Undergraduate Program-Level Intended Outcomes Matrix Identify Each Intended Outcome

Transcription

1 Undergraduate Program-Level s Matrix Identify Each Tool of SLO1: Demonstrate understanding of sport management principles and fundamentals Measure 1 Portfolio submitted in the senior year in SM 570 Measure 2 Organizational Analysis Paper submitted at the end of the Internship in senior year. Evaluation by Site Supervisor of Internship Student s Professional Preparation. Measure 4 Exit Survey completed at end of the internship in the student s senior year. Portfolio Rubric: students will score an average score of 4 or higher across all sport management competency categories. The Organizational Analysis Paper Rubric: score an average score of 4 or higher across all sport management competency categories. Evaluation Form: 80% of students will be rated 4 or higher on appropriate knowledge in sport management related to the area in which the student worked. 80% student evaluation of the quality of their academic preparation in their major is 4 or above on 5 point scale % Meets % Does not % Meets % Does not Four measures were used to assess SLO1. The intended outcomes were realized. Organizational analysis paper scores for students completing SM 470 between their junior and senior year continue to

2 Tool of be lower than scores of students who complete all academic requirements prior to taking SM 470. Portfolio show a mean accounting score below 4 and a mean socio-cultural score below continue to struggle with how to provide documentation of their work when most work is completed on a textbook company website. Sport management faculty have begun to help students think of accounting assignments they can include in their portfolios. Sport management faculty are communicating more clearly and consistently the importance of students saving their work in an electronic portfolio on the cloud, however students see their sport and society class as a general education course rather than as a sport management course. Will closely monitor exit survey to determine any trends. SLO 2 Demonstrate ability to use critical thinking skills to analyze problems and propose solutions to sport management situations Measure 1 Organizational Analysis Paper submitted at the end of the Internship in senior year students score of 4 out of 5 or higher in critical thinking skills section of the organizational analysis paper rubric % Exceeds Measure 2 SM 570 case study analysis papers evaluated with rubric. Portfolio submitted in the senior year in SM 570 students must average 75% or higher on the four case studies to be considered proficient in critical thinking skills. have a score of 4 or higher on % Exceeds % Exceeds

3 MAPP 2 scores assessed by the University, after the student has completed 90 credit hours. Measure 4 Internship Final Evaluation Report. Tool critical thinking skills item. Mean MAPP2 scores will be above the mean of the College of Health and Human Services. 80% of students will score 4 out of 5 or higher on critical thinking skills item. Sport Management College University N/A The Sport Management mean is higher than the College mean. of N/A Meets % Exceeds Five measures were used to assess SLO2. s were realized for all measures. MAPP2 critical thinking scores were higher in AY 2015 than in AY 201. Continue to monitor. SLO 3 Utilize effective oral and written communication skills in the professional context of sport management Measure 1 Portfolio submitted in the senior year in SM 570. Portfolio rubric: have a written communication skills score of 4 out of 5 or higher % Meets Measure 2 Organizational Analysis paper submitted at the end of the score of 4 out of 5 or higher in written communication % Meets

4 Internships in senior year WP003 scores Measure 4 Internship Final Evaluation Report Tool skills section of the organizational analysis paper rubric Sport management pass rate will be above 80% 80% of have a score of 4 out of 5 or higher on written and oral communication item Pass Rate = 929% of N/A N/A Meets % Meets Five measures were used to assess SLO3. outcomes were realized in all measures. The WP003 pass rate for AY 2015 was higher than the college pass rate (92.27%) and the university pass rate (92.14%). SLO 4: Demonstrate proficiency in using technology for analysis and communication. Measure 1 Portfolio Portfolio Rubric: submitted in the senior year score 4 out of 5 in SM 570 or higher in (development Technology of flyers, Skills section. presentations, financial reports, entry into spreadsheet or base software, % Exceeds

5 website work, etc.) Measure 2 Technological proficiency is demonstrated through professional presentation of the organizational analysis paper and including visual displays such as tables, charts, graphics, and appendices verifying projects students completed during the internship. Score of 75% or higher on standard test of MS Office 2007 in 4 software areas administered in the course AD 101. Measure 4 Evaluation by Site Tool achieve a mean score of 4 or higher on the technological proficiency section. earn a C or higher in AD 101. Evaluation Form: 80% of of % Meets % Meets % Meets

6 Supervisor of Internship Student s Professional Preparation. Tool achieve a mean score of 4 or higher on use of basic office technology of Four measures were used to assess SLO outcome was realized. Organizational analysis were lower than portfolio. This occurrence may be explained by the fact that some students took SM 470 during the summer between their junior and senior year. Undergraduate Program-Level Operational Effectiveness s Matrix Identify Each Operational Effectiveness Goal and Measurement Tool(s) Benchmark Data Summary OEG 1: To maintain optimal enrollment and student retention and graduation rates in sport management. Measure 1 Graduation rates; Freshmen to Sophomore retention rates Graduation rate equal to or higher than the University s rate; Freshmen to sophomore retention rate equal to or higher than the University s rate 6 year university graduation rate for 2009 cohort = 48% University s freshman to sophomore retention rate was from 2014 to Pre-Sport Management 6 year graduation rate = 40.9% Retention rate for cohort formally admitted to BSSM s. Graduation rate for cohort admitted to BSSM s. Pre-Sport Management Major retention rate does not.

7 Pre-Sport Management freshman to sophomore retention rate = 52% Pre-Sport Management Major graduation rate does not. 1 year retention rate for cohort formally admitted to BSSM in AY 2013 = 87.75% 1 year retention rate for 2014 AY cohort formally admitted to BSSM = 100% BSSM 2013 cohort 63% graduated by 2015 AY. Measure 2 Student Exit Survey: 80% of students report a score of 4 or higher on overall quality of the major exceeds s % report score of 4 or higher Does not OEG 2: To establish and maintain relationships with key stakeholder groups (students, alumni, campus departments, regional sport organizations). Measure 1 Advisory Board Minutes Measure 2 Student Exit Survey: Advisory board did not in spring students report a score of 4 or higher on quality of knowledge content in major, quality of instructors and quality of advisement Quality of knowledge content = % report quality exceeds. Meets Quality of instructors = % report quality exceeds s. Does not Site Supervisor Evaluation of 80% of site supervisors score effectiveness of curriculum 4 or higher % of 21 supervisors Meets

8 Student Intern s Professional Preparation reported score of 4 or higher. OEG 3: To grow in providing effective teaching and learning and commitment to the teacher scholar model. Measure 1 Attendance at Meets s Professional Conferences, Presentations, Peer Reviewed Journal Publications Measure 2 Professional Development Seminar Attendance conferences attended, professional memberships, state/national/international presentations, peer reviewed journal publications and books or monographs for the year > than number of full-time sport management faculty Each faculty member will attend more than 2 per year. (There are 2 faculty development days annually). Conferences attended = 5 Memberships = 7 Presentations = 3 Peer reviewed journal publications = 2 Faculty member A attended 3. Faculty member B attended 10. Faculty member C attended Exceeds OEG1 Further examination of exit survey is needed to determine if this is part of a trend. The mean score for quality of instructors has been 4 or higher for 6 of the past 9 years. Faculty will review whether it is appropriate to compare for pre-sport management students to the university or not. 59.1% of students who were not formally admitted remained at the university and graduated. It appears that on students formally admitted to the BSSM more accurately shows the operational effectiveness of the undergraduate program than the on students who declare pre-sport management. OEG2 The Sport Management Advisory Board did not based on feedback from members that they prefer a fall ing to a spring ing since many are involved in the baseball industry. A fall ing is planned for Notes: 1) Provide all explanations of this table that follows. 2) If you are using different operational outcomes measures for different degree programs, please replicate this form, using one form for each program that has different measures. 3) If different programs use the same measures, only one copy of this form is needed.