Second Generation Accountability for ELLs: Connecting Title I and Title III Assessment and Accountability Systems
|
|
- Angelica Patrick
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Second Generation Accountability for ELLs: Connecting Title I and Title III Assessment and Accountability Systems David J. Francis University of Houston Texas Institute for Measurement, Evaluation and Statistics
2 Overview Review background on English Language Learners What factors make ELLs unique as a subgroup under NCLB? Examine the link between language proficiency and content area mastery What are the relative contributions of time in the U.S. and language proficiency to content area achievement? Propose Some Modifications to Current ELL Accountability Do the links between Time, Language Proficiency and Achievement suggest specific improvements to the way that we measure and report on the academic progress of ELLs?
3 Who Are English Language Learners? Over 9M LM students, roughly 5.5M classified as LEP Comprise one of the fastest-growing groups among the schoolaged population in this nation 169% from 1979 to 2003 (vs. 12% growth in general) Expected to be 30% of school-aged population in states have reported 10-year growth in excess of 200% Largest and fastest growing segment of ELL population is Students who immigrated before Kindergarten, and U.S. born children of immigrants
4 Definitions: At school entry Identification Home survey Language proficiency tests Other input (e.g., teachers) Monitoring ELLs (or LEP) Language Prof. Tests IFEP Language Title III Achievement Title I
5 Academic Performance Indicators for ELLs Compared to native English-speaking peers on Grade 4 NAEP, ELLs were 1/4 th as likely to score proficient or above in Reading 1/3 rd as likely in Math ELLs also perform more poorly on State tests For example, in 2002, only 18.7% of designated ELLs scored proficient in reading on state tests (9 states did not report)
6 ELLs as a Subgroup Under NCLB Such comparisons from State and Federal accountability systems may bias results against ELLs Unlike all other demographic groupings (e.g., gender, ethnicity, learning disabilities), membership in the ELL category is dynamic Moreover, the defining characteristic (i.e., language proficiency) is causally linked to the outcomes of interest (i.e., content area achievement) As students become proficient in English, they no longer count as members of the group
7 What is unique about ELLs under NCLB? Unlike other subgroups (e.g., FRL, gender, ethnicity), there is no universal definition of LEP, nor is there a universally accepted approach to identifying children as LEP. Confusion over grammaticality and complexity of thought / capacity for analytical thought Failure to distinguish conversational and academic language Failure to distinguish oral from written language Defining the population of interest and monitoring their academic progress is less precise than it needs to be States differ in the instruments used to assess language proficiency States differ in the criteria used to judge proficiency Too often, subjective judgments are part of the decision process
8 What is unique about ELLs under NCLB? NCLB presumes static group membership. Membership in the LEP subgroup is dynamic, if schools are successful Students are placed in the group when language proficiency is low Students lose their membership as they acquire English, Acquisition of English is a consequence of effective schooling, and mediates the effects of schooling on content mastery Regardless of the specific definition used, membership requires LOW performance on a dimension of skill (viz. Language) that is causally linked to the outcomes of interest
9 Definitions: Changes in Group Membership Over Time RFEP Language Prof. Tests ELLs (or LEP) IFEP
10 RFEP RFEP (excluded in comparisons) ELL ELL (included in comparisons)
11 Comparison of ELLs and former ELLs on State Reading Test in Texas 2002 Level of Language Proficiency for ELL Groups Grade Beginning Intermediate Advanced (2002) Advanced (2000) Overall
12 Comparison of Graduation Rates among ELL, Former ELLs, and Never ELLs in New York City 1 Group After four Years of High School After 7 Years of High School Current ELLs Former ELLs Never ELLs Cohort entering grade 9 in
13 Current Law Allows retention of ELL label for accountability purposes for up to two years after achieving FEP status Makes us happy because it boosts the performance of the ELL group Gives a more accurate view of the performance of ELLs than when FEPs are not counted as ELLs
14 Including FEPs in the ELL Group: Are we really getting at the right information? Grade Overall %Proficient without FEP-2 1 Overall %Proficient with FEP Which column best captures the long term results for ELLs? Which one really tells us how the school/district/state is doing? 1 Hypothetical result based on 2003 percentages in each language proficiency category
15 Retaining FEPs in the ELL group Improves typical practice, but is insufficient to get an accurate and complete picture about the performance of ELL students It does not allow reporting of long term outcomes for students who began school as ELL, and Confounds language proficiency and achievement
16 Including FEPs in the ELL Group: Are we really getting at the right information? Level of Language Proficiency for ELL Groups Grade Beginning Intermediate Advanced (2002) Advanced (2000) Overall %Proficient without FEP-2 1 Overall %Proficient with FEP Which column best captures the long term results for ELLs? Which one really tells us how the school/district/state is doing? 1 Hypothetical result based on 2003 percentages in each language proficiency category
17 Retaining FEPs in the ELL group Improves typical practice, but is insufficient to get an accurate and complete picture about the performance of ELL students It does not allow reporting of long term outcomes for students who began school as ELL, and Confounds language proficiency and achievement
18 What would you conclude if the overall results looked like this from 2002 to 2003? Level of Language Proficiency for ELL Groups Grade Beginning Intermediate Advanced (2002) Advanced (2000) Overall %Proficient Overall %Proficient Hypothetical result based on 2003 percentages in each language proficiency category
19 Aggregate Reporting Masks Performance Changes when Demographics Shift Level of Language Proficiency for ELL Groups Grade Beginning Intermediate Advanced Advanced 2 Years Prior Overall %Proficient The percentage of children in each language proficiency category is partly a function of instruction, but it also a function of demographics. Performance is up for children in each category of language proficiency, but overall performance is down because of changes in the percentage of students in each proficiency category. 1 Hypothetical result based on increasing achievement in all groups while increasing the percentage of students in the lowest three categories of language proficiency
20 Allowing FEP students to count in the ELL category for up to two years Boosts the overall percent proficient within the ELL category, But it does NOT allow us to determine the academic achievement of ELLs who become proficient in English allow us to determine the long term achievement outcomes for children who entered school as ELLs provide schools with actionable information about their ELL students performance, or solve the problem of aggregation bias when demographics are shifting
21 Current accountability practice for ELLs Provides an overly simplistic view of a complex developmental and educational process Fails to take into account the developmental nature of language acquisition Language takes time to acquire This time frame contains both maturational and environmental influences It can be accelerated through good instruction and experiences in a language rich environment, but it cannot be reduced to zero Fails to take into account the causal role that language plays in acquisition of content area knowledge
22 How do time and language work to predict the content area achievement of ELLs?
23 Assessment of Language Proficiency under NCLB (Title III) Must include Listening, Speaking, Reading, and Writing Used for Title III accountability, but Also commonly used for placement, re-designation, decisions about interventions, etc. Must be uniform within state for all students covered by Title III, but is not required for ELL students not receiving Title III services Language proficiency assessments vary greatly across states in content and format
24 High Stakes Assessments and ELLs The effect of language proficiency on ELL performance on content area assessments is a matter of considerable interest to educators, as well as to students and their families. At the same time, this question has not been widely studied in the contexts of today s Title I and Title III assessments Title I assessments - content area assessments Title III assessments - measure English language acquisition Reading, Writing, Speaking, and Listening
25 How are Years in the US, and ELP performance related to performance on the ELA and Math content assessment? ELP Assessment Subtests of Reading (0-30), Writing (0-30), Speaking (0-30), Listening (0-5) Composite Scaled Score ( ) Performance Levels 1 Beginning ( ) Early Intermediate ( ) Late Intermediate ( ) Transitioning ( ) 1 Proficiency cut points vary slightly by grade
26 Sample Sizes for state-level data base Cluster Type N Number with 10 or Fewer Students Maximum N Schools Districts ,590
27 Student Demographics Grade Demographic ALL %Female 47% 48% 47% 46% 48% 55% %Asian a 18% 19% 17% 17% 17% 17% %Black a 11% 10% 11% 10% 11% 12% %Hispanic a 58% 57% 58% 59% 60% 60% %Native American a <1% <1% <1% <1% <1% <1% %Caucasian a 13% 14% 14% 14% 12% 12% %Title I 71% 78% 75% 71% 62% 63% %Free/Reduced Lunch 81% 81% 80% 81% 81% 82% %Special Education 20% 19% 22% 21% 20% 17% %Proficient ELP c 46% 60% 40% 44% 36% 44% Sample Size b 17,767 4,663 3,566 3,303 3,172 3,063
28 14.2% 13.6% 13.0% 15.8% 17.1% 17.1% 10.7% 18.2% 16.5% 22.6% 11.6% 10.5% 11.6% 12.4% 18.9% 12.2% 5.7% 8.8% 7.6% 13.0% 6.9% 5.5% 6.8% 7.4% 12.7% Proficient
29 15.1% 12.6% 7.9% 7.1% 5.5% 19.3% 13.6% 13.7% 10.8% 11.6% 14.6% 15.2% 12.5% 10.0% 13.3% 15.3% 14.4% 13.2% 8.8% 10.6% 10.0% 12.7% 10.8% 9.9% 12.5% Proficient
30 ELA and Math Performance by ELP Category Grade ELP Performance ELA MATH N MEAN SD %Pass %Prof N MEAN SD %Pass %Profs % 0.5% % 1.0% % 0.6% % 2.6% % 1.9% % 5.2% % 20.9% % 22.3% % 0.6% % 0.8% % 0.7% % 3.2% % 2.3% % 7.9% % 25.3% % 25.8% % 0.2% % 1.4% % 0.9% % 2.3% % 2.6% % 5.2% % 25.3% % 19.4% % 0.8% % 1.5% % 0.8% % 3.3% % 2.3% % 4.4% % 33.1% % 19.4% % 0.2% % 0.4% % 0.6% % 3.3% % 4.0% % 3.7% % 35.6% % 18.9% a %Pass is the percentage of students scoring above the state s predefined minimum passing standard of 220 for the ELA and MATH assessments. Proficiency is defined as scoring above 240.
31 Proficient Proficient
32 Proficient Proficient
33 3-Level Model for ELA and Math Unconditional Model (within grade) V(Students(schools)) V(Schools(Districts)) V(Districts) Conditional Models Years in US ELP Years in US and ELP
34 3-Level Model for ELA and Math Conditional Models Model A Years in US ELP measured as Performance Levels Years in US + ELP measured as Performance Levels Model B Years in US + ELP measured as Performance Levels ELP measured as a composite Scaled Score ELP measured as Domain Scores (R, W, S, L) ELP measured as Domain Scores (Reading, Writing)
35 Unconditional Random Effects for ELA and MATH ELA MATH Grade Source Estimate s.e. Z p %Variance a Estimate s.e. Z p %Variance a 4 District < < Schools < < Students < < District < < Schools < < Students < < District < Schools < < Students < < District < < Schools < < Students < < District < Schools < < Students < < a %Variance computed as intra-class correlations (ICCs), viz. as ratio of estimate to sum of estimates for District, School, and Students. Percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding.
36 Conditional Random Effects for ELA and MATH predicted from Years in US, ELP, and Years + ELP Grade Source ELA MATH Years in ELP- Years Years in ELP- Years and US ΔR 2 Perf. ΔR 2 and ELP ΔR 2 US ΔR 2 Perf. ΔR 2 ELP ΔR 2 District Schools Students District Schools Students District Schools Students District Schools Students District Schools Students a ΔR 2 computed as change in variance component from unconditional model (Table 5) relative to magnitude of variance component in unconditional model (Table 5-Table 6)/(Table 5).
37 Conditional Random Effects for ELA and MATH predicted from Years in US + ELP measured as (1) Performance Levels, (2) Scaled Score, or (3) Domain Scores Grade Source ELA MATH Years + Years + Years + Years Years + Years and ELP-PL ΔR 2 ELP-SS ΔR 2 ELP-DS ΔR 2 ELP-PL ΔR 2 ELP-SS ΔR 2 ELP-DS ΔR 2 4 District Schools Students District Schools Students District Schools Students District Schools Students District Schools Students a ΔR 2 computed as change in variance component from unconditional model (Table 5) relative to magnitude of variance component in unconditional model (Table 5-Table 7)/(Table 5).
38 Comparison of Random Effects Using Different Approaches to Measuring ELP Random Effects (Years in US Plus ELP Measured in Different Ways) Grad ELA MATH e Source ELP SS DS RW ELP SS DS RW 4 District Schools Students District Schools Students District Schools Students District Schools Students District Schools Students
39 Analysis Summary Years in the US predicted ELA and MATH performance at the district, school, and student levels However, Years in the US was a relatively weak predictor compared with ELP When ELP was included with Years in US, the effects of Years in the US were unsystematic and small. Effects of ELP remained strong and consistent (i.e., outcomes increased with increases in ELP)
40 Analysis Summary How ELP was measured made some difference in its value as a predictor; Domain Scores predicted best Using Domain Scores for Reading and Writing only was almost as good as using Reading, Writing, Speaking, and Listening These results suggest that the academic components of the language assessment are the most important predictors of content area achievement It is noteworthy that ELP performance accounted for so much of the school and district variability in ELA and MATH
41 Conclusions from Statistical Analyses Taken together, the results highlight the importance of language in the development of content area knowledge. They further highlight that children need to be taught the content in order to close achievement gaps. Gaining proficiency in English was not a guarantee of success on the content area assessments.
42 Suggestions for Improved Accountability for ELLs We clearly have a reporting problem that is fueled by the dynamic nature of the ELL category and the role that language plays in the development of content area proficiency Create a separate reporting category of ELLs who are reclassified as FEP Report achievement results within ELP proficiency levels Beginner, Intermediate, Advanced Intermediate, Fluent English Proficient
43 Suggestions for Improved Accountability for ELLs (cont.) Set achievement performance expectations that are challenging but realistic for each particular group Expect students in the FEP category to perform at levels comparable to monolinguals in the school/district/state Establish more realistic achievement targets for students who are still developing English Goals must be challenging, but attainable, to properly motivate students and teachers Long term expectations for all students are the same, but short term goals must be challenging, yet attainable in the short term
44 Suggestions for Improved Accountability for ELLs (cont.) Hold schools/districts accountable under Title I for language proficiency Hold schools/districts accountable under Title I for the time required for children to achieve FEP status Expect all students to reach FEP status Short-circuit gamesmanship by limiting the time before children must be counted in the FEP category for accountability
45 How do these steps improve accountability? Gives schools actionable information about the content area achievement of ELLs Allows more accurate evaluation of school performance in the face of shifting demographics Credits language proficiency gains and content area achievement gains that are reasonable given students language proficiency Meaningfully counts the achievement results for all children regardless of their level of language proficiency Recognizes the importance of setting challenging but attainable goals to motivate maximal performance
46 Conclusions An accountability model that addresses these issues will provide more accurate information to teachers, principals, and other stakeholders about the performance of ELLs Place emphasis on integration of language instruction into content area instruction, and Increase the emphasis on teaching content when ELLs first reach school Increase the demand for language tests that will serve as better barometers of ELL students acquisition of the academic language skills needed to master content domains.
47 Thank You
Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance
Kansas State Department of Education Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance Based on Elementary & Secondary Education Act, No Child Left Behind (P.L. 107-110) Revised May 2010 Revised May
More informationA Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education
A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education Note: Additional information regarding AYP Results from 2003 through 2007 including a listing of each individual
More informationShelters Elementary School
Shelters Elementary School August 2, 24 Dear Parents and Community Members: We are pleased to present you with the (AER) which provides key information on the 23-24 educational progress for the Shelters
More informationMiami-Dade County Public Schools
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS AND THEIR ACADEMIC PROGRESS: 2010-2011 Author: Aleksandr Shneyderman, Ed.D. January 2012 Research Services Office of Assessment, Research, and Data Analysis 1450 NE Second Avenue,
More informationStudent Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools
Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools Introduction The Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (ESE) calculates and reports mobility rates as part of its overall
More informationCooper Upper Elementary School
LIVONIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS www.livoniapublicschools.org/cooper 213-214 BOARD OF EDUCATION 213-14 Mark Johnson, President Colleen Burton, Vice President Dianne Laura, Secretary Tammy Bonifield, Trustee Dan
More informationCooper Upper Elementary School
LIVONIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS http://cooper.livoniapublicschools.org 215-216 Annual Education Report BOARD OF EDUCATION 215-16 Colleen Burton, President Dianne Laura, Vice President Tammy Bonifield, Secretary
More informationNATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT GOVERNING BOARD AD HOC COMMITTEE ON.
NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT GOVERNING BOARD AD HOC COMMITTEE ON NAEP TESTING AND REPORTING OF STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES (SD) AND ENGLISH
More informationEvaluation of Teach For America:
EA15-536-2 Evaluation of Teach For America: 2014-2015 Department of Evaluation and Assessment Mike Miles Superintendent of Schools This page is intentionally left blank. ii Evaluation of Teach For America:
More informationILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD
-6-525-2- Hazel Crest SD 52-5 Hazel Crest SD 52-5 Hazel Crest, ILLINOIS 2 8 ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each year.
More informationILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD
-6-525-2- HAZEL CREST SD 52-5 HAZEL CREST SD 52-5 HAZEL CREST, ILLINOIS and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each year. 2 7 ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD
More informationBellehaven Elementary
Overall istrict: Albuquerque Public Schools Grade Range: KN-05 Code: 1229 School Grade Report Card 2013 Current Standing How did students perform in the most recent school year? are tested on how well
More informationNCEO Technical Report 27
Home About Publications Special Topics Presentations State Policies Accommodations Bibliography Teleconferences Tools Related Sites Interpreting Trends in the Performance of Special Education Students
More informationData Diskette & CD ROM
Data File Format Data Diskette & CD ROM Texas Assessment of Academic Skills Fall 2002 through Summer 2003 Exit Level Test Administrations Attention Macintosh Users To accommodate Macintosh systems a delimiter
More informationPsychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability
August 2012 Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability Linking Measures of Academic Progress in Mathematics and Maryland School Assessment in Mathematics Huafang Zhao, Ph.D. This brief
More informationIowa School District Profiles. Le Mars
Iowa School District Profiles Overview This profile describes enrollment trends, student performance, income levels, population, and other characteristics of the public school district. The report utilizes
More informationSection V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient
Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient Understanding Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient Decision Guide: Reclassifying a Student from
More informationREADY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE
READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE Michal Kurlaender University of California, Davis Policy Analysis for California Education March 16, 2012 This research
More informationDATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P
TITLE III REQUIREMENTS STATE POLICY DEFINITIONS DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITY IDENTIFICATION OF LEP STUDENTS A district that receives funds under Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act shall comply with the
More informationPort Graham El/High. Report Card for
School: District: Kenai Peninsula Grades: K - 12 School Enrollment: 20 Title I School? No Title 1 Program: Accreditation: Report Card for 2008-2009 A Title 1 school receives federal money in support low-achieving
More informationComing in. Coming in. Coming in
212-213 Report Card for Glenville High School SCHOOL DISTRICT District results under review by the Ohio Department of Education based upon 211 findings by the Auditor of State. Achievement This grade combines
More informationThe Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement
The Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement Eva L. Baker, EdD - University of California, Los Angeles, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing
More informationState Parental Involvement Plan
A Toolkit for Title I Parental Involvement Section 3 Tools Page 41 Tool 3.1: State Parental Involvement Plan Description This tool serves as an example of one SEA s plan for supporting LEAs and schools
More informationEffectiveness of McGraw-Hill s Treasures Reading Program in Grades 3 5. October 21, Research Conducted by Empirical Education Inc.
Effectiveness of McGraw-Hill s Treasures Reading Program in Grades 3 5 October 21, 2010 Research Conducted by Empirical Education Inc. Executive Summary Background. Cognitive demands on student knowledge
More informationGraduate Division Annual Report Key Findings
Graduate Division 2010 2011 Annual Report Key Findings Trends in Admissions and Enrollment 1 Size, selectivity, yield UCLA s graduate programs are increasingly attractive and selective. Between Fall 2001
More informationReview of Student Assessment Data
Reading First in Massachusetts Review of Student Assessment Data Presented Online April 13, 2009 Jennifer R. Gordon, M.P.P. Research Manager Questions Addressed Today Have student assessment results in
More informationEDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT By 2030, at least 60 percent of Texans ages 25 to 34 will have a postsecondary credential or degree. Target: Increase the percent of Texans ages 25 to 34 with a postsecondary credential.
More informationStatistical Peers for Benchmarking 2010 Supplement Grade 11 Including Charter Schools NMSBA Performance 2010
Statistical Peers for Benchmarking 2010 Supplement Grade 11 Including Charter Schools NMSBA Performance 2010 September 2010 River Dunavin 1 ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION PAULA MAES Vice
More informationEssentials of Ability Testing. Joni Lakin Assistant Professor Educational Foundations, Leadership, and Technology
Essentials of Ability Testing Joni Lakin Assistant Professor Educational Foundations, Leadership, and Technology Basic Topics Why do we administer ability tests? What do ability tests measure? How are
More information2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS
3 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS Achievement and Accountability Office December 3 NAEP: The Gold Standard The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) is administered in reading
More informationExams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners
PSSA Accommodations Guidelines for English Language Learners (ELLs) [Arlen: Please format this page like the cover page for the PSSA Accommodations Guidelines for Students PSSA with IEPs and Students with
More informationAn Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District
An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District Report Submitted June 20, 2012, to Willis D. Hawley, Ph.D., Special
More informationCollege and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent Making Education Work for All of Georgia s Students College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12 CONTENT MASTERY (END of COURSE TESTS
More informationWisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Main takeaways from the 2015 NAEP 4 th grade reading exam: Wisconsin scores have been statistically flat
More informationInstructional Intervention/Progress Monitoring (IIPM) Model Pre/Referral Process. and. Special Education Comprehensive Evaluation.
Instructional Intervention/Progress Monitoring (IIPM) Model Pre/Referral Process and Special Education Comprehensive Evaluation for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CLD) Students Guidelines and Resources
More informationAnalyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs
Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs 2016 Dual Language Conference: Making Connections Between Policy and Practice March 19, 2016 Framingham, MA Session Description
More informationCuero Independent School District
Cuero Independent School District Texas Superintendent: Henry Lind Primary contact: Debra Baros, assistant superintendent* 1,985 students, prek-12, rural District Description Cuero Independent School District
More informationBENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT: CARNEGIE PEER INSTITUTIONS, 2003-2011 PREPARED BY: ANGEL A. SANCHEZ, DIRECTOR KELLI PAYNE, ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST/ SPECIALIST
More informationMaximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge
Innov High Educ (2009) 34:93 103 DOI 10.1007/s10755-009-9095-2 Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge Phyllis Blumberg Published online: 3 February
More informationLongitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers
F I N A L R E P O R T Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers July 8, 2014 Elias Walsh Dallas Dotter Submitted to: DC Education Consortium for Research and Evaluation School of Education
More informationSchool Competition and Efficiency with Publicly Funded Catholic Schools David Card, Martin D. Dooley, and A. Abigail Payne
School Competition and Efficiency with Publicly Funded Catholic Schools David Card, Martin D. Dooley, and A. Abigail Payne Web Appendix See paper for references to Appendix Appendix 1: Multiple Schools
More informationMultiple regression as a practical tool for teacher preparation program evaluation
Multiple regression as a practical tool for teacher preparation program evaluation ABSTRACT Cynthia Williams Texas Christian University In response to No Child Left Behind mandates, budget cuts and various
More informationPeer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice
Megan Andrew Cheng Wang Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice Background Many states and municipalities now allow parents to choose their children
More informationWest Haven School District English Language Learners Program
West Haven School District English Language Learners Program 2016 W E S T H A V E N S C H O O L S Hello CIAO NÍN HǍO MERHABA ALLÔ CHÀO DZIEN DOBRY SALAAM Hola Dear Staff, Our combined community of bilingual
More informationSession 2B From understanding perspectives to informing public policy the potential and challenges for Q findings to inform survey design
Session 2B From understanding perspectives to informing public policy the potential and challenges for Q findings to inform survey design Paper #3 Five Q-to-survey approaches: did they work? Job van Exel
More informationProficiency Illusion
KINGSBURY RESEARCH CENTER Proficiency Illusion Deborah Adkins, MS 1 Partnering to Help All Kids Learn NWEA.org 503.624.1951 121 NW Everett St., Portland, OR 97209 Executive Summary At the heart of the
More informationStatus of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine
Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine The figures and tables below are based upon the latest publicly available data from AAMC, NSF, Department of Education and the US Census Bureau.
More informationHokulani Elementary School
Hokulani Elementary Code: 109 Status and Improvement Report Year -11 Contents Focus On Standards Grades K-5 This Status and Improvement Report has been prepared as part of the Department's education accountability
More informationStudent Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation
Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist and Bethany L. McCaffrey, Ph.D., Interim Director of Research and Evaluation Evaluation
More informationFurther, Robert W. Lissitz, University of Maryland Huynh Huynh, University of South Carolina ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS
A peer-reviewed electronic journal. Copyright is retained by the first or sole author, who grants right of first publication to Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation. Permission is granted to distribute
More informationPresident Abraham Lincoln Elementary School
Code: 134 President Abraham Lincoln Elementary Status and Improvement Report Year -04 Focus On Standards Grades K-5 Focus on Standards Description Contents p. 1 p. 1 This Status and Improvement Report
More informationRAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI
RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI Agenda Introductions Definitions History of the work Strategies Next steps Debrief
More informationIllinois State Board of Education Student Information System. Annual Fall State Bilingual Program Directors Meeting
Illinois State Board of Education Student Information System Annual Fall State Bilingual Program Directors Meeting 1 September 2013 Agenda ISBE SIS Project Team Capture of Culturally and Linguistically
More informationFTE General Instructions
Florida Department of Education Bureau of PK-20 Education Data Warehouse and Office of Funding and Financial Reporting FTE General Instructions 2017-18 Questions and comments regarding this publication
More informationThe Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016
The Condition of College and Career Readiness This report looks at the progress of the 16 ACT -tested graduating class relative to college and career readiness. This year s report shows that 64% of students
More informationInstitution of Higher Education Demographic Survey
Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey Data from all participating institutions are aggregated for the comparative studies by various types of institutional characteristics. For that purpose,
More informationWorld s Best Workforce Plan
2017-18 World s Best Workforce Plan District or Charter Name: PiM Arts High School, 4110-07 Contact Person Name and Position Matt McFarlane, Executive Director In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section
More informationOrleans Central Supervisory Union
Orleans Central Supervisory Union Vermont Superintendent: Ron Paquette Primary contact: Ron Paquette* 1,142 students, prek-12, rural District Description Orleans Central Supervisory Union (OCSU) is the
More informationUnraveling symbolic number processing and the implications for its association with mathematics. Delphine Sasanguie
Unraveling symbolic number processing and the implications for its association with mathematics Delphine Sasanguie 1. Introduction Mapping hypothesis Innate approximate representation of number (ANS) Symbols
More informationEFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS
EFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS Jennifer Head, Ed.S Math and Least Restrictive Environment Instructional Coach Department
More informationMaking the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview
Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview 2017-2018 Texas Education Agency Student Assessment Division. Disclaimer These slides have been prepared by the Student Assessment Division of the
More informationKahului Elementary School
Kahului Elementary Code: 405 Status and Improvement Report Year 2014-15 Focus On Standards Grades K-5 Focus on Standards Description Contents Setting Student Profile Community Profile Improvement Summary
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices. April 2017
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices April 2017 Prepared for the Nellie Mae Education Foundation by the UMass Donahue Institute 1
More informationSamuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School
Code: 420 Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate Status and Improvement Report Year 2014-15 Focus On Standards Grades 6-8 Contents This Status and Improvement Report has been prepared as part of the Department's
More informationFinancing Education In Minnesota
Financing Education In Minnesota 2016-2017 Created with Tagul.com A Publication of the Minnesota House of Representatives Fiscal Analysis Department August 2016 Financing Education in Minnesota 2016-17
More informationTransportation Equity Analysis
2015-16 Transportation Equity Analysis Each year the Seattle Public Schools updates the Transportation Service Standards and bus walk zone boundaries for use in the upcoming school year. For the 2014-15
More information5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity
5 Programmatic Equity It is one thing to take as a given that approximately 70 percent of an entering high school freshman class will not attend college, but to assign a particular child to a curriculum
More informationAfrican American Male Achievement Update
Report from the Department of Research, Evaluation, and Assessment Number 8 January 16, 2009 African American Male Achievement Update AUTHOR: Hope E. White, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist Department
More informationRaw Data Files Instructions
Raw Data Files Instructions Colleges will report the above information for students in the Main Cohort for each of the reporting timeframes and the system will calculate the sub cohorts and metrics based
More informationTrends & Issues Report
Trends & Issues Report prepared by David Piercy & Marilyn Clotz Key Enrollment & Demographic Trends Options Identified by the Eight Focus Groups General Themes 4J Eugene School District 4J Eugene, Oregon
More informationSchool Performance Plan Middle Schools
SY 2012-2013 School Performance Plan Middle Schools 734 Middle ALternative Program @ Lombard, Principal Roger Shaw (Interim), Executive Director, Network Facilitator PLEASE REFER TO THE SCHOOL PERFORMANCE
More informationDo multi-year scholarships increase retention? Results
Do multi-year scholarships increase retention? In the past, Boise State has mainly offered one-year scholarships to new freshmen. Recently, however, the institution moved toward offering more two and four-year
More informationState of New Jersey
OVERVIEW 1213 GRADE SPAN KG6 116946 GALLOWAY, NEW JERSEY 85 This school's academic performance is about average when compared to schools across the state. Additionally, its academic performance is very
More informationThe Efficacy of PCI s Reading Program - Level One: A Report of a Randomized Experiment in Brevard Public Schools and Miami-Dade County Public Schools
The Efficacy of PCI s Reading Program - Level One: A Report of a Randomized Experiment in Brevard Public Schools and Miami-Dade County Public Schools Megan Toby Boya Ma Andrew Jaciw Jessica Cabalo Empirical
More informationA Decision Tree Analysis of the Transfer Student Emma Gunu, MS Research Analyst Robert M Roe, PhD Executive Director of Institutional Research and
A Decision Tree Analysis of the Transfer Student Emma Gunu, MS Research Analyst Robert M Roe, PhD Executive Director of Institutional Research and Planning Overview Motivation for Analyses Analyses and
More informationThe Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3
The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3 The State Board adopted the Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework (December 2009) as guidance for the State, districts, and schools
More informationCharter School Performance Comparable to Other Public Schools; Stronger Accountability Needed
April 2005 Report No. 05-21 Charter School Performance Comparable to Other Public Schools; Stronger Accountability Needed at a glance On average, charter school students are academically behind when they
More informationECON 365 fall papers GEOS 330Z fall papers HUMN 300Z fall papers PHIL 370 fall papers
Assessing Critical Thinking in GE In Spring 2016 semester, the GE Curriculum Advisory Board (CAB) engaged in assessment of Critical Thinking (CT) across the General Education program. The assessment was
More informationGuidebook on Designing, Delivering and Evaluating Services for English Learners (ELs)
Guidebook on Designing, Delivering and Evaluating Services for English Learners (ELs) Revised October 2016 Colorado State Board of Education Valentina Flores (D) 1st Congressional District Denver Angelika
More informationAlpha provides an overall measure of the internal reliability of the test. The Coefficient Alphas for the STEP are:
Every individual is unique. From the way we look to how we behave, speak, and act, we all do it differently. We also have our own unique methods of learning. Once those methods are identified, it can make
More informationLinking the Common European Framework of Reference and the Michigan English Language Assessment Battery Technical Report
Linking the Common European Framework of Reference and the Michigan English Language Assessment Battery Technical Report Contact Information All correspondence and mailings should be addressed to: CaMLA
More informationUniversity-Based Induction in Low-Performing Schools: Outcomes for North Carolina New Teacher Support Program Participants in
University-Based Induction in Low-Performing Schools: Outcomes for North Carolina New Teacher Support Program Participants in 2014-15 In this policy brief we assess levels of program participation and
More informationSTUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION
300-37 Administrative Procedure 360 STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION Background Maintaining a comprehensive system of student assessment and evaluation is an integral component of the teaching-learning
More informationNorms How were TerraNova 3 norms derived? Does the norm sample reflect my diverse school population?
Frequently Asked Questions Today s education environment demands proven tools that promote quality decision making and boost your ability to positively impact student achievement. TerraNova, Third Edition
More informationKaty Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan
Katy Independent School District 2017-2018 Campus Improvement Plan Generated by Plan4Learningcom 1 of 15 Table of Contents Comprehensive Needs Assessment 3 Demographics 3 Student Academic Achievement 4
More informationMandarin Lexical Tone Recognition: The Gating Paradigm
Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 0 (008), p. 8 Abstract Mandarin Lexical Tone Recognition: The Gating Paradigm Yuwen Lai and Jie Zhang University of Kansas Research on spoken word recognition
More informationSegmentation Study of Tulsa Area Higher Education Needs Ages 36+ March Prepared for: Conducted by:
Segmentation Study of Tulsa Area Higher Education Needs Ages 36+ March 2004 * * * Prepared for: Tulsa Community College Tulsa, OK * * * Conducted by: Render, vanderslice & Associates Tulsa, Oklahoma Project
More informationEffective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students
Critical Issues in Dental Education Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students Naty Lopez, Ph.D.; Rose Wadenya, D.M.D., M.S.;
More informationWeek 4: Action Planning and Personal Growth
Week 4: Action Planning and Personal Growth Overview So far in the Comprehensive Needs Assessment of your selected campus, you have analyzed demographic and student learning data through the AYP report,
More informationMassachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Title I Comparability 2009-2010 Title I provides federal financial assistance to school districts to provide supplemental educational services
More informationschool students to improve communication skills
Motivating middle and high school students to improve communication skills Megan Mahowald, Ph.D. CCC-SLP Indiana University mcmahowa@indiana.edu Case Study High Motivation Low Motivation Behaviors what
More informationStatus of Latino Education in Massachusetts: A Report
University of Massachusetts Boston ScholarWorks at UMass Boston Gastón Institute Publications Gastón Institute for Latino Community Development and Public Policy Publications 3-1-2008 Status of Latino
More informationENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL) UPDATE FOR SUNSHINE STATE TESOL 2013
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL) UPDATE FOR SUNSHINE STATE TESOL 2013 Presented by: Chane Eplin, Bureau Chief Student Achievement through Language Acquisition Florida Department of Education May 16, 2013
More informationIllinois State Board of Education Student Information System. Annual Fall State Bilingual Program Directors Meeting
Illinois State Board of Education Student Information System Annual Fall State Bilingual Program Directors Meeting 1 October 2010 Agenda ISBE SIS Project Team ELL Screener English Language Learners (ELL)
More informationJohn F. Kennedy Middle School
John F. Kennedy Middle School CUPERTINO UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT Steven Hamm, Principal hamm_steven@cusdk8.org School Address: 821 Bubb Rd. Cupertino, CA 95014-4938 (408) 253-1525 CDS Code: 43-69419-6046890
More informationNewburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan
Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic Academic Intervention Services Plan Revised September 2016 October 2015 Newburgh Enlarged City School District Elementary Academic Intervention Services
More informationTHE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS ELIZABETH ANNE SOMERS Spring 2011 A thesis submitted in partial
More informationCONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS
CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS No. 18 (replaces IB 2008-21) April 2012 In 2008, the State Education Department (SED) issued a guidance document to the field regarding the
More informationThe Talent Development High School Model Context, Components, and Initial Impacts on Ninth-Grade Students Engagement and Performance
The Talent Development High School Model Context, Components, and Initial Impacts on Ninth-Grade Students Engagement and Performance James J. Kemple, Corinne M. Herlihy Executive Summary June 2004 In many
More informationSchool Size and the Quality of Teaching and Learning
School Size and the Quality of Teaching and Learning An Analysis of Relationships between School Size and Assessments of Factors Related to the Quality of Teaching and Learning in Primary Schools Undertaken
More information