Student Achievement WTPS Mrs. Cheryl Dyer, Superintendent Dr. Lisa Gleason, Director of Curriculum and Instruction 1

Transcription

1 Student Achievement WTPS Mrs. Cheryl Dyer, Superintendent Dr. Lisa Gleason, Director of Curriculum and Instruction 1

2 Topics Covered Proposed Changes for Statewide Assessments PARCC Results SAT and ACT Results Advanced Placement (AP) Results No reportable Science data due to NJSLA - Science Field Test 2

3 Proposed Changes to Statewide Assessments and High School Graduation Requirements (N.J.A.C. 6A:8) Current Regulations Proposed Amendments Take all associated PARCC assessments for: ELA 9, 10, 11 Alg. I, Geometry, Algebra II Take and pass: ELA 10 Algebra I Class of 2021 (current sophomores) Only alternative graduation option is Portfolio Appeals Process Class of 2020 (current juniors) Students must take all applicable assessments before availing themselves of the menu of alternate options Take associated PARCC assessments for: ELA 9 and 10 End of course math in 9th and 10th (Alg 1 and Geometry OR Geometry and Algebra II) Take and pass: ELA 10 Algebra I Maintain the menu of graduation assessment options afforded to the class of 2020, including: ACT, SAT, ASFAB, PSAT, and ACCUPLACER Portfolio Appeals Process 3

4 Immediate Changes for Spring 2019 Reduced Testing Times 4

5 5

6 PARCC Results English Language Arts Mathematics Grades

7 PARCC Performance Descriptors 1: Not yet meeting grade-level expectations for NJSLS 2: Partially meeting grade-level expectations for NJSLS 3: Approaching grade-level expectations for NJSLS 4: Meeting grade-level expectations for NJSLS 5: Exceeding grade-level expectations for NJSLS 7

8 English Language Arts 8

9 3rd Grade English Language Arts # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 98, % 14% 21% 44% 8% 52% District % 12% 15% 57% 11% 68% District % 10% 18% 57% 13% 70% AW % 13% 14% 48% 20% 68% CS % 5% 21% 60% 12% 72% OM % 17% 11% 59% 5% 64% WB % 17% 14% 55% 10% 65% 16% increase over state average. All schools exceeded state average more than 10%. 2% decrease in overall passing from 2017 to 2018 in this grade level. 9

10 3rd Grade English Language Arts - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 98, % 13.5% 21.4% 43.5% 4.8% 51.7% District % 12.1% 15.1% 56.5% 11.3% 67.8% Female % 10.6% 8.9% 61.0% 16.3% 77.2% Male % 13.8% 21.6% 51.7% 6.0% 57.8% Hispanic < 20 Asian < 10 Black < 10 White % 10.9% 14.7% 57.3% 12.8% 70.1% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes % 33.3% 26.7% 26.7% 3.3% 30.0% SE-Yes % 32.4% 17.6% 26.5% 0.0% 26.5% 504-Yes < 20 10

11 4th Grade English Language Arts # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 99, % 12% 22% 39% 19% 58% District 2018 District % 8% 23% 44% 22% 66% % 9% 20% 50% 19% 69% AW % 4% 19% 37% 37% 74% CS % 8% 34% 45% 9% 54% OM % 9% 15% 41% 31% 72% WB % 9% 19% 56% 13% 68% 8% increase over state average. Three schools exceeded state average more than 10%. 3% decrease in overall passing from 2017 to 2018 in this grade level. 11

12 4th Grade English Language Arts - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 99, % 12.3% 22.1% 39.1% 18.9% 58.0% District % 7.6% 23.3% 43.8% 21.7% 65.5% Female % 6.3% 23.4% 43.2% 26.1% 69.4% Male % 8.7% 23.2% 44.2% 18.1% 62.3% Hispanic < 20 Asian < 10 Black < 10 White % 6.5% 22.9% 43.9% 23.4% 67.3% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes % 22.2% 38.9% 27.8% 0.0% 27.8% SE-Yes % 26.1% 26.1% 21.7% 10.9% 32.6% 504-Yes <20 12

13 5th Grade English Language Arts # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 101, % 13% 22% 47% 11% 58% District 2018 District % 8% 22% 54% 13% 67% % 4% 18% 66% 12% 78% AW % 10% 26% 53% 8% 61% CS % 5% 27% 55% 11% 66% OM % 11% 14% 55% 17% 72% WB % 7% 18% 50% 18% 68% 9% increase over state average. Two schools exceeded state average more than 10%. 11% decrease in overall passing from 2017 to 2018 in this grade level. 13

14 5th Grade English Language Arts - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 101, % 12.6% 22.4% 47.2% 10.8% 58.0% District % 8.4% 22.0% 53.7% 12.8% 66.5% Female % 3.9% 15.5% 57.3% 20.4% 77.7% Male % 12.1% 27.4% 50.8% 6.5% 57.3% Hispanic % 18.5% 7.4% 55.6% 11.1% 66.7% Asian < 10 Black < 10 White % 6.4% 25.1% 52.9% 12.8% 65.8% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes % 23.3% 10.0% 46.7% 6.7% 53.3% SE-Yes % 23.1% 30.8% 36.5% 3.8% 40.4% 504-Yes < 20 14

15 Targeted Interventions 3rd - 5th Grade English Language Arts 15

16 Incorporate new digital formative assessment, Measuring Up, in grades 2-5 for diagnostic assessment, and progress monitoring Workshop model - teacher conferring in small groups to customize instruction and target deficits. Increases student choice. 1:1 Chromebooks to increase students ability to improve keyboarding, writing, and research Increase informational text and work with Literary Analysis and Research Simulation Tasks 16

17 Teachers participating in PLCs and district-wide grade level articulation to analyze data and adjust instruction. New word study program in grades 3-5 Words Their Way, to improve written expression and written knowledge New RTI model provides teachers with more specific interventions for struggling learners, including new digital intervention resource Branching Minds Title I programs for extended day intervention programs. 17

18 6th-8th Grade English Language Arts # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. 6 th grade 22% increase over state average. 10% increase in overall passing from 2017 State 99, % 14% 24% 41% 15% 56% District % 5% 17% 57% 21% 78% District % 8% 22% 57% 11% 68% 7 th grade 12% increase over state average. 9% increase in overall passing from 2017 State 99, % 10% 19% 34% 29% 63% District % 6% 16% 38% 37% 75% District % 9% 21% 36% 30% 66% 8 th grade 5% increase over state average. 2% increase in overall passing from 2017 State 100, % 11% 20% 40% 20% 60% District % 12% 18% 42% 23% 65% District % 7% 22% 45% 18% 63% 18

19 6th Grade English Language Arts - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 99, % 13.6% 24.0% 41.3% 14.9% 56.2% District % 4.6% 16.5% 56.5% 21.1% 77.6% Female % 1.9% 17.0% 50.9% 29.2% 80.2% Male % 6.9% 16.0% 61.1% 14.5% 75.6% Hispanic > 20 Asian < 10 Black < 10 White % 4.4% 15.1% 57.1% 22.0% 79.0% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes % 7.1% 39.3% 46.4% 3.6% 50.0% SE-Yes % 21.6% 29.7% 32.4% 8.1% 40.5% 504-Yes < 20 19

20 7th Grade English Language Arts - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 98, % 10.2% 18.5% 34.1% 28.6% 62.7% District % 5.8% 16.3% 37.8% 37.4% 75.2% Female % 3.6% 10.9% 38.0% 46.0% 83.9% Male % 7.5% 21.8% 37.6% 28.6% 66.2% Hispanic % 6.7% 43.3% 33.3% 13.3% 46.7% Asian < 10 Black < 10 White % 4.5% 12.5% 38.4% 41.5% 79.9% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes % 18.8% 31.3% 37.5% 9.4% 46.9% SE-Yes % 6.5% 41.3% 34.8% 4.3% 39.1% 504-Yes < 20 20

21 8th Grade English Language Arts - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 100, % 11.1% 19.8% 39.9% 20.4% 60.4% District % 11.9% 18.4% 41.5% 22.7% 64.3% Female % 1.6% 13.0% 54.5% 27.6% 82.1% Male % 20.1% 22.7% 31.2% 18.8% 50.0% Hispanic < 20 Asian < 10 Black < 10 White % 11.5% 17.6% 41.8% 23.4% 65.2% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes % 16.7% 25.0% 37.5% 12.5% 50.0% SE-Yes % 25.5% 29.4% 11.8% 13.7% 25.5% 504-Yes % 33.3% 19.0% 28.6% 4.8% 33.3% 21

22 Targeted Interventions 6th-8th Grade English Language Arts 22

23 Digital formative assessments, Measuring Up, for diagnostic assessment and progress monitoring. Increase in informational text through Measuring Up and Newsela. New intervention course for ELA, small group instruction, data based instruction Additional teaching support in 7th grade ELA for identified at risk students to provide Tier II supports. Teachers using CD time to analyze PARCC Evidence Statements to identify grade level weaknesses and target areas for at risk students. Title I programs for extended day and summer programs. 23

24 Workshop model - teacher conferring in small groups to customize instruction and target deficits. Increases student choice. 1:1 Chromebooks to increase students ability to provide increased opportunities for keyboarding, writing, research Continue to identify ED students at risk for literacy and analyze interventions and Title I extended day and extended year opportunities. New RTI model provides teachers with more specific interventions for struggling learners, including new digital intervention resource Branching Minds 24

25 9th-11th Grade English Language Arts # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. 9 th grade 8% increase over state average. 2% increase in overall passing from State 99, % 13% 21% 38% 16% 54% District % 9% 24% 46% 16% 62% District % 17% 28% 47% 13% 60% 10 th grade 3% decrease compared to state average. 8% decrease in overall passing from State 95, % 13% 19% 32% 18% 50% District % 17% 23% 37% 10% 47% District % 13% 25% 43% 12% 55% 11 th grade 2% decrease compared to state average. 5% decrease in overall passing from State 69, % 17% 22% 29% 9% 38% District % 18% 31% 33% 3% 36% District % 18% 28% 38% 3% 41% 25

26 9th Grade English Language Arts - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 99, % 12.5% 21.1% 38.0% 16.1% 54.1% District % 8.6% 24.4% 46.0% 15.8% 61.9% Female % 2.7% 19.5% 56.4% 19.5% 75.8% Male % 14.8% 29.6% 35.2% 12.0% 47.2% Hispanic % 10.0% 40.0% 25.0% 5.0% 30.0% Asian < 10 Black < 10 White % 8.6% 23.0% 47.9% 16.3% 64.2% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes % 19.4% 32.3% 16.1% 9.7% 25.8% SE-Yes % 22.4% 41.4% 17.2% 0.0% 17.2% 504-Yes % 4.5% 9.1% 68.2% 9.1% 77.3% 26

27 10th Grade English Language Arts - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 95, % 12.8% 19.0% 31.8% 18.1% 49.9% District % 16.8% 22.8% 36.6% 10.3% 47.0% Female % 10.8% 14.7% 46.1% 18.6% 64.7% Male % 21.5% 29.2% 29.2% 3.8% 33.1% Hispanic % 23.8% 28.6% 19.0% 4.8% 23.8% Asian < 10 Black < 10 White % 15.9% 22.9% 37.8% 11.4% 49.3% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes % 20.7% 31.0% 20.7% 0.0% 20.7% SE-Yes % 37.5% 12.5% 10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 504-Yes < 20 27

28 11th Grade English Language Arts - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 69, % 16.6% 22.2% 29.1% 9.0% 38.1% District % 18.2% 30.8% 32.8% 2.8% 35.6% Female % 14.2% 27.5% 45.8% 5.8% 51.7% Male % 22.0% 33.9% 20.5% 0.0% 20.5% Hispanic < 20 Asian < 10 Black < 10 White % 18.4% 29.6% 34.1% 3.1% 37.2% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes % 17.4% 43.5% 21.7% 0.0% 21.7% SE-Yes % 24.3% 24.3% 24.3% 2.7% 27.0% 504-Yes < 20 28

29 Targeted Interventions 9th-11th Grade English Language Arts 29

30 Title I funding for extended day programs and shared school social worker Increase in informational text and progress monitoring through new digital resource, Newsela Supervisor working with teachers to analyze lesson plans for standards alignment Additional English push-in teaching support for Tier I interventions with struggling learners. Targeting English 10 classes due to HS graduation requirement. Unit Lunch English Support now available Teachers using CD time to analyze PARCC Evidence Statements to identify grade level weaknesses and target areas for at risk students 30

31 Workshop pilot - teacher conferring in small groups to customize instruction and target deficits. Increases student choice. 1:1 Chromebooks to increase students ability to provide increased opportunities for keyboarding, writing, research Continue to identify ED students at risk for literacy and analyze interventions and Title I extended day and extended year opportunities. New RTI model provides teachers with more specific interventions for struggling learners, including new digital intervention resource Branching Minds Analyze curriculum modifications for students with IEPS to ensure appropriate exposure to grade level standards. 31

32 Mathematics 32

33 3rd Grade Mathematics # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 99, % 15% 24% 38% 15% 53% District 2018 District % 5% 20% 45% 27% 72% % 7% 18% 49% 24% 73% Allenwood % 4% 11% 48% 36% 84% Central % 3% 24% 49% 23% 72% Old Mill % 9% 22% 40% 23% 73% West Belmar % 3% 21% 41% 28% 69% 19% increase over state average. All schools exceeded state average more than 10%. 1% decrease in overall passing from 2017 to 2018 in this grade level. 33

34 3rd Grade Mathematics - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 99, % 15.3% 23.7% 37.8% 15.2% 53.0% District % 5.0% 20.0% 45.0% 26.7% 71.7% Female % 6.5% 22.6% 39.5% 27.4% 66.9% Male % 3.4% 17.2% % 76.7% Hispanic < 20 Asian < 10 Black < 10 White % 5.2% 18.9% 44.3% 29.7% 74.1% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes % 12.9% 29.0.% 41.9% 3.2% 45.2% SE-Yes % 17.1% 40.0% 17.1% 11.4% 28.6% 504-Yes < 20 34

35 4th Grade Mathematics # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 100, % 17% 26% 42% 8% 50% District 2018 District % 14% 27% 46% 11% 57% % 14% 26% 52% 5% 57% Allenwood % 6% 19% 48% 24% 72% Central % 24% 26% 42% 5% 47% Old Mill % 9% 31% 49% 10% 59% West Belmar % 6% 34% 50% 9% 59% 7% increase over state average. Three schools exceeded state average, AW by 22% Consistent performance in overall passing from 2017 to 2018 in this grade level. 35

36 4th Grade Mathematics - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 100, % 16.8% 26.3% 41.8% 7.6% 49.4% District % 13.7% 26.9% 46.2% 11.2% 57.4% Female % 7.2% 30.6% 48.6% 11.7% 60.4% Male % 18.8% 23.9% 44.2% 10.9% 55.1% Hispanic < 20 Asian < 10 Black < 10 White % 12.1% 27.6% 46.7% 11.7% 58.4% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes % 30.6% 36.1% 27.8% 0,0% 27.8% SE-Yes % 26.1% 34.8% 30.4% 0.0% 30.4% 504-Yes < 20 36

37 5th Grade Mathematics # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 101, % 17% 27% 38% 10% 48% District 2018 District % 12% 29% 47% 10% 57% % 10% 30% 49% 10% 59% Allenwood % 11% 28% 51% 8% 59% Central % 14% 30% 49% 7% 56% Old Mill % 9% 28% 45% 14% 59% West Belmar % 11% 29% 39% 14% 53% 9% increase over state average. Two schools exceeded state average. 2% decrease in overall passing from 2017 to 2018 in this grade level. 37

38 5th Grade Mathematics - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 1001, % 17.0% 26.7% 38.5% 10.4% 48.8% District % 11.5% 28.8% 47.3% 10.2% 57.5% Female % 8.7% 30.1% 44.7% 14.6% 59.2% Male % 13.8% 27.6% 49.6% 6.5% 56.1% Hispanic % 18.5% 25.9% 44.4% 3.7% 48.1% Asian < 10 Black < 10 White % 10.8% 28.5% 48.9% 10.2% 59.1% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes % 23.3% 33.3% 26.7% 6.7% 33.3% SE-Yes % 26.9% 36.5% 26.9% 3.8% 30.8% 504-Yes < 20 38

39 Targeted Interventions 3rd - 5th Grade Mathematics 39

40 Incorporate new digital formative assessment, Measuring Up, in grades 2-5 for diagnostic assessment, and progress monitoring Teachers participating in PLCs and district-wide grade level articulation to analyze data and adjust instruction Targeted centers specific to student s areas for growth New RTI model provides teachers with more specific interventions for struggling learners, including new digital intervention resource Branching Minds 40

41 New district RTI Math team leading professional development Math interventionists Title I extended day programs for Tier II interventions 41

42 6th-8th Grade Mathematics # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. 6 th grade 16% increase over state average. 5% increase in overall passing from 2017 State 100, % 20% 28% 36% 8% 44% District % 10% 28% 51% 9% 60% District % 9% 31% 49% 6% 55% 7 th grade 6% increase over state average. 12% increase in overall passing from 2017 State 94, % 20% 29% 36% 7% 44% District % 14% 34% 50% 0% 50% District % 14% 47% 37% 1% 38% 8 th grade 11% increase over state average. 20% increase in overall passing from 2017 State 64, % 23% 27% 27% 1% 29% District % 18% 33% 41% 0% 41% District % 20% 35% 20% 1% 21% 42

43 6th Grade Mathematics - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 100, % 20.1% 27.9% 35.6% 8.0% 43.5% District % 10.2% 27.7% 51.1% 9.4% 60.4% Female % 10.4% 27.4% 47.2% 13.2% 60.4% Male % 10.1% 27.9% 54.3% 6.2% 60.5% Hispanic <20 Asian < 10 Black < 10 White % 9.4% 26.6% 53.2% 9.4% 62.6% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes % 28.6% 35.7% 28.6% 3.6% 32.1% SE-Yes % 35.1% 29.7% 21.6% 5.4% 27.0% 504-Yes < 20 43

44 7th Grade Mathematics - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 94, % 20.3% 28.6% 36.0% 7.4% 43.4% District % 13.5% 33.8% 49.8% 0.5% 50.2% Female % 12.7% 30.0% 55.5% 0.9% 56.4% Male % 14.4% 38.1% 43.3% 0.0% 43.3% Hispanic % 31.0% 44.8% 24.1% 0.0% 24.1% Asian < 10 Black < 10 White % 9.1% 32.3% 54.9% 0.6% 55.5% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes % 40.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% 20.0% SE-Yes % 26.1% 37.7% 26.1% 0.0% 26.1% 504-Yes < 20 44

45 8th Grade Mathematics - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 64, % 22.7% 27.1% 27.2% 1.0% 28.2% District % 17.9% 32.5% 41.5% 0.0% 41.5% Female % 14.6% 22.0% 56.1% 0.0% 56.1% Male % 19.5% 37.8% 34.1% 0.0% 34.1% Hispanic < 20 Asian < 10 Black < 10 White % 16.2% 33.3% 41.9% 0.0% 41.9% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes < 20 SE-Yes % 23.8% 31.0% 26.2% 0.0% 26.2% 504-Yes < 20 45

46 Targeted Interventions 6th-8th Grade Mathematics 46

47 New envision Math resource grades 7 & 8 Incorporate new digital formative assessment, Measuring Up, in grades 6-8 for diagnostic assessment, and progress monitoring Teachers participating in PLCs and district-wide grade level articulation to analyze data and adjust instruction New RTI model provides teachers with more specific interventions for struggling learners, including new digital intervention resource Branching Minds 47

48 New district RTI Math team leading professional development Additional math teacher available during Math 7 to provide Tier II interventions. Currently undergoing Math program evaluation 48

49 Algebra I # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 110, % 19% 24% 39% 6% 45% District % 7% 17% 67% 5% 72% District % 10% 29% 58% 1% 59% WIS % 1% 3% 87% 9% 96% WHS % 14% 35% 43% 0% 43% 27% increase over state average. 13% increase in overall passing from WIS - 22% increase in overall passing from

50 Algebra I - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 110, % 18.6% 24.3% 39.3% 6.5% 45.8% District % 6.8% 17.4% 67.2% 5.1% 72.4% Female % 4.1% 18.5% 71.2% 4.8% 76.0% Male % 9.5% 16.3% 63.3% 5.4% 68.7% Hispanic % 12.5% 25.0% 50.0% 4.2% 54.2% Asian < 10 Black < 10 White % 6.7% 16.7% 68.7% 5.2% 73.8% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes % 14.7% 32.4% 38.2% 2.9% 41.2% SE-Yes % 25.4% 28.8% % 33.9% 504-Yes % 10.0% 25.0% 60.0% 5.0% 65.0% 50

51 Geometry # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 90, % 31% 30% 25% 5% 30% District 2018 District % 18% 37% 41% 3% 44% % 18% 37% 36% 5% 41% WIS % 0% 17% 67% 16% 83% WHS % 22% 42% 34% 0% 34% 14% increase over state average. 3% increase in overall passing from

52 Geometry- Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 90, % 31.5% 29.6% 24.6% 4.9% 29.5% District % 17.7% 37.0% 40.8% 3.2% 44.1% Female % 12.4% 39.9% 43.8% 3.3% 47.1% Male % 22.8% 34.2% 38.0% 3.2% 41.1% Hispanic % 17.4% 56.5% 17.4% 0.0% 17.4% Asian < 10 Black < 10 White % 17.5% 35.6% 42.5% 3.6% 46.2% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes % 26.7% 43.3% 23.3% 0.0% 23.3% SE-Yes % 65.9% 22.0% 9.8% 0.0% 9.8% 504-Yes <20 52

53 Algebra II # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 78, % 22% 18% 25% 4% 29% District 2018 District % 25% 26% 34% 1% 36% % 17% 30% 34% 0% 34% 7% increase over state average. 2% increase in overall passing from

54 Algebra II - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 78, % 22.4% 18.0% 24.6% 4.0% 28.6% District % 25.0% 25.5% 34.0% 1.0% 35.0% Female % 16.7% 34.4% 33.3% 0.0% 33.3% Male % 32.7% 17.3% 34.6% 1.9% 36.5% Hispanic <20 Asian < 10 Black < 10 White % 23.0% 27.0% 36.0% 1.1% 37.1% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes <20 SE-Yes % 47.8% 17.4% 4.3% 0.0% 4.3% 504-Yes <20 54

55 Targeted Interventions Algebra I Geometry Algebra II 55

56 Algebra and Geometry teachers at WIS and WHS will pilot new digital resource, Math IXL, a standards-based progress monitoring tool Algebra I 7.5 course meets A/B for full year Algebra II 7.5 course meets A/B for full year Math Unit Lunch support teacher available daily Supervisors working with teachers to analyze PARCC Evidence Statements to identify areas for growth and adjust planning and instruction 56

57 New RTI model provides teachers with more specific interventions for struggling learners, including new digital intervention resource Branching Minds New district RTI Math team leading professional development Currently undergoing Math program evaluation 57

58 SAT/ACT Results Wall High School 58

59 SAT Results: 5 Year Data Critical Reading Year Change Wall HS New Jersey N/A N/A Total Group N/A N/A N/A Mathematics Year Change Wall HS New Jersey N/A N/A Total Group N/A N/A N/A 59

60 ACT Results: 5 Year Data English Year Change Wall HS New Jersey Benchmark Score: Mathematics Year Change Wall HS New Jersey Benchmark Score: 60

61 ACT Results: 5 Year Data Reading Year Change Wall HS New Jersey Benchmark Score: Science Year Change Wall HS New Jersey Benchmark Score: 61

62 Advanced Placement (AP) Wall High School 62

63 Course/Test Art History 25% N/A N/A N/A 100% Biology 76% 96% 100% 97% 96% Calculus AB 100% 70% 91% 88% 50% Calculus BC 84% 79% 90% 89% 91% Chemistry 100% 100% 100% 86% 94% Computer Science N/A N/A 100% 100% N/A English Language and Composition 81% 92% 93% 100% 90% English Literature and Composition 84% 100% 91% 81% 75% Environmental Science 63% 56% 71% 69% 71% European History N/A N/A 16% 42% N/A Values in chart are % passing Passing scores are scores of 3, 4, or 5 63

64 Course/Test French Language and Culture N/A N/A 9% 40% 33% Human Geography N/A N/A 88% 100% 100% Latin 100% N/A 33% 10% 50% Macroeconomics 61% 46% 42% 87% 91% Microeconomics 65% 40% 44% 36% 43% Music Theory N/A 100% 75% 80% 100% Physics 1 N/A 82% 43% 56% 64% Psychology 74% 80% 76% 83% 69% Spanish Language and Culture 79% 92% 85% 89% 90% Statistics 60% 29% 58% 100% 77% 64

65 Course/Test Studio Art: 2-D Design Portfolio N/A 100% 100% 100% 100% Studio Art: Drawing Portfolio N/A 100% 100% 100% 100% US Government and Politics N/A 46% 41% 94% 100% United States History 70% 65% 73% 89% 100% Overall Passing 78% 78% 70% 87% 86% 65

66 Breakdown of 2018 Scores* Test Total Exams Total Passing Test Total Exams Total Passing Biology % Environmental Science Calculus AB % Human Geography % % Calculus BC % Macro % Chemistry % Physics % English Lang % Psychology % English Lit % Spanish % Statistics % *The breakdown is not reported for courses/tests where fewer than 10 students took the test. 66

67 Highlights of AP 2016 Total Passing Scores 304 Total scores of 3: 129 (42%) Total scores of 4: 119 (39%) Total scores of 5: 57 (19%) 2017 Total Passing Scores: 313 Total Scores of 3: 120 (38%) Total Scores of 4: 137 (44%) Total Scores of 5: 56 (18%) 2018 Total Passing Scores: 264 Total Scores of 3: 94 (29% Total Scores of 4: 105 (32%) Total Scores of 5: 65 (20%) 41 AP Scholars 17 AP Scholars with Honor 10 AP Scholars with Distinction 1 National Scholar 31 AP Scholars 15 AP Scholars with Honor 21 AP Scholars with Distinction 2 National Scholars 26 AP Scholars 11 AP Scholars with Honor 12 AP Scholars with Distinction 1 National Scholar 67

68 ACCESS for ELLs K-12 68

69 Purpose of ACCESS The content of the assessments aligns with the five WIDA ELD Standards: Social & Instructional Language Language of Language Arts Language of Mathematics Language of Science Language of Social Studies 69

70 ACCESS One: Entering Two: Emerging Three: Developing Four: Expanding Five: Bridging Six: Reaching Listening Speaking Reading Writing Oral Language Literacy Comprehension Overall Score

71 Exit from ESL Program Students exit the ESL program based on triangulation of the following criteria: ACCESS score at or above 4.5 PARCC scores Report card grades Classroom teacher recommendation ESL teacher recommendation Students exit the ESL program based on triangulation of the following criteria: 7 ESL program students 71

72 72