Follow-up Survey of Community College Graduates. CSM Report
|
|
- Ira Watts
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Follow-up Survey of Community College Graduates CSM Report Planning, Institutional Effectiveness, and Research Office Kathleen Rottier, Ph.D., Executive Director Chip Keech, Planning and Assessment Analyst (principal author) Shannon Acton, Research Analyst Kathy Marshall, Institutional Research Analyst Jennifer Houchin, Executive Assistant
2
3 Table of Contents List of Tables...ii List of Figures...iii Executive Summary...v Introduction...1 Population and Limitations...1 Methodology...2 Data Tabulation...2 Results and Discussion: The Community College Experience...2 Results and Discussion: Transfer Activities...6 Results and Discussion: Employment Activities...11 Conclusion...15 Appendix A: Survey Instrument...A-1 i
4 List of Tables Table 1: Graduate Rating of Important Objectives...3 Table 2: Most Important Objective as Identified by Graduates...3 Table 3: Graduate Satisfaction with Educational Goal Achievement MPAR 7/KPI G Table 4: Attend Same Community College?...4 Table 5: Enroll in Same Program?...5 Table 6: Improvement of Academic Skills and Increased Personal Change...5 Table 7: Graduate Rating of Community College Experience...6 Table 8: Where Transferred?...7 Table 9: Graduate Rating of Community College Transfer Preparation MPAR 13/KPI G Table 10: Graduate Rating of Community College Transfer Preparation: 2005 Compared to Table 11: Current Major Same as Community College Program...9 Table 12: Percent of Transfer Credit Acceptance...9 Table 13: Employment Status CSM, Peers and State...11 Table 14: Employment Status CSM Trends...11 Table 15: Percent of Career Program Graduates Employed Full-time in a Related Field MPAR Table 16: Graduate Rating of Community College Employment Preparation MPAR 21/KPI G Table 17: Graduate Rating of Employment Preparation: 2005 Compared to ii
5 List of Figures Figure 1: Most Important Objective Achieved?...4 Figure 2: Education Since Graduating CSM?...7 Figure 3: Percent of Transfer Credit Acceptance...10 Figure 4: Reasons Courses with a Grade of C or Better Not Accepted...10 Figure 5: Job Related to Community College Program...12 Figure 6: Community College Preparation for Employment...13 Figure 7: Distribution of Job Location of Graduates Employed Full- or Part-time...14 Figure 8: Current Gross Salary Employed Full-time...15 iii
6 iv
7 Executive Summary All community colleges in Maryland, in collaboration with the Maryland Higher Education Commission (MHEC), conduct follow-up surveys of their graduates every three years. Several items from the graduate follow-up survey are reported to MHEC as indicators in the annual Maryland Performance Accountability Report (MPAR) and to CSM stakeholders as Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in CSM s Quality Improvement Process (QIP). The purpose of the survey is to help community colleges and MHEC assess and improve programs and services. This report presents the results of the most current administration of the survey, conducted in 2009, of the graduates. Where possible, peer and statewide averages have been included for comparison purposes, and trends from prior administrations of the survey at CSM are also included. The survey results are displayed and discussed beginning on page 2 under the three components of the survey: the college experience, transfer activities, and employment activities. Methodology and Population utilized the 2008 Degree Information System (DIS) file to identify 755 students meeting the study criteria. The population for the study consists of all students who graduated from CSM in fiscal year 2008 (July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2008) with an associate s degree or certificate. PIER provided the student data to MHEC. MHEC prepared the surveys and sent them to CSM for mailing. The survey package included: a cover letter from Dr. Gottfried explaining the purpose of the survey and to encourage participation; the survey instrument; and a postage-paid return envelope to encourage recipients to respond. The survey package was mailed to students in May, 2009 with a deadline for return in June, Follow-up mailings were sent to nonresponders two weeks after the initial mailing. Because the response rate was below the desired 30% after the deadline, PIER staff made 284 telephone calls to non-responders. This yielded 14 survey responses which raised the response rate to 32%. Completed surveys were mailed to MHEC for data tabulation. A data file with all CSM responses was provided to CSM from MHEC for internal use in March, Selected Findings Below is a list of selected findings from the survey results. A complete discussion of the results can be found in the Results and Discussion sections of the report, beginning on page 2 of this document. The respondents to this survey placed high importance on earning an associate s degree or certificate (mean = 2.91) and lowest importance on updating skills for a current job (mean = 1.81) [scale of very important = 3 to not important = 1]. The results closely align with the peer mean and statewide mean ratings. (page 3) v
8 A large majority (81%) felt their most important objective was achieved while almost all (96%) felt their most important objective was at least partly achieved. (page 4) The aspects of the community college experience most highly rated by CSM respondents were [scale of very good = 5 to very poor = 1]: overall college experience (mean = 4.42), overall quality of college (mean = 4.35) and quality of classroom instruction (mean = 4.27). The areas least highly rated were: job placement/referral services (mean = 3.39), academic advising (mean = 3.73) and student activities (mean = 3.75). (page 6) Of those respondents who graduated from transfer programs, three-quarters (75%) stated that CSM prepared them very well or well for transfer. This figure is reported as MPAR Indicator 13 and CSM KPI G2-03, Graduate Satisfaction with Transfer Preparation. (page 8) The survey results show that students are having more credits accepted by their transfer institutions than they did ten years ago. The biggest reason for non-acceptance of credits was that there was no comparable course offered at the transfer institution. (pages 9-10) Over one-half (56%) of the CSM respondents who graduated from a career program and are employed full-time work in the same field as the program from which they graduated. This figure is reported as MPAR Indicator 20, Percent of Career Program Graduates Employed Full-Time in a Related Field. (pages 11-12) Over one-third (36%) of the CSM respondents who graduated from a career program and are employed full-time working in the same field or a somewhat-related field of their program stated that the college prepared them very well for employment. This figure is reported as MPAR Indicator 21 and CSM KPI G2-04, Graduate Satisfaction with Job Preparation. (pages 12-13) Conclusion Analyses of the results show that CSM graduates are much like their counterparts who graduated from other community colleges in Maryland. The CSM results for many of the questions closely align with peer and statewide averages. The CSM results show that graduates place high importance on earning an associate s degree or certificate and preparing to transfer to a four-year institution. They expressed satisfaction with their educational goal achievement at CSM. CSM graduates rated the overall college experience and overall quality of the college highly. The CSM results also show that over one-half (57%) of the graduates have transferred to four-year institutions, and three-quarters (75%) felt that they were well-prepared for transfer. Recent CSM graduates report greater success in having more of their community college credits accepted by their transfer institutions than those graduates from ten years ago. vi
9 The majority of the graduates (84%) are employed on at least a part-time basis, with over three-quarters (77%) stating that CSM prepared them well for employment. A large majority (83%) of the graduates stated that they work in Maryland. Generally, the findings show that graduates are satisfied with the CSM college experience and the preparation received for transferring to four-year institutions and/or entering the workforce. vii
10 vii
11 Follow-up Survey of Community College Graduates College of Southern Maryland Introduction All community colleges in Maryland, in collaboration with the Maryland Higher Education Commission (MHEC), conduct follow-up surveys of their graduates every three years. Prior to the administration of the graduate follow-up survey administered in 2006, the survey was administered biennially. Several items from the graduate follow-up survey are reported to MHEC in the annual Maryland Performance Accountability Report (MPAR) and to CSM stakeholders as Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in CSM s Quality Improvement Process (QIP). The purpose of the survey is to help community colleges and MHEC assess and improve programs and services. The survey instrument, which can be found in Appendix A of this document, was revised by MHEC extensively with the most current administration of the survey. Several new questions were added to the survey, and choices available to survey respondents were modified for several questions. Because of this, current results may not be comparable to past results. Trends and percent changes from the previous survey results are presented throughout the document, but caution should be exercised when making inferences from this type of information. This report presents the results of the most current administration of the survey, conducted in 2009, of the graduates. Throughout the document, the survey results are labeled representing the year of graduation (i.e., the 2008 results refer to the most recent survey administration, the 2005 results refer to the graduate follow-up survey administered in 2006, and so on). Where possible, peer and statewide information have been included for comparison purposes. The survey results are displayed and discussed beginning on page 2 under the three components of the survey: the college experience, transfer activities, and employment activities. Population and Limitations The population of the survey consists of all students who graduated from CSM in fiscal year 2008 (July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2008) with an associate s degree or certificate. In February 2009, the Planning, Institutional Effectiveness, and Research Office (PIER) identified all students who graduated from CSM with an associate s degree or certificate in fiscal year 2008 (July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2008) using the 2008 Degree Information System (DIS) file. The total number of students identified was 755. Of this population, 232 students (31%) returned surveys to CSM. Because 18 of the 755 surveys were returned as undeliverable, the adjusted response rate was 32% (232/737). The response rate to the survey has remained very consistent over time; it was 31% for the three prior administrations ( , , and graduates) of the graduate follow-up survey. The MHEC target for the survey response rate was 30%, and the community colleges 1
12 response rates ranged from a high of 40.9% to a low of 16.8%. The statewide average response rate was 26.1%. The sample size yielded a margin of error of ±5.36% at the 95% confidence interval, slightly lower than the survey of graduates. This means that we can be 95% confident that, if we had responses from all of the graduates, their responses would be the same as the sample, ±5.36%. Methodology PIER utilized the Degree Information System (DIS) file to identify 755 students meeting the study criteria (all students who graduated from CSM in fiscal year 2008 with an associate s degree or certificate). PIER provided the student data to MHEC. MHEC prepared the surveys and sent them to CSM for mailing. Prior to sending the survey package to students, PIER sent a postcard to the CSM survey population informing them of the survey and a drawing that they would automatically be entered in for returning a completed survey. The survey package included: a cover letter from Dr. Gottfried explaining the purpose of the survey and to encourage participation; the survey instrument; and a postage-paid return envelope to encourage recipients to respond. The survey package was mailed to students in May, 2009 with a deadline for return of Friday, June 17, Follow-up mailings were sent to nonresponders two weeks after the initial mailing. Because the response rate was below the desired 30% after the deadline, PIER staff made 284 telephone calls to non-responders. This yielded 14 survey responses which raised the response rate to 32%. Completed surveys were mailed to MHEC for data tabulation. Data Tabulation PIER used the survey instrument developed and required by MHEC. The survey instrument can be found in Appendix A of this document. The completed surveys were returned to MHEC for data tabulation. A data file with all CSM responses was provided to CSM from MHEC for internal use in March, MHEC prepared two reports of the information: The Follow-up Survey of Maryland Community College Graduates which provides frequencies and cross-tabulations to many items from the survey, and the 2008 Community College Graduates Follow-up Survey Report, which provides analyses of the data. Both documents can be found on MHEC s website at Results and Discussion: The Community College Experience The first seven questions on the survey center around the experiences of community college graduates while they were in the community college. The first question on the survey asked graduates to rate several objectives that might be achieved by attending a community college as 2
13 very important (3), somewhat important (2) or not important (1). Then, they were asked to mark, of those listed, the objective they considered most important. Table 1, below, shows the mean (average) of graduates responses for CSM, its peers (Frederick, Harford and Howard Community Colleges), and the statewide mean in descending order of importance as rated by CSM graduates. The respondents to this survey placed high importance on earning an associate s degree or certificate (mean = 2.91) and lowest importance on updating skills for a current job (mean = 1.81). The results closely align with the peer mean and statewide mean ratings. Table 1. Graduate Rating of Important Objectives (Question 1) CSM Peer State Earn an associate's degree or certificate Prepare for transfer to a four-year institution Self enrichment Prepare for entry into first career Prepare for entry into different career Update skills for current job Table 2, below, displays the graduates ratings of the most important objective. The top two most important objectives as identified by the CSM respondents were to earn an associate s degree or certificate (45%) and prepare for transfer to a four-year institution (31%). Those percentages are almost identical to the peer and statewide results. Table 2. Most Important Objective as Identified by Graduates (Question 1) CSM Peer State # % # % # % Earn an associate's degree or certificate 98 45% % % Prepare for transfer to a four-year institution 66 31% % % Prepare for entry into first career 22 10% 49 10% 238 9% Prepare for entry into different career 18 8% 37 7% 228 9% Update skills for current job 3 1% 7 1% 52 2% Self enrichment 9 4% 20 4% 138 5% Total Figure 1, next page, displays the percentages of CSM respondents that felt their most important objective, from Question 1, was completely achieved, partly achieved, or not at all achieved by the time they graduated. A large majority (81%) felt their most important objective was achieved while almost all (96%) felt their most important objective was at least partly achieved. 3
14 Figure 1. Most Important Objective Achieved? (Question 2) Partly, 15% Not at all, 4% Completely, 81% Responses to question 2 are reported in MPAR Indicator 7 and CSM KPI G2-01 Graduate Satisfaction with Education Goal Achievement. Table 3, below, shows the information for the five instances of survey administration, along with the percent change from the last survey, and an indication of the trend of the data. The benchmark for this indicator is 95%; CSM s current rate (96%) exceeds that benchmark. The trend of the data is flat, but also very high (ranging from 91% to 98%). The peer mean for 2008 is slightly higher than CSM s with an increase of six percentage points over the last administration of the survey. Table 3. Graduate Satisfaction with Educational Goal Achievement (Question 2) - MPAR 7/KPI G2-01 Percent of respondents who completely or partly achieved their most important objective Change Trend CSM 98% 91% 92% 95% 96% 1% Peer 96% 95% 95% 92% 98% 6% A new question to the survey is question 3, If you had to do it over again, would you attend the same community college?. Table 4, below, shows that the vast majority (91%) of respondents stated that they would, if they had to do it all over again, attend CSM again. This result mirrors the peer (91%) and statewide (92%) results with a slightly higher percentage (8%) unsure whether they would attend CSM again (peer = 4%, statewide = 6%). Table 4. Attend Same Community College? (Question 3) CSM Peer State # % # % # % Yes % % % No 3 1% 24 4% 71 2% Not sure 18 8% 24 4% 165 6% Total
15 Another new question to the survey is question 4, If you had to do it over again, would you enroll in the same program?. Table 5, below, shows that nearly three out of four (71%) CSM graduates would enroll in the same program. This result mirrors the peer (71%) and exceeds statewide (69%) results. Table 5. Enroll in Same Program? (Question 4) CSM Peer State # % # % # % Yes % % % No 35 15% 70 12% % Not sure 33 14% 90 16% % Total Questions 5 and 6, both new on the survey, asked graduates to rate how attending the community college affected their mastery of skills and increased personal change in certain areas. Table 6, below, presents the results to both of those questions, each in descending order by CSM graduates responses. A majority of CSM respondents believed that they improved their mastery of writing skills (93%), understanding of science and technology (91%), and mathematics skills (88%) by attending CSM. A majority of CSM respondents also stated they experienced increased clarity of educational and career goals (87%) and increased self-confidence (86%) by attending CSM. The CSM results are similar to the peer and statewide results. Table 6. Improvement of Academic Skills and Increased Personal Change (Questions 5 and 6 ) CSM Peer State Academic Skills Writing skills 93% 89% 89% Understanding of science and technology 91% 89% 90% Mathematics skills 88% 82% 83% Computer skills 85% 82% 82% Reading comprehension 82% 80% 81% Personal Change Clarity of educational and career goals 87% 87% 88% Self-confidence 86% 86% 87% Enjoyment of learning 81% 83% 83% Appreciation of cultural diversity 63% 73% 71% Appreciation of art, music and literature 61% 67% 62% Table 7, next page, shows the mean responses to question 7 which asked graduates to rate several aspects of the community college experience as very good (5), good (4), fair (3), poor (2), or very poor (1). Responses of no basis to judge were excluded from the calculation. This is a new question to the survey except for overall quality of the college which has been asked on 5
16 previous administrations of the survey. The table lists each area in descending order by CSM graduates mean rating. The areas most highly rated by CSM respondents were: overall college experience (mean = 4.42), overall quality of college (mean = 4.35) and quality of classroom instruction (mean = 4.27). The areas least highly rated were: job placement/referral services (mean = 3.39), academic advising (mean = 3.73) and student activities (mean = 3.75). The mean results for CSM, particularly the highest rated and lowest rated areas, are very similar to the peer and statewide mean ratings. The mean rating for overall quality of the college in the 2005 survey was 4.22 (compared to 4.35 in the most recent survey). Statistical significance testing, used to determine the likelihood that a finding or a result is caused by something other than just chance, was conducted between these two means; the test, conducted at the 95% confidence interval, determined that the difference in the means is not statistically significant. Table 7. Graduate Rating of Community College Experience (Question 7) CSM Peer State Overall college experience Overall quality of college Quality of classroom instruction Faculty availability/helpfulness Library Quality of online instruction Access to information technology Class scheduling Tutorial services Quality of laboratory equipment Student activities Academic advising Job placement/referral services Results and Discussion: Transfer Activities Questions 8 through 13 on the survey center around the transfer experiences of community college graduates. Question 8, a new question on the survey, asked graduates if they have taken courses at a college or university since graduating from their community college. Figure 2, next page, displays the transfer activities of CSM respondents. Over one-half (57%) stated that they have transferred to a four-year school on at least a half-time basis. Over one-third (37%) indicated that they have taken no college courses since graduating from CSM. Peer and statewide data are not available for this question. 6
17 Figure 2. Education Since Graduating CSM? (Question 8) No courses since graduation 37% Full-time at four-year 37% Community college 6% Part-time at four-year 20% Question 9, new to the survey, asked graduates to indicate to which college or university they transferred. Table 8, below, shows the transfer colleges and universities, by type, of the CSM respondents. The highest number of respondents transferred to University of Maryland, University College, followed by Towson University, and University of Maryland, College Park. Table 8. Where Transferred? (Question 9) Maryland Public Bowie State University 3 Frostburg State University 3 St. Mary's College of Maryland 9 Towson University 13 University of Baltimore 2 UM Baltimore 1 UM Baltimore County 2 UM College Park 11 UM University College 63 Maryland Private College of Notre Dame 1 Stevenson University 1 Other MD Private 3 Out-of-State Public 8 Out-of-State Private 11 Other 2 7
18 Responses to question 10 are reported in MPAR Indicator 13 and CSM KPI G2-03 Graduate Satisfaction with Transfer Preparation. The percentages reported for this indicator reflect those respondents who graduated from a transfer program and rated their transfer preparation as very well or well. Table 9, below, shows the information for the past five instances of survey administration, along with the percent change from the last survey, and an indication of the trend of the data. The benchmark for this indicator is 83%; CSM s current rate (75%) is below that benchmark. The trend of the CSM data is down, and the current rate is the lowest among the past five administrations of the survey. The peer and statewide averages for 2008 are slightly higher than CSM s, with both dropping from the last survey administration. Statistical significance testing, used to determine the likelihood that a finding or a result is caused by something other than just chance, was conducted on the CSM responses to this question for the 2005 (mean = 4.14) and 2008 (mean = 4.05) surveys; the test, conducted at the 95% confidence interval, determined that the difference in the means is not statistically significant. Table 9. Graduate Rating of Community College Transfer Preparation as Very Well or Well (Question 10) MPAR 13/KPI G2-03 Respondents who graduated from a transfer program Change Trend CSM 80% 80% 85% 81% 75% -6% Peer Mean 81% 84% 79% 85% 80% -5% State 80% 79% 85% 82% 79% -3% The wording of the available responses to question 10 changed from the 2005 survey to the 2008 survey. It is important to note this, as it appears to have had a detrimental impact on the percentage of respondents who rated transfer preparation in the top two ratings. The middle category, previously fair now moderately well, has increased from 14% to 23% while the top two ratings decreased; there seemed to be no impact to the bottom two ratings. Table 10, below, illustrates this point. Table 10. Graduate Rating of Community College Transfer Preparation (Question 10) 2005 Survey Results Compared to 2008 Survey Results Respondents who graduated from a transfer program Response # % Response # % Very Good 29 40% Very Well 28 35% Good 30 41% Well 32 40% Fair 10 14% Moderately Well 18 23% Poor 3 4% Poorly 0 0% Very Poor 1 1% Very Poorly 2 3% Total
19 Question 11, new to the survey, asked graduates to indicate whether their current major is related to the program from which they graduated at their community college. Table 11, below, shows the responses for those who indicated that they transferred, either full-time or part-time, to a four-year college or university. Over one-half of CSM graduates (53%) who transferred state that they are pursuing programs at four-year colleges or universities that are the same academic field as the program from which they graduated at CSM. This is slightly higher than the peers (49%) and statewide (50%) figures. More than four out of every five CSM graduates (83%) who transferred state that they are pursuing programs at four-year colleges or universities that are the at least somewhat-related to the academic field as the program from which they graduated at CSM. Again, this is slightly higher than the peers (78%) and statewide (80%) figures. Table 11. Current Major Same as Community College Program (Question 11) Respondents who transferred to four-year college or university CSM Peer State # % # % # % Same academic field 69 53% % % Somewhat-related academic field 39 30% 79 29% % Different academic field 22 17% 60 22% % Total In question 12, respondents were asked to select a range of credit hours with a grade of C or better that were not accepted by their transfer college or university. Table 12, below, displays the CSM and statewide results for the five administrations of the survey. Peer comparison data is available only for the current survey. Both the CSM and statewide responses show that more credits are now accepted by transfer institutions than they were ten years ago. Table 12. Percent of Transfer Credit Acceptance (Question 12) Respondents who transferred to four-year college or university Change Trend CSM All credits accepted 16% 17% 45% 53% 40% -13% Lost 1-6 credits 63% 26% 36% 25% 29% 4% Lost over 6 credits 21% 56% 19% 23% 31% 8% Peer All credits accepted 46% Lost 1-6 credits Data Not Available 30% Lost over 6 credits 24% State All credits accepted 14% 16% 45% 45% 40% -5% Lost 1-6 credits 50% 47% 32% 30% 32% 2% Lost over 6 credits 36% 37% 23% 26% 28% 2% 9
20 Figure 3, below, shows the 2008 CSM responses to question 12 with all of the credit hour ranges that were available for selection. Figure 3. Percent of Transfer Credits Not Accepted (Question 12) credits, 4% More than 20 credits, 10% credits, 4% None, 40% 7-10 credits, 13% 1-6 credits, 29% Question 13, new to the survey, asked graduates to indicate reasons that the courses with a grade of C or better were not accepted. Figure 4, below, shows the results for CSM, peers and statewide responses. A slightly higher percentage of CSM graduates stated that the reason their courses would not transfer was because there was no comparable course offered at the transfer college or university. Figure 4. Reasons Courses with Grade of C or Better Not Accepted (Question 13) 50% 40% 30% 30% 26% 28% 34% 29% 29% CSM 20% 10% 5% 8% 6% 12% 11% 13% Peer State 0% Changed major Earned over 60 credits No comparable course offered at transfer college Other 10
21 Results and Discussion: Employment Activities Questions 14 through 18 on the survey center around the employment experiences of community college graduates. Table 13, below, displays the employment statuses stratified into four groups as reported by respondents from CSM, its peers, and statewide. CSM has more graduates reporting that they are working full-time (35 or more hours per week) and fewer that are unemployed (includes homemakers, unemployed, and retired) than those from the peer institutions and statewide. Table 13. Employment Status - CSM, Peers and State (Question 14) CSM Peer State Employed full-time 59% 49% 55% Employed part-time 25% 29% 25% Active duty military 0 1% 1% Unemployed 16% 21% 19% Table 14, below, displays the employment statuses as reported by the respondents for five instances of survey administration, along with the percent change from the last survey, and an indication of the trend of the data. This question changed with the current survey, and no longer asks whether the graduate is a full- or part-time student (now asked in question 8). The category active duty military was added to the current survey. Respondents were asked to mark all that apply. Although the percentage of those employed full-time has dropped since the last administration of the survey (from 66% in 2005 to 59% in 2008), the trend remains flat over the past five administrations of the survey. The percentages of those employed part-time and those that are unemployed are trending upward. Table 14. Employment Status - CSM Trends (Question 14) Change Trend Employed full-time 64% 56% 56% 66% 59% -7% Employed part-time 16% 22% 26% 18% 25% 7% Active duty military 0% Full-time homemaker 5% 5% 5% 3% 4% 1% Unemployed and seeking a job 2% 1% 7% 4% 7% 3% Unemployed and not seeking a job 0% 1% 1% 1% 4% 3% Retired 0% 1% 2% 0% 0% 0% Responses to question 15 are reported in MPAR Indicator 20 Percent of Career Program Graduates Employed Full-Time in a Related Field. The percentages reported for this indicator reflect those respondents who graduated from a career program and are employed full-time in jobs that are in the same field or are somewhat-related to the field of their academic major. Figure 5, next page, shows that over one-half (56%) of the CSM respondents who graduated from a career program and are employed full-time work in the same field as the program from 11
22 which they graduated. Four out of every five (80%) of those meeting that criteria work in at least a field somewhat-related to their program at CSM. Figure 5. Job Related to Community College Program (Question 15) Different field, 20% Somewhatrelated field, 24% Same field, 56% Table 15, below, shows the results for question 15 for the five instances of survey administration, along with the percent change from the last survey, and an indication of the trend of the data. The benchmark for this indicator is 86%; CSM s current rate (80%) is below that benchmark. The trend of the CSM data is down, and the current rate is the second-lowest among the five iterations of the survey. Peer and statewide comparison information for 2008 for this question is not provided in the reports prepared by MHEC. The trend for the peers, excluding the unavailable 2008 data, is upward. Statistical significance testing was conducted on the CSM responses to this question for the 2005 and 2008 surveys; the test, conducted at the 95% confidence interval, determined that the difference in the means is not statistically significant. Table 15. Percent of Career Program Graduates Employed Full-time in a Related Field (Question 15) MPAR Change Trend CSM 88% 79% 86% 86% 80% -6% Peer 76% 86% 88% 88% n/a Responses to question 16 are reported in MPAR Indicator 21 and CSM KPI G2-04, Graduate Satisfaction with Job Preparation. The percentages reported for this indicator reflect those respondents who graduated from a career program, are employed full-time in jobs that are in the same field or are somewhat-related to the field of their academic major, and rated their preparation for employment as very well or well. Figure 6, next page, shows that over one-third (36%) of the CSM respondents who graduated from a career program and are employed full-time working in the same field or somewhat-related field of their program stated that the college prepared them very well for employment. Over three-quarters (77%) of those meeting that criteria stated that the college prepared them well or very well for employment. 12
23 Figure 6. Community College Preparation for Employment (Question 16) Moderately well, 23% Very well, 36% Well, 41% Table 16, below, shows the results for question 16 for the five instances of survey administration, along with the percent change from the last survey, and an indication of the trend of the data. The benchmark for this indicator is 83%; CSM s current rate (77%) is below that benchmark. Although the current rate is the lower than the previous rate, the overall trend for CSM is moving upward. Peer and statewide comparison information for 2008 is not available. The trend for the peers, excluding the unavailable 2008 data, is upward. Statistical significance testing was conducted on the CSM responses to this question for the 2005 and 2008 surveys; the test, conducted at the 95% confidence interval, determined that the difference in the means is not statistically significant. Table 16. Graduate Rating of Community College Employment Preparation (Question 16) MPAR 21/KPI G2-04 Rating of Very Well or Well Change Trend CSM 72% 71% 80% 78% 77% -1% Peer 80% 82% 89% 85% n/a As with question 10 of the survey, the wording of the available responses to question 16 changed from the 2005 survey to the 2008 survey. It is important to note this, as it appears to have had a detrimental impact on the percentage of respondents who rated transfer preparation in the top two ratings. The middle category, previously fair now moderately well, has increased from 8% to 23% while the top two ratings decreased; there seemed to be little impact to the other ratings. Table 17, next page, illustrates this point. 13
24 Table 17. Graduate Rating of Employment Preparation (Question 16) 2005 Survey Results Compared to 2008 Survey Results Choices # % Choices # % Very Good 23 36% Very Well 24 36% Good 32 50% Well 27 41% Fair 5 8% Moderately Well 15 23% Poor 0 0% Poorly 0 0% Very Poor 1 2% Very Poorly 0 0% No Basis to Judge 3 5% 0 0% Total Question 17, significantly revised in the current survey, asked graduates to indicate where their primary job is located. Figure 7, below, shows the current results for CSM respondents. Of those CSM graduates who stated that they work either a full- or part-time job, the large majority (83%) stated that they currently work in Maryland. Figure 7. Distribution of Job Location of Graduates Employed Full- or Part-time (Question 17) Working in Washington, D.C. 8% Other location 9% Working in Maryland 83% 14
25 Question 18, new to the survey, asked graduates to identify the income range of their current gross salary (before overtime, deductions and taxes). Figure 8, below, shows the current results for CSM respondents who stated they work a full-time job. The results are fairly evenly split with the lowest percentage falling in the less than $20,000 range. Figure 8. Current Gross Annual Salary Employed Full-time (Question 18) 12% 18% 15% 6% 15% 19% 15% Less than $20,000 $20,000 to $29,999 $30,000 to $39,999 $40,000 to $49,999 $50,000 to $59,000 $60,000 to $69,999 $70,000 or more Conclusion Maryland s community colleges work collaboratively with the Maryland Higher Education Commission to administer follow-up surveys of their graduates every three years. The purpose of the survey is to help community colleges and MHEC assess and improve programs and services. The survey instrument was significantly expanded for this administration period and consists of three components: the college experience, transfer activities, and employment activities. Survey results are reported in key decision-making documents such as in Indicators 7, 13, 20, and 21 of the Maryland Performance Accountability Report (MPAR) and Indicators G2-01, G2-03, and G2-04 of the CSM Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that are shared with the stakeholders of the institution. The results and discussion sections of the report display the benchmarks established for each of these indicators, along with peer comparisons and trends for the past five administrations of the survey. CSM has experienced mixed results for these indicators, with current results for three of the four indicators (MPAR 13, 20, and 21) falling below the established benchmarks. The trends for these indicators also are mixed with MPAR 21 trending upward, MPAR 7 flat, and MPAR 13 and 20 trending downward. It is important to note the discussion contained in the report about the changes to the wording of the questions used for MPAR indicators 13 and 21 and how these changes seem to have had a negative impact on the results when compared to previous survey results. Analyses of the results show that CSM graduates are much like their counterparts who graduated from other community colleges in Maryland. The CSM results for many of the questions closely align with peer and statewide averages. 15
26 The CSM results show that graduates place high importance on earning an associate s degree or certificate and preparing to transfer to a four-year institution. They expressed satisfaction with their education goal achievement at CSM, and also stated that they improved their academic skills such as writing skills and understanding of science and technology by attending CSM. Attending CSM also helped graduates gain clarity of their educational and career goals and gain self-confidence. CSM graduates rated the overall college experience and overall quality of the college highly. The CSM results also show that over one-half (57%) of the graduates have transferred to four-year institutions with most of them transferring to University of Maryland, University College; Towson University; and University of Maryland, College Park. Threequarters (75%) felt that they were well-prepared for transfer. Recent CSM graduates report that they are more successful in having more of their community college credits accepted by their transfer institutions than those graduates from ten years ago. The majority of the graduates (84%) are employed on at least a part-time basis, with over one-half (56%) of those employed full-time stating that they work in the same academic field as their program of study at CSM. Over three-quarters (77%) felt that CSM prepared them well for employment. A large majority (83%) of the graduates stated that they work in Maryland. Generally, the findings show that graduates are satisfied with the CSM college experience and the preparation received for transferring to four-year institutions and/or entering the workforce. 16
27 Appendix A: Survey Instrument Follow-up Survey of Maryland Community College Graduates A-1
28 FOLLOW-UP SURVEY OF Maryland Community College Graduates The purpose of this survey is to help your community college and the Maryland Higher Education Commission assess and improve programs. Please complete this questionnaire and return it in the pre-paid envelope provided. All individual responses will remain confidential. Thank you for your assistance in helping us evaluate our programs and services. 1. Below are several objectives one might achieve at a community college. In the left-hand columns, please rate how important each of these objectives was to you. Then, in the far-right column, mark the one that was your SINGLE MOST important objective. Very Important Mark the most important objective (Select only one) Somewhat Important Not important O O O Earn an Associate s Degree or Certificate O O O O Prepare for transfer to a four-year institution O O O O Prepare for entry into first career O O O O Prepare for entry into different career O O O O Update skills for current job O O O O Self Enrichment O 2. Was your most important objective (as reported in Q. 1 above) achieved by the time you graduated from your community college? O Completely O Partly O Not at all 3. If you had to do it over again, would you attend the same community college? O Yes O No O Not sure 4. If you had to do it over again, would you enroll in the same program? O Yes O No O Not sure 5. Please rate how attending your community college affected your mastery of each of the following skills. Mastery of Skills As a Result of Community College Attendance No Improvement At All Improved a Great Deal Improved a Fair Amount Writing skills O O O Mathematics skills O O O Understanding of science and technology O O O Reading comprehension O O O Computer skills O O O 6. Please rate how attending your community college affected you in each of the following areas. Personal Change As a Result of Community College Attendance Increased a Great Deal Increased Somewhat Remained the Same Appreciation of art, music and literature O O O Clarity of educational and career goals O O O Self-confidence O O O Appreciation of cultural diversity O O O Enjoyment of learning O O O 7. Please rate each of the following aspects of your community college experience. Mark the response that most closely reflects your opinion. Choose No basis to judge if you did not have any experience with an item. Very Good Good Fair Poor Very Poor No basis to judge Overall college experience O O O O O O Quality of classroom instruction O O O O O O Quality of online instruction O O O O O O Quality of laboratory equipment O O O O O O Faculty availability/helpfulness O O O O O O Class scheduling O O O O O O Academic advising O O O O O O Library O O O O O O Tutorial services O O O O O O Student activities O O O O O O Job placement/referral services O O O O O O Access to information technology O O O O O O Overall quality of college O O O O O O TRANSFER COLLEGE INFORMATION 8. Have you taken courses at a college or university since graduating from your community college? (Select only one) O Yes, primarily as a full-time student at a 4-year institution. (12 or more credits per semester) O Yes, primarily as a part-time student at a 4-year institution. (less than 12 credits per semester) O Yes, primarily as a student at a community college. (Skip to Q. 14) O No, I have not taken any courses since graduating. (Skip to Q. 14)
29 9. To which 4-year college or university did you transfer? Maryland Public Selected MD Private O Bowie State Univ. O Baltimore Hebrew O Stevenson University O Coppin State College O Capitol College (formerly Villa Julie) O Frostburg State Univ O College of Notre Dame O Washington College O Morgan State Univ O Columbia Union O Other MD Private Inst O Salisbury Univ O Goucher College Specify: O St. Mary s College O Hood College O Towson Univ O Johns Hopkins Univ O Univ of Baltimore O Loyola College Other O UM Baltimore O Maryland Inst Col of Art O Out-of State Private O UM Baltimore County O McDaniel College (W. MD) O Out-of-State Public O UM College Park O Mt. St. Mary s Univ Specify: O UM Eastern Shore O St. John s College O UM University College O Sojourner- Douglass 10. How well did your community college prepare you for transfer to this 4-yr institution? O Very Well O Well O Moderately Well O Poorly O Very Poorly 11. Is your current major in the same academic field as the program from which you graduated at your community college? O Same academic field O Somewhat related academic field O Different academic field 12. How many credit hours with a C or better were NOT accepted by your transfer college/university? O None O 1-6 O 7-10 O O O More than Why were the courses with a C or better NOT accepted? (Mark all that apply.) O Changed major O Earned over 60 credits O No comparable course offered at the transfer college O Other (please specify) 15. How is your job related to your community college program? O Same field O Somewhat related field O Different field 16. How well did your community college prepare you for employment? O Very well O Well O Moderately Well O Poorly O Very Poorly 17. Where is your primary job located? O Allegany O Cecil O Kent O Washington County O Washington DC O Anne Arundel O Charles O Montgomery O Wicomico O Pennsylvania O Baltimore City O Dorchester O Prince George s O Worcester O Virginia O Baltimore County O Frederick O Queen Anne s O Delaware O Calvert O Garrett O St. Mary s O West Virginia O Caroline O Harford O Somerset O Other Area O Carroll O Howard O Talbot 18. Please select the range that includes your current gross annual salary (before overtime, deductions, and taxes)? PLEASE REMEMBER, ALL RESPONSES ARE CONFIDENTIAL! O Less than $20,000 O $45,000 to $49,999 O $20,000 to $24,999 O $50,000 to $54,999 O $25,000 to $29,999 O $55,000 to $59,999 O $30,000 to $34,999 O $60,000 to $64,999 O $35,000 to $39,999 O $65,000 to $69,999 O $40,000 to $44,999 O $70,000 or more ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 19. Please use the space below to enter any additional comments that you would like to share concerning your community college experience (e.g. what you liked best about your community college experience, what you would suggest to improve the community college experience, etc.). EMPLOYMENT INFORMATION 14. What is your current employment status? (Mark all that apply) O Employed full-time (35 or more hours per week) O Employed part-time (less than 35 hours per week) O Active duty military O Full-time homemaker O Unemployed and seeking a job O Unemployed and not seeking a job O Retired If you selected any of these three options, please Continue to Q. 15. Otherwise, SKIP to Q. 19. Thank you for completing this questionnaire. Please return it in the enclosed prepaid envelope.
SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION
SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION Report March 2017 Report compiled by Insightrix Research Inc. 1 3223 Millar Ave. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan T: 1-866-888-5640 F: 1-306-384-5655 Table of Contents
More informationJOB OUTLOOK 2018 NOVEMBER 2017 FREE TO NACE MEMBERS $52.00 NONMEMBER PRICE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND EMPLOYERS
NOVEMBER 2017 FREE TO NACE MEMBERS $52.00 NONMEMBER PRICE JOB OUTLOOK 2018 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND EMPLOYERS 62 Highland Avenue, Bethlehem, PA 18017 www.naceweb.org 610,868.1421 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationUK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions
UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions November 2012 The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) has
More informationTOPIC: Biennial Exempt Market Salary Survey Report and FY Structures Adjustment
BOARD OF REGENTS SUMMARY OF ITEM FOR ACTION, INFORMATION OR DISCUSSION TOPIC: Biennial Exempt Market Salary Survey Report and FY 2015 2016 Structures Adjustment COMMITTEE: Finance DATE OF COMMITTEE MEETING:
More informationTable of Contents Welcome to the Federal Work Study (FWS)/Community Service/America Reads program.
Table of Contents Welcome........................................ 1 Basic Requirements for the Federal Work Study (FWS)/ Community Service/America Reads program............ 2 Responsibilities of All Participants
More informationILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD
-6-525-2- Hazel Crest SD 52-5 Hazel Crest SD 52-5 Hazel Crest, ILLINOIS 2 8 ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each year.
More informationNATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE 2004 Results) Perspectives from USM First-Year and Senior Students Office of Academic Assessment University of Southern Maine Portland Campus 780-4383 Fall 2004
More informationUniversity of Waterloo School of Accountancy. AFM 102: Introductory Management Accounting. Fall Term 2004: Section 4
University of Waterloo School of Accountancy AFM 102: Introductory Management Accounting Fall Term 2004: Section 4 Instructor: Alan Webb Office: HH 289A / BFG 2120 B (after October 1) Phone: 888-4567 ext.
More informationTHE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS ELIZABETH ANNE SOMERS Spring 2011 A thesis submitted in partial
More informationILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD
-6-525-2- HAZEL CREST SD 52-5 HAZEL CREST SD 52-5 HAZEL CREST, ILLINOIS and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each year. 2 7 ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD
More informationBENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT: CARNEGIE PEER INSTITUTIONS, 2003-2011 PREPARED BY: ANGEL A. SANCHEZ, DIRECTOR KELLI PAYNE, ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST/ SPECIALIST
More informationMARYLAND BLACK BUSINESS SUMMIT & EXPO March 24-27, 2011 presented by AATC * Black Dollar Exchange * BBH Tours
Baltimore, MD. February 23, 2011 Lou Fields, President of AATC and founder of the Black Dollar Exchange announced the First Annual Maryland Black Business Summit & Expo being held in the City of Baltimore
More informationNational Survey of Student Engagement at UND Highlights for Students. Sue Erickson Carmen Williams Office of Institutional Research April 19, 2012
National Survey of Student Engagement at Highlights for Students Sue Erickson Carmen Williams Office of Institutional Research April 19, 2012 April 19, 2012 Table of Contents NSSE At... 1 NSSE Benchmarks...
More informationGraduate Division Annual Report Key Findings
Graduate Division 2010 2011 Annual Report Key Findings Trends in Admissions and Enrollment 1 Size, selectivity, yield UCLA s graduate programs are increasingly attractive and selective. Between Fall 2001
More informationLongitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers
F I N A L R E P O R T Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers July 8, 2014 Elias Walsh Dallas Dotter Submitted to: DC Education Consortium for Research and Evaluation School of Education
More informationASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE
ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE March 28, 2002 Prepared by the Writing Intensive General Education Category Course Instructor Group Table of Contents Section Page
More information(Includes a Detailed Analysis of Responses to Overall Satisfaction and Quality of Academic Advising Items) By Steve Chatman
Report #202-1/01 Using Item Correlation With Global Satisfaction Within Academic Division to Reduce Questionnaire Length and to Raise the Value of Results An Analysis of Results from the 1996 UC Survey
More informationSTATE CAPITAL SPENDING ON PK 12 SCHOOL FACILITIES NORTH CAROLINA
STATE CAPITAL SPENDING ON PK 12 SCHOOL FACILITIES NORTH CAROLINA NOVEMBER 2010 Authors Mary Filardo Stephanie Cheng Marni Allen Michelle Bar Jessie Ulsoy 21st Century School Fund (21CSF) Founded in 1994,
More informationMontana's Distance Learning Policy for Adult Basic and Literacy Education
Montana's Distance Learning Policy for Adult Basic and Literacy Education 2013-2014 1 Table of Contents I. Introduction Page 3 A. The Need B. Going to Scale II. Definitions and Requirements... Page 4-5
More informationFRANK J. UNDERWOOD 1st Vice President
FRANK J. UNDERWOOD 1st Vice President Maryland State Firemen s Association April 12, 2008 Ocean City is quickly approaching and I am looking forward to the MSFA presidential election. For the past 4 years
More informationReference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.
PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT FACULTY DEVELOPMENT and EVALUATION MANUAL Approved by Philosophy Department April 14, 2011 Approved by the Office of the Provost June 30, 2011 The Department of Philosophy Faculty
More informationRussell M. Rhine. Education
Russell M. Rhine 46477 Mirage Court Lexington Park, MD 20653 Home (301) 737-7818 rmrhine@smcm.edu Saint Mary s College of Maryland 18952 E. Fisher Road Saint Mary s City, MD 20686-3001 Work (240) 895-4596
More informationIntroduction to Questionnaire Design
Introduction to Questionnaire Design Why this seminar is necessary! Bad questions are everywhere! Don t let them happen to you! Fall 2012 Seminar Series University of Illinois www.srl.uic.edu The first
More informationJunior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013
Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013 List of Institutions Number of School Name Students AIKEN TECHNICAL COLLEGE, SC 119 ARKANSAS NORTHEASTERN COLLEGE, AR 66 ASHLAND
More informationU VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study
About The Study U VA SSESSMENT In 6, the University of Virginia Office of Institutional Assessment and Studies undertook a study to describe how first-year students have changed over the past four decades.
More informationEDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT By 2030, at least 60 percent of Texans ages 25 to 34 will have a postsecondary credential or degree. Target: Increase the percent of Texans ages 25 to 34 with a postsecondary credential.
More informationPrincipal vacancies and appointments
Principal vacancies and appointments 2009 10 Sally Robertson New Zealand Council for Educational Research NEW ZEALAND COUNCIL FOR EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH TE RŪNANGA O AOTEAROA MŌ TE RANGAHAU I TE MĀTAURANGA
More informationNATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) 2008 H. Craig Petersen Director, Analysis, Assessment, and Accreditation Utah State University Logan, Utah AUGUST, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary...1
More informationOptions for Tuition Rates for 2016/17 Please select one from the following options, sign and return to the CFO
Options for Tuition Rates for 2016/17 Please select one from the following options, sign and return to the CFO Family Name Student(s) Name(s) Option #1: The Governors Club rate is $17,145 and reflects
More informationFinancing Education In Minnesota
Financing Education In Minnesota 2016-2017 Created with Tagul.com A Publication of the Minnesota House of Representatives Fiscal Analysis Department August 2016 Financing Education in Minnesota 2016-17
More informationEvaluation of Teach For America:
EA15-536-2 Evaluation of Teach For America: 2014-2015 Department of Evaluation and Assessment Mike Miles Superintendent of Schools This page is intentionally left blank. ii Evaluation of Teach For America:
More informationPRINCE GEORGE'S COMMUNITY COLLEGE OFFICE OF STUDENT FINANCIAL AID GUIDELINES FOR THE EDWARD T. CONROY MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM
PRINCE GEORGE'S COMMUNITY COLLEGE OFFICE OF STUDENT FINANCIAL AID GUIDELINES FOR THE EDWARD T. CONROY MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM APPROVED: June 13, 2007 Guidelines for the Edward T. Conroy Memorial Scholarship
More informationMassachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Title I Comparability 2009-2010 Title I provides federal financial assistance to school districts to provide supplemental educational services
More informationNATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE 2002) Perspectives from USM First-Year and Senior Students Office of Academic Assessment University of Southern Maine Portland Campus 780-4383 January 2003 NSSE:
More informationInstitution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research
Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research Standard 1.B.3 states: The institution establishes institution-set standards for student
More informationThe Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3
The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3 The State Board adopted the Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework (December 2009) as guidance for the State, districts, and schools
More informationIowa School District Profiles. Le Mars
Iowa School District Profiles Overview This profile describes enrollment trends, student performance, income levels, population, and other characteristics of the public school district. The report utilizes
More informationSegmentation Study of Tulsa Area Higher Education Needs Ages 36+ March Prepared for: Conducted by:
Segmentation Study of Tulsa Area Higher Education Needs Ages 36+ March 2004 * * * Prepared for: Tulsa Community College Tulsa, OK * * * Conducted by: Render, vanderslice & Associates Tulsa, Oklahoma Project
More informationTeacher Supply and Demand in the State of Wyoming
Teacher Supply and Demand in the State of Wyoming Supply Demand Prepared by Robert Reichardt 2002 McREL To order copies of Teacher Supply and Demand in the State of Wyoming, contact McREL: Mid-continent
More informationNational Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary
National Survey of Student Engagement Spring 2010 University of Kansas Executive Summary Overview One thousand six hundred and twenty-one (1,621) students from the University of Kansas completed the web-based
More informationFRANKLIN D. CHAMBERS,
CURRICULUM VITAE FRANKLIN D. CHAMBERS, Ph.D. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND Doctor of Philosophy: Organizational Communications Howard University, Washington, D.C. Masters Degree: Educational Administration Howard
More informationSELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR REVIEW of the COMPUTER SCIENCE PROGRAM and the INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROGRAM
Disclaimer: This Self Study was developed to meet the goals of the CAC Session at the 2006 Summit. It should not be considered as a model or a template. ABET SELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR REVIEW of the
More informationThe International Coach Federation (ICF) Global Consumer Awareness Study
www.pwc.com The International Coach Federation (ICF) Global Consumer Awareness Study Summary of the Main Regional Results and Variations Fort Worth, Texas Presentation Structure 2 Research Overview 3 Research
More informationThe University of Tennessee at Martin. Coffey Outstanding Teacher Award and Cunningham Outstanding Teacher / Scholar Award
The University of Tennessee at Martin Coffey Outstanding Teacher Award and Cunningham Outstanding Teacher / Scholar Award Instructions Nominations and Submissions DESCRIPTION OF AWARDS The Coffey Outstanding
More informationStandardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015
Standardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015 Peters Township School District, as a public school entity, will enable students to realize their potential to learn, live, lead and succeed. 2
More informationmedicaid and the How will the Medicaid Expansion for Adults Impact Eligibility and Coverage? Key Findings in Brief
on medicaid and the uninsured July 2012 How will the Medicaid Expansion for Impact Eligibility and Coverage? Key Findings in Brief Effective January 2014, the ACA establishes a new minimum Medicaid eligibility
More informationAn Introduction to School Finance in Texas
An Introduction to School Finance in Texas May 12, 2010 Sheryl Pace TTARA Research Foundation space@ttara.org (512) 472-8838 Texas Public Education System 1,300 school districts (#1 in the nation) 1,025
More informationGiving in the Netherlands 2015
Giving in the Netherlands 2015 Prof. R.H.F.P. Bekkers, Ph.D., Prof. Th.N.M. Schuyt, Ph.D., & Gouwenberg, B.M. (Eds., 2015). Giving in the Netherlands: Donations, Bequests, Sponsoring and Volunteering.
More informationSCHOOL. Wake Forest '93. Count
Count ID 43 256 VALID N 256 Q.1A ACTIVITIES YEAR FOLLOWING GRADUATION? Primary Employed full-time 157 61.6% Employed part-time 12 4.7% Unemployed, by choice 3 1.2% Unemployed, seeking employment 7 2.7%
More informationMaryland School-Based Health Center Programs Contact Information FY15
Baltimore City Health Dept. - Baltimore City Francine Childs, Assistant Commissioner Francine.childs@baltimorecity.gov 410-396-4522 Dr. Carter Godwin Woodson K-8 SBHC City Springs Elementary/Middle School
More informationSuggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for
MAINE Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for Research on Higher Education, Graduate School of Education,
More informationVolunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,
Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan, 2005-2010 Mission: Volunteer State Community College is a public, comprehensive community college offering associate degrees, certificates, continuing
More informationDescriptive Summary of Beginning Postsecondary Students Two Years After Entry
NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS Statistical Analysis Report June 994 Descriptive Summary of 989 90 Beginning Postsecondary Students Two Years After Entry Contractor Report Robert Fitzgerald Lutz
More informationHILLSBOROUGH COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS PAYROLL SCHEDULES
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS PAYROLL SCHEDULES NOTE: All payroll schedules reflect standard Lawson biweekly pay periods. Revision as of May 9, 2007 includes: > Substitues (S payroll) and Non-permanent
More informationNORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008
E&R Report No. 08.29 February 2009 NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008 Authors: Dina Bulgakov-Cooke, Ph.D., and Nancy Baenen ABSTRACT North
More informationSELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR REVIEW of the COMPUTER SCIENCE PROGRAM
Disclaimer: This Self Study was developed to meet the goals of the CAC Session at the 2006 Summit. It should not be considered as a model or a template. ABET Computing Accreditation Commission SELF-STUDY
More informationCooking Matters at the Store Evaluation: Executive Summary
Cooking Matters at the Store Evaluation: Executive Summary Introduction Share Our Strength is a national nonprofit with the goal of ending childhood hunger in America by connecting children with the nutritious
More informationTable of Contents PROCEDURES
1 Table of Contents PROCEDURES 3 INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICE 3 INSTRUCTIONAL ACHIEVEMENT 3 HOMEWORK 4 LATE WORK 5 REASSESSMENT 5 PARTICIPATION GRADES 5 EXTRA CREDIT 6 ABSENTEEISM 6 A. Enrolled Students 6 B.
More informationNorthern Virginia Alumnae Chapter of Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Incorporated Scholarship Application Guidelines and Requirements
P.O. Box 4310 Arlington, VA 22204 9998 novac@dstnovac.org Northern Virginia Alumnae Chapter of Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Incorporated Scholarship Application Guidelines and Requirements In 2017, the
More informationService-Learning Projects in a Public Health in Pharmacy Course 1
Service-Learning Projects in a Public Health in Pharmacy Course 1 Jean T. Carter and Gayle A. Cochran School of Pharmacy and Allied Health Sciences, The University of Montana, Skaggs Building, Missoula
More informationMarket Intelligence. Alumni Perspectives Survey Report 2017
Market Intelligence Alumni Perspectives Survey Report 2017 Contents Executive Summary... 2 Introduction.... 5 Key Findings... 6 The Value of a Graduate Management Education.... 8 Three Dimensions of Value....
More informationTHE LUCILLE HARRISON CHARITABLE TRUST SCHOLARSHIP APPLICATION. Name (Last) (First) (Middle) 3. County State Zip Telephone
THE LUCILLE HARRISON CHARITABLE TRUST SCHOLARSHIP APPLICATION 1. Name (Last) (First) (Middle) 2. Street City 3. County State Zip Telephone 4. Are you a permanent resident of Harrison County? 5. M F SSN
More informationArgosy University, Los Angeles MASTERS IN ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP - 20 Months School Performance Fact Sheet - Calendar Years 2014 & 2015
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE FACT SHEET CALENDAR YEARS 2014 & 2015 On Time Completion Rates (Graduation Rates) Calendar Year Number of Students Who Began the Program Students Available for Graduation Number of On
More informationTestimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education
Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education October 3, 2017 Chairman Alexander, Senator Murray, members of the
More informationHigher Education. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education. November 3, 2017
November 3, 2017 Higher Education Pennsylvania s diverse higher education sector - consisting of many different kinds of public and private colleges and universities - helps students gain the knowledge
More informationThe University of Michigan-Flint. The Committee on the Economic Status of the Faculty. Annual Report to the Regents. June 2007
The University of Michigan-Flint The Committee on the Economic Status of the Faculty Annual Report to the Regents June 2007 Committee Chair: Stephen Turner (College of Arts and Sciences) Regular Members:
More information2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS
3 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS Achievement and Accountability Office December 3 NAEP: The Gold Standard The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) is administered in reading
More informationProgram Assessment and Alignment
Program Assessment and Alignment Lieutenant Colonel Daniel J. McCarthy, Assistant Professor Lieutenant Colonel Michael J. Kwinn, Jr., PhD, Associate Professor Department of Systems Engineering United States
More informationSCHOOL PERFORMANCE FACT SHEET CALENDAR YEARS 2014 & TECHNOLOGIES - 45 Months. On Time Completion Rates (Graduation Rates)
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE FACT SHEET CALENDAR YEARS 2014 & 2015 On Time Completion Rates (Graduation Rates) Calendar Year Number of Students Who Began the Program Students Available for Graduation Number of On
More informationFinancial aid: Degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 CU-Boulder Office of Data Analytics, Institutional Research March 2017
CU-Boulder financial aid, degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 Page 1 Financial aid: Degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 CU-Boulder Office of Data Analytics, Institutional Research March 2017 Contents
More informationAvailability of Grants Largely Offset Tuition Increases for Low-Income Students, U.S. Report Says
Wednesday, October 2, 2002 http://chronicle.com/daily/2002/10/2002100206n.htm Availability of Grants Largely Offset Tuition Increases for Low-Income Students, U.S. Report Says As the average price of attending
More informationPROGRAM REVIEW REPORT. Radiation Therapy Technology
INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS The Best Place to Start PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT Radiation Therapy Technology Program Review annually assesses the viability of credit and non-credit instructional programs and
More informationScholarship Reporting
Scholarship Reporting For tax purposes, scholarships are amounts that benefit an undergraduate or graduate student attending an educational institution in pursuit of a degree. Fellowships are amounts paid
More informationNCEO Technical Report 27
Home About Publications Special Topics Presentations State Policies Accommodations Bibliography Teleconferences Tools Related Sites Interpreting Trends in the Performance of Special Education Students
More informationMaryland DC. Campus Compact. Model Programs Impacting Communities
Maryland DC Campus Compact Model Programs Impacting Communities Table of Contents MDCCC Article MDCCC Board SAGE Model Programs SOS AmeriCorps VISTA 3 5 7 9 40 41 Maryland-DC Campus Compact Hood College
More informationVirginia Principles & Practices of Real Estate for Salespersons
Volume 1: January 2015 Virginia Principles & Practices of Real Estate for Salespersons Please read the catalog in its entirety. To register for the VA Online Pre-Licensing Course click on the link on the
More informationColorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans
Colorado State University Department of Construction Management Assessment Results and Action Plans Updated: Spring 2015 Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 List of Tables... 3 Table of Figures...
More information2014 State Residency Conference Frequently Asked Questions FAQ Categories
2014 State Residency Conference Frequently Asked Questions FAQ Categories Deadline... 2 The Five Year Rule... 3 Statutory Grace Period... 4 Immigration... 5 Active Duty Military... 7 Spouse Benefit...
More informationDEPARTMENT OF KINESIOLOGY AND SPORT MANAGEMENT
DEPARTMENT OF KINESIOLOGY AND SPORT MANAGEMENT Undergraduate Sport Management Internship Guide SPMT 4076 (Version 2017.1) Box 43011 Lubbock, TX 79409-3011 Phone: (806) 834-2905 Email: Diane.nichols@ttu.edu
More informationSchool Size and the Quality of Teaching and Learning
School Size and the Quality of Teaching and Learning An Analysis of Relationships between School Size and Assessments of Factors Related to the Quality of Teaching and Learning in Primary Schools Undertaken
More informationThe application is available on the AAEA website at org. Click on "Constituent Groups", then AAFC and then AAFC Scholarship.
TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Arkansas High School Principals and Counselors Christie Jay, AAFC Scholarship Chair Scholarship Award -Arkansas Association of Federal Coordinators The Arkansas Association of Federal
More informationRedirected Inbound Call Sampling An Example of Fit for Purpose Non-probability Sample Design
Redirected Inbound Call Sampling An Example of Fit for Purpose Non-probability Sample Design Burton Levine Karol Krotki NISS/WSS Workshop on Inference from Nonprobability Samples September 25, 2017 RTI
More informationSchool Competition and Efficiency with Publicly Funded Catholic Schools David Card, Martin D. Dooley, and A. Abigail Payne
School Competition and Efficiency with Publicly Funded Catholic Schools David Card, Martin D. Dooley, and A. Abigail Payne Web Appendix See paper for references to Appendix Appendix 1: Multiple Schools
More informationCo-op Placement Packet
Co-op Placement Packet Career Services, 900 Asp Ave, Suite 323, OMU, Norman, OK, 73019 Phone: (405) 325-1974 Fax: (405) 325-3402 www.hiresooner.com ENROLLING IN THE CO-OP COURSE HOW 1. Obtain permission
More informationCalifornia State University, Los Angeles TRIO Upward Bound & Upward Bound Math/Science
Application must be completed in black or blue ink only. STUDENT INFORMATION Name: Social Security # - - First Middle Last Address: Apt.# Phone: ( ) City: State: Zip Code: Date of Birth: Place of Birth:
More informationSystemic Improvement in the State Education Agency
Systemic Improvement in the State Education Agency A Rubric-Based Tool to Develop Implement the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Achieve an Integrated Approach to Serving All Students Continuously
More informationCulture, Tourism and the Centre for Education Statistics: Research Papers
Catalogue no. 81-595-M Culture, Tourism and the Centre for Education Statistics: Research Papers Salaries and SalaryScalesof Full-time Staff at Canadian Universities, 2009/2010: Final Report 2011 How to
More information2005 National Survey of Student Engagement: Freshman and Senior Students at. St. Cloud State University. Preliminary Report.
National Survey of Student Engagement: Freshman and Senior Students at St. Cloud State University Preliminary Report (December, ) Institutional Studies and Planning National Survey of Student Engagement
More informationTeach For America alumni 37,000+ Alumni working full-time in education or with low-income communities 86%
About Teach For America Teach For America recruits, trains, and supports top college graduates and professionals who make an initial commitment to teach for two years in urban and rural public schools
More informationScholarship Application For current University, Community College or Transfer Students
(AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE TOWN OF WESTLAKE) 2014-2015 Scholarship Application For current University, Community College or Transfer Students In 2013 TSHA awarded in excess of $420,000 (market value) scholarships
More informationGrade Dropping, Strategic Behavior, and Student Satisficing
Grade Dropping, Strategic Behavior, and Student Satisficing Lester Hadsell Department of Economics State University of New York, College at Oneonta Oneonta, NY 13820 hadsell@oneonta.edu Raymond MacDermott
More informationHigher Education Six-Year Plans
Higher Education Six-Year Plans 2018-2024 House Appropriations Committee Retreat November 15, 2017 Tony Maggio, Staff Background The Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2011 included the requirement for
More information1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview Section 11.515, Florida Statutes, was created by the 1996 Florida Legislature for the purpose of conducting performance reviews of school districts in Florida. The statute
More informationQUESTIONS ABOUT ACCESSING THE HANDOUTS AND THE POWERPOINT
Answers to Questions Posed During Pearson aimsweb Webinar: Special Education Leads: Quality IEPs and Progress Monitoring Using Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM) Mark R. Shinn, Ph.D. QUESTIONS ABOUT ACCESSING
More informationExecutive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY
Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY 40741-1222 Document Generated On January 13, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Description of the School System 2 System's Purpose 4 Notable
More informationAppendix K: Survey Instrument
Journal of Southeast Asian American Education and Advancement Volume Article 12 2011 Appendix K: Survey Instrument Wayne E. Wright University of Texas, San Antonio, wewright@purdue.edu Sovicheth Boun The
More informationQuantitative Research Questionnaire
Quantitative Research Questionnaire Surveys are used in practically all walks of life. Whether it is deciding what is for dinner or determining which Hollywood film will be produced next, questionnaires
More informationApplication for Fellowship Leave
PDF Fill-In Form: Type On-Screen, then Print for Signatures and Chair Approvals Brooklyn College (2018-2019 Academic Year) Application for Fellowship Leave Instructions for Applicant: Please complete Sections
More informationGCSE English Language 2012 An investigation into the outcomes for candidates in Wales
GCSE English Language 2012 An investigation into the outcomes for candidates in Wales Qualifications and Learning Division 10 September 2012 GCSE English Language 2012 An investigation into the outcomes
More information2014 Comprehensive Survey of Lawyer Assistance Programs
2014 Comprehensive Survey of Lawyer Assistance Programs A m e r i c a n B a r A s s o c i a t i o n 3 2 1 N. C l a r k S t r e e t C h i c a g o, I L 6 0 6 5 4 Copyright 2015 by the American Bar Association.
More information