3/6/2009. Residence Halls & Strategic t Planning Overview. Residence Halls Overview. Residence Halls: Marapai Supai Kachina

Transcription

1 Residence Halls & Strategic t Planning Overview District Governing Board Residence Halls Overview Residence Halls: Marapai Supai Kachina 1

2 Supai Hall Kachina Hall Marapai Hall Marapai Hall 1968 Total student occupancy: double occupancy rooms Wood frame and masonry 27,000 gross sf Supai Hall 1971 Total student occupancy: four person suites Wood frame and masonry 29,000 gross sf Kachina Hall 1993 Total student occupancy: double occupancy rooms Wood frame and masonry 25,936 gross sf Total Capacity: 372 Student Occupants 2.5 FTE Hall Directors The condition of Marapai and Supai Residence Halls requires total renovation or replacement Asbestos abatement: Gut the building New floor treatments New plumbing throughout New toilets, sinks, showers and cabinets New windows and doors New electrical and data Fire sprinkler system New roofs Replace exterior wood treatments with products with longer life and ease of maintenance Masonry repairs Sealing below grade Increase energy efficiency through addition of insulation in walls and ceilings New exterior and interior signage Multiple elevators to make buildings ADA compliant o Supai 3; Marapai 2) 2

3 Total Replacement $18M $300/sf) Renovation of existing 35+ year old shell Slightly cheaper/sf Demolition/Non Replacement Use of existing rental rooms off campus Savings in M&O Benefits of New Construction Existing Issues: Wood exterior has deteriorated beyond the ability to repair needs full replacement Failing masonry and foundations Can t increase insulation on building without re framing Structural issues causing constant leaks, settling Student complaints; Loss of revenue from rooms offline Opportunities: Create space that is more energy efficient, sustainable and more cost effective to maintain (HVAC and plumbing) Build a variety of floor plans to accommodate different users Opportunity to invest in a shell that will maximize return over time Create a smaller footprint freeing up land for parking and/or other use Supai Hall Kachina Hall Marapai Hall Residence Halls Demographics 3

4 Where Do Residence Hall Students Come From? 16% 13% Prescott Residents 13% 40% 18% Yavapai County Residents Out of County 4 Corners States Out of County Other Out of State 3% Student Housing Profile 53% 44% First Year Students Second Year Students Third Year Students % 34 % 21 % 1.2 % Ages of Students in the Residence Halls 4

5 Programs of Study Gen Ed/AGEC A: 103 Social Services: 63 Math/ Science: 46 Technical/Trades: 18 Liberal Arts: 11 Arts: 10 Physical Education: 6 Athletes: 90 (included in numbers listed above) Males Gender Females 52% 48% Residential Life & Student Development 1. Enhanced opportunities for student engagement Students at YC report living on campus affords them not only the ability to attend college, but feel a larger connection to academia than when they were commuting. 2. Retention and Graduation Students living on campus are more likely to persist and graduate than students who commute. (Pascarella and Terenzini, 2005, p. 421) 3. Values and Beliefs Living on campus positively effected increases in aesthetic, cultural and intellectual values. (Pascarella and Terenzini, 2005, p. 421) 4. Diversity Residence halls influence a positive shift toward more positive and inclusive racial ethnic attitudes and openness to diversity broadly defined. (Pascarella and Terenzini, 2005, p. 310) 5

6 Student Development Recruitment Athletics Public Safety Number of Available Room Rentals Off Campus Food Service Contract Relies on Residence Hall Meal Plans Factors to Consider Market Rate Comparison Campus Police Cost Savings Maintenance & Operations Utilities Staffing Students with vehicles 57% Strategic Planning: Allocation of Limited Resources Achieving Balance Long Term Sustainability What are the primary needs of populations being served? Lifelong Learner Traditional Student Online Student Re Entry Into the Workforce 6

7 How do Projects Align with the Core Mission of the Institution? Community College Strategic Planning Factors That Impact Decision Making: Economy: County, State and Federal Tax Base Revenues Human Resource Availability Alignment with Core Mission/YC Strategic Priorities Health and Safety Leadership Infrastructure Life Cycle Costs of Buildings and Equipment Workforce Training Needs Programs to Meet Market Demand Lifelong Learning Trends & Sustainable Programming Competition Plan for Future Growth A College Culture With The Ability To Respond to Change Trains Students for the Future Adjust to Shifts in the Economy Incorporates Technological Developments 7

8 Capital Projects Under Consideration 8

9 Existing Plant & Piping New Cooling Plant & Piping 9

10 10

11 Multi Purpose Field 11

12 Tennis Courts Verde Valley Campus Phase I (1975, 1983) Phase II (1987, 1990) Phase III (2004, 2006) 12

13 13

14 Building E Building J Building D Building B + C Building A 14

15 15

16 16

17 17

18 18

19 Move Administration & Student Activities Adjacent to Student Services Re Define Entry Move 2D and 3D Arts to a Location Where it Can Expand 19

20 20

21 What is the Next Step? Gather more data to refine the analysis Prioritize options Refine Costs Determine Funding Availability Schedule Projects Prescott Campus & District Offices 21

22 Verde Valley Campus Chino Valley Campus CTEC Campus 22

23 Prescott Valley Campus YC + Library Building Sedona Campus 23

24 YAVAPAI COLLEGE SITES 24