California Smarter Balanced Assessment (SBAC) Results

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "California Smarter Balanced Assessment (SBAC) Results"

Shanon Merritt
6 years ago
Views:

1 California Smarter Balanced Assessment (SBAC) Results October 4, 2017

2 About the Test & Scores Students took the Smarter Balanced (SBAC) assessments between March and June of These tests are part of the broader set of tests known as the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP). The Smarter Balanced assessments were administered for the first time in These assessments are aligned with California standards that are based on the Common Core. California is part of a consortia of 13 states administering the Common Core assessments. SBAC measures knowledge and skills in English language arts/literacy (ELA) and Mathematics for grades 3-8 and 11. These standards are meant to foster college and career readiness. The scores tell us how many students are meeting the standards the goals for what students should know and do at each grade level. They also tell us how many students are exceeding standards, nearly meeting standards, and not meeting standards. Because we now have access to three years of SBAC results, we are able to see trends in improvement from to Source: (accessed August 2017).

3 Data Accessibility WHAT THE DATA CAN TELL US ABOUT PERFORMANCE The percentage of students meeting standards at each grade level How the average student is performing, and how far the average student is above or below gradelevel standards How performance has changed over time How some student groups perform compared to one another, such as: How low-income students are doing in comparison to non-low income students How English learners are doing in comparison to non-english learners How current and former English learners are doing as a whole group How students of color are doing How low income vs. non-low income students of color are doing WHAT THE DATA CAN T TELL US Without further disaggregation and cross tabulation, we still don t know: How the combination of race and gender affect performance; for instance, we don t know how Latino males are doing in comparison to Latina females How the combination of race and disability affect performance; for instance, we don t know how Black students identified for special education are doing in comparison to those who are not How subgroups within the Asian American community are doing How long-term English learners are doing

4 SBAC Summary Findings HIGH-LEVEL DATA TRENDS Improvement from last year to this year has slowed in some places to a trickle. Fewer than half (49%) of all students met standards in English language arts/literacy, and fewer than 4 in 10 students (38%) met standards in Math. Large achievement gaps persist, with economically disadvantaged students, English learners, African American students, and Latino students performing far below their economically advantaged, White, and Asian peers. 3 in 4 (75% of) Latino students did not meet Math standards More than 2 in 3 African American students did not meet Math (81%) or English language arts/literacy (69%) standards Gaps continue to widen between English learners and non-english learners (32% in both Math and ELA).

5 through Trends

6 Math scores marginally improved in Percent Meeting or Exceeding Standards on SBAC Math Across the Grades ( to ) 45% 47% 40% 38% 40% 35% 33% 33% 35% 36% 34% 36% 37% 34% 36% 36% 33% 30% 30% 32% 32% 37% 38% 34% 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 11th ALL GRADES Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017). Numbers may sum differently due to rounding.

7 Achievement gaps across ethnic groups persisted in Math Percent Meeting or Exceeding Standards on SBAC Math, All Grades, by Ethnicity ( to ) 72% 69% 73% 57% 52% 57% 53% 53% 52% 53% 49% 49% 16% 18% 19% 25% 25% 22% 24% 21% 25% 30% 31% 27% 37% 38% 34% African American American Indian Asian Filipino Latino Pacific Islander White Two or More Races ALL STUDENTS Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017). Numbers may sum differently due to rounding.

8 English language arts/literacy scores marginally improved in Percent Meeting or Exceeding Standards on SBAC ELA Across the Grades ( to ) 49% 45% 47% 48% 49% 43% 44% 45% 42% 44% 44% 45% 47% 47% 49% 49% 38% 40% 59% 60% 56% 48% 49% 44% 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 11th ALL GRADES Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017). Numbers may sum differently due to rounding.

9 Achievement gaps across ethnic groups persisted in English language arts/literacy Percent Meeting or Exceeding Standards on SBAC ELA, All Grades, by Ethnicity ( to ) 75% 72% 76% 70% 70% 65% 64% 61% 64% 63% 64% 59% 31% 31% 28% 36% 36% 33% 37% 37% 32% 42% 42% 38% 48% 49% 44% African American Native American Asian Filipino Latino Pacific Islander White Two or More Races ALL STUDENTS Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017). Numbers may sum differently due to rounding.

10 Gaps between English learners and non-english learners widened in English language arts and Math Percent Meeting or Exceeding Standards on SBAC ELA and Math, All Grades, by English Learner Status ( to ) 50% 54% 54% 39% 42% 43% 11% 13% 12% 11% 12% 12% ELA Math English Learner English Only Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017). Numbers may sum differently due to rounding.

11 Gaps between low income and non low-income students stagnated in both English language arts and Math Percent Meeting or Exceeding Standards on SBAC ELA and Math, All Grades, by Income Status ( to ) 64% 69% 68% 53% 58% 57% 31% 35% 36% 21% 24% 25% ELA Math Low Income Not Low Income Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017). Numbers may sum differently due to rounding.

12 Mathematics Results

13 Math performance was stronger in 3 rd and 4 th grades than other grades Performance on SBAC Math Across the Grades ( ) 19% 17% 28% 24% 18% 18% 18% 20% 13% 18% 16% 19% 19% 16% 19% 20% 25% 32% 27% 28% 27% 23% 24% 27% 28% 28% 39% 35% 36% 40% 44% 36% 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 11th ALL GRADES Standard Not Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Met Standard Exceeded Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017).

14 Achievement gaps were evident in 3 rd grade Performance on SBAC Math, 3 rd Grade, by Ethnicity ( ) 8% 20% 48% 31% 29% 35% 31% 29% 11% 11% 13% 19% 25% 25% 29% 31% 33% 28% 26% 46% 14% 9% 22% 13% 29% 25% 28% 36% 39% 31% 20% 22% 25% 18% 16% 28% African American Asian Filipino Latino Native American Pacific Islander Two or More Races White ALL STUDENTS Standard Not Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Met Standard Exceeded Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017).

15 Reclassified English learners and non low-income students far outperformed English learners and other selected student groups in 3 rd grade Math Performance on SBAC Math, 3 rd Grade, by Selected Student Groups ( ) 10% 24% 28% 37% 34% 33% 20% 13% 30% 6% 22% 21% 19% 19% 29% 39% 8% 14% 29% 28% 29% 24% 23% 19% 26% 25% 8% 24% 46% 60% 24% 28% Low Income Not Low Income English Learner English Only Reclassified - Fluent English Proficient Students with Disabilities Students without Disabilities ALL STUDENTS Standard Not Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Met Standard Exceeded Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017).

16 Most students of color did not meet standards in 8 th grade Math Performance on SBAC Math, 8 th Grade, by Ethnicity ( ) 56% 34% 30% 30% 10% 11% 14% 20% 7% 11% 18% 23% 14% 13% 15% 20% 21% 16% 22% 14% 23% 25% 24% 28% 23% 24% 23% 13% 21% 26% 25% 40% 61% 52% 52% 43% African American Asian Filipino Latino Native American Pacific Islander Two or More Races White ALL STUDENTS Standard Not Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Met Standard Exceeded Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017).

17 Few students in selected student groups met standards in 8 th grade Math Performance on SBAC Math, 8 th Grade, by Selected Student Groups ( ) 35% 10% 13% 21% 3% 4% 24% 22% 12% 23% 18% 18% 18% 24% 28% 3% 11% 4% 22% 20% 18% 16% 25% 23% 53% 22% 81% 35% 36% 82% 35% 40% Low Income Not Low Income English Learner English Only Reclassified - Students with Fluent English Disabilities Proficient Students without Disabilities ALL STUDENTS Standard Not Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Met Standard Exceeded Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017).

18 Few 11 th grade students were considered college-ready in Math Performance on SBAC Math, 11 th Grade, by Ethnicity ( ) 44% 19% 20% 19% 3% 5% 13% 27% 30% 6% 7% 11% 15% 14% 17% 24% 26% 19% 21% 16% 27% 25% 23% 27% 23% 25% 24% 14% 24% 33% 31% 65% 56% 57% 49% 44% 11 th graders who score in the Standard Exceeded range are considered ready for college-level math upon entering a CSU or CCC and may directly enroll in a forcredit math course without taking a placement exam or first enrolling in a developmental math course. African American Asian Filipino Latino Native American Pacific Islander Two or More Races White ALL STUDENTS Standard Not Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Met Standard Exceeded Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017).

19 Most students in selected student groups performed far below standards in high school Math 6% 15% 24% 24% 56% Performance on SBAC Math, 11 th Grade, by Selected Student Groups ( ) 22% 25% 4% 2% 29% 10% 85% 14% 21% 19% 24% 28% 40% 11% 43% 3% 1% 9% 86% 14% 13% 21% 19% 25% 24% 40% 44% 11 th graders who score in the Standard Exceeded range are considered ready for college-level math upon entering a CSU or CCC and may directly enroll in a for-credit math course without taking a placement exam or first enrolling in a developmental math course. Low Income Not Low Income English Learner English Only Reclassified - Fluent English Proficient Students with Disabilities Students without Disabilities ALL STUDENTS Standard Not Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Met Standard Exceeded Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017).

20 African American, 32% Native American, Latino, 39% Pacific Islander, 43% ALL STUDENTS, 57% White, 61% Filipino, 63% Two or More Races, 65% Asian, 83% African American, 14% Native American, 18% Latino, 22% ALL STUDENTS, 25% Pacific Islander, 25% White, 32% Two or More Races, 31% Filipino, 46% Asian, 55% Some low-income ethnic student groups outperformed non-low income ethnic student groups in Math Percent Meeting or Exceeding Standards on SBAC Math, All Grades, by Income by Ethnicity ( ) Low Income 0% 100% Not Low Income Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017).

21 English Language Arts / Literacy Results

22 English language arts/literacy performance was relatively similar across the grades, except in 11 th grade which posted higher scores Performance on SBAC ELA Across the Grades ( ) 23% 23% 20% 17% 16% 15% 28% 20% 21% 22% 27% 31% 34% 33% 32% 28% 24% 20% 21% 26% 23% 26% 21% 23% 32% 35% 33% 27% 27% 25% 19% 28% 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 11th ALL GRADES Standard Not Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Met Standard Exceeded Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017).

23 Most student groups of color did not meet standards in 3 rd grade English language arts/literacy Performance on SBAC ELA, 3 rd Grade, by Ethnicity ( ) 12% 16% 47% 37% 23% 28% 36% 35% 14% 14% 16% 23% 19% 19% 21% 23% 26% 21% 24% 48% 17% 21% 27% 25% 28% 13% 15% 40% 43% 35% 20% 21% 24% 20% 19% 32% African American Asian Filipino Latino Native American Pacific Islander Two or More Races White ALL STUDENTS Standard Not Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Met Standard Exceeded Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017).

24 Performance for 3 rd graders who are low income, learning English, or have disabilities lagged behind that of their peers Performance on SBAC ELA, 3 rd Grade, by Selected Student Groups ( ) 39% 34% 27% 13% 19% 25% 5% 23% 32% 8% 13% 10% 27% 20% 27% 23% 25% 18% 15% 27% 9% 42% 55% 65% 25% 23% 22% 21% 25% 24% 28% 32% Low Income Not Low Income English Learner English Only Reclassified - Fluent English Proficient Students with Disabilities Students without Disabilities Standard Not Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Met Standard Exceeded ALL STUDENTS Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017).

25 Just one-third of African American, Latino, and Native American students were proficient in 8 th grade English language arts/literacy Performance on SBAC ELA, 8 th Grade, by Ethnicity ( ) 7% 25% 40% 25% 37% 44% 8% 8% 10% 29% 27% 31% 24% 24% 39% 40% 15% 33% 28% 41% 14% 20% 9% 11% 30% 30% 30% 33% 35% 29% 21% 22% 26% 15% 15% 25% African American Asian Filipino Latino Native American Pacific Islander Two or More Races White ALL STUDENTS Standard Not Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Met Standard Exceeded Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017).

26 English learners posted the lowest proficiency rates in 8 th grade English language arts/literacy Performance on SBAC ELA, 8 th Grade, by Selected Student Groups ( ) 7% 28% 30% 34% 28% 19% 13% 40% 0% 36% 38% 6% 20% 24% 24% 31% 12% 21% 18% 70% 17% 15% 2% 36% 33% 9% 21% 27% 26% 20% 25% 68% Low Income Not Low English English Only Reclassified - Students with Students ALL Income Learner Fluent English Proficient Disabilities without Disabilities STUDENTS Standard Not Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Met Standard Exceeded Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017).

27 Proficiency rates were highest across student groups in 11 th grade English language arts/literacy, though significant gaps remain Performance on SBAC ELA, 11 th Grade, by Ethnicity ( ) 13% 28% 27% 26% 33% African American 55% 41% 10% 15% 7% 7% 17% 18% 19% 37% 33% 30% 33% 32% 33% 32% 26% 26% 26% 24% 26% 22% Asian Filipino Latino Native American Pacific Islander 40% 39% 16% 16% 21% 12% 12% Two or More Races White 28% 19% ALL STUDENTS 11 th graders who score in the Standard Exceeded range are considered ready for college-level English upon entering a CSU or CCC and may directly enroll in a for-credit English course without taking a placement exam or first enrolling in a developmental English course. Standard Not Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Met Standard Exceeded Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017).

28 Performance varied significantly across selected student groups in 11 th grade English language arts/literacy 17% 26% 25% Performance on SBAC ELA, 11 th Grade, by Selected Student Groups ( ) 41% 32% 33% 16% 11% 1% 9% 27% 19% 25% 25% 21% 21% 16% 13% 15% 19% 63% 32% 24% 33% 38% 4% 13% 59% 30% 28% 34% 32% 11 th graders who score in the Standard Exceeded range are considered ready for college-level English upon entering a CSU or CCC and may directly enroll in a for-credit English course without taking a placement exam or first enrolling in a developmental English course. Low Income Not Low Income English Learner English Only Reclassified - Fluent English Proficient Students with Disabilities Students without Disabilities ALL STUDENTS Standard Not Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Met Standard Exceeded Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017).

29 African American, 48% Native American, 52% Latino, 55% Pacific Islander, 56% ALL STUDENTS, 68% White, 72% Two or More Races, 74% Filipino, 76% Asian, 84% African American, 25% Native American, 28% Latino, 33% ALL STUDENTS, 36% Pacific Islander, 34% White, 44% Two or More Races, 43% Asian, 60% Filipino, 60% Some low-income ethnic student groups performed better than non-low income ethnic student groups in English language arts/literacy Percent Meeting or Exceeding Standards on SBAC ELA, All Grades, by Income by Ethnicity ( ) Low Income 0% 100% Not Low Income Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017).

30 Largest District Comparisons

31 Achievement in Math varied across the state s ten largest districts Percent Meeting or Exceeding Standards on SBAC Math, All Grades, vs % 60% 29% 30% 44% 46% 39% 34% 22% 24% 43% 44% 50% 51% 23% 22% 43% 45% 23% 20% 37% 38% Los Angeles San Diego Long Beach Fresno Elk Grove San Francisco Santa Ana Capistrano Corona-Norco San Bernardino City STATE n=633,621 n=128,040 n=76,428 n=73,356 n=63,061 n=60,133 n=54,505 n=53,613 n=53,157 n=53,152 n=6,228,235 79% LI 60% LI 69% LI 87% LI 53% LI 53% LI 87% LI 22% LI 43% LI 87% LI 58% LI Math Math Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017). Numbers may sum differently due to rounding. LI =low income.

32 Achievement in English language arts/literacy varied across the state s ten largest districts Percent Meeting or Exceeding Standards on SBAC ELA, All Grades, vs % 40% 56% 56% 45% 48% 31% 34% 53% 54% 53% 55% 29% 28% 69% 69% 59% 60% 34% 36% 48% 49% Los Angeles San Diego Long Beach Fresno Elk Grove San Francisco Santa Ana Capistrano Corona-Norco San Bernardino City n=633,621 n=128,040 n=76,428 n=73,356 n=63,061 n=60,133 n=54,505 n=53,613 n=53,157 n=53,152 n=6,228,235 79% LI 60% LI 69% LI 87% LI 53% LI 53% LI 87% LI 22% LI 43% LI 87% LI 58% LI ELA ELA STATE Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017). Numbers may sum differently due to rounding. LI =low income.

33 Achievement in Math varied across the state s ten largest districts for low-income students Percent Meeting or Exceeding Standards on SBAC Math, All Grades, Low-Income Students, vs % 24% 31% 31% 31% 26% 19% 21% 30% 31% 39% 40% 22% 21% 29% 30% 30% 32% 24% 19% 22% 25% Los Angeles San Diego Long Beach Fresno Elk Grove San Francisco Santa Ana Capistrano Corona-Norco San Bernardino City n=633,621 n=128,040 n=76,428 n=73,356 n=63,061 n=60,133 n=54,505 n=53,613 n=53,157 n=53,152 n=6,228,235 79% LI 60% LI 69% LI 87% LI 53% LI 53% LI 87% LI 22% LI 43% LI 87% LI 58% LI Math Math STATE Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017). Numbers may sum differently due to rounding. LI =low income.

34 Achievement in English language arts/literacy varied across the state s ten largest districts for low-income students Percent Meeting or Exceeding Standards on SBAC ELA, All Grades, Low-Income Students, vs % 34% 43% 42% 40% 36% 28% 31% 40% 41% 41% 42% 28% 27% 39% 41% 47% 46% 32% 34% 35% 36% Los Angeles San Diego Long Beach Fresno Elk Grove San Francisco Santa Ana Capistrano Corona-Norco San Bernardino City n=633,621 n=128,040 n=76,428 n=73,356 n=63,061 n=60,133 n=54,505 n=53,613 n=53,157 n=53,152 n=6,228,235 79% LI 60% LI 69% LI 87% LI 53% LI 53% LI 87% LI 22% LI 43% LI 87% LI 58% LI ELA ELA STATE Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017). Numbers may sum differently due to rounding. LI =low income.

35 Districts and Schools Turning the Curve

36 Districts Turning the Curve The percentage of English learners at Fullerton Elementary School District who met or exceeded English language arts/literacy standards increased 5 percentage points from to and 10 percentage points from to Now, 24 percent of English learners are meeting or exceeding ELA standards twice the state average. 13,363 students 44% low income 28% English learners 53% historically underrepresented students of color Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017). Historically underrepresented students of color includes African American, Latino, Native American, and Pacific Islander students.

37 Districts Turning the Curve The percentage of low-income students in Garden Grove who met or exceeded Math standards increased 6 percentage points from to and 1 percentage point from to Currently, 40 percent of low-income students are meeting or exceeding Math standards, compared to 25 percent statewide. 44,223 students 69% low income 38% English learner 55% historically underrepresented students of color Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017). Historically underrepresented students of color includes African American, Latino, Native American, and Pacific Islander students.

38 Schools Turning the Curve The percentage of low-income Latino students at Brawley Union High School in Imperial County who met or exceeded English language arts/literacy standards increased 8 percentage points from to and 26 percentage points from to Now, 62 percent of low-income Latino students are meeting or exceeding ELA standards, compared to 47 percent statewide. 1,672 students 73% low income 22% English learner 90% historically underrepresented students of color Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017). Historically underrepresented students of color includes African American, Latino, Native American, and Pacific Islander students.

39 Schools Turning the Curve The percentage of African American students at Foothill Ranch Middle School in Twin Rivers who met or exceeded Math standards increased 7 percentage points from to and 12 percentage points from to Current Math performance for Black students is 24 percent, compared to 19 percent statewide. 653 students 87% low income 24% English learner 64% historically underrepresented students of color Source: California Department of Education, 2017 (accessed Sept. 2017). Historically underrepresented students of color includes African American, Latino, Native American, and Pacific Islander students.

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine The figures and tables below are based upon the latest publicly available data from AAMC, NSF, Department of Education and the US Census Bureau.