Guiding Subject Liaison Librarians in Understanding and Acting on User Survey Results

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Guiding Subject Liaison Librarians in Understanding and Acting on User Survey Results"

Cameron Spencer
6 years ago
Views:

1 Guiding Subject Liaison Librarians in Understanding and Acting on User Survey Results A Model LibQUAL+ Consultation from ARL Raynna Bowlby, Consultant (raynna.bowlby@charter.net) Francine DeFranco, Director, Library Research Services Liaison Librarian to the Neag School of Education University of Connecticut Libraries (francine.defranco@uconn.edu) With acknowledgement of Martha Kyrillidou, Senior Director, ARL Statistics and Service Quality Programs

2 Guiding Subject Liaison Librarians in Understanding and Acting on User Survey Results A Model LibQUAL+ Consultation from ARL Assessment librarians cannot single-handedly implement improvements for users Staff throughout the library must be able to understand, interpret and act upon user survey results Consultation tailored to develop subject librarians ability: Hear notable findings from the experts and understand survey results gap analyses, longitudinal trends & specific peers Mine data by separate user populations & discipline groups Develop actionable goals and objectives for the UConn Libraries Strategic Plan related to Graduate Education and Research, Scholarship and Creative Activity Identify metrics from LibQUAL+ survey items to serve as targets for continuous improvement & measures of impact

Consultation Objective #1: Understand Gap Analysis and Zones of

UConn Core Summary - 2008 9 8 7 6 5 AS-1 AS-2 AS-3 AS-4 AS-5 AS-6 AS-7

LP-5 Interpreting Perceived Scores Against Minimally- Acceptable &

3 Consultation Objective #1: Understand Gap Analysis and Zones of Tolerance Are the Libraries Putting their Efforts into User Priorities? UConn Core Summary AS-1 AS-2 AS-3 AS-4 AS-5 AS-6 AS-7 AS-8 AS-9 IC-1 IC-2 IC-3 IC-4 IC-5 IC-6 IC-7 IC-8 LP-1 LP-2 LP-3 LP-4 LP-5 Interpreting Perceived Scores Against Minimally- Acceptable & Desired Service Levels (i.e., Zones of Tolerance ) Grad - Humanities Grad Sci, Pharm, Nursing

4 Consultation Objective #1: Understand Benchmarking Against Self, Longitudinally Are the Libraries Continuously Improving? General Satisfaction Grad Students 2004 to 2008 Overall Perceived by Discipline 2004 to 2008 for Graduates In general, I am satisfied with the way in which I am treated at the library. In general, I am satisfied with library support for my learning, research, and/or teaching needs. How would you rate the overall quality of the service provided by the library? Agr. / Envir. Studies Arch. Bus. Comm. / Journal. Edu. Eng. / Comp. Sci. General Studies Health Sciences Human. Law Mil. / Naval Sci. Other PFA Sci. / Math Soc. Sci. / Psych. Undecid. Nobody is more like me than me! Anonymous

5 Consultation Objective #1: Understand Benchmarking Against Peers Do Target User Groups Receive Library Services as Good as or Better than Peers? 9 Peer Comparison General Satisfaction 9 Peer Comparison General Satisfaction 9 Peer Comparison General Satisfaction H F A C B E UCONN G D In general, I am satisfied with the way in which I am treated at the library. 6 H A C E F G UCONN D B In general, I am satisfied with library support for my learning, research, and/or teaching needs. Benchmarking Against Peer Institutions 1,000,000 Users; 1,000 Institutions! 6 H A C F B E G UCONN D How would you rate the overall quality of the service provided by the library? Peer Comparison Overall Perceived Summary - Graduates C F H A B UCONN D G E

6 Consultation Objective #2: Learn how to drill down by User Population In 2008, Graduate Students Highest Desired Services are Highest Desired Services Rating IC-1 Making electronic resources accessible from home or office 8.57 IC-8 Print and/or electronic journal collections that I require for my work 8.48 IC-2 A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own 8.43 IC-4 The electronic information resources that I need 8.43 IC-5 Modern equipment that lets me easily access needed information 8.34 IC-6 Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own 8.34 IC-7 Making information easily accessible for independent use 8.34

7 Consultation Objective #2: Learn how to drill down by User Population In 2008, Graduate Students Least Adequate Services are Lowest Adequate Means IC-8 Print and/or electronic journal collections that I require for my work Mean -.05 IC-2 A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own.08 IC-4 The electronic information resources that I need.17 IC-5 Modern equipment that lets me easily access needed information.20 IC-1 Making electronic resources accessible from home or office.21

8 Consultation Objective #2: Learn how to drill down by Individual Discipline How do we identify what s actionable for target groups, grounded in survey data? DESIRED, Most desired #1 #3 MOST DESIRED and LEAST ADEQUATE MOST DESIRED and MOST ADEQUATE (lowest weakness/ ADEQUACY, (highest weakness) highest strength) ADEQUACY, Least adequate Most adequate #2 #4 LEAST ADEQUATE MOST ADEQUATE (highest weakness) and (lowest weakness/ highest strength) LEAST DESIRED and DESIRED, Least desired LEAST DESIRED

9 Consultation Objective #2: Learn how to drill down by Individual Discipline How do we identify what s actionable for Humanities Disciplines Grad Students?

10 Consultation Objective #2: Learn how to drill down by Individual Discipline How do we identify what s actionable for Science Disciplines Grad Students?

11 Consultation Objective #3: Facilitate the Writing of Goals based on Data How do we identify what s actionable for Science Disciplines Grad Students? Writing S.M.A.R.T. Goals S M A R T Specific the desired outcome or result is clearly defined Measurable accomplishment can be charted and/or observed Attainable achievable, goal is challenging but realistic Relevant results-oriented, in line with institutional goals and library vision Timely deadlines are set for accomplishment Example: 60% courses utilizing WebCT include links to library research materials by 9/10 Versus general goal: Make materials accessible to users where they are

12 UConn s Academic Strategic Plan Advancing UConn s Standing in 5 Areas Undergraduate Education Graduate & Professional Education Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activity Diversity Public Engagement UConn Libraries Strategic Plan Goal 2: Enhance strategic graduate and professional programs through active library liaison engagement and resource support. Goal 3: Actively support faculty, student and staff research, scholarship and creative endeavors through quality instruction, liaison collaboration, collections, and information access.

13 UConn Libraries Strategic Plan Examples of Metrics and Targets Using LibQUAL+ Library Metric Baseline Goal Increase the perceived level of service quality in ranking of print or electronic journal collections needed for All users Increase the perceived level of service quality in ranking of electronic information resources needed for All users Increase perceived level of service quality in ranking of easy to use access tools for All users Increase Undergraduates perceived level of service quality ranking of modern equipment that lets me easily access needed information. Increase Undergraduates perceived level of service quality ranking of library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own. Increase Undergraduates perceived level of service quality ranking of quiet space for individual activities

14 What Have We Done So Far for Graduate Students? Increased the number of electronic journals across disciplines Improved electronic access to a wide variety of collections, resources, and services Purchased electronic books, reference materials and historical information as identified by specific disciplines Improved interlibrary loan request and tracking Identified potential library space dedicated for graduate student use

15 What Have We Done So Far for Graduate Students? Expanded streamed video and audio collections Revised and expanded instruction and consultation services customized for graduate students by discipline Established opportunities for graduate students to present current/ongoing research Established a mechanism to investigate the impact of new technologies on graduate student research and learning

16 What s Next? Conduct LibQual+ during November 2010 Communicate survey results with staff and discuss findings and plans for additional analysis Compare LibQual and 2010 survey results and identify improvements and issues reflected in survey findings Review Strategic Plan metrics and update to reflect 2010 survey results. Revise as needed Identify strategies to incorporate survey results into departmental, team and individual 2012 goals Celebrate successes and plan improvements!!

Using LibQUAL+ at Brown University and at the University of Connecticut Libraries

Using LibQUAL+ at Brown University at the University of Connecticut Libraries 1/10/2011 1 Assessment librarians cannot single-hedly implement improvements for users Staff throughout the library must be