Department Annual Report & Discipline Review. Psychology
|
|
- Beatrix Jackson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Department Annual Report & Discipline Review Psychology Disciplines: Psychology, Social Work, Gerontology Program: Gerontology, Cert Document Prepared By: Psychology Department 1
2 Department Information Documentation Current year goals Consistency of process and outcomes across the department Integration of PY-097 in other AFP classes Deeper understanding of the value of supplemental technology in on-ground classes Review and update of CARP documents Integration of Writing as a process and outcomes in PY-201 Goals for net year Develop Research Methods Class and finalize transfer model with GVSU. Review and revise Social Work Curriculum. Establish a Psychology and Social Work pre-major in the new curriculum model. Implement new Advanced Certificate in Gerontology. Internal collaborations and partnerships Led a collaborative effort with Social Science and Criminal Justice to offer a three day symposium on Gun Violence in America. Worked with Honors Program to increase classes within Psychology and student enrollment. Small group facilitator for the Be True to Your School strategic planning event. Training of Math Department faculty on PY 097 curriculum overview and the Wise Choice Process as a new method to help students problem solve for reasonable solutions. Collaboration with The PLACE to provide PY 097 curriculum overview, learning resources, and tetbooks for cross-training of tutors to help PY 097 students. Collaboration with the English Department to integrate Cornell Notes into PY 097 curriculum. Research project with Couseling to assess a measure of persistence (GRiT scores) compared with Fast Track (College Success Program) completion. Led, planned, and participated in the AFP Faculty Learning Day. Presented a session on time management skills and learning strategies on behalf of the Center for Teaching Ecellence. Presented with students at the Honors Program open house Eternal collaborations and partnerships Live forum for MLIVE on gun violence in America. Multiple radio and newspaper interviews. 2
3 GVSU: Working closely with the Psychology Department on the development of the Research Methods class as well as making accommodation for our students to maimize their transferability to GVSU. Family Futures and Holy Cross Children's Services: day dedicated to speakers on a variety of topics related to children and families. Topics include: child maltreatment, foster care and adoption, becoming a CASA (court appointed special advocate), preventing substance abuse, teaching study skills, and keeping families strong. Aquinas: Provided input on the revision of their Psychology Curriculum. Held two Gerontology Program Advisory Board meetings bringing together over a dozen of community agencies to share and receive input on the work of the department. Departmental needs for support from other departments within the college Program accreditation Updates Description of departmental advising plan and outcomes Held one-on-one academic advising for students majoring in Psychology, Social Work, Gerontology, or those currently enrolled in PY-097 in the Fall and Spring Semester. The purpose of these sessions was to meet with a professor in the Psychology Department to Develop a schedule for the following semester. Plan for future classes. Determine what classes are needed to graduate. Decide which classes are best for a student s transfer or career goals. Ask questions about career options in Psychology, Social Work, Counseling, Gerontology, or related fields. The dates for these sessions were: Fall October 16,17,18 Spring March 26 & 27 We had approimately 30 students in the Fall and 20 in the Spring. Departmental professional development activities MyDegreePath: All faculty trained. GRCC Library: Training on writing resources at the college and how these can be utilized by students and faculty. Writing for Psychology: Department reading, review, and application of a document developed by Harvard University for Psychology Majors. 3
4 Other department updates Psychology Department Speaker Series o Can Political Psychology Help Us Know What We're Getting When We Vote? David Winter, Ph.D. Thursday, October 25, 1:00 2:30 o Anger: Just One Letter Away From Danger! Judith Jankowski, Ed.S. Monday, December 3, 1:00 2:30 o Our Connection To Something Bigger: The Archetypes of C.G. Jung. Sandra Portko, Ph.D. Thursday, February 14, 1:00 2:30 o Mental Toughness: The X-Factor in Sport and Life Edmund O Connor, Ph.D. Wednesday, April 3, 1:00 2:30 Implementation and sharing of results in the use of clickers in the classroom. Psi Beta, National Honor Society for Psychology in the Community College. Evaluation Questions 1. Were the department goals for this year successfully met? Please eplain. Yes. Consistency of process and outcomes across the department The assessment project opened the door to conversations with full and adjunct faculty on what and how we teach. It also provided data on core, important learning outcomes. Integration of PY-097 in other AFP classes This is a process. Sandy and Ennis have been working at both the AFP level and with individual departments such as Math and English to help them better understand the content of the class such that they can understand how the PY-097 can assist with their curriculum. Deeper understanding of the value of supplemental technology in on-ground classes The primary focus here was on clickers. We are still evaluating their best use. Review and update of CARP documents Classes have been assigned and are in process. Several faculty needed to be trained on the new model. That has been completed. Integration of Writing as a process and outcomes in PY-201 This is a continual process. We started two years ago with epectations, this year we started educating the faculty, and will continue as needed. 2. Is the Advising Plan working well? What have the outcomes been for student advising? Yes. 4
5 We changed this year to a one-on-one model. We had higher numbers than previous years with much higher conversations with students. Our goal for net year is to continue to advertise and increase the number of students aware of this opportunity. We believe the new pre-major option in the curriculum model will help with this goal. Action Needed Based on the documentation and evaluation in this section, please indicate if action or improvement is needed in the following areas within the department by making your response bold: Eternal Collaborations & Partnerships Yes No Internal Collaborations & Partnerships Yes No Accreditation Yes No Departmental Advising Yes No Documentation Faculty & Staff Faculty Credentials & Certifications- See Appendi A Judy Jankowski should be listed with an Educational Specialist degree. This is a terminal/professional degree in School Psychology. Professional Development Activities A 3-day On Course Workshop I in Baltimore, MD Michigan Developmental Educators Consortium (MDEC) conference Advanced Blackboard workshop Reading of research articles, professional journals, and books related to developmental education and psychology SALT Financial System training Finding Lost Time workshop iclicker Training Online Teaching Certification Classroom Observation Training Introduction to Formation Learning Day Society for Research in Child Development Biennial conference in Seattle, WA in April 5
6 EOL/Release Time Work Only Dr. Sandra Lancaster received Release time in our department. This was as coordinator of our PY-097 class as part of the AFP curriculum. Here individual report was submitted and reported as part of the AFP Program Review. Faculty & Staff Accomplishments/Awards Dr. Kate Byewalter Finalist in Armen Award competition Faculty Development for Upcoming Year Continuation of work in writing within the discipline. Will be offering a session on the development of rubrics and grading writing through the English Department. Nothing additional identified at this time. We will be developing our plan as our needs arise. Evaluation Questions 1. Can course assignments be made and scheduled based on the availability of credentialed faculty? Yes. 2. Is the number of departmental faculty that are certified to teach online and through Academic Service Learning sufficient to achieve the curricular and delivery needs of the department? Yes. 3. Do the number and ratio of Full-time/Adjunct faculty support the goals of the department? No. We are currently stretched to our limit in meeting the needs of our students and the college. While we could use two additional full time tenured track faculty in Psychology, the loss of Dr. Mike Vargo and the college s refusal to fill that one open position is making it difficult to evenly distribute departmental work. 4. Is the professional development faculty and staff are receiving sufficient for them to maintain currency in their field and area(s) of epertise? Yes. 5. Are additional faculty or faculty development resources needed to support the goals of the department over the net four years? No. Action Needed Based on the documentation and evaluation in this section, please indicate if action or improvement is needed in the following areas within the department by making your response bold: Faculty credentialing Yes No Faculty online certification Yes No 6
7 Academic Service Learning Yes No Ratio Fulltime/Adjunct faculty Yes No Faculty professional development Yes No Resources Yes No 7
8 Psychology Documentation Mission & Purpose Mission/Purpose Statement The mission of the Psychology Department is to teach Psychology, Social Work, and Gerontology - providing students with a scientific understanding of the thoughts, behaviors, and emotional processes of an individual, group, or community, so as to apply this learning to their personal lives, their professional practice, or as credits toward a degree or certificate. Target Audiences Psychology, Social Work, and Counseling Majors. Students needing Social Science distribution requirements. Many indirect audiences including criminal justice, health programs, and students seeking a course or two to be admitted to graduate school. Evaluation Questions 1. Is the purpose/mission statement current and relevant? Yes. 2. What are the various audiences for the courses within this discipline? Are the various being served appropriately through the eisting variety of course offerings? Yes. Action Needed Based on the documentation and evaluation in this section, please indicate if action or improvement is needed in the following areas within the department by making your response bold: Mission/Purpose Yes No Target Audience Yes No Documentation Data Course Enrollment by Semester- See Appendi B Trends have remained consistent for most classes similar to the overall trends of the college. Enrollment is down in PY-251. The reason for this is a shift in graduation requirements for education majors at our primary transfer school, GVSU. We have stopped offering PY-263 because of a graduation requirement change for Psychology majors at GVSU. 8
9 PY-097 has increased over the last three years as the college has begun implementing requirements for developmental students. We intentionally decreased some of the offerings of PY-281 to do a complete curriculum redevelopment. Course Success Rates- See Appendi C Success rates tend to correlate to the level of the class. The lower level classes tend to have lower success rates while the upper level classes have higher rates. PY-281 being the eception. To increase the success rate in PY-201 the department implemented a student success metacurriculum in the course. We started this year a complete redevelopment of the PY-281 curriculum intended at increasing student success. There is a disparity between racial minorities across all classes. While we have noted this difference, we have yet to consider any targeted interventions. We believe the student success curriculum is applicable to all students and we try to work closely with all resources at the college which provide services to these specific populations. Four-Year Course Success Rates- See Appendi D These data show similar success rate information as course success rates. Evaluation Questions 1. Are all courses within the discipline viable based on the enrollment data (# of students who take the course in the academic year)? 2. Are students passing courses at the appropriate rates? If not, which courses are of concern? Are the Course Success Rates the same for the various sub-group populations? If not, where are the areas of concern? 3. Do the grade distributions seem appropriate for each course? If not, which courses are of concern? Action Needed Based on the documentation and evaluation in this section, please indicate if action or improvement is needed in the following areas within the department by making your response bold: Course enrollment Yes No Course Success Rates Yes No Course grade distributions Yes No Curriculum 9
10 Documentation Department/Discipline Curriculum History (last eight years) Re-development and full integration of PY-097 into the AFP Curriculum model. Removal of PY-263 from the course offerings based on changes at GVSU. Re-development of PY-281 based on poor student success. Development of Honors Courses (PY-201, PY-232, PY-233) Advisory Board Contributions Courses Approved for Online Delivery- See Appendi E We will be developing PY-251 as an online course net year. Honors Courses- See Appendi E Study Away Courses- See Appendi E Course Equivalencies with Transfer Institutions- See Transfer Equivalency Spreadsheet All psychology courses other than PY-097 transfer as their equivalent course to our primary transfer college (GVSU) and all other area colleges if they have the equivalent course. We do not offer a course if it doesn t transfer to GVSU. Evaluation Questions 1. To what etent is the program curriculum aligned with eternal professional standards (Industry, State, or National)? Are the current courses within the discipline appropriately and sufficiently addressing eternal standards? Please eplain. 2. To what etent is the curriculum (course offerings) aligned with the first two years of transfer institutions? [Transfer Institution Curriculum Comparison] 3. Do the program (discipline) outcomes reflect the demonstrable skills, knowledge, and attitudes epected of students by the end of the program? Are the Program Student Learning outcomes clearly stated and measurable? If not, what changes are suggested? 4. Are the current course offerings sufficient in terms of breadth and depth? If not, what courses should be added and or eliminated? [Curriculum Mapping] 5. Are the honors and study away offerings sufficient for the program? 6. Is eperiential learning, including internships and academic service learning, systematically embedded into the courses? Are the current eperiential learning opportunities sufficient? Please eplain. 7. Does the curriculum prepare students for a constantly changing employment environment, and prepare students to epect and manage change? Please eplain. 10
11 8. Is the curriculum developed in such a way that it allows students to continue their education once they are finished with their subsequent coursework? Please eplain. 9. Are the online offerings (courses & number of sections) sufficient to meet student needs? Action Needed Based on the documentation and evaluation in this section, please indicate if action or improvement is needed in the following areas within the department by making your response bold: Curriculum alignment with eternal professional standards Yes No Transfer alignment Yes No Program Outcomes Yes No Program Learning Outcomes Yes No Course offerings Yes No General Education Yes No Honors Program Yes No Study Away Program Yes No Internship Yes No Academic Service Learning Yes No Course sequencing Yes No Pre-requisites Yes No Preparing students for change Yes No Online Course Offerings Yes No Documentation Assessment of Student Learning Program Learning Outcome(s) assessed this year This year the department focused on critical thinking and scientific method. Measures of Student Learning An end-of-semester eam was given in every section of PY-201 in the last two weeks of the semester. The specific questions are attached. Initial Data and Findings Overall the results were positive, but there was a range of success from 75% to 45% by professor. Full time professors demonstrated higher success rate of students versus adjunct. We have asked for student grades by professor to assure a correlation between assessment data and student grades. Curricular or Pedagogical Changes Implemented 11
12 We have presented the data to all faculty, full and part time, and considered the results. One area identified for improvement was in the implementation of the assessment tool itself. Adjunct had questions on what could and couldn t be done. That has been clarified. Other than information about success, no additional curricular changes are planned at this time. Data and Findings (post improvement/change) Evaluation 1. What are your greatest needs for support in order to continue to move forward with your assessment work? Action Needed Based on the documentation and evaluation in this section, please indicate if action or improvement is needed in the following areas within the department by making your response bold: Identifying Measures for each Program Learning Outcome Yes No Reporting out longitudinal data in a meaningful format Yes No Creating meaningful improvement projects Yes No Documentation Preparing for the future Trends in the Field A greater and eplicit emphasis on the teaching of the scientific measurement. A long term consideration will be the implementation of SPSS (Statistical software) into relevant lasses in the department. Plans for Course Development/Revision/Elimination Over the Net Four Years Revision of PY-281 (statistics) and development of a Research Methods class. Evaluation Questions 1. Are the resources sufficient to meet identified needs and goals for the net four years? Please eplain. 2. Are the facilities and equipment adequate to facilitate teaching and learning? Please eplain. Action Needed 12
13 Based on the documentation and evaluation in this section, please indicate if action or improvement is needed in the following areas within the department by making your response bold: Securing resources for course development/administration Yes No Facilities/equipment upgrades Yes No Other: Other: Other: Other: Additional Tasks/Work Develop the Course Review schedule for the net four years (beginning with net year) Identify which courses from the department will be developed in online or hybrid format over the net four years. Indicate the highest priorities for online and hybrid development and the academic year in which the course will be developed. Review all publications, website, catalog to ensure consistency of information Complete Follow-Up Action Checklist 13
14 Social Work Documentation Mission & Purpose Mission/Purpose Statement The mission of the Psychology Department is to teach Psychology, Social Work, and Gerontology - providing students with a scientific understanding of the thoughts, behaviors, and emotional processes of an individual, group, or community, so as to apply this learning to their personal lives, their professional practice, or as credits toward a degree or certificate. Target Audiences Social Work majors Evaluation Questions 1. Is the purpose/mission statement current and relevant? 2. What are the various audiences for the courses within this discipline? Are the various being served appropriately through the eisting variety of course offerings? Action Needed Based on the documentation and evaluation in this section, please indicate if action or improvement is needed in the following areas within the department by making your response bold: Mission/Purpose Yes No Target Audience Yes No Data Documentation (Curriculum Office will provide all data) Course Enrollment by Semester- See Appendi B Enrollment trends are difficult to etrapolate from these data. In we did a complete revamping of the curriculum eliminating and combining some classes. We do know that numbers are generally down. Partly because we were conservative in our offering of these new classes given the confusion of the old grouping of classes. We are slowly adding classes, the first one stating net fall to determine need. Course Success Rates- See Appendi C 14
15 The same information as above applies to success rate. Four-Year Course Success Trends- See Appendi D Success rates are typical of classes in the department, but we don t have much trend data for the reasons stated above. Evaluation Questions 1. Are all courses within the discipline viable based on the enrollment data (# of students who take the course in the academic year)? 2. Are students passing courses at the appropriate rates? If not, which courses are of concern? Are the Course Success Rates the same for the various sub-group populations? If not, where are the areas of concern? 3. Do the grade distributions seem appropriate for each course? If not, which courses are of concern? Action Needed Based on the documentation and evaluation in this section, please indicate if action or improvement is needed in the following areas within the department by making your response bold: Course enrollment Yes No Course Success Rates Yes No Course grade distributions Yes No Documentation Curriculum Department/Discipline Curriculum History (last eight years) This entire program was developed with very little department input many years ago. In the department did a complete evaluation of the classes. This resulted in the elimination of duplicate classes that did not transfer, reduction in contact hours in classes to align with the standards of our transfer institutions, and an overall reduction in the classes offered. The purpose of these changes were to assure students were not paying and taking classes at GRCC that had no value at transfer universities. Advisory Board Contributions Courses Approved for Online Delivery- See Appendi E Honors Courses- See Appendi E 15
16 Study Away Courses- See Appendi E Course Equivalencies with Transfer Institutions- See Transfer Equivalency Spreadsheet All classes transfer as their equivalent class at our primary transfer institutions. Evaluation Questions 1. To what etent is the program curriculum aligned with eternal professional standards (Industry, State, or National)? Are the current courses within the discipline appropriately and sufficiently addressing eternal standards? Please eplain. 2. To what etent is the curriculum (course offerings) aligned with the first two years of transfer institutions? [Transfer Institution Curriculum Comparison] 3. Do the program (discipline) outcomes reflect the demonstrable skills, knowledge, and attitudes epected of students by the end of the program? Are the Program Student Learning outcomes clearly stated and measurable? If not, what changes are suggested? 4. Are the current course offerings sufficient in terms of breadth and depth? If not, what courses should be added and or eliminated? [Curriculum Mapping] 5. Are the honors and study away offerings sufficient for the program? 6. Is eperiential learning, including internships and academic service learning, systematically embedded into the courses? Are the current eperiential learning opportunities sufficient? Please eplain. 7. Does the curriculum prepare students for a constantly changing employment environment, and prepare students to epect and manage change? Please eplain. 8. Is the curriculum developed in such a way that it allows students to continue their education once they are finished with their subsequent coursework? Please eplain. 9. Are the online offerings (courses & number of sections) sufficient to meet student needs? Action Needed Based on the documentation and evaluation in this section, please indicate if action or improvement is needed in the following areas within the department by making your response bold: Curriculum alignment with eternal professional standards Yes No Transfer alignment Yes No Program Outcomes Yes No Program Learning Outcomes Yes No Course offerings Yes No General Education Yes No Honors Program Yes No 16
17 Study Away Program Yes No Internship Yes No Academic Service Learning Yes No Course sequencing Yes No Pre-requisites Yes No Preparing students for change Yes No Online Course Offerings Yes No Documentation Assessment of Student Learning Program Learning Outcome(s) assessed this year Social Work and Psychology are using the same student learning outcomes of knowledge of scientific methods and critical thinking. These are basic skills for both programs. Measures of Student Learning See Psychology Initial Data and Findings See Psychology Curricular or Pedagogical Changes Implemented See Psychology Data and Findings (post improvement/change) See Psychology Evaluation 1. What are your greatest needs for support in order to continue to move forward with your assessment work? Action Needed Based on the documentation and evaluation in this section, please indicate if action or improvement is needed in the following areas within the department by making your response bold: Identifying Measures for each Program Learning Outcome Yes No 17
18 Reporting out longitudinal data in a meaningful format Yes No Creating meaningful improvement projects Yes No Documentation Preparing for the future Trends in the Field Social Work is a growing field and one of great interest to our students. With changes in insurance policies and an aging population, there will continue to be employment opportunities in this field. It is also the degree path that appears to have the most success with our student population. Plans for Course Development/Revision/Elimination Over the Net Four Years It is time to revisit the program revisions made a few years ago. In a gathering of the Social Work adjunct, it was suggested we could easily add one more class to our offerings. We ll be working on this in the net year both internally and in concert with our transfer schools. Because the original set of classes was developed without consideration of a comprehensive transfer curriculum, we may also need to renumber our eisting classes to make the number sequence commensurate with the course content. Evaluation Questions 1. Are the resources sufficient to meet identified needs and goals for the net four years? Please eplain. Possibly not. Since we have no full time Social Work faculty, we may need to pay an adjunct to assist in this curriculum development. 2. Are the facilities and equipment adequate to facilitate teaching and learning? Please eplain. Action Needed Based on the documentation and evaluation in this section, please indicate if action or improvement is needed in the following areas within the department by making your response bold: Securing resources for course development/administration Yes No Facilities/equipment upgrades Yes No Other: 18
19 Other: Other: Other: Additional Tasks/Work Develop the Course Review schedule for the net four years (beginning with net year) Identify which courses from the department will be developed in online or hybrid format over the net four years. Indicate the highest priorities for online and hybrid development and the academic year in which the course will be developed. Review all publications, website, catalog to ensure consistency of information Complete Follow-Up Action Checklist Gerontology, CERT Documentation Mission & Purpose Mission/Purpose Statement Gerontology is the study of the field of aging, and focuses on a basic understanding of processes, programs, and policies related to aging; these include the process of aging, and particularly the biological, behavioral and social aspects of later life. Target Audiences Students who want to augment an eisting degree providing them with a credential to work with individuals in late adulthood. Program Admissions Requirements Students must have a degree or being pursuing one in parallel to this advanced certificate. This degree is not intended as a stand alone certificate. Evaluation Questions 1. Is the purpose/mission statement current and relevant? 2. Has the target audience for the program been identified? Who is the target audience for this program? Is the program attracting and appropriately serving the target audience? 19
20 3. If there are admissions criteria for the program, are they appropriate and do they facilitate program and student success? If there are Action Needed Based on the documentation and evaluation in this section, please indicate if action or improvement is needed in the following areas within the department by making your response bold: Mission/Purpose Yes No Target Audience Yes No Program Admissions Yes No Documentation New Student Enrollment Program Data The data only shows 2 new enrollees later year, 2 in 2011, and 3 in Our assumption for this is under the old curriculum model, students could not have two program codes. Since they were earning this certificate in conjunction to an Associated Degree, their Gerontology code would not be indicated. We hope under the new model we will get more accurate data on individual seeking this certificate. Total Student Enrollment Total students enrolled is also low. Again, we assume the same issue as new student enrollment. Student Progress One trend we ve noticed is more students in the program are transferring. This is consistent with our changes in making this an Advanced Certificate and not a stand alone degree. Student Participation in Nontraditional Fields N/A- Enrollment too low for this analysis Credential, Certificate, or Degree Attainment Again, given how this degree was tracked in the past, we don t have good data to understand how well our students are progressing toward the completion of their certificate. 20
21 Student Completion in Nontraditional Fields N/A- Enrollment too low for this analysis Student Placement N/A- Enrollment too low for this analysis Student Retention and Transfer N/A- Enrollment too low for this analysis Technical Skills Attainment N/A- Enrollment too low for this analysis Course enrollment by semester Other than GO-203, which had one high year, numbers have remained consistent. GO-283 is up this last year suggesting more students have completed the program. Again, since they may also be enrolled in another Associate Degree program, the obtainment of their certificate may not be consistent with the completion of the requirements. Course Success Rates (broken down by race/ethnicity, gender, age) Success rates in the GO classes tend to be higher than average and there s little difference between defined populations. Four-Year Course Success Trends Success rate tend to stay consistent over time. Evaluation Questions 1. Is the program consistently attracting new students? 2. Is the enrollment trend meeting established targets, ensuring program viability? If targets for enrollment have not been established, what should they be? 3. Do students appear to be progressing through the program well? 4. To what etent are the targets for core program indicators (Student Participation in Nontraditional fields, Student Retention & Transfer, Credential, Certificate, Degree Attainment, Student Completion in non-traditional fields, Student Placement, Technical Skills Attainment) being met? Are the various sub-populations meeting the targets at the same rate? 21
22 5. Is the yearly ratio of the number of students enrolled to the number of graduates appropriate given program goals? 6. Are students obtaining employment upon graduation at satisfactory rates? 7. What does the course enrollment by semester data tell you? 8. Are students passing courses at the appropriate rates? If not, which courses are of concern? Are the Course Success Rates the same for the various sub-group populations? If not, where are the areas of concern? 9. Do the grade distributions seem appropriate for each course? If not, which courses are of concern? Action Needed Based on the documentation and evaluation in this section, please indicate if action or improvement is needed in the following areas within the department by making your response bold: New Student Enrollment Yes No Total Student Enrollment Yes No Student Progress Yes No Student Participation in Nontraditional Fields Yes No Credential, Certificate, or Degree Attainment Yes No Student Completion in Nontraditional Fields Yes No Student Placement Yes No Student Retention and Transfer Yes No Technical Skills Attainment Yes No Course enrollment by semester Yes No Course Success Rates Yes No Course grade distributions Yes No Documentation Curriculum Program Curriculum History (last eight years) While there has been little change in the overall curriculum, the biggest change occurred at the end of this school year were we changed the degree from a stand alone certificate to an Advanced Certificate under the college s new curriculum model. In this new configuration, students cannot earn this degree alone but must obtain the degree in parallel or after earning another degree. The reason for this change is to match student practices and the desire of the job market. 22
23 Advisory Board Contributions Approval the change from a stand-alone certificate to an Advanced Certificate. Courses Approved for Online Delivery- See Appendi E Honors Courses- See Appendi E Study Away Courses- See Appendi E Course Equivalencies with Transfer Institutions- See Transfer Institution Spreadsheet While a few classes transfer, this is intended as a terminal degree, not part of a transfer curriculum. Program/Course Equivalencies with K-12 Institutions Evaluation Questions 1. Is the program structured appropriately given the target student population and current student population (traditional, transfer, and/or adult learners)? Please eplain. 2. To what etent is the program curriculum aligned with eternal professional standards (Industry, State, or National)? Are the current courses within the program or discipline appropriately and sufficiently addressing eternal standards? Please eplain. 3. Does the program design and structure reflect eternal standards and best practices? Please eplain. 4. To what etent is the curriculum aligned with the first two years of transfer institutions? [Transfer Institution Curriculum Comparison] 5. To what etent is the curriculum aligned with the coursework at K-12 institutions? 6. Do the program outcomes reflect the demonstrable skills, knowledge, and attitudes epected of students by the end of the program? Are the Program Student Learning outcomes clearly stated and measurable? If not, what changes are suggested? 7. Are all four of the ILOs and associated competencies integrated into the program? Do students have the opportunity to build the knowledge, skills, and attitudes associated with the ILOs throughout the program? [Curriculum Mapping] 8. Are the current course offerings sufficient in terms of breadth and depth? If not, what courses should be added and or eliminated? [Curriculum Mapping] 9. Have general education courses been purposefully integrated into the program? Are the general education courses within the program appropriate and sufficient to support the learning associated with the Institutional and Program Learning Outcomes? [Curriculum Mapping] 10. Are the honors and study away offering sufficient for the program? 23
24 11. Do the course sequences require increasing application of higher-order thinking skills as students progress through the program? Is the course sequence aligned in such a way that the Program Student Learning outcomes are mastered by the end of the program? 12. Is eperiential learning, including internships and academic service learning, systematically embedded into the courses? Are the current eperiential learning opportunities sufficient? Please eplain. 13. Does the curriculum prepare students for a constantly changing employment environment, and prepare students to epect and manage change? Please eplain. 14. Is the curriculum developed in such a way that it allows students to continue their education once they are finished with this program? Please eplain. 15. Are the online offerings (courses & number of sections) sufficient to meet student and programmatic needs? Action Needed Based on the documentation and evaluation in this section, please indicate if action or improvement is needed in the following areas within the department by making your response bold: Program structure Yes No Curriculum alignment with eternal professional standards Yes No Transfer alignment Yes No Curriculum Alignment K-12 Yes No Program Outcomes Yes No Program Learning Outcomes Yes No Course offerings Yes No General Education Yes No Honors Program Yes No Study Away Program Yes No Internship Yes No Academic Service Learning Yes No Course sequencing Yes No Pre-requisites Yes No Preparing students for change Yes No Online Offerings (courses & programs) Yes No Documentation Assessment of Student Learning Program Learning Outcome(s) assessed this year 24
25 1. Apply aging-related technical knowledge gained in coursework and other learning eperiences to an on-site field placement. 2. Demonstrate older adult helping skills which build on previous field placement and learning eperiences and reflect his/her educational goals. 3. Define components of the helping process and discuss how the process is applied in a real life situation (i.e. their field placement agency). Measures of Student Learning Third party assessment in the form of Student Practicum Evaluation feedback provided by Placement Site Supervisors upon completion of GO 283 Gerontology Practicum 2: Question 1: Student is able to apply the technical knowledge gained in coursework and other learning eperiences to this on-site field placement. Question 3: Student demonstrates helping skills which build on previous field placement and learning eperiences and reflects his/her educational goals. Question 5: Student is able to define components of the helping process and discuss how the process is applied in the field placement agency. Initial Data and Findings Learning Outcome 1: Winter 2013 average student rating = 94% (low = 70%, high = 100%) Learning Outcome 2: Winter 2013 average student rating = 95% (low = 80%, high = 100%) Learning Outcome 3: Winter 2013 average student rating = 95% (low = 75%, high = 100%) Curricular or Pedagogical Changes Implemented None Data and Findings (post improvement/change) Evaluation 2. Are licensure/certification eam pass rates are above national or state averages (if applicable)? If not, please eplain what needs to be done to improve. 3. What are your greatest needs for support in order to continue to move forward with your assessment work? Action Needed Based on the documentation and evaluation in this section, please indicate if action or improvement is needed in the following areas within the department by making your response bold: 25
26 Identifying Measures for each Program Learning Outcome Yes No Reporting out longitudinal data in a meaningful format Yes No Creating meaningful improvement projects Yes No Preparing for the future Documentation Job and Wage forecasts With an aging population, it is assumed these jobs will increase in demand. What is not known is if the industry will adopt any real standards for the hiring of such personal thus giving credence to this certificate. Environmental Scanning/Trends PROE Student Survey Results NA- No Survey Results for this program Advisory Board Survey Results NA- No Survey Results for this program Program Planning Other than the shift in the certificate, there is no planned changes over the net four years. Evaluation Questions 1. Do the job projections and wages data suggest that this program will be viable over the net four years? 2. Is the number of graduates aligned with the market need (job forecasts/transfer institutions)? 3. What did you learn from the PROE Student Survey results? Will you take any actions with the program as a result of what you have learned? 4. What did you learn from the Advisory Board Survey results? Will you take any actions with the program as a result of what you have learned? 5. Are the resources sufficient to meet identified needs and goals for the net four years? Please eplain. 6. Are the facilities and equipment adequate to facilitate teaching and learning? Please eplain. 26
27 Action Needed Based on the documentation and evaluation in this section, please indicate if action or improvement is needed in the following areas within the department by making your response bold: Program Planning Yes No Securing resources for course development/administration Yes No Facilities/equipment upgrades Yes No Other: Yes No Other: Yes No Other: Yes No Other: Yes No Additional Tasks/Work Develop the Course Review schedule for the net four years (beginning with net year) Identify which courses from the department will be developed in online or hybrid format over the net four years. Indicate the highest priorities for online and hybrid development and the academic year in which the course will be developed. Review all publications, website, catalog to ensure consistency of information Complete Follow-Up Action Checklist 27
28 Appendi A Faculty Credentials & Certifications Psychology Department Faculty Credentials Last Name First Name Employee Group Title Hi Educ Lv Barth Keith Adjunct Faculty/Adjunct Master's Brown Mary Adjunct Faculty/Adjunct Master's Byers Laura Adjunct Faculty/Adjunct Doctorate Curro Theodore Adjunct Faculty/Adjunct Master's Dyk Barbara Adjunct Faculty/Adjunct Master's Faber Michael Adjunct Faculty/Adjunct Master's Firlan Urminda Adjunct Faculty/Adjunct Doctorate Forbes Nancy Adjunct Faculty/Adjunct Master's Griffin Gabriel Adjunct Faculty/Adjunct Master's Harter Andrew Adjunct Faculty/Adjunct Master's Henders William Adjunct Faculty/Adjunct Master's Houck Marc Adjunct Faculty/Adjunct MD,DDS,JD Kieliszewski Jeffery Adjunct Faculty/Adjunct Doctorate Kivinen Michael Adjunct Faculty/Adjunct Master's Kleiman Ian Adjunct Faculty/Adjunct Master's Lee Joseph Adjunct Faculty/Adjunct Master's Mullen Patricia Adjunct Faculty/Adjunct Master's Perko Antonina Adjunct Faculty/Adjunct Master's Potvin Denise Adjunct Faculty/Adjunct Master's Prior Kerry Adjunct Faculty/Adjunct Master's Shumaker Gayle Adjunct Faculty/Adjunct Master's Termeer Paula Adjunct Faculty/Adjunct Master's Vandevelde Margaret Adjunct Faculty/Adjunct Master's Walenjus Teresa Adjunct Faculty/Adjunct Master's Wallsteadt Susan Adjunct Faculty/Adjunct Master's White Michaelene Adjunct Faculty/Adjunct Master's Byerwalter Mary Faculty Professor Doctorate Conner Frank Faculty Professor Doctorate Jankowski Judith Faculty Professor Master's Lancaster Sandra Faculty Assistant Professor Doctorate Rubin Sophie Faculty Assistant Professor Doctorate Young Ennis Faculty Assistant Professor Master's 28
29 Psychology Department Faculty with Academic Service Learning Credential First Name Kate Frank Urminda Judith Whitney Sherry Michael Last Name Byerwalter Conner Firlan Jankowski Johnson Rhoden Vargo Psychology Department Faculty certified to do online/hybrid teaching First Name Last Name Frank Conner Nancy Forbes Judy Jankowski Jennifer Sobie Terry Stockton Michael Vargo Kate Byerwalter Sherri Rhoden Paula Triplett Cedric Williams Susan Wallsteadt Keith Barth Sophie Rubin Michaelene White Ennis Young Sandra Lancaster Mindy Firlan 29
30 Christina Barland Edmondson 30
31 Appendi B- Course Enrollment by Semester Course Enrollment Data Summary Course Fall Winter 2009 Summer 2009 Total Fall 2009 Winter 2010 Summer 2010 Total PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY GO GO GO GO GO GO SW SW SW Fall 2010 Winter 2011 Summer 2011 Total Fall 2011 Winter 2012 Summer 2012 Total 31
32 PY 097 Appendi C - Course Success Rates (Success = grades A to C-) Race/ Ethnicity Age Course Success Rates AtD categories Course success rates (A-C divided by all grades) by subcategories: Race/Ethnicity, Gender, Fulltime/Part-time, and Pell Grant recipient/no Pell. White non- Hispanic Black non- Hispanic Hispanic Asian / Pacific Islander Native American Nonresident Alien No response or other Number Course Total Percent Successful Course 62% 40% 68% 67% 67% NA 59% 52% Less than or older Total Number Course Percent Successful Course 58% 48% 47% 52% Gender Female Male Total Number Course Percent Successful Course 61% 43% 52% Pell Pell No Pell Total Number Course Percent Successful Course 51% 57% 52% 32
33 PY 201 Race/ Ethnicity White non-hispanic Black non- Hispanic Hispanic Asian / Pacific Islander Native American Nonresident Alien No response or other Number Course 1, ,529 Percent Successful Course Total ,137 79% 51% 69% 84% 50% 67% 73% 74% Age Less than or older Total Number Course ,529 Percent Successful Course ,137 76% 70% 76% 74% Gender Female Male Total Number Course 1, ,529 Percent Successful Course ,137 77% 70% 74% Pell Pell No Pell Total Number Course ,529 Percent Successful Course ,137 69% 79% 74% 33
34 PY 260 Race/ Ethnicity White non-hispanic Black non- Hispanic Hispanic Asian / Pacific Islander Native American Nonresident Alien No response or other Number Course Percent Successful Course Age Less than Total 78% 50% 50% n/a 100% 100% 100% 76% 25 or older Total Number Course Percent Successful Course % 74% 73% 76% Gender Female Male Total Number Course Percent Successful Course % 58% 76% Pell Pell No Pell Total Number Course Percent Successful Course % 79% 76% 34
35 PY 281 Race/ Ethnicity White non-hispanic Black non- Hispanic Hispanic Asian / Pacific Islander Native American Nonresident Alien No response or other Number Course Percent Successful Course Age Less than Total 74% 50% 33% n/a 100% n/a 100% 71% 25 or older Total Number Course Percent Successful Course % 71% 64% 71% Gender Female Male Total Number Course Percent Successful Course % 88% 71% Pell Pell No Pell Total Number Course Percent Successful Course % 90% 71% 35
36 SW 102 Race/ Ethnicity Number Course Number Successful Course Percent Successful Course White non-hispanic Black non- Hispanic Age Less than Number Course Number Successful Course Percent Successful Course Hispanic Asian / Pacific Islander Native American Nonresident Alien No response or other Tota l 95% 78% 50% n/a 67% n/a n/a 86% 25 or older Total % 100% 76% 86% Gender Female Male Total Number Course Number Successful Course Percent Successful Course % 83% 86% Pell Pell No Pell Total Number Course Number Successful Course Percent Successful Course % 94% 86% 36
37 SW 103 Race/ Ethnicity White non- Hispanic Black non- Hispanic Hispanic Asian / Pacific Islander Native American Nonresident Alien No response or other Number Course Percent Successful Course Total 88% 75% 50% n/a n/a n/a n/a 78% Age Less than or older Total Number Course Percent Successful Course % 67% 77% 78% Gender Female Male Total Number Course Percent Successful Course % 75% 78% Pell Pell No Pell Total Number Course Percent Successful Course % 100% 78% 37
38 GO 261 Race/ Ethnicity White non- Hispanic Black non-hispanic Hispanic Asian / Pacific Islander Native American Nonresident Alien No response or other Number Course Percent Successful Course 84% 83% 100% 100% n/a n/a n/a 86% Total Age Less than or older Number Course Total Percent Successful Course 67% 67% 96% 86% Gender Female Male Total Number Course Percent Successful Course 89% 75% 86% Pell Pell No Pell Total Number Course Percent Successful Course 80% 100% 86% 38
39 GO 262 Race/ Ethnicity Age White non- Hispanic Black non- Hispanic Hispanic Asian / Pacific Islander Native American Nonresident Alien No response or other Number Course Percent Successful Course Total 86% 100% 100% n/a n/a n/a 0% 86% Less than or older Total Number Course Percent Successful Course % 67% 92% 86% Gender Female Male Total Number Course Percent Successful Course % 50% 86% Pell Pell No Pell Total Number Course Percent Successful Course % 100% 86% 39
40 GO 282 Race/ Ethnicity White non- Hispanic Black non- Hispanic Hispanic Asian / Pacific Islander Native American Nonresident Alien No response or other Number Course Percent Successful Course Total 100% 100% n/a n/a n/a 100% n/a 100% Age Less than or older Total Number Course Percent Successful Course n/a 100% 100% 100% Gender Female Male Total Number Course Percent Successful Course % 100% 100% Pell Pell No Pell Total Number Course Percent Successful Course % 100% 100% 40
B. Outcome Reporting Include the following information for each outcome assessed this year:
Kansas State University Undergraduate Assessment of Student Learning Report Report for Academic Year: - (Edited for Division of Student Life) A. Program Information Student Life Department: Academic and
More informationJohn Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY ASSESSMENT REPORT: SPRING Undergraduate Public Administration Major
John Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY ASSESSMENT REPORT: SPRING 203 Undergraduate Public Administration Major Maria J. D'Agostino 06.30.203 ANNUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT FALL 20 SPRING 202 2 I. ASSESSMENT
More informationFile Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10
Success - Key Measures Graduation Rate: 4-, 5-, and 6-Year 9. First-time, full-time entering, degree-seeking, students enrolled in a minimum of 12 SCH their first fall semester who have graduated from
More informationShelters Elementary School
Shelters Elementary School August 2, 24 Dear Parents and Community Members: We are pleased to present you with the (AER) which provides key information on the 23-24 educational progress for the Shelters
More informationRaw Data Files Instructions
Raw Data Files Instructions Colleges will report the above information for students in the Main Cohort for each of the reporting timeframes and the system will calculate the sub cohorts and metrics based
More informationThe following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-
1. Adoption of Wright State 2016 Campus Completion Plan The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16- WHEREAS, Section 3345.81 of the Ohio Revised Code requires
More informationNational Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary
National Survey of Student Engagement Spring 2010 University of Kansas Executive Summary Overview One thousand six hundred and twenty-one (1,621) students from the University of Kansas completed the web-based
More informationDepartment Annual Report Non-Perkins Programs Mathematics Document Prepared By: John Dersch
Department Annual Report Non-Perkins Programs 2012-2013 Mathematics Document Prepared By: John Dersch KD ISIS 3/26/2013 Annual Report 1 Department Information Current year goals Our goals for this year
More informationNew Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering
New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering AND IN ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING Program Review Last Update: Nov. 23, 2005 MISSION STATEMENTS DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ELECTRICAL
More informationFrank Phillips College. Accountability Report
Frank Phillips College Accountability Report January 2016 Accountability System, January 2016 1 of 22 Participation - Key Measures Enrollment 1. Fall Headcount (Unduplicated) Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Fall 2015
More informationACADEMIC ALIGNMENT. Ongoing - Revised
ACADEMIC ALIGNMENT Sandra Andrews December 2012 Erin Busscher, John Dersch, William Faber, Lorraine Fortuna, Laurie Foster, Wilfred Gooch, Fiona Hert, Diane Patrick, Paula Sullivan and Vince James Part
More informationStudent Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation
Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist and Bethany L. McCaffrey, Ph.D., Interim Director of Research and Evaluation Evaluation
More informationBest Colleges Main Survey
Best Colleges Main Survey Date submitted 5/12/216 18::56 Introduction page 1 / 146 BEST COLLEGES Data Collection U.S. News has begun collecting data for the 217 edition of Best Colleges. The U.S. News
More informationGoal #1 Promote Excellence and Expand Current Graduate and Undergraduate Programs within CHHS
Goal #1 Promote Excellence and Expand Current Graduate and Undergraduate Programs within CHHS Objectives Actions Outcome Responsibility Objective 1 Develop innovative alternative methodologies for educational
More informationNational Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report
The College Student Report This is a facsimile of the NSSE survey (available at nsse.iub.edu/links/surveys). The survey itself is administered online. 1. During the current school year, about how often
More informationIowa School District Profiles. Le Mars
Iowa School District Profiles Overview This profile describes enrollment trends, student performance, income levels, population, and other characteristics of the public school district. The report utilizes
More informationUniversity of Arizona
Annual Report Submission View Questionnaire (Edit) University of Arizona Annual Report Submission for the year 2009. Report has been submitted 1 times. Report was last submitted on 11/30/2009 7:12:09 PM.
More informationhttps://secure.aacte.org/apps/peds/print_all_forms.php?view=report&prin...
1 of 35 4/25/2012 9:56 AM A» 2011 PEDS» Institutional Data inst id: 3510 Institutional Data A_1 Institutional Information This information will be used in all official references to your institution. Institution
More informationFacts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning
Facts and Figures 2008-2009 Office of Institutional Research and Planning Office of Institutional Research Fall 2009 Facts at a Glance Credit Headcount Enrollments Headcount Ethnicity Headcount Percent
More informationState Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2
State Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2 Submitted by: Dr. JoAnn Simser State Director for Career and Technical Education Minnesota State Colleges and Universities St. Paul, Minnesota
More informationACCREDITATION STANDARDS
ACCREDITATION STANDARDS Description of the Profession Interpretation is the art and science of receiving a message from one language and rendering it into another. It involves the appropriate transfer
More informationPort Graham El/High. Report Card for
School: District: Kenai Peninsula Grades: K - 12 School Enrollment: 20 Title I School? No Title 1 Program: Accreditation: Report Card for 2008-2009 A Title 1 school receives federal money in support low-achieving
More informationProgram Information on the Graduate Certificate in Alcohol and Drug Abuse Studies (CADAS)
Program Information on the Graduate Certificate in Alcohol and Drug Abuse Studies (CADAS) This program is designed for students who have either: 1) completed a Master s degree or higher qualification from
More informationWorld s Best Workforce Plan
2017-18 World s Best Workforce Plan District or Charter Name: PiM Arts High School, 4110-07 Contact Person Name and Position Matt McFarlane, Executive Director In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section
More informationData Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)
Institutional Research and Assessment Data Glossary This document is a collection of terms and variable definitions commonly used in the universities reports. The definitions were compiled from various
More informationEDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT By 2030, at least 60 percent of Texans ages 25 to 34 will have a postsecondary credential or degree. Target: Increase the percent of Texans ages 25 to 34 with a postsecondary credential.
More informationCONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS
CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS No. 18 (replaces IB 2008-21) April 2012 In 2008, the State Education Department (SED) issued a guidance document to the field regarding the
More informationMassachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results
Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results Principal Investigator: Thomas G. Blomberg Dean and Sheldon L. Messinger Professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice Prepared by: George Pesta
More informationThe Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016
The Condition of College and Career Readiness This report looks at the progress of the 16 ACT -tested graduating class relative to college and career readiness. This year s report shows that 64% of students
More informationLos Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page
Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan Signature Page Los Angeles Community College Los Angeles City College President, Board of Trustees Date District Chancellor: College President: Academic Senate
More informationPROGRAM REVIEW REPORT EXTERNAL REVIEWER
PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT EXTERNAL REVIEWER MASTER OF PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SACRAMENTO NOVEMBER, 2012 Submitted by Michelle
More informationABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs
ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs Mapped to 2008 NSSE Survey Questions First Edition, June 2008 Introduction and Rationale for Using NSSE in ABET Accreditation One of the most common
More informationCooper Upper Elementary School
LIVONIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS http://cooper.livoniapublicschools.org 215-216 Annual Education Report BOARD OF EDUCATION 215-16 Colleen Burton, President Dianne Laura, Vice President Tammy Bonifield, Secretary
More informationREADY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE
READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE Michal Kurlaender University of California, Davis Policy Analysis for California Education March 16, 2012 This research
More informationDivision of Student Affairs Annual Report. Office of Multicultural Affairs
Department Mission/Vision Statement Division of Student Affairs 2009-2010 Annual Report Office of Multicultural Affairs The Office of Multicultural Affairs provides comprehensive academic, personal, social,
More informationStrategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing
for Retaining Women Workbook An NCWIT Extension Services for Undergraduate Programs Resource Go to /work.extension.html or contact us at es@ncwit.org for more information. 303.735.6671 info@ncwit.org Strategic
More informationUndergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice
Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice A Report Prepared for The Professional Educator Standards Board Prepared by: Ana M. Elfers Margaret L. Plecki Elise St. John Rebecca Wedel University
More informationNATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) 2008 H. Craig Petersen Director, Analysis, Assessment, and Accreditation Utah State University Logan, Utah AUGUST, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary...1
More informationSTUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT
STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT PROGRAM: Sociology SUBMITTED BY: Janine DeWitt DATE: August 2016 BRIEFLY DESCRIBE WHERE AND HOW ARE DATA AND DOCUMENTS USED TO GENERATE THIS REPORT BEING STORED: The
More informationNATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS
NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS Palm Desert, CA The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) is the nation s core postsecondary education data collection program. It is a single,
More informationTransportation Equity Analysis
2015-16 Transportation Equity Analysis Each year the Seattle Public Schools updates the Transportation Service Standards and bus walk zone boundaries for use in the upcoming school year. For the 2014-15
More informationTable of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7
Table of Contents Section Page Internship Requirements 3 4 Internship Checklist 5 Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6 Student Agreement Form 7 Consent to Release Records Form 8 Internship
More informationGUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION
GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION A Publication of the Accrediting Commission For Community and Junior Colleges Western Association of Schools and Colleges For use in
More informationKENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING
KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING With Specialist Frameworks for Other Professionals To be used for the pilot of the Other Professional Growth and Effectiveness System ONLY! School Library Media Specialists
More informationPROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program
PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM Institution Submitting Proposal Degree Designation as on Diploma Title of Proposed Degree Program EEO Status CIP Code Academic Unit (e.g. Department, Division, School)
More informationPSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016
PSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016 Instructor: Gary Alderman Office Location: Kinard 110B Office Hours: Mon: 11:45-3:30; Tues: 10:30-12:30 Email: aldermang@winthrop.edu Phone:
More informationCooper Upper Elementary School
LIVONIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS www.livoniapublicschools.org/cooper 213-214 BOARD OF EDUCATION 213-14 Mark Johnson, President Colleen Burton, Vice President Dianne Laura, Secretary Tammy Bonifield, Trustee Dan
More informationPUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY
CALIFORNIA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY, POMONA Landscape Architecture College of Environmental Design PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY Landscape Architecture Accreditation Board (LAAB) accredited programs are
More information10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.
UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution. Began admitting upperclassmen in 1975 and began admitting underclassmen in 1990. 1 A
More informationThe University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary
The University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary The University of North Carolina General Administration January 5, 2017 Introduction The University of
More informationUniversity of Oregon College of Education School Psychology Program Internship Handbook
University of Oregon College of Education School Psychology Program Internship Handbook 2017-2018 School Psychology Program Website https://education.uoregon.edu/spsy TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction...
More informationRace, Class, and the Selective College Experience
Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience Thomas J. Espenshade Alexandria Walton Radford Chang Young Chung Office of Population Research Princeton University December 15, 2009 1 Overview of NSCE
More informationDepartment of Social Work Master of Social Work Program
Dear Interested Applicant, Thank you for your interest in the California State University, Dominguez Hills Master of Social Work (MSW) Program. On behalf of the faculty I want you to know that we are very
More informationAssessment of Student Academic Achievement
Assessment of Student Academic Achievement 13 Chapter Parkland s commitment to the assessment of student academic achievement and its documentation is reflected in the college s mission statement; it also
More informationBasic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)
Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal 2016-2017 Date Submitted: March 14, 2016 Check One: New Proposal: Continuing Project: X Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing) Control # 87-413 - EOPS
More informationA Diverse Student Body
A Diverse Student Body No two diversity plans are alike, even when expressing the importance of having students from diverse backgrounds. A top-tier school that attracts outstanding students uses this
More informationStrategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
29-21 Strategic Plan Dashboard Results Office of Institutional Research and Assessment Binghamton University Office of Institutional Research and Assessment Definitions Fall Undergraduate and Graduate
More information4. Long title: Emerging Technologies for Gaming, Animation, and Simulation
CGS Agenda Item: 17 07 Eastern Illinois University Effective Fall 2018 New Course Proposal DGT 4913, Emerging Technologies for Gaming, Animation, Simulation Banner/Catalog Information (Coversheet) 1. _X_New
More informationI. Proposal presentations should follow Degree Quality Assessment Board (DQAB) format.
NEW GRADUATE PROGRAM ASSESSMENT CRITERIA POLICY NUMBER ED 8-5 REVIEW DATE SEPTEMBER 27, 2015 AUTHORITY PRIMARY CONTACT SENATE ASSOCIATE VICE-PRESIDENT, RESEARCH AND GRADUATE STUDIES POLICY The criteria
More informationILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD
-6-525-2- HAZEL CREST SD 52-5 HAZEL CREST SD 52-5 HAZEL CREST, ILLINOIS and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each year. 2 7 ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD
More informationOFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report
2014-2015 OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT Annual Report Table of Contents 2014 2015 MESSAGE FROM THE VICE PROVOST A YEAR OF RECORDS 3 Undergraduate Enrollment 6 First-Year Students MOVING FORWARD THROUGH
More informationILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD
-6-525-2- Hazel Crest SD 52-5 Hazel Crest SD 52-5 Hazel Crest, ILLINOIS 2 8 ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each year.
More informationCore Strategy #1: Prepare professionals for a technology-based, multicultural, complex world
Wright State University College of Education and Human Services Strategic Plan, 2008-2013 The College of Education and Human Services (CEHS) worked with a 25-member cross representative committee of faculty
More informationNational Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
2008 NSSE National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Understanding SRU Student Engagement Patterns of Evidence NSSE Presentation Overview What is student engagement? What do we already know about student
More informationUniversity of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes
University of Utah FRESHMAN-COHORT GRADUATION RATES All Students Student-Athletes # 2009-10 Graduation Rate 64% 64% Four-Class Average 61% 64% Student-Athlete Graduation Success Rate 87% 1. Graduation-Rates
More informationFELLOWSHIP PROGRAM FELLOW APPLICATION
FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM 2016 17 FELLOW APPLICATION FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM ABOUT THE PROGRAM The Continuing Care Leadership Coalition (CCLC) Fellowship Program is a health care management experience designed to
More informationThe College of Law Mission Statement
The College of Law Mission Statement The mission of the College of Law is to create an intellectual environment that prepares students in the legal practice of their choice, enhances the College s regional
More informationMayo School of Health Sciences. Clinical Pastoral Education Internship. Rochester, Minnesota.
Mayo School of Health Sciences Clinical Pastoral Education Internship Rochester, Minnesota www.mayo.edu Clinical Pastoral Education Internship PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The Clinical Pastoral Education (CPE)
More informationCollege of Court Reporting
College of Court Reporting Campus Effectiveness Plan 2016-2017 Reporting Period: July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017 College of Court Reporting 455 West Lincolnway Valparaiso, Indiana 46385 (219) 531-1459 www.ccr.edu
More informationTentative School Practicum/Internship Guide Subject to Change
04/2017 1 Tentative School Practicum/Internship Guide Subject to Change Practicum and Internship Packet For Students, Interns, and Site Supervisors COUN 6290 School Counseling Practicum And COUN 6291 School
More information46 Children s Defense Fund
Nationally, about 1 in 15 teens ages 16 to 19 is a dropout. Fewer than two-thirds of 9 th graders in Florida, Georgia, Louisiana and Nevada graduate from high school within four years with a regular diploma.
More informationAppendix K: Survey Instrument
Journal of Southeast Asian American Education and Advancement Volume Article 12 2011 Appendix K: Survey Instrument Wayne E. Wright University of Texas, San Antonio, wewright@purdue.edu Sovicheth Boun The
More informationJuly 17, 2017 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL. John Tafaro, President Chatfield College State Route 251 St. Martin, OH Dear President Tafaro:
July 17, 2017 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL John Tafaro, President Chatfield College 20918 State Route 251 St. Martin, OH 45118 Dear President Tafaro: This letter is formal notification of action taken by the Higher
More informationStatus of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine
Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine The figures and tables below are based upon the latest publicly available data from AAMC, NSF, Department of Education and the US Census Bureau.
More information5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity
5 Programmatic Equity It is one thing to take as a given that approximately 70 percent of an entering high school freshman class will not attend college, but to assign a particular child to a curriculum
More informationAlbany Technical College Overview Goals Student Success and Implementation Team Conclusion Next Steps...
?33333 Dr. Josephine Reed-Taylor Chief Academic Officer Technical College System of Georgia 1800 Century Place, NE Atlanta, Georgia 30345-4304 December 2015 Contents Albany Technical College... 8 Overview...
More informationRAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI
RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI Agenda Introductions Definitions History of the work Strategies Next steps Debrief
More informationLesson M4. page 1 of 2
Lesson M4 page 1 of 2 Miniature Gulf Coast Project Math TEKS Objectives 111.22 6b.1 (A) apply mathematics to problems arising in everyday life, society, and the workplace; 6b.1 (C) select tools, including
More informationBSW Student Performance Review Process
BSW Student Performance Review Process Students are continuously evaluated in the classroom, the university setting, and field placements to determine their suitability for the social work profession.
More informationMaster of Social Work Field Education University of New Hampshire. Policy and Procedure Manual
Master of Social Work Field Education University of New Hampshire Policy and Procedure Manual 2012-2013 University of New Hampshire College of Health and Human Services Department of Social Work 55 College
More informationWest Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA
Georgia Teacher Academy for Preparation and Pedagogy Pathways to Certification West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA 20220 770-583-2528 www.westgaresa.org 1 Georgia s Teacher Academy Preparation
More informationMathematics Program Assessment Plan
Mathematics Program Assessment Plan Introduction This assessment plan is tentative and will continue to be refined as needed to best fit the requirements of the Board of Regent s and UAS Program Review
More informationKeene State College SPECIAL PERMISSION FORM PRACTICUM, INTERNSHIP, EXTERNSHIP, FIELDWORK
Keene State College SPECIAL PERMISSION FORM PRACTICUM, INTERNSHIP, EXTERNSHIP, FIELDWORK DEPARTMENT NUMBER (Official use only) CREDITS COURSE TITLE: STUDENT NAME: (print) TERM: ID#: COURSE OUTLINE: Description
More informationJohn F. Kennedy Middle School
John F. Kennedy Middle School CUPERTINO UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT Steven Hamm, Principal hamm_steven@cusdk8.org School Address: 821 Bubb Rd. Cupertino, CA 95014-4938 (408) 253-1525 CDS Code: 43-69419-6046890
More informationStandards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS
Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS World Headquarters 11520 West 119th Street Overland Park, KS 66213 USA USA Belgium Perú acbsp.org info@acbsp.org
More informationAPPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HEALTH CAREERS OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM College Science Enrichment Program (CSEP) & Pre-Enrollment Support Program (PESP) Website: http://www.mu.edu/hcop INSTRUCTIONS: Please type or print
More informationIS FINANCIAL LITERACY IMPROVED BY PARTICIPATING IN A STOCK MARKET GAME?
21 JOURNAL FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATORS, 10(1), SUMMER 2010 IS FINANCIAL LITERACY IMPROVED BY PARTICIPATING IN A STOCK MARKET GAME? Cynthia Harter and John F.R. Harter 1 Abstract This study investigates the
More informationCollege of Education & Social Services (CESS) Advising Plan April 10, 2015
College of Education & Social Services (CESS) Advising Plan April 10, 2015 To provide context for understanding advising in CESS, it is important to understand the overall emphasis placed on advising in
More informationGraduate Division Annual Report Key Findings
Graduate Division 2010 2011 Annual Report Key Findings Trends in Admissions and Enrollment 1 Size, selectivity, yield UCLA s graduate programs are increasingly attractive and selective. Between Fall 2001
More informationNew Program Process, Guidelines and Template
New Program Process, Guidelines and Template This document outlines the process and guidelines for the Florida Tech academic units to introduce new programs (options, minors, degree, for-credit certificate
More informationNATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE 2004 Results) Perspectives from USM First-Year and Senior Students Office of Academic Assessment University of Southern Maine Portland Campus 780-4383 Fall 2004
More informationAfrican American Studies Program Self-Study. Professor of History. October 9, 2015
African American Studies Program Self-Study Director: Administrator: John Thornton Professor of History Deirdre James October 9, 2015 This self-study represents an update of the Academic Planning Self-Study
More informationEvaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program
Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program Sarah Garner University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 Michael J. Tremmel University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 Sarah
More informationState Parental Involvement Plan
A Toolkit for Title I Parental Involvement Section 3 Tools Page 41 Tool 3.1: State Parental Involvement Plan Description This tool serves as an example of one SEA s plan for supporting LEAs and schools
More informationHIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN
HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview 1 Eligible Credit Flexibility Plans 2 Earned Credit from Credit Flexibility Plans 2 Student Athletes 3 Application Process 3 Final
More informationA. General Information
A1 Address Information A1 Name of College/University: University of Michigan A1 Mailing Address: A1 City/State/Zip/Country: Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1817 A1 Street Address (if different): A1 City/State/Zip/Country:
More informationHokulani Elementary School
Hokulani Elementary Code: 109 Status and Improvement Report Year -11 Contents Focus On Standards Grades K-5 This Status and Improvement Report has been prepared as part of the Department's education accountability
More informationNewburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan
Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic Academic Intervention Services Plan Revised September 2016 October 2015 Newburgh Enlarged City School District Elementary Academic Intervention Services
More informationSelf Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT
Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT 84341-5600 Document Generated On June 13, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Standard 1: Purpose and Direction 2 Standard 2: Governance
More informationEffective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students
Critical Issues in Dental Education Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students Naty Lopez, Ph.D.; Rose Wadenya, D.M.D., M.S.;
More information