Summary of Yield Ratios by Geographic and Demographic Characteristics

Transcription

1 Summary of Yield Ratios by Geographic and Demographic Characteristics CSU East Bay Office of Planning and Institutional Research March 11, 2013 Contents 1 Summary of Applicants, Admits, and Enrolled First-Time Freshmen Total Applicants, Admits, and Enrolled First-Time Freshmen Distribution by Demographics Funnel Statistics by Race/Ethnicity Final Admission Status and Yield by Academic Preparedness Final Admission Status by High School GPA Final Admission Status by SAT Score (1600) High School GPA and SAT Score by CA Residency and Final Admission Status Yield by High School GPA and SAT Score Final Admission Status by Region Geographic Density Applied-Not-Admitted Students Geographic Density of Admitted-Not-Enrolled Students Geographic Density of Enrolled Students Geographic Density of Students by Originating High School - All Final Admission Statuses High Schools Top 45 High Schools by Final Admission Status High Schools by Final Admission Status, Average and SAT Score, and Yield Rates Top High Schools for STEM, Non-STEM Enrolling Students Yield by Major Interest, STEM and Non-STEM

2 Executive Summary African American and Pacific Islander students are admitted at lower rates and enroll at higher rates, with the opposite being true for American Indian and White students (Figure 3) Enrolled students are most strongly represented just above the Admissions Index requirements for High School GPA and SAT score (Figures 6 & 7) Students with higher High School GPAs yield at lower rates, with the difference being larger with regards to SAT scores (Table 4, Figures 9 & 10) Geographic regions with relatively high density of Admitted-Not-Enrolled students and low density of Enrolled students include Dublin/Pleasanton, San Jose, and San Francisco (Figures 13 & 14) Introduction This research has been conducted in order to provide contextual information and analysis useful for evaluating and improving the effectiveness of First-Time Freshmen recruitment efforts. The focus of this report is on yield rates by originating high school, geographic region, student demographics, and academic preparedness. As a result of understanding the degree of recruitment effectiveness in the context of these variables, more informed choices can be made about directing resources to most effectively yield the best students at the highest rates. Also, this summary is intended to be useful for identifying additional questions for further study. Please note, Final Admission Status in this report refers to the most advanced admissions stage a potential student reaches in the admissions process. The stages are mutually exclusive. For example, a student who applies, is admitted, but does not enroll would be counted only among the Admits. This allows for an unduplicated headcount when looking at the entire pool, and provides information about rate-of-flow through the admissions funnel. 1 Summary of Applicants, Admits, and Enrolled First-Time Freshmen 1.1 Total Applicants, Admits, and Enrolled First-Time Freshmen Applicants, Admits, and Enrolled students for Fall 2009 and Fall 2012 are the focus of this summary. These are the two most recent quarters representing typical Fall term admission processing practices and enrollment patterns with few Chancellor s Office enrollment management constraints. In 2010 and 2011 different data management practices were employed to define an admitted student, and therefore these data cannot be combined with those from other years, as Table 1 illustrates. Fall 2009 Fall 2010* Fall 2011* Fall 2012 Total Applicants 8, % 10, % 11, % 13, % Total Admits 5, % 3, % 2, % 8, % Total Enrolled 1, % 1, % 1, % 1, % (Not mutually-exclusive categories) Table 1: Admissions Counts, Applicant/Admitted Yield Ratios, and Admitted/Enrolled Yield Ratios 1.2 Distribution by Demographics Falls 2009 and 2012 each saw large First-Time Freshmen classes (1,437 and 1,570). The proportions of Enrolled students has shifted somewhat across racial/ethnic categories, most notably with increases in Hispanic and African American students in Headcounts by Gender and Race/Ethnicity appear in Table 2. The same data are displayed graphically in Figure 2 as yield ratios Applicant-Admitted and Admitted-Enrolled. Figure 1 illustrates how the shape of the funnel is defined by the ratio of Applicants who are Admitted, and the ratio of Admitted students who Enrolled. 2

3 Applicants Admitted Enrolled F09 F12 Tot F09 F12 Tot F09 F12 Tot Female 5,494 8,014 13,508 3,499 5,198 8, % % 1, % Male 3,293 5,021 8,314 2,090 2,967 5, % % 1, % Am Ind % 6.4% 11.4% Asian 1,878 2,259 4,137 1,334 1,690 3, % % % Black 1,279 1,861 3, , % % % Hisp 2,352 4,743 7,095 1,474 2,981 4, % % % Pac Isl % % % Two , % % % White 1,521 1,692 3,213 1,079 1,282 2, % % % Int l 692 1,225 1, % % % Unknown % % % Total 8,789 13,048 21,837 5,589 8,171 13,760 1, % 1, % 3, % (Not mutually-exclusive categories) Table 2: Students by Admission Stage - Gender and Race/Ethnicity - Fall 2009, Fall 2012 Table 2 shows: The proportion of Male to Female students has remained about the same Racial/Ethnic group proportions have shifted, with greater numbers of Hispanic/Latino (+10.5%) and Black students (+2.6%), and fewer Asian (-2.9%) and White (-1.8%) students 3

4 1.3 Funnel Statistics by Race/Ethnicity Nbr Applicants Adm/App Yield Rate Nbr Admitted Nbr Enrolled Enr/Adm Yield Rate Figure 1: Key to Funnel Graphics Stanford UC Berkeley San Jose State San Francisco State CSU East Bay 7.1% 21.4% 56.6% 61.5% 62.6% 34,348 50,374 22,999 29,935 13,047 2,437 10,795 13,011 18,401 8,171 1,707 4,109 2,761 3,659 1,570 70% 38% 21% 20% 19% Figure 2: Fall 2011 First-Time Degree-Seeking Undergraduate Admissions Statistics [Sources: IPEDS Data Center, Pioneer Data Warehouse *F12 Admissions Data for CSUEB] As Figure 2 illustrates, greater selectivity is defined by a proportionately small Applicant to Admit Yield, and a proportionately large Admit to Enroll Yield. The overall shape representing high selectivity has a wide mouth, narrow waist, and straight stem. The converse is true for lower selectivity. 4

5 AmInd Unknown White Hisp Asian % 20% 73% 12% % 47% 73% 12% 1,524 1, ,692 1, % 19% 76% 15% 2,352 1, ,743 2, % 22% 63% 17% 1,878 1, ,259 1, % 24% 75% 18% Fall 2009 Fall 2012 Admit Enroll Yield 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% Two+ PacIsl Black Intl Total % 27% 68% 20% % 33% 64% 26% 1, , % 31% 53% 27% , % 37% 29% 29% 8,789 5,589 1,437 13,048 8,171 1,570 64% 25% 63% 19% Fall 2009 Fall 2012 Admit Enroll Yield 35% 30% 25% 20% Figure 3: First-Time Freshman Yield Statistics by Race/Ethnicity - Fall 2009 and Fall 2012 (Shaded by Admitted- Enrolled Yield) Looking at Figure 3, it can be observed: American Indian and White students are admitted at higher rates and enroll at lower rates Pacific Islander and Black students are admitted at lower rates, and enroll at higher rates NOTE: It is common for International students to apply multiple times in their efforts to enroll at CSUEB, which accounts for the unusually selective funnel profile 5

6 2 Final Admission Status and Yield by Academic Preparedness 2.1 Final Admission Status by High School GPA The density of students by high school GPA was plotted to examine the distributions of students based on their final admission status - Applicant, Admitted, or Enrolled. Fall 2009 and Fall 2012 have very similar profiles for each student type, but group sizes differ. Group statistics appear in Table 3. Admitted-Not-Enrolled students, on average, had higher GPAs than Enrolled students. Applied-Not-Admitted student appear to include two distinct groups: 1. under-prepared students (the majority) 2. very well-prepared students Better-prepared students were admitted in Fall 2012 versus Fall 2009, as evidenced by higher mean High School GPAs among Admitted students (t = 7.13***, df = 10,296) Enrolled Students in Fall 2009 and Fall 2012 were comparable on High School GPA and SAT. Applicant Admitted Enrolled Valid N Mean SD Valid N Mean SD Valid N Mean SD Fall 2009 High School GPA 2, , , Total SAT (1600) 2, , , Fall 2012 High School GPA 4, , , Total SAT (1600) 3, , , Table 3: High School GPA and SAT Score by Final Admission Status Count Fall 2009 Fall 2012 Final Admissions Status App Adm Enr High School GPA Figure 4: Stacked Histogram of High School GPA by Final Admission Status (bin size =.05) 6

7 2.2 Final Admission Status by SAT Score (1600) Average SAT score for Applicants-Not-Admitted is lower than Admitted-Not-Enrolled and Enrolled students Average SAT score for Admitted-Not-Enrolled is higher than Enrolled students Among Enrolled students, there was no difference in average SAT score (t =.09, df = 2,694) from Fall 2009 to Fall Count Fall 2009 Fall 2012 SAT Score App Adm Enr SAT Total Score (1600) Figure 5: Stacked Histogram of SAT Score (1600) by Final Admission Status (bin size = 10) 7

8 2.3 High School GPA 1 and SAT Score by CA Residency and Final Admission Status High School GPA and SAT Score do not show signs of a strong correlation (r =.376, n = 10,483, p =.000); Despite being statistically significant, only 14% of the variation in SAT Scores can be explained by High School GPA (R 2 =.137) Including all Final Admission Statuses for Fall 2012, the 95% confidence interval for predicting a student s SAT score based on a High School GPA of 3.5 spans 615 points to 1,283 (See Figure 8) The Office of Planning and Institutional Research has found evidence that High School GPA is a better indicator of student retention and success than SAT score 2, which makes High School GPA a preferred indicator App Adm Enr 4 Non Res Non Res Non Res HighSchoolGPA Non Res Min Res Min Non Res Min Resident CSU Admissions Index Non Res Resident Non Res Min Res Min Non Res Min Resident CSU Admissions Index Non Res Resident Non Res Min Res Min Non Res Min Resident CSU Admissions Index Non Res Resident Fall 2009 Fall 2012 CA Residency Status CA Res Non Res 2 Res Min Res Min Res Min CSU Admissions Index CSU Admissions Index CSU Admissions Index SAT1600Score Figure 6: High School GPA by SAT Score by Final Admission Status 1 Lines in Figure 6 reflect CSU Eligibility Index for CA Residents and Non-Residents 2 June 13, 2012 Ad Hoc Report: Summary of Retention by Admission Type and Remediation Status for First-time Freshmen, 2007 to 2011 Fall Cohorts. Copies available from the CSUEB Office of Planning and Institutional Research upon request. 8

9 Figure 7 shows the same data as Figure 6 all in the same space. Density for Enrolled students is indicated by concentric shapes, with the inner-most circle representing the highest density and progressively decreasing density out to the perimeter. The most dense area for Enrolled students is near the Admissions Index limit for High School GPA and SAT scores. Density Overlay for Enrolled Students Only (Inner Circle = Most Dense) 4 HighSchoolGPA Non Res Final Admissions Status Resident 3 App Adm Enr Non Res Min Res Min 2 CSU Admissions Index SAT1600Score Figure 7: High School GPA by SAT Score by Final Admission Status - Fall 2009 and Fall 2012, All Final Admissions Statuses 9

10 A linear regression model was fitted to the relationship between High School GPA and SAT score for Fall 2012 First-Time Freshmen (Figure 8). The wide 95% confidence interval for predicting a single SAT score based on a student s High School GPA shows that the relationship is not strong. 4 HighSchoolGPA 3 2 n = 10, SAT1600Score Figure 8: Fall 2012 First-Time Freshmen High School GPA and SAT Score With Predicted SAT Score (Blue Line) & 95% Confidence Interval (Red Lines) at Each Level of High School GPA 10

11 2.4 Yield by High School GPA and SAT Score A moderate but observable decline in Admitted-Enrolled Yield can be observed as High School GPA and SAT score increase Admitted-Enrolled Yield drops below 20% for High School GPAs around 3.25, and for SAT scores around 980 High School GPA Composite SAT Percentile Range Cut Value Count App-Adm Adm-Enr Cut Value Count App-Adm Adm-Enr 0% - 4.9% > % 75.00% > % 28.93% 5% - 9.9% > % 32.06% > % 28.03% 10% % > % 21.92% > % 25.49% 15% % > % 25.00% > % 25.00% 20% % > % 23.29% > % 28.63% 25% % > % 26.68% > % 28.11% 30% % > % 22.12% > % 24.64% 35% % > % 28.10% > % 25.44% 40% % > % 22.97% > % 24.05% 45% % > % 25.49% > % 23.00% 50% % > % 20.96% > % 21.22% 55% % > % 22.65% > % 22.43% 60% % > % 24.69% > % 23.17% 65% % > % 19.34% > % 18.86% 70% % > % 23.23% > % 18.83% 75% % > % 18.72% > % 20.80% 80% % > % 18.50% > % 15.69% 85% % > % 21.52% > % 16.35% 90% % > % 17.25% > % 13.22% 95% - 100% > % 12.93% > % 10.49% Valid N = 19,831 Valid N = 18,308 Table 4: Yield Rate by High School GPA and SAT Score - Fall 2009 & Fall

12 80% 60% Yield Rate 40% Yield Type Admits/ Applicants Enrolled/ Admits 20% 0% 0% >0 5% > % >2.4 15% > % >2.6 25% > % > % 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% >2.83 >2.9 >2.96 >3.03 >3.1 >3.17 High School GPA Percentile 65% > % > % > % >3.5 85% > % > % >3.94 Figure 9: Yield Rate by High School GPA Percentile - Fall 2009 & Fall % 60% Yield Rate 40% Yield Type Admits/ Applicants Enrolled/ Admits 20% 0% 0% >400 5% >660 10% >720 15% >760 20% >780 25% >810 30% >830 35% >860 40% >880 45% >900 50% >920 55% >940 SAT Percentile 60% >960 65% >990 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% >1010 >1040 >1070 >1110 >1160 >1230 Figure 10: Yield Rate by SAT Percentile - Fall 2009 & Fall

13 3 Final Admission Status by Region 3 The highest yielding regions (Applicant/Admit) are: Applicant/Admit Yield 1. South Orange County 76.8% 2. Whittier and North Orange County 72.1% 3. Alameda County, Excl Oakland 71.8% 4. S San Diego County, Excl San Diego 71.3% 5. San Fernando Valley, West 70.8% Admit/Enroll Yield 1. Alameda County, Excl Oakland 34.1% 2. City of Oakland 28.9% 3. Out of State 27.3% 4. Contra Costa County 25.8% 5. South Bay 24.1% App/ Adm/ Adm Enr EPS Market Code App Adm Enr Yield Yield (CA01) Far Northern CA % 12.5% (CA02) Valley of the Moon % 16.3% (CA03) Sacramento Cnty % 14.4% (CA04) Marin Cnty % 10.6% (CA05) San Francisco Cnty % 15.2% (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty % 25.8% (CA07) City of Oakland % 28.9% (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 34.1% (CA09) San Mateo Cnty % 20.9% (CA10) City of San Jose % 14.7% (CA11) Santa Clara Cnty excl San Jose % 12.8% (CA12) Central Coast % 15.1% (CA13) Santa Barbara and W Ventura Cnty % 12.2% (CA14) San Fernando Valley (West) % 9.3% (CA15) San Fernando Valley (East) % 6.1% (CA16) Glendale and Pasadena % 11.5% (CA17) West LA and West Beach % 13.1% (CA18) Hollywood and Wilshire % 19.5% (CA19) East LA % 13.0% (CA20) South Bay % 24.1% (CA21) South and South Central LA % 14.6% (CA22) Long Beach % 17.6% (CA23) Covina and West Covina % 13.3% (CA24) Whittier and N Orange Cnty % 11.8% (CA25) Anaheim % 20.0% (CA26) Santa Ana % 13.8% (CA27) Riverside, San Bernardino, Ontario % 15.7% (CA28) S Orange Cnty % 12.3% (CA29) N San Diego Cnty excl SD % 17.0% (CA30) S San Diego Cnty excl SD % 13.8% (CA31) City of San Diego % 10.3% (CA32) Central Valley - North % 20.1% (CA33) Central Valley - South % 16.9% (CA34) Greater Imperial Valley % 11.3% Out of State % 27.3% Table 5: Yield Rates by EPS Market Region, F09 + F12 3 Disaggregated data provided to Admissions as a separate file. 13

14 (CA01) Far Northern CA (CA02) Valley of the Moon (CA03) Sacramento Cnty (CA04) Marin Cnty (CA05) San Francisco Cnty (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty (CA07) City of Oakland (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland (CA09) San Mateo Cnty (CA10) City of San Jose (CA11) Santa Clara Cnty excl San Jose (CA12) Central Coast (CA13) Santa Barbara and W Ventura Cnty (CA14) San Fernando Valley (West) (CA15) San Fernando Valley (East) (CA16) Glendale and Pasadena (CA17) West LA and West Beach (CA18) Hollywood and Wilshire (CA19) East LA AppAdmYield AdmEnrYield (CA20) South Bay (CA21) South and South Central LA (CA22) Long Beach (CA23) Covina and West Covina (CA24) Whittier and N Orange Cnty (CA25) Anaheim (CA26) Santa Ana (CA27) Riverside, San Bernardino, Ontario (CA28) S Orange Cnty (CA29) N San Diego Cnty excl SD (CA30) S San Diego Cnty excl SD (CA31) City of San Diego (CA32) Central Valley North (CA33) Central Valley South (CA34) Greater Imperial Valley Out of State 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Yield Rate Figure 11: Applicants, Admitted, and Enrolled Students by EPS Market Region (F09 + F12 Combined) 14

15 3.1 Geographic Density Applied-Not-Admitted Students Innermost Shape = Highest Density Figure 12: Geographic Density Applied-Not-Admitted Students by High School Location - F09 & F12 15

16 3.2 Geographic Density of Admitted-Not-Enrolled Students Innermost Shape = Highest Density Figure 13: Geographic Density of Admitted-Not-Enrolled Students by High School Location - F09 & F12 16

17 3.3 Geographic Density of Enrolled Students Innermost Shape = Highest Density Figure 14: Geographic Density of Enrolled Students by High School Location - F09 & F12 17

18 3.4 Geographic Density of Students by Originating High School - All Final Admission Statuses Figure 15: Geographic Density of Students by High School Location - All Final Admission Statuses - F09 & F12 18

19 4 High Schools 4.1 Top 45 High Schools by Final Admission Status Enrolled Admitted Applicant Rank High School Count High School Count High School Count 1 James Logan High 114 James Logan High 282 James Logan High Tennyson High 78 Castro Valley High 191 San Leandro High Castro Valley High 70 San Leandro High 189 Castro Valley High Arroyo High 64 Arroyo High 161 Oakland Senior High San Leandro High 62 Mt. Eden High 151 Mt. Eden High Mt. Eden High 60 Moreau Catholic High 136 Arroyo High Newark Memorial High 54 American High 134 American High Hayward High 50 Newark Memorial High 129 Berkeley High Oakland Senior High 43 Tennyson High 127 Tennyson High American High 42 Oakland Senior High 122 Moreau Catholic High San Lorenzo High 40 Berkeley High 102 Newark Memorial High Moreau Catholic High 37 Irvington High 100 San Lorenzo High Leadership P.S. - Hayward 29 San Lorenzo High 98 Hayward High Washington High 27 Mission San Jose High 93 Oakland Tech Senior High Skyline Senior High 27 John F. Kennedy High 92 Skyline Senior High Irvington High 26 Hayward High 92 Irvington High John F. Kennedy High 25 Independence High 87 Mission San Jose High Merrill F. West High 23 Alameda High 81 John F. Kennedy High Pittsburg Senior High 21 Dublin High 78 Alameda High Dublin High 21 Washington High 77 Independence High Oakland Tech Senior High 20 California High 76 Washington High Deer Valley High 19 Oakland Tech Senior High 74 Dublin High California High 19 Skyline Senior High 69 Milpitas High Berkeley High 19 Merrill F. West High 69 Senior Middle School St. Joseph Notre Dame High 18 Amador Valley High 68 California High Concord High 18 Granada High 67 Merrill F. West High Livermore High 16 Milpitas High 65 Deer Valley High Independence High 16 Pittsburg Senior High 63 Luther Burbank High Senior Middle School 14 Deer Valley High 62 Amador Valley High Alameda High 14 Foothill High 60 Granada High Antioch High 14 Luther Burbank High 58 Pittsburg Senior High Clayton Valley High 14 Bishop O Dowd HS 56 Foothill High Oakland Mil Inst CP Acad 14 Pinole Valley High 53 Bishop O Dowd HS Mt. Pleasant High 14 Aspire L.W. CP Acad 53 Abraham Lincoln High Monte Vista High 13 St. Joseph Notre Dame High 49 Pinole Valley High Dozier-Libbey Medical High 13 Monte Vista High 47 Mission High Hercules High 13 Sacred Heart Cathedral Prep 46 Encinal High Granada High 13 Leadership P.S. - Hayward 46 Aspire L. W. CP Acad Amador Valley High 13 Salesian High 45 Richmond High Bishop O Dowd High School 13 Abraham Lincoln High 44 King/Drew Medical HS Milpitas High 13 Tracy High 44 George Washington High Mission San Jose High 12 Grant Union High 43 El Cerrito Senior High Weston Ranch High 12 Richmond High 42 Leadership P.S. - Hayward Tracy High 12 Clayton Valley High 41 Sacred Heart Cathedral Prep Aragon High 11 Concord High 41 Downtown College Prep 64 Table 6: Top 45 High Schools For Each Final Admission Status 19

20 4.2 High Schools by Final Admission Status, Average and SAT Score, and Yield Rates See Supplemental File for Detailed List 20

21 4.3 Top High Schools for STEM, Non-STEM Enrolling Students App- Adm- App- Adm Enr Enr High School EPS Region App Adm Enr Yield Yield Yield James Logan High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 40% 29% Tennyson High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 61% 45% Castro Valley High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 37% 29% Arroyo High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 40% 33% San Leandro High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 33% 23% Mt. Eden High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 40% 31% Newark Memorial High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 42% 32% Hayward High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 54% 36% Oakland Senior High (CA07) City of Oakland % 35% 21% American High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 31% 22% San Lorenzo High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 41% 26% Moreau Catholic High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 27% 21% Leadership Pub Sch-Hayward (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 63% 45% Irvington High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 27% 22% Washington High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 35% 25% Skyline Senior High (CA07) City of Oakland % 39% 20% John F. Kennedy High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 27% 20% Merrill F. West High (CA32) Central Valley - North % 33% 24% Pittsburg Senior High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty % 33% 24% Dublin High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 27% 20% Oakland Tech Senior High (CA07) City of Oakland % 27% 15% Deer Valley High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty % 31% 20% California High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty % 25% 20% Berkeley High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 19% 10% St. Joseph Notre Dame High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 37% 30% Concord High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty % 44% 32% Livermore High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 48% 36% Independence High (CA10) City of San Jose % 18% 14% Senior Middle School (NA) Out of State % 82% 14% Alameda High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 17% 12% Antioch High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty % 35% 25% Clayton Valley High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty % 34% 26% Oakland Mil Inst CP Acad (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 41% 30% Mt. Pleasant High (CA10) City of San Jose % 34% 22% Monte Vista High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty % 28% 22% Dozier-Libbey Medical High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty % 43% 36% Hercules High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty % 33% 22% Granada High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 19% 15% Amador Valley High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 19% 14% Bishop O Dowd High School (CA07) City of Oakland % 23% 16% Milpitas High (CA11) Santa Clara Cnty excl San Jose % 20% 13% Mission San Jose High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 13% 10% Weston Ranch High (CA32) Central Valley - North % 38% 24% Tracy High (CA32) Central Valley - North % 27% 19% Aragon High (CA09) San Mateo Cnty % 32% 28% Table 7: Top Non-STEM-Enrolling High Schools - F09 & F12 21

22 App- Adm- App- Adm Enr Enr High School Region Code App Adm Enr Yield Yield Yield Tennyson High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 55% 47% James Logan High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 29% 22% Mt. Eden High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 38% 29% Newark Memorial High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 41% 33% Castro Valley High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 39% 31% San Leandro High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 38% 24% Leadership Pub Sch - Hayward (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 81% 59% Arroyo High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 29% 22% John F. Kennedy High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 25% 21% San Lorenzo High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 35% 23% Hayward High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 50% 35% Oakland Senior High (CA07) City of Oakland % 36% 21% Moreau Catholic High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 21% 16% American High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 14% 10% Washington High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 25% 19% Independence High (CA10) City of San Jose % 21% 14% Irvington High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 24% 18% FAME Public Charter School (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 63% 42% Dublin High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 29% 21% Bishop O Dowd High School (CA07) City of Oakland % 45% 36% New Millennium Secondary (CA22) Long Beach % 67% 57% Deer Valley High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty % 27% 17% Dozier-Libbey Medical High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty % 44% 36% Impact Acad of Arts & Tech (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 29% 24% Pittsburg Senior High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty % 40% 27% California High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty % 31% 25% Aspire L.W. CP Academy (CA07) City of Oakland % 24% 17% Berkeley High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 25% 13% Mt. Pleasant High (CA10) City of San Jose % 33% 25% Senior Middle School (NA) Out of State % 100% 19% Marc & Eva Stern Math & Sci (CA19) East LA % 30% 27% University Preparatory (CA27) Riverside, San Bern., Ontario % 60% 50% Lemoore High (CA33) Central Valley - South % 75% 60% East Palo Alto High School (CA09) San Mateo Cnty % 50% 21% Menlo-Atherton High (CA09) San Mateo Cnty % 33% 20% El Camino High (CA09) San Mateo Cnty % 23% 20% Hillsdale High (CA09) San Mateo Cnty % 43% 30% Alameda High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 14% 10% Monte Vista High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty % 27% 25% Livermore High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 30% 25% Granada High (CA08) Alameda Cnty excl Oakland % 19% 14% Freedom High (CA06) Contra Costa Cnty % 23% 18% Jesse M. Bethel High (CA02) Valley of the Moon % 27% 20% Oakland Unified (CA07) City of Oakland % 75% 50% Oakland Tech Senior High (CA07) City of Oakland % 20% 12% Table 8: Top STEM-Enrolling High Schools - F09 & F12 22

23 4.4 Yield by Major Interest, STEM and Non-STEM App- Adm- Adm Enr Major Applicants Admits Enrolled Yield Yield Non-STEM Anthropology BA % 19.7% Art BA % 22.5% Business Admin BS % 28.5% Communication BA % 23.1% Construction Management BS % 25.0% Criminal Justice Admin BS % 23.9% Economics BA % 21.6% English BA % 15.3% Environmental Studies BA % 18.4% Ethnic Studies BA % 21.9% French BA % 16.7% Geography BA % 20.0% Geography BS % 0.0% History BA % 18.0% Hospitality and Tourism BS % 12.8% Human Development BA % 19.9% Interdisciplinary Studies BA % 0.0% Interdisciplinary Studies BS % 0.0% International Studies BA % 15.7% Kinesiology BS % 23.4% Latin American Studies BA % 0.0% Liberal Studies BA % 20.1% Music BA % 21.0% Nursing BS % 0.0% Philosophy BA % 22.0% Political Science BA % 15.9% Pre-Business Admin Program % 17.8% Pre-Nursing Program % 29.7% Psychology BA % 21.6% Psychology BS % 23.6% Recreation BS % 35.7% Sociology BA % 18.5% Spanish BA % 13.2% Speech Path & Audiology BS % 25.0% Theatre Arts BA % 18.7% Undeclared % 19.0% Unknown Major % 0.0% Table 9: Yield by Non-STEM Major Interest - F09 & F12 23

24 Major Applicants Admits Enrolled App-Adm Yield Adm-Enr Yield STEM Biochemistry BA % 29.4% Biochemistry BS % 14.4% Biological Science BA % 20.0% Biological Science BS % 17.7% Chemistry BA % 33.3% Chemistry BS % 22.4% Computer Engineering BS % 50.0% Computer Science BS % 22.0% Engineering BS % 19.7% Environmental Science BS % 9.2% Geology BA % 0.0% Geology BS % 11.1% Health Sciences BS % 25.0% Industrial Engineering BS % 62.5% Mathematics BS % 20.4% Physics BA % 12.5% Physics BS % 12.9% Statistics BS % 66.7% Table 10: Yield by STEM Major Interest - F09 & F12 24