Chapter 5: Academic Program Quality Review
|
|
- Kenneth Cook
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Chapter 5: Academic Program Quality Review Contents Structures & Responsibilities 5.1 Programme Quality Review Framework 5.2 Programme Learning Outcome Assessment 5.5 Annual Academic Programme Audit 5.13 Cyclical Programme Review 5.17 Policy and Procedures 5.21 Structures & Responsibilities Office of the Deputy Vice Chancellor Academic Affairs Program and Curricula, Academic Affairs The is responsible for supporting Academic Faculties in the continuous quality improvement of the HCT s educational provision, the development of the academic quality program review provision, and the assurance of its implementation. The is headed by the Assistant Deputy Vice-Chancellor Program and Curricula and contains a specialist section for Program Review and Improvement. Academic Faculties Faculty Academic s (FAC) The FAC is responsible for implementing the policy and procedure related to program review. Industry Advisory (IAC) Industry Advisory s (IAC's) provide input from local industry professionals and other external stakeholder into the programme and its courses from the perspective of industry professionals and external community stakeholders. Academic Council The Academic Council receives and evaluates recommendations from the Curriculum Quality Assurance and endorses them for approval by the Executive or Board of Trustees. System-wide Curriculum Quality Assurance (CQA) The oversees and supports the implementation of the program quality review provision, and reports annually to Academic Council on the effectiveness of program quality review processes and activities. The approves the Cyclical Program Review calendar. Board of Trustees The Board approves the teaching-out of an academic program across the HCT. Institutional Research Unit, Organizational Excellence (IR) IR provides input in terms of institutional research data and analysis, and monitors the effectiveness of the academic program quality review provision. IR also publishes an annual Institutional Effectiveness (IE) Report which contains Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for Academic Faculties and campuses. The Report provides trend analysis of institutional effectiveness indicators over the last three years, responses from Academic Faculties and campuses on the past trends, targets and action plans for improvement. 5.1
2 Programme Quality Review Framework Purpose The HCT s academic Programme Review Policy is designed to ensure that programmes are: Aligned to the Mission of the HCT Regularly enhanced to meet the changing needs of the nation and its economy Continuously improved for effective learning Upgraded to align with new and emerging technologies Effectively resourced in terms of instructors, teaching and learning resources, computer and information technology, physical facilities, and budgeting Requirement Academic Programs Process Frequency Focus Timeline HCT 2.0 Bachelor s, Higher Diploma, Diploma Program Learning Outcome Assessment Each PLO at least once every 3 years Minimum 30% of PLOs per year Teaching & Learning August HCT 2.0 Bachelor s, Higher Diploma, Diploma Annual Program Audit Yearly review of key indicators Program Health Check October Bachelor: every 5 years HCT 2.0 Bachelor s, Higher Diploma, Diploma Cyclical Program Review Higher Diploma: every 4 years Program Continuance December Diploma: every 3 years HCT 2.0 Bachelor s, Higher Diploma, Diploma External Accreditation of Academic Programs Periodically (depending on external accreditation schedule) International Standards - 5.2
3 Overview of the HCT Programme Review Process Year 1 =>30% PLOs Assessed Annual Programme Audit Report Year 2 =>60% PLOs Assessed Annual Programme Audit Report Year 3 100% PLOs Assessed Annual Programme Audit Report Year 4 =>30% PLOs Assessed Annual Programme Report Year 5 =>60% PLOs Assessed Annual Programme Report Cyclical Review Focus Student Learning Programme Modification Programme Continuance Responsibilities: Programme Quality Review Framework Program Review Component Program and Curricula Curriculum Quality Assurance Academic Council Program Quality Review Framework Implements the framework Reports on the implementation of the Programme Quality Review Framework to the CQA Recommends measures for improvement of the Programme Quality Reports on the effectiveness of the Programme Quality Review Framework including Program Learning Outcome Assessment, Annual Program Audits, and Cyclical Program Review Recommends measures for improvement of the Reviews and monitors the effectiveness of Programme Quality Review Framework Receives feedback from Academic Faculties regarding the effectiveness of the Programme Quality Review Framework Receives reports on the implementation and effectiveness of the Programme Quality Review Framework from CQA Approves measures for improvement of the Programme Quality Review Framework 5.3
4 Program Review Component Program and Curricula Curriculum Quality Assurance Academic Council Review Framework to the CQA. Programme Quality Review Framework to the CQA. Recommends measures for improvement of the Programme Quality Review Framework to the Academic Council Timeline What When Purpose Programme Learning Outcome Assessment At least once every 3 years Continuous quality improvement Program Audit Report Annually Continuous quality improvement - evaluate program s effectiveness in meeting its mission, and the needs of students and society Cyclical Program Review Every 5 years Continuance at the HCT or at a particular campus External Review of Academic Programs Periodically (depending on external accreditation schedule) National and international accreditation Program Review Site Resources and Reports related to program learning outcome assessment, annual program audit and cyclical program review are published on-line. For further details visit the: Program Review Site 5.4
5 Programme Learning Outcome Assessment Purpose The purpose of PLO Assessment is to monitor the effectiveness of the curriculum and to guide quality improvements to programs. There are two types of PLO assessment: Summative PLO Assessment The main purpose of institutional PLO Assessment is to gather evidence of the cumulative effect of the program curriculum on student learning. Assessments selected from courses close to graduation Courses identified in the Curriculum Map as where students would be able to demonstrate their mastery of the target PLO. Formative PLO Assessment The focus is to provide faculty and students with valuable feedback on progress towards achieving PLOs. The administers throughout the program length employing course assessments aligned to the specific PLO. PLO Cycle Evidence of Student Achievement There are two types of evidence collected: Direct evidence of student achievement of programme learning outcome using embedded course assessments. Academic Faculties may also employ alternatives to embedded assessment such as specially designed assessment tasks, external examinations etc. Indirect evidence of student achievement of programme learning outcomes is collected by means of surveys. The survey results and their analysis form part of the Annual Program Audit Report (see below). Surveys used include the Student Exit Survey, Graduate Employment Survey, Graduate Employer Survey. Requirement For each academic program: Each programme learning outcome is to be assessed at least once over a three year period. A minimum of 30% of programme learning outcomes must be assessed each academic year. Each identifies assessments to provide evidence of student achievement of each Programme Learning Outcome (PLO). Faculties then interpret the results and provide an action plan to address any shortcomings. Typically, the assessments used to provide evidence are assessments from towards graduation e.g. courses in year 3 or year 4 of the programme. The designated assessments should be common assessments i.e. the assessment instrument (oral defence, portfolio, project, report, test etc.), marking scheme or rubric, grading and standards of achievement should be the same for all students taking the assessment across the system. Academic Faculties must ensure that the following are kept for example in the relevant electronic Course File (ecaf): Copies of the assessment instrument Marking scheme/rubric Details of moderation process Samples of student work reflecting the range of performance - wherever possible Quantitative analysis of results 5.5
6 Process Long Term (3-Year) PLO Assessment Plan Modifications to Plan Annual PLO Assessment Plan Evaluate impact of action plan Assess students PLO Assessment Process Implement Actions for improving student learning Report Results Action Plan for improving student learning Program & Curricula Review Report & Action Plan 5.6
7 Long Term (3-Year) Assessment Plan Continuous Quality Improvement Cycle ASSESS EVALUATE Action Plans for CQI CHANGE Implement Action Plans ASSESS Evaluate Change Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Sample PLO Schedule (ABET Inc.) Curriculum Maps Course learning outcomes are mapped to programme learning outcomes to show how each course contributes to student achievement of the outcomes. The mappings monitor that each programme learning outcome is adequately covered through the curriculum and that all courses are aligned to the outcomes. Mapping reports are available from the. Sample curriculum map 5.7
8 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7 Course PLO1 PLO2 PLO3 HSW 1003 Introduced HSW 1023 Introduced Introduced HSW 1033 Introduced Introduced HSW 1223 Introduced Reinforced HSW 1233 Introduced Reinforced HSW 1313 Introduced Reinforced Reinforced HSW 2013 Introduced Reinforced Reinforced HSW 2033 Introduced Reinforced HSW 2133 Reinforced Reinforced HSC 2203 Reinforced HSW 2143 Reinforced Reinforced HSW 2323 Reinforced Reinforced Reinforced HSW 2333 Reinforced Reinforced Reinforced HSW 3013 Reinforced Reinforced Reinforced HSW 3103 Reinforced Reinforced Reinforced HSW 3023 Reinforced Reinforced HSW 3033 Reinforced Reinforced HSW 3223 Reinforced Reinforced Reinforced HSW 3943-WP Reinforced Reinforced Reinforced HSC 4003 Reinforced HSW 4223 Reinforced Reinforced Assessed/Mastered HSW 4233 Assessed/Mastered Assessed/Mastered Assessed/Mastered HSW 4033 Reinforced HSW 4243 Reinforced HSW 4928 Assessed/Mastered Assessed/Mastered Assessed/Mastered HSC 4006 Assessed/Mastered HSW 4303 Assessed/Mastered Assessed/Mastered Assessed/Mastered (Bachelor of Social Work) Method Each develops a long term plan for each program to ensure that evidence is collected of student achievement for each programme learning outcome at least once every 3-years by a: Direct assessment in a required course such as a final assessment, capstone project, external assessment etc. Common assessment instrument (oral defense, portfolio, project, report, test etc.), marking scheme/rubric, grading system, moderation process, and standards of achievement. Academic Faculties select the most valid assessments to be used as evidence of student achievement of programme learning outcomes from year 3 or year 4 BAS courses, and from year 2 Diploma courses. Best practice indicates that Faculties should identify a number of different assessment tasks to provide for a wider sampling of student learning allowing students to demonstrate a wider range of knowledge, skills and competencies than can be observed from reliance on a single form of assessment such as a written examination. 5.8
9 The designated assessment must provide sufficient depth and scope to produce valid evidence of student achievement of the targeted programme learning outcome. In cases where no single assessment is sufficient, a number of assessment may be designated. Each designated assessment becomes a common assessment i.e. the assessment instrument (oral defence, portfolio, project, report, test etc.), marking scheme or rubric, grading and standards of achievement are the same for all students taking the assessment across the system. Illustration: 3-Year PLO Assessment Plan PLO Programme Learning Outcome An ability to apply knowledge of computing and mathematics appropriate to the discipline CIS 3003: FWA 2 An ability to analyze a problem, and identify and define the computing requirements appropriate to its solution 3 An ability to analyse a problem, and identify and define the computing requirements appropriate to its solution. CIS 4906: Capstone project CIS 4906: Capstone project 4 An ability to function effectively on teams to accomplish a common goal CIS 4103: CSA 5 An understanding of professional, ethical, legal, security and social issues and responsibilities CIS 3103: CSA etc Annual Programme Learning Outcome Assessment In each academic year, it is expected that for each program, evidence of student achievement will be collected for a minimum of 30% of each of programme s learning outcomes. Process Step Process When By Action Plan Develop assessment plans for each PLO Designate assessments for each PLO Start of academic year Faculty Academic Submit to Executive Dean to review and recommend for approval by Program & Curricula Do Implement assessment plan consistently across classes and delivery sites Throughout academic year (Course Team) Administer assessments Collect data from direct assessment Throughout academic year (Course Team) Mark and record results 5.9
10 Check Analyze data Identify shortcomings and/or anomalies Each Fall and Spring semester Input to Annual Program Audit and Program & Curricula Develop action plans to address shortcomings and/or anomalies End of each semester (Course Team) Minor modifications: submit to Executive Dean for approval Major modifications: submit to Executive Dean to review and recommend for approval by Academic Council Input into Annual Program Audit Act Implement action plans e.g. modify curriculum, assessment, resource allocation (instructors, learning resources, physical resources, budget) Following semester (Course Team) Update: curriculum management system, programme and course documentation Monitor effectiveness of actions. Report effectiveness of QA process Throughout academic year and Program & Curricula Input to Annual Program Audit Annual Programme Learning Outcome Assessment Plan and Report The Plan describes how the Long Term Plan will be implemented in the academic year and the standard to be used for evaluating student achievement. When completed, the Report provides the results of the assessment used as evidence, the analysis of the results, and plans to deal with any shortfalls in meeting expectations (e.g. issues related to the assessment task used etc.) and to improve student learning (e.g. modifications to teaching & learning strategies, materials etc.). Annual Program Learning Outcome Assessment Report The template provides: 1) the assessment plan for the year 2) when completed forms the annual assessment report The template is completed to report assessment results for the system as a whole and then to report the results campus by campus. Rows can be added to report multiple assessments for a single PLO including additional direct assessment or indirect assessments (e.g. surveys). 5.10
11 System-wide Summary PLO No. PLO wording Course code Assessment Task/Instrument Target Location All Campuses No. of Students Result Analysis Areas for Action Breakdown by Campus - add a new row(s) for each campus as required. PLO No. PLO wording Course code Assessment Task/Instrument Target Campus No. of Students Result Analysis Areas for Action Notes Target: the default (80% of students achieving standard) may be changed to reflect the academic judgment of the level of challenge of the assessment task. Analysis: Focus should be on identifying areas for improving student learning e.g. curriculum, delivery, resources, student progression etc. Areas for Action: Summarise key areas for improvement. Use the separate Action Plan Template to provide detail & timelines. Important: a 'Timeline' is required for each action. Actions to improve the assessment itself or target set affect the quality of the process and do not improve student learning. They should be noted here but not be included in the detailed Action Plan. Areas for Action Actions for improvement are the key outcomes of the assessment process and should be completed for the System and separately by each campus. The purpose of these actions is to improve student learning and provide evidence to stakeholders and accreditation agencies of the use of assessment results to improve the quality of the academic program and to enhance student learning. Each area for action should have its own Action Plan which provides further details and timelines of the actions to be taken. Action Plan Template Objective Priority Action to be taken Success indicator(s) Owner Target date Status Evaluation 5.11
12 Responsibilities: Programme Learning Outcome Assessment Program Learning Outcome Assessment (PLOA) Program & Curricula Initiates the PLO Assessment process Provides PLOA templates for plans and reports Reviews Faculty PLOA plans Reviews PLOA Reports from Academic Faculties Publishes PLOA Plans and Reports Approves any update/change to published plans The Faculty Executive Dean with the support of the Faculty Academic and faculty members: Submits a 3-year PLOA plan for each program for review by Programme and Curricula Ensures that 100% of PLOs are assessed over a 3 year period with at least 30% of all PLOs assessed in each academic year Produces an Annual PLOA plan for each Diploma, Higher Diploma and Bachelor program Implements the annual assessment plan consistently across classes and delivery sites and collects data Analyzes data and develops action plans Reports results and analysis and action plans to Programme and Curricula Ensures that an electronic file containing copies of each PLO assessment and samples of student work reflecting range of performance is maintained Ensures that action plans to improve program quality are implemented and evaluated Timeline Action Responsibility When Annual PLO Assessment Plan Draft By end of March Plan Endorsement Program & Curriculum By end of April PLO Assessment Administration Fall & Spring Semesters Annual PLO Assessment Report & Action Plan completed Review of Program Reports & Action Plans Program & Curriculum By end of August By end of September 5.12
13 Annual Academic Programme Audit Purpose The purpose of the Annual Academic Program Audit is to evaluate key indicators to identify any issues and take action to improve program quality. Requirement Each is required to complete an annual internal review for each programme and major under its responsibility. The report is a critical evaluation of: Need for the programme by business and society Demand for the programme by students Curriculum Student learning Faculty Resourcing Continuous Quality Improvement Processes Process Annual PLO Assessments Annual Program Audit Report Review program quality indicators Evaluate actions for quality improvement Implement Actions for quality improvement Academic Council Approve Actions for quality improvement Annual Program Audit Report Process Curriculum Quality Assurance Endorse Report & Action Plan Recommend quality improvement measures Action Plan to improve program quality Program & Curricula Review Report & Action PLan 5.13
14 Responsibilities: Annual Program Audit Program Review Component Programs and Curricula Academic Faculty CQA Academic Council Annual Program Audit Initiates the Annual Program Audit process Ensures the implementation of the Annual Program Audit Report process Provides templates for Annual Program Audit Reports Endorses the nominated Audit Team for each programme Reviews the Annual Program Audit Report for each program The Faculty Executive Dean with the support of the Faculty Academic and faculty members: Identify an Audit Team for each programme Conduct Annual Program Audit critically evaluating the need, demand, resourcing and quality for each programme Complete Annual Program Audit Report including Action Plan for improvement for each programme Recommends academic programs to undergo immediate cyclical program review to the Academic Council Recommends measures for improving programme quality to Academic Council Receives reports from the Curriculum Quality Assurance Approves academic programs to undergo immediate cyclical program review to the Academic Council Endorses recommendations for improving programme quality Publishes all Annual Program Audit Reports Recommends academic programs for further review to the Programme Quality Review Provides an Annual Academic Affairs Program Audit Report to the Programme Quality Review Submits an Annual Faculty Program Audit Report reviewing & summarizing programme reports to Program and Curricula Implements Action Plan and recommendations from Academic Council for improving programme quality 5.14
15 Timeline Action Responsibility By end of Annual Programme Audit Report completed for each active programme and major Faculty Executive Dean October 2017 Annual Faculty Executive Summary completed Faculty Executive Dean November 2017 Review Annual Academic Affairs Report completed Recommendations for improving programs and review process Manager Program Review and Improvement Executive Dean Program and Curricula Curriculum Quality Assurance December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 Endorsement of CQA recommendations Academic Council March 2018 Evidence Key Focus Area Student Learning Main Evidence Program learning outcome assessment reports Satisfaction surveys: Exiting Students, Graduates (alumni), Graduate Employers Curriculum: currency & relevance Satisfaction surveys: Graduates (Alumni), Graduate Employers; Faculty Evaluation (Program Effectiveness Survey) Industry Advisory / Industry Advisory Board Feedback Cohort Analysis Demand/Need for the program Institutional Research Data: Student enrolment, attrition, at-risk students, CGPA, graduation rate Employment Rates; Satisfaction surveys: Exiting Students, Graduates (alumni), Graduate Employers; Industry Advisory / Industry Advisory Board Feedback Feedback from learners Resources: faculty, teaching & learning, facilities Satisfaction surveys: Exiting Students, Graduates (alumni Faculty Complement analysis, Workload data Faculty Evaluation (Program Effectiveness Survey) Satisfaction Surveys: Student Services, Staff Services Sources of Evidence Programme Learning Outcome (PLO) Assessment Reports PLO Assessment Reports are available from the refer above for further detail. The requirement is: Each programme learning outcome is assessed at least once over a three year period A minimum of 30% of programme learning outcomes are assessed each academic year. 5.15
16 Assessment Reports Reports of student performance on course assessments are published after each Semester either on the Portal egradebook or the Academic Programme Review Dashboard of the IEMS. The following reports are available: egradebook Reports The following are available through the HCT Intranet Portal and report the median, mean, and distribution of grades for coursework and final assessments: CSA (Common Specification Assessment) Analysis Report by CSA Analysis Report by campus CSA Analysis Report by course CSA Analysis Report by CRN Course Learning Outcome Report (under development) Dashboard Reports The following are available through the Academic Programme Review Dashboard of the IEMS and report grade distributions and grade point averages by course and programme: Grade Distribution Report by Grade Distribution Report by Course Average Course Grade Point Average Cumulative Grade Point Average by Programme Cohort Analysis The following data are available through the Academic Programme Review Dashboard of the IEMS: Enrolment Attrition rate Average class absences Students on probation Graduation rate Employment rate Surveys The following surveys are available through the Academic Programme Review Dashboard of the IEMS: Internal Student Satisfaction with Programme (Every Term) Campus Programme Chair Survey (Every Year) External Graduate Satisfaction Survey (Every Term) Graduate Employer Survey (Every Year) External Stakeholder Input The following are available from the : Industry Advisory feedback Accreditation reports 5.16
17 Cyclical Programme Review Purpose The purpose of the Cyclical Program Review is to decide on whether to continue offering the program or to teach-out the program at the HCT or at particular campuses. Requirement Each active programme and major is required to undergo a periodic review notwithstanding any national or international accreditation. However, Academic Faculties are recommended to synchronise the HCT s Cyclical Program Review with external program accreditation reviews wherever feasible. The Cyclical Program Review is a critical evaluation of the academic quality and demand for the program over the previous years and is based on evidence and trend analysis provided by the Annual Program Audit Reports produced in that period. Programmes are periodically reviewed according to length of credential: Two Year Diplomas: every 3 years Three Year Higher Diplomas: every 4 years Four Year Bachelors: every 5 years Two Year Masters: every 3 years 5.17
18 Process Annual PLO Assessments Annual Program Audit Reports Self-Study Bachelor s: every 5 years Higher Diploma: every 4 years Diploma: every 3 years Decision Continuance - Academic Council Discontinue at campus(es) Executive Close program - Board of Trustees External Review Team Report Cyclical Program Review Cycle Academic Council Recommendation Program & Curricula Review Curriculum Quality Assurance Review Self-study The responsible completes a Self-Study including analyses of its: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (i.e. SWOT analysis); Need by industry and society; Demand by students; Academic quality e.g. are students achieving the programme learning outcomes; are academic standards consistently maintained, are faculty delivering the program appropriate qualified and experienced etc; Budget efficiency. For further information refer to the Program Review Site 5.18
19 External Review Team Report The External Review Team (ERT) is appointed by the Executive Dean Programme & Curriculum in consultation with the relevant Executive Dean. The ERT: Verifies and evaluates the Self-study. Makes site visits - depending on the nature of the program and the evidence presented in the selfstudy, the ERT, after consultation with the ADVC Programme & Curriculum, may make site visits to all or a sample of campuses and delivery sites to evaluate facilities and resources. Interviews program managers, faculty, current students, alumni, and external stakeholders (e.g. employers), as feasible. Makes a recommendation for continuance of the program. 5.19
20 Responsibilities: Cyclical Program Review (CPR) Programs and Curricula Academic Faculty External Review Team CQA Academic Council Executive Board of Trustees Initiates the CPR process Ensures the implementation of the CPR process Provides templates for CPR Approves the review team responsible for writing the Program Self-Study Report Approves the External Review Team responsible for reviewing the Program Self-Study Report and conducting campus visits Reviews the CPR Report for each academic program Recommends the internal team to write Self-Study Team for each programme under review Recommends the External Review Team to evaluate the program Completes Program Self- Study Report including critically evaluation of previous Annual Program Audit Reports for each programme under review Makes a recommendation on the continuation of the program Implements recommendations from Academic Council for improving programme quality Critically evaluates the Program Self-Study Report Conducts campus visits evaluating teaching and learning resources, facilities, and interviewing stakeholders including students and faculty Makes a recommendation on the continuation of the program Approves the timetable for the CPR of each academic program Receives and reviews CPR Reports Makes recommendations for program continuance to Academic Council Makes recommendations for improving programme quality to Academic Council Approves continuance of an academic program Recommends discontinuation of an academic program at one or more campuses or across the HCT Endorses recommendations for improving programme quality Approves discontinuation of an academic program at one or more campuses Approves discontinuation of an academic program across the HCT 5.20
21 Timeline Action Responsibility By end of Calendar for program cyclical review Programmes nominated in addition to the calendar cyclical review CQA CQA April May Programme Self Study Completed Faculty Executive Dean October Programme Quality Review Completed External Review Team November Recommendation Programme & Curriculum December Endorses recommendations Academic Council January Continuance: Executive Programme Review Decisions Change and areas of improvement made to programme and courses Discontinuance at a campus: Executive Discontinuance across HCT: Board of Trustees Faculty Executive Dean February As appropriate Policy and Procedures LP225 Course & Program Review 5.21
Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning
Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning By Peggy L. Maki, Senior Scholar, Assessing for Learning American Association for Higher Education (pre-publication version of article that
More informationStandards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS
Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS World Headquarters 11520 West 119th Street Overland Park, KS 66213 USA USA Belgium Perú acbsp.org info@acbsp.org
More informationNavitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education February 2014 Annex: Birmingham City University International College Introduction
More informationVolunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,
Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan, 2005-2010 Mission: Volunteer State Community College is a public, comprehensive community college offering associate degrees, certificates, continuing
More informationRevision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience
Revision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience Revision of Core Program In 2009 a Core Curriculum Task Force with representatives from every academic division was appointed by
More informationProcedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review
Procedures for Academic Program Review Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review Last Revision: August 2013 1 Table of Contents Background and BOG Requirements... 2 Rationale
More informationCourse Specification Executive MBA via e-learning (MBUSP)
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY Course Specification Executive MBA via e-learning 2017-18 (MBUSP) www.leedsbeckett.ac.uk Course Specification Executive MBA via e-learning Faculty: School: Faculty of Business
More informationAssessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)
Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011) Health professions education programs - Conceptual framework The University of Rochester interdisciplinary program in Health Professions
More informationSELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR REVIEW of the COMPUTER SCIENCE PROGRAM and the INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROGRAM
Disclaimer: This Self Study was developed to meet the goals of the CAC Session at the 2006 Summit. It should not be considered as a model or a template. ABET SELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR REVIEW of the
More informationLinguistics Program Outcomes Assessment 2012
Linguistics Program Outcomes Assessment 2012 BA in Linguistics / MA in Applied Linguistics Compiled by Siri Tuttle, Program Head The mission of the UAF Linguistics Program is to promote a broader understanding
More informationNottingham Trent University Course Specification
Nottingham Trent University Course Specification Basic Course Information 1. Awarding Institution: Nottingham Trent University 2. School/Campus: Nottingham Business School / City 3. Final Award, Course
More informationABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs
ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs Mapped to 2008 NSSE Survey Questions First Edition, June 2008 Introduction and Rationale for Using NSSE in ABET Accreditation One of the most common
More informationAssessment of Student Academic Achievement
Assessment of Student Academic Achievement 13 Chapter Parkland s commitment to the assessment of student academic achievement and its documentation is reflected in the college s mission statement; it also
More informationVOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION CONTENTS Vol Vision 2020 Summary Overview Approach Plan Phase 1 Key Initiatives, Timelines, Accountability Strategy Dashboard Phase 1 Metrics and Indicators
More informationJuly 17, 2017 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL. John Tafaro, President Chatfield College State Route 251 St. Martin, OH Dear President Tafaro:
July 17, 2017 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL John Tafaro, President Chatfield College 20918 State Route 251 St. Martin, OH 45118 Dear President Tafaro: This letter is formal notification of action taken by the Higher
More informationSTUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION
300-37 Administrative Procedure 360 STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION Background Maintaining a comprehensive system of student assessment and evaluation is an integral component of the teaching-learning
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. By-Law 1: The Faculty Council...3
FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, University of Ottawa Faculty By-Laws (November 21, 2017) TABLE OF CONTENTS By-Law 1: The Faculty Council....3 1.1 Mandate... 3 1.2 Members... 3 1.3 Procedures for electing Faculty
More informationContract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)
Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4) Evidence Used in Evaluation Rubric (5) Evaluation Cycle: Training (6) Evaluation Cycle: Annual Orientation (7) Evaluation Cycle:
More informationIntroduction 3. Outcomes of the Institutional audit 3. Institutional approach to quality enhancement 3
De Montfort University March 2009 Annex to the report Contents Introduction 3 Outcomes of the Institutional audit 3 Institutional approach to quality enhancement 3 Institutional arrangements for postgraduate
More informationChapter 2. University Committee Structure
Chapter 2 University Structure 2. UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE STRUCTURE This chapter provides details of the membership and terms of reference of Senate, the University s senior academic committee, and its Standing
More informationI. Proposal presentations should follow Degree Quality Assessment Board (DQAB) format.
NEW GRADUATE PROGRAM ASSESSMENT CRITERIA POLICY NUMBER ED 8-5 REVIEW DATE SEPTEMBER 27, 2015 AUTHORITY PRIMARY CONTACT SENATE ASSOCIATE VICE-PRESIDENT, RESEARCH AND GRADUATE STUDIES POLICY The criteria
More informationThe Characteristics of Programs of Information
ACRL stards guidelines Characteristics of programs of information literacy that illustrate best practices: A guideline by the ACRL Information Literacy Best Practices Committee Approved by the ACRL Board
More informationColorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans
Colorado State University Department of Construction Management Assessment Results and Action Plans Updated: Spring 2015 Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 List of Tables... 3 Table of Figures...
More informationMathematics Program Assessment Plan
Mathematics Program Assessment Plan Introduction This assessment plan is tentative and will continue to be refined as needed to best fit the requirements of the Board of Regent s and UAS Program Review
More informationASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY The assessment of student learning begins with educational values. Assessment is not an end in itself but a vehicle
More informationHigher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd
Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd June 2016 Contents About this review... 1 Key findings... 2 QAA's judgements about Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd...
More informationHigher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College
Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd April 2016 Contents About this review... 1 Key findings... 2 QAA's judgements about... 2 Good practice... 2 Theme: Digital Literacies...
More informationANNUAL CURRICULUM REVIEW PROCESS for the 2016/2017 Academic Year
ANNUAL CURRICULUM REVIEW PROCESS for the 2016/2017 Academic Year Annual Curriculum review is a process undertaken in advance of each new academic year to renew, revise and update curriculum. Faculty members,
More informationDepartment of Geography Bachelor of Arts in Geography Plan for Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes The University of New Mexico
Department of Geography Bachelor of Arts in Geography Plan for Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes The University of New Mexico A. College, Department and Date 1. College: College of Arts & Sciences
More informationCAUL Principles and Guidelines for Library Services to Onshore Students at Remote Campuses to Support Teaching and Learning
CAUL Principles and Guidelines for Library Services to Onshore Students at Remote Campuses to Support Teaching and Learning Context The following guidelines have been developed as an aid for Australian
More informationComprehensive Program Review Report (Narrative) College of the Sequoias
Program Review - Child Development Comprehensive Program Review Report (Narrative) College of the Sequoias Program Review - Child Development Prepared by: San Dee Hodges, Rebecca Griffith, Gwenette Aytman
More informationStudent Learning Outcomes: A new model of assessment
Student Learning Outcomes: A new model of assessment Proposed Spring 2012 by members of the Teaching and Learning Project: Tawny Beal, Scott Cabral, Christina Goff, Mike Grillo, Kiran Kamath, Cindy McGrath,
More informationUniversity of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Programmatic Evaluation Plan
University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2015 Programmatic Evaluation Plan The purpose of this document is to establish and describe the programmatic evaluation plan
More informationMaster of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration
Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in Leadership in Educational Administration Effective October 9, 2017 Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in Leadership in
More informationGUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION
GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION A Publication of the Accrediting Commission For Community and Junior Colleges Western Association of Schools and Colleges For use in
More informationAPAC Accreditation Summary Assessment Report Department of Psychology, James Cook University
APAC Accreditation Summary Assessment Report Department of Psychology, James Cook University Higher Education Provider James Cook University, Department of Psychology Date of determination 20 December
More informationFocus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION
Focus on Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL ACCREDITING COMMISSION FOR SCHOOLS, WESTERN ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES www.acswasc.org 10/10/12 2013 WASC EDITION Focus on Learning THE ACCREDITATION
More informationSELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR REVIEW of the COMPUTER SCIENCE PROGRAM
Disclaimer: This Self Study was developed to meet the goals of the CAC Session at the 2006 Summit. It should not be considered as a model or a template. ABET Computing Accreditation Commission SELF-STUDY
More informationProgramme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate
Programme Specification MSc in International Real Estate IRE GUIDE OCTOBER 2014 ROYAL AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, CIRENCESTER PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MSc International Real Estate NB The information contained
More informationHigher Education Review of University of Hertfordshire
Higher Education Review of University of Hertfordshire December 2015 Contents About this review... 1 Key findings... 2 QAA's judgements about the University of Hertfordshire... 2 Good practice... 2 Affirmation
More informationProgramme Specification
Programme Specification Title of Course: Foundation Year in Science, Computing & Mathematics Date Specification Produced: January 2013 Date Specification Last Revised: May 2013 This Programme Specification
More informationProgram Change Proposal:
Program Change Proposal: Provided to Faculty in the following affected units: Department of Management Department of Marketing School of Allied Health 1 Department of Kinesiology 2 Department of Animal
More informationPhysician Assistant Program Goals, Indicators and Outcomes Report
Physician Assistant Program Goals, Indicators and Outcomes Report 2007-2016 UAB PA Program Goals and Outcomes University of Alabama at Birmingham Master of Science in Physician Assistant Studies Physician
More informationTeaching Excellence Framework
Teaching Excellence Framework Role specification: Subject Pilot and Year Three Panel members and assessors 13 September 2017 Contents Background... 2 Introduction... 2 Application process... 3 Subject
More informationDOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL Overview of the Doctor of Philosophy Board The Doctor of Philosophy Board (DPB) is a standing committee of the Johns Hopkins University that reports
More informationPakistan Engineering Council. PEVs Guidelines
Pakistan Engineering Council PEVs Guidelines GUIDELINES FOR PEVs 2017 Pakistan Engineering Council GUIDELINES FOR PROGRAM EVALUATORS Preface Pakistan Engineering Council (PEC) has always strived hard to
More informationLoyalist College Applied Degree Proposal. Name of Institution: Loyalist College of Applied Arts and Technology
College and Program Information 1.0 Submission Cover 1.1 College Information Name of Institution: Loyalist College of Applied Arts and Technology Title of Program: Bachelor of Applied Arts (Human Services
More informationState Parental Involvement Plan
A Toolkit for Title I Parental Involvement Section 3 Tools Page 41 Tool 3.1: State Parental Involvement Plan Description This tool serves as an example of one SEA s plan for supporting LEAs and schools
More informationEmbedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
Bellerbys Educational Services Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education May 2012 Annex 2: University of Huddersfield International Study
More informationSaint Louis University Program Assessment Plan. Program Learning Outcomes Curriculum Mapping Assessment Methods Use of Assessment Data
Saint Louis University Program Assessment Plan Program (Major, Minor, Core): Sociology Department: Anthropology & Sociology College/School: College of Arts & Sciences Person(s) Responsible for Implementing
More informationQuality assurance of Authority-registered subjects and short courses
Quality assurance of Authority-registered subjects and short courses 170133 The State of Queensland () 2017 PO Box 307 Spring Hill QLD 4004 Australia 154 Melbourne Street, South Brisbane Phone: (07) 3864
More informationMandatory Review of Social Skills Qualifications. Consultation document for Approval to List
Mandatory Review of Social Skills Qualifications Consultation document for Approval to List February 2015 Prepared by: National Qualifications Services on behalf of the Social Skills Governance Group 1
More informationDelaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators
Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators DPAS-II Guide for Administrators (Assistant Principals) Guide for Evaluating Assistant Principals Revised August
More informationWorld s Best Workforce Plan
2017-18 World s Best Workforce Plan District or Charter Name: PiM Arts High School, 4110-07 Contact Person Name and Position Matt McFarlane, Executive Director In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section
More informationSelf Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT
Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT 84341-5600 Document Generated On June 13, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Standard 1: Purpose and Direction 2 Standard 2: Governance
More informationFY16 UW-Parkside Institutional IT Plan Report
FY16 UW-Parkside Institutional IT Plan Report A. Information Technology & University Strategic Objectives [1-2 pages] 1. How was the plan developed? The plan is a compilation of input received from a wide
More informationProgramme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT
Programme Specification BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT D GUIDE SEPTEMBER 2016 ROYAL AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, CIRENCESTER PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT NB The information contained
More informationProgramme Specification. MSc in Palliative Care: Global Perspectives (Distance Learning) Valid from: September 2012 Faculty of Health & Life Sciences
Programme Specification MSc in Palliative Care: Global Perspectives (Distance Learning) Valid from: September 2012 Faculty of Health & Life Sciences SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION Awarding body: Teaching
More informationSchool Inspection in Hesse/Germany
Hessisches Kultusministerium School Inspection in Hesse/Germany Contents 1. Introduction...2 2. School inspection as a Procedure for Quality Assurance and Quality Enhancement...2 3. The Hessian framework
More informationEducational Quality Assurance Standards. Residential Juvenile Justice Commitment Programs DRAFT
Educational Quality Assurance Standards Residential Juvenile Justice Commitment Programs 2009 2010 Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services Division of K-12 Public Schools Florida Department
More informationNew Program Process, Guidelines and Template
New Program Process, Guidelines and Template This document outlines the process and guidelines for the Florida Tech academic units to introduce new programs (options, minors, degree, for-credit certificate
More informationP920 Higher Nationals Recognition of Prior Learning
P920 Higher Nationals Recognition of Prior Learning 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Peterborough Regional College is committed to ensuring the decision making process and outcomes for admitting students with prior
More informationPROGRAMME SPECIFICATION
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION 1 Awarding Institution Newcastle University 2 Teaching Institution Newcastle University 3 Final Award MSc 4 Programme Title Digital Architecture 5 UCAS/Programme Code 5112 6 Programme
More informationTREATMENT OF SMC COURSEWORK FOR STUDENTS WITHOUT AN ASSOCIATE OF ARTS
Articulation Agreement REGIS UNIVERSITY Associate s to Bachelor s Program PURPOSE The purpose of the agreement is to enable SMC students who transfer to Regis with an Associate of Arts to be recognized
More informationPOLICIES AND PROCEDURES
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON - CLEAR LAKE School of Education POLICIES AND PROCEDURES December 10, 2004 Version 8.3 SCHOOL OF EDUCATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE PREAMBLE...
More informationSORRELL COLLEGE OF BUSINESS
43 The vision of the Sorrell College of Business is to be the first choice for higher business education students in their quest to succeed in a dynamic and global economy. Sorrell College of Business
More informationThe College of Law Mission Statement
The College of Law Mission Statement The mission of the College of Law is to create an intellectual environment that prepares students in the legal practice of their choice, enhances the College s regional
More informationIndiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process
Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning ICPBL Certification mission is to PBL Certification Process ICPBL Processing Center c/o CELL 1400 East Hanna Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46227 (317) 791-5702
More informationThe Teaching and Learning Center
The Teaching and Learning Center Created in Fall 1996 with the aid of a federal Title III grant, the purpose of LMC s Teaching and Learning Center (TLC) is to introduce new teaching methods and classroom
More informationCase of the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the Lebanese. International University
Journal of Modern Education Review, ISSN 2155-7993, USA July 2014, Volume 4, No. 7, pp. 555 563 Doi: 10.15341/jmer(2155-7993)/07.04.2014/008 Academic Star Publishing Company, 2014 http://www.academicstar.us
More informationStatewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System
Statewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System Decision Point Outline December 14, 2009 Vision CalSWEC, the schools of social work, the regional training academies,
More informationSPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM
SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM (Revised 11/2014) 1 Fern Ridge Schools Specialist Performance Review and Evaluation System TABLE OF CONTENTS Timeline of Teacher Evaluation and Observations
More informationNational Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results
Introduction The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) is administered by hundreds of colleges and universities every year (560 in 2016), and is designed to measure the amount of time and effort
More informationCurriculum Development Manual: Academic Disciplines
0990 SAN JACINTO COLLEGE DISTRICT Curriculum Development Manual: Academic Disciplines 2017-2018 Developed and Compiled by the Curriculum Process Task Force Originally Adopted May, 1999 Revised May 2017
More informationYouth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General
Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ Office of the Deputy Director General Produced by the Pedagogical Management Team Joe MacNeil, Ida Gilpin, Kim Quinn with the assisstance of John Weideman and
More informationIdsall External Examinations Policy
Idsall External Examinations Policy Sponsorship & Review 1 Sponsor Mr D Crichton, Deputy Headteacher 2 Written and Approved October 2014 3 Next Review Date October 2016 This policy should be read in conjunction
More informationPROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program
PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM Institution Submitting Proposal Degree Designation as on Diploma Title of Proposed Degree Program EEO Status CIP Code Academic Unit (e.g. Department, Division, School)
More informationLearning Objectives by Course Matrix Objectives Course # Course Name Psyc Know ledge
APPENDICES Learning Objectives by Course Matrix Objectives Course # Course Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Psyc Know ledge Integration across domains Psyc as Science Critical Thinking Diversity Ethics Applying
More informationChart 5: Overview of standard C
Chart 5: Overview of standard C Overview of levels of achievement of the standards in section C Indicate with X the levels of achievement for the standards as identified by each subject group in the table
More informationProgram Guidebook. Endorsement Preparation Program, Educational Leadership
Program Guidebook Endorsement Preparation Program, Educational Leadership The Endorsement Preparation Program in Educational Leadership is a competency-based degree program that prepares students at the
More informationProviding Feedback to Learners. A useful aide memoire for mentors
Providing Feedback to Learners A useful aide memoire for mentors January 2013 Acknowledgments Our thanks go to academic and clinical colleagues who have helped to critique and add to this document and
More informationSTANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION
Arizona Department of Education Tom Horne, Superintendent of Public Instruction STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 5 REVISED EDITION Arizona Department of Education School Effectiveness Division
More informationMASTER OF EDUCATION DEGREE: PHYSICAL EDUCATION GRADUATE MANUAL
MASTER OF EDUCATION DEGREE: PHYSICAL EDUCATION GRADUATE MANUAL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, HUMAN PERFORMANCE & RECREATION November 2017 M.Ed. in Physical Education University of Arkansas Introduction The Master
More informationExpanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation
I. ELT Design is Driven by Focused School-wide Priorities The school s ELT design (schedule, staff, instructional approaches, assessment systems, budget) is driven by no more than three school-wide priorities,
More informationAssessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016
KPI SUMMARY REPORT Assessment for Student Learning: -level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016 BACKGROUND Assessment for Student Learning is a key performance indicator aligned to the
More informationPREPARING FOR THE SITE VISIT IN YOUR FUTURE
PREPARING FOR THE SITE VISIT IN YOUR FUTURE ARC-PA Suzanne York SuzanneYork@arc-pa.org 2016 PAEA Education Forum Minneapolis, MN Saturday, October 15, 2016 TODAY S SESSION WILL INCLUDE: Recommendations
More informationAB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:
AB104 Adult Education Block Grant Performance Year: 2015-2016 Funding source: AB104, Section 39, Article 9 Version 1 Release: October 9, 2015 Reporting & Submission Process Required Funding Recipient Content
More informationWeek 4: Action Planning and Personal Growth
Week 4: Action Planning and Personal Growth Overview So far in the Comprehensive Needs Assessment of your selected campus, you have analyzed demographic and student learning data through the AYP report,
More informationPrince2 Foundation and Practitioner Training Exam Preparation
Prince2 Foundation and Practitioner Training Exam Preparation Prince2 is the UK Government Best Practice standard and is widely recognized and used for effective Project management methodology and tools.
More informationBold resourcefulness: redefining employability and entrepreneurial learning
Title Type URL Bold resourcefulness: redefining employability and entrepreneurial learning Report Date 2008 Citation Creators http://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/671/ Ball, Linda (2008) Bold resourcefulness:
More informationColorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report
Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for 2015-16 Online UIP Report Organization Code: 2690 District Name: PUEBLO CITY 60 Official 2014 SPF: 1-Year Executive Summary How are students performing?
More informationReport of External Evaluation and Review
Report of External Evaluation and Review Ashton Warner Nanny Academy Highly Confident in educational performance Highly Confident in capability in self-assessment Date of report: 15 August 2014 Contents
More informationEnvision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals
Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals Institutional Priority: Improve the front door experience Identify metrics appropriate to
More informationUniversity of the Arts London (UAL) Diploma in Professional Studies Art and Design Date of production/revision May 2015
Programme Specification Every taught course of study leading to a UAL award is required to have a Programme Specification. This summarises the course aims, learning outcomes, teaching, learning and assessment
More informationEDUCATION. Readmission. Residency Requirements and Time Limits. Transfer of Credits. Rules and Procedures. Program of Study
Education 1 EDUCATION In conjunction with the Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies, the College of Education, Health, and Human Services of the UM- Dearborn offers a Master of Arts in Education
More informationQualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools
Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools Updated November 2013 DC Public Charter School Board 3333 14 th Street NW, Suite 210 Washington, DC 20010 Phone: 202-328-2600 Fax: 202-328-2661 Table
More informationGuidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU)
Guidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU) The UNC Policy Manual The essential educational mission of the University is augmented through a broad range of activities generally categorized
More informationARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY PROPOSAL TO ESTABLISH A NEW GRADUATE DEGREE
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY PROPOSAL TO ESTABLISH A NEW GRADUATE DEGREE DEGREE PROGRAM Gollege/School(s) offering this degree: W. P. Carey School of Business Unit(s) within college/school responsible for
More informationAppendix IX. Resume of Financial Aid Director. Professional Development Training
Appendix IX Resume of Financial Aid Director Professional Development Training ALBERT TEZENO 6815 Chapelfield Houston Texas 77049 Tezeno_aj@yahoo.com 281-459-4114 cell 832-642-6937 Director of Financial
More informationBarstow Community College NON-INSTRUCTIONAL
Barstow Community College NON-INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM REVIEW (Refer to the Program Review Handbook when completing this form) SERVICE AREA/ ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT: Transfer and Career Planning Center Academic
More information