Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Academic Affairs and Research Division

Transcription

1

2

3 Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Academic Affairs and Research Division Report of the Institutional Effectiveness Information and Data Review of Instructional Programs in Workforce Education offered by Collin County Community College District Cycle 4, Year (7 8) Statutory Authority Texas Education Code, Section 6.5(e), Texas Senate Bill 64 adopted in June 993 for the purpose of assuring continuous improvement of Texas public community and technical colleges, accountability for expenditures of public higher education funds; and quality and responsiveness of public community and technical colleges to the educational needs of the people of Texas. The Institutional Effectiveness Review Instrument The institutional effectiveness instrument was revised to comply with new requirements established by Governor Perry s Executive Order RP 3 issued on January, 4, requiring the Coordinating Board and each institution and system work together to provide the information necessary to determine the effectiveness and quality of the education students receive at individual institutions, also to provide the basis to evaluate the institutions use of state resources, and to meet new accountability requirements in the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 6. The Carl D. Perkins Measures have been separated. Critical Success Factors For the general academic and two-year institutions there are five categories of accountability measures: Participation, Success, Excellence, Research, and Institutional Effectiveness and Efficiencies. The Academic Affairs and Research Division staff have reviewed the critical success factors where there is a standard available. However, data in the general review instrument where there is no standard has been included for your information. I. Participation II. Excellence III. Quality of workforce education programs Each workforce education program was assigned a status recommendation based on the review (see Table II). The Annual Data Profile facilitated the review process by providing certified data previously submitted to the Coordinating Board (CB) by Collin County Community College District.

4 I. Participation a. Course completion: The percentage of contact hours completed must not be more than five percentage points below the state average. The college met the standard for course completion. Technical Contact Hours Completed Institution s Average State Average 88% 89% b. Completion and persistence: Percent of first-time, full-time and part-time technical credential-seeking undergraduates. The percentage of credentialseeking undergraduates who have graduated or are still enrolled in Texas public and private higher education after six academic years is no more than five percentage points below the state average. In fiscal year 5, the college did not meet the standard for completion and persistence rates. The percentage of part-time credential-seeking undergraduates who have graduated or are still enrolled in Texas public and private higher education after six academic years is greater than five percentage points below the state average. Institution s Average FY Cohort State Average Full-time 5.6% 8.7% Part-time.7% 6.89% Recommendation : Collin County Community College District should implement strategies to meet or exceed the state standard for the completion of part-time credential-seeking undergraduates. c. Completion rates: Three-, four-, and six-year technical completion rate. The completion rate of first-time credentialing seeking undergraduates must not be more than five percentage points below the state average. The college did not meet the standard in this area. In fiscal year 5, the full-time three-year state average and the part-time six-year state average were not met. FY5 Full- Time Part- Time 3-Year Cohort Institution s Average State Average 4-Year Cohort Institution s Average State Average 6-Year 999 Cohort Institution s Average State Average.% 7.98% 9.59% 3.9% 9.7% 9.95% 8.33% 8.88%.98%.% 3.3% 9.96% Recommendation : Collin County Community College District should identify and implement strategies to ensure meeting or exceeding state averages.

5 d. Placement of Graduates: Graduate status in the fourth quarter of the calendar year in which the fiscal year of graduation ends. The overall placement of all workforce education programs must be at least 85 percent as calculated over three years (except new programs which received CB approval or were first offered within the last three years). The college met the standard because it placed 9.86 percent of its graduates Overall graduates ,49,37 Overall % found 88.84% 94.83% 94.89% 9.86% II. Excellence a. Programs whose graduates are required to pass a licensure exam to practice in the field. Ninety percent pass rate or greater for three consecutive years is required. The college did not meet the standard for the following programs. Information used to rate this measure came from the 6 THECB Licensure report and data supplied by your institution. Program FY 4 FY 5 FY Deaf Interpreter 83.33% 5.% 5.% 43.7 Criminal Justice/Police Science 66.67%.% 5.% 5.94 Emergency Medical Technology 5.% 76.9% 77.48% 5.98 Respiratory Care Therapy.%.% 95.% 5.6 Nursing 87.5% 79.66% 98.8% Recommendation 3: Collin County Community College District should identify and implement strategies to ensure meeting or exceeding the state standard. III. Quality of Workforce Education Programs a. Number of degree and certificate awards over a three-year. The total number of degrees and certificates awarded by each program over a three-year will generate at least 5 awards (except new programs which received CB approval or were first offered within the last three years). The college did not meet the standard for number of degree and certificate awards. The following programs did not generate 5 or more degree and certificate awards over a three-year. Number of Program Degree and Certificate Awards in Three Years.3 Graphic Communications 4. Computer Programming Criminal Justice/Police Science 5.48 Interior Design Emergency Medical Technology (EMT Paramedic) 4 3

6 Recommendation 4: Collin County Community College District should identify and implement strategies to ensure that 9 percent or more of all active programs (except new programs approved by the CB for implementation on or after September, 4) generate 5 or more degree and certificate awards over a three-year to be consistent and in compliance with the established standard. b. Percent of graduates placed within in the fourth quarter of the calendar year in which the fiscal year of graduation ends (a three-year average). At least 85 percent of workforce education programs must place 85 percent or more of their completers within one year of completion. Overall, the college did not meet the standard for placement of program completers in this area. The following program did not place 85 percent of their completers within one year of completion. Percentage of Completers Program Placed Within One Year (Three-Year Average) 43.7 Criminal Justice/Police Science.% Recommendation 5: Collin County Community College District should develop and implement strategies to meet or exceed the state standard in this program. c. License/Credential Exam Pass Rate: Ninety percent or more of the students who take license/credential exams must pass. The college did not meet the standard for licensure/credential exam pass rate. The following information was reported to the CB by the institution. Percentage of Program Students Passing (6) 6.6 American Sign Language 5.% 5.94 Emergency Medical Technology (EMT Paramedic) 77.48% Recommendation 6: Collin County Community College District should identify and implement strategies designed to ensure that 9 percent or more of the students tested on a specific license/credential exam pass the exam as reported for the most recent year for which data are available. Program-Specific Findings The program-specific findings are based on the measures and standards that all community and technical colleges in Texas are required to meet. A rating of each measure indicates whether the college meets the standard. Each umbrella program and each award (A.A.S. degree or certificate) received one of the following status recommendations. EP Exemplary Program. Program meets all and exceeds most standards and is considered a model program. 4

7 Continue the Program. Program meets all standards. CI Continue the Program with Improvement. Some standards are not met. Progress toward meeting standards must be made to bring the program into compliance. CR Continue the Program with Revision. Plans for formal program revision must be filed with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board within three months of the date of this report. This status is recommended for programs that should be revised for reasons indicated on the instrument. DE Deactivation. Program does not meet most standards and must suspend enrollment while concerns are addressed. The college must submit deactivation forms to the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board within three months of the date of this report. CL Closure. Program must be removed from inventory within three months of the date of this report. Students currently enrolled may be taught out. The college must submit closure forms to the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board within three months of the date of this report. Of the 3 umbrella programs reviewed at Collin County Community College District, 4 were recommended the status "," four were recommended the status "CI," one was recommended the status CL, and one was recommended the status DE. Table II describes the recommended status of each award and umbrella program. See attached review rating. Follow-Up Procedures (Due March 3, 9) The response to this report should be brief and specific and should follow the format outlined in the attached sample response (see Table III).. Submit the college s plan for addressing the recommendations noted in the General Observations section.. Submit program revision forms to close the program for the program(s) and/or award(s) identified as DE or CL. 3. No response is required for the program(s) and/or award(s) identified as "" and "CI." 5

8 Table I Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board DESK REVIEW REPORT - WORKFORCE EDUCATION PROGRAMS State-Wide Institutional Effectiveness Evaluation System Beginning Cycle 4, Year 7-8 LLIN UNTY MMUNITY LLEGE DISTRICT Credentialing Exam Pass Rate 3 CIP Number of Awards Placement -Year Average Met State Standard * 4.% % -- * 4 9.9% % % -- e e % % % * 5.% % % % * * 94.9% X % 95.56% X %.% X c 3 c.% % -- * 3.% % %.% X e e -- * % * 77.48% % 95.% X 5.99 e e % 98.8% X % % % % -- The standard is 5 degrees or award certficates within the three-year covered by this evaluation. The standard is placement of 85 percent of completers within one year of program completion. 3 The standard is a 9 percent pass rate for students who took the examination. * (s). + Does not meet two or more of the completion, placement, or credentialing exam pass rate standards. An improvement plan, program revision, or limited site visit is required. e Program is excluded if it is new (within last 3 years) and producing less than 5 completers or 9 percent placement. c Program is excluded if it is deactivated by college. p Program is excluded if it is taught only at a prison facility. /6/9

9 Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board DESK REVIEW REPORT - WORKFORCE EDUCATION PROGRAMS State-Wide Institutional Effectiveness Evaluation System Beginning Cycle 4, Year 7-8 LLIN UNTY MMUNITY LLEGE DISTRICT Credentialing Exam Pass Rate 3 CIP Number of Awards Placement -Year Average Met State Standard % -- * Overall (3) * 8.77% 96.5% * 75.% -- The standard is 5 degrees or award certficates within the three-year covered by this evaluation. The standard is placement of 85 percent of completers within one year of program completion. 3 The standard is a 9 percent pass rate for students who took the examination. * (s). + Does not meet two or more of the completion, placement, or credentialing exam pass rate standards. An improvement plan, program revision, or limited site visit is required. e Program is excluded if it is new (within last 3 years) and producing less than 5 completers or 9 percent placement. c Program is excluded if it is deactivated by college. p Program is excluded if it is taught only at a prison facility. /6/9

10 LLIN UNTY MMUNITY LLEGE DISTRICT SUMMARY OF PROGRAM SPECIFIC RESPONSES TABLE II Desk Review Date: //8 REVIEW PROGRAM CIP NAME CIP AWARD RATING 6.6 AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE 6.63 AAS INTERPRETER PREPARATION PROGRAM/DEAF CI INTERPRETER TRAINEE CERTIFICATE CI Number of Awards for CIP: BIOLOGY TECHNICIAN/BIOTECHNOLOGY LABORATORY TE 4. AAS BIOTECHNOLOGY BIOTECHNOLOGY CERTIFICATE Number of Awards for CIP: BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, MANAGEMENT AND OPERAT 5. AAS BUSINESS MANAGEMENT (TP) AAS BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-CRIMINAL JUSTICE SPECIALIZATION BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATE BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-CRIMINAL JUSTICE SPECIALIZATION BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT SP BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-QUALITY MANAGEMENT SPECIALIZATI DE UNTRYWIDE MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT CERTIFICATE HARLEY-DAVIDSON FINANCIAL SERVICES (HDFS) BUSINESS MGT MEDIATION SPECIALIZATION CERTIFICATE DE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATE DE Number of Awards for CIP: BUSINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT AND ASSISTANT SERVIC 5.4 AAS OFFICE SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY (TP) LEGAL OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIZATION (TP) MEDICAL OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIZATION (TP) OFFICE SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY CERTIFICATE (TP) 5.47 (5.73) MEDICAL DING AND BILLING SPECIALIZATION DE AAS (5.4) AAS OFFICE SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY (TP) DE Number of Awards for CIP: OVERALL /6/9

11 REVIEW PROGRAM CIP NAME CIP AWARD RATING. MPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCES, GENERAL. AAS MPUTER APPLICATIONS SPECIALIZATION (TP) AAS MPUTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS (TP) APPLICATIONS PROGRAMMING CERTIFICATE MPUTER APPLICATIONS CERTIFICATE Number of Awards for CIP:. 4. MPUTER PROGRAMMING. AAS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT (TP) CI AAS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT - JAVA SPECIALIZATION (TP) AAS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT - VISUAL BASIC.NET SPECIALIZATIO DATABASE PROGRAMMING - C# SPECIALIZATION (TP) DATABASE PROGRAMMING - C++ SPECIALIZATION (TP) DE DATABASE PROGRAMMING CERTIFICATE (TP) CI SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT - C# SPECIALIZATION (TP) SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT - JAVA SPECIALIZATION CI SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT - VISUAL BASIC.NET SPECIALIZATION CI SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT CERTIFICATE (TP) CI Number of Awards for CIP:..8 MPUTER SOFTWARE AND MEDIA APPLICATIONS.8 AAS E-BUSINESS MEDIA (TP) AAS WEB DEVELOPER SPECIALIZATION (TP) E-BUSINESS MEDIA CERTIFICATE (TP) E-MMERCE CERTIFICATE WEB DEVELOPER SPECIALIZATION (TP) Number of Awards for CIP:.8 5 OVERALL CI /6/9

12 REVIEW PROGRAM CIP NAME CIP AWARD RATING.9 MPUTER SYSTEMS NETWORKING AND TELEMMUNIC.9 AAS CIS SYSTEMS NETWORKING SPECIALIZATION (TP) AAS MPUTER NETWORKING TECHNOLOGY (TP) ADVANCED CIS SYSTEMS NETWORKING (CCNP) CERTIFICATE ( MPUTER NETWORKING TECHNOLOGY ADVANCED SOFTWARE MPUTER NETWORKING TECHNOLOGY SOFTWARE (MCSA) CER Number of Awards for CIP:.9 5. MPUTER/INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ADMINISTRATIO.3 AAS INFORMATION SYSTEMS CYBERSECURITY INFORMATION SYSTEMS CYBERSECURITY CERTIFICATE Number of Awards for CIP: CRIMINAL JUSTICE/POLICE SCIENCE 43.7 BASIC PEACE OFFICER CI Number of Awards for CIP: DENTAL SUPPORT SERVICES AND ALLIED PROFESSIONS 5.6 AAS DENTAL HYGIENIST Number of Awards for CIP: DESIGN AND APPLIED ARTS 5.4 AAS APPLIED GRAPHIC DESIGN TECHNOLOGY AAS MMERCIAL PHOTOGRAPHY SPECIALIZATION APPLIED GRAPHIC DESIGN TECHNOLOGY CERTIFICATE MMERCIAL PHOTOGRAPHY CERTIFICATE Number of Awards for CIP: OVERALL CI /6/9

13 REVIEW PROGRAM CIP NAME CIP AWARD RATING 5.3 DRAFTING/DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES/TECHNI 5.3 AAS MPUTER-AIDED DRAFTING & DESIGN (TP) AAS INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DESIGN & LAYOUT SPECIALIZATION AUTOCAD SPECIALIZATION (TP) MPUTER-AIDED DRAFTING & DESIGN CERTIFICATE (TP) CERT3 ENHANCED SKILLS CERTIFICATE MPUTER AIDED DRAFTING & INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DESIGN & LAYOUT CERTIFICATE (TP) 5.35 AAS ELECTRONIC DESIGN (TP) ELECTRONIC DESIGN AUTOMATION CERTIFICATE (TP) Number of Awards for CIP: ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING TECHNOLO 5.33 AAS BIOMEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION ELECTRONIC SPECIALIZATION ( AAS ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY (TP) AAS ELECTRO-OPTICAL SPECIALIZATION (TP) AAS SEMINDUCTOR MANUFACTURING BIOMEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION ELECTRONIC SPECIALIZATION ( ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY CERTIFICATE (TP) ELECTRO-OPTICAL SPECIALIZATION (TP) SEMINDUCTOR MANUFACTURING OPERATOR CERTIFICATE (T 5.35 AAS NVERGENCE TECHNOLOGY (TP) NVERGENCE TECHNOLOGY CERTIFICATE (TP) ELECTRONIC MMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY CERTIFICATE (TP CERT3 ENHANCED SKILLS CERTIFICATE VOICE-OVER-IP EXPERT IP SPECIALIZATION CERTIFICATE (TP) Number of Awards for CIP: ELECTRICAL/ELECTRONICS MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR T 47. AAS ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY (TP) DE Number of Awards for CIP: 47. OVERALL DE /6/9

14 PROGRAM CIP NAME CIP AWARD 5.94 EMERGENCY MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY/TECHNICIAN (EMT P 5.94 AAS EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES PROFESSIONS EMS PARAMEDIC CERTIFICATE Number of Awards for CIP: FIRE PROTECTION 43. AAS BASIC FIREFIGHTER CERTIFICATION SPECIALIZATION AAS FIRE OFFICER CERTIFICATION SPECIALIZATION AAS FIRE SCIENCE FIRE OFFICER CERTIFICATE Number of Awards for CIP: FIRE SCIENCE/FIREFIGHTING 43.3 BASIC FIREFIGHTER CERTIFICATE Number of Awards for CIP: GENERAL SALES, MERCHANDISING AND RELATED MARKE 5.8 AAS INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS SPECIALIZATION (TP) AAS MARKETING (TP) AAS MARKETING / BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SPECIALIZATION (TP) INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS SPECIALIZATION (TP) MARKETING CERTIFICATE (TP) SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SPECIALIZATION Number of Awards for CIP: GRAPHIC MMUNICATIONS.34 3-D ANIMATION/GAME ART & ANIMATION CERTIFICATE 3D ENTERTAINMENT ANIMATION/INTERACTIVE MEDIA SPECIALI AAS 3-D ANIMATION/GAME ART AND ANIMATION AAS WEB-INTERACTIVE MEDIA/DIGITAL VIDEO SPECIALIZATION WEB-INTERACTIVE MEDIA/DIGITAL VIDEO CERTIFICATE Number of Awards for CIP:.3 5 REVIEW RATING CI CI DE DE CI DE CI CI OVERALL CI CI /6/9

15 PROGRAM CIP NAME CIP AWARD 5.7 HEALTH AND MEDICAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 5.77 AAS HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 5.78 MEDICAL TRANSCRIPTION CERTIFICATE 5.73 MEDICAL DING AND BILLING CERTIFICATE Number of Awards for CIP: HOSPITALITY ADMINISTRATION/MANAGEMENT 5.9 AAS CULINARY ARTS SPECIALIZATION (TP) AAS HOTEL/RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT (TP) CATERING MANAGEMENT SPECIALIZATION (TP) CULINARY ARTS SPECIALIZATION (TP) DIETARY MANAGER SPECIALIZATION (TP) HOTEL MANAGEMENT SPECIALIZATION (TP) HOTEL/RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATE MEETINGS & EVENT MANAGEMENT SPECIALIZATION (TP) PASTRY ARTS SPECIALIZATION CERTIFICATE (TP) Number of Awards for CIP: HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, FAMILY STUDIES, AND RELATED 9.76 AAS CHILD DEVELOPMENT (TP) CHILD DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATE CERTIFICATE (TP) CHILD DEVELOPMENT CERTIFICATE (TP) 9.79 EARLY CHILDHOOD ADMINISTRATOR SPECIALIZATION (TP) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATOR SPECIALIZATION (TP) INFANT AND TODDLER EDUCATOR SPECIALIZATION (TP) SCHOOL-AGE EDUCATOR SPECIALIZATION CERTIFICATE (TP) TEACHER ASSISTANT SPECIALIZATION (TP) Number of Awards for CIP: INTERIOR DESIGN 5.48 AAS INTERIOR & ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN (TP) INTERIOR & ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CERTIFICATE (TP) Number of Awards for CIP: 5.48 REVIEW RATING CI CI OVERALL CI /6/9

16 PROGRAM CIP NAME CIP AWARD.3 LEGAL SUPPORT SERVICES.3 AAS PARALEGAL/LEGAL ASSISTANT PARALEGAL GENERAL CERTIFICATE Number of Awards for CIP: MUSIC 5.9 AUDIO ENGINEERING CERTIFICATE 5.99 AAS MUSIC, MMERCIAL Number of Awards for CIP: NURSING 5.6 AAS NURSING Number of Awards for CIP: REAL ESTATE 5.5 AAS REAL ESTATE REAL ESTATE BROKERS CERTIFICATE REAL ESTATE GENERAL CERTIFICATE Number of Awards for CIP: RESPIRATORY CARE THERAPY/THERAPIST 5.98 AAS RESPIRATORY CARE Number of Awards for CIP: SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY/TECHNOLOGIST 5.99 AAS SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY Number of Awards for CIP: 5.99 Number of Umbrella Programs: 3 Number of Awards: REVIEW RATING 4 OVERALL /6/9

17 EXAMPLE EXAMPLE TABLE III RESPONSE TO CTC DESK REVIEW REPORT LLIN UNTY MMUNITY LLEGE DISTRICT GENERAL OBSERVATIONS Recommendation : College should ensure that the Math Department develops a tracking system to document the success of students enrolled in developmental math courses as soon as possible. Recommendation : College should review all publications for required nondiscrimination statements and make appropriate changes. Response (must be brief and include specifics on how and when college will implement recommendation) SPSS software has been purchased and training obtained by the IE office. Data entry will begin immediately so that by May 9 a comprehensive study of developmental education effectiveness may be completed and an improvement plan based on tracking data devised. All of the college's publications have been reviewed for required nondiscrimination statements. The nondiscrimination statement has been added to the publications that were found not to be incompliance. PROGRAM-SPECIFIC REMMENDATIONS (CR, DE, or CL) Program: Horticulture Science.6 Recommended Status: CR Response Department will develop a plan to increase enrollment by percent beginning September, 9. A new advisory committee will be formed by September, 9. The following new facilities/equipment will be made available to program by September, 9. Program: Agricultural Business.4 Recommended Status: DE Deactivation forms are enclosed. Program: Precision Metal Workers 48.5 Recommended Status: CL Closure forms are enclosed. Note: No response required for programs with recommended status of and CI.

18 INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES AND STANDARDS DESK REVIEW LLIN UNTY MMUNITY LLEGE DISTRICT Desk Review Date: //8 I. PARTICIPATION A. Measure: Annual Unduplicated Enrollment Including Credit, Non-Credit, and Dual Credit Students Academic* % Change Fall Fall 5 Fall 6 Fall - Fall 6 5,559 3,64 4, % 6, %, %, % 55.83% Male 8, % 3, % 3, % 54.3% Female,53 74.% 6, % 6,4 68.8% 4.4% White %, %, % 3.93% African-American, 6.5%,8 8.94%, % 3.86% Hispanic,9 7.65%, %,3 8.78% 85.97% Asian 9.58% 4.6% 57.6% 7.53% Native American %,5 4.5%, 4.9%.% International 7.% Unknown.%.% 7.% Technical Fall Fall 5 Fall 6 8,798 9,573 9,5 3,54 893,36, % 49.7%.3%.% 5,853 5,74 7,599 8,54 7.3%, % 88.83%, %,468.7% % 5.7% 7.88% 5.56%.8% 9.6%.76%.87%.39% 7,565 8,49, ,77, % 5.86% 69.8% 6.3%.86% 9.6%.76%.6%.39% % Change Fall - Fall 6-6.4% -.98% Male -.66% Female -9.83% White 7.84% African-American -6.6% Hispanic -4.6% Asian -6.3% Native American -5.% International 7.% Unknown Source: CBM and CBMA; *Academic data for institutional reference only B. Measure: Annual Credit Hours and Contact Hours: Annual Number of Undergraduate Semester Credit Hours and Contact Hours for Credit Programs and Annual Contact Hours for Continuing Education Programs % Change FY FY 5 FY 6 FY - FY 6 54,43,65 54,43 359,474 3, , ,887 39,4 367, % 55.67% -.8% Semester Credit Hours (SCH) Academic Technical 5,97,77 4,344,86,54,784 58,7 7,8,5 6,333, ,464 54,885 7,968,754 6,59,66 93,6 58, % 49.8% -.8% 4.9% Contact Hours Academic Technical Continuing Education Source: CBM4 and CBMC

19 INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES AND STANDARDS DESK REVIEW LLIN UNTY MMUNITY LLEGE DISTRICT I. PARTICIPATION - NTEXTUAL VARIABLES A. Measure: Financial Aid: Annual Percentage of Credit Students Receiving Pell Grants by Gender and Ethnicity Academic* FY % 4 4.% % % % 6.76%.3%.% 3 3.% % FY % % 9.3% 36.38% 8.69% 6 8.% 9.9% % 8.6% % Change FY - FY 6 FY % 96.53% % 48.55% White % 4.5% African-American 96.34% % Hispanic 45.79% % Asian % 33.33% Native American 3.84%,.% International.%.% Unknown % 36.8% Male 6.9% 87.79% Female Technical FY % 9 4.% 7 5.5% 9.65% 6.3% 5.74%.%.% % 6 6.9% FY % 8.95% % % 4 8.7%.%.%.% % 3.96% % Change FY - FY 6 FY % 5.86% 6.48% 48.6% White % 66.67% African-American 36 6.% 63.64% Hispanic 5.7% 5.% Asian %.% Native American.% -.% International.%.% Unknown % 48.98% Male % 5.59% Female Source: CBM and Financial Aid Database System; *Academic data for institutional reference only

20 INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES AND STANDARDS DESK REVIEW LLIN UNTY MMUNITY LLEGE DISTRICT 3 B. Measure: Full-Time/Part-Time Undergraduate Students: Number and Percent of Credential-Seeking Students Academic - Full-Time* % Change Technical - Full-Time % Change Fall Fall 5 Fall 6 Fall - Fall 6 Fall Fall 5 Fall 6 Fall - Fall 6 3,383 5,749 5, % %,644,779, % % Male,739,97, % % Female,49 4,43 4,9 64.9% % White % % African-American % % Hispanic % 89.47% 5.38% %.% 8.89% Asian Native American International 4 4.%.% Unknown Academic - Part-Time* % Change Technical - Part-Time % Change Fall Fall 5 Fall 6 Fall - Fall 6 Fall Fall 5 Fall 6 Fall - Fall 6 4,465 8,95 8,4 88.7%,996,539,95 -.5%,834 3,365 3, % % Male,63 4,73 4, %,7 968,59 7.5% Female 3, , , %.43% 78.3% 4.7% 85.9% % 4.%, , , % 48.6% 5.76%.76% -7.65% % 3 3.% White African-American Hispanic Asian Native American International Unknown Source: CBM; *Academic data for institutional reference only C. Measure: Non-Funded and Non-Reported Community College Activities: FY 6 FY 7 Enrollment: Contact : Enrollment: Contact : a) Contract training: Number of enrollments and number of contact hours for a fiscal year b) Adult Basic Education: Number of individuals enrolled as reported by institutions' ACES to TEA. The number of individuals enrolled in adult education program that is reported to TEA. Does not include ESL courses offered to adult/older students c) Alternative Certification: Number of enrollments and contact hours d) GED: Number who enrolled, number who took the test, and number who passed the test. As there may be a difference in defining of the fiscal year between agencies, include the number of students that were reported for the requested Tested Passed Tested Passed Source: Institutions

21 INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES AND STANDARDS DESK REVIEW LLIN UNTY MMUNITY LLEGE DISTRICT 4 II. A. SUCCESS Measure: Course Completion Standard: Percentage of contact hours completed is not more than five (5) percentage points below the state average X Meets standard Acad Tech (SCH),78,8 366,576 Contact hours on official census date,9,96 34,76 Contact hours at end of reporting 79% 8% 88% 89% Percent of contact hours completed State average - Percent of contact hours completed Source: CBM4, CBM6, CBMC

22 INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES AND STANDARDS DESK REVIEW LLIN UNTY MMUNITY LLEGE DISTRICT 5 B. Measure: Completion and Persistence: Percent of First-Time, Full- Time and Part-Time Credential-Seeking Undergraduates Standard: Percentage of credential-seeking undergraduates who have graduated or are still enrolled in Texas public and private higher education after six academic years is no more than five (5) percentage points below the state average Academic - Full-Time*: FY 3 FY 4 FY 5 (Entering % % 4.3%.4% 8.6% 3.8% 47.% 8.8%.%.% (Entering 998 Cohort) % Academic - Part -Time*: 3.87% 38.3% 35.9% 3.77% 35.7% 44.44% 8.33% 6.67%.% (Entering 999 Cohort) % 9.87% 36.6% 34.97% 9.8%.98% 45.6% 5.%.%.%,955.3% 4, % 5,7.73% Technical - Full-Time: FY 3 FY 4 FY 5 (Entering % % 6.4% 4.3%.83% 7.4% 4.9%.%.%.% (Entering 998 Cohort) % % 8.89% 9.49%.77% 3.43% 8.%.%.%.% (Entering 999 Cohort) %.9% 8.84% 6.89% 7.65% 7.65% 7.3% 6.67% 33.33%.% 6,56 8.4% 7, % 8,75 8.7% Technical - Part -Time: Male Female White African-American Hispanic Asian Native American International Unknown State Average % % % % 5 4.9% 4 3.% 3.7% 78.74% 7.8% %.% % 8.5% % 9.5% % 4.6% % 9.55% Male Female % % % % 6 9.3% 5 6.% 4.7% 9 9.8%.9% 5.8% % 7.54% 3 7.7%.%.% 6.%.% 5.%.%.%.%,58 9.6%, % 4,593.7% % 4.7%.% 8.57% 33.33%.%.% %.64% 8.96% 5.38%.%.%.% ,5 4.7% 5,96 5.9% 7,6 6.89% 9.6% White.9% African-American.76% Hispanic 6.% Asian 6.67% Native American.% International.% Unknown State Average % Meets standard X Source: CBM, CBM, and CBM9; *Academic data for institutional reference only

23 INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES AND STANDARDS DESK REVIEW LLIN UNTY MMUNITY LLEGE DISTRICT 6 C. Measure: Completion Rate: Three, Four, and Six-Year Completion Rate Standard: Three, four, and six-year completion rate of first-time credentialseeking undergraduates is not more than five (5) percentage points below the state average FY 3 Entering Fall Cohort ,3 Rate 7.78%.3% 6.89%.6% 9.% Entering Fall Cohort ,4 Rate 3-Year academic graduation rate ()* %.%.76%.3% 97.% FY %.3% 8.37%.5% 9.86% 3.53%.3%.96%.34% 96.47% FY 5 Entering Fall Cohort Source: CBM, CMB, and CBM9; *Academic data for institutional reference only 85 7, Rate.36%.6% 9.63%.67% 89.64% 33,79 9.5% 37,69 9.8% 37, % 4.59%.3% 3.78%.57% 95.4% 35, % 38, % 35, % 4-Year academic graduation rate ()* % % % %.5%.39% 85.86% 6.57%.57% 4.%.% 93.43% 67 9, % 9.6%.67% 85.5% 5.88%.74% 3.8%.3% 94.% , %.67%.89% 84.54% 3, % 33, % 37,69 6.4% 7.5%.68% 6.37%.46% 9.49% 33,7 7.7% 35,38 7.4% 38, % 6-Year academic graduation rate ()* %.% 7.6%.98% 7.% %.%.99%.65% 65.8% % 3.9% 9.6%.3% 67.9% 3, % 3, % 3, % % 3.6% 4.5%.43% 8.48% % 7.8% 8.9%.45% 8.66% % 5.7% 6.9%.% 86.% 33,383.46% 3, % 33,7 6.73% Full-Time Baccalaureate or above Associate Certificate No Award Statewide Average Part-Time Baccalaureate or above Associate Certificate No Award Statewide Average Full-Time Baccalaureate or above Associate Certificate No Award Statewide Average Part-Time Baccalaureate or above Associate Certificate No Award Statewide Average Full-Time Baccalaureate or above Associate Certificate No Award Statewide Average Part-Time Baccalaureate or above Associate Certificate No Award Statewide Average

24 INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES AND STANDARDS DESK REVIEW LLIN UNTY MMUNITY LLEGE DISTRICT 7 C. Measure: Completion Rate: Three, Four, and Six-Year Completion Rate Standard: Three, four, and six-year completion rate of first-time credentialseeking undergraduates is not more than five (5) percentage points below the state average FY 3 FY 4 FY 5 Entering Entering Entering Fall Cohort Rate Fall Cohort Rate Fall Cohort Rate 3-Year technical graduation rate () %.3% 5.3% 3.8% 9.77% 7.63%.4%.8% 6.43% 9.37% Full-Time 9 9.8%.% Baccalaureate or.3%.% above % 3.9% 9.7% % 4.65% 87.79% Associate Certificate No Award,3 7.94%,79 9.3%, % Statewide Average Part-Time %.%.84% 6.9% 9.4% %.%.5% 7.8% 9.67% 3,78 7.5%, % 4, % 4-Year technical graduation rate () Baccalaureate or above Associate Certificate No Award Statewide Average 999 Full-Time 67.7% % % Baccalaureate or 7.97% 6.97% 5 5.5% above %.75% 88.9% % 3.8% 85.3% % 3.9% 8.4% Associate Certificate No Award 9,996.59%,3.85%,79 3.9% Statewide Average Part-Time %.67%.88% 3.77% 9.68% %.4%.6% 8.3% 89.96% %.9% 3.69% 7.37% 88.% 5,7.4% 3,78.53%,93.% 6-Year technical graduation rate () % 6.54%.%.6% 79.74% % 6.54% 9.69%.5% 74.74% % 9.58% 7.69%.45% 7.8% 7, 8.% 8,8 3.7% 9, % 7.35% 4.59% 5.6% 7.4% 8.65% % 4.73% 5.% 3.98% 86.7% % 3.77% 5.% 4.43% 86.7% 8, % 9,86 9.4% 5,7 9.96% Baccalaureate or above Associate Certificate No Award Statewide Average Full-Time Baccalaureate or above Associate Certificate No Award Statewide Average Part-Time Baccalaureate or above Associate Certificate No Award Statewide Average Source: CBM, CMB, and CBM9

25 INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES AND STANDARDS DESK REVIEW LLIN UNTY MMUNITY LLEGE DISTRICT 8 D. Measure: Number of Associate Degrees, Certificates by Type, Core Completers, and Field of Study Completers by Gender and Ethnicity Academic* FY 4 FY 5 FY 6 Technical FY 4 FY 5 FY 6 Ethnicity: Ethnicity: % % 68 7.% % % % White 4 6.9% % % % % % African-American % 4.75%.89% 5.5% % 4.3%.3% 7.% % 6.77%.3% 4.4% % 6.83%.55% 8.67% % 7.5%.74% 6.3% % 8.45%.6% 6.64% Hispanic Asian Native-American International.%.%.%.%.%.% Unknown Gender: % % % Gender: % % % Male % % % % % % Female Level: %.%.%.% %.%.%.% Level:.% 8.% 36.%.% 33.39% 66.6%.% % 6.4%.%.% % Associates 57.4% Certificate.% Certificate.% Adv. Tech. Certs. Other Completers: ESC Core Completers Field of Study Source: CBM9; *Academic data for institutional reference only E. Measure: Transfers: Percent of Students who Transfer to a Senior Institution Academic* : FY FY 5 FY % % % Technical : FY FY 5 FY % 7.% % Point Change FY - FY % Point Change FY - FY 6-4.9% Source: CBM; *Academic data for institutional reference only

26 INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES AND STANDARDS DESK REVIEW LLIN UNTY MMUNITY LLEGE DISTRICT 9 F-.Measure: Persistence Rate: First-Time Credential-Seeking Undergraduates Who Remain Enrolled At Your Institution or Another Texas Institution After One and Two Academic Years First-time academic undergraduate persistence rate after one year*: Entering Cohort Entering Cohort Entering Cohort Point Change Fall Fall 4 Fall 5 Fall - Fall 5, %, %,69 7.% -.85% %, %, %.9% Same institution % 9.78% 33.6% -.77% Other institutions,5 7.4%,4 69.6%,48 7.7% -.7% White % % %.65% Same institution % 46.76% 7.6% Other institutions -.35% African % % % -5.77% American % % % -.99% Same institution 5 3.8% 3.4% 3 9.3% -4.78% Other institutions % % % -.9% Hispanic 68 7.% 3 6.% % -8.7% Same institution.3% 5 7.8% 8.94% -.37% Other institutions % % %.% Asian % % % 4.4% Same institution 8.97% 4.76% 5.67% Other institutions -3.9% Native % 7.% 7.73% -.6% American % 6 6.% % -3.3% Same institution 6.67%.% % 9.7% Other institutions % % %.96% International % % % 5.49% Same institution %.8%.9% -3.53% Other institutions.%.%.%.% Other.%.%.%.% Same institution.%.%.%.% Other institutions % %, % -.33% Male % % %.76% Same institution % 89.63% 8.49% -.77% Other institutions % %, % -.45% Female 4 6.% % % -.% Same institution %.9% 5.3% -.46% Other institutions Source: CBM and CMB; *Academic data for institutional reference only

27 INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES AND STANDARDS DESK REVIEW LLIN UNTY MMUNITY LLEGE DISTRICT F-3.Measure: Persistence Rate: First-Time Credential-Seeking Undergraduates Who Remain Enrolled At Your Institution or Another Texas Institution After One and Two Academic Years First-time technical undergraduate persistence rate after one year: Entering Cohort Entering Cohort Entering Cohort Point Change Fall Fall 4 Fall 5 Fall - Fall % % % -4.59% % % %.3% Same institution % 5 9.9% % -6.89% Other institutions 63.64% 8.95% % 3.3% Hispanic % % 55.56%.% Same institution 9.9% 3 4.9%.%.% Other institutions % 7 8.% % -3.3% White % % % 4.9% Same institution % 9.4% 9.48% Other institutions -7.5% African % % % -3.56% American 6 75.% % % -36.% Same institution.% 6.67% 5.56% 5.56% Other institutions.% % 6.%.% Asian.% % 6.%.% Same institution.%.%.% Other institutions.% Native-.%.%.%.% American.%.%.%.% Same institution.%.%.%.% Other institutions.% % 5 6.% -4.% International.% 66.67% 3 6.% -4.% Same institution.%.%.%.% Other institutions.%.%.%.% Other.%.%.%.% Same institution.%.%.%.% Other institutions % % % 4.9% Male % % 5 6.% 5.56% Same institution %.66% 7 8.4% -6.89% Other institutions % % % -4.7% Female 5 6.8% % % -.8% Same institution.76% 5 5.8% % -.9% Other institutions Source: CBM and CMB

28 INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES AND STANDARDS DESK REVIEW LLIN UNTY MMUNITY LLEGE DISTRICT F-.Measure: Persistence Rate: First-Time Credential-Seeking Undergraduates Who Remain Enrolled At Your Institution or Another Texas Institution After One and Two Academic Years First-time academic undergraduate persistence rate after two years*: Entering Cohort Entering Cohort Entering Cohort Point Change Fall Fall 3 Fall 4 Fall - Fall 4, %, %, % -.49% % % %.88% Same institution % % 4 4.9% -.38% Other institutions, %, %,37 59.% -.95% White % % %.6% Same institution % % % Other institutions -.% African % % 7 6.%.3% American % % % -6.6% Same institution 4.% 7.4% % 6.9% Other institutions % % % -9.86% Hispanic 4 44.% % % -.9% Same institution 4 5.6% 8 8.9% % -7.96% Other institutions % % % -.86% Asian % % % -8.6% Same institution % % % Other institutions -3.7% Native % % 5.% -6.67% American 3 5.% 3 3.8% 3 3.% -.% Same institution 6.67% %.% 3.33% Other institutions % 5.% %.3% International 3 4.8% 9 45.% % 9.3% Same institution % 5.% % -7.% Other institutions.%.%.%.% Other.%.%.%.% Same institution.%.%.%.% Other institutions % % % -.87% Male % % 9 35.%.6% Same institution % 9.9% 9.78% -.38% Other institutions % % % -.4% Female % % %.48% Same institution 8 8.7% 7 9.5% 3 5.7% -.9% Other institutions Source: CBM and CMB; *Academic data for institutional reference only

29 INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES AND STANDARDS DESK REVIEW LLIN UNTY MMUNITY LLEGE DISTRICT F-4.Measure: Persistence Rate: First-Time Credential-Seeking Undergraduates Who Remain Enrolled At Your Institution or Another Texas Institution After One and Two Academic Years First-time technical undergraduate persistence rate after two years: Entering Cohort Entering Cohort Entering Cohort Point Change Fall Fall 3 Fall 4 Fall - Fall % % %.5% % 8 8.3% % 4.5% Same institution 4 4.4% % 37.4% -.99% Other institutions 54.55% % 7.43% 6.88% Hispanic % 3 3.8% % -3.3% Same institution 8.8% 7.69% 8 38.% 9.9% Other institutions % 7.43% 7 64.% 3.58% White 5 34.% 8 6.8% % 7.67% Same institution 4 6.3% 6 5.6% 6.% Other institutions -4.9% African % 3.8% 5.% -3.33% American 33.33% 4 9.5% 6.67% -6.67% Same institution.% 4.76% 3.33% 3.33% Other institutions.% % % -4.9% Asian.%.% % -8.57% Same institution.%.% 4.9% Other institutions 4.9% Native-.%.%.%.% American.%.%.%.% Same institution.%.%.%.% Other institutions.%.% % % International.%.% 33.33% % Same institution.%.%.%.% Other institutions.%.%.%.% Other.%.%.%.% Same institution.%.%.%.% Other institutions % 65.% % -5.55% Male % % 5 3.5% -.46% Same institution 5 8.9% 4 6.5% 5.% -.99% Other institutions % % %.43% Female % 9.59% %.9% Same institution 7.48% % 7.% -.48% Other institutions Source: CBM and CMB

30 INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES AND STANDARDS DESK REVIEW LLIN UNTY MMUNITY LLEGE DISTRICT 3 G. Measure: Number of Degrees and Certificates Awarded in Closing the Gaps Critical Fields Academic* % Change FY FY 5 FY 6 FY - Fields: FY 6.%.%.%.% Computer Science.%.%.%.% Engineering.%.%.%.% Mathematics.%.%.%.% Physical Science Level:.%.%.%.% Associate.%.%.%.% Certificate.%.%.%.% Certificate Technical % Change FY FY 5 FY 6 FY - Fields: FY % % % 53.33% Computer Science 6.83% 3 3.3% 6 5.8% 45.45% Engineering.%.%.%.% Mathematics.%.%.%.% Physical Science Level: 6.83% % % 63.64% Associate % % %.% Certificate.%.%.%.% Certificate Source: CBM9; *Academic data for institutional reference only H. Measure: Number of Nursing and Allied Health Degrees and Certificates Awarded Academic* % Change FY FY 5 FY 6 FY - FY % 9.%.%.% -.% Associates.%.%.%.% Certificate.%.%.%.% Certificate.%.%.%.% Adv. Tech. Cert..% ESC.% Core Completers 4.% Field of Study Technical % Change FY FY 5 FY 6 FY - FY % % 85.% 83.% 5.35%.%.%.%.%.% 56.6% Associates -.% Certificate.% Certificate.%.%.%.%.%.%.% Adv. Tech. Cert. ESC Core Completers Field of Study Source: CBM9; *Academic data for institutional reference only

31 INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES AND STANDARDS DESK REVIEW LLIN UNTY MMUNITY LLEGE DISTRICT 4 I. Measure: Graduate Status in the 4th Quarter of the Calendar Year in which the Fiscal Year of Graduation Ends: Percent of Technical Graduates that are: Standard: 85 percent of all active workforce education programs place 85 percent of completers after six months as calculated over three (3) years (except new programs which received CB approval or were first offered within last three years) %.74% % 3.3% % 3.9% Employed only Employed and Enrolled 3.63% 5.3%.85% Enrolled in Senior Institution % % 9 6.7% Enrolled in Comm. College ,49,37 Graduates Overall % 88.84% 94.83% 94.89% 9.86% Found Source: CBM9, CBM, CB6, and UI Wage Records

32 INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES AND STANDARDS DESK REVIEW LLIN UNTY MMUNITY LLEGE DISTRICT 5 II. SUCCESS - NTEXTUAL VARIABLES A. Measure: Completers/Other Successes: Number of Marketable Skills Awards Academic* % ChaTechnical % Change FY FY 5 FY 6 FY FY FY 6 FY 5 FY 6 FY - FY 6 N/A N/A N/A 3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A White African-American Hispanic Asian Native-American International Unknown Gender Gender N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Male Female Source: CBMM; *Academic data for institutional ref B. Measure: Percent of Underprepared and Prepared Students Who Successfully Complete a Related College- Level Course Within Three Years if They Tested Above Deviation or Four Years if They Tested Under Deviation by Subject Areas Fall 3 Cohort Credit by Examination No. Attempting College Level Course % Attempting College Level Course College Level Course Completion (grad A, B, C) College Level Course Completion % of Those Attempting College Level College Level Course Completion % of Number of FTIC Students 3, Met State Standards in all Areas Math Reading Writing, % % 38.9%,53,9 95.% % 78.4%, % % 57.9% All Students in Developmental Education Math Reading Writing, % 6.5% 6.4% % % 56.7% % %.% Source: CBM

33 INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES AND STANDARDS DESK REVIEW LLIN UNTY MMUNITY LLEGE DISTRICT 6 C. Measure: Percent of Underprepared Students Who Satisfied TSI Obligation Within Two Years if They Tested Above Deviation or Three Years if They Tested Under Deviation by Subject Areas Fall 3 Cohort No. Attempting DE Hours % Attempting DE Hours TSI Obligations Met (of those attempting DE) TSI Obligations Met (of total) TSI Obligations Met (% of those attempting DE) TSI Obligations met (% of ) Number of FTIC Students 3, Met State Standards in all Areas Math Reading Writing All Students in Developmental Education,53 3 7%,53.%,53 6.% Math Reading Writing,34,8 88.% % 4.8% % % 5.% % % 9.% Source: CBM D. Measure: Percent of Underprepared and Prepared Students Who Return the Following Fall by Subject Areas Fall 3 Cohort Number Returning Fall 5 % Returning Fall 5 Number of FTIC Students 3, Met State Standards in all Areas Not Met State Standards In all 3 Areas Math Not Requiring DE Requiring DE Unknown/Not Tested Reading Not Requiring DE Requiring DE Unknown/Not Tested Writing Not Requiring DE Requiring DE Unknown/Not Tested, % % %, % % % % %, % % % Source: CBM and CBM

34 INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES AND STANDARDS DESK REVIEW LLIN UNTY MMUNITY LLEGE DISTRICT 7 III EXCELLENCE A. Measure: Programs Whose Graduates are Required to Pass a Licensure Exam to Practice in the Field Standard: 9% pass rate or greater for three consecutive years Criminal Justice/Police Science Deaf Interpreter Dental Support Services Emergency Medical Technology Fire Protection Fire Science/Firefighting Nursing Respiratory Care Therapy Pass Rates FY 4 FY 5 FY %.% 5.% 83.33% 5.% 5.%.%.%.% 5.% 76.9% 77.48%.% 95.65% 95.56% 98.6%.%.% 87.5% 79.66% 98.8%.%.% 95.% Meets standard X Source: Institutions B. Measure: Certification and Licensure: Licensure and Certification Rate on State or National Exams Certification and Licensure: Licensure and certification rate on state and national exams % Change Pass Rates FY 4 to FY 6 FY 4 FY 5 FY % 9.9% 89.3% -6.% Source: LBB

35 INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES AND STANDARDS DESK REVIEW LLIN UNTY MMUNITY LLEGE DISTRICT 8 IV. A. INSTITUTIONAL EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS Measure: Degrees and Certificates Awarded: Number of Workforce Education Program Degrees and Certificates Awarded over Three-Year Period Standard: The total number of degrees and certificates awarded over a three-year in the workforce education programs generate at least 5 awards over three-year (except new programs which received CB approval or were first offered within last three years) Number of Degree Awards Program Awards.3 Graphic Communications 3 4. Computer and Information Sciences, General. Computer Programming Computer Software and Media Applications.9 Computer Systems Networking and Telecommunications. Computer/Information Technology Administration and Management 5.3 Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technologies/Technicians 5.3 Drafting/Design Engineering Technologies/Technicians 6.6 American Sign Language Human Development, Family Studies, and Related Services.3 Legal Support Services Biology Technician/Biotechnology Laboratory Technician 43.7 Criminal Justice/Police Science 43. Fire Protection Fire Science/Firefighting Electrical/Electronics Maintenance and Repair Technology 5.4 Design and Applied Arts Interior Design Music Dental Support Services and Allied Professions 5.94 Emergency Medical 3 4 Technology/Technician (EMT Paramedic) 5.98 Respiratory Care Therapy/Therapist Surgical Technology/Technologist 5.6 Nursing Business Administration, Management and Operations 5.4 Business Operations Support and Assistant Services 5.9 Hospitality Administration/Management Real Estate General Sales, Merchandising and Related Marketing Operations Source: CBM9 X Meets standard Programs not meeting standard:.3 Graphic Communications. Computer Programming 43.7 Criminal Justice/Police Science 5.48 Interior Design 5.94 Emergency Medical Technology New programs:. Computer/Info. Tech. Adm Surgical Technology Closed program: 47. Electrical/Electronics Maintenance

36 INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES AND STANDARDS DESK REVIEW LLIN UNTY MMUNITY LLEGE DISTRICT 9 IV. INSTITUTIONAL EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS - NTEXTUAL VARIABLES A. Measure: Contact Hours: Percent of Contact Hours Taught in Semester Credit Courses by Instructors Classified as Full-Time and Part-Time Faculty Contact Hours Percent/Point Change Fall Fall 5 Fall 6 Fall - Fall 6 8: : :.53% FTE student/faculty ratio,98,99 3,6,3 3,45, % contact hours,5, %,77, %,87, % 56.96% Taught by full-time faculty,47, %,378, %,437, % 37.5% Taught by part-time faculty Full-Time Faculty Fall Fall 5 Fall 6 % Change Fall - Fall % % 5.6% 4.3%.94%.94%.47%.% % 5.59% 3.85%.4%.7%.%.% % 5.8% 3.88%.94%.65%.%.% 45.% 45.45% 33.33%.%.% -.%.% White African-American Hispanic Asian Native-American International Unknown Gender % 49.3% % 55.94% % 57.8%.% 68.57% Male Female Part-Time Faculty Fall Fall 5 Fall 6 % Change Fall - Fall % % % %.84% White.96% 3.68% 9 4.7% 9.% African-American % 4 4.% % 64.7% Hispanic 4.3% % 4 6.8% 9.9% Asian 3.59% 5.84% 5.8% 66.67% Native-American.%.%.33%.%.%.3% -.%.% International Unknown Gender % % % 6.7% Male % % % 5.8% Female Source: CBM4 and CBM8