De Anza College Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Transcription

1 De Anza College Office of Institutional Research and Planning To: Senior Staff From: Mallory Newell, College Researcher Date: March 13, 2017 Subject: Full- Transfers to UC and CSU, to This report reflects data for full- transfers to the University of California and California State University between and. Since is the most recent data from the state Chancellor s Office, in-state private institutions and out-of-state institutions data reflects the most recent three s, to Transfers to University of California (UC) Admission & Enrollment In, the number of De Anza students who applied to a UC is 1,485 69% of De Anza students who applied to a UC were admitted, down from 75% the prior 76% of De Anza students who were admitted to a UC subsequently enrolled, down from 77% the prior Table 1: De Anza UC Applicants: Total Admitted and Total Enrolled, No. of Applicants Total Admitted % of Applicants Admitted Note: The universitywide applicant and admit counts are unduplicated. GPA by UC Campus In, De Anza students enrollment GPA across the nine UC campuses ranged between 3.80 to Table 2: De Anza Full Year Transfers Average GPA by UC Campus, Total Enrolled % of Admitted that Enrolled 1,485 1,024 69% % De Anza's Average GPA Applicant GPA Admitted GPA Enrollment GPA Berkeley Davis Irvine Los Angeles Merced Riverside San Diego Santa Barbara Santa Cruz

2 Transfers by UC Campus Percent change over Between and, transfers to UC declined by 39 students or 5% Between and , transfers to UC increased by 4% (For reference, transfers to UC in totaled 727 students) Between and , transfers to UC increased by 8% Three- change Over the past three s, to, transfers to UC increased by 3% The UC campuses that saw the largest change in transfer increases were: - UC Irvine (increased by 43%) - UC Davis (increased by 15%) - UC Santa Barbara (increased by 8%) In, the UC campuses with the highest number of De Anza transferred students included: UC Davis (25% of all transfers) UC San Diego (22% of all transfers) UC Berkeley (16% of all transfers) Table 3: De Anza Full Year Transfers by UC Campus, to UC Campus 3- change Berkeley 143 9% 132-8% 126-5% -12% Davis 169-6% % 194-2% 15% Irvine 35-13% 57 63% 50-12% 43% Los Angeles 117-6% 116-1% 108-7% -8% Merced 1-50% 1 0% 2 100% Riverside 21 75% 23 10% 21-9% 0% San Diego % 164-5% 170 4% -1% Santa Barbara 49-14% 63 29% 53-16% 8% Santa Cruz 49-8% 61 24% 52-15% 6% Total 756 4% 815 8% 776-5% 3% 2

3 Transfers by Ethnicity In, Asian and international students accounted for the majority of De Anza students who enrolled at a UC, 44% and 36%, respectively White students accounted for 10% of those who enrolled at a UC followed by 5% Latino/a, 3% Domestic Unknown, and 1% African American Table 4: De Anza Full Year Transfers to UC by Ethnicity to Race/Ethnicity Percent Percent Percent African American 11 1% 10 1% 9 1% American Indian 0 0% 3 0% 2 0% Asian % % % Latino/a 42 6% 65 8% 38 5% White 92 12% 89 11% 80 10% Domestic Unknown 34 5% 33 4% 24 3% International % % % Total % % % 3

4 Transfers to California State University (CSU) Transfers by CSU Campus Percent change over In, transfers to CSU resulted in 30 fewer students compared to the, or a 2% decrease in transfer Between and , transfers to CSU increased by 171 students or 14% (For reference, transfers to CSU in totaled 1,225 students) Between and , transfers to CSU decreased by 61 students or 4% In, the CSU campuses with the highest number of De Anza transfer students are San Jose State (709), San Francisco State (207) and East Bay (141); and this is consistent with ly trend Over the past three s, to, overall transfers to CSU decreased by 7% CSU Campus Table 5. Transfers by CSU Campus, to Source: The California State University: College Transfers by Institution Origin Note: Where the base value is zero, no percent change is reported. Bakersfield 3 50% 2-33% 4 100% 33% Channel Islands 1-1 0% 1 0% 0% Chico % 14-30% 22 57% 10% Dominguez Hills % 5 150% 0% East Bay % % % 4% Fresno % 7 17% 600% Fullerton 5-55% 6 20% 10 67% 100% Humboldt % 15 36% 5-67% -55% Long Beach 20 0% 21 5% 21 0% 5% Los Angeles 8 167% 9 13% 16 78% 100% Maritime 0-100% 0 Monterey Bay 13 86% 24 85% 28 17% 115% Northridge 21 31% 14-33% 21 50% 0% Pomona 18-5% 19 6% 16-16% -11% Sacramento % 39 8% 33-15% -8% San Bernardino 0-0 San Diego 13-59% 16 23% 24 50% 85% San Francisco % % % -15% San Jose 814 5% 831 2% % -13% San Luis Obispo % 12-40% 21 75% 5% San Marcos Sonoma 4 300% 4 0% 9 125% 125% Stanislaus 4-43% 9 125% 3-67% -25% Total 1,396 14% 1,335-4% 1,305-2% -7% Change 4

5 Transfers by Ethnicity In, Asian (40%) and Latino/a (19%) students comprised more than half of all racial/ethnic subgroups who transferred to a CSU; and this trend is consistent with ly trends. Over the past three s, to, the largest gains in transfer to a CSU is observed among De Anza s Non-Resident Alien students with an increase of 6% and Latino/a students with a 5% increase in CSU transfers over the three- period. Table 6: De Anza Transfers to CSU by Race/Ethnicity, to Source: The California State University: College Transfers by Institution Origin Note: Other/Unknown includes American Indian, two or more races and decline to state race/ethnicity. Transfers to In-State Private and Out-of-State Institutions Note: is the most recent data from the state Chancellor s Office. Race/Ethnicity Percent Percent Percent African American 42 3% 39 3% 36 3% -14% American Indian 3 0% 4 0% 0% -100% Asian/Pacific Islander % % % 1% Latino/a % % % 5% Filipino 79 6% 0 0% 0 0% -100% Non-Resident Alien % % % 6% Other/Unknown 129 9% 106 8% % 2% White % % % -12% Total 1, % 1, % 1, % -7% In , among De Anza students who transferred to an in-state private or out-of-state institution, the majority of them opted for an out-of-state institution (51%). Change Over the past three s, to , transfers to in-state private institutions declined by 12%, whereas transfers to out-of-state institutions decreased only 1%. Table 7: De Anza Transfers to In-State Private and Out-of-State Institutions, to Percent Percent Percent Change In-State Private % % % -12% Out-Of-State % % % -1% Total % % % -7% Source: CCCCO Data Mart 5