Organisational Unit Review Procedure. Organisational Unit Review Policy. University-wide Specific. Staff Only Students Only Staff and Students
|
|
- Lewis Stewart
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Name of Procedure Governing Policy Description of Procedure Procedure applies to Organisational Unit Review Procedure Organisational Unit Review Policy The Organisational Unit Review Procedure outlines the process followed for scheduled and unscheduled reviews of Organisational Units within Australian Catholic University (ACU). University-wide Specific Staff Only Students Only Staff and Students Procedure Status New Procedure Revision of Existing Procedure Description of Revision The Organisational Unit Review Policy and Procedure have been separated and the content has been updated. Approval Authority Governing Authority Responsible Officer Vice-Chancellor Planning, Quality and Risk Committee Director, Planning and Strategic Management Approval Date 4 May 2016 Effective Date 4 May 2016 Date of Last Revision February 2016 Date of Procedure Review* December 2019 * Unless otherwise indicated, this procedure will still apply beyond the review date. Related Policies, Procedures, Guidelines and Local Protocols Organisational Unit Review Policy Quality Management Policy Risk Management Policy Organisational Unit Review Template: Terms of Reference Organisational Unit Review Template: Response Plan and Progress Update Organisational Unit Review Budget Checklist and Template Planning, Quality and Risk Committee Terms of Reference ACU Strategic Plan ACU Code of Conduct Delegations of Authority Policy and Register ACU University Staff Enterprise Agreement
2 1. SCOPE 1.1 The Organisational Unit Review Procedure is governed by Australian Catholic University s (ACU) Organisational Unit Review Policy and relates to scheduled and unscheduled reviews of Organisational Units within the University. 2. SCHEDULE OF ORGANISATIONAL UNIT REVIEWS 2.1. The Planning, Quality and Risk Committee will approve the annual schedule of Organisational Unit reviews in the preceding year Once approved, the Head of the Organisational Unit 1 will be notified of the upcoming review by the Office of the Vice-Chancellor TERMS OF REFERENCE 3.1. The Terms of Reference will be developed (using the approved template) by the Head of the Organisational Unit, in consultation with the relevant Portfolio Head 3 and/or Vice-Chancellor, usually at least six months prior to the review visit The Terms of Reference will usually be no more than 1,500 words in length and will include a statement of purpose, main areas for review, proposed Review Panel ( the Panel ) and their professional biographies, and the list of stakeholders for consultation The Terms of Reference will be provided to the Portfolio Head and Planning, Quality and Risk Committee for comment and endorsement to assure the integrity of the review and its alignment with relevant University policies and procedures The Terms of Reference will be approved by the Vice-Chancellor and published on the Office of Planning and Strategic Management staff site The formal letter of invitation and accompanying relevant documentation will be sent to the Panel usually by the Office of Planning and Strategic Management, which will outline the role and responsibilities of the Chair and Panel members. 4. SELF-EVALUATION REPORT 4.1. The Self-Evaluation Report should be a concise, evidence-based document and usually no more than 6,000 words in length (excluding the appendices and any supporting material) The Self-Evaluation Report will be developed by the Head of the Organisational Unit and endorsed by the Portfolio Head. 1 In this Procedure, this will refer to the Organisational Unit being reviewed. 2 The Vice-Chancellor may choose to delegate any responsibility included in this Procedure. 3 In this procedure, the relevant Portfolio Head refers to the Provost, Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Chief Operating Officer or Director of Identity and Mission. ACU Organisational Unit Review Procedure Page 2 of 6
3 4.3. The Self-Evaluation Report will be provided to the Office of Planning and Strategic Management at least four weeks before the Preliminary Meeting (see section 7.1) to allow time for the Report to be reviewed by the Panel Once endorsed, the Self-Evaluation Report will be provided to the Planning, Quality and Risk Committee for noting. 5. WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS 5.1. The Chair of the Planning, Quality and Risk Committee will call for confidential written submissions from ACU staff, students (where appropriate) and external stakeholders, which will include the Terms of Reference, details of the review and timeframe for submissions The call for written submissions will usually be sent at least five weeks prior to the review visit to allow stakeholders four weeks to return their written submissions Those individuals who provide a confidential written submission may request an interview with the Panel, which will be considered by the Portfolio Head All written submissions will be sent to the Office of Planning and Strategic Management for distribution to the Panel Written submissions are confidential to the review process and comments will not be attributed to individuals in the Final Review Report. 6. SCHEDULE FOR THE REVIEW VISIT 6.1. The Office of Planning and Strategic Management will confirm the list of the proposed stakeholders for interview with the Portfolio Head. This will based upon those stakeholders identified in the Terms of Reference as well as those considered under section The Office of Planning and Strategic Management will arrange the interviews with the stakeholders (both internal and external to the Organisational Unit) The Organisational Unit, in consultation with the Office of Planning and Strategic Management, will organise the travel, accommodation and catering for the Panel in accordance with relevant University policies, procedures and guidelines. 7. PRELIMINARY AND PRE-REVIEW MEETING 7.1. The Preliminary Meeting will involve the Panel and Office of Planning and Strategic Management, and will usually take place at least two to four weeks prior to the review visit (either face-to-face or by teleconference) The Head of the Organisational Unit will be present for part of the meeting to introduce the Self-Evaluation Report and respond to any questions from the Panel The meeting will provide the Panel with the opportunity to discuss: ACU Organisational Unit Review Procedure Page 3 of 6
4 The Self-Evaluation Report and determine if additional information is required ahead of the review visit; The areas for investigation and approach consistent with the Terms of Reference; and The stakeholders for interview and schedule for the review visit The Vice-Chancellor may have a Pre-Review Meeting with the Chair and/or Panel prior to the review visit to discuss the focus and direction of the review. This meeting may also include the relevant Portfolio Head, however, this is at the Vice-Chancellor s discretion. 8. REVIEW VISIT 8.1. The review visit will usually be scheduled for three days, however, it may depend upon the Terms of Reference and size of the Organisational Unit The Chair will be responsible for leading the review, which will include: Ensuring that all Panel members understand their role and responsibilities, in particular, the confidential nature of the review process (including documentation and written submissions); Monitoring time and ensuring all appropriate questions are asked in line with the Terms of Reference; Determining whether additional information and/or interviews are required; and Drafting the recommendations and overseeing the development of the Draft Review Report in consultation with the Panel members In line with the Terms of Reference, the review visit should include interviews with the Portfolio Head, Head of the Organisational Unit, a selection of academic and/or professional staff, students (where appropriate) and any key external stakeholders The review visit should conclude with two close-out meetings. The Panel will meet with the Vice-Chancellor to provide a summary of the review findings and proposed draft recommendations. This meeting may also include the relevant Portfolio Head, however, this is at the Vice-Chancellor s discretion. The Panel will also meet with the Head of the Organisational Unit to provide a general overview of the review. 9. DRAFT AND FINAL REVIEW REPORT 9.1. The Draft Review Report should be developed by the Panel and should be a concise, evidencebased document, usually no more than 8,000 words in length (excluding the appendices and any supporting material) Once confirmed by the Panel, the Draft Review Report will be provided to the Portfolio Head and Head of the Organisational Unit for comment and to check the factual accuracy of the report. ACU Organisational Unit Review Procedure Page 4 of 6
5 The Head of the Organisational Unit, in consultation with their Executive Management Team 4 (as appropriate), may seek clarification from the Panel, however, any proposed amendments to the Draft Review Report must be endorsed by the Portfolio Head The requested amendments and comments will be provided to the Panel for consideration, who will determine whether any changes are made to the Draft Review Report The Draft Review Report will be provided to the Chair of the Planning, Quality and Risk Committee to consider whether: a. The draft recommendations include major workplace changes that would result in significant effects for staff that would require consultation in line with the Fair Work Act; b. There are potential impacts on other Organisational Units; and c. The review process and development of the Draft Review Report was conducted in accordance with the relevant University policies and procedures The Draft Review Report will be provided to the Vice-Chancellor for comment and to formally accept the Final Review Report on behalf of the University (usually within eight weeks of the review visit) Once accepted by the Vice-Chancellor, the Panel, Portfolio Head, Chair of the Planning, Quality and Risk Committee and Head of the Organisational Unit will receive a copy of the Final Review Report The Final Review Report will be provided to the Planning, Quality and Risk Committee at the next available meeting. 10. RESPONSE PLAN The Portfolio Head and Head of the Organisational Unit, in consultation with the Chair of the Planning, Quality and Risk Committee (as appropriate), will determine whether the recommendations include major workplace changes including impact on other Organisational Units that would result in significant effects for staff that would require consultation in line with the Fair Work Act The Head of the Organisational Unit, in consultation with the Portfolio Head, will contact the relevant stakeholders (including Human Resources where appropriate) to discuss the recommendations in question and ask for input into the Response Plan as appropriate Any change management provisions outlined in the Response Plan will be carried out in accordance with the University s relevant policies and agreements (including the University Staff Enterprise Agreement) The Head of the Organisational Unit, in consultation with their Management Team (as appropriate), will prepare the Response Plan (using the approved template) to the Final Review Report. 4 This will differ for each Organisational Unit, however, may include the Faculty Executive team, Associate Directors and Managers as required. ACU Organisational Unit Review Procedure Page 5 of 6
6 The Response Plan will be developed in light of the Organisational Unit s current budget allocations. If additional funding is required by the Organisational Unit, a budget submission must be provided to the Budget Advisory Committee for approval The Response Plan will be endorsed by the Portfolio Head and approved by the Vice-Chancellor in principle, subject to advice from the Planning, Quality and Risk Committee. This is usually within eight weeks of the Final Review Report being signed-off on by the Vice-Chancellor The Response Plan will be provided to the Planning, Quality and Risk Committee for: a. Endorsement of the planned activities in line with the recommendations; b. Comment/input in relation to the potential impact(s) of the planned activities on other Organisational Units; and c. Approval to publish the suite of review documents on the Office of Planning and Strategic Management SharePoint site Academic Board and ACU Staff Consultative Committee will be notified once the suite of review documents is due to be published The suite of review documents, which includes the Self-Evaluation Report, Final Review Report and Response Plan, will be published on the SharePoint site and made available to all ACU staff. 11. PROGRESS UPDATE(S) A Progress Update will be developed annually by the Head of the Organisational Unit (using the approved the Response Plan template) and endorsed by the Portfolio Head A Progress Update (summary) will be developed by the Office of Planning and Strategic Management and provided to the Planning, Quality and Risk Committee The Planning, Quality and Risk Committee will determine whether any changes or amendments to the Response Plan require approval from the Vice-Chancellor Subject to approval by the Vice-Chancellor (where appropriate), the Planning, Quality and Risk Committee will approve the publication of the Progress Update (summary) on the Office of Planning and Strategic Management staff site The Head of the Organisational Unit will be invited to provide a verbal update to the Planning, Quality and Risk Committee in support of the annual Progress Update The Progress Updates will cease upon either: a. The conclusion of the Response Plan; b. The commencement of a subsequent (new) review; or c. Any remaining (uncompleted) actions from the Response Plan are deemed as no longer relevant by the Vice-Chancellor and/or Planning, Quality and Risk Committee. 12. REVIEW OF THIS PROCEDURE This Procedure will be reviewed every five years or more frequently if appropriate. ACU Organisational Unit Review Procedure Page 6 of 6
Chapter 2. University Committee Structure
Chapter 2 University Structure 2. UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE STRUCTURE This chapter provides details of the membership and terms of reference of Senate, the University s senior academic committee, and its Standing
More informationNew Graduate Program Proposal Review Process. Development of the Preliminary Proposal
New Graduate Program Proposal Review Process Development of the Preliminary Proposal The preparation of new graduate programs should be initiated by the interested faculty members in consultation with
More informationMandatory Review of Social Skills Qualifications. Consultation document for Approval to List
Mandatory Review of Social Skills Qualifications Consultation document for Approval to List February 2015 Prepared by: National Qualifications Services on behalf of the Social Skills Governance Group 1
More informationDOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL Overview of the Doctor of Philosophy Board The Doctor of Philosophy Board (DPB) is a standing committee of the Johns Hopkins University that reports
More informationRecognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Policy
Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Policy Scope This policy is applicable to Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd, (KBS) and applies to individuals enrolled in KBS courses. Purpose Recognition of Prior Learning
More informationb) Allegation means information in any form forwarded to a Dean relating to possible Misconduct in Scholarly Activity.
University Policy University Procedure Instructions/Forms Integrity in Scholarly Activity Policy Classification Research Approval Authority General Faculties Council Implementation Authority Provost and
More informationHDR Presentation of Thesis Procedures pro-030 Version: 2.01
HDR Presentation of Thesis Procedures pro-030 To be read in conjunction with: Research Practice Policy Version: 2.01 Last amendment: 02 April 2014 Next Review: Apr 2016 Approved By: Academic Board Date:
More informationGuidelines for Incorporating Publication into a Thesis. September, 2015
Guidelines for Incorporating Publication into a Thesis September, 2015 Contents 1 Executive Summary... 2 2 More information... 2 3 Guideline Provisions... 2 3.1 Background... 2 3.2 Key Principles... 3
More informationTHE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG WORKING PARTY ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE REVIEW PANEL ON UNIVERSITY GOVERNANCE. Report of the Working Party
THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG WORKING PARTY ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE REVIEW PANEL ON UNIVERSITY GOVERNANCE Report of the Working Party Introduction 1 This is the report of the Working Party on the Recommendations
More informationUSC VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
USC VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING APPOINTMENTS, PROMOTIONS AND TENURE (APT) GUIDELINES Office of the Dean USC Viterbi School of Engineering OHE 200- MC 1450 Revised 2016 PREFACE This document serves as
More informationStudent Assessment Policy: Education and Counselling
Student Assessment Policy: Education and Counselling Title: Student Assessment Policy: Education and Counselling Author: Academic Dean Approved by: Academic Board Date: February 2014 Review date: February
More informationREGULATIONS FOR POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH STUDY. September i -
REGULATIONS FOR POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH STUDY September 2013 - i - REGULATIONS FOR POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH STUDY Approved by CIT Academic Council, April 2013 - ii - TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION: THE RESEARCH
More informationSTUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY
STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY Contents: 1.0 GENERAL PRINCIPLES 2.0 FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION 3.0 IMPACT ON PARTNERS IN EDUCATION 4.0 FAIR ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION PRACTICES 5.0
More informationRecognition of Prior Learning
Page 1 of 19 Recognition of Prior Learning ACADEMIC POLICY Approved by Academic Council on 25 th April 2012 Version number: v5 Last updated: 25 th April 2012 Page 2 of 19 Policy Title Recognition of Prior
More informationNavitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education February 2014 Annex: Birmingham City University International College Introduction
More informationStakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)
Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP) Summary box REVIEW TITLE 3ie GRANT CODE AUTHORS (specify review team members who have completed this form) FOCAL POINT (specify primary contact for
More informationTeaching Excellence Framework
Teaching Excellence Framework Role specification: Subject Pilot and Year Three Panel members and assessors 13 September 2017 Contents Background... 2 Introduction... 2 Application process... 3 Subject
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. By-Law 1: The Faculty Council...3
FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, University of Ottawa Faculty By-Laws (November 21, 2017) TABLE OF CONTENTS By-Law 1: The Faculty Council....3 1.1 Mandate... 3 1.2 Members... 3 1.3 Procedures for electing Faculty
More informationCode of Practice on Freedom of Speech
Code of Practice on Freedom of Speech Rev Date Purpose of Issue / Description of Change Equality Impact Assessment Completed 1. October 2011 Initial Issue 2. 8 th June 2015 Revision version 2 28 th July
More informationRecognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Procedure - Higher Education
Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Procedure - Higher Education Version: 6.4 Effective Date: 5 August 2016 Procedure Code: PR-030 Related Policy Code: ACA-001 Related Policy Name: Educational Pathways
More informationRaj Soin College of Business Bylaws
Raj Soin College of Business Bylaws Approved October 8, 2002 Amended June 8, 2010 Amended January 30, 2013 These bylaws establish policies and procedures required by the Collective Bargaining Agreement.
More informationIndiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process
Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning ICPBL Certification mission is to PBL Certification Process ICPBL Processing Center c/o CELL 1400 East Hanna Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46227 (317) 791-5702
More informationTHE QUEEN S SCHOOL Whole School Pay Policy
The Queen s Church of England Primary School Encouraging every child to reach their full potential, nurtured and supported in a Christian community which lives by the values of Love, Compassion and Respect.
More informationHigher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College
Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd April 2016 Contents About this review... 1 Key findings... 2 QAA's judgements about... 2 Good practice... 2 Theme: Digital Literacies...
More informationQuality assurance of Authority-registered subjects and short courses
Quality assurance of Authority-registered subjects and short courses 170133 The State of Queensland () 2017 PO Box 307 Spring Hill QLD 4004 Australia 154 Melbourne Street, South Brisbane Phone: (07) 3864
More informationThis Access Agreement covers all relevant University provision delivered on-campus or in our UK partner institutions.
UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE ACCESS AGREEMENT 2011/12 1 Overview The University of Hertfordshire has a strong track record of success in raising aspirations and thus in widening participation. This is amply
More informationCollege of Business University of South Florida St. Petersburg Governance Document As Amended by the College Faculty on February 10, 2014
College of Business University of South Florida St. Petersburg Governance Document As Amended by the College Faculty on February 10, 2014 Administrative Structure for Academic Policy Purpose: The administrative
More informationPreliminary Report Initiative for Investigation of Race Matters and Underrepresented Minority Faculty at MIT Revised Version Submitted July 12, 2007
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Preliminary Report Initiative for Investigation of Race Matters and Underrepresented Minority Faculty at MIT Revised Version Submitted July 12, 2007 Race Initiative
More informationEmbedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
Bellerbys Educational Services Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education May 2012 Annex 2: University of Huddersfield International Study
More informationDiscrimination Complaints/Sexual Harassment
Discrimination Complaints/Sexual Harassment Original Implementation: September 1990/February 2, 1982 Last Revision: July 17, 2012 General Policy Guidelines 1. Purpose: To provide an educational and working
More informationPOST-16 LEVEL 1 DIPLOMA (Pilot) Specification for teaching from September 2013
POST-16 LEVEL 1 DIPLOMA (Pilot) Specification for teaching from September 2013 Contents Page 1. Introduction and Rationale 3 1.1 Qualification Title and Codes 3 1.2 Rationale 3 1.3 Structure of the Qualification
More informationAccreditation of Prior Experiential and Certificated Learning (APECL) Guidance for Applicants/Students
Accreditation of Prior Experiential and Certificated Learning (APECL) Guidance for Applicants/Students The following guidance notes set provide an overview for applicants and students in relation to making
More informationGuidelines for Mobilitas Pluss top researcher grant applications
Annex 1 APPROVED by the Management Board of the Estonian Research Council on 23 March 2016, Directive No. 1-1.4/16/63 Guidelines for Mobilitas Pluss top researcher grant applications 1. Scope The guidelines
More informationSt. Mary Cathedral Parish & School
Parish School Governance St. Mary Cathedral Parish & School School Advisory Council Constitution Approved by Parish Pastoral Council April 25, 2014 -i- Constitution of the St. Mary Cathedral School Advisory
More informationCAUL Principles and Guidelines for Library Services to Onshore Students at Remote Campuses to Support Teaching and Learning
CAUL Principles and Guidelines for Library Services to Onshore Students at Remote Campuses to Support Teaching and Learning Context The following guidelines have been developed as an aid for Australian
More information2. Related Documents (refer to policies.rutgers.edu for additional information)
Policy Name: Clinical Affiliation Agreements Approval Authority: RBHS Chancellor Originally Issued: Revisions: 6/20/13 1. Who Should Read This Policy All Rutgers University research faculty and staff within
More informationP920 Higher Nationals Recognition of Prior Learning
P920 Higher Nationals Recognition of Prior Learning 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Peterborough Regional College is committed to ensuring the decision making process and outcomes for admitting students with prior
More informationUniversity of Essex NOVEMBER Institutional audit
University of Essex NOVEMBER 2003 Institutional audit Published by Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education Southgate House Southgate Street Gloucester GL1 1UB Tel 01452 557000 Fax 01452 557070 Email
More informationUNIVERSITY OF DAR-ES-SALAAM OFFICE OF VICE CHANCELLOR-ACADEMIC DIRECTORATE OF POSTGRADUATE STUDIUES
UNIVERSITY OF DAR-ES-SALAAM OFFICE OF VICE CHANCELLOR-ACADEMIC DIRECTORATE OF POSTGRADUATE STUDIUES GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS FOR PLAGIARISM AND DEPLOYMENT OF POSTGRADUATE STUDENTS FOR TEACHING OR TECHNICAL
More informationVI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status
University of Baltimore VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status Approved by University Faculty Senate 2/11/09 Approved by Attorney General s Office 2/12/09 Approved by Provost 2/24/09
More informationINDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA.
Education Act 1983 (Consolidated to No 13 of 1995) [lxxxiv] Education Act 1983, INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA. Being an Act to provide for the National Education System and to make provision (a)
More informationHigher Education Review of University of Hertfordshire
Higher Education Review of University of Hertfordshire December 2015 Contents About this review... 1 Key findings... 2 QAA's judgements about the University of Hertfordshire... 2 Good practice... 2 Affirmation
More informationUniversity of Toronto
University of Toronto OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT AND PROVOST Framework for the Divisional Appeals Processes The purpose of the Framework is to provide guidance and advice for the establishment of appropriate
More informationContents I. General Section 1 Purpose of the examination and objective of the program Section 2 Academic degree Section 3
Examination Regulations for the Masters Degree Program in Applied Neurosciences in Sports & Exercise in the Faculty of Natural Sciences at Paderborn University of xx.xx.xxxx On the basis of Section 2 para.
More informationGuidelines for Mobilitas Pluss postdoctoral grant applications
Annex 1 APPROVED by the Management Board of the Estonian Research Council on 23 March 2016, Directive No. 1-1.4/16/63 Guidelines for Mobilitas Pluss postdoctoral grant applications 1. Scope The guidelines
More informationRules of Procedure for Approval of Law Schools
Rules of Procedure for Approval of Law Schools Table of Contents I. Scope and Authority...49 Rule 1: Scope and Purpose... 49 Rule 2: Council Responsibility and Authority with Regard to Accreditation Status...
More informationSPORTS POLICIES AND GUIDELINES
April 27, 2010 SPORTS POLICIES AND GUIDELINES I. POLICY AND INTENT A. Eligibility Residents of Scarsdale and the Mamaroneck Strip ( residents of Scarsdale ) and students who attend the Scarsdale Public
More informationProgramme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate
Programme Specification MSc in International Real Estate IRE GUIDE OCTOBER 2014 ROYAL AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, CIRENCESTER PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MSc International Real Estate NB The information contained
More informationROLE DESCRIPTION. Name of Employee. Team Leader ICT Projects Date appointed to this position 2017 Date under review Name of reviewer
ROLE DESCRIPTION Position Title ICT Trainer Name of Employee Grade PO Reports to Team Leader ICT Projects Date appointed to this position 2017 Date under review Name of reviewer Purpose: This position
More informationGeneral rules and guidelines for the PhD programme at the University of Copenhagen Adopted 3 November 2014
General rules and guidelines for the PhD programme at the University of Copenhagen Adopted 3 November 2014 Contents 1. Introduction 2 1.1 General rules 2 1.2 Objective and scope 2 1.3 Organisation of the
More informationASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)
Employee Services P 4979 1230 F 4979 1369 POSITION DESCRIPTION ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12) REF NO: 7081 POSITION DESCRIPTION REPORTS TO Director of Schools PURPOSE The Assistant Director of Schools
More informationINFORMATION PACKAGE FOR PRINCIPAL SAINTS CATHOLIC COLLEGE JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY
INFORMATION PACKAGE FOR PRINCIPAL SAINTS CATHOLIC COLLEGE JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY Saints Residential College is situated on James Cook University s Townsville campus. The college offers a vibrant home-away-from-home
More informationREPORT OF THE PROVOST S REVIEW PANEL. Clinical Practices and Research in the Department of Neurological Surgery June 27, 2013
REPORT OF THE PROVOST S REVIEW PANEL Clinical Practices and Research in the Department of Neurological Surgery June 27, 2013 Executive Summary In August 2012 the Provost and Executive Vice Chancellor convened
More informationMeeting of the Senatus Researcher Experience Committee to be held on Thursday, 27 May 2010 at 2.15 p.m. in the Lord Provost Elder Room, Old College
H/02/26/02 REC: 27.5.10. Meeting of the Senatus Researcher Experience Committee to be held on Thursday, 27 May 2010 at 2.15 p.m. in the Lord Provost Elder Room, Old College A G E N D A 1. The University
More informationBY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
BY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA BY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA Table
More informationARTICLE IV: STUDENT ACTIVITIES
ARTICLE IV: STUDENT ACTIVITIES Table of Contents 7-4.1 extracurricular Activities: Generally 7-4.2 sportsmanship, ethics and integrity 7-4.3 student publications 7-4.4 assemblies 7-4.5 clubs and student
More informationIdsall External Examinations Policy
Idsall External Examinations Policy Sponsorship & Review 1 Sponsor Mr D Crichton, Deputy Headteacher 2 Written and Approved October 2014 3 Next Review Date October 2016 This policy should be read in conjunction
More informationSOAS Student Disciplinary Procedure 2016/17
SOAS Student Disciplinary Procedure 2016/17 1 Introduction and general principles 1.1 Persons registering as students of SOAS become members of the School and as such commit themselves to abiding by its
More informationCONSULTATION ON THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE COMPETENCY STANDARD FOR LICENSED IMMIGRATION ADVISERS
CONSULTATION ON THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE COMPETENCY STANDARD FOR LICENSED IMMIGRATION ADVISERS Introduction Background 1. The Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 (the Act) requires anyone giving advice
More informationProgramme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT
Programme Specification BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT D GUIDE SEPTEMBER 2016 ROYAL AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, CIRENCESTER PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT NB The information contained
More informationPractice Learning Handbook
Southwest Regional Partnership 2 Step Up to Social Work University of the West of England Holistic Assessment of Practice Learning in Social Work Practice Learning Handbook Post Graduate Diploma in Social
More informationSchool Inspection in Hesse/Germany
Hessisches Kultusministerium School Inspection in Hesse/Germany Contents 1. Introduction...2 2. School inspection as a Procedure for Quality Assurance and Quality Enhancement...2 3. The Hessian framework
More informationKelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)
Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association 2015-2017 Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP) Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association 2015-2017 Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP) TABLE
More informationCurriculum for the Academy Profession Degree Programme in Energy Technology
Curriculum for the Academy Profession Degree Programme in Energy Technology Version: 2016 Curriculum for the Academy Profession Degree Programme in Energy Technology 2016 Addresses of the institutions
More informationPractice Learning Handbook
Southwest Regional Partnership 2 Step Up to Social Work University of the West of England Holistic Assessment of Practice Learning in Social Work Practice Learning Handbook Post Graduate Diploma in Social
More informationThe University of British Columbia Board of Governors
The University of British Columbia Board of Governors Policy No.: 85 Approval Date: January 1995 Last Revision: April 2013 Responsible Executive: Vice-President, Research Title: Scholarly Integrity Background
More informationSTUDENT MISCONDUCT PROCEDURE
STUDENT MISCONDUCT PROCEDURE Policy Hierarchy link Student Code of Conduct Responsible Officer Deputy Vice-Chancellor Academic Contact Officer Superseded Documents File Number 2010/02711 Director, UNSW
More informationIDEA FEDERAL REGULATIONS PART B, Additional Requirements, 2008
IDEA FEDERAL REGULATIONS PART B, Additional Requirements, 2008 Final Rule December 1, 2008 Federal Register, Vol. 73, Number 231 http://www.wrightslaw.com/idea/law/fr.v73.n231.pdf Implementation Date:
More informationUniversity of Toronto
University of Toronto OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT AND PROVOST Governance and Administration of Extra-Departmental Units Interdisciplinarity Committee Working Group Report Following approval by Governing
More informationANNUAL REPORT. The South Australian Law Reform Institute. 1 January December 2012
The South Australian Law Reform Institute ANNUAL REPORT 1 January 2012 31 December 2012 Adelaide Law School Ligertwood Building The University of Adelaide, SA 5005 Telephone: (08) 8313 5582 Facsimile:
More informationHiring Procedures for Faculty. Table of Contents
Hiring Procedures for Faculty Table of Contents SECTION I: PROCEDURES FOR NEW FULL-TIME FACULTY APPOINTMENTS... 2 A. Search Committee... 2 B. Applicant Clearinghouse Form and Applicant Data Sheet... 2
More informationEducation and Training Committee, 19 November Standards of conduct, performance and ethics communications plan
Education and Training Committee, 19 November 2015 Standards of conduct, performance and ethics communications plan Executive summary and recommendations Introduction At its meeting in September 2015,
More informationAssessment of Student Academic Achievement
Assessment of Student Academic Achievement 13 Chapter Parkland s commitment to the assessment of student academic achievement and its documentation is reflected in the college s mission statement; it also
More informationPAPILLON HOUSE SCHOOL Making a difference for children with autism. Job Description. Supervised by: Band 7 Speech and Language Therapist
PAPILLON HOUSE SCHOOL Making a difference for children with autism Job Description Post Title: Speech and Language Therapist Band / Grade: Band 6 equivalent Hours: Full time / Part time Location: Papillon
More informationIntroduction 3. Outcomes of the Institutional audit 3. Institutional approach to quality enhancement 3
De Montfort University March 2009 Annex to the report Contents Introduction 3 Outcomes of the Institutional audit 3 Institutional approach to quality enhancement 3 Institutional arrangements for postgraduate
More informationSchool of Education. Teacher Education Professional Experience Handbook
School of Education Teacher Education Professional Experience Handbook An overall guide for all Teacher Education programs 2017 Published by RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, 2017 Copyright Warning
More informationQualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools
Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools Updated November 2013 DC Public Charter School Board 3333 14 th Street NW, Suite 210 Washington, DC 20010 Phone: 202-328-2600 Fax: 202-328-2661 Table
More informationST PHILIP S CE PRIMARY SCHOOL. Staff Disciplinary Procedures Policy
ST PHILIP S CE PRIMARY SCHOOL Staff Disciplinary Procedures Policy Policy confirmed by the Governing Body of St Philip s CE Primary School on: Date: January 2016 Signature: (Chair of Governors) To be reviewed
More informationEXAMINATIONS POLICY 2016/2017
EXAMINATIONS POLICY 2016/2017 Contents Exam responsibilities. Qualifications offered. Exam series. Exam timetables. Entries, entry details and late entries. Exam fees. Equality Legislation. Access arrangements.
More informationUCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs
UCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs I. General A. Purpose An endowed chair provides funds to a chair holder in support of his or her teaching, research, and service, and is supported by a
More informationOverview. Contrasts in Current Approaches to Quality Assurance of Universities in Australia, the United Kingdom and New Zealand
Contrasts in Current Approaches to Quality Assurance of Universities in Australia, the United Kingdom and New Zealand Presentation to Australian International Education Conference, 9 October 2008 by Greg
More informationMASTER S COURSES FASHION START-UP
MASTER S COURSES FASHION START-UP Postgraduate Programmes Master s Course Fashion Start-Up 02 Brief Descriptive Summary Over the past 80 years Istituto Marangoni has grown and developed alongside the thriving
More informationArticle 15 TENURE. A. Definition
Article 15 TENURE A. Definition Tenure shall mean the right of a FACULTY MEMBER to hold his/her position and not to be removed therefrom except for just cause as hereinafter set forth in this Article or
More informationSacramento State Degree Revocation Policy and Procedure
Sacramento State Degree Revocation Policy and Procedure California State University Sacramento s 1 award of academic credit and Degrees constitutes its certification of student achievement. However, a
More informationAn APEL Framework for the East of England
T H E L I F E L O N G L E A R N I N G N E T W O R K F O R T H E E A S T O F E N G L A N D An APEL Framework for the East of England Developing core principles and best practice Part of the Regional Credit
More informationProfessional Experience - Mentor Information
Professional Experience - Mentor Information EDU40006 Ready to Teach Early Childhood: Practicum 5E Required days: 20 days full time. Any missed days must be made up. Required setting: Preschool Early Childhood
More informationResearch Training Program Stipend (Domestic) [RTPSD] 2017 Rules
Research Training Program Stipend (Domestic) [RTPSD] 1. BACKGROUND RTPSD scholarships are awarded to students of exceptional research potential undertaking a Higher Degree by Research (HDR). RTPSDs are
More informationDirectorate Children & Young People Policy Directive Complaints Procedure for MOD Schools
Directorate Children & Young People Policy Directive 3.2.8 Complaints Procedure for MOD Schools Version 2.0 January 2017 Preface Authorisation 1. This DCYP Policy Directive has been authorised for use
More informationInformation Sheet for Home Educators in Tasmania
HOME EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, Inc. PO Box 245 Petersham NSW 2049 1300 72 99 91 www.hea.edu.au admin@hea.edu.au Information Sheet for Home Educators in Tasmania How the Draft Tasmanian Education Bill 2016
More informationI. General provisions. II. Rules for the distribution of funds of the Financial Aid Fund for students
Rules and Regulations for the calculation, awarding and payment of financial aid for full-time and part-time students with awarding criteria and procedures at the Warsaw Film School I. General provisions
More informationQUEEN ELIZABETH S SCHOOL
QUEEN ELIZABETH S SCHOOL Admissions Criteria and Information a Guide for Parents September 2017 Admissions Queen Elizabeth s School Queen s Road, Barnet, Hertfordshire, EN5 4DQ Telephone Number 020 8441
More informationSixth Form Admissions Procedure
University of Birmingham School Sixth Form Admissions Procedure September 2018 University of Birmingham School Sixth Form Admission Procedures Review Frequency Review date Governing Committee Approved
More informationMANAGEMENT CHARTER OF THE FOUNDATION HET RIJNLANDS LYCEUM
MANAGEMENT CHARTER OF THE FOUNDATION HET RIJNLANDS LYCEUM Article 1. Definitions. 1.1 This management charter uses the following definitions: (a) the Executive Board : the Executive Board of the Foundation,
More informationPresentation Advice for your Professional Review
Presentation Advice for your Professional Review This document contains useful tips for both aspiring engineers and technicians on: managing your professional development from the start planning your Review
More informationIUPUI Office of Student Conduct Disciplinary Procedures for Alleged Violations of Personal Misconduct
IUPUI Office of Student Conduct Disciplinary Procedures for Alleged Violations of Personal Misconduct Preamble IUPUI disciplinary procedures determine responsibility and appropriate consequences for violations
More informationBusiness. Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory in. Specification
Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory in Business Specification Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory Certificate in Business Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory Diploma in Business Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory
More informationEconomics. Nijmegen School of Management, Radboud University Nijmegen
Economics Nijmegen School of Management, Radboud University Nijmegen QANU, October 2012 Quality Assurance Netherlands Universities (QANU) Catharijnesingel 56 PO Box 8035 3503 RA Utrecht The Netherlands
More informationASHMOLE ACADEMY. Admissions Appeals Booklet
ASHMOLE ACADEMY Admissions Appeals Booklet 2017 Ashmole Academy is its own Admissions Authority. Appeals are, therefore, made directly to the school. This booklet explains how you can make an appeal if
More informationSURVEY RESEARCH POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF POLICY REASON FOR THIS POLICY
SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY Volume : APP/IP Chapter : R1 Responsible Executive: Provost and Executive Vice President Responsible Office: Institutional and Community Engagement, Institutional Effectiveness Date
More informationUNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM CODE OF PRACTICE ON LEAVE OF ABSENCE PROCEDURE
UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM CODE OF PRACTICE ON LEAVE OF ABSENCE PROCEDURE 1 Index of points 1. Introduction 2. Definition of Leave of Absence 3. Implications of Leave of Absence 4. Imposed Leave of Absence
More information