes for recommended amounts from appropriated levels. Strategy/Goal Recommended Comments Formula General Revenue-Dedicated $139,311,105 The recommended formula General Revenue-Dedicated total is an increase of $19.3 million from the appropriated amounts. Instruction and Operations $77,939,228 Infrastructure Support $18,262,291 Board Authorized Tuition $43,109,586 In addition to the formula allocated General Revenue-Dedicated funds, the formula strategy recommendations include Board Authorized Tuition increases, which are not used to offset General Revenue in the formula. This is an increase of $6.2 million over appropriated amounts. 5

6 Section 2 Summary of Recommendations - House, By Method of Finance -- GR DEDICATED Strategy/Goal Non-Formula General Revenue-Dedicated Recommended $44,174,836 Comments The recommendations include an increase of $0.7 million over appropriated amounts in statutory tuition. Non-formula General Revenue-Dedicated recommendations are found in the strategies listed below. Non-formula fiscal and policy issues are detailed in Section 3. Staff Group Insurance Texas Public Education Grants (TPEG) $23,396,254 $19,079,086 Funding for TPEG comes from the portion of statutory tuition set aside to fund scholarships, and as the total tuition estimate changes, so does the portion set aside for TPEG. Medical Loans $1,592,620 Funding reflects the portion of statutory tuition set aside for repayment of student loans of physicians serving in designated state agencies or economically distressed or rural medically underserved areas. GR-D Advisory Commission on Emergency Communications Account No $106,876 Recommendations include requested amounts related to the University of Texas Medical Branch's East Texas Area Health Education Centers. 6

7 Section 2 Summary of Recommendations - House, By Method of Finance -- OTHER FUNDS Base Recommended Difference % Change Other Funds $136,837,455 $109,444,735 ($27,392,720) (2%) Strategy/Goal Recommended Comments Tobacco Funds $97,984,970 Recommendations include Tobacco Funds at requested levels, a $27.4 million decrease from base amounts. Interagency Contracts $11,459,765 Recommendations include interagency contracts at requested amounts at The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston and University of North Texas Health Science Center. This results in level funding from the biennium. 7

8 Section 3 Selected Fiscal and Policy Issues - House 1. Funding Overview for (HRIs). Appropriations for HRIs are composed mainly of General Revenue, General Revenue- Dedicated (GR-D) funds, which are primarily statutory tuition and fee revenue, and Other funds for tobacco endowment earnings. Appropriations are provided to HRIs as lump sum amounts. Unlike other state agencies, higher education institutions are not bound to spend the appropriation within the specified strategy. HRIs also collect non-appropriated funds including designated funds (e.g., designated tuition, interest on local funds, restricted funds, earnings on endowments, contracts, grants and gifts), auxiliary income, and patient income. These funds are not included in the General Appropriations Act (GAA). While the General Revenue appropriated to an HRI is sum certain, the appropriation of GR-D funds for statutory tuition is estimated. If tuition revenue collected by an institution is different than the amount appropriated in a biennium, the institution adjusts spending to the revenue collected. Recommended GR-D levels are set based on a tuition estimate performed by the LBB based on the most recent year of tuition collections at an institution. Since GR-D varies for institutions each biennium from appropriated levels based on tuition collections, comparisons are performed against the appropriated level to provide an accurate view of the funding change between biennia. HRIs are appropriated funding primarily through the following: formula funding, tuition revenue bond debt service, certain hospital and dental clinic operations, special items and tobacco endowment funds. The funding formulas for health-related institutions include Instruction and Operations Support, Infrastructure Support, Research Enhancement, Graduate Medical Education, and mission specific funding for The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center and The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler. Each formula is based on different drivers, such as student enrollment or space needs, and for specific purposes. See Section 3 D Total Formula Recommendations Compared to Formula Drivers for the data used in each formula. This data is provided by the HRIs to the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB). THECB compiles the data and provides the information to the LBB. In addition, each HRI submits a Legislative Appropriations Request (LAR) for non formula General Revenue funding. Since formula funding varies each biennium due to changes in the institution s enrollment and other formula drivers, the institutions do not request this funding. 2. Major Method of Finance Adjustments. a. General Revenue increase of $60.3 million over base level: formula funding increase of $60.6 million offset by a $0.2 million decrease in tuition revenue bond debt service. b. General Revenue-Dedicated increase of $26.2 million over appropriated level: Statutory tuition increase of $2 million and Board Authorized Tuition increase of $6.2 million. c. Other Funds decrease of $27.4 million in requested amounts. Sec 3_Fiscal and Policy Issues 2/13/2015 8

9 Section 3 Formula Funding Methodology. Section 3B details the growth calculations used to determine the cost to maintain rates for each of the formulas. 3. Instructions and Operations (I&O) Formula. Recommendations maintain the I&O rate of $9,527 annually per weighted full time student equivalent (FTSE). Recommendations total $1,059.4 million in General Revenue and $77.9 million in statutory tuition. Recommendations fund the cost of enrollment growth with an increase of $39.9 million in General Revenue over funding level and $13.4 million in statutory tuition. Small Class Supplement: Instructional programs at an institution with enrollments of less than 200 students receive a small class supplement of $30,000 per FTSE for dental or medical programs and $20,000 per FTSE for all other programs. The amount received per student decreases with each additional student added to the program up to 200 students. o Recommendations include $39.2 million for the Small Class Supplement, a decrease of $6.4 million from the biennium. Section 3G provides information on institutions receiving this supplement. For the purpose of calculating the Small Class Supplement, the recommendations include funding based on the total number of students for all disciplines in an individual program at a campus. Recommendations for the small class supplement also include funding for individual programs only at remote campuses and the main campus at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler. In the biennium, the Small Class Supplement was provided to programs with less than 200 students at both remote campuses and in the same city as the main campus. Baylor College of Medicine is authorized to receive funding for undergraduate medical education based on funding provided for The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston and The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in accordance with Texas Education Code, Section Using the calculation methodology, the undergraduate medical education for totals $77.0 million, an increase of $3.4 million from the appropriated level. Funding for undergraduate medical education at Baylor College of Medicine is appropriated through THECB s bill pattern and will be presented with the THECB s funding recommendations. 4. Infrastructure Support Formula. Recommendations maintain the Infrastructure rate for all institutions, except The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (MD Anderson) and The University of Texas Health Science Center (UTHSC) at Tyler, at $6.63 annually per predicted square foot. Recommendations fund the Infrastructure rate for MD Anderson and UTHSC Tyler at $6.24 annually per predicted square foot, an increase from the Infrastructure rate of $6.09 annually per predicted square feet. The increase is due to an additional $1.4 million in General Revenue provided to the two institutions to increase the General Revenue rate to align with the average General Revenue rate at the other institutions. o MD Anderson Cancer Center and UTHSC Tyler have historically been funded at a lower All Funds Infrastructure rate as the two institutions did not contribute statutory tuition to the Infrastructure formula when it was established. Both institutions contribute statutory tuition to the Infrastructure formula for the biennium. Recommendations total $237.5 million in General Revenue and $18.3 million in statutory tuition. Recommendations fund the change in predicted square feet and the increased rate for MD Anderson and UTHSC Tyler with an increase of $1.5 million in General Revenue and $5.9 million in statutory tuition. Sec 3_Fiscal and Policy Issues 2/13/2015 9

10 Section 3 5. Research Enhancement Formula. Recommendations maintain the rate of 1.22 percent for the research enhancement formula. This formula provides base funding of $1,412,500 per year to each institution plus 1.22 percent of the institution s fiscal year 2013 research expenditures as reported to THECB. Recommendations for the Research Enhancement formula total $72.4 million in General Revenue, an increase of $3.7 million in General Revenue over funding level. Of this amount, $2.8 million is for base funding at Texas Tech Health Sciences Center at El Paso as a stand-alone institution. 6. Infrastructure Support and Research Enhancement Formula Drivers. Data elements in the Infrastructure Support formula (predicted square feet) and Research Enhancement formula (research expenditures) incorporate research conducted by faculty under contract at a clinical partner for all institutions for the formula allocation. Prior to the biennium, predicted square feet and research expenditures only included research conducted by faculty at a clinical partner for Texas A&M University Health Science Center. This resulted in an increase in predicted square feet and research expenditures for The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. 7. Graduate Medical Education (GME) Formula. Recommendations maintain the rate of $5,122 per medical resident in an accredited program. Recommendations for the GME formula at the HRIs total $57.4 million in General Revenue, an increase of $3.7 million in General Revenue over funding level. Baylor College of Medicine receives funding through the GME formula for medical residents in accordance with Texas Education Code, Section Using the calculation methodology, the graduate medical education for totals $12.8 million, an increase of $0.8 million from the appropriated level. Funding for graduate medical education at Baylor College of Medicine is appropriated through THECB s bill pattern and will be presented with the THECB s funding recommendations. 8. Mission Specific Formulas. Recommendations increase the Cancer Center Operations Formula (Mission specific formula for MD Anderson) and Chest Disease Center Operations Formula (Mission specific formula for UTHSC Tyler) by the average growth in General Revenue funding recommended for the I&O formula. Non-Formula Funding 9. Non-Formula General Revenue Strategies. Recommendations include funding for special items, hospital and dental clinic operations, unemployment and workers compensation insurance, and lease of facilities at the appropriated amounts. 10. Tuition Revenue Bonds. Recommendations for tuition revenue bond debt service for existing projects are provided at requested amounts. The recommended amount of $168.4 million is a $0.2 million decrease compared to base amounts. See Section 3H for budgeted/expended and requested amounts for each institution. 11. Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Methodology. Recommendations set the FTE cap at the lower number between fiscal year 2014 actual FTE levels (the most recent data available) or the institutions requested amounts. Sec 3_Fiscal and Policy Issues 2/13/

11 Section Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center. Recommendations include a new bill pattern for Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (TTUHSC) at El Paso. Appropriations for TTUHSC at El Paso were included with TTUHSC at Lubbock during the biennium. TTUHSC at El Paso became a stand-alone institution in May 2013 with the passage of SB120, Eighty-third Legislature, Regular Session. 13. The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (UTRGV) School of Medicine. Recommendations include the creation of a new bill pattern for The UTRGV School of Medicine and include the reallocation of $31.4 million in General Revenue funding from The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (UTHSC-SA) to UTRGV School of Medicine. This bill pattern is separate from The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (UTRGV), which is included with the general academic institutions. During the biennium, the $31.4 million in appropriations had previously been provided to UTHSC-SA for the Regional Academic Health Center (RAHC) special item ($30.6 million) and Family Practice Residency Training Program special item ($0.8 million). This funding was reallocated to UTRGV School of Medicine to support the establishment, operation, or administration of the medical school and the RAHC. Recommendations also provide the following riders for UTRGV School of Medicine: Authority to transfer School of Medicine appropriations to UTHSC-SA for services relating to the establishment, operation, and administration of the RAHC or the School of Medicine. Authority to enter into an agreement with UTRGV for administrative services until the School of Medicine becomes fully operational. A reporting requirement to provide information to the Legislative Budget Board and Governor on research expenditures at UTRGV School of Medicine independent of research at UTRGV. A reporting requirement to provide information to the Legislative Budget Board and Governor on benefit expenditures at UTRGV School of Medicine independent of benefit expenditures at UTRGV. See Section 3A Selected Policy Overview - Integration of (HRI) and General Academic Institutions (GAI) for additional information. Sec 3_Fiscal and Policy Issues 2/13/

12 Section 3A Integration of (HRI) and General Academic Institutions (GAI) Selected Policy Overview - House Background. Prior to the Eighty-third Legislative Session, all public medical schools in Texas were located at health related institutions (HRI) and were not directly associated with a general academic institution (GAI). During the current biennium, several institutions have realized an integration of medical schools within a GAI: Texas A&M University Health Sciences Center (TAMUHSC) and Texas A&M University (TAMU): On July 15, 2013, TAMUHSC completed its realignment under TAMU as an academic unit within the university after previously operating as separate entities since TAMUHSC s creation in Below is a brief summary of how the two institutions have aligned individual functions: o Budget Structure: TAMU and TAMUHSC each maintain a separate bill pattern, agency code, and participate in formula funding and legislative discussions as a GAI and HRI, respectively. o Formula Funding: TAMU and TAMUHSC each receive formula funding through the GAI and HRI formulas, respectively. When beginning a new program, the institution chooses whether it will be done through TAMU and TAMUHSC and thus, receive the corresponding formula funding. o Research Considerations: TAMU and TAMUHSC each maintain separate accounting of research expenditures based on the principal investigator. The research expenditures are reported to the state under the separate entities. TAMU does not receive any allocation of funds from research funds designated for GAIs for research generated through TAMUHSC and vice versa. The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (UTRGV) School of Medicine: Senate Bill (SB) 24, Eighty-third Legislative Session, established UTRGV as a GAI comprised of components including a medical school and the Lower Rio Grande Valley Academic Health Center authorized by Texas Education Code Section 74, Subchapter N and Subchapter L, respectively. The Lower Rio Grande Valley Academic Health Center is currently managed by The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (UTHSC-SA). The center is referred to as the Regional Academic Health Center (RAHC) and UTHSC-SA received $30.6 million for this special item during the biennium. Of this funding, $1 million over the biennium was contingency funding provided to UTHSC-SA to implement the provisions of SB24, Eighty-third Legislature, UTRGV s enabling statute. The RAHC is intended to provide the basis of UTRGV School of Medicine. The UTRGV School of Medicine is scheduled to open in fall UTHSC-SA will continue to matriculate students through the RAHC until The University of Texas (UT) at Austin Dell Medical School: UT Austin notified the Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) of the establishment of a new medical program in February UT Austin did not receive direct appropriations for the Dell Medical School during the biennium and the school is scheduled to open in fall Items for Consideration and Items Included in Recommendations for the Biennium Issue #1. Budget Structure. The introduced bill includes funding for a medical school in a separate bill pattern from its affiliated GAI for UTRGV and UTRGV School of Medicine. This methodology is consistent with the structure of TAMU and TAMUHSC. Included in Recommendations: Appropriations for the UTRGV School of Medicine are provided in a new bill pattern and include $15.7 million each year of the biennium reallocated from funding provided to UTHSC-SA during the biennium for the RAHC and Family Practice Residency Training Program. Authority is also provided to allow UTRGV School of Medicine, UTRGV, and UTHSC-SA to transfer funding between the institutions relating to the establishment, operation, and administration of the RAHC and School of Medicine. UTRGV and UTRGV School of Medicine are provided authority to enter into an agreement for UTRGV to provide administrative services to the UTRGV School of Medicine until the school becomes fully operational. Currently, there are no recommendations for appropriations related to UT Austin Dell Medical School for the biennium. 2/13/

13 Section 3A Issue #2: Formula Funding. HRIs and GAIs both receive formula funding through separate allocations for instruction and operations and infrastructure. Included in Recommendations: None. UTRGV School of Medicine and UT Austin will not have any medical students during the base period of formula funding for the biennium and will not receive an allocation for these formulas. There would not be a fiscal implication until the biennium. Issue #3. Higher Education Employees Group Insurance (HEGI). UT Austin and UTRGV receive appropriations through the HEGI bill pattern based on employees at the institution as of Dec. 1, Employees associated with the Dell Medical School are included in the UT Austin HEGI appropriation. Employees of the RAHC are currently funded within the UTHSC-SA appropriation for HEGI. Included in Recommendations: Recommendations include a rider allowing the transfer of funding between UTHSC-SA, UTRGV, and UTRGV School of Medicine to fund group insurance costs for employees of the UTRGV School of Medicine at the discretion of the chief administrative officer of The UT System. Issue #4. Research Considerations. There are four research funds that provide funding to support research at GAIs. Research Funds: The Available National Research University Fund (NRUF) and the Texas Research Incentive Program (TRIP) are research funds established for institutions designated as emerging research universities by the THECB Accountability System and meeting certain criteria specified in the Constitution and statute, respectively. The Comprehensive Research Fund (CRF) provides appropriations to general academic institutions, except UT Austin, TAMU, and emerging research universities. The Texas Research University Fund (TRUF) provides appropriations to UT Austin and TAMU. UTRGV is not expected to be classified as an emerging research university during the upcoming biennium. o LBB Considerations for TRUF and CRF: The Legislature appropriates TRUF and CRF directly to institutions based on research expenditures at each institution. In future biennia, the Legislature can choose whether to include research funds generated by medical schools in the distribution calculation for either fund. o LBB Considerations for NRUF and TRIP: A change in statute would be required to prohibit UTRGV from using research funding generated by the associated medical school to reach emerging research university status and/or to receive appropriations from NRUF or TRIP once that status and other criteria is attained. UT Austin is not eligible for either of these funds and would not be impacted by Dell Medical School. Research Enhancement Formula: The HRIs receive funding through the research enhancement formula based on research expenditures in the most recent fiscal year. There is no research generated by the UTRGV School of Medicine or Dell Medical School in the base period for the biennium. Included in Recommendations: In preparation for the biennium, recommendations include a reporting requirement for UT Austin, UTRGV, and UTRGV School of Medicine to provide the LBB and the Governor s Office with information on research expenditures at the medical school during the biennium. Issue #5. Benefits. Both UT Austin and UTRGV receive benefit appropriations through the Teachers Retirement System (TRS), Optional Retirement Program (ORP), and social security. TRS, ORP, and social security are estimated appropriations and are based on actual benefit expenditures. UTRGV School of Medicine will also participate in these benefit programs during the biennium. Included in Recommendations: In preparation for the biennium, recommendations include a reporting requirement for UT Austin, UTRGV, and UTRGV School of Medicine to provide the LBB and the Governor s Office with information on benefit expenditures at the medical school during the biennium. 2/13/

14 Section 3B : General Revenue and General Revenue Dedicated Formulas Cost Methodology To Maintain Rates - House Recommendations maintain rate for Instruction and Operations for all institutions and the Infrastructure formula for all institutions except UTHSC Tyler and MD Anderson. Recommendations increase the Infrastructure rate at UTHSC Tyler and MD Anderson to the average General Revenue rate of the other institutions. Instruction and Operations Formula Cost Methodology Cost of Weighted Full Time Student Equivalent Growth Base Period (Summer 2012, Fall 2012, Spring 2013) Weighted Full Time Student Equivalent 54,500 Estimated Weighted Full Time Student Equivalent 57,634 Estimated Weighted Full Time Student Equivalent Change 3,134 Estimated Weighted Full Time Student Equivalent Growth, Percent 5.8% Weighted Full Time Student Equivalent Rate $9, Estimated Growth Cost (rate times WFTSE change) $59,718,156 Increase in statutory tuition (GR-D 770) for Instructions and Operations from to $13,419,943 Estimated Growth Cost of Weighted FTSEs $46,298,213 Cost of Small Class Supplement Small Class Supplement 45,555, Small Class Supplement 39,199, Small Class Supplement Cost $ (6,355,736) Grand Total $39,942,477 Infrastructure Formula Cost Methodology Cost of Predicted Square Feet Growth - All HRIs except MD Anderson and UTHSC Tyler Base Period (Summer 2012, Fall 2012, Spring 2013) Predicted Square Feet 14,669,259 Estimated Predicted Square Feet* 14,888,554 Estimated Predicted Square Feet Change 219,295 Estimated Predicted Square Feet Growth, Percent 1.5% Predicted Square Foot Rate $6.63 Estimated Growth Cost (rate times Pred. Sq. Ft. change) $2,907,519 Increase in statutory tuition (GR-D 770) for Infrastructure from to $5,451,883 Estimated Growth Cost of Predicted Square Feet, All HRIs except MD Anderson and UTHSC Tyler $ (2,544,364) Cost of Predicted Square Feet Growth for MD Anderson and UTHSC Tyler Base Period (Summer 2012, Fall 2012, Spring 2013) Predicted Square Feet 4,422,796 Estimated Predicted Square Feet* 4,676,454 Estimated Predicted Square Feet Change 253,658 Estimated Predicted Square Feet Growth, Percent 5.7% Predicted Square Foot Rate $6.09 Estimated Growth Cost (rate times Pred. Sq. Ft. change) $3,089,365 Increase in statutory tuition (GR-D 770) for Infrastructure from to $430,775 Estimated Growth Cost of Predicted Square Feet for MD Anderson and UTHSC Tyler $2,658,590 Grand Total $114,226 *Predicted square feet and research expenditures for the biennium formula allocations includes research conducted by faculty at a clinical partner for all institutions. Predicted square feet and research expenditures for the biennium only includes research conducted by faculty at a clinical partner for Texas A&M University Health Science Center.

15 Section 3B (continued) : General Revenue Formulas Cost Methodology to Maintain Rates - House LBB Recommendations maintain rate for Research Enhancement and Graduate Medical Education and increase mission specific formulas up to average growth in I&O Formula General Revenue Funding. Research Enhancement Formula Cost Methodology Cost of Research Expenditures Growth Base Period: Fiscal Year 2012 Research Expenditures 1,776,880, Research Expenditures* 1,813,119,031 Increase in Research Expenditures 36,238,780 Annual Research Formula Rate 1.22% Estimated Growth Cost of Research Expenditures** $882,237 **Excludes cost of $1.4 million each year for base support funding at Texas Tech HSC El Paso Graduate Medical Education Cost Methodology Cost of Medical Residents Growth Base Period (as of September 1, 2012) Residents 6, Residents 6,855 Increase in Residents 443 Annual Rate Per Resident $5, Estimated Growth Cost of Medical Residents $4,537,985 Cancer Center Operations (MD Anderson Cancer Center Mission Specific) Cost Methodology Cost of Texas Cancer Patients Growth Formula Funding $247,535, Base Period: Fiscal Year 2012 Texas Cancer Patients 63, Texas Cancer Patients 71,441 Increase in Texas Cancer Patients 7,775 Annual Rate Per Texas Cancer Patient $1,944 Estimated Growth Cost of Texas Cancer Patients $30,229,510 Percentage Increase in Formula Funding 12.2% Percentage Funding Increase Limited to I&O Funding Growth I&O General Revenue Funding Percentage Growth 3.9% General Revenue Cost $9,553,099 Chest Disease Center Operations (UTHSC-Tyler Mission Specific) Cost Methodology Cost of Chest Disease Cases Growth Formula Funding $54,555, Base Period: Fiscal Year 2012 Chest Disease Cases 72, Chest Disease Cases 135,644 Increase in Chest Disease Cases 63,506 Annual Rate Per Chest Disease Cases $378 Estimated Growth Cost of Texas Cancer Patients $48,027,048 Percentage Increase in Formula Funding 88.0% Percentage Funding Increase Limited to I&O Funding Growth I&O General Revenue Funding Percentage Growth 3.9% Funding Growth in Chest Disease Formula $2,105,432 *Predicted square feet and research expenditures for the biennium formula allocations includes research conducted by faculty at a clinical partner for all institutions. Predicted square feet and research expenditures for the biennium only includes research conducted by faculty at a clinical partner for Texas A&M University Health Science Center. Sec 3_WSCH Growth 2/13/2015

16 Section 3C Total Formula Recommendations Compared to Base House Formula Formula Formula % GR Formula Formula Formula % GR D 770 Total Formula Total Formula Total Formula % All Funds Instruction and Operations General Revenue General Revenue GR Variance GR D 770 GR D 770 GR D 770 Variance All Funds All Funds All Funds Variance Difference Biennium Difference Biennium Difference Biennium UT Southwestern Medical Center $ 104,814,783 $ 102,488,345 $ (2,326,438) 2.2% $ 5,540,799 $ 7,719,103 $ 2,178, % $ 110,355,582 $ 110,207,448 $ (148,134) 0.1% UT Medical Branch at Galveston $ 118,546,721 $ 125,543,283 $ 6,996, % $ 10,153,777 $ 13,657,215 $ 3,503, % $ 128,700,498 $ 139,200,498 $ 10,500, % UT Health Science Center at Houston $ 197,580,677 $ 194,425,072 $ (3,155,605) 1.6% $ 9,606,093 $ 13,576,004 $ 3,969, % $ 207,186,770 $ 208,001,076 $ 814, % UT Health Science Center at San Antonio $ 161,220,352 $ 162,390,197 $ 1,169, % $ 8,776,588 $ 8,203,503 $ (573,085) 6.5% $ 169,996,940 $ 170,593,700 $ 596, % UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center $ 6,938,914 $ 6,642,064 $ (296,850) 4.3% $ 162,406 $ 247,378 $ 84, % $ 7,101,320 $ 6,889,442 $ (211,878) 3.0% UT Health Science Center at Tyler $ 227,450 $ 815,173 $ 587, % $ $ 99,327 $ 99,327 NA $ 227,450 $ 914,500 $ 687, % Texas A&M University Health Science Center $ 150,320,043 $ 157,513,307 $ 7,193, % $ 8,920,053 $ 10,995,997 $ 2,075, % $ 159,240,096 $ 168,509,304 $ 9,269, % UNT Health Science Center $ 99,594,586 $ 113,316,886 $ 13,722, % $ 9,627,770 $ 10,696,894 $ 1,069, % $ 109,222,356 $ 124,013,780 $ 14,791, % Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center* $ 180,220,581 $ 163,330,427 $ (16,890,154) 8.9% $ 11,731,799 $ 10,247,055 $ (1,484,744) 8.6% $ 191,952,380 $ 173,577,482 $ (18,374,898) 8.9% Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso* $ 32,941,830 $ 32,941,830 NA $ 2,496,752 $ 2,496,752 NA $ $ 35,438,582 $ 35,438,582 NA INSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONS SUBTOTAL $ 1,019,464,107 $ 1,059,406,584 $ 39,942, % $ 64,519,285 $ 77,939,228 $ 13,419, % $ 1,083,983,392 $ 1,137,345,812 $ 53,362, % Baylor College of Medicine Undergraduate Medical Education** $ 73,683,904 $ 77,049,050 $ 3,365, % $ $ $ NA $ 73,683,904 $ 77,049,050 $ 3,365, % INSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONS w/ BCOM SUBTOTAL $ 1,093,148,011 $ 1,136,455,634 $ 43,307, % $ 64,519,285 $ 77,939,228 $ 13,419, % $ 1,157,667,296 $ 1,214,394,862 $ 56,727, % Formula Formula Formula % GR Formula Formula Formula % GR D 770 Total Formula Total Formula Total Formula % All Funds Infrastructure*** General Revenue General Revenue GR Variance GR D 770 GR D 770 GR D 770 Variance All Funds All Funds All Funds Variance Difference Biennium Difference Biennium Difference Biennium UT Southwestern Medical Center $ 47,010,305 $ 48,902,883 $ 1,892, % $ 2,485,095 $ 1,656,007 $ (829,088) 33.4% $ 49,495,400 $ 50,558,890 $ 1,063, % UT Medical Branch at Galveston $ 25,626,968 $ 24,171,244 $ (1,455,724) 5.7% $ 2,195,004 $ 2,929,932 $ 734, % $ 27,821,972 $ 27,101,176 $ (720,796) 2.6% UT Health Science Center at Houston $ 36,113,648 $ 37,763,903 $ 1,650, % $ 1,755,794 $ 2,912,509 $ 1,156, % $ 37,869,442 $ 40,676,412 $ 2,806, % UT Health Science Center at San Antonio $ 28,157,571 $ 27,413,709 $ (743,862) 2.6% $ 1,532,855 $ 1,759,927 $ 227, % $ 29,690,426 $ 29,173,636 $ (516,790) 1.7% UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center $ 50,643,296 $ 55,040,378 $ 4,397, % $ 1,185,310 $ 1,153,094 $ (32,216) 2.7% $ 51,828,606 $ 56,193,472 $ 4,364, % UT Health Science Center at Tyler $ 2,037,760 $ 1,733,809 $ (303,951) 14.9% $ $ 462,991 $ 462,991 NA $ 2,037,760 $ 2,196,800 $ 159, % Texas A&M University Health Science Center $ 15,350,336 $ 13,890,844 $ (1,459,492) 9.5% $ 910,896 $ 2,359,012 $ 1,448, % $ 16,261,232 $ 16,249,856 $ (11,376) 0.1% UNT Health Science Center $ 9,316,055 $ 7,769,940 $ (1,546,115) 16.6% $ 900,579 $ 2,294,844 $ 1,394, % $ 10,216,634 $ 10,064,784 $ (151,850) 1.5% Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center* $ 21,723,012 $ 15,256,260 $ (6,466,752) 4.1% $ 1,414,100 $ 2,198,338 $ 784, % $ 23,137,112 $ 17,454,598 $ (5,682,514) 1.9% Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso* $ 5,584,745 $ 5,584,745 NA $ 535,637 $ 535,637 NA $ $ 6,120,382 $ 6,120,382 NA INFRASTRUCTURE SUBTOTAL $ 235,978,951 $ 237,527,715 $ 1,548, % $ 12,379,633 $ 18,262,291 $ 5,882, % $ 248,358,584 $ 255,790,006 $ 7,431, % Prepared by LBB 16

17 Section 3C Formula Formula Formula % GR Formula Formula Formula % GR D 770 Total Formula Total Formula Total Formula % All Funds Research*** General Revenue General Revenue GR Variance GR D 770 GR D 770 GR D 770 Variance All Funds All Funds All Funds Variance Difference Biennium Difference Biennium Difference Biennium UT Southwestern Medical Center $ 12,503,722 $ 13,158,522 $ 654, % $ $ $ NA $ 12,503,722 $ 13,158,522 $ 654, % UT Medical Branch at Galveston $ 6,423,458 $ 6,348,422 $ (75,036) 1.2% $ $ $ NA $ 6,423,458 $ 6,348,422 $ (75,036) 1.2% UT Health Science Center at Houston $ 8,344,236 $ 8,184,424 $ (159,812) 1.9% $ $ $ NA $ 8,344,236 $ 8,184,424 $ (159,812) 1.9% UT Health Science Center at San Antonio $ 6,813,214 $ 6,833,352 $ 20, % $ $ $ NA $ 6,813,214 $ 6,833,352 $ 20, % UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center $ 18,589,454 $ 19,150,090 $ 560, % $ $ $ NA $ 18,589,454 $ 19,150,090 $ 560, % UT Health Science Center at Tyler $ 3,117,926 $ 3,106,380 $ (11,546) 0.4% $ $ $ NA $ 3,117,926 $ 3,106,380 $ (11,546) 0.4% Texas A&M University Health Science Center $ 4,744,578 $ 4,660,822 $ (83,756) 1.8% $ $ $ NA $ 4,744,578 $ 4,660,822 $ (83,756) 1.8% UNT Health Science Center $ 3,846,388 $ 3,813,110 $ (33,278) 0.9% $ $ $ NA $ 3,846,388 $ 3,813,110 $ (33,278) 0.9% Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center* $ 4,300,366 $ 3,780,466 $ (519,900) 65.9% $ $ $ NA $ 4,300,366 $ 3,780,466 $ (519,900) 65.9% Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso* $ 3,354,990 $ 3,354,990 NA $ $ $ NA $ $ 3,354,990 $ 3,354,990 NA RESEARCH SUBTOTAL $ 68,683,342 $ 72,390,578 $ 3,707, % $ $ $ NA $ 68,683,342 $ 72,390,578 $ 3,707, % Formula Formula Formula % GR Formula Formula Formula % GR D 770 Total Formula Total Formula Total Formula % All Funds Three Main Formulas General Revenue General Revenue GR Variance GR D 770 GR D 770 GR D 770 Variance All Funds All Funds All Funds Variance Difference Biennium Difference Biennium Difference Biennium UT Southwestern Medical Center $ 164,328,810 $ 164,549,750 $ 220, % $ 8,025,894 $ 9,375,110 $ 1,349, % $ 172,354,704 $ 173,924,860 $ 1,570, % UT Medical Branch at Galveston $ 150,597,147 $ 156,062,949 $ 5,465, % $ 12,348,781 $ 16,587,147 $ 4,238, % $ 162,945,928 $ 172,650,096 $ 9,704, % UT Health Science Center at Houston $ 242,038,561 $ 240,373,399 $ (1,665,162) 0.7% $ 11,361,887 $ 16,488,513 $ 5,126, % $ 253,400,448 $ 256,861,912 $ 3,461, % UT Health Science Center at San Antonio $ 196,191,137 $ 196,637,258 $ 446, % $ 10,309,443 $ 9,963,430 $ (346,013) 3.4% $ 206,500,580 $ 206,600,688 $ 100,108 % UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center $ 76,171,664 $ 80,832,532 $ 4,660, % $ 1,347,716 $ 1,400,472 $ 52, % $ 77,519,380 $ 82,233,004 $ 4,713, % UT Health Science Center at Tyler $ 5,383,136 $ 5,655,362 $ 272, % $ $ 562,318 $ 562,318 NA $ 5,383,136 $ 6,217,680 $ 834, % Texas A&M University Health Science Center $ 170,414,957 $ 176,064,973 $ 5,650, % $ 9,830,949 $ 13,355,009 $ 3,524, % $ 180,245,906 $ 189,419,982 $ 9,174, % UNT Health Science Center $ 112,757,029 $ 124,899,936 $ 12,142, % $ 10,528,349 $ 12,991,738 $ 2,463, % $ 123,285,378 $ 137,891,674 $ 14,606, % Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center* $ 206,243,959 $ 182,367,153 $ (23,876,806) 8.7% $ 13,145,899 $ 12,445,393 $ (700,506) 17.7% $ 219,389,858 $ 194,812,546 $ (24,577,312) 9.3% Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso* $ $ 41,881,565 $ 41,881,565 NA $ $ 3,032,389 $ 3,032,389 NA $ $ 44,913,954 $ 44,913,954 NA THREE MAIN FORMULAS TOTAL $ 1,324,126,400 $ 1,369,324,877 $ 45,198, % $ 76,898,918 $ 96,201,519 $ 19,302, % $ 1,401,025,318 $ 1,465,526,396 $ 64,501, % Prepared by LBB 17

18 Section 3C Formula Formula Formula % GR Formula Formula Formula % GR D 770 Total Formula Total Formula Total Formula % All Funds Graduate Medical Education General Revenue General Revenue GR Variance GR D 770 GR D 770 GR D 770 Variance All Funds All Funds All Funds Variance Difference Biennium Difference Biennium Difference Biennium UT Southwestern Medical Center $ 15,990,508 $ 16,984,152 $ 993, % $ $ $ NA $ 15,990,508 $ 16,984,152 $ 993, % UT Medical Branch at Galveston $ 5,377,974 $ 5,613,580 $ 235, % $ $ $ NA $ 5,377,974 $ 5,613,580 $ 235, % UT Health Science Center at Houston $ 8,850,608 $ 9,373,039 $ 522, % $ $ $ NA $ 8,850,608 $ 9,373,039 $ 522, % UT Health Science Center at San Antonio $ 7,365,262 $ 7,754,525 $ 389, % $ $ $ NA $ 7,365,262 $ 7,754,525 $ 389, % UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center $ 1,331,688 $ 1,382,907 $ 51, % $ $ $ NA $ 1,331,688 $ 1,382,907 $ 51, % UT Health Science Center at Tyler $ 460,970 $ 850,232 $ 389, % $ $ $ NA $ 460,970 $ 850,232 $ 389, % Texas A&M University Health Science Center $ 5,941,380 $ 6,381,862 $ 440, % $ $ $ NA $ 5,941,380 $ 6,381,862 $ 440, % UNT Health Science Center $ 2,263,870 $ 2,499,477 $ 235, % $ $ $ NA $ 2,263,870 $ 2,499,477 $ 235, % Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center* $ 6,156,500 $ 4,220,429 $ (1,936,071) 7.3% $ $ $ NA $ 6,156,500 $ 4,220,429 $ (1,936,071) 7.3% Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso* $ 2,386,796 $ 2,386,796 NA $ $ $ NA $ $ 2,386,796 $ 2,386,796 NA HEALTH RELATED GME SUBTOTAL $ 53,738,760 $ 57,447,000 $ 3,708, % $ $ $ NA $ 53,738,760 $ 57,447,000 $ 3,708, % Baylor College of Medicine Graduate Medical Education** $ 11,944,223 $ 12,773,967 $ 829, % $ $ $ NA $ 11,944,223 $ 12,773,967 $ 829, % HEALTH RELATED + BCOM GME SUBTOTAL $ 65,682,983 $ 70,220,967 $ 4,537, % $ $ $ NA $ 65,682,983 $ 70,220,967 $ 4,537, % Formula Formula Formula % GR Formula Formula Formula % GR D 770 Total Formula Total Formula Total Formula % All Funds Cancer Center Operations General Revenue General Revenue GR Variance GR D 770 GR D 770 GR D 770 Variance All Funds All Funds All Funds Variance Difference Biennium Difference Biennium Difference Biennium UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center $ 247,535,944 $ 257,089,043 $ 9,553, % $ $ $ NA $ 247,535,944 $ 257,089,043 $ 9,553, % CANCER CENTER OPERATIONS SUBTOTAL $ 247,535,944 $ 257,089,043 $ 9,553, % $ $ $ NA $ 247,535,944 $ 257,089,043 $ 9,553, % Formula Formula Formula % GR Formula Formula Formula % GR D 770 Total Formula Total Formula Total Formula % All Funds Chest Disease Center Operations General Revenue General Revenue GR Variance GR D 770 GR D 770 GR D 770 Variance All Funds All Funds All Funds Variance Difference Biennium Difference Biennium Difference Biennium UT Health Science Center at Tyler $ 54,555,084 $ 56,660,516 $ 2,105, % $ $ $ NA $ 54,555,084 $ 56,660,516 $ 2,105, % CHEST DISEASE CENTER OPERATIONS SUBTOTAL $ 54,555,084 $ 56,660,516 $ 2,105, % $ $ $ NA $ 54,555,084 $ 56,660,516 $ 2,105, % Prepared by LBB 18

19 Section 3C Formula Formula Formula % GR Formula Formula Formula % GR D 770 Total Formula Total Formula Total Formula % All Funds All Formulas General Revenue General Revenue GR Variance GR D 770 GR D 770 GR D 770 Variance All Funds All Funds All Funds Variance Difference Biennium Difference Biennium Difference Biennium UT Southwestern Medical Center $ 180,319,318 $ 181,533,902 $ 1,214, % $ 8,025,894 $ 9,375,110 $ 1,349, % $ 188,345,212 $ 190,909,012 $ 2,563, % UT Medical Branch at Galveston $ 155,975,121 $ 161,676,529 $ 5,701, % $ 12,348,781 $ 16,587,147 $ 4,238, % $ 168,323,902 $ 178,263,676 $ 9,939, % UT Health Science Center at Houston $ 250,889,169 $ 249,746,438 $ (1,142,731) 0.5% $ 11,361,887 $ 16,488,513 $ 5,126, % $ 262,251,056 $ 266,234,951 $ 3,983, % UT Health Science Center at San Antonio $ 203,556,399 $ 204,391,783 $ 835, % $ 10,309,443 $ 9,963,430 $ (346,013) 3.4% $ 213,865,842 $ 214,355,213 $ 489, % UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center $ 325,039,296 $ 339,304,483 $ 14,265, % $ 1,347,716 $ 1,400,472 $ 52, % $ 326,387,012 $ 340,704,954 $ 14,317, % UT Health Science Center at Tyler $ 60,399,190 $ 63,166,110 $ 2,766, % $ $ 562,318 $ 562,318 NA $ 60,399,190 $ 63,728,428 $ 3,329, % Texas A&M University Health Science Center $ 176,356,337 $ 182,446,835 $ 6,090, % $ 9,830,949 $ 13,355,009 $ 3,524, % $ 186,187,286 $ 195,801,844 $ 9,614, % UNT Health Science Center $ 115,020,899 $ 127,399,413 $ 12,378, % $ 10,528,349 $ 12,991,738 $ 2,463, % $ 125,549,248 $ 140,391,151 $ 14,841, % Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center* $ 212,400,459 $ 186,587,582 $ (25,812,877) 8.7% $ 13,145,899 $ 12,445,393 $ (700,506) 17.7% $ 225,546,358 $ 199,032,975 $ (26,513,383) 9.2% Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso* $ $ 44,268,361 $ 44,268,361 NA $ $ 3,032,389 $ 3,032,389 NA $ $ 47,300,750 $ 47,300,750 NA HEALTH RELATED TOTAL $ 1,679,956,188 $ 1,740,521,436 $ 60,565, % $ 76,898,918 $ 96,201,519 $ 19,302, % $ 1,756,855,106 $ 1,836,722,955 $ 79,867, % Baylor College of Medicine** $ 85,628,127 $ 89,823,017 $ 4,194, % $ $ $ NA $ 85,628,127 $ 89,823,017 $ 4,194, % HEALTH RELATED + BCOM TOTAL $ 1,765,584,315 $ 1,830,344,453 $ 64,760, % $ 76,898,918 $ 96,201,519 $ 19,302, % $ 1,842,483,233 $ 1,926,545,972 $ 84,062, % *Appropriations for Texas Tech Health Sciences Center at Lubbock and Texas Tech Health Sciences Center at El Paso were combined under Texas Tech Health Sciences Center at Lubbock during the biennium. Texas Tech Health Sciences Center at El Paso became a standalone institution in May 2013 with the passage of SB120, Eighty third Legislature, Regular Session. The percentage variance for Texas Tech Health Sciences Center and Texas Tech Health Sciences Center at El Paso is calculated on the combined funding change for both institutions from appropriations to Texas Tech Health Sciences Center. **Appropriations for Baylor College of Medicine are provided through the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board bill pattern and are based on the calculation methodology. ***Data elements in the Infrastructure Support formula (predicted square feet) and Research Enhancement Formula (research expenditures) include research conducted by faculty at a clinical partner for all institutions in the biennium formula allocations. Infrastructure Support and Research Enhancement Formula allocations for the biennium only include research conducted by faculty at a clinical partner for Texas A&M University Health Science Center. Prepared by LBB 19

20 Section 3D Total Formula Recommendations Compared to Formula Drivers House Total Formula Total Formula Formula % All Funds Weighted Weighted Weighted % WTFSEs Instruction and Operations All Funds All Funds All Funds Variance FTSEs FTSEs FTSEs Variance Difference Biennium Difference Biennium UT Southwestern Medical Center $ 110,355,582 $ 110,207,448 $ (148,134) 0.1% 5, ,784.0 (8) 0.1% UT Medical Branch at Galveston $ 128,700,498 $ 139,200,498 $ 10,500, % 6, , % UT Health Science Center at Houston $ 207,186,770 $ 208,001,076 $ 814, % 10, , % UT Health Science Center at San Antonio $ 169,996,940 $ 170,593,700 $ 596, % 8, ,785.5 (17) 0.2% UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center $ 7,101,320 $ 6,889,442 $ (211,878) 3.0% (11) 3.0% UT Health Science Center at Tyler $ 227,450 $ 914,500 $ 687, % % Texas A&M University Health Science Center $ 159,240,096 $ 168,509,304 $ 9,269, % 7, , % UNT Health Science Center $ 109,222,356 $ 124,013,780 $ 14,791, % 5, , % Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center* $ 164,318,102 $ 173,577,482 $ 9,259, % 7, , % Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso* $ 27,634,278 $ 35,438,582 $ 7,804, % 1, , % INSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONS SUBTOTAL $ 1,083,983,392 $ 1,137,345,812 $ 53,362, % 54,50 57, , % Baylor College of Medicine Undergraduate Medical Education** $ 73,683,904 $ 77,049,050 $ 3,365, % % INSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONS w/ BCOM SUBTOTAL $ 1,157,667,296 $ 1,214,394,862 $ 56,727, % 55,144 58,284 3, % Total Formula Total Formula Formula % All Funds Predicted Predicted Predicted % Pred. Sq. Ft. Infrastructure All Funds All Funds All Funds Variance Square Feet Square Feet Square Feet Variance Difference Biennium *** Difference Biennium UT Southwestern Medical Center $ 49,495,400 $ 50,558,890 $ 1,063, % 3,733,110 3,813,322 80, % UT Medical Branch at Galveston $ 27,821,972 $ 27,101,176 $ (720,796) 2.6% 2,098,427 2,044,062 (54,365) 2.6% UT Health Science Center at Houston $ 37,869,442 $ 40,676,412 $ 2,806, % 2,856,241 3,067, , % UT Health Science Center at San Antonio $ 29,690,426 $ 29,173,636 $ (516,790) 1.7% 2,239,352 2,200,374 (38,978) 1.7% UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center $ 51,828,606 $ 56,193,472 $ 4,364, % 4,255,482 4,500, , % UT Health Science Center at Tyler $ 2,037,760 $ 2,196,800 $ 159, % 167, ,941 8, % Texas A&M University Health Science Center $ 16,261,232 $ 16,249,856 $ (11,376) 0.1% 1,226,477 1,225,619 (858) 0.1% UNT Health Science Center $ 10,216,634 $ 10,064,784 $ (151,850) 1.5% 770, ,120 (11,453) 1.5% Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center* $ 17,130,406 $ 17,454,598 $ 324, % 1,292,085 1,316,485 24, % Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso* $ 6,006,706 $ 6,120,382 $ 113, % 452, ,620 8, % INFRASTRUCTURE SUBTOTAL $ 248,358,584 $ 255,790,006 $ 7,431, % 19,092,055 19,565, , % Prepared by LBB 20