Texas Woman's University University Policy Manual
|
|
- Julia Summers
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Texas Woman's University University Policy Manual Policy Name: Post Tenure Review Policy Number: 5.16 Date Passed: December 1997 Date Reviewed: June 2012 Next Review: June 2015 Signed By: Chancellor and President Introduction In order to promote the professional development of faculty and a culture of continuous improvement, Texas Woman s University has, for many years, evaluated the performance of all faculty. The annual performance review, as delineated in the Faculty Handbook, is designed to assess the faculty member s contributions to and competencies in teaching, service, and scholarship. Its purposes are to 1) provide a basis for professional growth and development, 2) recognize past professional performance and provide feedback to faculty who demonstrate a need for improvement, and 3) provide a structure for systematically measuring progress toward achieving promotion and tenure. This annual evaluation of tenured and non-tenured faculty members involves a formal procedure incorporating self-evaluation, student evaluations, administrator evaluation, and, in many academic components, peer evaluation. The review is based on the Faculty Role Profile and Performance Goals, which have been mutually agreed upon by the faculty member and academic administrator and the Annual Performance Review Portfolio, which includes an updated curriculum vitae. These materials receive thorough and careful consideration by the component administrator (i.e., department chair, director, associate dean, or program director), by the dean of the college or school, and by the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs. In addition to the established annual evaluation, faculty members applying for promotion and/or tenure are required to submit comprehensive documentation of their accomplishments in each area of professional responsibility. The performance of the faculty member is evaluated by a component peer review committee, the component administrator, the dean
2 of the college or school, the University Promotion and Tenure Committee, the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs, and the President. This performance review results in a decision either to promote and/or grant tenure or to deny promotion and/or tenure. Faculty members seeking associate or full membership on the Graduate Faculty must meet the criteria established by both the Graduate Council and the component. In order to maintain graduate faculty membership, faculty members undergo a rigorous review every seven years. Since many programs are accredited by professional associations and agencies, the faculty members who teach in those programs are expected to meet the demanding criteria required for accreditation or reaffirmation of accreditation, usually at intervals of five to ten years. Regularly scheduled examinations of the entire institution by the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, the major regional accrediting body, consistently produce praise for the faculty for their effective teaching, advising, and service to students. Texas Woman s University has fostered a culture of regular, systematic evaluation at all levels. Each year faculty evaluate the performance of administrators President, Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs, Associate Vice Presidents, Deans, and component administrators. The results of these evaluations accompany the other material employed by supervisors in assessing the effectiveness of the administrators who report to them. Recognizing the value of comprehensive evaluation in identifying both strengths and areas needing improvement, Texas Woman s University welcomes the continuation of a system of performance review of tenured faculty. Noting the Legislature s stipulation that the process be directed toward the professional development of the faculty member, this policy will strengthen faculty performance, enable faculty members and academic administrators to determine those areas in which each person can contribute most significantly to the achievement of the component s mission, and promote a productive use of the faculty s various skills and talents. Purpose and Standards The purpose of all evaluation is to recognize achievement and provide a basis for professional growth and development so that all persons can successfully fulfill their professional responsibilities. The post-tenure review
3 process applies to all individuals in the University who hold tenure, including those with primarily administrative assignments. The post-tenure review process is designed to be an integral component of the ongoing annual performance review and the promotion and tenure process for faculty, and the annual evaluation process for administrators. This will provide a single, comprehensive faculty development and evaluation process. All tenured faculty, including administrators, are to be evaluated in relation to the individual s assigned professional responsibilities. It should be noted that individuals serve in administrative positions at the pleasure of the immediate supervisor and can be removed from those positions at any time by the supervisor. The post-tenure review policy relates only to the individual s tenure as a faculty member. The standards by which tenured faculty are evaluated are the same standards established by the component faculty for annual review. The time schedule for the review process is the annual review time schedule. Peer Review Committee For purposes of this policy, peers are defined as those individuals who have similar professional responsibilities. The peer review committee, (PRC) for those individuals in faculty positions, is the committee utilized by the component in the promotion and tenure process. For the post-tenure review of component administrators, the dean will appoint a PRC of three individuals holding similar positions. For the post-tenure review of deans and associate vice presidents, the Vice President for Academic Affairs will appoint a PRC of three individuals with similar levels of responsibility. The President will appoint an appropriate PRC for those administrators who report directly to her. In those circumstances, as described below, in which a Professional Development Plan (PDP) is required, the faculty member may nominate one additional tenured faculty member from any TWU academic component for membership on the PRC for the construction and evaluation of the PDP. Process Annual performance review of faculty and administrators will continue under the guidelines already established. Post-tenure review by a peer review committee will be conducted at a minimum of every six years for each
4 individual who holds tenure. Peer review will occur earlier if unsatisfactory performance is documented in the annual review. For those components that currently conduct annual faculty performance review using an elected PRC, the annual faculty evaluation may constitute the post-tenure review in those components that so choose. Those faculty will be subject to the sequence and the time limits of both the informal and formal development plans described below if either their overall performance rating or their performance rating in the area of teaching is Does Not Meet Standards. Annual Review If an annual review, using the established component process, results in a performance rating of Does Not Meet Standards in the area of teaching or if the overall rating is Does Not Meet Standards, the component administrator will establish with the faculty member a mutually agreeable plan to ameliorate the identified area(s) of concern. During the next annual review process (end of year one), the PRC and the academic administrator(s) will evaluate the faculty member s performance and progress toward correcting the area(s) of concern. If this evaluation results in a rating of Satisfactory or above, the faculty member will continue to be evaluated annually using the usual component process. If the PRC and administrator(s) agree that the performance of the faculty member continues to merit a rating of Does Not Meet Standards either in teaching or as an overall rating, a formal professional development plan will be developed. The PDP will be designed jointly by the faculty member, the academic administrator(s), and the PRC. The plan will include, at a minimum, specific deficiencies to be addressed, mutually agreed upon goals to remedy the deficiencies, actions to be taken to achieve the goals, and a time frame to correct the identified deficiencies. The faculty member is obligated to participate in developing the PDP and to make a good faith effort to implement the plan. During the next annual review process (end of year two), the faculty member will be evaluated again by the PRC and the academic administrator(s) to determine if the terms of the PDP have been met. If the PRC and academic administrator(s) agree that the faculty member s performance is satisfactory, the faculty member will continue to be evaluated annually using the usual component process.
5 If the PRC and academic administrator(s) determine that the individual s performance is still below standards, the PDP will be reviewed and renewed or revised. One additional year will be allowed before further action is taken. During the next annual review (end of year three), the faculty member will be evaluated by the PRC and academic administrator(s). If, at that time, the individual s performance is still evaluated as below standards, the PRC and the appropriate academic administrator(s) will recommend to the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs (VPAA) appropriate disciplinary action which might include revocation of tenure and/or employment. A faculty member may be subject to revocation of tenure or other appropriate disciplinary action if incompetency, neglect of duty, or other good cause is determined to be present. The Provost and VPAA will, in consultation with the PRC and the appropriate academic administrator(s), determine the appropriate disciplinary action(s) under this Post-Tenure Review Policy, which might include termination of tenure and/or employment, and will notify the faculty member and the dean of the component of the disciplinary decision in writing. The same general process will be followed for tenured academic administrators. Annual review will be conducted using the established procedures. If the overall evaluation during the annual review is less than satisfactory, the supervisor and administrator will develop a plan to correct deficiencies. During the next annual review (end of year one), the PRC and the supervisor will evaluate the administrator. If there is agreement that the performance is less than satisfactory, a formal PDP will be developed and annual peer review will be used to determine progress. If the performance meets standards during the next annual review, the administrator will continue to be reviewed annually using the usual procedures. If, after two years of peer evaluation, the performance is still determined to be below standards, the administrator will be subject to appropriate disciplinary action, which might include revocation of tenure. Sixth Year Review Those tenured faculty and administrators who receive satisfactory evaluations each year during the annual review will be reviewed by the PRC every six years after the granting of tenure, except in those components that choose to use the elected PRC for annual review. Subsequent to gaining tenure, if an individual is reviewed for promotion by a peer review committee
6 in less than six years, that will be considered a post-tenure review and the next six-year cycle will be from the date of the promotion review. For purposes of the post-tenure review, faculty need only submit the 1) Annual Performance Review Portfolio, 2) Annual Performance Review: Evaluation and Recommendations, and 3) Annual Performance Review: Summary of Recommendations, for the preceding five years. Additional materials may be submitted at the faculty member s discretion. Administrators will submit a current curriculum vitae and any other material deemed appropriate by the individual and the supervisor. If the PRC and the academic administrator(s) give a performance rating of Does Not Meet Standards in the area of teaching or as an overall rating, a PDP will be developed. The PDP will be designed jointly by the faculty member, the academic administrator(s), and the PRC. The plan will include, at a minimum, specific deficiencies to be addressed, mutually agreed upon goals to remedy the deficiencies, actions to be taken to achieve the goals, and a time frame to correct the identified deficiencies. The faculty member is obligated to participate in developing the PDP and to make a good faith effort to implement the plan. During the next three years, the faculty member will be evaluated annually by the PRC and academic administrator(s) to determine if the terms of the PDP have been met. At any time that the PRC and academic administrator(s) agree that the faculty member s performance is satisfactory, the faculty member will then continue to be evaluated annually using the usual component process. If, after three years from the time of the initiation of the PDP, the PRC and academic administrator(s) determine that the individual s performance is still below standards, the PRC and the appropriate academic administrator(s) will recommend to the Provost and VPAA appropriate disciplinary action which might include revocation of tenure and/or employment. A faculty member may be subject to revocation of tenure or other appropriate disciplinary action if incompetency, neglect of duty, or other good cause is determined to be present. The VPAA will, in consultation with the PRC and the appropriate academic administrator(s), determine the appropriate disciplinary action(s) under this Post-Tenure Review Policy, which might include termination of tenure and/or employment, and will notify
7 the faculty member and the dean of the component of the disciplinary decision in writing. Appeal Process For disciplinary actions under this policy, other than revocation of tenure and/or employment, the faculty member may appeal the decision of the Provost and VPAA to the Faculty Grievance Committee (FGC) under the procedures described in the Faculty Handbook for faculty grievances. The written appeal must be received by the Office of the VPAA within ten days after the faculty member received the written decision of the VPAA. The findings of the Faculty Grievance Committee, which may include modification of the disciplinary action, excluding termination, shall be final on this subject and shall not become a recommendation to the President. If the decision of the Provost and VPAA under this policy is for termination of the faculty member s tenure and/or employment, the faculty member may, within ten days after receiving the written decision of the VPAA, elect nonbinding alternative dispute resolution (ADR) as described in Chapter 154, Civil Practice and Remedies Code. The Office of the Provost and VPAA must receive the faculty member s election for ADR within the ten-day period. Days when the University is closed during holidays (Thanksgiving, Christmas, Spring Break) are not counted in computing the time periods under this policy. The ADR is to be completed within sixty days after such election by the faculty member is received by the VPAA, unless the time is extended in writing by mutual agreement of the parties. Further, the parties may mutually agree to another type of ADR in place of the one described above, which also must be completed within the sixty-day period. If ADR was elected and does not resolve the matter, the faculty member, within ten days after receiving written acknowledgement from the Provost and VPAA that ADR has not been successful, may appeal to the TWU University Review Committee (URC), as described below. If ADR was not elected, the faculty member, within ten days after receiving in writing the determination of the Provost and VPAA that the appropriate disciplinary action is termination of tenure and/or employment, may appeal to the URC as described below. The Office of the Provost and VPAA must receive the appeal to the URC within the ten-day period.
8 The appeal to the URC involves a hearing before a hearing committee of the URC. The URC members hearing the appeal may not, however, include any member of the faculty member's department or any person who has been involved in the dismissal process. The URC must set a date for its hearing and notify the parties. The University will present the principal reasons for the termination to the URC in writing a week prior to the hearing, with a copy of the reasons to the person being terminated. In any part of the hearing process, at least three-fourths of the members of the URC shall be required to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Decisions of the URC must be reached on a majority vote, with the number of yes, no, and abstention votes recorded without designating the person who cast the vote. The faculty member whose termination is being considered may choose to be represented at the hearing by a fellow faculty member or by an attorney. The University will be represented by a faculty member or an administrative official chosen by the President. The University may also be represented by an attorney, if the person being heard chooses to be represented by an attorney. The hearing process will involve due regard for the responsibility for giving advance notice of hearings, notice of reasons relied upon for the termination, an opportunity for hearing on those reasons, and other commonly recognized academic due process rights. The strict judicial rules of evidence will not be applied, and the URC may receive all evidence felt to be relevant and material to the issues in the hearing that reasonable persons are accustomed to reply upon. The URC will be asked to rule on whether adequate cause exists for the termination and to report its findings to the President and to the Board of Regents, with a copy to the faculty member. If the finding in the URC s report to the President and to the Board of Regents is that the cause or causes for termination of tenure and employment are not adequate, this determination shall be final. If the finding in the URC s report to the President and to the Board of Regents supports the position that the cause or causes are adequate for termination of tenure and/or employment, the termination will be considered final, subject only to a request for an appeal to the Board of Regents. The URC s report to the President and to the Board of Regents must give specific written reasons for its determination. Within ten days after the faculty member receives written notification of a URC decision supporting termination of tenure and/or employment, the faculty member may request an appeal to the Board of Regents by delivering a written request to the Office of the President. The Board of Regents may
9 either consider the case on its merits or decline to do so. If the Board of Regents declines to consider the case on its merits, it will notify the faculty member of such decision in writing, giving the specific reasons that were cited by the URC for the decision to terminate the faculty member. Should the Board of Regents elect to consider the case on its merits, it will render its decision on the merits in writing, either finding in favor of the faculty member or giving specific reasons for any decision to terminate the faculty member on the basis of the evaluation(s) conducted pursuant to this Post- Tenure Review Policy.
APPENDIX A-13 PERIODIC MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF FACULTY & LIBRARIANS (PMYR) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL
APPENDIX A-13 PERIODIC MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF FACULTY & LIBRARIANS (PMYR) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL PREAMBLE The practice of regular review of faculty and librarians based upon the submission of
More informationVI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status
University of Baltimore VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status Approved by University Faculty Senate 2/11/09 Approved by Attorney General s Office 2/12/09 Approved by Provost 2/24/09
More informationBY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
BY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA BY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA Table
More informationOklahoma State University Policy and Procedures
Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE PROCESS FOR RANKED FACULTY 2-0902 ACADEMIC AFFAIRS September 2015 PURPOSE The purpose of this policy and procedures letter
More informationUSC VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
USC VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING APPOINTMENTS, PROMOTIONS AND TENURE (APT) GUIDELINES Office of the Dean USC Viterbi School of Engineering OHE 200- MC 1450 Revised 2016 PREFACE This document serves as
More informationCollege of Arts and Science Procedures for the Third-Year Review of Faculty in Tenure-Track Positions
College of Arts and Science Procedures for the Third-Year Review of Faculty in Tenure-Track Positions Introduction (Last revised December 2012) When the College of Arts and Sciences hires a tenure-track
More informationKelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)
Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association 2015-2017 Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP) Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association 2015-2017 Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP) TABLE
More informationACADEMIC AFFAIRS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL
ACADEMIC AFFAIRS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL 000 INTRODUCTORY MATERIAL Revised: March 12, 2012 The School of Letters and Sciences (hereafter referred to as school ) Academic Affairs Policies and Procedures
More informationReference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.
PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT FACULTY DEVELOPMENT and EVALUATION MANUAL Approved by Philosophy Department April 14, 2011 Approved by the Office of the Provost June 30, 2011 The Department of Philosophy Faculty
More informationPOLICIES AND PROCEDURES
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON - CLEAR LAKE School of Education POLICIES AND PROCEDURES December 10, 2004 Version 8.3 SCHOOL OF EDUCATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE PREAMBLE...
More informationBYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan
BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1226 ADOPTED 9-24-71 AMENDED 2-3-72 5-31-77 4-26-83 2-10-88 6-7-90 5-5-94 4-27-95
More informationFlorida A&M University Graduate Policies and Procedures
Florida A&M University Graduate Policies and Procedures Each graduate program has a different mission, and some programs may have requirements in addition to or different from those in the Graduate School.
More informationDiscrimination Complaints/Sexual Harassment
Discrimination Complaints/Sexual Harassment Original Implementation: September 1990/February 2, 1982 Last Revision: July 17, 2012 General Policy Guidelines 1. Purpose: To provide an educational and working
More informationGraduate Student Grievance Procedures
Graduate Student Grievance Procedures The following policy and procedures regarding non-grade grievances by graduate students can be adopted or adapted in whole or in part by programs/schools/departments
More informationCollege of Business University of South Florida St. Petersburg Governance Document As Amended by the College Faculty on February 10, 2014
College of Business University of South Florida St. Petersburg Governance Document As Amended by the College Faculty on February 10, 2014 Administrative Structure for Academic Policy Purpose: The administrative
More informationArticle 15 TENURE. A. Definition
Article 15 TENURE A. Definition Tenure shall mean the right of a FACULTY MEMBER to hold his/her position and not to be removed therefrom except for just cause as hereinafter set forth in this Article or
More informationPattern of Administration. For the Department of Civil, Environmental and Geodetic Engineering The Ohio State University Revised: 6/15/2012
Pattern of Administration For the Department of Civil, Environmental and Geodetic Engineering The Ohio State University Revised: 6/15/2012 Table of Contents I Introduction... 3 II Department Mission...
More informationPROGRAM HANDBOOK. for the ACCREDITATION OF INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION LABORATORIES. by the HEALTH PHYSICS SOCIETY
REVISION 1 was approved by the HPS BOD on 7/15/2004 Page 1 of 14 PROGRAM HANDBOOK for the ACCREDITATION OF INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION LABORATORIES by the HEALTH PHYSICS SOCIETY 1 REVISION 1 was approved by
More informationIUPUI Office of Student Conduct Disciplinary Procedures for Alleged Violations of Personal Misconduct
IUPUI Office of Student Conduct Disciplinary Procedures for Alleged Violations of Personal Misconduct Preamble IUPUI disciplinary procedures determine responsibility and appropriate consequences for violations
More informationSacramento State Degree Revocation Policy and Procedure
Sacramento State Degree Revocation Policy and Procedure California State University Sacramento s 1 award of academic credit and Degrees constitutes its certification of student achievement. However, a
More informationI. STATEMENTS OF POLICY
HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND HARVARD SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE PROCEDURES FOR RESOLVING COMPLAINTS OF DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT, OR UNPROFESSIONAL RELATIONSHIPS AND ABUSE OF AUTHORITY I. STATEMENTS OF POLICY
More informationBEFORE THE ARBITRATOR. In the matter of the arbitration of a dispute between ADMINISTRATORS' AND SUPERVISORS' COUNCIL. And
BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR In the matter of the arbitration of a dispute between ADMINISTRATORS' AND SUPERVISORS' COUNCIL And MILWAUKEE BOARD OF SCHOOL DIRECTORS Case 428 No. 64078 Rosana Mateo-Benishek Demotion
More informationDEPARTMENT OF ART. Graduate Associate and Graduate Fellows Handbook
DEPARTMENT OF ART Graduate Associate and Graduate Fellows Handbook June 2016 Table of Contents Introduction-Graduate Associates... 3 Graduate Associate Responsibilities... 4 A. Graduate Teaching Associate
More informationDepartment of Political Science Kent State University. Graduate Studies Handbook (MA, MPA, PhD programs) *
Department of Political Science Kent State University Graduate Studies Handbook (MA, MPA, PhD programs) 2017-18* *REVISED FALL 2016 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION 6 II. THE MA AND PHD PROGRAMS 6 A.
More informationDepartment of Anatomy Bylaws
Department of Anatomy Bylaws Approved: June 9, 2003 Section I. Introduction These Bylaws: 1. provide for faculty participation in the Department, in accordance with the collective bargaining agreement
More informationThe University of Tennessee at Martin. Coffey Outstanding Teacher Award and Cunningham Outstanding Teacher / Scholar Award
The University of Tennessee at Martin Coffey Outstanding Teacher Award and Cunningham Outstanding Teacher / Scholar Award Instructions Nominations and Submissions DESCRIPTION OF AWARDS The Coffey Outstanding
More informationUniversity of Toronto
University of Toronto OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT AND PROVOST Framework for the Divisional Appeals Processes The purpose of the Framework is to provide guidance and advice for the establishment of appropriate
More informationREVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED ON OR AFTER JULY 14, 2014 SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT
REVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED ON OR AFTER JULY 14, 2014 YEAR OF FOR WHAT SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT FIRST DEPARTMENT SPRING 2 nd * DEAN SECOND DEPARTMENT FALL 3 rd & 4
More informationPATTERNS OF ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL EDUCATION & ANATOMY THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
PATTERNS OF ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL EDUCATION & ANATOMY THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY OAA Approved 8/25/2016 PATTERNS OF ADMINISTRAION Department of Biomedical Education & Anatomy INTRODUCTION
More informationCERTIFIED TEACHER LICENSURE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
CERTIFIED TEACHER LICENSURE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2016-2017 DODGE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS USD 443 DODGE CITY, KANSAS LOCAL PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDE Table of Contents 1. General Information -
More informationBY-LAWS of the Air Academy High School NATIONAL HONOR SOCIETY
BY-LAWS of the Air Academy High School NATIONAL HONOR SOCIETY ARTICLE I: NAME AND PURPOSE Section 1. The name of this chapter shall be the Air Academy High School National Honor Society Section 2. The
More informationRegulations for Saudi Universities Personnel Including Staff Members and the Like
Regulations for Saudi Universities Personnel Including Staff Members and the Like Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Higher Education Council General Secretariat Regulations for Saudi Universities Personnel Including
More informationAnthropology Graduate Student Handbook (revised 5/15)
Anthropology Graduate Student Handbook (revised 5/15) 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 3 ADMISSIONS... 3 APPLICATION MATERIALS... 4 DELAYED ENROLLMENT... 4 PROGRAM OVERVIEW... 4 TRACK 1: MA STUDENTS...
More informationTHE BROOKDALE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ONE BROOKDALE PLAZA BROOKLYN, NEW YORK 11212
THE BROOKDALE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ONE BROOKDALE PLAZA BROOKLYN, NEW YORK 11212 AGREEMENT made this day of, 200, between BROOKDALE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER, a not-for-profit Hospital corporation, hereinafter
More informationApproved Academic Titles
Academic Human Resources 130 Day Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 acadhr@cornell.edu www.hr.cornell.edu Approved Academic Titles Professor Associate Professor Assistant Professor Professor Emeritus or Emerita University
More informationSPORTS POLICIES AND GUIDELINES
April 27, 2010 SPORTS POLICIES AND GUIDELINES I. POLICY AND INTENT A. Eligibility Residents of Scarsdale and the Mamaroneck Strip ( residents of Scarsdale ) and students who attend the Scarsdale Public
More informationPolicy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy
Policy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy This document outlines the policy for appointment, evaluation, promotion, non-renewal, dismissal,
More informationInstructions and Guidelines for Promotion and Tenure Review of IUB Librarians
Instructions and Guidelines for Promotion and Tenure Review of IUB Librarians Approved by the IUB Library Faculty June 2012. Future amendment by vote of Bloomington Library Faculty Council. Amended August
More informationUniversity of Michigan - Flint POLICY ON STAFF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND CONFLICTS OF COMMITMENT
University of Michigan - Flint POLICY ON STAFF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND CONFLICTS OF COMMITMENT Introduction SPG 201.65-1 requires the University of Michigan Flint to articulate and disseminate implementation
More informationArt Department Bylaws and Policies Approved 4/24/02
1 Art Department Bylaws and Policies Approved 4/24/02 1. Bylaws 1.1 Department Name: Art Department 1.2 Purpose: The Art Department shares in The System Mission, The Core Mission and The Select Mission
More informationPittsburgh Theological Seminary Faculty Handbook Faculty Rules and Regulations
Faculty Handbook 1 Pittsburgh Theological Seminary Faculty Handbook Faculty Rules and Regulations Revised: July 22, 2010 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Faculty By-Laws I. Faculty Membership... 3 II. The Educational
More informationGRADUATE PROGRAM IN ENGLISH
brfhtrhr GRADUATE PROGRAM IN ENGLISH 1. General Information 2. Program Outline 3. Advising 4. Coursework 5. Evaluation Procedures 6. Grading & Academic Standing 7. Research & Teaching Assistantships 8.
More informationAugust 22, Materials are due on the first workday after the deadline.
August 22, 2017 Memorandum To: Candidates for Third-Year Comprehensive Review From: Tracey E. Hucks, Provost and Dean of the Faculty Subject: Third-year Review Procedures for Spring 2018 The Faculty Handbook
More informationGraduate Handbook Linguistics Program For Students Admitted Prior to Academic Year Academic year Last Revised March 16, 2015
Graduate Handbook Linguistics Program For Students Admitted Prior to Academic Year 2015-2016 Academic year 2014-2015 Last Revised March 16, 2015 The Linguistics Program Graduate Handbook supplements The
More informationAcademic Affairs Policy #1
Academic Institutes and Centers Date of Current Revision: September 23, 2009 Responsible Office: Vice Provost, Research and Public Service Academic Affairs Policy #1 1. PURPOSE This policy provides guidelines
More informationDOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE
Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science 1 DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE Work leading to the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) is designed to give the candidate a thorough and comprehensive
More informationRaj Soin College of Business Bylaws
Raj Soin College of Business Bylaws Approved October 8, 2002 Amended June 8, 2010 Amended January 30, 2013 These bylaws establish policies and procedures required by the Collective Bargaining Agreement.
More informationINDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA.
Education Act 1983 (Consolidated to No 13 of 1995) [lxxxiv] Education Act 1983, INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA. Being an Act to provide for the National Education System and to make provision (a)
More informationResidential Admissions Procedure Manual
Residential Admissions Procedure Manual Effective January 1, 2013 2013 by the Appraisal Institute, an Illinois Not-for-Profit Corporation at 200 W. Madison, Suite 1500, Chicago, Illinois 60606. www.appraisalinstitute.org.
More informationContract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)
Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4) Evidence Used in Evaluation Rubric (5) Evaluation Cycle: Training (6) Evaluation Cycle: Annual Orientation (7) Evaluation Cycle:
More informationMaster of Philosophy. 1 Rules. 2 Guidelines. 3 Definitions. 4 Academic standing
1 Rules 1.1 There shall be a degree which may be awarded an overall grade. The award of the grade shall be made for meritorious performance in the program, with greatest weight given to completion of the
More informationMANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REGULATIONS PURPOSE
MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REGULATIONS PURPOSE The Virginia Supreme Court has established, by Rule of Court, a mandatory continuing legal education program in the Commonwealth of Virginia, which
More informationHamline University. College of Liberal Arts POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL
Hamline University College of Liberal Arts POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL 2014 1 Table of Contents Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section4 Section 5 Section 6 Section 7 Section8 Section 9 REVISION OF THE
More informationCollege of Science Promotion & Tenure Guidelines For Use with MU-BOG AA-26 and AA-28 (April 2014) Revised 8 September 2017
College of Science Promotion & Tenure Guidelines For Use with MU-BOG AA-26 and AA-28 (April 2014) Revised 8 September 2017 Introduction Marshall University Board of Governors (BOG) policies define the
More information(2) "Half time basis" means teaching fifteen (15) hours per week in the intern s area of certification.
16 KAR 7:010. Kentucky Teacher Internship Program. RELATES TO: KRS 156.101, 161.028, 161.030, 161.048, 161.095 STATUTORY AUTHORITY: KRS 161.028(1)(a), 161.030 NECESSITY, FUNCTION, AND CONFORMITY: KRS 161.030(5)
More informationDelaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators
Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators DPAS-II Guide (Revised) for Teachers Updated August 2017 Table of Contents I. Introduction to DPAS II Purpose of
More informationAcademic Affairs Policy #1
Academic Affairs Policy #1 Academic Institutes and Centers Date of Current Revision: April 2017 Responsible Office: Vice Provost for Research and Scholarship 1. PURPOSE This policy provides guidelines
More informationOklahoma State University Policy and Procedures
Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures GUIDELINES TO GOVERN WORKLOAD ASSIGNMENTS OF FACULTY MEMBERS 2-0110 ACADEMIC AFFAIRS August 2014 INTRODUCTION 1.01 Oklahoma State University, as a comprehensive
More informationREVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED PRIOR TO JULY 14, 2014 SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT
REVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED PRIOR TO JULY 14, 2014 YEAR OF FOR WHAT SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT FIFTH DEPARTMENT FALL 6 th & Tenure SENATE DEAN PROVOST, PRESIDENT NOTES:
More informationProposed Amendment to Rules 17 and 22 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai i MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION
RE: Proposed Amendment to Rules 17 and 22 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai i MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION The Supreme Court of Hawai i seeks public comment regarding proposals
More informationDepartment of Communication Criteria for Promotion and Tenure College of Business and Technology Eastern Kentucky University
Department of Communication Criteria for Promotion and Tenure College of Business and Technology Eastern Kentucky University Policies governing key personnel actions are contained in the Eastern Kentucky
More informationDEPARTMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD, SPECIAL EDUCATION, and REHABILITATION COUNSELING. DOCTORAL PROGRAM Ph.D.
DEPARTMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD, SPECIAL EDUCATION, and REHABILITATION COUNSELING DOCTORAL PROGRAM Ph.D. POLICY AND PROCEDURES MANUAL for Interdisciplinary Early Childhood Education Special Education November
More informationCOLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING CLINICAL FACULTY POLICY AND PROCEDURES
1 COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING CLINICAL FACULTY POLICY AND PROCEDURES Definition of Clinical Faculty A Clinical Faculty member in the Department of Marketing (Marketing) is
More informationI. Objectives. A. Degree offered: M.S. B. Discipline: Materials Science and Engineering (MSE)
Materials Science and Engineering Graduate Program Bylaws Washington State University Administrative Home: School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering Last Revised by Faculty 11-16-2012 Last Revised
More informationEMPLOYEE DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
NEPN/NSBA CODE: ACAB-R EMPLOYEE DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT COMPLAINT PROCEDURE The School Committee has adopted this procedure in order to provide a method of prompt and equitable resolution of employee
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. By-Law 1: The Faculty Council...3
FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, University of Ottawa Faculty By-Laws (November 21, 2017) TABLE OF CONTENTS By-Law 1: The Faculty Council....3 1.1 Mandate... 3 1.2 Members... 3 1.3 Procedures for electing Faculty
More informationFACULTY HANDBOOK AND POLICY MANUAL
FACULTY HANDBOOK AND POLICY MANUAL Effective July, 1999 With 2017 Updates MEMBER THE TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I: INTRODUCTION A. Mission Statement... I-1 B. Historical Statement...
More informationIntellectual Property
Intellectual Property Section: Chapter: Date Updated: IV: Research and Sponsored Projects 4 December 7, 2012 Policies governing intellectual property related to or arising from employment with The University
More informationGeneral rules and guidelines for the PhD programme at the University of Copenhagen Adopted 3 November 2014
General rules and guidelines for the PhD programme at the University of Copenhagen Adopted 3 November 2014 Contents 1. Introduction 2 1.1 General rules 2 1.2 Objective and scope 2 1.3 Organisation of the
More informationEducation: Professional Experience: Personnel leadership and management
Cathie Cline, Ed.D. Education: Ed.D., Higher Education, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, December 2006. Dissertation: The Influence of Faculty-Student Interaction on Graduation Rates at Rural Two-Year
More informationACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES
ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES Section 8: General Education Title: General Education Assessment Guidelines Number (Current Format) Number (Prior Format) Date Last Revised 8.7 XIV 09/2017 Reference: BOR Policy
More informationSchool Complaints Policy
Mrs Bland s Infant and Nursery School : Procedure Document Name of Policy: Status: Links to other policies: School Complaints Procedure Recommended other School Complaints Policy Content: Committee responsible
More informationPolicy Name: Students Rights, Responsibilities, and Disciplinary Procedures
Policy Name: Students Rights, Responsibilities, and Disciplinary Procedures Approval Authority: RBHS Chancellor Originally Issued: 06/07/1995 Revisions: 1/10/2010, 4/22/2013 1. Who Should Read This Policy
More informationb) Allegation means information in any form forwarded to a Dean relating to possible Misconduct in Scholarly Activity.
University Policy University Procedure Instructions/Forms Integrity in Scholarly Activity Policy Classification Research Approval Authority General Faculties Council Implementation Authority Provost and
More informationUniversity of Michigan - Flint POLICY ON FACULTY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND CONFLICTS OF COMMITMENT
University of Michigan - Flint POLICY ON FACULTY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND CONFLICTS OF COMMITMENT A. Identification of Potential Conflicts of Interest and Commitment Potential conflicts of interest and
More informationREGULATIONS FOR POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH STUDY. September i -
REGULATIONS FOR POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH STUDY September 2013 - i - REGULATIONS FOR POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH STUDY Approved by CIT Academic Council, April 2013 - ii - TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION: THE RESEARCH
More informationUCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs
UCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs I. General A. Purpose An endowed chair provides funds to a chair holder in support of his or her teaching, research, and service, and is supported by a
More informationGENERAL UNIVERSITY POLICY APM REGARDING ACADEMIC APPOINTEES Limitation on Total Period of Service with Certain Academic Titles
Important Introductory Note Please read this note before consulting APM - 133-0. I. For determining years toward the eight-year limitation of service with certain academic titles, see APM - 133-0 printed
More informationPromotion and Tenure Policy
Promotion and Tenure Policy This policy was ratified by each school in the college in May, 2014. INTRODUCTION The Scripps College of Communication faculty comprises a diverse community of scholar-teachers
More informationPhD Regulations for the Faculty of Law of European University Viadrina
This English version of the PhD regulations of the Faculty of Law of European University Viadrina is for your information only. The legally binding version is the one in German. You may access the German
More informationDEPARTMENT OF MOLECULAR AND CELL BIOLOGY
University of Texas at Dallas DEPARTMENT OF MOLECULAR AND CELL BIOLOGY Graduate Student Reference Guide Developed by the Graduate Education Committee Revised October, 2006 Table of Contents 1. Admission
More informationCHAPTER XXIV JAMES MADISON MEMORIAL FELLOWSHIP FOUNDATION
CHAPTER XXIV JAMES MADISON MEMORIAL FELLOWSHIP FOUNDATION Part Page 2400 Fellowship Program requirements... 579 2490 Enforcement of nondiscrimination on the basis of handicap in programs or activities
More informationJournalism Graduate Students Handbook Guide to the Doctoral Program
Journalism Graduate Students Handbook Guide to the Doctoral Program We offer a Ph.D. degree in the dynamic and diverse field of journalism. With a core research and theory curriculum and an opportunity
More informationMark 10:45 Program Handbook
Mark 10:45 Program Handbook Fall 2016 Spring 2017 Jesus called them together and said, "You know that those who are regarded as rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials exercise
More informationPattern of Administration, Department of Art. Pattern of Administration Department of Art Revised: Autumn 2016 OAA Approved December 11, 2016
Pattern of Administration Department of Art Revised: Autumn 2016 OAA Approved December 11, 2016 Table of Contents I. Introduction... 3 II. Department Mission and Description... 3 III. Academic Rights and
More informationThomas Jefferson University Hospital. Institutional Policies and Procedures For Graduate Medical Education Programs
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital Institutional Policies and Procedures For Graduate Medical Education Programs Table of Contents Dispute Resolution Procedure 1 Duty Hours 2 Duty Hours Requests for
More informationIntervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015
Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State May 2015 The Law - Education Law Section 211-f and Receivership In April 2015, Subpart E of Part EE of Chapter 56 of the Laws of 2015
More informationEducational Leadership and Administration
NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY Educational Leadership and Administration Annual Evaluation and Promotion/Tenure Guidelines Unanimously Approved by Faculty on November 10 th, 2015 ELA Department P & T Policies
More informationUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst
University of Massachusetts Amherst Graduate School PLEASE READ BEFORE FILLING OUT THE RESIDENCY RECLASSIFICATION APPEAL FORM The residency reclassification officers responsible for determining Massachusetts
More informationARLINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS Discipline
All staff members of the Arlington Public Schools have authority to maintain the orderly behavior of students. Students in Arlington Public Schools are expected to demonstrate responsibility and self-discipline
More informationNorthwest-Shoals Community College - Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual 1-1. Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual I. INTRODUCTION
Northwest-Shoals Community College - Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual 1-1 Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual I. INTRODUCTION Northwest-Shoals Community College - Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual 1-2 I. INTRODUCTION
More informationCONSTITUTION COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS
CONSTITUTION COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS PREAMBLE Towson University has a rich tradition of shared governance that promotes learning, scholarship, service and civic engagement. The College of Liberal Arts
More informationCourse and Examination Regulations
OER Ma CSM 15-16 d.d. April 14, 2015 Course and Examination Regulations Valid from 1 September 2015 Master s Programme Crisis and Security Management These course and examination regulations have been
More informationLAKEWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT CO-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES CODE LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES FOR POLICY #4247
Page 2 of 14 LAKEWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT CO-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES CODE PHILOSOPHY It is the desire of the Lakewood School District that each student reach his or her academic potential. The Lakewood School
More informationExclusions Policy. Policy reviewed: May 2016 Policy review date: May OAT Model Policy
Exclusions Policy Policy reviewed: May 2016 Policy review date: May 2018 OAT Model Policy 1 Contents Action to be invoked by Senior Staff in Serious Disciplinary Matters 1. When a serious incident occurs,
More informationThe Policymaking Process Course Syllabus
The Policymaking Process Course Syllabus GOVT 4370 Policy Making Process Fall 2007 Paul J. Bonicelli, PhD Assistant Administrator United States Agency for International Development (USAID) 1300 Pennsylvania
More informationUTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY Policies and Procedures
Page 1 of 15 POLICY TITLE Section Subsection Responsible Office Student Rights and Responsibilities Code Student Affairs Student Clubs and UVUSA Office of the Vice President of Student Affairs Policy Number
More informationSCHOOL OF ART & ART HISTORY
JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY College of Visual and Performing Arts SCHOOL OF ART & ART HISTORY GRADUATE STUDIES HANDBOOK 2010 / 2011 Introduction Welcome to the graduate program in art! This Graduate Studies
More informationMADISON METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
MADISON METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT Section 504 Manual for Identifying and Serving Eligible Students: Guidelines, Procedures and Forms TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION. 1 OVERVIEW.. 2 POLICY STATEMENT 3
More informationThe University of British Columbia Board of Governors
The University of British Columbia Board of Governors Policy No.: 85 Approval Date: January 1995 Last Revision: April 2013 Responsible Executive: Vice-President, Research Title: Scholarly Integrity Background
More information