Angelo State University. Accountability Report

Transcription

1 Angelo State University Accountability Report January 2016 Accountability System, January of 23

2 Participation - Key Measures Enrollment 1. Fall headcount (unduplicated) Fall 2000 Fall 2014 % Change Fall 2000 to Institutional Gaps Target- Gaps Completion Total* 6,290 6,389 8, % 7, % White 4,620 (73.4%) 3,416 (53.5%) 4,549 (54.5%) - 1.5% 5, % African American 317 (5.0%) 590 (9.2%) 603 (7.2%) 90.2% % Hispanic 1,189 (18.9%) 1,840 (28.8%) 2,517 (30.2%) 111.7% 2, % Asian 64 (1.0%) 78 (1.2%) 104 (1.2%) 62.5% International 79 (1.3%) 120 (1.9%) 158 (1.9%) 100.0% Other 21 (0.3%) 345 (5.4%) 412 (4.9%) % Flex Entry % Source: Coordinating Board Management (CBM) Report 001 Source: Coordinating Board Management (CBM) Report 001 ASU headcount enrollment has increased 34.4% since Fall 2000, with notable growth in underrepresented populations. Fall 2011 was the first time the University's enrollment had exceeded This fall, the university boasted a fall enrollment of over 8,400. Full-Time Equivalent Enrollment 2. Fall semester credit hours (SCH) includes undergraduate(15), master's(12), doctoral(9), special-professional(12), and optometry(17). Fall 2000 Fall 2014 % Change Total FTSEs 5,277 5,255 6, % State-Funded FTSEs 5,251 5,040 6, % NOTE: The percentage change is based on the actual FTE numbers and may vary slightly from the calculation produced by the rounded numbers. Post-baccalaureate students are counted separately from master s for headcount enrollment and are counted with master s for FTE enrollment calculations. Participation - Contextual Measures Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Point Change 3. First-time undergraduates from Texas top 10% and Texas top 11-25% Students in Texas top 10% 12.7% 10.7% 10.0% Students in Texas top 11-25% N/A 20.9% 20.5% N/A 4. First-time entering applicants accepted 5. First-time accepted, enrolled 64.1% 82.0% 76.1% % 45.4% 46.4% Additional applicant data is available at: FY 2000 FY 2013 FY 2014 Point Change FY 2000 to FY 2014 Accountability System, January of 23

3 6. Racial and ethnic composition of Texas public high school graduates White 51.5% 34.7% 34.2% African American 12.9% 12.9% 12.6% -0.3 Hispanic 32.1% 46.4% 46.8% 14.7 Asian 3.2% 4.0% 4.2% 1.0 Other 0.3% 2.1% 2.2% 1.9 UG Students by SCH taken at 2-year colleges 7. UG Students by SCH taken at 2-year colleges Fall UG Enrollment Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Point Rate Fall UG Enrollment Rate Fall UG Enrollment Rate Change UG Students 5,769 (100%) 5,329 (100%) 7,126 (100%) 0-12 hours 940 (16.3%) 1,202 (22.6%) 1,530 (21.5% ) hours 401 (7.0%) 811 (15.2%) 874 (12.3% ) hours 90 (1.6%) 240 (4.5%) 260 (3.6% ) hours 202 (3.5%) 399 (7.5%) 387 (5.4% ) hours 221 (3.8%) 236 (4.4%) 218 (3.1% ) hours 115 (2.0%) 102 (1.9%) 144 (2.0% ) hours 198 (3.4%) 215 (4.0%) 211 (3.0% ) All Students with SCH at TX 2-Yr college 2,167 (37.6%) 3,205 (60.1%) 3,624 (50.9% ) 13.3 Awarded Core 0 (0.0%) 57 (1.1%) 51 (0.7% ) 0.7 Associate Degree 135 (2.3%) 308 (5.8%) 353 (5.0% ) 2.7 For data about SCHs taken for dual credit by institution, go to Fall 2000 Fall 2014 %/Point Change 8. Semester credit hours Total undergraduate semester credit hours 76,178 71,827 82, % Total graduate semester credit hours 2,380 5,597 9, % Percentage graduate SCH to total SCH 3.0 % 7.2 % 10.4% 7.4 Increases in graduate enrollment have bolstered graduate SCH. ASU has "15 is the new 12" campaign to not only increase undergraduate SCH, but to also encourage on-time graduation. Dual credit enrollment increases have also added significant credit hours. Accountability System, January of 23

4 Participation - Out-of-State Peers Out-of-state peer data is from the Fall 2014 IPEDS report and may not match accountability data because of differences in the source of the data. Accountability measures are primarily derived from institutional data sent to the CB for CBM reports. Data reported on this out-of-state peer link is obtained from the IPEDS system of institutional reporting to the federal government. Data differences may result from different reporting periods and different definitions for the data elements. Options Return to the Participation Page Download Excel Version Out-of-State Peer Measures and Definitions Headcount Enrollment Headcount enrolled for credit, disaggregated by race/ethnicity. Angelo State University Master's Group Out-of-State Peers UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT SPRINGFIELD WESTERN NEW MEXICO UNIVERSITY Institution's Out-of-State Peers ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-WEST CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY-SAN MARCOS PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY Total 6,494 5,431 3,557 3,692 12,154 27,696 White 3,490 3, ,976 4,017 16,493 African American Hispanic 1, , ,703 2,664 Asian ,208 2,188 Other 521 1, ,819 5,465 Full-Time Equivalent Enrollment Full-time equivalent for the institution. The full-time equivalent of part-time enrollment is estimated by multiplying the part-time enrollment by factors that vary by control and level of institution and level of student. Total 5,666 3,844 2,505 3,268 10,892 21,396 Enrollment Detail - Angelo State University Participation By 2015, close the gaps in participation rates across Texas to add 630,000 more students. By Level, Age: Total 7,114 1, ,343 By Level, Race/Ethnicity: Total 7,114 1, ,343 By Level, Gender: Age Group Undergraduate Master's Doctor's Research/ Professional Post- Scholarship Specialty Baccalaureate Total Under 18 1, , to 21 3, , to , to to and over Ethnicity Undergraduate Master's Doctor's Research/ Professional Post- Scholarship Specialty Baccalaureate Total White 3, ,549 African American Hispanic 2, ,517 Asian International Other Doctor's Research/ Professional Post- Gender Undergraduate Master's Total Scholarship Specialty Baccalaureate Male 3, ,520 Accountability System, January of 23

5 Female 3, ,823 Total 7,114 1, ,343 By Undergraduate Status: Undergraduate Full-time Part-time White African American Hispanic Asian Other Male Female First-Time in College 1,351 1, First-Time Transfer (from two- and four-year institutions) Other Undergraduate 5,308 2,990 2,327 2, , ,348 2,969 Total 7,114 4,710 2,416 3, , ,150 3,976 Enrollment Detail - Angelo State University Participation By 2015, close the gaps in participation rates across Texas to add 630,000 more students. Lower-Division SCH Upper Division SCH Undergraduate SCH Master's SCH Doctor's Research/ Scholarship SCH Professional Specialty SCH Optometry SCH Total SCH Total 61,318 20,873 82,191 8, ,726 6,274 State-Funded 59,837 19,041 78,878 8, ,413 6,053 Distance Education Semester Credit Hours Hybrid/Blended on campus Fully-distance education/internet Lower-Division SCH Upper Division SCH Undergraduate SCH Master's SCH Doctor's Research/ Scholarship SCH Professional Specialty SCH Optometry SCH Total SCH , FTSE FTSE Accountability System, January of 23

6 Success - Key Measures Graduation Rate: 4-, 5-, and 6-Year 9. First-time, full-time entering, degree-seeking, students enrolled in a minimum of 12 SCH their first fall semester who have graduated from the same institution or another Texas public or independent institution. FY 2000 FY 2013 FY 2014 Point Change Entering Entering Entering Entering FY Fall Cohort Rate Fall Cohort Rate Fall Cohort Rate Fall Cohort Rate 2000 to Cohort Cohort Cohort Cohort 4-Year graduation rate , % , % , % , % 11.8 Same institution 15.3% 19.8% 22.7% 26.2% 10.9 Other TX institutions 2.3% 2.7% 2.5% 3.2% Year graduation rate , % , % , % , % 2.3 Same institution 26.7% 26.4% 32.1% 33.5% 6.8 Other TX institutions 9.5% 7.5% 6.1% 5.0% Year graduation rate , % , % , % , % 4.3 Same institution 30.6% 29.5% 30.8% 36.6% 6.0 Other TX institutions 10.0% 9.7% 10.4% 8.4% For more information on the 6-year graduation rate, see: Source: CBM001,CBM002, and CBM009 During FY11, ASU implemented a variety of best-practices academic retention initiatives to address the 4-year graduation rate and to bolster the 5th and 6th year rates. Recently, ASU has implemented a ""15 is the new 12"" campaign to help encourage on-time graduation. This year, ASU experienced its highest rates in recent years. Degrees and certificates awarded 10. Number of degrees and certificates awarded. FY 2000 FY 2014 % Change FY 2000 to Total Degrees* 964 1,371 1, % White % African American % Hispanic % Asian % International % Other % Institutional Gaps Target- Gaps Completion Level Associates 55 N/A N/A % 0 N/A Baccalaureate 786 1,031 1, % 1, % Master's % Doctor's Research/Scholarship N/A N/A N/A N/A % Doctor's Professional Practice N/A N/A Certificates Upper-level certificates N/A N/A N/A N/A Post-baccalaureate certificates N/A 3 N/A N/A *Hispanic students, except international ones, are counted as Hispanic. Students who are "Multi-Racial one of which is African American" are included with the African American students. Asian includes Asian, Hawaiian, and Pacific Islanders. "Other" includes American Indian, Alaskan Native, Unknown, and two or more races, excluding African American. International students are shown as a separate category. Accountability System, January of 23

7 Gender Male % Female % Source: CBM009 Source: CBM009 While the number of degrees awarded has increased nominally since 2000, gains in Hispanic and African-American graduates are especially positive. 11. Undergraduate degrees to at-risk students FY 2000 FY 2014 Change FY 2000 to Undergraduate Degrees to At-Risk Students Gaps Critical Fields: STEM Awards 12. Degrees awarded in STEM fields. FY 2000 FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change FY 2000 to Institutional Gaps Target- * Gaps Completion* Computer Science* % % Engineering* N/A 0 N/A Math* % % Physical Science* % % Level Associate's N/A Baccalaureate % % Master's N/A Doctor's Research/Scholarship N/A * Includes baccalaureate and associate degrees. A new degree program in computer gaming has had a positive impact on degrees awarded in Computer Science in FY12 and will continue to do so over the next 2 to 3 years. ASU also trains more math students than many larger state institutions. Nursing and Allied Health 13. Degrees and certificates awarded in nursing. FY 2000 FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change FY 2000 to Institutional Gaps Target- * Gaps Completion* Total Nursing Degrees % Certificate N/A Associates % Baccalaureate % % Master's % Doctor's Research/Scholarship N/A Doctor's Professional Practice N/A * Includes baccalaureate and associate degrees and certificates. 14. Degrees and certificates awarded in allied health. Accountability System, January of 23

8 FY 2000 FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change FY 2000 to Institutional Gaps Target- * Gaps Completion* Total Allied Health Degrees % Certificate N/A Associates N/A Baccalaureate % 30 20% Master's N/A Doctor's Research/Scholarship N/A Doctor's Professional Practice N/A * Includes baccalaureate and associate degrees and certificates. The Nursing Department's online programs continue to be highly successful. Teacher Production and Certification 15. Students taking and passing the certification exams for teacher education. FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 Total number taking exam Race/Ethnicity White African American * * 11 Hispanic Other * * Gender Male Female Total percent passing exam 94.0% 91.0% 91.0% Race/Ethnicity White 96.0% 91.0% 95.0% African American 86.0% 90.0% 62.0% Hispanic 88.0% 92.0% 82.0% Other 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Gender Male 90.0% 74.0% 88.0% Female 95.0% 94.0% 91.0% Note: The data for teacher production and certification was provided by SBEC. In some cases, the sum of the categories does not add up to the total. Numbers less than 10 in a category are suppressed. Data for the most recent year shown may be incomplete. Traditionally, ASU maintains a high pass rate in teacher certification of 95% or higher in all race/ethnic groups and in both genders. Graduation and Persistence Rate: 6-Year 16. First-time, full-time students enrolled in a minimum of 12 SCH their first fall semester who have graduated or are still enrolled at the same institution or another Texas public or independent institution. FY 2000 FY 2013 FY 2014 Point Change Entering Entering Entering Entering FY Fall Cohort Rate Fall Cohort Rate Fall Cohort Rate Fall Cohort Rate 2000 to Cohort Cohort Cohort Cohort Total , % , % , % , % Same institution 36.6% 33.2% 34.3% 39.9% 3.3 Other TX institutions 18.7% 17.8% 19.7% 14.9% White % % % % Same institution 38.3% 37.5% 39.7% 42.4% 4.1 Other TX institutions 20.4% 19.0% 19.1% 15.2% African American % % % % 13.2 Same institution 26.4% 24.2% 18.5% 30.7% 4.3 Other TX institutions 9.4% 18.8% 26.5% 18.3% 8.9 Hispanic % % % % 3.5 Same institution 33.2% 26.4% 28.2% 37.8% 4.6 Other TX institutions 15.1% 15.0% 18.5% 13.9% Asian % % % % Same institution 37.5% 33.3% 41.7% 36.0% Other TX institutions 12.5% 8.3% 20.8% 8.0% Other % % % % 40.0 Same institution 10.0% 11.1% 40.0% 50.0% 40.0 Other TX institutions 0.0% 11.1% 13.3% 0.0% 0.0 For more information on the 6-year graduation rate, see: Accountability System, January of 23

9 Source: CBM001, CBM002 and CBM009 The 6-year graduation rate for Hispanic students has seen significant increases. Success - Contextual Measures Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Point Change 17. Enrollment: Percent of first-time students 19 and under 94.0% 98.2% 97.4% 3.4 Fall 2000 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Point Change Fall Financial Aid: Percent of students receiving Pell Grants 34.1% 42.1% 41.4% 7.3 Fall 2000 Fall 2014 Point Change 19. Part-time first-time, degree seeking, undergraduates 4.0% 2.3% 0.9% Persistence rate of first-time, degree-seeking undergraduates: One-Year Entering Cohort Fall 2000 Entering Cohort Fall 2013 Entering Cohort Fall 2014 Point Change Fall 2014 Cohort Rate Cohort Rate Cohort Rate Total 1, % 1, % 1, % 1.5 Same institution 57.4% 62.0% 62.1% 4.7 Other TX institutions 18.4% 16.9% 15.3% White % % % 2.0 Same institution 59.4% 63.5% 67.3% 7.9 Other TX institutions 19.2% 17.1% 13.4% African American % % % Same institution 50.7% 61.3% 48.2% Other TX institutions 20.5% 13.4% 20.1% Hispanic % % % 7.9 Same institution 53.6% 58.8% 58.4% 4.8 Other TX institutions 14.5% 18.6% 17.6% 3.1 Asian % % % 13.2 Same institution 50.0% 57.1% 69.2% 19.2 Other TX institutions 21.4% 0.0% 15.4% Other % % % 19.8 Same institution 30.0% 81.5% 64.2% 34.2 Other TX institutions 20.0% 7.4% 5.7% Persistence rate of first-time, degree-seeking undergraduates: Two-Year Entering Cohort Fall 2000 Entering Cohort Fall 2012 Entering Cohort Fall 2013 Point Change Fall 2013 Cohort Rate Cohort Rate Cohort Rate Total 1, % 1, % 1, % 0.2 Same institution 46.3% 43.4% 48.9% 2.6 Other TX institutions 23.2% 20.5% 20.8% White % % % 3.3 Same institution 47.2% 46.6% 53.2% 6.0 Other TX institutions 23.7% 21.4% 21.1% African American % % % Same institution 37.0% 32.5% 37.3% 0.3 Other TX institutions 27.4% 27.2% 23.9% Hispanic % % % Same institution 46.8% 42.5% 44.9% Accountability System, January of 23

10 Other TX institutions 20.9% 17.5% 20.5% Asian % % % Same institution 50.0% 44.4% 57.1% 7.1 Other TX institutions 21.4% 22.2% 0.0% Other % % % 65.2 Same institution 10.0% 45.2% 77.8% 67.8 Other TX institutions 10.0% 9.7% 7.4% Developmental Education Fall 2011 Cohort 22. The percent of underprepared and prepared students who successfully complete a college-level course in math, reading and writing. Prepared students are given 1 year. Underprepared students are given 3 years. Total/Area Counts (a) Summary Data Number of FTIC students 1,457 Met state standards in all three areas 1,144 Did not meet state standards in one, two, or all three areas (at entry) 298 Unknown* (unduplicated) 15 Received credit pre-matriculation (b) College level course completion (grade A, B, or C) (c) College level course completion (grade A, B, C) including pre-matriculation credit (percent of total) (b+c)/(a) Data by Subject Area Met Standard Math 1, % Reading 1, % Writing 1, % Did Not Meet Standard Math 158 N/A % Reading 136 N/A % Writing 159 N/A % Unknown** (waived or military exemption) Math** 15 N/A % Reading** 15 N/A % Writing** 15 N/A % Most- and Least-Prepared Populations Met State Standard in All Three Areas Math 1, % Reading 1, % Writing 1, % Did Not Meet Standard in All Three Areas Math 33 N/A % Reading 33 N/A % Writing 33 N/A % The data for this accountability measure is tracked for one year for students who met TSI and for one, two, and three years for students who did not meet TSI for this report. *The Unknown (unduplicated) category does not include students who are unknown in some areas and not met in others. **Unknowns by area include students with waivers or exemptions who have not been reported as meeting TSI on a performance measure; FTIC students with waivers or military exemptions who were reported as meeting TSI in all areas based on performance measures are included in the "met state standards in all areas" category. 23. Underprepared students who satisfied TSI obligation within 2 years. Total/Area Counts (a) Summary Data Number of FTIC students 1,457 Met state standards in all three 1,144 areas Did not meet state standards in one, two, or all three areas (at 298 entry) Unknown* (unduplicated) 15 Number attempting developmental education (b) Percent attempting developmental education (includes DevEd interventions) (b/a) Fall 2011 Cohort TSI obligations met (of those attempting developmental education) (d) TSI obligations met through any means (of total) (e) TSI obligations met (percent of those attempting developmental education) (d/b) TSI obligations met (percent of total as reported by institution) (e/a) TSI obligations met based on TSI reporting or passed 1st college-level course (percent of total) (e) and/or Passed /(a) Data by Subject Area Met Standard Math 1, % N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Reading 1, % N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Writing 1, % N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Did Not Meet Standard Math % % 44.9% 44.9% Reading % % 70.6% 70.6% Writing % % 66.0% 66.0% Accountability System, January of 23

11 Unknown** (waived or military exemption) Math** % N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Reading** % N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Writing** % N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Most- and Least-Prepared Populations Met state standards in all areas Math 1, % N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Reading 1, % N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Writing 1, % N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Did Not Meet Standards in All Three Areas Math % % 30.3% 30.3% Reading % % 69.7% 69.7% Writing % % 66.7% 66.7% *The Unknown (unduplicated) category does not include students who are unknown in some areas and not met in others. **Unknowns by area include students with waivers or exemptions who have not been reported as meeting TSI on a performance measure; FTIC students with waivers or military exemptions who were reported as meeting TSI in all areas based on performance measures are included in the "met state standards in all areas" category. Passed is the number of students who passed a first college-level course as shown on measure # Percent of students who return the following fall. Total (a) Fall 2011 Cohort Number returning (Fall 2012) (b) Percent returning (Fall 2012) (b/a) Summary Data Number of FTIC students 1,457 1, Met state standards in all areas 1, % Did not meet state standards in one, two, or all three areas % Did not meet state standards in all three areas % Unknown* (unduplicated) % Data by Subject Area Met Standard by Area Math 1, % Reading 1, % Writing 1, % Did Not Meet Standard by Area Math % Reading % Writing % Unknown** by Area (waived or military exemption) Math % Reading % Writing % *The Unknown (unduplicated) category does not include students who are unknown in some areas and not met in others. **Unknowns by area include students with waivers or exemptions who have not been reported as meeting TSI on a performance measure; FTIC students with waivers or military exemptions who were reported as meeting TSI in all areas based on performance measures are included in the "met state standards in all areas" category. FY 2000 FY 2014 Point Change FY 2000 to 25. Graduation of two-year college students 1-29 SCH (before transfer) 30 ( 29.7%) 52 ( 39.4%) 40 ( 34.2%) SCH or more (before transfer) 89 ( 44.7%) 98 ( 40.2%) 113 ( 45.7%) 1.0 Source: CBM001 and CBM Percentage of baccalaureate graduates by SCH completed at two-year colleges: 1-29 SCH (at any time) 27.4% 47.0% 44.1% SCH or more (at any time) 15.6% 21.5% 21.5% 5.9 Source: CBM001 and CBM009. Cohort Rate Cohort Rate Cohort Rate 27. Graduation Rates Master's Fall % Fall % Fall % Doctoral Fall 1990 N/A Fall 2004 N/A Fall 2005 N/A Baccalaureate graduate success FY 2011 FY 2013 FY 2014 Point Change FY 2011 to FY 2014 Accountability System, January of 23

12 28. Percent of baccalaureate graduates who are employed or enrolled in a Texas graduate program or professional school Baccalaureate Graduates Employment/Enrollment Status 29. Employed in 4th quarter in which program year ends 30. In graduate or professional school in Texas in fall of the next FY 31. Employed in Texas and enrolled in a graduate or professional school in Texas 82.8% 83.3% 82.8% 0.0 FY 2011 FY 2013 FY 2014 Point Change FY 2011 to FY % 64.7% 65.3% % 6.8% 6.7% % 11.7% 10.9% 0.5 For more detailed information on enrollments and employment of graduates and other leavers, go to: ASU has performed well in this area and continues to strive for greater success through program review. 32. Undergraduate efficiency ratio Ratio of Undergraduate FTSE to Undergraduate Baccalaureate Degrees Awarded Fall 2000 FTSE/ FY 2001 UG Degrees Fall 2013 FTSE/ FY 2014 UG Degrees Fall 2014 FTSE/ UG Degrees N/A A majority of ASU students persist after the first year either at ASU or at a transfer institution. Before students withdraw, advisors and faculty seek to counsel students and to gain a better understanding of how ASU can help them in their academic endeavors. Accountability System, January of 23

13 Accountability System, January of 23

14 Graduation Rate: Four, five, and six-year graduation rates of first-time, full-time degree seeking undergraduates. Angelo State University Master's Group Out-of-State Peers UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT SPRINGFIELD WESTERN NEW MEXICO UNIVERSITY Institution's Out-of-State Peers ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-WEST CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY-SAN MARCOS PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY 4-Year Rate 14% 33.0% 7.0% 42.0% 12.0% 17.0% 5-Year Rate 25% 45.0% 18.0% 56.0% 39.0% 33.0% 6-Year Rate 30% 49.0% 22.0% 59.0% 49.0% 42.0% Degrees Awarded: Number of graduates by level, race/ethnicity and gender. Total Degrees 1,447 1, ,050 2,626 6,627 Level Gender White ,173 4,504 African American Hispanic Asian Other ,297 Associates Bachelors 1, ,441 4,375 Master's ,579 Doctor's Research/Scholarship Doctor's Professional Practice Male ,826 Female ,688 3,801 Graduation Rate: Percent of first-time, degree-seeking undergraduates who have graduated after six academic years. Total 30.0% 49.0% 21.0% 59.0% 49.0% 42.0% White 33.0% 57.0% 20.0% 64.0% 49.0% 40.0% African American 19.0% 41.0% 24.0% 43.0% 37.0% 32.0% Hispanic 25.0% 24.0% 21.0% 53.0% 47.0% 45.0% Asian 31.0% 13.0% 20.0% 66.0% 53.0% 49.0% American Indian or Alaska Native 13.0% 0.0% 0.0% 45.0% 43.0% 29.0% Unknown 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 55.0% 50.0% 44.0% Nonresident Alien 100.0% 33.0% 33.0% 67.0% 45.0% 53.0% Graduates in Key Fields: Number of degrees awarded in specific fields by level. Computer Science Engineering Math Physical Science Nursing and Allied-Health Graduates: Number of degrees awarded in nursing/allied-health by level. Total Degrees Certificate Associates Bachelors Master's Doctor's Research/Scholarship Accountability System, January of 23

15 Graduates Detail ( )- Angelo State University Success By 2015, increase by 50 percent the number of degrees, certificates, and other identifiable student successes from high quality programs. By Level, Race/Ethnicity: Race/Ethnicity Doctor's Doctor's Associate's Bachelor's Master's Research/ Professional Total Scholarship Practice White African American Hispanic Asian International Other Accountability System, January of 23

16 Excellence - Key Measures Faculty Teaching Fall 2000 Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Point Change Fall Tenured/tenure-track faculty teaching lower-division SCH 60.5% 60.2% 59.6% Recruitment and retention of qualified tenured/tenure-track faculty remains a challenge at a remote, regional institution. Student/Faculty Ratio 34. Full-time student equivalents (FTSE) divided by full-time equivalent (FTE) faculty. FTSE Fall 2000 FTFE Ratio FTSE Fall 2013 FTFE Ratio FTSE Fall 2014 FTFE Ratio % Change Fall 2000 to Fall 2014 FTSE/FTFE Ratio 5, :1 5, :1 5, :1-16.6% ASU believes its student/faculty ratio is optimal and will endeavor to keep it between 19.0 and State and National Exams Success 35. Certification and licensure rates FY 2000 FY 2014 Point Change FY 2012 to Law N/A N/A N/A N/A Pharmacy N/A N/A N/A N/A Nursing 91.0% 92.0% 88.0% 1.0 Engineering N/A N/A N/A N/A The Nursing Department strives for a high pass rate and is currently reviewing curriculum and degree programs to identify any changes necessary to maintain and/or increase current rates. Tenured/Tenure-Track FTE Faculty Fall 2000 Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Point Change Fall Percent of FTE teaching faculty who are tenured/tenure-track 64.0% 64.7% 64.6% 0.6 Recruitment and retention of qualified tenured/tenure-track faculty remain challenges at a remote, regional institution. Quality Enhancement Plan 37. Quality Enhancement Plan, Including Reaffirmation Year In 2011, Angelo State University, SACSCOC reaffirmation class of 2013,selected ""Community Pathways to Learning"" (working title) as the topic for its QEP. In 2012, the title was changed to ""CONNECT! Campus and Community: Enhancing Student Learning Through Community Engagement"". This reinforces the university's commitment to higher learning and community engagement by providing curricular and co-curricular CONNECTIONS that enable students and the community to come together in mutually beneficial ways. CONNECT! also serves as the name ascribed to various activities that students, faculty, staff, and community partners implement to impact student learning and the community positively. These CONNECTIONS generally fall into one of three pedagogical categories: a) Service-learning, b) Internships and other community-based practica, and c) Community-based research. CONNECT! activities will be embedded into the curriculum and supported by a variety of co-curricular activities. All will be tracked and assessed, but the direct measurement of student learling will be emphasized. ASU's QEP has not yet been approved by SACSCOC. Excellent Programs 38. Excellent Programs Highlighted Excellent Programs 1 Nursing Programs, including AA, RN to BSN, and LVN to RN transition degrees. The nursing degree programs are widely recognized for mobility options available to students. The programs continue to enjoy increased enrollment in strong online programs allowing working LVNs and RNs to continue their education while maintaining employment. The Department implemented both the generic baccaulaureate and FNP in FY 11. Additionally, the department has a 100% pass rate for APN certification. Highlighted Excellent Programs 2 The Department of Teacher Education prepares teachers for elementary and middle schools of Texas. The program of teacher Accountability System, January of 23

17 preparation has received national recognition from the Association of Childhood Education International as a result of completing requirements for national accreditation by the National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Preparation. On State examinations, the department has a pass rate in excess of 95%. Graduates are highly sought after and are highly successful teachers. Excellence - Contextual Measures Fall 2000 Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Point Change Fall FTE tenured/tenure-track faculty demographics Ethnicity Total 64.0% 64.7% 64.6%* 0.6 White 62.4% 64.6% 62.6% 0.2 African American 75.5% 81.0% 81.8% 6.3 Hispanic 62.0% 49.5% 58.2% Asian 100.0% 75.5% 87.7% International N/A 0.0% 0.0% N/A Other 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0 Gender Male 74.3% 73.4% 74.4% 0.1 Female 48.7% 53.6% 52.8% 4.1 *Hispanic faculty members, except international ones, are counted as Hispanic. Faculty who are "Multi-Racial one of which is African American" are included with the African American faculty. Asian includes Asian, Hawaiian, and Pacific Islanders. "Other" includes American Indian, Alaskan Native, Unknown, and two or more races, excluding African American. International faculty are shown as a separate category. Faculty Rank Teaching Assistants Other Faculty Instructor Assistant Professor Associate Professor Professor 40. Faculty Rank (Fall 2014) Faculty Ethnicity Total* White African American Hispanic Asian International Other Faculty Gender Male Female *Hispanic faculty members, except international ones, are counted as Hispanic. Faculty who are "Multi-Racial one of which is African American" are included with the African American faculty. Asian includes Asian, Hawaiian, and Pacific Islanders. "Other" includes American Indian, Alaskan Native, Unknown, and two or more races, excluding African American. International faculty are shown as a separate category. Faculty Salary by Rank FY 2002 FY 2014 % Change FY 2002 to National Average () % National Average 41. Faculty Salary Comparisons Professor $64,627 $77,029 $78, % $117,155 67% Associate Professor $54,655 $65,659 $64, % $83,243 78% Assistant Professor $46,805 $60,391 $60, % $71,840 84% Instructor $0 $0 N/A $49,231 0% Fall 2000 Fall 2014 %/Point Change 42. Endowed Professorships and Chairs 0 N/A Percent unfilled N/A N/A N/A N/A Percent of total tenured/tenure-track faculty N/A N/A N/A N/A 43. Nobel Prize Winners and National Academies FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change FY 2013 to 44. Other Faculty Awards Accountability System, January of 23

18 FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change FY 2013 to FY 2015 Successful placement of baccalaureate graduates remains high. Tenure/Tenure-Track Faculty Percentage of all full-time faculty members who are tenured or tenure-track. Percent of Tenured/Tenure-Track faculty Angelo State University Master's Group Out-of-State Peers UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT SPRINGFIELD WESTERN NEW MEXICO UNIVERSITY Institution's Out-of-State Peers ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-WEST CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY-SAN MARCOS PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY 72% 78% 86% 59% 77% 70% Accountability System, January of 23

19 Research - Key Measures Federal and Private Research FY 2001 FY 2014 % Change FY 2001 to 45. Federal and private research expenditures per FTE faculty $1,174 $1,861 $1, % Research Expenditures 46. Research expenditures ($ Million) FY 2001 FY 2014 % Change FY 2001 to Institutional Gaps Target- Gaps Completion $0.643 $0.951 $ % $ % Sponsored Research Funds FY 2011 FY 2014 Point Change FY 2011 to 47. Federal and private (sponsored) research funds per revenue appropriations. 1.3% 0.9% 0.9% Source: THECB Annual Research Expenditures Report and Sources & Uses Source: THECB Annual Research Expenditures Report and Sources & Uses ASU's main strength is in its dedication to undergraduate education. Research - Contextual Measures FY 2001 FY 2014 % Change FY 2001 to 48. Research Expenditures by Source ($ Millions) $0.643 $0.951 $ % Federal $0.111 $0.203 $ % State $0.466 $0.603 $ % Private $0.066 $0.145 $ % Institutional $0.000 $0.000 $0.003 N/A Restricted Research Expenditures (amount shown is a subset of the categories above) $0.530 $0.164 $ % For information on restricted research expenditures, go to FY 2009 FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change FY 2009 to 49. Faculty holding extramural research grants Number 20 N/A N/A N/A N/A Percent 6.4% N/A N/A N/A N/A Patents 50. Number of new U.S. patents issued or reissued. FY 2001 FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change FY 2001 to 0 N/A N/A Accountability System, January of 23

20 51. Number of new patent applications 0 N/A N/A This year, two faculty and one student filed ASU's first patent application and have received the provisional patent for new cloud computing technology. Research Expenditures Current year research expenditures. Research Expenditures Angelo State University Master's Group Out-of-State Peers UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT SPRINGFIELD WESTERN NEW MEXICO UNIVERSITY Institution's Out-of-State Peers ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-WEST CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY-SAN MARCOS PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY $1,027,210 $1,963,774 $205,480 N/A $748,951 $51,011,577 Research Funds Amount of sponsored (external/federal) research funds. Federal Research Funds $4,340,747 $2,954,612 $800,331 N/A $- $44,774,144 Source: IPEDS Fall 2014 Accountability System, January of 23

21 Institutional Efficiency and Effectiveness - Key Measures Administrative Cost FY 2000 FY 2014 Point Change FY 2000 to 52. Administrative costs as a percent of operating budget 10.1% 9.2% 8.9% ASU's administrative structure is lean. Given an annual budget that is small in comparison to other state institutions, the percent spent on administrative costs may appear disproportionately large. Recent academic and administrative restructuring has had a positive effect on the percentage of administrative costs. Space Usage Efficiency (SUE) 53. Space usage efficiency measure of the effectiveness and efficiency of existing teaching space utilization. Classroom and lab passing score is 75 and overall passing score is 150. Fall 2014 Classroom space use efficiency Lab space use efficiency Overall space use efficiency ASU will improve its classroom space use efficiency by increasing the number of afternoon and evening course offerings and by modifying facilities. Appropriated Funds per FTE Faculty 54. State appropriations divided by full-time equivalent students and annual full-time equivalent teaching faculty. FY 2001 FY 2014 % Change FY 2001 to Appropriated funds per FTE student $5,610 $7,113 $6, % Appropriated funds per FTE faculty $65,337 $67,067 $64, % Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) FY 2000 FY 2014 %/Point Change FY 2000 to 55. HUB Expenditures without construction (Millions) $ $ $ % Percent of total expenditures 8.2% 7.3% 7.4% HUB Expenditures with construction (Millions) $ $ $ % Percent of total expenditures 14.4% 8.6% 9.4% Angelo State University has aggressively pursued Historically Underutilized Business bids during the past several years, resulting in significant growth of expenditures from that catagory of vendors. Operating Expenses per FTE Student FY 2001 FY 2014 % Change FY 2001 to 56. Operating expenses per FTE student $9,959 $15,350 $15, % Total Revenue per FTE Student and FTE teaching Faculty FY 2000 FY 2014 % Change FY 2000 to 57. Total revenue Per FTE student $9,739 $18,220 $19, % Per FTE faculty $118,080 $171,800 $183, % A portion of increased revenues is being committed to the expansion and development of recruitment and retention initiatives. Institutional Efficiency and Effectiveness - Contextual Measures Accountability System, January of 23

22 Class Size Fall 2000 Fall 2014 %/Point Change 58. Average class size % Median class size % 59. Percentage of undergraduate classes with less than 20 students 60. Percentage of undergraduate classes with 50 students or more 22.2% 26.9% 28.4% % 7.6% 6.4% Through a small reduction in average class size, ASU is providing for increased levels of contact between students and faculty, thus supporting student retention. FY 2000 FY 2016 % Change FY 2000 to FY Average cost of resident undergraduate tuition and fees for 30 SCH. $2,560 $7,642 $7, % Fall 2000 Fall 2014 % Change 62. E&G Square footage E&G classroom per FTE student % E&G lab per FTE student % Endowment 63. True and Term Endowment ($ millions) 64. Quasi Endowment ($ millions) 65. Total Endowment ($ millions) 66. Total Endowment - Per FTE student FY 2011 FY 2013 FY 2014 % Change FY 2011 to $108.0 N/A N/A N/A $5.0 N/A N/A N/A $113.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A $20,068 N/A N/A N/A % FY 2001 FY 2014 % Change FY 2001 to 67. Total Revenue* $56,483,569 $100,090,891 $105,448, % State appropriations $31,853,942 $39,073,368 $36,846, % Tuition and fees $12,414,984 $30,735,695 $31,368, % Federal grants and contracts $5,331,494 $13,624,656 $12,799, % Institutional resources $6,883,149 $16,657,172 $24,434, % Constitutional funds $3,887,211 $3,743,027 $3,743, % Total Revenue with Constitutional Funds $60,370,780 $103,833,918 $109,191, % *Does not include Constitutional Funds Link to additional information: Despite the rising cost of education, ASU remains among the most affordable of state four-year institutions, despite recent tuition increases. Administrative Cost Ratio Amount expended for administrative costs as a percent of operative expenses Administrative costs as a percent of operating budget Angelo State University Master's Group Out-of-State Peers UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT SPRINGFIELD WESTERN NEW MEXICO UNIVERSITY Institution's Out-of-State Peers ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-WEST CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY-SAN MARCOS PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY 7% 6% 6% N/A 7% 5% Accountability System, January of 23

23 Appropriations State and local government appropriation revenues per FTE student. Appropriations per FTE student $5,847 $4,923 $8,194 $3,811 $6,452 $2,774 Expenditures Instruction expenses per FTE student. Instruction expenses per FTE student $7,413 $10,299 $8,111 $8,436 $8,347 $8,454 Tuition and Fees Tuition and Fee revenue per FTE student. Tuition and Fee Revenue per FTE student $6,349 $6,750 $3,374 $10,868 $7,383 $8,488 Accountability System, January of 23