Boundary Review Committee Recommendation

Transcription

1 North Thurston Public Schools Boundary Revision Process Boundary Review Committee Recommendation Jim Dugan, Process Facilitator Troy Oliver, Assistant Superintendent November 3,

2 Boundary Revision Process School Board Presentations and Updates December 16, 2014 School Board Presentation April 28, 2015 School Board Update June 16, 2015 School Board Update September 15, 2015 School Board Update September 21, 22, 23, 2015 Community Forums November 3, 2015 School Board Presentation 5 Presentations/Updates in 11 Months 2

3 Boundary Review Committee Representative of the entire District Selected by each high school zone Comprised of Parent, Staff, Student and Community Joined by additional Community Leadership and District Leadership Not selected by the District Office 27 total Committee members Core team of 20 3

4 4

5 March 11, 2015 April 13, 2015 May 18, 2015 August 3, 2015 August 10, 2015 August 17, 2015 August 24, 2015 August 31, 2015 September 28, 2015 October 5, 2015 October 12, 2015 November 2, 2015 Boundary Review Process Boundary Review Committee Meetings 12 Total 5

6 Boundary Revision Process School Board Directed Purpose Populate Salish Middle School for the Fall of Populate a K-5 elementary school at the current Aspire Middle School campus for the Fall of 2017 Do so based on priorities set by the School Board 6

7 School Board Priorities #1-Balance School size by levels and socio-economic diversity #2-Continuity Keep students together throughout their K-12 experience #3-Efficiency Efficient and effective transportation practices 7

8 Committee Operating Principles Board Priorities: Achieve as many as possible Boundary Changes: Minimize as much as possible Community Voice: Include in decision making Student Voice: Include in decision making Communication: Committee to the board to the community Projected Growth: Build in capacity for future growth 8

9 What the Committee needed to accomplish Populate Salish Middle School and Elementary School #14 Balance of school populations at all levels Balance diversity with boundary changes Mitigate the Mountain View split Mitigate the Olympic View split Increase River Ridge and Meadows enrollments Reduce Olympic View, Komachin and Timberline enrollments Elementary to Middle to High School continuity Create room for growth at all schools 9

10 What the Committee struggled with How best to plan for growth: Based on what? Where? What to do with Lacey: Where should Lacey go to middle school? Decrease the load on Komachin: How? Continuity? Increase the load on Meadows: From where? Decrease the load on Olympic View: To where? Fill Salish: From where? Military family student impact: Impact? How many? Where? Walk zones: Keep as many as possible. What if not possible? Where? 10

11 - School Mileage Chart 11

12 The Committee s biggest challenge The thumb 200 plus students reside in the thumb Need to decrease the load on Komachin no room for added growth due to 6 th grade transition Unique location of Komachin relative to the students they serve top corner Step 1: Woodland sent to Nisqually not enough load reduction Transportation route (current) from Schilter Farm to Mountain View is 13 mins. To Chinook adds 5 to 7 minutes. Approx 20 minutes one way. Coupled with goal to end splits no partial moves. Board priority #2 Send Mountain View in total to Chinook Committee struggled with this solution to the very end 12

13 The Committee s biggest challenge Keeping the thumb in Komachin and Timberline caused the following: Projected Enrollment Timberline increase in enrollment - to approx North Thurston decrease in enrollment - to approx Komachin increase in enrollment to approx Chinook decrease in enrollment to approx This is in direct conflict with the School Board #1 priority balance school size by levels. 13

14 Committee Final Recommendation Two step recommended solution for School Board consideration: (1) School Boundary Changes (2) Boundary Change Phasing Plan 14

15 Elementary School Boundary Changes 15

16 Elementary School Boundary Changes The primary elementary school changes are: Woodland to Nisqually then back to Timberline Lacey to Salish then back to North Thurston Lydia Hawk Boundary Change from Meadows and Seven Oaks Olympic View Boundary Change to Meadows Seven Oaks Boundary Change to Lydia Hawk and Olympic View Pleasant Glade Boundary Change to South Bay Populate ES #14 From Lakes Olympic View and Mountain View Mitigated the splits 16

17 Elementary School Boundary Changes Current vs. Projected Enrollment Numbers: Current Enrollment Range 361 to 757: Diff of 396 Projected Enrollment Range 329 to 573: Diff of 244 Improvement in enrollment balancing by 38% School Board #1 priority enrollment balancing 17

18 Middle School Boundary Changes 18

19 Middle School Boundary Changes Decrease the load on Chinook and Komachin Populate entirely Salish Chinook: Pleasant Glade, South Bay and Mountain View: From 996 to 709 Komachin: Lakes, Chambers Prairie, Horizons and ES#14: From 740 to 626 (to include 6 th grade for the very first time) Nisqually: Lydia Hawk, Seven Oaks, Evergreen Forest and Woodland: From 807 to 762 Salish: Lacey, Olympic View and Meadows: From 0 to

20 Middle School Boundary Changes Current vs. Projected Enrollment Numbers: Current Enrollment Range 740 to 996; Diff of 256 Projected Enrollment Range 578 to 762: Diff of 184 Improvement in enrollment balancing by 29% School Board #1 priority enrollment balancing 20

21 High School Boundary Changes 21

22 High School Boundary Changes Decrease the load on Timberline Increase the load on River Ridge Hold steady on the load at North Thurston North Thurston: Fed by Chinook and Salish Pleasant Glade, South Bay, Mountain View and Lacey Timberline: Fed by Komachin and Nisqually Lakes, Chambers Prairie, Horizons, Woodland and ES#14 River Ridge: Fed by Nisqually and Salish Evergreen Forest, Olympic View, Meadows, Seven Oaks and Lydia Hawk 22

23 High School Boundary Changes Current vs. Projected Enrollment Numbers: Current Enrollment Range 1059 to 1742; Diff of 683 Projected Enrollment Range 1404 to 1522: Diff of 118 Improvement in enrollment balancing by 83% School Board #1 priority enrollment balancing 23

24 School Capacity for Growth School Projected Enrollment Goal Capacity % of Goal Capacity North Thurston % Timberline % River Ridge % Chinook % Komachin % Nisqually % Salish % Aspire % 24

25 School Capacity for Growth School Projected Enrollment Goal Capacity % of Goal Capacity Chambers Prairie % Horizon % Lakes % Meadows % Mountain View % Pleasant Glade % South Bay % 25

26 School Capacity for Growth School Projected Enrollment Goal Capacity % of Goal Capacity Evergreen Forest % Lacey % Lydia Hawk % Olympic View % Seven Oaks % Woodland % ES# % 26

27 Socio-Economic Diversity We estimate the free and reduced lunch % at the middle school level to land in the range of: Salish: 49% (1) 59% (2) Olympic 29% (3) 62% Komachin: 42% Current: 43.5% (1) 31% (2) 41% (3) Chambers 57% (4) ES 41% 27

28 Socio-Economic Diversity We estimate the free and reduced lunch % at the middle school level to land in the range of: Nisqually: 47% Current: 48% (1) Lydia 70% (2) Seven 44% (3) Evergreen 36% (4) 39% Chinook: 49% Current: 47% (1) South 32% (2) Pleasant 68% (3) Mountain 56% 28

29 Accomplishments Populated Salish and Elementary School #14 Balanced school populations Balanced diversity Mitigated the elementary school splits Increased River Ridge and Meadows enrollments Reduced Olympic View, Komachin and Timberline enrollments Elementary to Middle to High School continuity Created room for growth at all schools 29

30 High School Phasing Plan Fall 2016 High Schools North Thurston, Timberline and River Ridge: Freshmen to Juniors: Guaranteed Waiver Status No transportation will be provided for waiver students Current 8 th graders will go to the new boundary high schools Siblings of HS students will receive priority status as indicated in the current transfer policy although not guaranteed 30

31 Middle School Phasing Plan Fall 2016 Middle Schools Chinook, Nisqually, Komachin and Salish: Guaranteed waivers not available to any MS student Students go to the home attendance area middle school per the new revised boundary changes Current waiver process would still be followed and available to all students No transportation will be provided for waiver students 31

32 Elementary School Phasing Plan Fall 2016 Elementary Schools Lydia Hawk, Meadows, Olympic View, Evergreen Forest, Seven Oaks, Pleasant Glade, South Bay, Lacey, Woodland and Horizons: Current 5 th graders would move on to the new middle school Current 4 th graders: Guaranteed Waiver Status No transportation will be provided for waiver students Current K-3 would move to the new elementary school The standard waiver process applies to all K-3 families 32

33 Elementary School Phasing Plan Fall 2017 Elementary Schools Chambers Prairie, ES#14, Lakes and Mountain View Current 5 th graders move to new schools the Fall of 2016 All other grades move the Fall of 2017 No guaranteed waivers Standard waiver process is always available to all students No transportation will be provided for waiver students 33

34 What is next. Boundary Review Committee recommendation at the Nov. 3 School Board Meeting inclusive of a phasing proposal for Board consideration Incorporate School Board feedback to the Committee between Nov. 3 and Nov. 17 Final Boundary Review Committee recommendation to the School Board on Nov 17 for School Board action 34

35 Special Thanks Boundary Review Committee Community Participation and Feedback 35