INTRODUCTION A. Rationale for Program Review B. Departments and Programs Scheduled for Academic Program Review
|
|
- Annice Golden
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Program Review and Assessment Committee Southern Connecticut State University ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW Revised Spring 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION A. Rationale for Program Review B. Departments and Programs Scheduled for Academic Program Review CONTENTS OF REPORT A. Departments with External Accreditation B. Departments without External Accreditation PROCEDURES A. Role of the Department/Program B. Roles of PRAC and UCF in the Program Review Process a. Composition of the Committee b. Schedule and outcomes C. Role of the Office of the Provost/Vice President of Academic Affairs in the Program Review Process D. Role of the Office of Assessment and Planning E. Role of the Office of Institutional Research AMENDMENTS APPENDICES A. Extended review schedule B. Expedited review questions C. PRAC process sample schedule D. Continued quality improvement template E. Information regarding external review 1
2 INTRODUCTION A. Rationale: In order to promote academic excellence and the continuous improvement of academic program quality, Southern Connecticut State University reviews all undergraduate academic programs on a 7- year cycle. The centerpiece of program review is a self-study completed by the department responsible for an academic program. The foci of program review are an overview of the program s mission and activities, an assessment of student learning outcomes and other indicators of quality and productivity, and changes in program that result from this assessment. During the self-study, the department engages in a thoughtful and in-depth self-evaluation of its programs on a common set of questions discussed later in this document. The self-study report is forwarded to the Dean, the Program Review and Assessment Committee (PRAC) of the Undergraduate Curriculum Forum (UCF), and the Provost. The program review process also meets expectations of the New England Association of Schools and Colleges (NEASC), our regional accreditation body, the Board of Regents of the Connecticut State Colleges & Universities System, and the Connecticut General Assembly. To that end, a necessary component of the self-study should be identifying learning outcomes and using data about student performance to make improvements to the program and to guide decision-making. Assessment is also for the benefit of the department, to help identify strengths and weaknesses, improve pedagogy to enhance student learning, petition for necessary support, and develop a plan for ongoing evaluation. The university has departments and programs of all kinds fine arts, applied sciences, social sciences, humanities, interdisciplinary minors, programs that emphasize clinics and field work. The self-study is adaptable for each program; in addition to data supplied by the university, departments might gather data unique to their needs and include these in their self-study. As part of the process, examiners external to the university review the self-study document and complete a site visit (See Appendix E for procedures regarding external reviewers). For programs with external accrediting bodies, the report of the accrediting agency fulfills this requirement. For programs without external accreditation, an external reviewer is required. (See Appendix B for the expedited review form for programs with external accrediting bodies). For programs without external accreditation, PRAC reviews each program based upon the self-study report and the external review submitted, and makes a recommendation to the UCF regarding the status of the program. For programs with external accreditation, PRAC reviews each program based upon the expedited review sheet and the report from the external accrediting body. UCF communicates its decision to the department, the Dean, and the Provost. PRAC does not judge program viability. PRAC evaluates whether programs have established an assessment program and have engaged in meaningful and candid self-reflection. A plan to address recommendations from the review will be developed collaboratively by the department and the Dean. Specific procedures for the review process are described later in this document. 2
3 Procedures and standards for the program review of undergraduate academic programs are implemented and monitored by the Program Review and Assessment Committee (PRAC) of the Undergraduate Curriculum Forum (UCF), with the approval of the full UCF. B. Departments and Programs Scheduled for Academic Program Review: The following academic programs are subject to program review: Undergraduate academic programs based in academic departments for which degrees or certificates are granted; Minors housed in academic departments*; General Education requirement components; Honors College program; Cross-disciplinary, interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary programs, including minors not housed in academic departments.* * During the first cycle of program reviews, for departments that house both majors and minors, the focus will be on the major program(s). Departments will be expected to address all programs in subsequent cycles. The schedule for program review may be found in Appendix A. 3
4 CONTENTS OF REPORT All reports and accompanying documents must be submitted electronically. Please paginate the document. A. Departments with External Accreditation The most recent accreditation site visit will serve as the external review for the SCSU program review. PRAC does not require accredited departments to gather data beyond that expected or required for their external accrediting agency. The self-study report shall include: 1. Expedited review sheet (Appendix B) 2. Self-study sent to the external accrediting agency and accreditation report B. Departments without External Accreditation The self-study shall include: 1. Identification page Name of department, school, chairperson; programs 2. Brief summary of how the self-study was conducted, who was responsible, etc. 3. Report discussing the following questions: a. Who are you and what do you do? b. What are your goals and how do you know you are achieving them? c. How do you use data to improve student performance and guide decision-making? 4. Appendices 5. Report from the external reviewer. Departments that do not have external accreditation must supply the Office of Assessment & Planning with the names of three potential external reviewers. (See Appendix E for more information) The questions are intended to be guidelines, flexible and adaptable to the needs of each department/program. You are not required to include every suggestion. Question 1: Who are you and what do you do? (5 pages maximum, excluding appendices) Use this category to describe the big picture: your program s mission, vision or plans for the future, strengths and weaknesses (e.g., goals for faculty development, goals for student retention, etc.), who your faculty and students are, any special initiatives or achievements you would like to highlight (Is the percentage of your students who are accepted to graduate programs exceptional? Is the employment rate of your students after graduation very high? Are you particularly pleased with graduating life-long learners?), extra-curricular facets of the program. What makes you unique? (Specifics of curriculum and learning outcomes are discussed in the next section, so if you need to discuss curriculum-related issues here, address the macro-level issues and save the micro-level examples for question 2.) 4
5 Some things to include, if they are appropriate for your program, might be: Who are you? What do you do? o Mission Provide a statement of the department/program s mission Does your department house more than one program? Here is the place to explain what they are and how they do, or don t, complement each other. What are the program s goals o Demographics List the names and tenure status of the full-time and adjunct faculty in the department/program. Mention special responsibilities undertaken by faculty such as coordinator or director Discuss student demographics for the past five years. (Data provided by the Office of Institutional Research should go in the appendix but can be discussed here) Discuss how the faculty / student ratio impacts student advising and/or class size. Provide a rationale for the optimal number of faculty. o Creative Activity, Community Service, and Outreach Provide examples of how department / program supports student involvement in creative activity, community service, and outreach appropriate to the mission of the department / program. Suggestions include, but are not limited to: Describe ways in which students are involved in research, scholarly and creative projects (e.g. clubs, organizations, etc.). Describe faculty activities, which foster an intellectual environment involving students (e.g. brown bag lunches, speakers, etc.). Provide examples of students theses or special projects. Provide examples of types of student projects completed, particularly indicating those that were published and those that were collaborative efforts of students and faculty (e.g. joint presentations, publications, exhibits, conference attendance / presentations, etc.). Describe alliances, partnerships, collaborations with community (could include information about service learning projects, internships, etc.). Question 2: What are your goals for student learning and how do you know you are achieving them? (10 pages maximum, excluding appendices) Use this category to describe and discuss details of curriculum. Consider questions like: What are your learning outcomes (that is, what skills, knowledge, and attitudes do you want students to acquire as a result of having gone through your program), how do the courses in your program link together, are there gaps in coverage of learning outcomes, what methods are you using, or planning to use, to determine whether students are making satisfactory progress (see below for examples of direct and indirect methods)? 5
6 Some things to include, if they are appropriate for your program, might be: What are your goals for student learning? Provide a curriculum map or matrix demonstrating how the curriculum introduces and reinforces the skills, knowledge, and attitudes that students are expected to master. Discuss innovations, changes, improvements in your curriculum or curriculum mapping of skills, knowledge, and/or attitudes. Provide an overview of course syllabi. Describe how the program supports the Liberal Education Program (LEP). Discuss your strategies and methods for assessing student learning and/or performance. How do you know your goals for student learning are achieved? What direct and indirect methods do you use? Examples of direct evidence of student learning include: o Locally developed tests administered by program or by the university o Standardized tests o Pre- and post-tests o Essay tests scored across courses o Internally or externally juried review of student projects, internships o Performance on national licensure examinations o Collections of student work (e.g., portfolios) o Course-embedded assessment Examples of indirect evidence of student learning include: o Alumni and employer surveys o Student surveys, focus groups o Exit interviews with graduates o Participation rates in internships, study abroad, other enrichment programs o Graduate follow-up studies o Percentage of students who go on to graduate school o Admission rates to selective programs at the higher degree o Student performance in disciplinary and professional competitions o Retention and transfer studies; job placement statistics Note: Some programs might be undergoing extensive curricular innovations and thus, a majority of evidence for student learning might fall under indirect evidence. In this case, along with indirect evidence, PRAC would require a detailed plan for collecting direct evidence in the next assessment cycle. Question 3. How are you using data to improve student performance and guide decision-making? (5 pages maximum, excluding appendices) The Office of Assessment & Planning and the Office of Institutional Research will supply some data to the department. However, departments might want to collect data of their own or ask OA&P to conduct surveys for them. All data discussed here should go in the appendix. 6
7 Discuss how your department has used the data collected to benefit your program. Discussions must include the following: Reflecting back on the data discussed in Question 2, describe how student learning data are used to improve student performance and how data are used to inform departmental discussions and/or initiate changes to your program. For example, identify opportunities and barriers to program goals, objectives and student outcomes. Given the nature of your program, do you have a reasonable number of majors? Are students able to complete the program in timely fashion? What steps are or could be taken by the department to improve the number of students who complete the program? Reflecting back on Question 1, what is your vision for program improvement? Topics that you may wish to address include: a description of the adequacy and condition of space, technology (e.g. computers, access to high tech classrooms) and unique program components (e.g. practica/internships). What additional resources are crucial to achieving long and short-term goals? What support do you need to fulfill your vision for your program? 7
8 PROCEDURES A. The Department s/program s role in the review process: Establish an assessment committee that includes at least one tenured faculty member (except in cases where the department has no tenured faculty). Meet with the Office of Assessment & Planning at least 4 semesters prior to submitting the selfstudy to establish or update direct measures and learning outcomes. The O&AP can also collect other data if given adequate time in which to do so. Create/update a curriculum map. Receive and analyze data from the Office of Assessment & Planning and the Office of Institutional Research. Submit names of potential external reviewers to the Provost s office 2 semesters before the selfstudy is due. Host the external reviewer s visit and receive the reviewer s report. Write & submit the report. Meet with the Dean and Provost to establish a plan to address support for the program s vision B. Roles of PRAC and UCF in the Program Review Process a. Composition of the committee: The Program Review and Assessment Committee (PRAC) of the UCF is the appropriate body charged with implementing undergraduate program review. The membership of PRAC should consist of members, with representation from each academic school. Efforts should be made to ensure continuity on the committee and to select UCF members with interest and preferably experience with assessment, program evaluation, and/or accreditation. As with any standing committee of the UCF, the Chair of UCF retains the right to assign or dismiss PRAC members. Because of the responsibilities of the PRAC chairperson, as found in the PRAC by-laws, there shall be reassigned time available for this office. b. Schedule and outcomes (see Appendices A & C): Self-studies will be submitted to PRAC in electronic format according to the 7-year schedule (see Appendix A). PRAC will review each program based upon the submitted self-study report and report of the external reviewer(s). The department submitting the report will have an opportunity to meet with PRAC, generally one week after it has forwarded its report to the Committee. The minutes of the meeting will serve as a narrative response and summary to the department, indicating which standards/indicators have been judged as met or not met along with any additional recommendations PRAC deems important to convey. 8
9 If a revised report is requested by PRAC, the department will submit the revised report within one week. If, in the opinion of the Committee, those concerns have not been addressed satisfactorily, the Committee may, at its discretion, recommend that the department be given conditional approval. In general, recommendation from PRAC regarding the department/program being reviewed shall be on the UCF agenda at the second full UCF meeting following the review (or at least three weeks following the PRAC review). Following the review, PRAC will make one of the following recommendations to the full UCF: (1) Continuing approval of the program; or (2) Conditional approval of the program. By a majority vote, the UCF will accept, reject, or table the recommendation from PRAC. The factors leading to continuing approval, or the conditions leading to conditional approval, and the action of the UCF shall be communicated by PRAC to the respective department chairperson, program coordinator(s)/director(s), appropriate academic Dean and Provost/Academic Vice President. The minutes of the UCF meeting shall serve as a written record of the vote. Continuing approval: The program whose report receives continuing approval from the UCF will next be reviewed by PRAC seven years from the date that it submitted its initial report. Conditional approval: Any program granted conditional approval will have up to eleven months from the published date in the Program Review Schedule to address the conditions cited and provide PRAC with a written interim report. During this period, technical assistance will continue to be available from the Office of Assessment and Planning, and the department may consult with PRAC. The interim report addressing the cited conditions will be reviewed by PRAC. The department submitting the report will have an opportunity to meet with PRAC one week subsequent to the submission of the report before the review is completed. No later than one calendar year after previous action by the UCF, PRAC will make one of the following recommendations to the UCF: (1) Continuing approval of the program; or (2) Because of continuing serious deficiencies in meeting the standards/indicators, PRAC cannot recommend continuing approval. In this eventuality, a representative of the affected department will be present at the meeting to present an alternative perspective on the recommendation. Continuing approval recommended: The program whose report receives continuing approval from the UCF will next be reviewed by PRAC seven years from the date that it submitted its initial report. 9
10 Continuing approval not recommended: If continuing approval of a program is denied by a majority vote of the UCF, the UCF will forward to the Dean of the academic school and to the Provost/Academic Vice President the action of the UCF to deny continuing approval of that program with a description of the deficiencies found and recommendations for corrective action. The Dean and the Provost/Academic Vice President will be requested to report their actions regarding the affected department to the full UCF within four academic weeks. Failure to submit a self-study: If a department does not submit the appropriate written report--whether the initial self-study, revision, or interim report--according to the timeline, PRAC will so advise the UCF, which will then grant conditional approval of the program. The Chairperson of PRAC will provide written notification to the Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs, Dean of the appropriate academic school, chairperson of the department, and coordinator(s)/director(s) of the program(s) to request a meeting to outline a schedule for and aid in the successful completion of the review process. Following that meeting, the Dean and the Provost/Academic Vice President will be requested to report their actions regarding the affected department to the full UCF within four academic weeks. C. Role of the Office of the Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs in the Program Review Process In the self-assessment process, programs identify strengths and weaknesses, resource needs, and a vision for the future of the program. PRAC makes recommendations for approval to UCF, but neither body controls resources for program improvement. The Office of the Provost/Vice President of Academic Affairs, however, is in the position to help programs resolve self-identified issues and plans for improvement. The Provost/VP is also in a unique position to gain broader overview across departments and schools, and to identify common areas of concern. Thus, the university administration will provide timely and substantive written response to programs that have completed program reviews. These responses should advance action plans for the program, and be reflected in the university strategic plan. PRAC recommends that the written response be sent to the department chair/program coordinator. See Appendix E for the administrative follow-up template. Southern Connecticut State University is committed to academic excellence and student success. Academic program review is an important means of assessing the quality and continuous improvement of programs. The university recognizes that resources are necessary for the completion of meaningful program reviews. These resources include 1. Reassigned time for the person who coordinates the departmental self- study 2. Reassigned time for PRAC chair 3. Funding for external reviewer(s) 10
11 D. Role of the Office of Assessment and Planning The Office of Assessment & Planning provides assistance in the identification and measurement (direct and indirect) of student outcomes; student, faculty, and alumni surveys; and other data that the department may wish to include in the appendices and refer to in the narrative. E. Role of the Office of Institutional Research The Office of Institutional Research provides access to important documents and institutional data (e.g., university mission/ vision/ strategic plan; data re: department demographics such as number of majors, number of degrees awarded, course enrollments). AMENDMENTS Any changes to this document will be made following the policies and procedures of the UCF. 11
12 APPENDICES Appendix A: Extended Program Review Schedule Review Schedule October November December February March April May Art Management/MIS Econ/Finance Computer Science, Marketing Music, English ** Begins the switch from 5-year to 7-year program review schedule Review Schedule September October November December February March April May Review Schedule September October November December February March April May Review Schedule September October November December February March April May Open meeting with departments coming up for review Accounting and Old Business: Political Science, Music & English Theatre Geography Education and Old Business: Economics and Finance Foreign Languages and Old Business: Marketing Public Health Open meeting with departments and internal review Open meeting with departments coming up for review Old Business History Information and Library Science Anthropology Earth Science Mathematics Open meeting with departments and internal review Open meeting with departments Old Business Liberal Studies Exercise Science Social Work Special Education Communication Open meeting with department and internal review 12
13 *PRAC activity suspended for 2013/14 academic year Review Schedule September October November December February March April Review Schedule September October November December February March April Review Schedule September October November December February March April Review Schedule September October November December February March April Review Schedule September October November December February March April Open meeting with departments Old Business Open meeting Chemistry Recreation and Leisure Sociology Physics Open meeting with departments Open meeting Philosophy Honors College Journalism (begins second cycle) Communication Disorders Biology Interdisciplinary Studies Nursing Psychology Media Studies Political Science Art Accounting Management Marketing Economics/Finance Computer Science Music English Theatre Open meeting Old business Geography Education World Languages & Literature Public Health History 13
14 Appendix B: Expedited review sheet Program Review and Assessment Committee Cover Sheet: Undergraduate Program Review following National Accreditation Name of Department: Professional Accreditation Agency: Date of Accreditation: Standards Comments Page # Where in the document do you describe your program? Where in the document do you discuss learning outcomes, measurements, and how you know you students are achieving the outcomes? Where in the document do you discuss how you use data to improve student learning and guide decision-making? Please attach self-study and accreditation report to this cover sheet. 14
15 Appendix C: Sample PRAC schedule: Sun Monday T Wednesday Thursday F Sat Self-study due to PRAC, Dean, Provost* UCF meeting Minutes/report to department/program rep, UCF Notice of UCF outcome, PRAC minutes/report, revised selfstudy (if any) sent to department/program representative, chair, Dean, Provost Revision, if requested, due to PRAC PRAC meeting to discuss report, standards met or not met, meet with department/program representative UCF meeting PRAC meeting to vote on recommendation UCF meeting, recommendation made** * If a department does not submit the appropriate written report according to the timeline, PRAC will so advise the UCF, which will then grant conditional approval of the program. The Chairperson of PRAC will provide written notification to the Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs, Dean of the appropriate academic school, chairperson of the department, and coordinator(s)/director(s) of the program(s) to request a meeting to outline a schedule for and aid in the successful completion of the review process. **If the recommendation is for: Continuing approval: The department/program reports again in 7 years Conditional approval: The department/program has up to 11 months to submit a revised report 15
16 Appendix D: Continued Quality Improvement This document will be utilized for the meeting between the Provost, Dean, and Chair once UCF (PRAC) or the Graduate Council has completed a program review. Based on the finding, the areas for improvement will be listed below. An annual update of this should be included in the Department s Annual Report. Program Name: Action Item: 1. Current Resources (what can be accomplished with current resources) Additional Resources needed: Timeline - approx. date Communication Plan who is involved; how often Follow up Place on Hold -reason Responsibilities who will do it? Action Item: 2. Current Resources (what can be accomplished with current resources) Additional Resources needed: Timeline - approx. date Communication Plan who is involved; how often Follow up Place on Hold -reason Responsibilities who will do it? 16
17 Action Item: 3. Current Resources (what can be accomplished with current resources) Additional Resources needed: Timeline - approx. date Communication Plan who is involved; how often Follow up Place on Hold -reason Responsibilities who will do it? Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs Date Dean Date Chairperson of Department Date 17
18 Appendix E: Selecting an external reviewer. The department/program will submit the names of at least 3 potential external reviewers to the Dean. Any relationship between a potential reviewer and a department member must be clearly stated. The Office of the Dean will contact nominees to negotiate contract terms, including an honorarium and expenses, determine availability, and will make the ultimate selection from the approved list. Examiners will conduct a site visit, tour all relevant facilities, and meet with constituencies associated with the program. A site visit will also include: Meeting with PRAC Exit meeting with administrative personnel (including Dean). Members of the department, the relevant Dean, and representatives from Academic Affairs, PRAC, and the Office of Assessment and Planning are invited to attend the exit meeting. A subsequent written report will document all findings. Departments are responsible for collecting and communicating any additional data requested by the external examiner prior to the submission of the final report. Sources of external perspectives include feedback from a variety of constituencies, which include, but are not restricted to: Members of other departments within the institution Qualified representatives of other universities Members of accrediting agencies and other professional associations Advisory boards Relevant government agencies Benchmarking data on regional or national performance in applicable areas Survey data from alumni, employers, and other external constituencies 18
Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review
Procedures for Academic Program Review Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review Last Revision: August 2013 1 Table of Contents Background and BOG Requirements... 2 Rationale
More informationCollege of Arts and Science Procedures for the Third-Year Review of Faculty in Tenure-Track Positions
College of Arts and Science Procedures for the Third-Year Review of Faculty in Tenure-Track Positions Introduction (Last revised December 2012) When the College of Arts and Sciences hires a tenure-track
More informationREVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED ON OR AFTER JULY 14, 2014 SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT
REVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED ON OR AFTER JULY 14, 2014 YEAR OF FOR WHAT SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT FIRST DEPARTMENT SPRING 2 nd * DEAN SECOND DEPARTMENT FALL 3 rd & 4
More informationCONSTITUTION COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS
CONSTITUTION COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS PREAMBLE Towson University has a rich tradition of shared governance that promotes learning, scholarship, service and civic engagement. The College of Liberal Arts
More informationACADEMIC AFFAIRS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL
ACADEMIC AFFAIRS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL 000 INTRODUCTORY MATERIAL Revised: March 12, 2012 The School of Letters and Sciences (hereafter referred to as school ) Academic Affairs Policies and Procedures
More informationLaGrange College. Faculty Handbook
LaGrange College Faculty Handbook 2008-2009 (All policies in this Handbook have been approved by the LaGrange College Board of Trustees through either a specific vote of the Board or through the delegation
More informationPolicy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy
Policy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy This document outlines the policy for appointment, evaluation, promotion, non-renewal, dismissal,
More informationLecturer Promotion Process (November 8, 2016)
Introduction Lecturer Promotion Process (November 8, 2016) Lecturer faculty are full-time faculty who hold the ranks of Lecturer, Senior Lecturer, or Master Lecturer at the Questrom School of Business.
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. By-Law 1: The Faculty Council...3
FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, University of Ottawa Faculty By-Laws (November 21, 2017) TABLE OF CONTENTS By-Law 1: The Faculty Council....3 1.1 Mandate... 3 1.2 Members... 3 1.3 Procedures for electing Faculty
More informationHamline University. College of Liberal Arts POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL
Hamline University College of Liberal Arts POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL 2014 1 Table of Contents Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section4 Section 5 Section 6 Section 7 Section8 Section 9 REVISION OF THE
More informationBYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan
BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1226 ADOPTED 9-24-71 AMENDED 2-3-72 5-31-77 4-26-83 2-10-88 6-7-90 5-5-94 4-27-95
More informationASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY The assessment of student learning begins with educational values. Assessment is not an end in itself but a vehicle
More informationREVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED PRIOR TO JULY 14, 2014 SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT
REVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED PRIOR TO JULY 14, 2014 YEAR OF FOR WHAT SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT FIFTH DEPARTMENT FALL 6 th & Tenure SENATE DEAN PROVOST, PRESIDENT NOTES:
More informationUSC VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
USC VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING APPOINTMENTS, PROMOTIONS AND TENURE (APT) GUIDELINES Office of the Dean USC Viterbi School of Engineering OHE 200- MC 1450 Revised 2016 PREFACE This document serves as
More informationPOLICIES AND PROCEDURES
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON - CLEAR LAKE School of Education POLICIES AND PROCEDURES December 10, 2004 Version 8.3 SCHOOL OF EDUCATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE PREAMBLE...
More informationCollege of Education & Social Services (CESS) Advising Plan April 10, 2015
College of Education & Social Services (CESS) Advising Plan April 10, 2015 To provide context for understanding advising in CESS, it is important to understand the overall emphasis placed on advising in
More informationDEPARTMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD, SPECIAL EDUCATION, and REHABILITATION COUNSELING. DOCTORAL PROGRAM Ph.D.
DEPARTMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD, SPECIAL EDUCATION, and REHABILITATION COUNSELING DOCTORAL PROGRAM Ph.D. POLICY AND PROCEDURES MANUAL for Interdisciplinary Early Childhood Education Special Education November
More informationDepartment of Political Science Kent State University. Graduate Studies Handbook (MA, MPA, PhD programs) *
Department of Political Science Kent State University Graduate Studies Handbook (MA, MPA, PhD programs) 2017-18* *REVISED FALL 2016 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION 6 II. THE MA AND PHD PROGRAMS 6 A.
More informationBY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
BY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA BY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA Table
More informationABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs
ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs Mapped to 2008 NSSE Survey Questions First Edition, June 2008 Introduction and Rationale for Using NSSE in ABET Accreditation One of the most common
More informationACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES
ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES Section 8: General Education Title: General Education Assessment Guidelines Number (Current Format) Number (Prior Format) Date Last Revised 8.7 XIV 09/2017 Reference: BOR Policy
More informationReference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.
PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT FACULTY DEVELOPMENT and EVALUATION MANUAL Approved by Philosophy Department April 14, 2011 Approved by the Office of the Provost June 30, 2011 The Department of Philosophy Faculty
More informationAugust 22, Materials are due on the first workday after the deadline.
August 22, 2017 Memorandum To: Candidates for Third-Year Comprehensive Review From: Tracey E. Hucks, Provost and Dean of the Faculty Subject: Third-year Review Procedures for Spring 2018 The Faculty Handbook
More informationUniversity of Toronto
University of Toronto OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT AND PROVOST Governance and Administration of Extra-Departmental Units Interdisciplinarity Committee Working Group Report Following approval by Governing
More informationDepartment of Communication Criteria for Promotion and Tenure College of Business and Technology Eastern Kentucky University
Department of Communication Criteria for Promotion and Tenure College of Business and Technology Eastern Kentucky University Policies governing key personnel actions are contained in the Eastern Kentucky
More informationUniversity of New Hampshire Policies and Procedures for Student Evaluation of Teaching (2016) Academic Affairs Thompson Hall
University of New Hampshire Policies and Procedures for Student Evaluation of Teaching (2016) Academic Affairs Thompson Hall 603-862-3290 I. PURPOSE This document sets forth policies and procedures for
More informationPromotion and Tenure Guidelines. School of Social Work
Promotion and Tenure Guidelines School of Social Work Spring 2015 Approved 10.19.15 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction..3 1.1 Professional Model of the School of Social Work...3 2.0 Guiding Principles....3
More informationDoctoral GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE STUDY
Doctoral GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE STUDY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATION STUDIES Southern Illinois University, Carbondale Carbondale, Illinois 62901 (618) 453-2291 GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE STUDY DEPARTMENT OF
More informationJohn Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY ASSESSMENT REPORT: SPRING Undergraduate Public Administration Major
John Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY ASSESSMENT REPORT: SPRING 203 Undergraduate Public Administration Major Maria J. D'Agostino 06.30.203 ANNUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT FALL 20 SPRING 202 2 I. ASSESSMENT
More informationIndividual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK
Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program at Washington State University 2017-2018 Faculty/Student HANDBOOK Revised August 2017 For information on the Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program
More informationCOLLEGE OF SCIENCES & HUMANITIES DEPARTMENT CHAIR HANDBOOK
COLLEGE OF SCIENCES & HUMANITIES DEPARTMENT CHAIR HANDBOOK Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 1 Department Chair Position Description... 1 Department Chair Academic Load and Schedule... 2 Department Chair
More informationSTRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM INFORMATION FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM INFORMATION FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS The Structural Engineering graduate program at Clemson University offers Master of Science and Doctor of Philosophy degrees in Civil Engineering.
More informationSaint Louis University Program Assessment Plan. Program Learning Outcomes Curriculum Mapping Assessment Methods Use of Assessment Data
Saint Louis University Program Assessment Plan Program (Major, Minor, Core): Sociology Department: Anthropology & Sociology College/School: College of Arts & Sciences Person(s) Responsible for Implementing
More informationVI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status
University of Baltimore VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status Approved by University Faculty Senate 2/11/09 Approved by Attorney General s Office 2/12/09 Approved by Provost 2/24/09
More informationContract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)
Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4) Evidence Used in Evaluation Rubric (5) Evaluation Cycle: Training (6) Evaluation Cycle: Annual Orientation (7) Evaluation Cycle:
More informationArt Department Bylaws and Policies Approved 4/24/02
1 Art Department Bylaws and Policies Approved 4/24/02 1. Bylaws 1.1 Department Name: Art Department 1.2 Purpose: The Art Department shares in The System Mission, The Core Mission and The Select Mission
More informationMeek School of Journalism and New Media Will Norton, Jr., Professor and Dean Mission. Core Values
Meek School of Journalism and New Media Will Norton, Jr., Professor and Dean 2009-2010 Mission The School of Journalism and New Media at the University of Mississippi has as its primary mission the education
More informationRevision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience
Revision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience Revision of Core Program In 2009 a Core Curriculum Task Force with representatives from every academic division was appointed by
More informationRaj Soin College of Business Bylaws
Raj Soin College of Business Bylaws Approved October 8, 2002 Amended June 8, 2010 Amended January 30, 2013 These bylaws establish policies and procedures required by the Collective Bargaining Agreement.
More informationIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Chief Academic Officer s Guidelines For Preparing and Reviewing Promotion and Tenure Dossiers
Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Chief Academic Officer s Guidelines For Preparing and Reviewing Promotion and Tenure Dossiers 2018-2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 4 Distinctions between
More informationAssessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)
Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011) Health professions education programs - Conceptual framework The University of Rochester interdisciplinary program in Health Professions
More informationThe University of Tennessee at Martin. Coffey Outstanding Teacher Award and Cunningham Outstanding Teacher / Scholar Award
The University of Tennessee at Martin Coffey Outstanding Teacher Award and Cunningham Outstanding Teacher / Scholar Award Instructions Nominations and Submissions DESCRIPTION OF AWARDS The Coffey Outstanding
More informationGoal #1 Promote Excellence and Expand Current Graduate and Undergraduate Programs within CHHS
Goal #1 Promote Excellence and Expand Current Graduate and Undergraduate Programs within CHHS Objectives Actions Outcome Responsibility Objective 1 Develop innovative alternative methodologies for educational
More informationHigher Education / Student Affairs Internship Manual
ELMP 8981 & ELMP 8982 Administrative Internship Higher Education / Student Affairs Internship Manual College of Education & Human Services Department of Education Leadership, Management & Policy Table
More informationPREPARING FOR THE SITE VISIT IN YOUR FUTURE
PREPARING FOR THE SITE VISIT IN YOUR FUTURE ARC-PA Suzanne York SuzanneYork@arc-pa.org 2016 PAEA Education Forum Minneapolis, MN Saturday, October 15, 2016 TODAY S SESSION WILL INCLUDE: Recommendations
More informationDavidson College Library Strategic Plan
Davidson College Library Strategic Plan 2016-2020 1 Introduction The Davidson College Library s Statement of Purpose (Appendix A) identifies three broad categories by which the library - the staff, the
More informationEducational Leadership and Administration
NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY Educational Leadership and Administration Annual Evaluation and Promotion/Tenure Guidelines Unanimously Approved by Faculty on November 10 th, 2015 ELA Department P & T Policies
More informationSURVEY RESEARCH POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF POLICY REASON FOR THIS POLICY
SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY Volume : APP/IP Chapter : R1 Responsible Executive: Provost and Executive Vice President Responsible Office: Institutional and Community Engagement, Institutional Effectiveness Date
More informationWildlife, Fisheries, & Conservation Biology
Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, & Conservation Biology The Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, & Conservation Biology in the College of Natural Sciences, Forestry and Agriculture offers graduate study
More informationOhio Valley University New Major Program Proposal Template
Ohio Valley University New Major Program Proposal Template Information must be submitted as one document. The proposal must include in sequential order all applicable elements (1-14) listed below. Please
More informationPROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program
PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM Institution Submitting Proposal Degree Designation as on Diploma Title of Proposed Degree Program EEO Status CIP Code Academic Unit (e.g. Department, Division, School)
More informationUniversity of Toronto
University of Toronto OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT AND PROVOST Framework for the Divisional Appeals Processes The purpose of the Framework is to provide guidance and advice for the establishment of appropriate
More informationAcademic Affairs Policy #1
Academic Institutes and Centers Date of Current Revision: September 23, 2009 Responsible Office: Vice Provost, Research and Public Service Academic Affairs Policy #1 1. PURPOSE This policy provides guidelines
More informationDepartment of Geography Bachelor of Arts in Geography Plan for Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes The University of New Mexico
Department of Geography Bachelor of Arts in Geography Plan for Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes The University of New Mexico A. College, Department and Date 1. College: College of Arts & Sciences
More informationDeveloping an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning
Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning By Peggy L. Maki, Senior Scholar, Assessing for Learning American Association for Higher Education (pre-publication version of article that
More informationState Parental Involvement Plan
A Toolkit for Title I Parental Involvement Section 3 Tools Page 41 Tool 3.1: State Parental Involvement Plan Description This tool serves as an example of one SEA s plan for supporting LEAs and schools
More informationKelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)
Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association 2015-2017 Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP) Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association 2015-2017 Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP) TABLE
More informationIUPUI Office of Student Conduct Disciplinary Procedures for Alleged Violations of Personal Misconduct
IUPUI Office of Student Conduct Disciplinary Procedures for Alleged Violations of Personal Misconduct Preamble IUPUI disciplinary procedures determine responsibility and appropriate consequences for violations
More informationPROGRAM REVIEW REPORT EXTERNAL REVIEWER
PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT EXTERNAL REVIEWER MASTER OF PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SACRAMENTO NOVEMBER, 2012 Submitted by Michelle
More informationCollege of Science Promotion & Tenure Guidelines For Use with MU-BOG AA-26 and AA-28 (April 2014) Revised 8 September 2017
College of Science Promotion & Tenure Guidelines For Use with MU-BOG AA-26 and AA-28 (April 2014) Revised 8 September 2017 Introduction Marshall University Board of Governors (BOG) policies define the
More informationPromotion and Tenure standards for the Digital Art & Design Program 1 (DAAD) 2
Promotion and Tenure standards for the Digital Art & Design Program 1 (DAAD) 2 I. Preamble The Digital Art & Design [DAAD] Department is committed to personal and professional growth of its members through
More informationCOLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING CLINICAL FACULTY POLICY AND PROCEDURES
1 COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING CLINICAL FACULTY POLICY AND PROCEDURES Definition of Clinical Faculty A Clinical Faculty member in the Department of Marketing (Marketing) is
More informationPATTERNS OF ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL EDUCATION & ANATOMY THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
PATTERNS OF ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL EDUCATION & ANATOMY THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY OAA Approved 8/25/2016 PATTERNS OF ADMINISTRAION Department of Biomedical Education & Anatomy INTRODUCTION
More informationAnthropology Graduate Student Handbook (revised 5/15)
Anthropology Graduate Student Handbook (revised 5/15) 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 3 ADMISSIONS... 3 APPLICATION MATERIALS... 4 DELAYED ENROLLMENT... 4 PROGRAM OVERVIEW... 4 TRACK 1: MA STUDENTS...
More informationeportfolio Guide Missouri State University
Social Studies eportfolio Guide Missouri State University Updated February 2014 Missouri State Portfolio Guide MoSPE & Conceptual Framework Standards QUALITY INDICATORS MoSPE 1: Content Knowledge Aligned
More informationCollege of Liberal Arts (CLA)
College of Liberal Arts (CLA) 1 College of Liberal Arts (CLA) Courses CLA 1001. The CLA First Year Experience. 1 Credit Hour. The CLA First Year Experience introduces students to the rich diversity of
More informationStandards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS
Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS World Headquarters 11520 West 119th Street Overland Park, KS 66213 USA USA Belgium Perú acbsp.org info@acbsp.org
More informationAugusta University MPA Program Diversity and Cultural Competency Plan. Section One: Description of the Plan
Augusta University MPA Program Diversity and Cultural Competency Plan Section One: Description of the Plan Over the past 20 years, the United States has gone through tremendous changes. Those changes include
More informationPHL Grad Handbook Department of Philosophy Michigan State University Graduate Student Handbook
PHL Grad Handbook 12 1 Department of Philosophy Michigan State University http://www.msu.edu/unit/phl/ Graduate Student Handbook PHL Grad Handbook 12 2 Table of Contents I. Department Overview II. The
More informationArticle 15 TENURE. A. Definition
Article 15 TENURE A. Definition Tenure shall mean the right of a FACULTY MEMBER to hold his/her position and not to be removed therefrom except for just cause as hereinafter set forth in this Article or
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT Saint Paul Public Schools Independent School District # 625 360 Colborne Street Saint Paul MN 55102-3299 RFP Superintendent Search Consultant, St.
More informationInstructions and Guidelines for Promotion and Tenure Review of IUB Librarians
Instructions and Guidelines for Promotion and Tenure Review of IUB Librarians Approved by the IUB Library Faculty June 2012. Future amendment by vote of Bloomington Library Faculty Council. Amended August
More informationAssessment of Student Academic Achievement
Assessment of Student Academic Achievement 13 Chapter Parkland s commitment to the assessment of student academic achievement and its documentation is reflected in the college s mission statement; it also
More informationDepartment of Anatomy Bylaws
Department of Anatomy Bylaws Approved: June 9, 2003 Section I. Introduction These Bylaws: 1. provide for faculty participation in the Department, in accordance with the collective bargaining agreement
More informationSECTION 1: SOLES General Information FACULTY & PERSONNEL HANDBOOK
School Education of Leadership Sciences and Education Sciences 2013-2014 2014-2015 FACULTY & PERSONNEL HANDBOOK School of Leadership and SECTION 1: SOLES General Information University Graduate Academic
More informationOklahoma State University Policy and Procedures
Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE PROCESS FOR RANKED FACULTY 2-0902 ACADEMIC AFFAIRS September 2015 PURPOSE The purpose of this policy and procedures letter
More informationHiring Procedures for Faculty. Table of Contents
Hiring Procedures for Faculty Table of Contents SECTION I: PROCEDURES FOR NEW FULL-TIME FACULTY APPOINTMENTS... 2 A. Search Committee... 2 B. Applicant Clearinghouse Form and Applicant Data Sheet... 2
More information(2) "Half time basis" means teaching fifteen (15) hours per week in the intern s area of certification.
16 KAR 7:010. Kentucky Teacher Internship Program. RELATES TO: KRS 156.101, 161.028, 161.030, 161.048, 161.095 STATUTORY AUTHORITY: KRS 161.028(1)(a), 161.030 NECESSITY, FUNCTION, AND CONFORMITY: KRS 161.030(5)
More informationDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure and Cumulative Post-Tenure Review Policies and Procedures TABLE OF CONTENTS Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure 1. Role of Plant
More informationThe College of Law Mission Statement
The College of Law Mission Statement The mission of the College of Law is to create an intellectual environment that prepares students in the legal practice of their choice, enhances the College s regional
More informationAcademic Freedom Intellectual Property Academic Integrity
Academic Policies The purpose of Gwinnett Tech s academic policies is to ensure fairness and consistency in the manner in which academic performance is administered, evaluated and communicated to students.
More informationGRADUATE PROGRAM IN ENGLISH
brfhtrhr GRADUATE PROGRAM IN ENGLISH 1. General Information 2. Program Outline 3. Advising 4. Coursework 5. Evaluation Procedures 6. Grading & Academic Standing 7. Research & Teaching Assistantships 8.
More informationAcademic Teaching Staff (ATS) Agreement Implementation Information Document May 25, 2017
Preamble Academic Teaching Staff (ATS) Agreement Implementation Information Document May 25, 2017 The Academic Teaching Staff (ATS) Agreement was approved by the Board of Governors on May 12, 2017 following
More informationGRADUATE PROGRAM Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Drexel University Graduate Advisor: Prof. Caroline Schauer, Ph.D.
GRADUATE PROGRAM Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Drexel University Graduate Advisor: Prof. Caroline Schauer, Ph.D. 05/15/2012 The policies listed herein are applicable to all students
More informationTITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL PART 25 CERTIFICATION
ISBE 23 ILLINOIS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 25 TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES : EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION : PERSONNEL Section 25.10 Accredited Institution PART 25 CERTIFICATION
More informationCurricular Reviews: Harvard, Yale & Princeton. DUE Meeting
Curricular Reviews: Harvard, Yale & Princeton DUE Meeting 3 March 2006 1 Some Numbers for Comparison Undergraduates MIT: 4,066 1,745 engineering majors (plus 169 Course 6 MEng) 876 science majors 128 humanities,
More informationFocus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION
Focus on Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL ACCREDITING COMMISSION FOR SCHOOLS, WESTERN ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES www.acswasc.org 10/10/12 2013 WASC EDITION Focus on Learning THE ACCREDITATION
More informationProgram Change Proposal:
Program Change Proposal: Provided to Faculty in the following affected units: Department of Management Department of Marketing School of Allied Health 1 Department of Kinesiology 2 Department of Animal
More informationSTUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT
STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT PROGRAM: Sociology SUBMITTED BY: Janine DeWitt DATE: August 2016 BRIEFLY DESCRIBE WHERE AND HOW ARE DATA AND DOCUMENTS USED TO GENERATE THIS REPORT BEING STORED: The
More informationDOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE
Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science 1 DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE Work leading to the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) is designed to give the candidate a thorough and comprehensive
More informationStudent Learning Outcomes: A new model of assessment
Student Learning Outcomes: A new model of assessment Proposed Spring 2012 by members of the Teaching and Learning Project: Tawny Beal, Scott Cabral, Christina Goff, Mike Grillo, Kiran Kamath, Cindy McGrath,
More informationADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY
ADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY William Carter, Director of Admission College Hall 140. MSC 128. Extension 2315. Texas A&M University-Kingsville adheres to high standards of academic excellence and admits
More informationThe Ohio State University. Colleges of the Arts and Sciences. Bachelor of Science Degree Requirements. The Aim of the Arts and Sciences
The Ohio State University Colleges of the Arts and Sciences Bachelor of Science Degree Requirements Spring Quarter 2004 (May 4, 2004) The Aim of the Arts and Sciences Five colleges comprise the Colleges
More informationGraduate Student Grievance Procedures
Graduate Student Grievance Procedures The following policy and procedures regarding non-grade grievances by graduate students can be adopted or adapted in whole or in part by programs/schools/departments
More informationNSU Oceanographic Center Directions for the Thesis Track Student
NSU Oceanographic Center Directions for the Thesis Track Student This publication is designed to help students through the various stages of their Ph.D. degree. For full requirements, please consult the
More informationUniversity of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Programmatic Evaluation Plan
University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2015 Programmatic Evaluation Plan The purpose of this document is to establish and describe the programmatic evaluation plan
More informationBachelor of International Hospitality Management, BA IHM. Course curriculum National and Institutional Part
Bachelor of International Hospitality Management, BA IHM Course curriculum 2016-2018 August 2016 0 INDHOLD 1. curriculum framework... 4 1.1. Objective of the study programme... 4 1.2. Title and duration...
More informationCERTIFIED TEACHER LICENSURE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
CERTIFIED TEACHER LICENSURE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2016-2017 DODGE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS USD 443 DODGE CITY, KANSAS LOCAL PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDE Table of Contents 1. General Information -
More informationDOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY HANDBOOK
University of Virginia Department of Systems and Information Engineering DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY HANDBOOK 1. Program Description 2. Degree Requirements 3. Advisory Committee 4. Plan of Study 5. Comprehensive
More informationFaculty Voice Task Force 5: Fixed Term Faculty. November 1, 2006
Faculty Voice Task Force 5: Fixed Term Faculty November 1, 2006 [This version was reviewed by the Voice Integration Committee at its meeting on October 31, 2006, for presentation to ECAC on November 7,
More information