Teays Valley Local Schools

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Teays Valley Local Schools"

Jeffery Fox
5 years ago
Views:

1 Teays Valley Local Schools ATTENDANCE BOUNDARY PLANNING BOARD OF EDUCATION MEETING: DECEMBER 19, 2016

Current Boundaries Current School Capacity Enrollment Utilization Intradistrict Transfer In Intradistrict Transfer Out Static SPED Students Proposed Static Out of District Students Enrollment Empty

2 Current Boundaries Current School Capacity Enrollment Utilization Intradistrict Transfer In Intradistrict Transfer Out Static SPED Students Proposed Static Out of District Students Enrollment Empty Seats Utilization Delta Elementary Schools AES % % 0 SBES % % 0 SES % % 0 WES % % 0 Middle Schools EMS % % 0 WMS % % 0 2

3 Comprehensive Process Develop Measurable Criteria Assemble Steering Committee Develop Options Collect Community Feedback Analyze Results Develop Recommendations 3

4 Project Timeline August 15 th Board Presentation, Began Collecting Steering Committee Applications September 2 nd Steering Committee application window closed September 7 th Steering Committee membership guidelines finalized September 12 th Steering Committee Meeting #1 October 3 rd Steering Committee Meeting #2 October 17 th Steering Committee Meeting #3 November 7 th Steering Committee Meeting #4 November 14 th & 15 th Community Meetings December 5 th Steering Committee Meeting #5 December 19 th, 2017 Final Board Presentation 4

5 Develop Measurable Guidelines These are parameters that will be used to determine the effectiveness of potential boundary options. Examples include: Balance utilization among all schools while allowing for future growth or other demographic changes. Minimize student transportation and travel time. Utilize geographical boundaries (major roads, subdivisions, rivers, etc.). Attempt to assign entire neighborhoods to the same schools. Maintain diverse student populations (Socio-economics, race / ethnicity). Consideration of vertical alignment (Pathways from elementary to middle school to high school). 5

6 Develop Measurable Guidelines There is no prioritization of guidelines. Some may be in direct contradiction of others. The intent is to provide a measurable way to compare options to each other. 6

7 Assemble Steering Committee A steering committee, composed of parents and other community members, is critical to a successful process. Steering Committee Member Roles and Responsibilities: Be objective and consider the needs of ALL TVLSD students. Attend all steering committee meetings Share information with your neighbors and help get the word out about the process. What is not going to happen? A small segment of the community will stack the committee to push an agenda. 7

8 Assemble Steering Committee Steering Committee Composition parents and community members Geographically diverse Teachers and administrators may participate, but must adhere to roles and responsibilities. Steering Committee Selection Applications were submitted online Applicants from over-represented areas self selected to come to the appropriate number of members. 8

9 Steering Committee Composition Composition of the Committee should mirror the student enrollment 101 responses collected between August 16 th and September 6 th Geographical Distribution of Students (Based on Elementary Attendance Zone) Geographical Distribution of Applicants (Based on Elementary Attendance Zone) Walnut 22% Ashville 20% S. Bloomfield 13% Walnut 12% Ashville 13% S. Bloomfield 21% Scioto 37% Scioto 62% 9

10 Steering Committee Composition K-8 Grade Level Distribution Students Middle School 32% El ementary 68% Elementary Middle School 10

11 Steering Committee Composition (48 / 101 attended the first meeting) We want to have a manageable number under 40 Representation should mirror the district. At-large seats are intended for high school parents or those who do not have children in the system. Parents with students in more than one grade level may fill either slot. Consider balanced representations between neighborhoods with each Geographical Area geographical area. Elementary Parents East MS Parents West MS Parents At Large Members Total Percentage Ashville % Scioto % S. Bloomfield % Walnut % Total

12 Steering Committee Composition Steering Committee Members: Monique Brown Ronde Brushart Craig Butler Dawn Carothers Neil Cline Kendra Cook Erin Crego Anna Davis Jennifer Dennis Jennifer Driesbach Chris Fleming Nathan Frick Kelly Frizzell Julie Gill Chad Henderson Mark Hoffhines Traci Huston Stacie Jett Kristen Kachurak Jennifer Kirk Amanda Marshall John Maynard Megan McCarley Chistopher McComb Carey McFarland Kim Miller Bruce Moore Megan Reichert John Roberts Kelly Sells Kendra Sherman Aubrey Sturgell Jessica Templin Joseph Testa David Thompson Ryan Thompson Allison Wilcox 12

13 Background Information Current Enrollment by School by Grade Ashville Elementary S. Bloomfield Elementary Scioto Elementary Walnut Elementary Grade Students Grade Students Grade Students Grade Students PS 23 PS 17 PS 33 PS 13 KG 45 KG 60 KG 93 KG TOTAL 406 TOTAL 407 TOTAL 719 TOTAL 412 T.V. East Middle School Grade Students TOTAL 477 T.V. West Middle School 1 Source: Teays Valley Local Schools, September 1, 2016 Grade Students TOTAL 409 Teays Valley High School Grade Students TOTAL 1248 School Grade PS KG TOTAL Ashville ES Scioto ES S. Bloomfield ES Walnut ES East MS West MS TVHS TOTAL Teays Valley School District Grade Students PS 86 KG TOTAL

14 Background Information Live/Attend Tables Teays V alley Local Schools Elementary School (PK-5) Live/Attend Live Attend Ashville Scioto South Bloomfield Source: Teays Valley Local Schools, September 1, 2016 Walnut Live In Transfer Out % Transfer Out Ashville % Scioto % South Bloomfield % Walnut % Out of District Attend Live and Attend Transfer In % Transfer In 16% 3% 12% 9% Teays V alley Local Schools Middle School (6-8) Live/Attend Live Attend East MS West MS Live In Source: Teays Valley Local Schools, September 1, 2016 Transfer Out % Transfer O East MS % West MS % Out of District Attend Live and Attend Transfer In % Transfer In 6% 5% 14

15 Background Information Projected Enrollment & Utilization School Year School Year School Year Building Capacity Current Enrollment Utilization Projected Enrollment Enrollment Comparison to Current S.Y. Projected Utilization Projected Enrollment Enrollment Comparison to Current S.Y. Projected Utilization TVHS % % % East MS % % % West MS % % % Ashville Elementary % % % Scioto Elementary % % % S. Bloomfield Elementary % % % Walnut Elementary % % % Total % % % < 70% 70% - 79% 80% - 89% 90% - 100% > 100% 15

Background Information Planning Units School Info Current Enrollment Key ES MS PK-5 6-8 Total SES-00 Scioto West 44 32 76 SES-01 Scioto West 107 38 145 SES-02 Scioto West 4 5 9 SES-03 Scioto West 30

16 Background Information Planning Units School Info Current Enrollment Key ES MS PK Total SES-00 Scioto West SES-01 Scioto West SES-02 Scioto West SES-03 Scioto West SES-04 Scioto West SES-05 Scioto West SES-06 Scioto West SES-07 Scioto West SES-08 Scioto West SES-09 Scioto West SES-10 Scioto West SES-11 Scioto West SES-12 Scioto West SES-13 Scioto West SES-14 Scioto West WES-00 Walnut East WES-01 Walnut East WES-02 Walnut East WES-03 Walnut East WES-04 Walnut East WES-05 Walnut East WES-06 Walnut East WES-07 Walnut East WES-08 Walnut East WES-09 Walnut East WES-10 Walnut East WES-11 Walnut East WES-12 Walnut East School Info Current Enrollment Key ES MS PK Total AES-00 Ashville East AES-01 Ashville East AES-02 Ashville East AES-03 Ashville East SBES-00 S. Bloomfield East SBES-01 S. Bloomfield East SBES-02 S. Bloomfield East SBES-03 S. Bloomfield East SBES-04 S. Bloomfield East SBES-05 S. Bloomfield West SBES-06 S. Bloomfield West SBES-07 S. Bloomfield East SBES-08 S. Bloomfield East SBES-09 S. Bloomfield West SBES-10 S. Bloomfield West SBES-11 S. Bloomfield East SBES-12 S. Bloomfield East SBES-13 S. Bloomfield West SBES-14 S. Bloomfield West Planning Units The purpose of these planning units are to assist in the boundary planning process. These, along with the other data in this packet, can be used to create preliminary ideas for the steering committee to consider. 16

Units With Current Elementary School Boundaries

17 Background Information Current Boundaries Elementary School Boundaries Middle School Boundaries Planning Units With Current Elementary School Boundaries Planning Units with Current Middle School Boundaries

18 Background Information Student Density Map Student Density: PK-8 The map above represents students per square mile. 7 18

boundaries. The corresponding table illustrates the enrollment at each school with utilization if this were the case.

19 Background Information Closest School Analysis 8 Closest School Analysis The map above shows how the boundaries would look if all elementary students attended the school that was geographically closest to them, as compared to the current boundaries. The corresponding table illustrates the enrollment at each school with utilization if this were the case. School Enrollment Capacity Utilization Ashville ES % Scioto ES % South Bloomfield ES % Walnut ES % 19

20 Background Information Development Development Within the District Map Number Subdivision Elementary Boundary Additional # of Units Planning Unit Notes 1 Chestnut Commons Scioto 147 SES-03 Westport Homes, found in previous study, confirmed by Westport Homes 2 Walker Pointe Scioto 42 SES-01 Maronda Homes, found in previous study 3 Ashton Crossing Ashville 250 AES acres, development has already begun- won't be ready for 1-2 years 4 Cromley Road/ Lockbourne-Eastern Rd Area Walnut - WES-06 Grant funding was received to expand sanitary sewer service to this area, suspected subdivision in near future once this is completed, some of the area is owned by Sturdy Builders 5 Bloomfield Hills S. Bloomfield - SBES-00 Pulte Homes, no plans to expand 6 Scioto Landing/River Bend S. Bloomfield - SBES-00 Owned by Moronda Homes, no plans to expand 7 Southern Point- area south of subdivision Scioto - SES-07 Pulte Homes 9 20

21 Background Information Student Yield by Subdivision Subdivision Units PK-8 Students Yield ASHBROOK ESTATES ASHTON CROSSING ASHTON VILLAGE ASHTON WOODS BISHOP BLOOMFIELD HILLS BOOR ADDITION CANAL VIEW ESTATES CHESTNUT ESTATES CRITES-COOK CROMLEY ADDITION DOLBY ADDITION EAST LAWN FOXFIRE ESTATES GENOA CROSSING POWELL RIVER BEND SCIOTO LANDING SOUTHERN POINT (SINGLE FAMILY HOMES) SUNNYSIDE ACRES THE ESTATE LOTS AT SOUTHERN POINT THE VILLAGE AT SOUTHERN POINT (CONDOMINIUMS) WALKER POINTE WALNUT HEIGHTS WEST SCIOTO GREEN WILLOW BROOK TOTAL

22 Develop Preliminary Options Steering committee members utilized GIS and other background information to develop preliminary options. The committee developed strengths and challenges for each option as they compared to the guidelines. The committee created14 preliminary options. 22

23 Preliminary Options 23

24 Develop Options Steering committee members vetted through all preliminary options and decided upon the options to present to the community for feedback. 24

25 Community Meeting Options were presented to the community at large for feedback (not a vote). Process and options were presented. Community members completed an individual questionnaire to share initial reactions to the options. Community members then discussed options with other community members in a consensus building exercise. All feedback was collected and compiled into a results report. 25

26 Community Meeting Turnout Monday 11/ signed the registration form. 92 individual surveys, 18 group surveys Tuesday 11/ signed the registration forms 96 individual surveys, 15 group surveys Online responses collected from 11/14 11/ responses 26

27 Analyze Results The steering committee reviewed feedback from the community and considered it along with the guidelines as they developed a recommendation. Results included: Level of support for each option Written comments related to each option Aggregated background information of respondents (school, neighborhood, etc.) An excel workbook containing raw results which was filterable was also provided. 27

Analyze Results Option 1 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Individual 25 19 13 8 26 Group

28 Analyze Results Option 1 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Individual Group Individual Group $ Miles Online

Analyze Results Option 2 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Individual 11 17 14 15 33 Group

29 Analyze Results Option 2 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Individual Group Individual Group $ Miles Online

Analyze Results Option 3 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Individual 3 12 13 27 35 Group

30 Analyze Results Option 3 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Individual Group Individual Group $ Miles Online

Group Individual Group 4 2 3 9 1 22 7 6 31 2 5 4

31 Analyze Results Option 4a 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% F rom SBES To WES Individual Group Individual Group $ Miles Online

32 Analyze Results Option 4b 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Individual Group Individual Group $ Miles Online

Analyze Results PK-2 Option 5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 3-5 3-5 PK-2 Individual 14 8 10 12 45

33 Analyze Results PK-2 Option 5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% PK-2 Individual Group Individual Group Miles $ Online

Analyze Results Option 6 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Individual 30 14 15 7 26 Group

34 Analyze Results Option 6 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Individual Group Individual Group $ Miles Online

Analyze Results Preferred Option 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4a Option 4b Option 5

35 Analyze Results Preferred Option Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4a Option 4b Option 5 Option 6 Other or Combination No Consensus Monday Individual Monday Group Tuesday Individual Tuesday Group Online 35

36 Analyze Results Options Comparison: Individual Paper & Online Questionnaires 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Option Option Option Option 4a Option 4b Option Option Very Supportive Supportive Neutral Unsupportive Very Unsupportive 36

37 Develop Recommendation After reviewing the feedback from the community meetings, the steering committee developed a recommendation for the Superintendent. The committee voted on their preferred option based on the community feedback. 22 committee members voted for Option 1 5 committee members voted for Option 5 2 committee members voted for Option 6 37

38 Recommendation: Option 1 38

39 Recommendation Most supported and least unsupported by community Moves 562 students Creates 100% feeders into middle school No subdivision splits Balances middle school utilization Allows for growth at Scioto 39

40 Project Website All content related to the process was posted on this page. There was an FAQ page for community members to ask questions about the process. There was a link on the district website. 40

Transportation Equity Analysis

2015-16 Transportation Equity Analysis Each year the Seattle Public Schools updates the Transportation Service Standards and bus walk zone boundaries for use in the upcoming school year. For the 2014-15