Columbia-Greene Community College Institutional Assessment Plan
|
|
- Shauna Gibbs
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Columbia-Greene Community College Institutional Assessment Plan (updated August 2015) I. Vision Statement... 1 II. Introduction... 1 III. Assessment Committees... 2 A. Institutional Assessment Planning Group (IAPG)... 2 B. Strategic Planning Committee (SPC)... 3 C. Academic Assessment Committee (AAC)... 3 D. Non-Academic Assessment Committee (NAC)... 4 IV. Assessment Process... 4 A. Institutional Effectiveness Strategic Planning Integration of Planning and Assessment Resource Allocation (Budget) Related to Planning and Assessment... 5 B. Learning Outcomes General Education Assessment Program Level Assessment Course Level Assessment... 6 V. Integrated Strategic Planning, Assessment, and Budgeting Timeline... 7 V1. Assessing Assessment... 7 Appendices Appendix 1: Institutional Effectiveness Report Card Template Appendix 2: Strategic Plan Appendix 3: Academic Assessment Plan Appendix 4: Non-Academic Assessment Plan Appendix 5: Budget Justification Worksheet Appendix 6: Assessment of the Major Data List
2 I. Vision Statement Institutional Effectiveness at Columbia-Greene Community College is accomplished through a comprehensive and on-going process of active assessment of all operational areas of the College. II. Introduction The Institutional Assessment Plan (IAP) describes the mechanisms the College uses to assess the institution as a whole and its component programs, courses, and services with emphasis on the support of student learning. The Middle States Commission on Higher Education s Standards for Accreditation and Requirements of Affiliation (2015) defines academic and institutional assessment: Educational Effectiveness Assessment (Standard 5): Assessment of student learning and achievement demonstrates that the institution's students have accomplished educational goals consistent with their program of study, degree level, the institution's mission, and appropriate expectations for institutions of higher education. Planning, Resources, and Institutional Improvement (Standard 6): The institution s planning processes, resources, and structures are aligned with each other and are sufficient to fulfill its mission and goals, to continuously assess and improve its programs and services, and to respond effectively to opportunities and challenges. Columbia-Greene Community College s assessment stems from its Strategic Plan based on the College Goals. All Academic and Non-Academic Programs and Services outcomes align with the Strategic Plan. 1
3 III. Assessment Committees The following assessment committees are involved in the execution of institutional assessment. A. Institutional Assessment Planning Group (IAPG) IAPG oversees assessment for all areas and generates the Institutional Effectiveness Report Card. IAPG membership consists of the Vice President and Dean of Academic Affairs, chair(s) of the Strategic Planning Committee (SPC), chair(s) of the Academic Assessment Committee (AAC), chair(s) of the Non-Academic Assessment Committee (NAC), the Director of Institutional Research and Assessment, and one at-large member. One member continues as a Middle States advocate. IAPG reports directly to the President and is charged to: Update the Institutional Assessment Plan and oversee its implementation Promote and encourage meaningful, authentic, and sustainable assessment Collaborate with the SPC to create the annual Institutional Effectiveness Report Card Guide the activities of the Academic and Non-Academic Assessment Committees Ensure accreditation compliance Support and communicate with the campus in assessments Be responsive to the needs of various stakeholders Report regularly to the President on progress with the assessment process IAPG meets monthly to facilitate communication between the other three committees involved in institutional assessment (SPC, AAC, and NAC). It makes recommendations to the President concerning ongoing institutional, department, and program/course level assessment of student learning and institutional effectiveness. Assessment results from AAC, NAC, and Institutional Research are used to create the Institutional Effectiveness Report Card, which is presented to the President in August of each year. The Report Card is disseminated to the campus community through the College Intranet, at the All-College Meeting, and at the Board of Trustees meetings (Appendix 1: Institutional Effectiveness Report Card Template). 2
4 B. Strategic Planning Committee (SPC) The SPC monitors the use of the Strategic Plan with a focus on determining its effect on institutional assessment, resource allocation, and decision-making regarding the attainment of College goals. The SPC operates in conjunction with IAPG, and reports to the College President. The College President appoints the SPC membership (Appendix 2: Strategic Plan ). SPC membership consists of the Director of Institutional Research and Assessment, VP of Academic Affairs, VP of Students & Enrollment Management, VP of Administration, Director of Computer Information Systems, Director of Building & Grounds, a faculty representative, and other members appointed by the President as needed. The SPC reports directly to the President and is charged to: Create a plan for the upcoming years in conjunction with the President Develop strategic plan objectives and benchmarking for the Institutional Effectiveness Report Card, in conjunction with IAPG Assign responsibility for the plan s objectives and accountability Monitor the use of the strategic plan: o Through review of assessment results, and reporting of data in the Institutional Effectiveness Report Card, in conjunction with IAPG o To assure that assessment is used in resource allocation, in conjunction with the President and President s Staff Recommend new planning initiatives and activities as necessary Report strategic planning progress to the President C. Academic Assessment Committee (AAC) AAC oversees academic assessment activities and reports to the VP and Dean of Academic Affairs. Membership consists of the Dean of Academic Affairs, Outcomes Assessment Coordinator, five faculty members and one staff member (3 year appointments). The committee charge includes an active role in the Assessment of the Major (Program Review), assessment of the College s general education requirements, and course assessment, including overseeing plans, schedule, reports, and use of results. AAC seeks out and encourages participation in 3
5 professional development opportunities on assessment, and communicates activities and progress to IAPG on a monthly basis (Appendix 3: Academic Assessment Plan) D. Non-Academic Assessment Committee (NAC) NAC monitors and supports non-academic assessment and reports directly to IAPG. The eight members include: Director of Institutional Research and Assessment, member of the VP of Academic Affairs staff, member of the VP and Dean of Students staff, member of the VP of Administration s staff, one faculty member, and three staff and/or administrator representatives. The President makes all appointments from recommendations provided by the Vice-Presidents. Members have three year staggered appointments. NAC communicates information regarding internal and external data sources to all non-academic units while providing information, training, and guidance regarding unit assessment processes. NAC promotes the use of assessment data as a mechanism to support the College s planning, assessment, and budget cycle. NAC collects and disseminates assessment plan information and results to IAPG (Appendix 4: Non- Academic Assessment Plan). IV. Assessment Process The following diagram describes the cyclical nature of the assessment process for Columbia- Greene Community College. 4
6 A. Institutional Effectiveness 1. Strategic Planning The Strategic Plan guides the development of initiatives to further the goals of the College and to support the connection between allocation of resources and institutional assessment. Institutional Effectiveness is guided by IAPG, which provides input into the development of objectives for each of the goals in the Strategic Plan. The Plan reflects consideration of assessment results and identifies measures of assessment and benchmarks that will be used to determine progress towards meeting the objectives. 2. Integration of Planning and Assessment Progress on the objectives in the Strategic Plan is reviewed annually using the Institutional Effectiveness Report Card produced by IAPG. The President uses the information from the report card to set priorities and directs new and continuing initiatives for the next assessment cycle. Members of IAPG communicate the President s priorities to their respective committees (SPC, AAC, NAC), who work with academic departments and unit leaders to align area goals and priorities and guide their annual assessment activities. All assessments relate to the goals and objectives of the Strategic Plan and the priorities set by the President. Assessment reports include an analysis of assessment results and action plans for unmet objectives. After implementation of the action plans, objectives are measured again. Reports are submitted to AAC and NAC and brought to IAPG for review and incorporation into the Institutional Effectiveness Report Card. 3. Resource Allocation (Budget) Related to Planning and Assessment Directors and department heads complete a budget request form for each budget cycle. Budget requests relate to the goals and objectives of the Strategic Plan and are supported by assessment results. Initially the appropriate Vice-President approves budget requests, and then each director/department head presents requests at a hearing before the College President and Vice- Presidents. After all budget requests have been heard, the President and Vice-Presidents use the Strategic Plan priorities as well as assessment results to make resource allocation decisions. The President brings the final budget recommendation to the Board of Trustees and county sponsors for approval. (Appendix 5: Budget Justification Worksheet) 5
7 B. Learning Outcomes Along with institutional measures of effectiveness, the College also assesses student learning at three levels: (1) the institutional level through the General Education requirements, (2) the program level, and (3) the course level. 1. General Education Assessment Students fulfill the 20-credit general education requirements via the College s institutional degree requirements (EN 101, EN 102, and at least one Math, Science, Humanities, Social Science, and Physical Education/Health course). The Academic Assessment Committee reviews assessment results from the previous three-year cycle in the rotating 10 SUNY Knowledge and Skills areas plus the two competencies. The analysis of those results are shared with faculty, examined for recommendations in course presentation, used for divisional direction, and integrated into the data used for the Assessment of the Major. 2. Program Level Assessment (Assessment of the Major) The College follows the SUNY process for the Assessment of the Major, reviewing each program every five-years. All assessments of the major include review of program outcomes, program retention, graduation rates, performance after transfer, data from support services (Library, Academic Support Center, Advising Team), Student Opinion Survey (SOS) results, and the input of external reviewers. The Assessment of the Major process is a collaboration of the division and the Academic Assessment Committee. (Appendix 6: Assessment of the Major Data List) 3. Course Level Assessment Annual course assessment results include action plans for the continual improvement of student learning. In addition, course assessment results are discussed in monthly division meetings, shared with adjuncts, and used for the Assessment of the Major. Course assessment plans, sample grading rubrics, assessment webinars, AAC committee minutes, and other assessment resources are posted on the College s Blackboard assessment course site which is available to all faculty. 6
8 V. Integrated Strategic Planning, Assessment, and Budgeting Timeline The strategic planning, assessment, and budgeting functions of the College create a process from goal setting to the allocation of resources. The College uses the outcome assessment data to ensure appropriate funding of the institution s priorities. Strategic planning is conducted on an overall five-year cycle. The Strategic Plan is annually assessed for progress, and budget decisions are based on the results of assessment and progress on strategic goals. The Integrated Strategic Planning, Assessment, and Budgeting Timeline is provided on the following page. VI. Assessing Assessment At the close of each annual and five-year comprehensive assessment cycle IAPG coordinates the evaluation of all institutional assessment. IAPG, with the SPC, makes recommendations and suggestions for future assessment and this information is brought back to programs and services through AAC and NAC. IAPG will review the Institutional Assessment Plan to coincide with the five-year comprehensive assessment cycle. 7
9 Integrated Strategic Planning, Assessment, and Budgeting Timeline Fall Spring Summer September October November December January February March April May June July August IR provides ATOM data to division chairs Institutional Research (IR) data collection IAPG meets monthly to review AAC, NAC, and SPC assessment activities and progress made toward strategic goals Begin Assessment of the Major (ATOM) process Course instructors submit Fall semester outcomes assessments to AAC Course instructors submit Spring semester outcomes assessments to AAC IR compiles Institutional Effectiveness Report Card (IERC) data and results IAPG and SPC collaborate with the President to develop the upcoming year s strategic objectives for the IERC Complete Assessment of the Major (ATOM) process IERC and strategic priorities are shared with the campus at All College Day Faculty participate in assessment activities at "All College Day" Begin non-academic assessment planning process Non-academic units collect data and submit plans Finance office distributes budget request form to budget managers Budget managers submit next year's fiscal budget requests, supported by assessment results President s Staff presides over budget hearings, develops a balanced budget, and aligns resources by establishing goals and priorities for the upcoming year. A tentative budget is submitted to Board of Trustees' Finance Committee. Nonacademic units submit assessment plan results to NAC, then to IAPG Proposed budget submitted to Board of Trustees for approval An annual Non-Academic Assessment Event is planned by NAC, in collaboration with IAPG Dean of Administration gathers evidence from recent budget hearings used in decision making. The proposed budget is submitted to county sponsors for approval. Nonacademic units participate in assessment activities at "All College Day" Department heads review progress on action plans and align their program and department goals with strategic goals and priorities
10 Appendix 1: Institutional Effectiveness Report Card Template <STRATEGIC GOAL> Objective Standard <Objective description> (measureable representation of the strategic goal) <Standard description> (acceptable level of performance) Measure #: <Measure title> (measure may be direct or indirect) Direct Measures: require individuals or entities to demonstrate their knowledge, skills, and/or a behavior that reflects achievement of the stated goal (e.g. standardized exams, retention rate, etc.). Indirect Measures: rely on individual perceptions to determine if a goal/objective has been achieved (e.g. surveys, interviews, course grades, etc.) Figure # or Table #: <Title of Figure or Table> *Source: Vanderbilt University Assessment, 2010 <Introductory paragraph that includes an explanation of how the measure assesses the stated objective as well as any information necessary for the interpretation of data that follow> Example Figure C-GCC 2% 3.9 Peer Institutions <Data source> <Figure or Table notes> Future Direction <Paragraph that indicates any changes to how the Strategic Goal will be measured in the following year s Report Card> (i.e. whether it will be measured using a different objective, standard, and/or measure)
11 Appendix 2: Strategic Plan STRATEGIC PLAN SEPTEMBER 1, AUGUST 31, 2016 Focus: Enrollment & Retention Enrollment, Retention, and Completion Objective = Outcome Standard = Indicator Measurement = Data Source ( ) Information in brackets are only examples and not inclusive lists Goal 1: Quality Education (VP/Dean Academics) Objective 1: Students will attain core academic proficiencies as defined in our Academic Philosophy Standard: All programs are in alignment with the academic philosophy. Measurement: Assessment of the Major, with SUNY GED review, Student Opinion Survey (S.O.S.) with local questions for Academic Philosophy, graduate survey N.C.C.B.P., nonacademic assessments. Objective 2: Student Academic Support Services will reflect the College s commitment to excellence. Standard: The College s Academic Support Services will compare favorably with peer institutions. Students and faculty will report that Student Academic Support Services meet or exceed expectations. Measurement: S.O.S., Graduate Survey, N.C.C.B.P., non-academic assessments, retention rate, SUNY reports. Objective 3: The teaching and learning environment will meet or exceed student expectations. Standard: Students report they are satisfied with the teaching and learning environment. The Transferability of the College s Academic Programs will compare favorably with peer institutions. College graduation rates will compare favorably with peer institutions. Measurement: S.O.S., Student evaluations of teaching, Transfer and Graduate rates, Academic Performance of Transfers, graduate survey.
12 STRATEGIC PLAN SEPTEMBER 1, AUGUST 31, 2016 Focus: Enrollment & Retention Enrollment, Retention, and Completion Objective = Outcome Standard = Indicator Measurement = Data Source ( ) Information in brackets are only examples and not inclusive lists Goal 2: Accessibility (VP/Deans Administration, Academics, Student) Objective 1: Affordability Standard: Maintain tuition and fees comparable to SUNY peers Maintain or increase scholarship opportunities for students Students will report satisfaction with cost of College. Measurement: SUNY peer benchmarking, S.O.S., non-academic assessment (Foundation, Business Office) Objective 2: Prepare academically challenged students for College success. Standard: Increase long-term academic performance of students taking transitional courses. Measurement: N.C.C.B.P., SIRIS reporting of grades, and course assessments. Objective 3: Diversify the student population Standard: Maintain optimum level of students by recruiting in new markets Measurement: SIRIS reporting of # of registered students (who are early admits, distance learning, veterans, international, etc.); DOL referrals, Enrollment Management non-academic assessment, monthly admissions reports, S.O.S., non-traditional student population
13 STRATEGIC PLAN SEPTEMBER 1, AUGUST 31, 2016 Focus: Enrollment & Retention Enrollment, Retention, and Completion Objective = Outcome Standard = Indicator Measurement = Data Source ( ) Information in brackets are only examples and not inclusive lists Goal 3: Excellent Facilities (VP/Deans Administration, Academics, Student) Objective 1: Provide a physical infrastructure that supports the College s commitment to educational excellence. Standard: Maintain adequate availability of teaching environments. Measurement: Room usage statistics, OAS (Office of Accessibility Services) reports, equipment in classroom data, community use satisfaction survey. Objective 2: Provide effective technology that support teaching and learning outcomes. Standard: Adhere to the academic and administrative technology plans. Students will report satisfaction with technology. Measurement: Assessment of the Major, Program Accreditations (for example Automotive, Computer Science), Non-academic assessments (CIS, Library, ASC) S.O.S Objective 3: Maintain a Safe and Secure Campus Standard: Students report they are satisfied with the College environment in that they feel safe. Measurement: Campus safety statistics, Incident Reports, Emergency Management Plan, S.O.S., Non-academic assessments.
14 STRATEGIC PLAN SEPTEMBER 1, AUGUST 31, 2016 Focus: Enrollment & Retention Enrollment, Retention, and Completion Objective = Outcome Standard = Indicator Measurement = Data Source ( ) Information in brackets are only examples and not inclusive lists Goal 4: Student Centered (VP/Deans Academics, Student) Objective 1: The College will foster an atmosphere where students feel connected to the learning environment (in achieving goals for graduation and/or career and/or successful transfer.) Standard: Maintain current faculty/student contact structure. Measurement: Retention data, IPEDS, SIRIS reporting on Faculty/Student ratio; Transfer and Graduate rates, Academic Performance of Transfers, N.C.C.B.P., SOS. Objective 2: The College will foster an atmosphere where students feel connected to the College in a personal way. Standard: College services will remain accessible and provide effective service. Measurement: S.O.S., Graduate Survey, Non-academic assessments (Student Development.)
15 STRATEGIC PLAN SEPTEMBER 1, AUGUST 31, 2016 Focus: Enrollment & Retention Enrollment, Retention, and Completion Objective = Outcome Standard = Indicator Measurement = Data Source ( ) Information in brackets are only examples and not inclusive lists Goal 5: Service to the Community (VP/Deans Administration, Academics, Student) Objective 1: The College will effectively serve the social, cultural needs of its local community. Standard: The College will offer a variety of programs and services responsive to the community. (Non-credit course offerings, Lectures, Concerts, Outside Group Facilities Use, Summer Camps, etc) Measurement: Board of Trustees Facilities Use Report, Non-academic assessments (CS, AV Media, Library, PR, Student Services), non-credit instructional activities survey (NCIA). Objective 2: The College will provide business and industry training needs for its local community. Standard: The College will offer a variety of training responsive to the community. Measurement: Non-academic assessments
16 STRATEGIC PLAN SEPTEMBER 1, AUGUST 31, 2016 Focus: Enrollment & Retention Enrollment, Retention, and Completion Objective = Outcome Standard = Indicator Measurement = Data Source ( ) Information in brackets are only examples and not inclusive lists Goal 6: Sound Management (President) Objective 1: The College will maintain its public trust. Standard: Continuous no-exception Third-Party Review Audit Reports/State & Federal Regulation Compliance Measurement: Audit Reports Compliance, Non-academic assessments (Business Office, Financial Aid) Objective 2: The College will meet its mission efficiently and effectively. Standard 2.1: Maintain Positive Fund Balance equivalent to the Government Standard Board of 5-15% Measurement: Fund Balance, Consistent Positive votes on College budget by the two County sponsors Standard 2.2: The College will maintain compliance with the standards set forth by relevant accrediting bodies. Measurement: Accreditation Reports; Maintain accreditations Objective 3: The College will increase development efforts for outside and non-traditional resources. Standard: Adhere to the College Foundation s strategic plan to create a major fundraising event. The event will generate $50,000 in new revenue. Measurement: Foundation board minutes related to discussion of the fundraising events, Nonacademic assessments, comparable financial statements.
17 Appendix 3: Academic Assessment Plan ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT Plan Columbia-Greene Community College 2014
18 General Education Requirements Students fulfill the 20 credit general education requirements via the institutional degree requirements (EN 101, EN 102, Math, Science, Humanities, Social Science and Physical Education/Health). The Academic Assessment Committee reviews the assessment results from the previous threeyear cycle. The results are shared with faculty, posted on the Blackboard assessment website, examined for recommendations in course presentation, divisional direction, and will be integrated into the data used for the Assessment of the Major. Program Level-Assessment - Assessment of the Major The College follows the SUNY process for the Assessment of the Major, reviewing all programs over a five-year cycle. Currently all assessments of the major include measurement of program outcomes, in addition to the standard assessments of program retention, graduation rates, performance after transfer, Student Opinion Survey (SOS), and includes the input of external reviewers. The Academic Assessment Committee (AAC) reviews all program and related course learning outcomes. The Committee collaborates with program leaders to create a curriculum grid linking program and course learning outcomes. The Committee also reviews the course assessment results from the previous 5 years. This process is following a complete cycle of program assessment. Course Assessment Faculty assess each course on their schedule at least once per academic year. Course assessment results are discussed in monthly division meetings, shared with adjuncts, and used in the Assessment of the Major. Course assessment plans, sample grading rubrics, assessment webinars, AAC committee minutes, and other assessment resources are posted on the College s Blackboard assessment course site, available to all faculty.
19 Plan A course assessment plan is required of every course taught at C-GCC. The plan includes: Learning outcomes The method by which each outcome is assessed The procedure for determining the standards by which a student exceeds, meets, approaches, or does not meet each outcome Instructions for completing a course assessment plan, as well as a blank template, can be obtained on the Outcomes Assessment Blackboard site. All completed course assessment plans can be accessed on the Outcomes Assessment Blackboard site. Report Faculty assess each course on their schedule at least once per academic year. Assessment results are documented on an assessment report form. Assessment results consist of the number and percent of students who exceed, meet, approach, or do not meet each outcome for the course and section described. The form also asks for an action that may be taken to improve student learning as well as comments on the implementation and effectiveness of any previous actions. A blank form template can be obtained on the Outcomes Assessment Blackboard site. Preparation for Course Assessment Go to the College s Blackboard website to ensure any existing plan is current and meets your course needs Revise/update or create a course assessment plan as needed. This should be done in collaboration with the Division Chair and other faculty teaching the same course Submit revised/created plans to your Division Chair and OA Coordinator Check that your course outline includes the outcomes as stated on the course assessment plan Submit the plan along with your course outline to the Academic Dean s office before the start of classes
20 Practice Refer to the learning outcomes when preparing exams and assignments to ensure face validity (the exam/assignment is a good measure of the outcome) Assess student performance relative to each learning outcome Complete an assessment report for each course Submit report to your Division Chair and OA Coordinator Submission Deadlines: For fall semester, Assessment Report is due by January All-College Meeting For spring semester, Assessment Report is due by Graduation For summer semesters, Assessment Report is due by August All-College Meeting Analysis of Results Review results and action statements with section colleagues and chair Conduct norming sessions to evaluate any rubrics used Ensure that the learning outcomes reflected the major goals of the course, and were measurable, hence assessing the plan. Take appropriate action General Education Schedule The Arts Humanities Other World Civilizations Natural Science Western Civilization Social Science Basic Communications Critical Thinking Information Management Mathematics American History Foreign Language
21 Appendix 4: Non-academic Assessment Plan Non-academic Assessment Plan Phase 1 Collecting Data Phase 2 Reviewing, analyzing, and developing assessment plans Phase 3 Action Phase 4 Review and timelines Phase 5 Refining, repeating, and reflecting Phase 6 The review cycle continues Annual Schedule August June October 1 November 1 November April May NAC meets monthly Unit Assessment Plans due to NAC and respective Dean NAC Approval of Unit Assessment Plans NAC support of assessment efforts Completed Unit Assessment Reports due to NAC Membership Nicole Strevell, Chair Casey O Brien Harold Lansing Leslie Rousseau Diana Smith Jan Winig Jen Colwell Karen Fiducia Faculty Institutional Research Facilities & Maintenance Advising Institutional Research CIS Business Office Student Activities
22 Appendix 5: Budget Justification Worksheet
23 Appendix 6: Assessment of the Major Data List Data Provided for Assessment of the Major The Office of Institutional Research and Assessment provides the following data for each program being assessed. This information is used to guide and support institutional as well as programmatic decisions and recommendations. Student Demographics Full/part-time status Gender Age Race Residence Enrollment & Retention 5-year enrollment 1-year retention rates Graduate & Transfer Degrees granted Average GPA of graduates Transfer schools and programs for graduates as well as non-graduates SUNY Student Opinion Survey Frequency distribution of responses to Academic Philosophy question items Frequency distribution of responses to questions pertaining to a program s core course
Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,
Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan, 2005-2010 Mission: Volunteer State Community College is a public, comprehensive community college offering associate degrees, certificates, continuing
More informationState Parental Involvement Plan
A Toolkit for Title I Parental Involvement Section 3 Tools Page 41 Tool 3.1: State Parental Involvement Plan Description This tool serves as an example of one SEA s plan for supporting LEAs and schools
More informationUniversity of Toronto
University of Toronto OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT AND PROVOST Governance and Administration of Extra-Departmental Units Interdisciplinarity Committee Working Group Report Following approval by Governing
More informationProcedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review
Procedures for Academic Program Review Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review Last Revision: August 2013 1 Table of Contents Background and BOG Requirements... 2 Rationale
More informationSchool Leadership Rubrics
School Leadership Rubrics The School Leadership Rubrics define a range of observable leadership and instructional practices that characterize more and less effective schools. These rubrics provide a metric
More informationSelf Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT
Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT 84341-5600 Document Generated On June 13, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Standard 1: Purpose and Direction 2 Standard 2: Governance
More informationASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY The assessment of student learning begins with educational values. Assessment is not an end in itself but a vehicle
More informationVolunteer State Community College Budget and Planning Priorities
Volunteer State Community College Budget and Planning Priorities 2007-08 VSCC Goals and Outcomes Objective Baseline Budget and Planning VSCC Goal : Volunteer State Community College will promote, document,
More informationACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES
ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES Section 8: General Education Title: General Education Assessment Guidelines Number (Current Format) Number (Prior Format) Date Last Revised 8.7 XIV 09/2017 Reference: BOR Policy
More informationGUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION
GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION A Publication of the Accrediting Commission For Community and Junior Colleges Western Association of Schools and Colleges For use in
More informationStandards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS
Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS World Headquarters 11520 West 119th Street Overland Park, KS 66213 USA USA Belgium Perú acbsp.org info@acbsp.org
More informationDelaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators
Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators DPAS-II Guide for Administrators (Assistant Principals) Guide for Evaluating Assistant Principals Revised August
More informationRevision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience
Revision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience Revision of Core Program In 2009 a Core Curriculum Task Force with representatives from every academic division was appointed by
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. By-Law 1: The Faculty Council...3
FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, University of Ottawa Faculty By-Laws (November 21, 2017) TABLE OF CONTENTS By-Law 1: The Faculty Council....3 1.1 Mandate... 3 1.2 Members... 3 1.3 Procedures for electing Faculty
More informationComprehensive Student Services Program Review
Comprehensive Student Services Program Review 2014-2015 Extended Opportunity Programs & Services (EOPS) and Cooperative Agencies Resources for Education (CARE) Mission Statement: Mt. San Jacinto College
More informationStudent Learning Outcomes: A new model of assessment
Student Learning Outcomes: A new model of assessment Proposed Spring 2012 by members of the Teaching and Learning Project: Tawny Beal, Scott Cabral, Christina Goff, Mike Grillo, Kiran Kamath, Cindy McGrath,
More informationJuly 17, 2017 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL. John Tafaro, President Chatfield College State Route 251 St. Martin, OH Dear President Tafaro:
July 17, 2017 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL John Tafaro, President Chatfield College 20918 State Route 251 St. Martin, OH 45118 Dear President Tafaro: This letter is formal notification of action taken by the Higher
More informationAPPENDIX A-13 PERIODIC MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF FACULTY & LIBRARIANS (PMYR) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL
APPENDIX A-13 PERIODIC MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF FACULTY & LIBRARIANS (PMYR) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL PREAMBLE The practice of regular review of faculty and librarians based upon the submission of
More informationAssessment of Student Academic Achievement
Assessment of Student Academic Achievement 13 Chapter Parkland s commitment to the assessment of student academic achievement and its documentation is reflected in the college s mission statement; it also
More informationSTANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION
Arizona Department of Education Tom Horne, Superintendent of Public Instruction STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 5 REVISED EDITION Arizona Department of Education School Effectiveness Division
More informationSORORITY AND FRATERNITY AFFAIRS FLORIDA GREEK STANDARDS ACCREDITATION PROGRAM FOR SOCIAL SORORITIES AND FRATERNITIES
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF STUDENT AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF STUDENT ACTIVITIES AND INVOLVEMENT SORORITY AND FRATERNITY AFFAIRS FLORIDA GREEK STANDARDS ACCREDITATION PROGRAM FOR SOCIAL SORORITIES AND
More informationAB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:
AB104 Adult Education Block Grant Performance Year: 2015-2016 Funding source: AB104, Section 39, Article 9 Version 1 Release: October 9, 2015 Reporting & Submission Process Required Funding Recipient Content
More informationVOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION CONTENTS Vol Vision 2020 Summary Overview Approach Plan Phase 1 Key Initiatives, Timelines, Accountability Strategy Dashboard Phase 1 Metrics and Indicators
More informationDOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL Overview of the Doctor of Philosophy Board The Doctor of Philosophy Board (DPB) is a standing committee of the Johns Hopkins University that reports
More informationFocus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION
Focus on Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL ACCREDITING COMMISSION FOR SCHOOLS, WESTERN ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES www.acswasc.org 10/10/12 2013 WASC EDITION Focus on Learning THE ACCREDITATION
More informationACCREDITATION STANDARDS
ACCREDITATION STANDARDS Description of the Profession Interpretation is the art and science of receiving a message from one language and rendering it into another. It involves the appropriate transfer
More informationLincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal
ISS Administrative Searches is pleased to announce Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal Seeks Elementary Principal Application Deadline: October 30, 2017 Visit the ISS Administrative Searches webpage to view
More informationDelaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators
Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators DPAS-II Guide (Revised) for Teachers Updated August 2017 Table of Contents I. Introduction to DPAS II Purpose of
More informationSPORTS POLICIES AND GUIDELINES
April 27, 2010 SPORTS POLICIES AND GUIDELINES I. POLICY AND INTENT A. Eligibility Residents of Scarsdale and the Mamaroneck Strip ( residents of Scarsdale ) and students who attend the Scarsdale Public
More informationPROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program
PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM Institution Submitting Proposal Degree Designation as on Diploma Title of Proposed Degree Program EEO Status CIP Code Academic Unit (e.g. Department, Division, School)
More informationUpward Bound Program
SACS Preparation Division of Student Affairs Upward Bound Program REQUIREMENTS: The institution provides student support programs, services, and activities consistent with its mission that promote student
More informationMIDTERM REPORT. Solano Community College 4000 Suisun Valley Road Fairfield, California
MIDTERM REPORT Solano Community College 4000 Suisun Valley Road Fairfield, California 94534-3197 Submitted to the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges Western Association of Schools
More informationPattern of Administration, Department of Art. Pattern of Administration Department of Art Revised: Autumn 2016 OAA Approved December 11, 2016
Pattern of Administration Department of Art Revised: Autumn 2016 OAA Approved December 11, 2016 Table of Contents I. Introduction... 3 II. Department Mission and Description... 3 III. Academic Rights and
More informationChapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program
Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program Background Initial, Standard Professional I (SP I) licenses are issued to teachers with fewer than three years of appropriate teaching experience (normally
More informationCharter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity
School Reporting and Monitoring Activity All information and documents listed below are to be provided to the Schools Office by the date shown, unless another date is specified in pre-opening conditions
More informationUNIVERSIDAD DEL ESTE Vicerrectoría Académica Vicerrectoría Asociada de Assessment Escuela de Ciencias y Tecnología
UNIVERSIDAD DEL ESTE Vicerrectoría Académica Vicerrectoría Asociada de Escuela de Ciencias y Tecnología ASSESSMENT PLAN OF THE ASSOCIATE DEGREES IN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY Rev: Dec-2015 CHARACTERISTICS
More informationRaj Soin College of Business Bylaws
Raj Soin College of Business Bylaws Approved October 8, 2002 Amended June 8, 2010 Amended January 30, 2013 These bylaws establish policies and procedures required by the Collective Bargaining Agreement.
More informationABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs
ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs Mapped to 2008 NSSE Survey Questions First Edition, June 2008 Introduction and Rationale for Using NSSE in ABET Accreditation One of the most common
More informationHigher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College
Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd April 2016 Contents About this review... 1 Key findings... 2 QAA's judgements about... 2 Good practice... 2 Theme: Digital Literacies...
More informationWeek 4: Action Planning and Personal Growth
Week 4: Action Planning and Personal Growth Overview So far in the Comprehensive Needs Assessment of your selected campus, you have analyzed demographic and student learning data through the AYP report,
More informationThe University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary
The University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary The University of North Carolina General Administration January 5, 2017 Introduction The University of
More informationSORORITY AND FRATERNITY AFFAIRS POLICY ON EXPANSION FOR SOCIAL SORORITIES AND FRATERNITIES
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF STUDENT AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF STUDENT ACTIVITIES AND INVOLVEMENT SORORITY AND FRATERNITY AFFAIRS POLICY ON EXPANSION FOR SOCIAL SORORITIES AND FRATERNITIES The Policy
More informationStrategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
29-21 Strategic Plan Dashboard Results Office of Institutional Research and Assessment Binghamton University Office of Institutional Research and Assessment Definitions Fall Undergraduate and Graduate
More informationEducation: Professional Experience: Personnel leadership and management
Cathie Cline, Ed.D. Education: Ed.D., Higher Education, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, December 2006. Dissertation: The Influence of Faculty-Student Interaction on Graduation Rates at Rural Two-Year
More informationDifferential Tuition Budget Proposal FY
Differential Tuition Budget Proposal FY 2013-2014 MPA Differential Tuition Subcommittee MPA Faculty This document presents the budget proposal of the MPA Differential Tuition Subcommittee (MPADTS) for
More informationMGMT 479 (Hybrid) Strategic Management
Columbia College Online Campus P a g e 1 MGMT 479 (Hybrid) Strategic Management Late Fall 15/12 October 26, 2015 December 19, 2015 Course Description Culminating experience/capstone course for majors in
More informationEnvision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals
Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals Institutional Priority: Improve the front door experience Identify metrics appropriate to
More informationHIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN
HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview 1 Eligible Credit Flexibility Plans 2 Earned Credit from Credit Flexibility Plans 2 Student Athletes 3 Application Process 3 Final
More informationINDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM
INSTRUCTION BOARD POLICY BP6158 INDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM The Governing Board authorizes independent study as a voluntary alternative instructional setting by which students may reach curricular objectives
More informationFORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY
FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY INTRODUCTION Economic prosperity for individuals and the state relies on an educated workforce. For Kansans to succeed in the workforce, they must have an education
More informationDeveloping an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning
Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning By Peggy L. Maki, Senior Scholar, Assessing for Learning American Association for Higher Education (pre-publication version of article that
More informationIndividual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK
Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program at Washington State University 2017-2018 Faculty/Student HANDBOOK Revised August 2017 For information on the Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program
More informationSchool Performance Plan Middle Schools
SY 2012-2013 School Performance Plan Middle Schools 734 Middle ALternative Program @ Lombard, Principal Roger Shaw (Interim), Executive Director, Network Facilitator PLEASE REFER TO THE SCHOOL PERFORMANCE
More informationMaster of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration
Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in Leadership in Educational Administration Effective October 9, 2017 Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in Leadership in
More informationNew Program Process, Guidelines and Template
New Program Process, Guidelines and Template This document outlines the process and guidelines for the Florida Tech academic units to introduce new programs (options, minors, degree, for-credit certificate
More informationNumber of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)
Program: Journalism Minor Department: Communication Studies Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20 Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012) Period of reference
More informationEmerald Coast Career Institute N
Okaloosa County School District Emerald Coast Career Institute N 2017-18 School Improvement Plan Okaloosa - 0791 - - 2017-18 SIP 500 ALABAMA ST, Crestview, FL 32536 [ no web address on file ] School Demographics
More informationIndiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process
Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning ICPBL Certification mission is to PBL Certification Process ICPBL Processing Center c/o CELL 1400 East Hanna Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46227 (317) 791-5702
More informationMinistry Audit Form 2016
Angela D Sims Your ministry audit has been submitted to the ACC Team. You may use the link you receive with this email to view and edit your application. Date created: 12/21/2016 Ministry Audit Form 2016
More informationPROGRAM REVIEW REPORT. Radiation Therapy Technology
INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS The Best Place to Start PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT Radiation Therapy Technology Program Review annually assesses the viability of credit and non-credit instructional programs and
More informationBureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION A Framework for Continuous School Improvement Planning (Summer 2009) GETTING RESULTS Continuous School Improvement Plan Gen 6-2 Year Plan Required for Schools in School
More informationSELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR REVIEW of the COMPUTER SCIENCE PROGRAM and the INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROGRAM
Disclaimer: This Self Study was developed to meet the goals of the CAC Session at the 2006 Summit. It should not be considered as a model or a template. ABET SELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR REVIEW of the
More informationBuffalo School Board Governance
POLICY BRIEF December 9, 2013 Buffalo School Board Governance William Miller SUNY Buffalo Law Student What is the Buffalo Board of Education? The Board of Education of the Buffalo City School District
More informationWorkload Policy Department of Art and Art History Revised 5/2/2007
Workload Policy Department of Art and Art History Revised 5/2/2007 Workload expectations for faculty in the Department of Art and Art History, in the areas of teaching, research, and service, must be consistent
More informationKelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)
Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association 2015-2017 Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP) Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association 2015-2017 Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP) TABLE
More informationFrequently Asked Questions Archdiocesan Collaborative Schools (ACS)
Frequently Asked Questions Archdiocesan Collaborative Schools (ACS) Question: What is the rationale for the development of the Archdiocesan Collaborative School (ACS) model? Answer: As the Blue Ribbon
More informationPOLICIES AND PROCEDURES
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON - CLEAR LAKE School of Education POLICIES AND PROCEDURES December 10, 2004 Version 8.3 SCHOOL OF EDUCATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE PREAMBLE...
More informationBasic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs
Basic Skills Plus Legislation and Guidelines Hope Opportunity Jobs Page 2 of 7 Basic Skills Plus Legislation When the North Carolina General Assembly passed the 2010 budget bill, one of their legislative
More informationOrientation Workshop on Outcome Based Accreditation. May 21st, 2016
Orientation Workshop on Outcome Based Accreditation May 21st, 2016 ABOUT NBA Established in the year 1994 under Section 10 (u) of AICTE Act. NBA became Autonomous in January 2010 and in April 2013 the
More informationCourse Buyout Policy & Procedures
Course uyout Policy & Procedures The University of Texas at San Antonio College of usiness Office of Faculty & Research Last updated: June 2017 1 COURSE UYOUT POLICY AND PROCEDURES Course load reductions
More informationASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)
Employee Services P 4979 1230 F 4979 1369 POSITION DESCRIPTION ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12) REF NO: 7081 POSITION DESCRIPTION REPORTS TO Director of Schools PURPOSE The Assistant Director of Schools
More informationCollege of Business University of South Florida St. Petersburg Governance Document As Amended by the College Faculty on February 10, 2014
College of Business University of South Florida St. Petersburg Governance Document As Amended by the College Faculty on February 10, 2014 Administrative Structure for Academic Policy Purpose: The administrative
More informationEarly Warning System Implementation Guide
Linking Research and Resources for Better High Schools betterhighschools.org September 2010 Early Warning System Implementation Guide For use with the National High School Center s Early Warning System
More informationAssumption University Five-Year Strategic Plan ( )
Assumption University Five-Year Strategic Plan (2014 2018) AU Strategies for Development AU Five-Year Strategic Plan (2014 2018) Vision, Mission, Uniqueness, Identity and Goals Au Vision Assumption University
More informationThe Characteristics of Programs of Information
ACRL stards guidelines Characteristics of programs of information literacy that illustrate best practices: A guideline by the ACRL Information Literacy Best Practices Committee Approved by the ACRL Board
More informationAIS KUWAIT. School Improvement Plan (SIP)
AIS KUWAIT School Improvement (SIP) Student Performance Objective #1: By, AIS students will be more competent in mathematics. 2 2 016 04 25 updated by AIS SIP Committee SP1 Goal #1: The AIS curriculum
More informationCurrent Position Information (if applicable) Current Status: SPA (Salary Grade ) EPA New Position
Form 01 The University of North Carolina Office of the President and General Administration Designation Request Form Institution: UNC Asheville Division/School/Department: Academic Affairs/Asheville Graduate
More informationNew Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document
New Jersey Department of Education 2018-2020 World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document Please use this guidance document to help you prepare for your district s application submission
More informationYouth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General
Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ Office of the Deputy Director General Produced by the Pedagogical Management Team Joe MacNeil, Ida Gilpin, Kim Quinn with the assisstance of John Weideman and
More informationEXPANSION PACKET Revision: 2015
EXPANSION PACKET Revision: 2015 Letter from the Executive Director Dear Prospective Members: We are pleased with your interest in Sigma Lambda Beta International Fraternity. Since April 4, 1986, Sigma
More informationCONTRACT TENURED FACULTY
APPENDIX D FORM A2 ADMINISTRATOR AND PEER EVALUATION FORM FOR CONTRACT TENURED FACULTY (The purposes of evaluation are described in Article 12 of the VCCCD Agreement) DATE OF VISIT: ARRIVAL TIME: DEPARTURE
More informationGRADUATE PROGRAM Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Drexel University Graduate Advisor: Prof. Caroline Schauer, Ph.D.
GRADUATE PROGRAM Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Drexel University Graduate Advisor: Prof. Caroline Schauer, Ph.D. 05/15/2012 The policies listed herein are applicable to all students
More informationMathematics Program Assessment Plan
Mathematics Program Assessment Plan Introduction This assessment plan is tentative and will continue to be refined as needed to best fit the requirements of the Board of Regent s and UAS Program Review
More information10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.
UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution. Began admitting upperclassmen in 1975 and began admitting underclassmen in 1990. 1 A
More informationContract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)
Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4) Evidence Used in Evaluation Rubric (5) Evaluation Cycle: Training (6) Evaluation Cycle: Annual Orientation (7) Evaluation Cycle:
More informationSACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports
Agenda Greetings and Overview SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports Quality Enhancement h t Plan (QEP) Discussion 2 Purpose Inform campus community about SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation
More informationGraduate Handbook Linguistics Program For Students Admitted Prior to Academic Year Academic year Last Revised March 16, 2015
Graduate Handbook Linguistics Program For Students Admitted Prior to Academic Year 2015-2016 Academic year 2014-2015 Last Revised March 16, 2015 The Linguistics Program Graduate Handbook supplements The
More informationTools to SUPPORT IMPLEMENTATION OF a monitoring system for regularly scheduled series
RSS RSS Tools to SUPPORT IMPLEMENTATION OF a monitoring system for regularly scheduled series DEVELOPED BY the Accreditation council for continuing medical education December 2005; Updated JANUARY 2008
More informationADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY
ADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY William Carter, Director of Admission College Hall 140. MSC 128. Extension 2315. Texas A&M University-Kingsville adheres to high standards of academic excellence and admits
More informationMeet the Experts Fall Freebie November 5, 2015
Meet the Experts Fall Freebie November 5, 2015 Presented by: PARTNERS IN MEDICAL EDUCATION, INC. Today s Experts: Christine Redovan, MBA Heather Peters, M.Ed, Ph.D Candace DeMaris, MAIS Lauren McGuire,
More informationBY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
BY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA BY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA Table
More informationSELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR REVIEW of the COMPUTER SCIENCE PROGRAM
Disclaimer: This Self Study was developed to meet the goals of the CAC Session at the 2006 Summit. It should not be considered as a model or a template. ABET Computing Accreditation Commission SELF-STUDY
More informationCommunities in Schools of Virginia
Communities in Schools of Virginia General Information Contact Information Nonprofit Communities in Schools of Virginia Address 413 Stuart Circle, Unit 303 Richmond, VA 23220 Phone 804 237-8909 Fax 804
More informationField Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program
Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program Together we Shape the Future through Excellence in Teaching, Scholarship, and Leadership College of Education
More informationPOLITECNICO DI MILANO
Repertory. n. 1013 Protocol. n. 10147 Date 12 April 2011 Title I Class 2 UOR AG POLITECNICO DI MILANO THE CHANCELLOR CONSIDERING the Presidential Decree dated 7/11/1980 No 382 "Reorganization of University
More informationACADEMIC ALIGNMENT. Ongoing - Revised
ACADEMIC ALIGNMENT Sandra Andrews December 2012 Erin Busscher, John Dersch, William Faber, Lorraine Fortuna, Laurie Foster, Wilfred Gooch, Fiona Hert, Diane Patrick, Paula Sullivan and Vince James Part
More information2 Organizational. The University of Alaska System has six (6) Statewide Offices as displayed in Organizational Chart 2 1 :
2 Organizational The University of Alaska System has six (6) Statewide Offices as displayed in Organizational Chart 2 1 : Office of the President Office of Academic Affairs and Research Office of Strategy,
More informationDELAWARE CHARTER SCHOOL ANNUAL REPORT
DELAWARE CHARTER SCHOOL ANNUAL REPORT CHARTER SCHOOL INFORMATION Charter School Name: Academy of Dover Charter School Mailing Address: 104 Saulsbury Rd. City/State/Zip: Dover, DE 19904 Email: noel.rodriguez@aod.k12.de.us
More informationAlbemarle County Public Schools School Improvement Plan KEY CHANGES THIS YEAR
2013-2014 Albemarle County Public Schools School Improvement Plan KEY CHANGES THIS YEAR Three SIP Goals 1. Student Learning Goal (w/d2015 as strategy) 2. Climate/Culture Goal 3. PD Goal (Consider support
More informationResidential Admissions Procedure Manual
Residential Admissions Procedure Manual Effective January 1, 2013 2013 by the Appraisal Institute, an Illinois Not-for-Profit Corporation at 200 W. Madison, Suite 1500, Chicago, Illinois 60606. www.appraisalinstitute.org.
More information